Add a new comment
-
Jonathan Coddington commented on "Homonym Hunters":
Insecta Diptera Heterocheilidae Chromadorea Spirurida Heterocheilidae family group names in Diptera and Nematoda
-
Jonathan Coddington joined the community "Homonym Hunters".
-
Cyndy Parr commented on "Vombatidae":
This Vombatidae page needs a brief summary as it appears to be on the 2012 hotlist.
-
Andreas Kay joined the community "EOL Photographers".
-
Tsu Soo Tan joined the community "EOL Photographers".
-
Mike Jewell joined the community "EOL Photographers".
-
Jeff Holmes added text to "Brief Summary" on "Macropus rufus (Desmarest, 1822)".
The red kangaroo...
-
Stefan Phalagorn Bergström joined the community "EOL Curators".
-
Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":
@Michael Wunderli: If you find a source that has information about these spiders, we can try to engage them as a content partner. They would have to be willing to release their content under a creative commons license, though. In this particular example, we could grab (i.e., copy & paste manually) the original description from BHL along with a few anatomical drawings for this species (could be uploaded through our Rapid Response LifeDesk). Unfortunately, there was no habitus drawing in the original description. For many of these species it may be difficult to get anything beyond the original description, and many may never have been illustrated fully.
-
Michael Wunderli commented on "EOL Curators":
@Katja Schulz: What i meant was that for exaple here: http://eol.org/pages/1181577/details This species for example is present but has no pictures and no detail information. That was the case with most species I found on that website. Is there something we can do about that?
-
Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":
@Michael Wunderli: All the Haploclastus species are here: http://eol.org/pages/111544/overview Or is that not what you meant?
-
Michael Wunderli commented on "EOL Curators":
Check out this website, non of the species shown there are present in the eol data. http://www.exoticfauna.com/tarantulabibliography/Haploclastus.html
-
Michаel Frаnkis commented on "EOL Curators":
@Jennifer Hammock: The obvious option here is for Flickr contributors not to add pics to the EOL Flickr Group until the photo has been identified to their satisfaction. Flickr has various ID groups where unidentified organisms can be posted for identification; pics of uncertain ID could be added to those, and then added to the EOL Group later once identified.
-
Jennifer Hammock commented on "EOL Curators":
@Jason Sharp: So, Jason, supposing we create a new Admin tool and EOL admin set you as a Tructed Flickr Contributor, so by default your photos came to the platform pre-Trusted. You wouldn't need to visit them all to flip them to Trusted, BUT, if you post a flickr image or two that you would like to share with us, but you're not sure of the ID, those would come to us Trusted, like the others. It might then in a sense "be your responsibility" to visit those images and curate them to Unreviewed. I imagine that for some people this would be a lot less curation work. On the other hand, maybe it's too complicated/confusing?
-
Madeline Stager joined the community "EOL Photographers".
-
Jason Sharp commented on "EOL Curators":
@Jennifer Hammock: I am a little confused on this 'follow up'.
-
Tom Devitt joined the community "EOL Photographers".
-
Jennifer Hammock commented on "EOL Curators":
Okay, here's a followup scenario for those of you who both curate and post images via flickr: As a curator, if you had an occasional photo coming in that you weren't sure of, you *could* visit those photos yourself and mark them unreviewed. Anyone want to hazard an opinion, "sure, I'd bother to do that" or "not likely, you're lucky I have time to do one kind of activity"? Thanks!
-
