Priscila Chaverri

The EOL Profile Newsfeed contains comments left for its owner by other members, EOL Community invitations, and gathers updates associated with the items in the owner's EOL watch list.

Add a new comment

  • Profile picture of Cyndy Parr who took this action.
    Cyndy Parr added an unknown item to the collection "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List".

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Cyndy Parr who took this action.
    Cyndy Parr added "Eupelmidae" to the collection "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List".

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Cyndy Parr who took this action.
    Cyndy Parr added "Pteroclididae" to the collection "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List".

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Dana Campbell who took this action.
  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List":

    @петя спасова: The forums are for programmers to discuss technical issues. If you have general questions, you can ask them in the EOL Discussion Group. You can upload video to EOL through YouTube, Flickr, or Vimeo. For more information, see our HELP pages: http://eol.org/info/contribute#Third

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of петя спасова who took this action.

    петя спасова commented on "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List":

    @Katja Schulz: wow there are forums.thanks for your help. i have posted a thread in which i ask how can i upload videos to eol.

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Mareike Keuters who took this action.
    Mareike Keuters joined the community "EOL Curators".

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.
    Yan Wong added an unknown item to the collection "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List".

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List":

    @Katja Schulz: Thanks. Just posted a reply about oddities bird with mammals, I've also remember seeing guitar fish on the media tab for a higher level group like beetles.

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List":

    @Yan Wong: Alouatta nigerrima and Alouatta belzebul are now separated. Naemorhedus griseus is apparently regarded as a subspecies of Naemorhedus caudatus by some, so that's why you see griseus images in the caudatus collection. There's no easy fix for this. Similarly, Hapalemur alaotrensis is regarded as a subspecies of Hapalemur griseus by some, so that's why they are getting mixed up.

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List":

    @Yan Wong: I just responded to this in the forum: http://eol.org/forums/12/topics/78/posts/259 Not an easy fix.

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of петя спасова who took this action.

    петя спасова commented on "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List":

    @Cyndy Parr: i am going to add things to in the taxon clean up list.

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Cyndy Parr who took this action.
    Cyndy Parr added an unknown item to the collection "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List".

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Michаel Frаnkis: How are these distinguished in wikimedia Taxonavigation boxes? Do people put Subspecies | salzmannii, Variatas | mongolica, etc. or do they list the whole thing out, as
    Subspecies | Pinus nigra salzmannii
    Variatas | Pinus sylvestris mongolica
    I'm assuming that they don't physically insert the "subs." text themselves, but the template does it for them? Also, can you have both a subspecies and a variety? If so, in the Taxonav box do you put Subspecies | Pinus nigra salzmannii, Variatas | Pinus nigra salzmannii albus? And then how do we cope if we get something like this within a single Taxonav box?
    Subspecies | salzmannii
    Variatas | Pinus nigra albus
    I.e. do we have to insert the salzmannii between the nigra and the albus in this case?

    2 months ago • edited: 2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Michаel Frаnkis who took this action.

    Michаel Frаnkis commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Yan Wong: Thanks! Unfortunately I don't understand all the computer coding (not my thing, I fear), but if it works, good. The difference between zoology and botany is that zoology only has one infraspecific rank (subspecies), so a subspecific name doesn't need any clarification other than having three names; thus e.g. Dendrocopos major pinetorum. Conversely, in botany, there are three infraspecific ranks, in order of decreasing distinction: subspecies (subsp.; for major differences in a species), varietas (var.; for medium differences), forma (f.; very small differences); of these the first two are widely used, forma rather less so. Because of the different ranks, it is essential to state which rank is being used, thus e.g. Pinus nigra subsp. salzmannii; Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica; Abies veitchii f. chlorocarpa. For definitions of the ranks, see e.g. definitions in Table 12.1 in Stuessy (2009), Principles of Plant Taxonomy (p. 158, available on google books).

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List":

    @Katja Schulz: Oh, and if you *really* have some free time (!), I seem to be getting identical images for Alouatta nigerrima / Alouatta belzebul, Naemorhedus caudatus / Naemorhedus griseus, and Hapalemur alaotrensis / Hapalemur griseus. I think these are all cases where the taxonomy is in a bit of flux though, so perhaps my database of separate species is wrong. Either way, they are of lower priority, I reckon.

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Michаel Frаnkis: I had a bit of time before bed last night, and think I've managed to sort out some code for subspecies (not done anything for varieties).

    Let me ask you if I've taken a sensible approach. I take the wiki groups and map them to EoL groups, down to genus level, trimming the word "fossil" from start of the name if necessary. For genus names, I trim the name to the first word (to catch e.g. "Genus = Rosa spp"). For higher levels, I ignore anything with spaces in the name (I can't think of any cases where names above the species level consist of multiple words, apart from class="xxx Proteobacteria", for which there's a specific exception coded. I might be missing some viral stuff by doing this, I guess).
    For species and (now) subspecies, I check if the name consists of multiple words the first of which starts with a capital letter. If so, I take the first word as a genus name, if no genus has already been set. Otherwise, if the name is a single word, I take this as an epithet, and prepend the genus name (for a species) or the species name (for a subspecies).
    Finally, the EoL "scientificName" is chosen as the lowest level for which we have a name (i.e. choose subsp if it exists, otherwise sp, otherwise genus, etc), with the authority (if it exists) appended at the end of the entire name.

    Will this procedure cope with formatting differences between botany and zoology? I'm unclear how to deal with varieties in this scheme: any ideas?

    2 months ago

  • Profile picture of Michаel Frаnkis who took this action.

    Michаel Frаnkis commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Yan Wong: Thanks! I fear the github code means nothing to me :-( but if it can be adapted to add subspecies (used in both botany and zoology, but formatted differently in the two groups) and varietas (used in botany only), that would be a great help. Hybrids are less important, and I'd not bother to add cultivars (very few have commons pages with taxonav., and they are also of very minor significance for EoL).

    3 months ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "Taxon Clean-Up To Do List":

    @Katja Schulz: Ah, I just remembered that I spotted another primate problem, but I asked about it on the forums rather than (where I should have done) here. It's to do with Ateles spider monkeys. I'm no expert on this, so it might take some unraveling. The details are at http://eol.org/forums/12/topics/78/posts/256 if you want to check out what is going on.

    3 months ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Michаel Frаnkis: Oh, and I see from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Taxonavigation that there are a number of other subspecific terms that might be used (Hybrid, Cultivar, Varietas, etc), so I think it might turn out to be a bit complicated. Nowhere does it explicitly mention Subspecies as a potential parameter, although it does implicitly when talking about "intermediate ranks". I suspect that the previous version of the harvester may have missed out subspecies too.

    3 months ago