Add a new comment
-
Jennifer Groody joined the community "EOL Curators".
-
Abhay Hule commented on "EOL Curators":
@Cyndy Parr: Hi, Cyndy Parr: I will try to Identify as far as possible!!
-
Cyndy Parr commented on "EOL Curators":
I would appreciate if we have any crab experts that they take a look at this media gallery -- the best photos are all unreviewed and I'm not able to tell if they are all correctly identified: http://eol.org/pages/343925/media
-
Jennifer Hammock commented on "EOL Curators":
@Michael Wunderli: Michael, are the collections you're trying to eject contained within another community managed collection?
-
Michael Wunderli commented on "EOL Curators":
@Jason Sharp: thanks, it worked, but they still show up as featured collections.
-
Jason Sharp commented on "EOL Curators":
@Michael Wunderli: On the Managers tab for the collection, under 'Communities that can manage this collection' you should see the community that you are seeking. Select 'Remove'.
-
trobertson commented on "EOL Curators":
Hi all, @Constantine Wing Heng Lau @Cyndy Parr I will contact Discover Life but please see the DL page for that record [1] which states "decimal latitude_longitude from gazetteer ••• 41.1_-85.1". DL are automatically (and too optimistically) using a reverse geocoding to provide coordinates based on textual information on the record. The record published through GBIF [2] does not contain coordinates and the GBIF network content does not appear at first glance to be particularly problematic for that species [3]. I hope this helps explain the content you are seeing. Best wishes, Tim - Systems architect, GBIF [1] http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20l?id=GBIF50315052&btxt=Encyclopedia+of+Life&burl=www.eol.org/pages/311781 [2] http://data.gbif.org/occurrences/50312715 [3] http://data.gbif.org/species/2435451/
-
Cyndy Parr commented on "EOL Curators":
@Constantine Wing Heng Lau: Please click through to the map object page (http://eol.org/data_objects/21430628) and leave your comment so that the source and other visitors will know there is a problem. You can untrust and hide the map but again, give an explanation so that the source can fix the problem. This can also be a problem with our GBIF maps which currently are not curatable. We are aware and hope to improve this in the future.
-
Claudia Sotgia commented on "EOL Curators":
@Constantine Wing Heng Lau: After a quick look, if I understand correctly, you're right. The maps should represent the natural range of a species; the presence in a zoo cannot be considered as a population. I am a new curator and I still haven't seen as make changes, but I suggest leavingg only the distribution map. I hope I have been helpful. Also I would like to tell you that I'd like to contact you because my working group is writing a manual of good practices on bees. I am writing on pollination service and on the problems of habitat loss, fragmentation etc. Can you give me some advice? Ciao, Claudia
-
Constantine Wing Heng Lau commented on "EOL Curators":
I just took a random look on the page for Tasmanian Devil (Sarcophilus harrisii), and found an issue. As I understood this species should live on one or more islands next to Australia. However, the one of the 2 maps on its page showed that it appeared in the USA. Turns out, I checked the original source of the data point at USA, and found that it was a collection of the Ft. Wayne Children's Zoo in Indiana, US. (http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20m?act=make_map&kind=Sarcophilus+harrisii) In this case, the map seems misleading to the public because it was neither showing the natural occurance or all of the zoo records. Any suggestion?
-
John MacDougal marked "File:Passiflora-coccinea-Folio.JPG" as hidden on the "Passiflora coccinea Aubl. (1775)" page.
-
John MacDougal marked "File:Passiflora-coccinea-Folio.JPG" as untrusted on the "Passiflora coccinea Aubl. (1775)" page.
Reasons to untrust: misidentified -
John MacDougal marked "File:Passiflora coccinea.jpg" as hidden on the "Passiflora coccinea Aubl. (1775)" page.
-
John MacDougal marked "File:Passiflora coccinea.jpg" as untrusted on the "Passiflora coccinea Aubl. (1775)" page.
Reasons to untrust: misidentified -
John MacDougal commented on "File:Passiflora coccinea.jpg":
Passiflora fulgens Wallis is not a synonym of P. coccinea Aublet.
-
Maggie Whitson commented on "Physalis alkekengi_2":
These would be old fruits where the husk has deteriorated.
-
Maggie Whitson added an association between "File:Bereng-fruto-2.JPG" and "Solanum melongena".
-
Maggie Whitson marked "Physalis subglabrata TALL GROUND CHERRY" as hidden on the "Physalis subglabrata" page.
-
Maggie Whitson commented on "Physalis subglabrata TALL GROUND CHERRY":
This is Physalis heterophylla.