Overview
Brief Summary
Diversity
Approximately 1900 species grouped into 104 genera are known from all major regions of the world except Antarctica (DePrins, J and W. accessed 1 April 2009)
Trusted
Distribution
Geographical Distribution
Nearctic, Palearctic, Oriental, Ethiopian, Neotropical, Australian, Oceanic Island
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Egg morphology
smooth
Orientation:
flat
Egg mass pattern:
Eggs usually deposited singly on epidermis of host plant; rarely laid in a short transverse row of 4-8 contiguous eggs.
Description of egg morphology:
Usually oval to elliptical, partially flattened underneath and slightly convex above with nearly smooth to finely sculptured chorion, sometimes with upper and lower halves different in texture; less than 0.5 mm in length. Micropyle area finely reticulated, often reduced in size.
Trusted
Larvae Morphology
absent
Body setae on verrucae:
absent
Body setae on chalazae:
absent
Body setae on scoli:
absent
Larval body description:
Body usually not exceeding 10 mm in length, variable in color depending upon species and instar, from white to green, with some species becoming bright red prior to pupation, with or without darkly pigmented head and sclerotized plates.
Spinneret:
present
Thoracic glands:
absent
Thoracic legs:
present, absent
Larval Prothoracic L-group setae:
bisetose
Abdominal glands:
absent
Abdominal prolegs:
present, absent
Proleg configuration:
normal, odd
Proleg size:
short
Crochets:
uniserial, multiserial, arranged in circle
Anal comb on A10:
absent
Trusted
Pupa/Cocoon morphology
adecticous
Pupa description:
Head usually with a serrated or acute frontal process (cocoon cutter) from vertex, or smoothly rounded. Antennae extending to abdominal segment 6 (A6) to well beyond A10. Wings to A5-6. Tergal spines variably developed, usually small to minute in multiple, irregular rows or dense concentrations on A2 or 3-7 or 8; Phyllocnistis often with a few pairs of large tergal hooks on A2-7. A4-7 moveable in male, A4-6 in female (Mosher 1916). Cremaster highly variable, usually present as small paired spines, often with recurved apices. An accessory cremaster sometimes variably developed on sternum 7.
Pupal tergal spines:
present
Spines as modified cremaster:
present, absent
Cremaster:
present
Cocoon:
present
Trusted
Adult Abdomen Morphology
Ditrysian
Oviscapt (ovipositor):
non-piercing
Female genitalia description:
Oviscapt short, with usually 2 pairs of moderately short, rarely elongate apophyses; anterior apophyses sometimes reduced or absent. Ostium on S8 or at caudal margin; sterigma sometimes well sclerotized and variously modified. Ductus bursae usually elongate, slender, either membranous or partially sclerotized, expanding anteriorly into membranous corpus bursae; signa usually of 1-2 pairs, or sometimes absent.
Female corethrogyne:
absent
Female pregenital sexual scales:
absent
Female accessory glands:
one pair
Female oviduct opening:
below anus
Female bursa ostium opening:
on venter 8
Female anterior apophyses originating:
originating from T8
Male coremata:
present
Male pregenital sexual scales:
present, absent
Male genitalia description:
Uncus absent. Tegumen a relatively elongate, mostly membranous dorsal hood. Vinculum U- to Y - shaped, with often a short, rarely elongate saccus. Subscaphium frequently distinct, variably sclerotized. Gnathos absent. Transtilla present or absent. Valvae usually elongate and simple, rarely asymmetrical, sometimes lobed, spined, or with 1-2 pairs of pectinifers. Anellus usually membranous. Juxta absent. Aedoeagus usually elongate and slender; cornuti present or absent. Male genitalia with 4 pairs of muscles, M 1 absent (Kuznetsov and Stekol nikov, 1987).
Sternum 5:
without fenestra
Sternum 5 gland:
absent
Adult abdomen description:
Sternum 2 long and narrow, with long slender sternal apodemes continuing caudad as sternal rods ca. 0.8 the length of sternite. Segment 8 and sometimes 7 of male frequently with paired coremata; Sternum 8 of female often enlarged, particularly in Lithocolletinae; Tergum 8 sometimes with median sclerotization; corethrogyne absent.
Male has:
phallotheca and aedeagus (phallus)
Trusted
Adult Thorax Morphology
absent
Epiphysis:
present
Adult thorax description:
Metafurca with anteromedial process elongate, relatively slender; furcal apophyses free, short to moderately long and downcurved, arising well caudad near secondary arms.
