The following bibliography has been generated by bringing together all references provided by our content partners. There may be duplication.

References

  • A. J. E. Smith. 1992. J. Bryol.
  • Abramov, I. I. & A. L. Abramova. 1983. Konspekt flor'i mhov Mongol'skoj Narodnoj Respubliki. Biol. Resursy Prir. Uslov. Mongol'sk. Narod. Respubl.
  • Abramov, I. I. & A. L. Abramova. 1983. Konspekt flor'i mhov Mongol'skoj Narodnoj Respubliki. Biol. Resursy Prir. Uslov. Mongol'sk. Narod. Respubl. 17. 221 pp.
  • Allen, B. 2002. Moss flora of Central America, Part 2. Encalyptaceae--Orthotrichaceae. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.
  • Allen, B. 2002. Moss flora of Central America, Part 2. Encalyptaceae--Orthotrichaceae. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 90. viii + 699 pages.
  • Anderson, L. E., H. A. Crum & W. R. Buck. 1990. List of mosses of North America north of Mexico. Bryologist
  • Anderson, L. E., H. A. Crum & W. R. Buck. 1990. List of mosses of North America north of Mexico. Bryologist 93: 448–499.
  • Antherton I, Bonsanquet S, Lawley M 2010. Mosses and Liverworts of Britain and Ireland. A Field Guide. British Bryological Society.
  • Bequaert J 1921. On the dispersal by flies of the spores of certain mosses of the family Splachnaceae. The Bryologist 24: 1–4
  • Bescherelle in Renauld & Cardot. 1905. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique
  • Bowers, F. D. 1970. High elevation mosses of Costa Rica. J. Hattori Bot. Lab.
  • Bowers, F. D. 1970. High elevation mosses of Costa Rica. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 33: 7–35.
  • Bowers, F. D. 1974. The mosses reported from Costa Rica. Bryologist
  • Bowers, F. D. 1974. The mosses reported from Costa Rica. Bryologist 77: 150–171.
  • Brotherus & Paris. 1909. Oefvers. Forh. Finska Vetensk.-Soc.
  • Brotherus. 1902. Nat. Pflanzenfam.
  • Brotherus. 1909. Nat. Pflanzenfam.
  • Bruch & W. P. Schimper in B.S.G. 1844. Bryol. Eur.
  • Bruch, P. & W. P. Schimper. 1844. Fasc. 23--24. Oediodium, Tayloria, Dissodon, Tetraplodon, Splachnum, Orthodntium, Mielichhoferia. In Bryol. Eur. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart.
  • Bruch, P., W. P. Schimper & W. T. Gümbel. 1836--1855. Bryol. Eur. 5 vol. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart.
  • Bruch, P., W. P. Schimper & W. T. von Gümbel. 1836-1855. Bryol. Eur.
  • Bryologia Europaea 3: 215 (fasc. 23–24. Monogr. 5). 1844. (Bryol. Eur.)
  • C. Müller. 1851. Syn. Musc. Frond.
  • C. Müller. 1879. Linnaea
  • C. Müller. 1896. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital., n.s.,
  • Cardot. 1910. Rev. Bryol.
  • Cardot. 1913. Rev. Bryol.
  • Churchill, S. P. & E. L. Linares C. 1995. Prodromus bryologiae Novo-Granatensis: introducción a la flora de musgos de Colombia. Parte 2: Grimmiaceae a Trachypodaceae. Bibliot. José Jerónimo Triana 12: 455–924.
  • Conard, H. S. & J. P. L. Redfearn. 1979. How Know Mosses (ed. 2) viii + 302 pages.
  • Corley, M. F. V., A. C. Crundwell, R. Düll, M. O. Hill & A. J. E. Smith. 1981 [1982]. Mosses of Europe and the Azores: an annotated list of species, with synonyms from the recent literature. J. Bryol. 11: 609–689.
  • Crosby M.R. (ed) (2013). MOST: Moss TROPICOS Database (version 1, Jul 2004). In: Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 11th March 2013 (Roskov Y., Kunze T., Paglinawan L., Orrell T., Nicolson D., Culham A., Bailly N., Kirk P., Bourgoin T., Baillargeon G., Hernandez F., De Wever A., eds). Digital resource at www.catalogueoflife.org/col/. Species 2000: Reading, UK.
  • Crosby, M. R. & o. REVISED. 1999. REVISED: accepted in a monograph, revision, or descriptive flora since 1963. In Checklist Mosses. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
  • Crosby, M. R. and others - REVISED. 1999. REVISED: accepted in a monograph, revision, or descriptive flora since 1963. Checklist Mosses
  • Crum, H. & L. E. Anderson. 1981. Mosses E. N. Amer.
  • Crum, H. & L. E. Anderson. 1981. Mosses E. N. Amer. 1. 663 pp. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Crum, H. 1983. Mosses Great Lakes Forest (ed. 3) 417 pp. University Herbarium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • D. Mohr. 1806. Ann. Bot. (Konig & Sims)
  • Eddy, A. Splachnobryaceae to Leptostomataceae. Handb. Males. Mosses. 3. [iv] + 277 pp.
