My activity
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck, 1822):
Family Ampullariidae, not Viviparidae Likely Pomacea maculata, not P. canaliculata
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Caramujo-aruá (Pomacea canaliculata) desovando:
Reasons to Untrust: Misidentified
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Ampullaria ampullacea (Linné):
Reasons to Untrust: Misidentified, Incorrect/misleading information
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck, 1822):
Reasons to Untrust: Misidentified, Incorrect/misleading information
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Pomacea canaliculata:
Reasons to Untrust: Misidentified, Incorrect/misleading information
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Pomacea paludosa:
Reasons to Untrust: Misidentified, Incorrect/misleading information
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Caramujo aruá (Pomacea canaliculata) desovando:
I suggest changing the caption to read Pomacea sp. as it could be one of three or four different species from Rio Grande do Sul.
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Caramujo aruá (Pomacea canaliculata) desovando:
Reasons to Untrust: Incorrect/misleading information, Other
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Caramujo aruá (Pomacea canaliculata) desovando:
Uncertain identification and it is redundant
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Caramujo aruá (Pomacea canaliculata) desovando:
Reasons to Untrust: Redundant/duplicate, Other
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Pomacea paludosa:
Reasons to Untrust: Misidentified, Incorrect/misleading information, Redundant/duplicate
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Pila polita (Deshayes, 1830):
Possibly Pila polita.
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Caramujo aruá (Pomacea canaliculata) desovando:
Identity uncertain.
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Caramujo aruá (Pomacea canaliculata) desovando:
Uncertain identity. Not possible to tell from this image if this is P. canaliculata. It could one of several species that occur in this southern region of Brazil.
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on "Pomacea canaliculata Lamarck, 1828":
The correct year of authorship for P. canaliculata is 1822, and the correct year for the genus Pomacea is 1810, not 1811
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Pomacea paludosa:
Not Pomacea paludosa, possibly P. insularum or P. canaliculata.
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Pomacea paludosa:
Not Pomacea paludosa, possibly P. insularum or P. canaliculata.
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Pomacea paludosa:
These are likely the eggs of Pomacea insularum. Definitely not the eggs of Pomacea paludosa
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Pomacea canaliculata:
Not P. canaliculata. This is Pomacea guyanensis.
-
Kenneth Hayes commented on an older version of Ampullaria ampullacea:
The genus Ampullaria is not valid.