Forelegs:
normal
Leg description:
Legs with tibial spur pattern usually 0-2-4; epiphysis rarely absent.
Forewing length from base of forewing to the apex (mm):
from 2 to 10
Wing venation:
heteroneurous
Forewing anal vein notation:
A
Forewing basal loop:
absent
Forewing pterostigma:
absent
Forewing chorda:
present, absent
Forewing upper surface with microtrichia:
absent
Hindwing anal vein notation:
1A + 2A
Hindwing cell vein:
unforked
Hindwing pterostigma:
absent
Wing coupling:
with frenulum
Wing scales:
hollow
Forewing description:
Forewings slender; W/L ratio 0.9-0.25; venation variable with R/Rs 3- to 5-branched; Rs4 usually to costa, rarely to apex; Ml- to 3-branched; Cu 1 sometimes absent; discal cell elongate, extending 0.7-0.8 the length of forewing; accessory cell vestigial to absent; base of M vestigial to absent; intercalary cell absent; 1 A + 2 A usually present, sometimes vestigial, occasionally with minute basal fork; male retinaculum usually formed of curved scales from underneath slightly swollen base of Sc;
Hindwing description:
Hindwing lanceolate; index 0.1-0.2; female frenulum usually with 2 frenular setae, rarely 1; stout, composite pseudofrenular setae sometimes arising near apex of Sc in both sexes (Davis 1991); venation reduced, from 7 to 4 veins; discal cell often open.
Trusted
Tympanum Morphology
absent
Abdomen tympanum:
absent
Thorax tympanum:
absent
Palp tympanum:
absent
Trusted
Adult Head Morphology
absent
Eyes:
smooth
Labial palpus:
porrect, upcurved
Labial palpus modification:
Labial palpi 3-segmented, usually upturned, to straight and drooping; segment 2 sometimes with ventral scale tuft.
Maxillary palpus:
present, minute
Proboscis:
present
Proboscis texture:
naked
Proboscis description:
Haustellum usually elongate, 1-2X length of labial palpi.
Mandibles:
absent
Head vertex scaling:
very rough, very smooth
Female antennae:
filiform
Male antennae:
filiform
Antennal sensillum:
Antennal sensillum present
Sensillum vesiculocladum:
absent
Asciod sensilla:
absent
General antennae description:
Antennae 0.8-1.75 the length of forewing; scape usually smooth, with or without pecten; flagellum filiform, with a single row of slender scales completely encircling each segment.
Adult head description:
Head vestiture variable, usually smooth (in Gracillariinae) with moderately broad scales from vertex directed forward and down over frons; similar in Lithocolletinae except with tufts of erect filiform and sometimes broader scales arising from occiput caudad to vertex. Eyes moderately large; interocular index 0.9-1.0.
Trusted
Diagnostic Description
Synapomorphies
Hypermetamorphic larval development (Kumata 1978).. Early instar larvae specialized for sapfeeding in plant tissue; later instar(s) usually generalized tissue feeders, or sometimes nonfeeding silk spinning larvae in final instar.. Tissue feeding larval instars usually with prolegs absent on abdominal segment 6.
Trusted
Ecology
Associations
Known prey organisms
Atriplex canescens
Atriplex polycarpa
Based on studies in:
USA: California, Southern California (Galls, Plant substrate)
This list may not be complete but is based on published studies.
- B. A. Hawkins and R. D. Goeden, 1984. Organization of a parasitoid community associated with a complex of galls on Atriplex spp. in southern California. Ecol. Entomol. 9:271-292, from p. 274.
Trusted
Life History and Behavior
Reproduction
Life History: Immature Stages
Pupation usually in a small, whitish silken cocoon either outside the mine of the host plant (most Gracillarinae) or within the mine (most Lithocolletinae and all Phyllocnistinae).
Larval food habits description:
Most species of Gracillariidae are leafminers, others mine the subepidermal layers of new growth stems and fruits or bore inside stems and galls (Davis 1991). Early sap-feeding instars with slashing mandibles typically feed in a horizontal plane, initiating slender, subepidermal serpentine mines while ingesting relatively little solid tissue. In some genera (e. g. Phyllonorycter) the sap-feeding instars instead initiate a blotch mine by devouring mostly spongy parenchymal cells (Watson 1956). Tissue-feeding instars possess typical chewing mandibles that enable these larvae to feed deeper into the host, usually ingesting the remainder of the spongy parenchyma and most of the palisade cells within the blotch. Later tissue-feeding instars of the most primitive genera (Gracillariinae) tend to exit the mine and feed externally, often in a rolled-over leaf.
