Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (8) (learn more)

Overview

Brief Summary

Setophaga striata

A medium-sized (5 inches) wood warbler, the male Blackpoll Warbler in summer is most easily identified by its gray body, streaked back and flanks, and black head with prominent white cheek patches. Female Blackpoll Warblers are dull gray overall with faint white eye-stripes. In fall and winter, both sexes become dull green-gray on the back and pale tan below. The Blackpoll Warbler primarily breeds across Alaska and north-central Canada. Smaller numbers breed in southeastern Canada, and isolated breeding populations exist in the mountains of New England and New York. The Blackpoll Warbler is a long-distance migrant, wintering in northern South America. Blackpoll Warblers breed in northern and high-mountain evergreen forests, particularly in areas where Black Spruce (Picea mariana) occurs. In winter, this species may be found primarily in humid tropical forests. Blackpoll Warblers mainly eat small invertebrates, including insects and spiders, although this species may eat fruits or berries while on migration. In appropriate habitat, Blackpoll Warblers may be observed foraging for food located on leaves, needles, and branches in the forest canopy. Birdwatchers may also listen for this species’ song, a high “zi” note repeated several times in quick succession. Blackpoll Warblers are primarily active during the day, but, like many migratory songbirds, this species migrates at night.

Threat Status: Least concern

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Unknown

Supplier: DC Birds

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution

occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

National Distribution

Canada

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Breeding

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Breeding

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: Breeding range extens from western and north-central Alaska and northwestern Canada (Mackenzie Delta) to northern Labrador and Newfoundland, and south to southern Alaska, south-central British Columbia, northern Saskatchewan, eastern New York, northern New England, and Nova Scotia. During the northern winter, this warbler occurs primarily in the Amazon basin in Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil, and Bolivia, and has been found several times in southern South America, where the species is perhaps common locally in southeastern Brazil (Ridgely and Tudor 1989). This species is an autumn transient in Bermuda, Bahamas, eastern Greater Antilles, and throughout the Lesser Antilles; spring transient in western Greater Antilles and Bahamas; casual in Central America (Stiles and Skutch 1989).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Range

Alaska and Canada; winters Colombia to Peru and w Amaz. Brazil.

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Size

Length: 14 cm

Weight: 13 grams

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Type Information

Type for Dendroica striata
Catalog Number: USNM 231288
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Birds
Sex/Stage: Male; Adult
Preparation: Skin: Whole
Collector(s): G. Hanna
Year Collected: 1911
Locality: Nushagak, Nushagak Bay, Dillingham Census Area, Alaska, United States, North America
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Birds

Source: National Museum of Natural History Collections

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Systems
  • Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Cool, wet boreal coniferous forest (primarily spruce), usually dominated by low trees; locally also mixed second growth, regenerating burns, peatlands, and alder thickets (AOU 1998). In migration in various forest, forest border, woodland, scrub, and brushy habitats (AOU 1983), clearings with scattered trees. In winter, mostly (exclusively?) on islands in and vegetation surrounding major rivers.

Nests usually are well hidden in small trees, to about 3 m above ground. Adults usually return to previously used breeding sites (Eliason 1986).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Migration

Non-Migrant: No. All populations of this species make significant seasonal migrations.

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).

Locally Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.

Late migrant in spring in Atlantic states; moves through northeast May-June (Terres 1980). Migrates from eastern North America to northern South America, nonstop or through West Indies, with most apparently not going through the southeastern U.S. before going to South America (McNair and Post 1993). Fairly common in fall in Puerto Rico, rare in spring (Raffaele 1983, Murray 1989). Present in South America mostly September-April, occasionally to May (Ridgely and Tudor 1989).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Trophic Strategy

Comments: Eats various small insects and spiders gleaned from leaves and twigs of trees; also flycatches and eats some small fruits (Terres 1980).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Population Biology

Global Abundance

>1,000,000 individuals

Comments: Global abundance estimated at 21,000,000 birds (Rich et al. 2004).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Life Expectancy

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

Maximum longevity: 8.1 years (wild)
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Joao Pedro de Magalhaes

Source: AnAge

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

Eggs laid June-July. Clutch size 3-5 (usually 4-5). Incubation at least 11 days, by female. Young tended by both sexes, leave nest at 10-12 days. (Terres 1980, Harrison 1978). Some males bigamous (Eliason 1986).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Barcode data: Dendroica striata

The following is a representative barcode sequence, the centroid of all available sequences for this species.