  • Fleischer. 1923. Musci Buitenzorg
  • Florschütz-de Waard, J. & P. A. Florschütz. 1979. Estudios sobre criptógamas Colombianas III. Lista comentada de los musgos de Colombia. Bryologist
  • Florschütz-de Waard, J. & P. A. Florschütz. 1979. Estudios sobre criptógamas Colombianas III. Lista comentada de los musgos de Colombia. Bryologist 82: 215–259.
  • Goffinet B, Shaw A J, Cox C J 2004. Phylogenetic inferences in the dung-moss family Splachnaceae from analyses of CPDNA sequence data and implications for the evolution of entomophyly. American Journal of Botany 91: 748–759
  • Grout, A. J. 1933-1940. Moss Fl. N. Amer.
  • Grout, A. J. 1933-1940. Moss Fl. N. Amer. 2: 1–284. Author, Newfane, Vermont.
  • Hill M O, Preston C D, Smith A J E, eds. 1994. Atlas of the bryophytes of Britain and Ireland. Volume 3. Mosses (Diplolepideae). Colchester: Harley Books
  • Ignatov, M. S. & O. M. Afonina (Editors). 1992. Checklist of mosses of the former USSR. Arctoa
  • Ignatov, M. S. & O. M. Afonina. 1992. Checklist of mosses of the former USSR. Arctoa 1: 1–85.
  • Ireland, R. R. 1982. Moss flora of the Maritime Provinces. Publ. Bot. (Ottawa)
  • Ireland, R. R. 1982. Moss flora of the Maritime Provinces. Publ. Bot. (Ottawa) 13. 738 pp.
  • Ireland, R. R., G. R. Brassard, W. B. Schofield & D. H. Vitt. 1987. Checklist of the mosses of Canada II. Lindbergia
  • Ireland, R. R., G. R. Brassard, W. B. Schofield & D. H. Vitt. 1987. Checklist of the mosses of Canada II. Lindbergia 13: 1–62.
  • Iwatsuki, Z. & W. C. Steere. 1975. Notes on the Himalayan Splachnaceae. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 39: 345–361.
  • Iwatsuki, Z. 1972. Geographical isolation and speciation of bryophytes in some islands of eastern Asia. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 35: 126–141.
  • Iwatsuki, Z. 1991. Cat. Mosses Japan
  • Iwatsuki, Z. 1991. Cat. Mosses Japan 182 pp. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
  • J. Fröhlich. 1953. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien
  • Ketchledge, E. H. 1980. Revised checklist of the moses of New York State. New York State Mus. Bull.
  • Ketchledge, E. H. 1980. Revised checklist of the moses of New York State. New York State Mus. Bull. 440.
  • Kis, G. 1985. Mosses South-east Trop. Africa 170 pp. Institute of Ecology and Botany of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Vácrátót.
  • Koponen A. 1990. Entomophily in the Splachnaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 104: 115–127
  • Koponen, A. 1982. The family Splachnaceae in Australasia and the Pacific. J. Hattori Bot. Lab.
  • Koponen, A. 1982. The family Splachnaceae in Australasia and the Pacific. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 52: 87–91.
  • Koponen, A. 1983. Studies on the generic concept in the classification of the moss family Splachnaceae. Publ. Dept. Bot. Univ. Helsinki 11. 48 pp.
  • Lawton, E. 1971. Moss Fl. Pacif. N.W. xiii + 362 pp. + 195 pl. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichi-nan, Japan.
  • Li Xing-jiang & Zang Mu. 1979. Acta Bot. Yunnan.
  • Menzel, M. 1992. Preliminary checklist of the mosses of Peru (Studies on Peruvian Bryophytes IV). J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 71: 175–254.
  • Noguchi, A. & Z. Iwatsuki. 1988. Ill. Moss Fl. Japan
  • Noguchi, A. & Z. Iwatsuki. 1988. Ill. Moss Fl. Japan 2. Pp. 243–491, index. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
  • Nyholm, E. 1989. Ill. Fl. Nord. Mosses
  • Nyholm, E. 1989. Ill. Fl. Nord. Mosses 2. Pp. 75–141. Nordic Bryological Society, Copenhagen & Lund.
  • O'Shea, B. J. 2006. Checklist of the mosses of sub-Saharan Africa (version 5, 12/06). Trop. Bryol. Res. Rep. 6: 1–252.
  • Peterson, W. L., D. K. Smith & A. J. Sharp. 1980. The mosses of the Kokiak Archipelago. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 47: 269–285.
  • Porley R P, Hodgetts N G 2005. Mosses and Liverworts. Collins New Naturalist Series.
  • Weber, W. A. 1973. Guide to the mosses of Colorado. Keys and ecological notes based on field and herbarium studies. Occas. Pap. Inst. Arctic Alpine Res. 6: iii + 48 pages.
  • Worley, I. A. & Z. Iwatsuki. 1970. A checklist of the mosses of Alaska. Bryologist 73: 59–71.

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!