Add a new comment
-
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
Lacks detail found in another range text object here for this species.
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "National Distribution":
Low information content text object that merely reports information in other text objects here. Also obscures the narrow range limits within California.
-
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
Duplicative to other range text object information on eol for this species. However, it also overstates the endemic range which is within the Sierra Nevada of California.
-
-
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "National Distribution":
Misleading, since range is narrowly restricted to Ohio forests of Maui.
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Distribution":
Less detail than other entries and thus duplicative.
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "National Distribution":
Misleading in that it ignores Mexico distribution. Vague, in that it is not so specific as another text object here. Duplicative of other text objects here..
-
cuttersgoose commented on "Thalia geniculata L.":
Beautiful! I hope that everyone's weekend was both great and safe!
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
Offers less information content to another similar range text object, and is thus generally duplicative.
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Distribution":
More range detail given in another text object here.
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "National Distribution":
Duplicative to other range text objects on eol, but has lesser detail
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
duplicates information present in other text objects for this taxon on eol. this species is in fact a narrow endemic to Santa Cruz Island of California.
-
Cyndy Parr commented on "EOL Discussion Group":
@Yan Wong: We reharvest from Wikimedia Commons about once a week, so the change should eventually propagate to us. If it doesn't, let us know.
-
Yan Wong commented on "EOL Discussion Group":
Does the EoL wikipedia scraping code revise currently existing EoL content depending on changes to wikipedia? I've just found this photo: http://eol.org/data_objects/17272302 which is the result of an accidental inclusion of the wrong species into the Wikipedia image gallery for Tremarctos ornatus. I've removed it from the gallery on wikipedia, but I don't know if I need to flag it up as misidentified on EoL too, or if my changes to wikipedia will propagate down to EoL.
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
Lacks detail of another text object here for this taxon, indicating that the species is actually endemic to California and restricted to a limited subcoastal region from Central California to the San Francisco Bay Area.
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "National Distribution":
Covered adequately and more completely in other text objects for this taxon on eol
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Distribution":
Distribution is actually further south, as attested by other text object here.