Life history larvae:
Larval Gracillariidae undergo hypermetamorphic development (Kumata 1978; Davis 1987) with at least 2 distinct forms and habits: (1) an early, usually sap-feeding (Tragardh 1913) or flattened (Chambers 1877) form, often comprising the first 2-5 instars, with a depressed, apodal body with specialized, prognathous mouthparts and rudimentary spinneret, and (2) a later hypognathous, tissue-feeding or cylindrical form, possessing a more generalized, eruciform body with unspecialized, chewing mouthparts and legs; or a variously modified nonfeeding spinning form, with either a depressed or cylindrical body, mandibles and legs reduced or absent, but with a functional spinneret. An additional nonfeeding, transitional stage is also interposed between the final sap-feeding and single spinning instars of Chrysaster, Dendrorycter, and Marmara (De Gryse 1916; Kumata 1978). Moreover, in the latter two genera the quiescent instar exists in a pharate condition within the cuticle of the last sap-feeding instar. Later instar larvae of Gracillariidae are further characterized by 2 prespiracular (L) setae on T1 and crochets, if present, on A3-5 and 10 and almost always absent on A6 (present on A3-6 in Artifodina, Prophyllocnistis, and on A2-6 in Metriochroa psychotriella, Davis, 1994). Number of in stars varies from 4-11, depending upon genus and sometimes species (Fitzgerald and Simeone 1971).
Trusted
Evolution and Systematics
Evolution
Systematic and taxonomic history
The Gracillariidae constitute the principal family of plant mining Lepidoptera. Fossil leafmines of Gracillariidae (Phyllocnistinae) are known from the early Cenomanian of the Dakota Formation in Kansas and Nebraska (ca. 97 m. y. a.; Davis 1994; Labandeira et al. 1994) near the beginning of the Angiosperm radiation. This currently represents the earliest fossil record of any ditrysian moth assignable to family. Three or four subfamilies are recognized: Gracillariinae: Adults of most genera rest with anterior part of body raised at steep angle. Head usually smooth. Hindwings with base of Rs arched toward costa and approaching apex of Sc (Ely 1918; Kumata 1978). Abdomen of ♂ usually with S8 membranous; coremata usually present. Last instar larva with fully developed mandibles and legs, 5 coxal setae, and A9 with D group bisetose. Pupation usually outside of mine. Representative genera: Acrocercops, Aristaea, Caloptilia, Epicephala, Macrostola, Parectopa, Parornix, Philodoria, Stomphastis. Lithocolletinae: Adults rest with body parallel to surface or with head end lowered. Head usually with occipital tufts of piliform scales. Hindwings with Rs nearly parallel to costal margin. Abdomen of ♂ with S8 sclerotized, elongate; coremata absent. Last instar larva usually with fully developed mandibles and legs (both reduced in Cameraria), 4 coxal setae, and A9 with D unisetose. Pupation normally within blotch mine. Representative genera: Cameraria, Chrysaster, Cremastobombycia, Leucanthiza, Phyllonorycter (= Lithocolletis). Phyllocnistinae: Adults rest with body parallel to surface. Head smooth. Hindwings with Rs closely parallel to costal margin. Abdomen of ♂ with S8 membranous; coremata usually present. All feeding instars sap-feeding, creating elongate serpentine, subepidermal mines; last instar larva non-feeding with mandibles absent, legs reduced to unsegmented stubs, A9 with D bisetose. Pupation within slightly enlarged cavity at termination of mine. Representative genera: Cryphiomystis, Metriochroa, Phyllocnistis, Prophyllocnistis). A fourth subfamily, OECOPHYLLYMBIINAE, has been redefined reently by Kumata (1998) to include all genera listed above within Phyllocnistinae except Phyllocnistis.
