Overview
Brief Summary
Summary
Download the full article on the IUCN Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group site
- Dodd, C.K., Jr. 2008. Sternotherus depressus Tinkle and Webb 1955 – flattened musk turtle. In: Rhodin, A.G.J., Pritchard, P.C.H., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A., Buhlmann, K.A., and Iverson, J.B. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs No. 5, pp. 013.1-013.7, doi:10.3854/crm.5.013.depressus.v1.2008, http://www.iucn-tftsg.org/cbftt/.
Trusted
Biology
Trusted
Comprehensive Description
Description
Trusted
Distribution
Range Description
Sternotherus depressus inhabits a small range in the Black Warrior River system of Alabama.
The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) have not been quantified, but the EOO is at the order of 7,000 km2 while an AOO of less than 500 linear km of streams and rivers is a realistic estimate.Trusted
Geographic Range
These turtles are currently only found in the Black Warrior River watershed above the Bankhead Dam, in Alabama. The ten Alabama counties included in this range are Blount, Cullman, Etawah, Fayette, Jefferson, Lawrence, Marshall, Tuscaloosa, Walker and Winston.
Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native )
Trusted
National Distribution
United States
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
Trusted
Global Range: Historically restricted to upper Black Warrior River system, northern Alabama, upstream from Fall Line; largest known population is in Sipsey Fork in north-central Alabama (Dodd 1988); USFWS considers populations unaffected by hybridization to be restricted presently to areas upstream from Bankhead Dam (USFWS 1987). Ernst et al. (1988) suggested that populations in west-central Alabama, previously regarded as intermediate between DEPRESSUS and MINOR (Mount 1975), are referable to DEPRESSUS.
Trusted
Distribution: USA (N Alabama)
Type locality: "Mulberry Fork of the Black Warrior River, 9 miles east of Jasper, Walker County, Alabama, near the bridge crossing of U.S. Highway 78".
Trusted
Distribution
![]() |
| Distribution of Sternotherus depressus in Alabama, USA. Red points = museum and literature occurrence records based on published records plus more recent and author’s data; green shading = projected distribution based on GIS-defined hydrologic unit compartments (HUCs) constructed around verified localities and then adding HUCs that connect known point localities in the same watershed or physiographic region, and similar habitats and elevations as verified HUCs (Buhlmann et al., unpubl. data), and adjusted based on author’s data. |
- Dodd, C.K., Jr. 2008. Sternotherus depressus Tinkle and Webb 1955 – flattened musk turtle. In: Rhodin, A.G.J., Pritchard, P.C.H., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A., Buhlmann, K.A., and Iverson, J.B. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs No. 5, pp. 013.1-013.7, doi:10.3854/crm.5.013.depressus.v1.2008, http://www.iucn-tftsg.org/cbftt/.
Trusted
Range
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Physical Description
Sternotherus depressus ranges from about 3 to 4 inches (7.5 - 10 cm) in carapace length; record in 4.6 in (11.7 cm). When compared with other musk turtles, Sternotherus depressus has a carapace that is quite flattened. The top of the carapace is brown and the small plastron is either pinkish or yellowish-brown. The head and neck are greenish with a network of dark lines around them, and there are barbels located on the chin (Conant and Collins 1998).
Trusted
Size
Ecology
Habitat
Habitat and Ecology
Sternotherus depressus is a nearly exclusively aquatic freshwater turtle, inhabiting medium-sized clean clear-water streams and small rivers with abundant rocky crevice cover-sites and preferably extensive snail populations.
Flattened musk turtles feed predominantly on freshwater snails and (introduced) clams, also taking some aquatic insects and their larvae (Marion et al. 1991).
Males reach sexual maturity at four to six years, females at six to eight years of age, at about 65 mm carapace length (CL). Females reach their maximum size of 12.0 cm at 30-40 years of age, males at 50-60 years (Close and Holmes in Dodd 2008). Mature females produce an average of two clutches of one to three eggs annually. Hatchlings measure 31-33 mm CL (Dodd 2008). Generation time is unknown but estimated at estimated 20-30 years.
Systems
- Terrestrial
- Freshwater
Trusted
Habitat
This turtle is mostly found in clear, shallow streams above the fall line. Rocky to sandy-bottomed streams are preferred (Ernst, Lovich, and Barbour 1994).