There are 22 barcode sequences available from BOLD and GenBank.

Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species.

See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.

AACCGATGATTATTCTCAACCAACCACAAAGACATCGGGACCCTATACCTAATTTTCGGCGCATGAGCCGGAATAGTGGGTACCGCCCTA---AGCCTCCTCATTCGAGCAGAACTAGGCCAACCCGGAGCCCTTCTGGGAGAC---GACCAAGTCTATAACGTAGTCGTCACGGCCCATGCCTTCGTAATAATTTTCTTTATAGTTATACCGATTATAATCGGAGGATTCGGAAACTGACTAGTCCCCCTAATA---ATTGGAGCCCCAGACATAGCATTCCCACGAATAAATAACATAAGCTTCTGACTACTCCCACCATCATTCCTTCTCCTTCTAGCATCCTCCACAGTTGAAGCAGGAGTAGGTACAGGCTGAACAGTGTACCCCCCACTAGCCGGTAACCTAGCCCATGCCGGAGCCTCAGTCGACCTC---GCAATCTTCTCCTTACACTTAGCCGGTATTTCCTCAATCCTCGGAGCAATTAACTTCATTACAACAGCAATTAACATGAAACCTCCTGCCCTCTCACAATACCAAACCCCACTATTCGTCTGATCAGTCCTAATCACTGCAGTCCTCCTACTCCTTTCTCTCCCAGTCCTAGCTGCA---GGAATCACAATGCTCCTCACAGATCGCAACCTCAACACCACATTCTTCGACCCCGCCGGAGGAGGAGACCCCGTCCTATATCAACATCTTTTCTGATTCTTCGGTCACCCAGAAGTCTACATCCTAATCCTCCCAGGATTTGGGATCATCTCTCACGTCGTAACATACTATGCAGGCAAAAAA---GAACCATTCGGCTACATAGGAATAGTATGAGCCATACTATCCATCGGATTCCTGGGCTTTATTGTCTGAGCCCACCACATATTCACAGTAGGAATGGACGTTGACACCCGAGCTTACTTTACATCCGCCACTATAATCATCGCCATCCCAACCGGAATCAAAGTGTTCAGCTGACTA---GCCACGCTCCACGGAGGT---ACAATCAAATGAGACCCTCCAATACTTTGAGCCCTAGGGTTCATCTTCCTGTTCACCATTGGAGGCCTCACAGGAATCGTTCTAGCAAACTCCTCACTAGACGTTGCCCTACACGATACTTACTATGTAGTTGCCCACTTCCATTATGTA---CTATCCATAGGAGCAGTATTCGCAATCTTAGCAGGCTTCACCCACTGATTCCCCCTATTCACGGGCTATACCCTCCACTCAACATGAGCCAAAGCACACTTCGGTGTAATATTCGTAGGTGTAAACCTAACCTTCTTCCCACAACACTTCCTAGGCCTGGCTGGCATGCCACGA---CGATACTCAGATTACCCAGACGCCTACACA---CTATGAAACACCATCTCCTCCGTAGGCTCACTCATCTCACTAACAGCTGTAATCATACTAGTATTTATTATCTGGGAAGCCTTCGCATCAAAACGTAAAGTA---CTGCAACCAGAACTAGCCAGCACTAAC
-- end --

Download FASTA File

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Dendroica striata

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 22
Specimens with Barcodes: 24
Species With Barcodes: 1
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2012

Assessor/s
BirdLife International

Reviewer/s
Butchart, S. & Symes, A.

Contributor/s

Justification
This species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size is extremely large, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

National NatureServe Conservation Status

Canada

Rounded National Status Rank: N5B - Secure

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N5B - Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure

Reasons: Large breeding range in North America; numerous; secure.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population Trend
Decreasing
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Long Term Trend: Increase of 10-25% to decline of 30%

Comments: Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) data indicted an Increasing trend from 1966 to 1980 (Sauer et al. 2005). Since 1980, North American BBS data indicate that this species has suffered the steepest long-term decline of any neotropical-nearctic migrant landbird (9.6 percent per year, P< 0.00, n = 59), with population declines of over 50 percent and 90 percent across breeding ranges in Alaska and Canada, respectively (Sauer et al. 2004, 2005). When the entire BBS data set is considered, the long-term trend is a nonsignificant decrease of 2.6 percent per year (1966-2005). Only in New Brunswick is this long-term trend significant (6.3% per year, P< 0.00, n = 8; Hunt and Eliason 1999, Sauer et al. 2005).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Comments: Threats include habitat loss at breeding and nonbreeding areas, in-flight collisions during migration, mortality during migration associated with increased storm frequency/severity, and climate change related habitat loss of favored riparian and bog habitats.