Trusted
Fossil Record
Fossil records from J. and W. DePrins 2006: Gracillariites lithuanicus Kozlov, 1987. Fossil in Eocene Amber (Lithuania). Gracillariites mixtus Kozlov, 1987; Fossil in Eocene amber. (Baltic States). Caloptilia sp. probably on a Quercus leaf (Miocene), U.S.A., Idaho, Latah Formation (Lewis 1969: 1210-1211, Opler 1973: 1322). Cameraria sp. on Lithocarpus and Quercus simulata Knowlt. (middle to upper Miocene), U.S.A., Idaho, Thorn Creek (Opler 1973: 1321). Phyllonorycter sp. on an unidentified fossil leaf (upper Eocene), Canada, British Columbia, White Lake Basin (Freeman 1965: 1069). A leaf mine resembling Phyllocnistis has been reported on fossil Cedrela leaves from the early Eocene in the Sheridan Pass area southwest of Dubois, Wyoming, U.S.A. (Hickey and Hodges 1975: 718). phyllocnistine leaf mines on a magnoliid dicot from the Dakota Formation of Kansas and Nebraska (U.S.A.) that date to the Early Cenomian (97 m.y.a.) (Labaneira et al, 1994, Davis 1994: 65). Phyllonorycter sp. on Quercus hanibalii Dorf (late middle Miocene), U.S.A., Nevada, Cedar Mountains, Upper Goldyke (Opler 1973: 1321). Phyllonorycter sp. on Populus trichocarpa var. ingrata (Jeps.) Parish (upper Miocene), U.S.A., Nevada, Stewart Valley (Opler 1973: 1321).
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Barcode
Locations of barcode samples
Trusted
Statistics of barcoding coverage
| Specimen Records: | 6,522 |
| Specimens with Sequences: | 4,456 |
| Specimens with Barcodes: | 3,947 |
| Public Records: | 915 |
| Species: | 750 |
| Species With Barcodes: | 556 |
Trusted
Wikipedia
Gracillariidae
Gracillariidae is an important family of insects in the order Lepidoptera and the principal family of leaf miners that includes several economic, horticultural or recently invasive pest species such as the horse-chestnut leaf miner, Cameraria ohridella.
Contents |
Taxonomy and systematics
There are 98 described genera of Gracillariidae (see below). A complete checklist is available of all currently recognised species (de Prins and de Prins 2005). There are many undescribed species in the tropics but there is also an online catalogue of Afrotropical described species [1]; the South African fauna is quite well known. Although Japanese and Russian authors have recognised additional subfamilies (de Prins and de Prins, 2005), there are three currently recognised subfamilies, Phyllocnistinae of which is likely to be basal. In this subfamily, the primitive genus Prophyllocnistis from Chile feeds on the plant genus Drimys (Winteraceae), and has leaf mines structurally similar in structure to fossils (Davis, 1994) (see "Fossils"). While there have been some recent DNA sequence-based studies of Palaearctic species (Lopez-Vaamonde et al., 2003, 2006), there is need for a satisfactory modern global phylogenetic framework for the subfamilies of Gracillaridae. Some genera are very large, e.g. Acrocercops, Caloptilia, Cameraria, Epicephala and Phyllonorycter.
Distribution
Gracillariidae occurs in all terrestrial regions of the World except Antarctica.
Identification
These generally small (wingspan 5–20 mm.) moths and are leaf miners as caterpillars[2] which can provide a useful means of identification especially if the hostplant is known. The subfamilies differ by the adult moth resting posture (Davis and Robinson, 1999). Most Gracillariinae rest with the front of the body steeply raised; Lithocolletinae and Phyllocnistinae rest with the body parallel to the surface, or in Lithocolletinae often with the head lowered.
Life history
The first to fifth-instar larvae are flattened and possess specialised mouthparts adapted for feeding on sap. Older-instar larvae are cylindrical and have normal chewing mouthparts for feeding on plant tissue within the leaf mines, and have a fully functional silk-producing organ the "spinneret". Some genera have an intermediate stage in this remarkable hypermetamorphosis (Davis and Robinson, 1999).
Larval hostplants
Many hostplants are known, generally dicotyledonous trees or shrubs [3]. Patterns of hostplant shifting have been inferred for many United Kingdom species in the genus Phyllonorycter and its sister genus Cameraria (Lopez-Vaamonde et al., 2003). Another recent DNA sequencing study mainly of Palaearctic species has shown that the burst of evolutionary adaptive radiation occurred long after that of the larval hostplants, rather than demonstrating a tight coevolutionary process (Lopez-Vaamonde et al., 2006).
Fossils
The family is an old one, with fossil Phyllocnistinae mines known from 97 million old rocks in Kansas and Nebraska (Labandeira et al. 1994). There are other fossil mines known from rocks of Eocene and Miocene age (de Prins and de Prins, 2005). There are also two adult moths are known from Lithuanian or Baltic amber of Eocene age: Gracillariites lithuanicus Kozlov, 1987 and G. mixtus Kozlov, 1987) (de Prins and de Prins, 2005).
