C. Michael Hogan

Physicist

The EOL Profile Newsfeed contains comments left for its owner by other members, EOL Community invitations, and gathers updates associated with the items in the owner's EOL watch list.

Add a new comment

  • Profile picture of Peter Preus who took this action.

    Peter Preus commented on "Asplenium septentrionale (L.) Hoffm.":

    Der Name auf deutsch ist "Nordischer Streifenfarn".

    about 21 hours ago

  • Profile picture of Jakob Fahr who took this action.

    Jakob Fahr commented on "EOL Curators":

    Hi everyone! I've added a bunch of synonymies and proposed changes, could someone carry these out where deemed appropriate? http://eol.org/users/77958/newsfeed/comments

    2 days ago

  • Profile picture of Jennifer Hammock who took this action.

    Jennifer Hammock commented on "Ailurus fulgens":

    Either photo is a perfectly suitable exemplar. They were taken less than 100 miles apart, one at a breeding center, the other in a reserve. Since nobody has identified either photo to subspecies level, the identifiability issue is not very compelling, but even if both remain identified to species only, both still have value. One shows habitat well, the other shows features well. Neither shows dentition, the first thing an evolutionary researcher may wish to see, so I am grateful we also have the nice annotated dentition image. Regardless of which is the exemplar, it is most useful to have a variety of images on the overview tab, providing complementary information.

    2 days ago

  • Profile picture of Jennifer Hammock who took this action.

    Jennifer Hammock commented on "Ailurus fulgens":

    University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, specimen acquired from the Detroit Zoo

    2 days ago

  • Profile picture of Deniz Martinez who took this action.

    Deniz Martinez commented on "Ailurus fulgens":

    But since it IS currently still a single species, then for the present all these photos are satisfactory to identify that single species, are they not? It's true that taxonomy is not static, especially these days, but it would still seem simpler to OK photos based on the *current* status of the taxon rather than trying to guess what the *future* status might end up being. But, perhaps more importantly, as scientifically valuable as that other camera trap photo may be, the fact remains that it's a low-quality image, with the animal itself somewhat blurry. It's hardly a "five-star" image, which is what an exemplar photo is ideally supposed to be per the curation guidelines. I still respectfully submit that a high-quality image that happens to be from a zoo should trump a low-quality image that happens to be from the wild, within this narrow context of an exemplar image on what is an open-access, web-based public resource (as opposed to a strictly professional scientific database).

    2 days ago

  • Profile picture of Michаel Frаnkis who took this action.

    Michаel Frаnkis commented on "Ailurus fulgens":

    Sorry, I have to disagree there. First, the animal is not in its natural surrounds, it is in a habitat it wouldn't be seen dead in, let alone alive. Second, and more important, it is of unknown provenance. Ailurus is currently treated as a single species with two allopatric subspecies; should future research conclude that it should be divided into two (or more) taxa at species rank (a very possible scenario, that has occurred with numerous other species recently), then these zoo images become (because of their unknown provenance) untrustable, unidentifiable Ailurus species: in effect, worthless. A wild specimen with location is however identifiable by its location, and therefore, valuable.

    2 days ago

  • Profile picture of Deniz Martinez who took this action.

    Deniz Martinez commented on "Ailurus fulgens":

    Exemplar images should "best represent the taxon both biologically...and aesthetically" (from the EOL curator guidelines). Zoo photos are perfectly acceptable, and sometimes even superior in cases where few high-quality images from the wild exist. The fact that a photo was taken out in the wild does not automatically make it preferable as an exemplar image here; and indeed many of the wild photos of this particular taxon are of camera-trap quality and simply do not provide a clear detailed view of the animal itself. All IMHO of course...every curator has their own preferences and the exemplar will always be whatever the last curator to visit the page decided to change it to. :)

    2 days ago

  • Profile picture of Sarah Miller who took this action.

    Sarah Miller commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Katja Schulz: Thank you.

    3 days ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Sarah Miller: Yikes, thanks Sarah. It looks like the last harvest got stuck. I'll see if we can get this going again.

    3 days ago

  • Profile picture of Sarah Miller who took this action.

    Sarah Miller commented on "EOL Curators":

    I was just browsing and noticed that the i naturalist image collection (http://eol.org/collections/36789) has not been updated in 4 months. Any suggestions on how to refresh that collection.

    3 days ago

  • Profile picture of C. Michael Hogan who took this action.

    C. Michael Hogan commented on "National Distribution":

    true, but another text object delineates the range much sharper, and this is actually misleading to indicate USA is the range.

    7 days ago

  • Profile picture of C. Michael Hogan who took this action.

    C. Michael Hogan commented on "National Distribution":

    duplicative and yet of lesser detail than another text object here on eol.

    7 days ago

  • Profile picture of Jennifer Hammock who took this action.

    Jennifer Hammock commented on "Ailurus fulgens":

    I don't know, Michael. Doesn't the scientific value of the photo depend on the question?

    7 days ago

  • Profile picture of Phil Myers who took this action.

    Phil Myers commented on "Ailurus fulgens":

    Actually, those teeth are from a real animal, a specimen acquired from the Detroit Zoo.

    8 days ago

  • Profile picture of Michаel Frаnkis who took this action.

    Michаel Frаnkis commented on "Ailurus fulgens":

    @Rob Mutch: Hi Rob - photographically a good pic, but I don't think it's a good idea to have plastic zoo junk without source data (or subspecies information) and out of natural habitat set as an exemplar, when we do have some photos of natural specimens in the wild with locations; these are of infinitely higher scientific value ;-)

    8 days ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Katja Schulz: Thanks Katya. Dromius univestis isn't IRMNG as far as I can tell, only GBIF, but perhaps what you said also applies to GBIF. Also the last example I gave is a case where another source (biolib.cz) has the data too, but the IRMNG name still isn't imported, but maybe the biolib import happened after the IRMNG one? Incidentally, I'm hitting these when trying to map OpenTree IDs to EoL page IDs (http://yanwong.me/?page_id=1268)

    8 days ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Yan Wong: Sorry for the late reply. Had to do some research to figure this out. I think these are probably IRMNG names that don't have a taxonomicStatus, so we don't know if they are valid/accepted names or synonyms. There are over 300,000 of these names in IRMNG, and we are importing them only if we already have the name from another source.

    8 days ago

  • Profile picture of Rob Mutch who took this action.

    Rob Mutch commented on "Ailurus fulgens":

    Nice morphology shot of Red Panda dentition.

    8 days ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL Curators":

    I'm not sure if this is a curator question, but I'm coming across a large number of species that are listed on gbif/irmng that seem not to have pages on EoL. I'm unclear how EoL gets data from these sources, but I would have thought that they should be present somewhere here, even if as synonyms. How come we are missing these? Some random examples are Odontacarus mahaplagensis (http://www.gbif.org/species/6915268), Dromius univestis (http://www.gbif.org/species/5735634), Choniangium algericum (http://www.marine.csiro.au/mirrorsearch/ir_search.list_species?sp_id=11555599), and so on. There are others which are present on these databases but which have only made it to EoL via a different route, e.g. Brachistosternus andinus (http://www.marine.csiro.au/mirrorsearch/ir_search.list_species?sp_id=11622346 but only on EoL via BioLib.cz).

    10 days ago

  • Profile picture of Rob Mutch who took this action.

    Rob Mutch commented on "n212_w1150":

    Double-crested Cormorant not one of the species list on this scanned page.

    14 days ago