Habitat loss: Breeding densities declined in 20-meter riparian buffers after the surrounding habitat was removed by clearcutting in the Canadian boreal forest (Darveau et al. 1995). Degradation of red spruce and subalpine spruce-fir forests from acid rain in the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada may adversely affect this species (Darveau et al. 1995, Hunt and Eliason 1999, Moegenburg and Greenberg 2004). Deforestation on wintering grounds in lowland Amazonia may also impact the species; blackpoll warblers were considered one of the 12 species most vulnerable to extinction due to tropical deforestation (Petit et al. 1993, Petit et al. 1995).

Collisions: This species commonly collides with towers during migration (e.g., communication, wind turbines, buildings), presumably due to their attraction to lights and disorientation during night migration (Bent 1953, Ogden 1996, Hunt and Eliason 1999). Hundreds to thousands of deaths have been reported at single locations over one season (Ogden 1996). In a study of tower kills in the United States since 1949, blackpoll warblers were the seventh most commonly killed bird (of 230 reported species) with 6,304 documented dead at 32 towers (Shire et al. 2000). Of concern is the marked increase in the number of towers constructed in the United States and Canada following the growth of the cell phone industry and wind energy development (Shire et al. 2000, ADFG 2005).

Climate change: Rates of survival and productivity of trans-oceanic migrants are associated with El Niño and North Atlantic Oscillation events (Nott et al. 2002). Abundance of breeding blackpoll warblers from 1967 to 1996 was negatively correlated with the frequency and severity of storms over the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico during fall migration the previous year (Butler 2000). During this long, transoceanic flight (the longest of any North American warbler), birds may be particularly susceptible to mortality, which has been found to account for 90% of annual mortality in congeneric Black-throated Blue warbler Dendroica caerulescens (Sillett and Holmes 2002). Climate change may reduce riparian and bog habitats favored by this species through permafrost degradation and drying (ADFG 2005).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Biological Research Needs: Research needs include the following: evaluate potential threats on both breeding and wintering grounds, and assess their contribution to the observed decline; examine the role of Atlantic storm frequency on mortality during migration (Butler 2000); develop ways to reduce the frequency of tower strikes during migration (e.g., study the attractiveness of different light types to this species; Shire et al. 2000, Jones and Francis 2003); obtain better information on habitat use at migration stopover sites and on wintering grounds.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Blackpoll warbler

The blackpoll warbler (Setophaga striata) is a New World warbler. Breeding males are mostly black and white. They have a prominent black cap, white cheeks and white wing bars. The blackpoll breeds in forests of northern North America, from Alaska, through most of Canada, the Great Lakes region and New England. They are a common migrant through much of North America. Come fall, they fly South to the Greater Antilles and the Northeastern coasts of South America in a non-stop long-distance migration over open water, averaging 2500 km, one of the longest distance non-stop overwater flights ever recorded for a migratory songbird. Rare vagrants to western Europe, they are one of the more frequent transatlantic passerine wanderers.

Description[edit]

Blackpoll warbler

The blackpoll warbler is a fairly small bird which attains the weight of a ball point pen.[2]:65 However, it is one of the larger of the diverse Setophaga genus (formerly Dendroica). In the species, body length can vary from 12.5 to 15 cm (4.9 to 5.9 in) and wingspan can range from 20 to 25 cm (7.9 to 9.8 in). Body mass can vary from 9.7 to 21 g (0.34 to 0.74 oz), with an average bird anywhere between 12 and 15 g (0.42 and 0.53 oz). Among standard measurements, the wing chord is 6.6 to 8 cm (2.6 to 3.1 in), the tail is 4.5 to 5.4 cm (1.8 to 2.1 in), the bill is 0.8 to 1.2 cm (0.31 to 0.47 in) and the tarsus is 1.8 to 2 cm (0.71 to 0.79 in).[3] The summer male blackpoll warblers have dark-streaked brown backs, white faces and black crowns. Their underparts are white with black streaks, and they display two white wing bars. The adult females essentially resemble washed-out versions of the summer males, and in particular, the females lack the strong head patterns, and their crowns and faces are shades of gray. Another outstanding physical characteristic of the species are the bright orange, pink legs.

