My activity
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Geographic Range":
text object generally accurate. could be improved to explicitly note botswana occurrence. see other text objects here to complete range detail.
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "New York State Invasive Species Information":
duplicate entry on this taxon.
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
a good start, but incomplete country listing. eg other african countries such as namibia and angola
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
in review for completeness
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on an older version of Distribution:
see other text objects here to understand complete range.
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
also occurs at least as far north as the namib desert of namibia.
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
reviewing for completeness of range
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
will make visible with note that also occurs in namibia and likely southwestern angola
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
reviewing for completeness of range
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
understates range which also includes namib and kaokoveld deserts
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
ignores large part of native range. eg europe. will let stand due to paucity of distribution data at genus level on eol
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
in review for incompleteness
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
will make public even though large part of native range is ignored. eg europe
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
in review for incompleteness
-
C. Michael Hogan commented on "Localities documented in Tropicos sources":
duplicative to more complete entries on range. misleading as it ignores broader native distribution. eg europe