Aquatic Biomes: rivers and streams
Trusted
Comments: Optimal habitat free-flowing creek or small river with pools about 1 m deep or more, hiding places among rocks, abundant mollusks, low silt load and deposits, moderate temperature; also impoundments with similar characteristics (Mount 1981). Preferred habitat seems to be clear, rock-bottomed to sandy, permanent streams above fall line (Ernst and Barbour 1989). Extensive sand deposits were major physical component of most high density sites (Ernst et al. 1989).
Trusted
Habitat
Trusted
Migration
Non-Migrant: No. All populations of this species make significant seasonal migrations.
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.
Trusted
Trophic Strategy
Food Habits
The flattened musk turtle feeds underwater on invertebrates such as snails and mussels. Large adult musk turtles have expanded jaws for crushing mollusks.
Trusted
Comments: Mollusks are the primary food, though other invertebrates also may be eaten (Mount 1975). Diet mainly clams (including the introduced Asiatic clam), snails, insects, crayfish, arachnids, and isopods; feces also sometimes contain seeds (Ernst and Barbour 1989, Marion et al. 1991).
Trusted
Population Biology
Number of Occurrences
Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.
Estimated Number of Occurrences: 1 - 5
Trusted
General Ecology
Commonly parasitized by leeches (Placobdella parasitica) (Dodd 1988).
Trusted
Life History and Behavior
Cyclicity
Comments: Active from April to October. Adults mainly nocturnal; juveniles more likely to be active by day but also more active with darkness (Ernst et al. 1989).
Trusted
Reproduction
Reproduction
Females come out of the water and deposit their eggs in shallow nests dug into the ground near the stream. Each female chooses a different site. Clutch size appears small; two eggs are reported in one clutch. Eggs are oblong, about 32 mm long, with brittle shells. The incubation period is probably dependent on temperature and perhaps other physical factors, but ranges from 45 to 122 days. Once hatching begins the actual emergence from the egg takes anywhere from 12 hours to two days. The hatchling has a carapace length of about 26 mm. Growth to maturity may take four to six years for males, and six to eight years for females (Ernst, Lovich, and Barbour, 1994).
Trusted
Lays 1-2 clutches of about 3 eggs in spring and summer. Males sexually mature in 4-6 years, females in 6-8 years (Mount 1981).
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Molecular Biology
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Sternotherus depressus
Public Records: 0
Species: 1
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
IUCN Red List Assessment
Red List Category
Red List Criteria
Version
Year Assessed
Assessor/s
Reviewer/s
Contributor/s
Justification
History
- 1996Vulnerable
- 1994Vulnerable(Groombridge 1994)
- 1990Vulnerable(IUCN 1990)
- 1988Vulnerable(IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1988)
- 1986Indeterminate(IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1986)
- 1982Indeterminate
Trusted
Conservation Status
These animals are sensitive to changes in streambed habitats, and especially to water quality. These musk turtles can only survive in pure waters. Sharp declines in recent decades have occurred due in part to an increase in pollution levels in their aquatic habitat. This is mainly due to coal strip mining. These turtles have also been collected in large numbers for the commercial pet trade. In February of 1986, at a Birmingham public hearing about the Fisheries and Wildlife Service's proposal to list the flattened musk turtle as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act, representatives of the coal industry claimed that listing the turtle as 'threatened" could mean an end to coal mining in the area. But the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service testified that coal mining would not be affected if the State and Federal strip-mining laws were obeyed. Strip miners are required to control discharges, and mining is barred within a certain distance of rivers. It is the lack of attention to these rules that has destroyed the flattened musk turtle's habitat as well as the valuable drinking water. Protecting the turtle would therefore also protect the quality of water for the citizens of Birmingham and northern Alabama. In June 1986 the proposal to list the Flattened Musk Turtle as threatened was accepted and became law. (Environmental Defense Fund, 1986)
US Federal List: threatened
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: vulnerable
Trusted
National NatureServe Conservation Status
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: N2 - Imperiled
Trusted
NatureServe Conservation Status
Rounded Global Status Rank: G2 - Imperiled
Reasons: Small range in the Black Warrior River system, Alabama; threatened by overcollecting, disease, and habitat degradation from sedimentation and water pollution (in part related to coal mining); habitat fragmentation and related increased vulnerability to human-caused catastrophes and demographic accidents also appear to be problems.