Non-breeding birds of this species have greenish heads, dark-streaked greenish upperparts and yellowish breasts, with the yellow extending to the belly in young birds. Their wing bars are always present.


Problems playing this file? See media help.

Habitat[edit]

In fall plumage

In the southern portion of their breeding range, blackpoll warblers can be found on the higher elevations of mountains in woodland or brushy areas. They also spend their summers on the wooded coastal islands of Maine and the Maritime Provinces. Farther north they have been reported throughout the boreal coniferous forest. Blackpolls breed nearer to the tundra than any other warbler.[4]

Behavior[edit]

Although fairly large for a warbler, blackpoll warblers are fairly easy to miss because of their relatively inactive foraging style and tendency to perch in dense foliage near the canopy of the trees. They are more often heard than seen, though their song is one of the highest pitched known. Their songs are simple repetitions of high tsi notes. Their calls are thin sits.

Foraging and diet[edit]

The blackpoll has a deliberate feeding style with occasional flitting, hovering and hawking around branches. They birds are primarily insectivorous. The species appears to be quite a generalist, preying on a great diversity of adult and larval insects and spiders. Documented insect prey for the species includes lice, locusts, cankerworms, mosquitoes, webworms, ants, termites, gnats, aphids and sawflies. It has been suggested that this species may be a spruce budworm specialist, but there is no obvious connection between population trends of the two species.[5] The blackpoll will opt for berries in migration and during winter. They often forage high in trees, and sometimes catch insects while in flight.

Reproduction[edit]

Their breeding habitats are coniferous woodlands, especially those in which spruce trees grow. The bird's breeding ranges extend to the taiga. Blackpoll warblers commonly nest in a relatively low site of a conifer. They lay 3–5 eggs in a cup-shaped nest, rarely up to 9. The eggs are incubated for around 12 days and the young leave the nest when they are only 10 days old, before they can fly well. Their parents feed them for a total of around two weeks. Mated females usually begin second nests right away and leave post-fledging parental duties to their mates. The high incidence of double brooding, coupled with and partly a function of low nest predation and parasitism rates, results in high annual productivity for this species.[6]

Migration[edit]

The blackpoll warbler's transoceanic flight has been the subject of over twenty-five scientific studies. Sources of data include radar observations, bird banding and weights taken, dead birds recovered from field sites and fatal obstacles.[7] It is unknown if they feed on insects while in flight.[citation needed] Blackpoll warblers have the longest migration of any species of New World warbler. This is likely the reason that they are one of the later warblers to appear in spring migration, after one or more short overwater flights and a relatively prolonged movement overland after through North America anytime from early May to mid-June. The peak of their migration is in late May, when most warblers are on their breeding grounds.

In the fall the birds migrate from their breeding grounds across the northern latitudes. They converge on the Northeastern United States south to Virginia starting in mid-August.[2]: 66 Most blackpolls fly directly from northeastern North America over the Atlantic Ocean to their winter range. Data from nocturnal accidents, banding stations and sightings have shown that blackpolls are rare autumn migrants south of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, whereas north of Cape Hatteras they are common. [8] Part of the fall migratory route of the blackpoll warbler is over the Atlantic Ocean from the northeastern United States to Puerto Rico, the Lesser Antilles, or northern South America. Island stopovers at Bermuda and other places are evidence of migratory pathways.[9] To accomplish this flight, the blackpoll warbler nearly doubles its body mass in staging areas and takes advantage of a shift in prevailing wind direction to direct it to its destination. When they fly southward over the Atlantic they burn, 0.08 g of fat every hour. This route averages 3,000 km (1,900 mi) over water, requiring a potentially nonstop flight of around 72 to 88 hours. They travel at a speed of about 27 mph (43 km/h). Blackpolls can weigh more than 20 g (0.71 oz) when they leave the United States and lose 4 or more grams by the time they reach South America. Some of the blackpolls land in Bermuda before going on. Some birds, often with lower body weights, do not make it.[2]: 72

