Fernando Jerep

Characins enthusiast

The EOL Profile Newsfeed contains comments left for its owner by other members, EOL Community invitations, and gathers updates associated with the items in the owner's EOL watch list.

Add a new comment

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":

    @петя спасова: What animal genus and bacteria genus are you talking about?

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of петя спасова who took this action.

    петя спасова commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Katja Schulz: this is a big problem,katja,we need to separate the animal genus from the bacteria genus if is still on the site .

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of петя спасова who took this action.

    петя спасова commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Yan Wong: thats ok,yan,keep in touch.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Michаel Frаnkis: Oh, sorry. I don't know where I got that from then. I'm probably in the wrong here - I saw it as a plural somewhere vaguely official and must have assumed it was an Americanism rather than a misspelling.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Michаel Frаnkis: It's also the German name for Amoeba, so it's definitely good to have in the search index. I just had never seen it as an English word.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Michаel Frаnkis who took this action.

    Michаel Frаnkis commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Yan Wong: Re "Amoebe (US) or Amoebae (UK) is the plural" - I can't find any evidence Amoebe is an American plural for Amoeba, but it does appear to be a Dutch name for Ameoba.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Curators":

    @петя спасова: Good point, will do.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of петя спасова who took this action.

    петя спасова commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Mareike Keuters: dont know but hey they are also synonyms for the species to be in use.this would help to escape misunderstanding.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of петя спасова who took this action.

    петя спасова commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Yan Wong: this should go to the taxon-clean up list.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Yan Wong: I've just added those in as common names for Amoebozoa. I see that http://eol.org/pages/2915041/overview exists already, so should probably be merged.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Katja Schulz: Amoeba is the singular. Amoebe (US) or Amoebae (UK) is the plural and hence sometimes used as the name of the group. I guess Amoebas might be useful english common name too. I think nowadays it's probably usually used to refer to the group Amoebozoa

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Yan Wong: Btw., Wikipedia goes straight to the moth genus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amoebe Isn't is usually "amoebA" in English, rather than "amoebE?"

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Yan Wong: Hm, there goes the hypothesis that common names trump scientific names in the search algorithm. Looks like here it's the other way around. Obviously, it's not as simple as that. It also couldn't be page richness, because the moth genus has a much lower score than the protist group. I'll put in a direct path for this keyword for now.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Curators":

    The top hit here http://eol.org/search?q=amoebe&search=Go should probably be the second in the list

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Jeremy Rice who took this action.

    Jeremy Rice commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Katja Schulz: FTR: Indeed, our search currently looks up each term in the string individually, and each one of them needs to be long enough. Definitely room for improvements. :D

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Michаel Frаnkis who took this action.

    Michаel Frаnkis commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Katja Schulz: Excellent, thanks! That would be a big help.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Michаel Frаnkis: Not entirely sure how it works, but it apparently looks at different parts of a name independently. We'll put all this on our list of things to consider when the search algorithm gets revised. I'm not sure when this will happen, though.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Michаel Frаnkis who took this action.

    Michаel Frаnkis commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Katja Schulz: Sorry, not sure why that should be? After all, Ara c isn't a one letter combination, it's a four letter combination, or five if the space is included as a 'letter' (which it should be). Maybe the search system is failing to include spaces, and if so, could that be changed?

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Michаel Frаnkis: I imagine there is a trade-off here with the efficiency of the search. We've got gazillions of names, and a two letter combination matches a much larger set of names than a three letter combination. Requiring at least three letters to initiate the search probably reduces the load on the system.

    about 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Michаel Frаnkis who took this action.

    Michаel Frаnkis commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Katja Schulz: Thanks! I guessed that would be the reason. Would it not be possible to prioritise scientific names over common?

    A somewhat related problem is that when entering a genus name and the start of a species name, the search won't offer a drop-down until at least three letters of the species name have been added: enter "Ara", the drop-down appears, but then it vanishes on adding a space, and won't reappear with "c" or "ch" but only once "chl" has been added, when Ara chloropterus finally appears. This is a nuisance when one can remember the first letter or two of a species name in a large genus, but can't remember the exact spelling of the rest of the name.

    about 2 years ago