My activity
-
-
-
Nathan Wilson set "Image of Alopias vulpinus" as an exemplar on "Alopias vulpinus (Bonnaterre, 1788)".
-
-
-
-
Nathan Wilson commented on "Stipe surface - enlarged":
@Malcolm Storey: I did look at the full set of bioimages and based on that info I don't know for sure that it is or isn't Xerocomus (=Boletus) subtomentosus. That's why I marked it as "incorrect/misleading" not "misidentified". I recognized that Retiboletus ornatipes has not been recorded in the UK and I'm not suggesting that would be a better id. Given the state of the Boletaceae in general right now, I prefer to take a very conservative approach to applying names. I would be very interested to see where a sequence from this specimen lands in a phylogenetic tree.
-
Nathan Wilson marked the classification from "NCBI Taxonomy" as preferred for "Xerocomus chrysenteron".
-
-
-
Nathan Wilson marked "Fruitbody - in situ - top view" as hidden on the "Boletus subtomentosus" page.
-
Nathan Wilson marked "Fruitbody - in situ - top view" as untrusted on the "Boletus subtomentosus" page.
Reasons to untrust: incorrect/misleading -
Nathan Wilson commented on "Fruitbody - in situ - top view":
This does not seem typical of Xerocomus (=Boletus) subtomentosus. The pileus color in this shot is atypical. Looks more like Retiboletus ornatipes.
-
-
Nathan Wilson commented on "Cap surface - enlarged":
This does not seem typical of Xerocomus (=Boletus) subtomentosus. The pileus color in this shot is atypical. Looks more like Retiboletus ornatipes.
-
Nathan Wilson marked "Cap surface - enlarged" as untrusted on the "Boletus subtomentosus" page.
Reasons to untrust: incorrect/misleading -
-
Nathan Wilson commented on "Pores":
This does not seem typical of Xerocomus (=Boletus) subtomentosus. The pores in this shot are atypical.
-
Nathan Wilson marked "Pores" as untrusted on the "Boletus subtomentosus" page.
Reasons to untrust: incorrect/misleading -