Using a tiny light level geolocator biologists have proven that the black poll flies an average of 2540 km (2270 to 2770 km) non-stop over an average of 62 h, up to 3 days, corresponding to about41 km/h. In 2013, 37 blackpolls from Vermont and Nova Scotia carried a miniaturized geolocator weighing 0.5 g with harness on their back. The device recorded light-levels, from which longitudes and latitudes could be estimated, and in 2014 the scientists recovered five of the original 37. Four of the five birds departed from western Nova Scotia between September 25 and October 21, and traveled at speeds between 10.7 and 13.4 meters per second. The study revealed that the spring migration overland and the autumn routes overwater were "dramatically different". When the flight distance per body mass was compared to other birds, only the ruby-throated hummingbird might travel more kilometres per gram (estimated around 210-280 km/g vs. 233 km/g for blackpolls).[10]

References[edit]

  1. ^ BirdLife International (2012). "Dendroica striata". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  2. ^ a b c Baird, James (1999). Returning to the Tropics: The Epic Autumn Flight of the Blackpoll Warbler in Kenneth P. Able's Gathering of Angels. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, pp. 63–78.
  3. ^ Curson, Jon; Quinn, David and Beadle, David (1994). New World Warblers: An Identification Guide, ISBN 0-7136-3932-6.
  4. ^ Morse, Douglas H. (1979). "Habitat Use by the Blackpoll Warbler". Wilson Bulletin 91 (2): 234–243. JSTOR 4161203. 
  5. ^ Boreal Songbird Initiative : Blackpoll Warbler. Borealbirds.org. Retrieved on 2012-08-24.
  6. ^ Hunt, P. D., and B. C. Eliason. 1999. Blackpoll Warbler (Dendroica striata). In The Birds of North America, No. 431 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and The American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.C.
  7. ^ Nisbet, Ian C. T.; McNair, Douglas B.; Post, William; Williams, Timothy C. (Autumn 1995). "Transoceanic Migration of the Blackpoll Warbler: Summary of Scientific Evidence and Response to Criticisms by Murray". Journal of Field Ornithology 66 (4): 612–622. Retrieved May 21, 2011. 
  8. ^ McNair, Douglas B.; Post, William (Autumn 1993). "Autumn Migration Route of Blackpoll Warblers: Evidence from Southeastern North America". Journal of Field Ornithology 64 (4): 417–425. JSTOR 4513849. 
  9. ^ Murray BGJ (1989). "A Critical Review of the Transoceanic Migration of the Blackpoll Warbler". Auk 106 (1): 8–17. doi:10.2307/4087751. 
  10. ^ William V. DeLuca , Bradley K. Woodworth, Christopher C. Rimmer, Peter P. Marra, Philip D. Taylor, Kent P. McFarland, Stuart A. Mackenzie, D. Ryan Norris (1 April 2015). "Transoceanic migration by a 12 g songbird". Biology Letters 11 (4). doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.1045. PMID 25832815. Retrieved 3 April 2015. 

Further reading[edit]

Books[edit]

Thesis[edit]

  • Baltz ME. Ph.D. (2000). The nonbreeding season ecology of neotropical migratory birds in the dry zone of Puerto Rico. University of Missouri – Columbia, United States, Missouri.
  • Chisholm SE. M.Sc. (2005). The impact of precommercial thinning on abundance of Bicknell's Thrush and other high elevation birds. Dalhousie University (Canada), Canada.
  • Davis AK. M.Sc. (1999). The stopover ecology of migratory landbirds on Bon Portage Island, Nova Scotia. Acadia University (Canada), Canada.
  • Eliason BC. Ph.D. (1986). MATING SYSTEM, PARENTAL CARE, AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN THE BLACKPOLL WARBLER (DENDROICA STRIATA) (POLYGYNY, KENT ISLAND, NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA, BREEDING BIOLOGY). University of Minnesota, United States, Minnesota.