Subfamilies and genera
- Phyllocnistinae Herrich-Schäffer, 1857
- Corythoxestis Meyrick, 1921
- =Cryphiomystis Meyrick, 1922
- Eumetrichroa Kumata, 1998
- Guttigera Diakonoff, 1955
- Metriochroa Busck, 1900
- =Oecophyllembius Silvestri, 1908
- Phyllocnistis Zeller, 1848
- Prophyllocnistis Davis, 1994
- Gracillariinae Stainton, 1854
- Gracillaria Haworth, 1928
- =Gracilaria Zeller, 1839
- =Gracilaria Walsingham, 1907
- =Xanthospilapteryx Spuler, 1910
- Acrocercops Wallengren, 1881
- Africephala Vári, 1986
- Amblyptila Vári, 1961
- Apistoneura Vári, 1961
- Apophthisis Braun, 1915
- Aristaea Meyrick, 1907
- Artifodina Kumata, 1985
- Aspilapteryx Spuler, 1910
- =Sabulopteryx Triberti, 1985
- Borboryctis Kumata & Kurokoo, 1988
- Callicercops Vári, 1961
- Callisto Stephens, 1834
- =Annickia Gibeaux, 1990
- Caloptilia Hübner, 1825
- =PoeciloptiliaHübner, 1825
- =Ornix Collar, 1832
- =Ornix Treitschke, 1833
- =Coriscium Zeler, 1839
- =Calliptilia Agassiz, 1847
- =Timodora meyrick, 1886
- =Antiolopha Meyrick, 1894
- =Sphyrophora Vári, 1961
- =Phylloptilia Kumata, 1982
- =Rhadinoptilia Kumata, 1982
- =Minyoptilia Kumata, 1982
- =Cecidoptilia Kumata, 1982
- Calybites Hübner, 1822
- Chilocampyla Busck, 1900
- Chrysocercops Kumata & Kuroko, 1988
- Conopobathra Vári, 1961
- Conopomorpha Meyrick, 1885
- Conopomorphina Vári, 1961
- Corethrovalva Vári, 1961
- Cryptolectica Vári, 1961
- Cryptologa Fletcher, 1921
- Cupedia Klimesch & Kumata, 1973
- Cuphodes Meyrick, 1897
- Cyphosticha Meyrick, 1907
- Dekeidoryxis Kumata, 1989
- Dendrorycter Kumata, 1978
- Deoptilia Kumata & Kuroko, 1988
- Dextellia Triberti, 1986
- Dialectica Walsingham, 1897
- Diphtheroptila Vári, 1961
- Dysectopa Vári, 1961
- Ectropina Vári, 1961
- Epicephala Meyrick, 1980
- =Iraina Diakonoff, 1955
- =Leiocephala Kuznetzov & Baryschnikova, 2001
- Epicnistis Meyrick, 1906
- Eteoryctis Kumata & Kuroko, 1988
- Eucalybites Kumata, 1982
- Eucosmophora Walsingham, 1897
- Euprophantis Meyrick, 1921
- Eurytyla Meyrick, 1893
- Euspilapteryx Stephens, 1835
- Gibbovalva Kumata & Kuroko, 1988
- Graphiocephala Vári, 1961
- Hypectopa Diakonoff, 1955
- Ketapangia Kumata, 1995
- Lamprolectica Vári, 1961
- Leucanthiza Clemens, 1859
- Leucocercops Vári, 1961
- Leucospilapteryx Spuler, 1910
- Liocrobyla Meyrick, 1916
- Macarostola Meyrick, 1907
- Marmara Clemens, 1863
- Melanocercops Kumata & Kuroko, 1988
- Metacercops Vári, 1961
- Micrurapteryx Spuler, 1910
- Monocercops Kumata, 1989
- Neurobathra Ely, 1918
- Neurolipa Ely, 1918
- Neurostrota Ely, 1918
- Oligoneurina Vári, 1961
- Ornixola Kuznetzov, 1979
- Pareclectis Meyrick, 1937
- Parectopa Clemens, 1860
- Parornix Spuler, 1910
- =Alfaornix Kuznetzov, 1979
- =Betaornix Kuznetzov, 1979
- =Deltaornix Kuznetzov, 1979
- =Gammaornix Kuznetzov, 1979
- Penica Walsingham, 1914
- Philodoria Walsingham, 1907
- =Euphilodoria Zimmermann, 1978
- Phodoryctis Kumata & Kuroko, 1988
- Phrixosceles Meyrick, 1908
- Pleiomorpha Vári, 1961
- Pogonocephala Vári, 1961
- Polydema Vári, 1961
- Polymitia Triberti, 1986
- Polysoma Vári, 1961
- Psydrocercops Kumata & Kuroko, 1988
- Sauterina Kuznetzov, 1979
- Schedocercops Vári, 1961
- Semnocera Vári, 1961
- Spanioptila Walsingham, 1897
- Spulerina Vári, 1961
- Stomphastis Meyrick, 1912
- Synnympha Meyrick, 1915
- Systoloneura Vári, 1961
- Telamoptilia Kumata & Kuroko, 1988
- Lithocolletinae Stainton, 1854
- Cameraria Chapman, 1902
- Chrysaster Kumata, 1961
- Cremastobombycia Braun, 1908
- Hyloconis Kumata, 1963
- Macrosaccus Davis and De Prins, 2011
