Overview

Brief Summary

Taxonomy

In 1888 Sir Walter Buller opposed his fellow ornithologists in asserting that piopio belonged to a distinct evolutionary lineage. He opted to make Turnagra the type of a new family, Turnagridae.Questions surrounding the taxonomy and evolutionary relationship of the piopio are still hotly debated, but recently:
  • Turnagridae was recognised as a separate family (Gill, 2010)
  • 2 species of Turnagra, were recognised based on plumage differences following Oliver (1955) and Holdaway et al (2001)
Historically, the genus Turnagra has been placed within several different families and often as a genus ‘incertae cedis’ near the Pachycephalinae - an ancient Australo-Papuan radiation of songbirds known as the whistlers.However, a DNA study by Christidis et al (1996) provided evidence that Turnagra was basal to the bowerbirds and suggested that it be retained in its own family and placed in sequence before the bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchidae (Gill, 2010).The most recent published taxonomy for the group is as arranged in Gill (2010):†Turnagridae Buller, 1888: History of the Birds of N.Z. 2nd edition 1:30 - Type genus Turnagra Lesson, 1837
Turnagra tanagra (Schlegel, 1866) North Island Piopio
Turnagra capensis capensis (Sparrman, 1787) South Island Piopio
Turnagra capensis minor (J H Fleming, 1915) Stephens Island PiopioBirds from the Stephens Island population are distinctive in their plumage and small size, and were thus recognised as a separate subspecies in Gill (2010) following Medway (2004).† extinct
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Natural History Museum, London

Supplier: Natural History Museum

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comprehensive Description

Biology

We can learn a great deal from studying extant specimens in museum collections, but much of the most important information on piopio breeding and behaviour comes from the contemporary accounts published in the Victorian literature.Potts’s (1873) description of nesting sheds considerably light on the potential problems caused by introduced predators to a bird whose environment had previously been largely predator free. He states:"Not much secretiveness is displayed in the choice of a site for its nest, which may be found at varying distances above the ground, from 4 to 12 feet and upwards, usually at 7 or 8 feet. The structure is firmly and compactly built, with small sprays for the foundation, on which moss is abundantly interwoven with pliant twigs; the lining is usually of fine grass-bents, though some nests are finished off with soft tree-fern down, and are usually placed in Tutu (Coriaria), sometimes in Coprosma or Leptospermum."Piopio were highly territorial in the breeding season.The female laid poorly camouflaged eggs, which are described as oval, white (sometimes with a delicate pinkish tinge) and variably spotted and blotched with brown, grey, black and even purplish patches which often formed a zone round the large end (Potts 1873).Eggs were incubated in December and when the young hatched they had a "covering of dark brown" (Potts 1873).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Natural History Museum, London

Supplier: Natural History Museum

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Introduction

The first recorded observation of the South Island piopio was by Johann Reinhold Forster (1729–1798) and his son Johann Georg Adam Forster (1754–1794) at Dusky Bay in South Island, New Zealand during Captain James Cook's second voyage. It was formally described in 1787 by Anders Sparrman.The South Island or Stephens Island piopio, Tunagra capensis, is tragically 1of 58 bird species that have become extinct in the New Zealand biological archipelago since humans arrived in the 13th century (Tennyson and Martinson 2006).When settlers first arrived, the piopio was a common bird, at least on the South Island. Like so many of its compatriots, the primary cause of the bird’s extinction was introduced predators like cats, dogs, brown rats, ferrets and weasels.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Natural History Museum, London

Supplier: Natural History Museum

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution

Range Description

Turnagra capensis, according to Buller, was common until 1863 on the South Island, New Zealand, from where it is known from numerous specimens1. However, the species declined very rapidly in the 1880s, and the last sight record was from 19633.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Historic Range:
New Zealand

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
It was observed foraging in native forest undergrowth.

Systems
  • Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Behavior

Behaviour

Turnagra capensis was a notoriously tame and inquisitive bird - individuals hopped around the undergrowth of the forest floor eating berries, seeds, insects and even carrion.They were famous for their ability to mimic other birds’ calls and were regarded as "the best of the native singing birds" (Tennyson and Martinson 2006).One of the reasons they were mistakenly referred to as thrushes - together with a superficial and misleading resemblance - was their habit of hopping around on the ground, grubbing for food amongst the detritus of the forest floor. They were also known to fly from the "top of a tree after insects, flycatcher-fashion, in the glow of a hot afternoon" (Potts 1873).Their territoriality, rather than their omnivorous diet, probably accounts for the infamous recorded incidences of extraordinary aggression - for example, a captive piopio was reported to have killed two parakeets and attempted to eat the head of one (Fuller 1987).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Natural History Museum, London

Supplier: Natural History Museum

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
EX
Extinct

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2008

Assessor/s
BirdLife International

Reviewer/s
Bird, J., Butchart, S.