Articles[edit]

  • Bledsoe AH. (1988). Nuclear DNA Evolution and Phylogeny of the New World Nine-Primaried Oscines. Auk. vol 105, no 3. pp. 504–515.
  • Boag PT & Ratcliffe LM. (1979). 1ST RECORD OF A BLACKPOLL WARBLER FOR THE GALAPAGOS. Condor. vol 81, no 2. pp. 218–219.
  • Boag PT & Ratcliffe LM. (1979). Blackpoll Warbler Dendroica-Striata New-Record for the Galapagos. Condor. vol 81, no 2. pp. 218–219.
  • Boal CW, Sibley FC, Estabrook TS & Lazell J. (2006). Insular and migrant species, longevity records, and new species records on Guana Island, British Virgin Islands. Wilson Journal of Ornithology. vol 118, no 2. pp. 218–224.
  • Bosque C & Lentino M. (1987). The Passage of North American Migratory Land Birds through Xerophytic Habitats on the Western Coast of Venezuela. Biotropica. vol 19, no 3. pp. 267–273.
  • Cherry JD, Doherty DH & Powers KD. (1985). An Offshore Nocturnal Observation of Migrating Blackpoll Warblers Dendroica-Striata. Condor. vol 87, no 4. pp. 548–549.
  • Darveau M, Beauchesne P, Belanger L, Huot J & Larue P. (1995). Riparian forest strips as habitat for breeding birds in boreal forest. Journal of Wildlife Management. vol 59, no 1. pp. 67–78.
  • Davis AK. (2001). Blackpoll Warbler (Dendroica striata) fat deposition in southern Nova Scotia during autumn migration. Northeastern Naturalist. vol 8, no 2. pp. 149–162.
  • Desgranges JL & Rondeau G. (1995). CHANGES IN THE BIRD COMMUNITIES OF A BALSAM FIR WHITE BIRCH FOREST FOLLOWING AN INSECT PEST EPIDEMIC. For Chron. vol 71, no 2. pp. 201–210.
  • Deviche P, Greiner EC & Manteca X. (2001). Interspecific variability of prevalence in blood parasites of adult passerine birds during the breeding season in Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. vol 37, no 1. pp. 28–35.
  • Dowie MI. (1993). Blackpoll warbler in Shetland. British Birds. vol 86, no 5. pp. 206–209.
  • Eliason BC. (1986). Female Site Fidelity and Polygyny in the Blackpoll Warbler Dendroica-Striata. Auk. vol 103, no 4. pp. 782–790.
  • Graves GR. (1996). Hybrid wood warblers, Dendroica striata X Dendroica castanea (Aves: Fringillidae: Tribe Parulini) and the diagnostic predictability of avian hybrid phenotypes. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. vol 109, no 2. pp. 373–390.
  • Holberton RL, Wilson CM, Hunter MJ & Lee AW. (2000). An endocrine basis of different migratory strategies in long- and short-distance neotropical migrants. American Zoologist. vol 40, no 6.
  • Hunt PD & Eliason BC. (1999). Blackpoll Warbler: Dendroica striata. Birds of North America. vol 0, no 431. pp. 1–24.
  • Hussell DJT & Lambert AB. (1980). New Estimates of Weight Loss in Birds During Nocturnal Migration. Auk. vol 97, no 3. pp. 547–558.
  • Jobson GJ. (1978). BLACKPOLL WARBLER IN ISLES OF SCILLY. British Birds. vol 71, no 4. pp. 186–187.
  • Latta SC & Brown C. (1999). Autumn stopover ecology of the Blackpoll Warbler (Dendroica striata) in thorn scrub forest of the Dominican Republic. Canadian Journal of Zoology. vol 77, no 7. pp. 1147–1156.
  • McNair DB, Arendt WJ & Massiah E. (1996). Sightings of the blackpoll warbler in the West Indies during winter. Florida Field Naturalist. vol 24, no 3. pp. 81–82.
  • McNair DB, Massiah EB & Frost MD. (2002). Ground-based autumn migration of Blackpoll Warblers at Harrison Point, Barbados. Caribbean Journal of Science. vol 38, no 3-4. pp. 239–248.
  • McNair DB & Post W. (1993). Autumn migration route of blackpoll warblers: Evidence from southeastern North America. Journal of Field Ornithology. vol 64, no 4. pp. 417–425.
  • Morris SR, Holmes DW & Richmond ME. (1996). A ten-year study of the stopover patterns of migratory passerines during fall migration on Appledore island, Maine. Condor. vol 98, no 2. pp. 395–409.
  • Morse DH. (1979). Habitat Use by the Blackpoll Warbler Dendroica-Striata. Wilson Bulletin. vol 91, no 2. pp. 234–243.