- Neolithocolletis Kumata, 1963
- Phyllonorycter Hübner, 1822
- =Lithocolletis Hübner, 1825
- =Eucestis Hübner, 1825
- =Hirsuta Fletcher, 1929
- Porphyrosela Braun, 1908
- Protolithocolletis Braun, 1929
- Subfamily Oecophyllembiinae (disputed)
- Angelabella Vargas & Parra, 2005
- Subfamily unassigned
- Chileoptilia Vargas & Landry, 2005
- †Gracillariites Kozlov, 1987
- Unplaced species
- "Ornix" blandella Müller-Rutz, 1920, this species was described from Switzerland. Larvae were recorded feeding on Salix. The present taxonomic status is unknown.
- "Gracilaria" confectella Walker, 1864
- "Gracilaria" delicatulella Walker, 1864
- "Phyllonorycter" fennicella Hering, 1924, this species was described from Finland. The larval hostplant is probably a Salix species. The present taxonomic status is unknown, but is probably a junior subjective synonym of Lithocolletis viminetorum or Lithocolletis salictella.
- "Lithocolletis" graeseriella Sorhagen, 1900, see Phyllonorycter
- "Lithocolletis" italica Herrich-Schäffer, 1855, this species was described from Italy. The present taxonomic status is unknown.
- "Ornix" jyngipennella Heydenreich, 1851, nomen nudum.
- "Lithocolletis" lativitella Sorhagen, 1900, this species was described from Germany. Larvae were recorded feeding on Sorbus aria and Pyrus scandinavica. The present taxonomic status is unknown. It might be a synonym of Tinea lantanella Schrank, 1802.
- "Lithocolletis" norvegicella Strand, 1919, this species was described from Norway. The present taxonomic status is unknown.
- "Gracillaria" pistaciella Rondani, 1876, this species was described from Italy. Larvae were recorded feeding on Pistacia terebinthus.
- "Ornix" quercella Müller-Rutz, 1934, this species was described from Switzerland. Larvae were probably bred from a mine on a Quercus species. The present taxonomic status is unknown.
- "Phyllonorycter" sessilifoliella Hering, 1957, this species was recorded from southern France, where it was said to have been reared on a Quercus species. nomen nudum
References
- Davis, D.R. (1994). "New leaf-mining moths from Chile, with remarks on the history and composition of Phyllocnistinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)". Tropical Lepidoptera 5 (1): 65–74.
- Davis, D.R, and Robinson, G.S. (1999). The Tineoidea and Gracillarioidea. In: Kristensen, N.P. (ed.), Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies, 1: Evolution, Systematics, and Biogeography. Handbuch der Zoologie 4 (35): 91-117. Walter de Gruyter. Berlin, New York.
- de Prins, W., and de Prins, J. (.2005). Gracillariidae (Lepidoptera). World Catalogue of Insects, Volume 6. Apollo Book, Stenstrup. ISBN 87-88757-64-1.
- Labandeira, C.C., Dilcher, D.L., Davis, D.R. and Wagner, D.L. 1994. Ninety-Seven Million Years of Angiosperm-Insect Association: Paleobiological Insights into the Meaning of Coevolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91(25): 12278-12282. pdf
- Lopez-Vaamonde, C., Godfray, H.C.J. and Cook, J.M. (2003). Evolutionary dynamics of host-plant use in a genus of leaf-mining moths. Evolution, 57(8): 1804-1821. Abstract
- Lopez-Vaamonde, C., Wikström, N., Labandeira, C., Godfray, H.C.J., Goodman, S.J. and Cook, J.M. 2006. Fossil-calibrated molecular phylogenies reveal that leaf-mining moths radiated millions of years after their host plants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19 (4): 1314-1326.Abstract
Unreviewed
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!