Contributor/s

History
  • 2004
    Extinct
  • 2000
    Extinct
  • 1994
    Extinct
  • 1988
    Extinct
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Current Listing Status Summary

Status: Endangered
Date Listed: 06/02/1970
Lead Region: Foreign (Region 10) 
Where Listed:


Population detail:

Population location: entire
Listing status: E

For most current information and documents related to the conservation status and management of Turnagra capensis , see its USFWS Species Profile

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Extinction

At the earliest stage of European settlement, piopio were numerous and "might be found in any bushy place not too far from water, where belts of shrubs afforded shelter and abundance of seeds", but numbers were apparently declining rapidly by the 1870s. One of New Zealand’s most ardent pioneering conservationists, Thomas Henry Potts (1873) noted:"...ten years at least have passed since we heard of its occurrence in this neighbourhood (Governor’s Bay on Banks’s Peninsula); it is now scarce in the bush-dotted gullies of the Malvern Hills, the Thirteen-mile Bush, Alford Forest, and in many other localities where it was not very uncommon. Let an enthusiastic naturalist now traverse these places in quest of our feathered philosopher, he will find he has become a rara avis indeed."In the absence of predators, piopio were trusting of humans and were successfully kept as cage birds, with eggs being laid in captivity up to the early 1900s.A lack of momentum, comprehension and, most notably, predator-free sanctuaries derailed plans to conserve the species, and by the early 1900s it was effectively extinct.Small, isolated populations of Turnagra capensis capensis may have survived until the mid 1900s, with 2 being reported as late as 1949 at Lake Hauroko (Fuller 1987).Turnagra capensis capensis minor was still apparently abundant in 1894, but was decimated by introduced cats by 1898 (Tennyson and Martinson 2006).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Natural History Museum, London

Supplier: Natural History Museum

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Threats

Major Threats
Its extinction was probably mainly due to predation by introduced rats1, but habitat destruction is likely to have been a contributing factor.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

South Island Piopio

The South Island Piopio, Turnagra capensis, also known as the New Zealand Thrush, was a passerine bird of the Turnagridae family, found only in New Zealand.

Contents

Taxonomy

Photo of a T. c. capensis nest

Two subspecies are recognized, the nominate T. c. capensis from the South Island mainland, and the much smaller Stephens Island Piopio (T. c. minor) from Stephens Island, which is often considered to be based on juvenile birds, but seems to be valid (Medway, 2004b). The assumption of the well-flying bird evolving into a distinct subspecies on the small (2.6 km²) island close (3.2 km) to the mainland seems hard to believe, but Stephens Island must have held a population of many hundred birds in 1894 (Medway, 2004a), and the Piopio was apparently a reluctant flyer, not usually being found on offshore islands.

For a long time the South Island Piopio was considered conspecific with the North Island Piopio that dwelled on New Zealand's North Island, but later they were recognised as two distinct species due to pronounced differences in external appearance and osteology (Olson et al., 1983).

Description

This medium-sized bird was mostly olive-brown in colouration, with rufous wings and tail, and a speckled breast. The South Island piopio was considered to be one of the best song birds native to New Zealand. South Island piopios were omnivorous, and relatively unafraid of humans, as they have been recorded as taking scraps of food from campers.

Extinction

The South Island Piopio was once considered common in undergrowth forests of New Zealand's South Island, until 1863 when the population began to decline. The Piopio continued to decline at a rapid rate throughout the 1880s mainly due to predation by cats and rats introduced to the island by humans, as well as some habitat destruction. By 1888 the bird was said to be the rarest in all of New Zealand, and by 1905 it was considered virtually extinct. The last confirmed specimen was shot at Oharu in 1902, although alleged sightings continued. For example, unconfirmed South Island Piopio records exist from near Patea in 1923, between Gisborne and Wairoa on May 7, 1947, in Nelson district, January 1948 (all in Allison et al., 1949), and on December 17, 1947, at Lake Hauroko (Dunckley & Todd, 1949). The last supposed sighting was in 1963.

Stephens Island subspecies

Illustration of the two species - South Island Piopio on right

The Stephens Island population became extinct, apparently in 1897, due to predation by feral cats which had multiplied to number in the hundreds by that time (see also Stephens Island Wren for a detailed chronology). The last specimen was taken on January 7, 1897, and there were none left by the end of 1898 (Medway, 2004a). Only 12 specimens of the Stephens Island bird exist today:

The last 3 are the only ones with reliable dates, having been taken in 1894, 1895 and 1897, respectively.

Lice of the genus Brueelia were found on South Island piopio (Palma, 1999).

References

  1. ^ BirdLife International (2008). Turnagra capensis. In: IUCN 2008. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 21 July 2011.
  • Allison, J. V. et al.. (1949): Classified summarised notes. New Zealand Bird Notes 3(4): 88-106. PDf fulltext
  • BirdLife International (2004). Turnagra capensis. 2006. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN 2006. www.iucnredlist.org. Retrieved on 11 May 2006. Database entry includes justification for why this species is listed as extinct
  • Dunckley, J. V. & Todd, E. M. (1949): Birds West of Waiau River. New Zealand Bird Notes 3(6): 163-164. PDF fulltext
  • Fleming, J. H. (1915): A new Turnagra from Stephens' Island, New Zealand. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 28: 121-124.
  • Medway, David G. (2004a): The land bird fauna of Stephens Island, New Zealand in the early 1890s, and the cause of its demise. Notornis 51(4): 201–211. PDF fulltext
  • Medway, David G. (2004b): Taxonomic status of the Stephens Island piopio (Turnagra capensis). Notornis 51(4): 231–232. PDF fulltext
  • Olson, Storrs L.; Parkes, K. C.; Clench, M. H. & Borecky, S. R. (1983): The affinities of the New Zealand passerine genus Turnagra. Notornis 30(4): 319–336. PDF fulltext
  • Palma, Ricardo L. (1999): Amendments and additions to the 1982 list of chewing lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) from birds in New Zealand. Notornis 46(3): 373–387. PDF fulltext
  • Sparrman, Anders (1787): [Description of Turnagra capensis] In: Museum Carlsonianum, in quo novas et selectas aves, coloribus ad vivum brevique descriptiones illustratas 2(45), plate 45.
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!