  • Murray BG. (1979). Fall Migration of Blackpoll Warblers Dendroica-Striata and Yellow-Rumped Warblers Dendroica-Coronata-Coronata at Island Beach New-Jersey USA. Bird Banding. vol 50, no 1. pp. 1–11.
  • Nisbet ICT, McNair DB, Post W & Williams TC. (1995). Transoceanic migration of the Blackpoll Warbler: Summary of scientific evidence and response to criticisms by Murray. Journal of Field Ornithology. vol 66, no 4. pp. 612–622.
  • Norman DM. (1978). BLACKPOLL WARBLER IN DEVON. British Birds. vol 71, no 1. pp. 41–42.
  • Ralph CJ. (1981). Age Ratios and Their Possible Use in Determining Autumn Routes of Passerine Migrants. Wilson Bulletin. vol 93, no 2. pp. 164–188.
  • Rimmer CC, McFarland KP, Evers DC, Miller EK, Aubry Y, Busby D & Taylor RJ. (2005). Mercury concentrations in Bicknell's thrush and other insectivorous passerines in Montane forests of northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology. vol 14, no 1-2. pp. 223–240.
  • Rimmer CC & Tietz JR. (2001). An adult male Blackpoll Warbler in female-like plumage. Journal of Field Ornithology. vol 72, no 3. pp. 365–368.
  • Roberts RE & Tamborski CV. (1993). Blackpoll warbler mortality during fall migration at a tower in southeastern Florida. Florida Field Naturalist. vol 21, no 4. pp. 118–120.
  • Sabo SR. (1980). Niche and Habitat Relations in Subalpine Bird Communities of the White Mountains of New-Hampshire USA. Ecological Monographs. vol 50, no 2. pp. 241–260.
  • Stewart PA. (1986). Fall Migration of Twelve Species of Wood Warblers through Coastal Virginia USA. North American Bird Bander. vol 11, no 3. pp. 83–88.
  • Stiles FG & Campos RG. (1983). Identification and Occurrence of Blackpoll Warblers Dendroica-Striata in Southern Middle America. Condor. vol 85, no 2. pp. 254–255.
  • Swanson DL, Carlisle HA & Liknes ET. (2003). Abundance and richness of Neotropical migrants during stopover at farmstead woodlots and associated habitats in southeastern South Dakota. American Midland Naturalist. vol 149, no 1. pp. 176–191.
  • Thorup K, Ortvad TE & Rabol J. (2006). Do nearctic Northern Wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe leucorhoa) migrate nonstop to Africa?. Condor. vol 108, no 2. pp. 446–451.
  • Walley WJ. (1989). Breeding Blackpoll Warblers Dendroica-Striata in Duck Mountain Provincial Park Manitoba Canada. Canadian Field Naturalist. vol 103, no 3. pp. 396–397.
  • Whitaker DM, Carroll AL & Montevecchi WA. (2000). Elevated numbers of flying insects and insectivorous birds in riparian buffer strips. Canadian Journal of Zoology. vol 78, no 5. pp. 740–747.
  • Wigh RJ. (2003). Blackpoll Warbler at sea. Oriole. vol 68, no 3-4.
  • Woodrey MS & Moore FR. (1997). Age-related differences in the stopover of fall landbird migrants on the coast of Alabama. Auk. vol 114, no 4. pp. 695–707.

-->

Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: Phylogenetic analyses of sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA (Lovette et al. 2010) indicate that all species formerly placed in Dendroica, one species formerly placed in Wilsonia (citrina), and two species formerly placed in Parula (americana and pitiayumi) form a clade with the single species traditionally placed in Setophaga (ruticilla). The generic name Setophaga has priority for this clade (AOU 2011).

Banks and Browning (1995) rejected the name Dendroica breviunguis for this species, but others have used it in the past (Hunt and Eliason 1999). Burleigh and Peters (1948) described morphological variation in eastern and western birds and proposed subspecies Dendroica striata lurida (western) and D. s. striata (eastern); Parkes (1954) subsequently refuted this distinction, and subsequently no subspecies were recognized by the American Ornithologists' Union (AOU 1957).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!