Kathy Hill

Cicada researcher

The EOL Profile Newsfeed contains comments left for its owner by other members, EOL Community invitations, and gathers updates associated with the items in the owner's EOL watch list.

Add a new comment

  • Profile picture of George Sims who took this action.
    George Sims joined the community "EOL Discussion Group".

    about 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Cyndy Parr who took this action.

    Cyndy Parr commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Abhay Hule: Many thanks!

    about 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Abhay Hule who took this action.

    Abhay Hule commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Cyndy Parr: Hi, Cyndy Parr: I will try to Identify as far as possible!!

    about 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Cyndy Parr who took this action.

    Cyndy Parr commented on "EOL Curators":

    I would appreciate if we have any crab experts that they take a look at this media gallery -- the best photos are all unreviewed and I'm not able to tell if they are all correctly identified: http://eol.org/pages/343925/media

    about 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Jennifer Hammock who took this action.

    Jennifer Hammock commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Michael Wunderli: Michael, are the collections you're trying to eject contained within another community managed collection?

    about 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Michael Wunderli who took this action.

    Michael Wunderli commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Jason Sharp: thanks, it worked, but they still show up as featured collections.

    about 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Jason Sharp who took this action.

    Jason Sharp commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Michael Wunderli: On the Managers tab for the collection, under 'Communities that can manage this collection' you should see the community that you are seeking. Select 'Remove'.

    about 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Michael Wunderli who took this action.

    Michael Wunderli commented on "EOL Curators":

    how do I remove collections form communities?

    about 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Sam Owens who took this action.
    Sam Owens joined the community "EOL Discussion Group".

    over 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Cyndy Parr who took this action.

    Cyndy Parr commented on "EOL Discussion Group":

    @Yan Wong: Okay, I'll contact you by email and we can pick this up there. Nice work!

    over 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Discussion Group":

    @Cyndy Parr:

    I've updated http://yanwong.me/MapImageTest.pdf with 225 new (green) data points pick haphazardly from monocots, composites, and pinophyta. The few green dots among the cloud of magentas are (I think) line drawings of plants. You can't see in this plot, but the png dimension completely separates out these plant line drawings from the maps, so yes - it seems to work almost better for plants. Dunno about microscopy images, though.

    Cyndy, I'll sort out a data file for you, so you can have a look in 3D yourself, if you like. Do you have an email address or whatever to which I can send the file? It won't be that big.

    over 3 years ago • edited: over 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Cyndy Parr who took this action.

    Cyndy Parr commented on "EOL Discussion Group":

    @Yan Wong: Very promising approach! If you did some plants would you get the same results? I'm almost convinced we could use this to do some batch type changes.

    over 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Discussion Group":

    Just looking for good images that are used in WikiSpecies, but not on EoL. Is there any reason why, for example, the nice image at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Condylura_cristata isn't being picked up. As far as I can see it meets the criteria at http://eol.org/info/curate_wiki#commons

    over 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Discussion Group":

    @Cyndy Parr:

    I've written a little blog post about my first look at the problem of identifying maps. The plot on that page shows that just using the compression metrics seems to work extraordinarily well, at least for my limited dataset. http://yanwong.me/?p=709

    p.s. not sure this "map" that I picked up should be in EoL anyway: http://eol.org/data_objects/5853197

    p.p.s. Cyndy: I've just done a plot with all the images in your "Retag as map type" collection added (in magenta) - with this larger dataset just using jpg vs gif compression seems to work best, although adding PNG compression data as well would probably help remove a few of the false positives. See the plot at http://yanwong.me/MapImageTest.pdf - the numbers on each point are dataobject IDs, so you can find the corresponding pictures on EoL

    over 3 years ago • edited: over 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Discussion Group":

    @Cyndy Parr: I've just had a quick play with classifying map images on EoL - since I've downloaded 738 pd/cc-by images to play with, of which 25 are maps (one for each placental mammal, as it happens). A first-pass is to see how well they compress using different methods. If you plot the compression ratios achieved using jpg and png compression, a good whack of the maps cluster in an obvious group. Have a look at http://www.yanwong.me/placentalmapclassification.pdf (images that are maps are marked in red). The EoL image name is written in tiny letters on each point, if you want to check up on them, but I don't know if these are unique names. It might take a few minutes longer for me to figure out how to put the EoL object id there instead. I've got a quick perl script that will calculate this in-memory, without saving jpg and png files to disk - you could try it on your maps collection. I've also got a few ideas for improving the clustering, but it seems a reasonable start.

    over 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Discussion Group":

    @Cyndy Parr: Ah - thanks.

    over 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Cyndy Parr who took this action.

    Cyndy Parr commented on "EOL Discussion Group":

    @Yan Wong: Nope, go to http://www.iucnredlist.org/search and search for Apis mellifera. It hasn't been assessed yet. Assessment is an arduous process and looks like only about 4000 insects have been looked at. I looked at a few and they were lepidoptera and odonates. Only 165 hymenoptera are on the list.

    over 3 years ago • edited: over 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Discussion Group":

    @Roderic Page: Thanks Rod (by the way, I'm an ex-student of yours). Still puzzled that there isn't IUCN data for the default page search on Apis mellifera - I assume IUCN knows about this one :)

    over 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Cyndy Parr who took this action.

    Cyndy Parr commented on "EOL Discussion Group":

    @Yan Wong: For historical reasons, we have two paths for info from IUCN...one for the status field at the top of the overview, and the other for the content on the details tab. I think the latter has the most up-to-date data even for the status field and we should look into getting rid of the former collection to avoid confusion.

    over 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Roderic Page who took this action.

    Roderic Page commented on "EOL Discussion Group":

    @Yan Wong: The vast majority of species on the planet are not covered by the IUCN (nor are they likely to be). The IUCN site suggests some 65,000 species have been assessed http://www.iucnredlist.org/about/summary-statistics (see Fig. 2). EOL has two IUCN lists (why?), the largest http://eol.org/collections/309 has 63097 taxa.

    over 3 years ago