The following bibliography has been generated by bringing together all references provided by our content partners. There may be duplication.

References

  • Ando, H., T. Seki & W. B. Schofield. 1989. Generic distinctness of Brotherella and Pylaisiadelpha (Musci). Bryologist 92: 209–215.
  • Ando, H., T. Seki & W. B. Schofield. 1989. Generic distinctness of ~Brotherella~ and ~Pylaisiadelpha~ (Musci). Bryologist
  • Crosby M.R. (ed) (2013). MOST: Moss TROPICOS Database (version 1, Jul 2004). In: Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 11th March 2013 (Roskov Y., Kunze T., Paglinawan L., Orrell T., Nicolson D., Culham A., Bailly N., Kirk P., Bourgoin T., Baillargeon G., Hernandez F., De Wever A., eds). Digital resource at www.catalogueoflife.org/col/. Species 2000: Reading, UK.
  • Crosby, M. R. & o. REVISED. 1999. REVISED: accepted in a monograph, revision, or descriptive flora since 1963. In Checklist Mosses. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
  • Crosby, M. R. and others - REVISED. 1999. REVISED: accepted in a monograph, revision, or descriptive flora since 1963. Checklist Mosses
  • Fleischer, M. 1914. Laubmoose. Nova Guinea 12: 109–128.
  • Fleischer. 1914. Nova Guinea
  • Ignatov, M. S. & O. M. Afonina (Editors). 1992. Checklist of mosses of the former USSR. Arctoa
  • Ignatov, M. S. & O. M. Afonina. 1992. Checklist of mosses of the former USSR. Arctoa 1: 1–85.
  • Iwatsuki, Z. 1991. Cat. Mosses Japan
  • Iwatsuki, Z. 1991. Cat. Mosses Japan 182 pp. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
  • Noguchi, A., Z. Iwatsuki & T. Yamaguchi. 1994. Ill. Moss Fl. Japan
  • Noguchi, A., Z. Iwatsuki & T. Yamaguchi. 1994. Ill. Moss Fl. Japan 5. Pp. 1013–1253. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
  • Nova Guinea 12(2): 120. 1914. (Nova Guinea)
  • Tan, B. C. & J. Yu. 1999. A preliminary revision of Chinese Sematophyllaceae. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 86: 1–70.
  • Tan, B. C. & Jia Yu. 1999. A preliminary revision of Chinese Sematophyllaceae. J. Hattori Bot. Lab.

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!