Trusted
Status: Threatened
Date Listed: 06/11/1987
Lead Region: Southeast Region (Region 4)
Where Listed: Black Warrior R. system upstream from Bankhead Dam
Population detail:
Population location: Black Warrior R. system upstream from Bankhead Dam
Listing status: T
For most current information and documents related to the conservation status and management of Sternotherus depressus , see its USFWS Species Profile
Trusted
Status
- Dodd, C.K., Jr. 2008. Sternotherus depressus Tinkle and Webb 1955 – flattened musk turtle. In: Rhodin, A.G.J., Pritchard, P.C.H., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A., Buhlmann, K.A., and Iverson, J.B. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs No. 5, pp. 013.1-013.7, doi:10.3854/crm.5.013.depressus.v1.2008, http://www.iucn-tftsg.org/cbftt/.
Trusted
Status
Trusted
Trends
Population
Dodd (1990) estimated that 56.3% of historically suitable habitat was degraded to the point that it had lost its S. depressus populations, 36.9% was severely degraded and contained remnant populations, and only 6.9% of original habitat remained reasonably unaffected by pollution, sedimentation and impoundments. Throughout the 1990s, populations continued to decline (Bailey and Guyer 1998), and the most recent surveys (before 2006) indicate that some viable populations remain, these were considered stable but at lower abundance than they had been in the mid-1980s (Dodd 2008).
Population Trend
Trusted
Global Short Term Trend: Decline of 10-30%
Comments: Has disappeared from more than half of former range; only 7% of probable historic range contains relatively healthy populations (Dodd 1990). Recent studies "indicate that population declines have continued, even at sites considered relatively pristine, as a result of insufficient recruitment and/or illegal collection" (Bailey and Guyer 1998). USFWS (1990) categorized the status as "unknown." See Ernst et al. (1989) for an extensive discussion of status.
Trusted
Threats
Threats
Sternotherus depressus is primarily threatened by habitat degradation and loss, and secondarily by collection and possibly disease. Siltation, from coal strip mining and improper runoff and stream bank management associated with forestry, agriculture and construction, eliminates the essential rock crevice hiding areas, reduces or eliminates molluscan prey, and may contain toxic compounds.
While the species is legally protected from collection, illegal collection for pets remains a concern (Dodd 2008).
A severe disease outbreak swept through the Sipsey Fork population in 1985-1986, more than halving its population in one year; disease was also recorded at other streams but its impact was not quantified. The diseases has been speculated to involve a compromised immune system. By 1995 the Sipsey Fork population had not yet recovered to pre-disease levels (Bailey and Guyer 1998), and Fonnesbeck and Dodd (2003) documented that a short-term modest reduction in survivorship created serious long-term consequences for the population.
Leech infestation rates are inversely correlated to environmental pollution levels (Dodd 1988).
Trusted
Comments: Portions of habitat have been eliminated by impoundments, and agricultural, residential, and industrial development; threatened by overcollecting, disease, and habitat degradation from sedimentation and water pollution (in part related to coal mining) (USFWS 1987). Habitat fragmentation and related increased vulnerability to human-caused catastrophes and demographic accidents also appear to be problems (Dodd 1990). Sipsey Fork population declined in the mid-1980s, apparently affected by disease and/or commercial collecting (Dodd 1988); a modest reduction in survival over a relatively short time period resulted in a large decline in abundance from which recovery has not occurred; lack of recovery may stem from low reproductive potential, fragmented remaining habitats, collecting, and/or herbicide contamination (Fonnesbeck and Dodd 2003).
Trusted
Threats
Trusted
Management
Conservation Actions
Sternotherus depressus is designated as Threatened in the US ESA since 1987, with no critical habitat designated. It is protected from exploitation and intentional impact by Alabama State legislation since 1984 (Code of Alabama, Section 9-11-269).
Populations are confirmed from the Bankhead National Forest including the Sipsey Wilderness Area.
Surveys have documented and monitored distribution and status since the mid-1980s.
A Recovery Plan was approved by FWS in 1990 but not funded, and no actions have resulted from its ESA inclusion.
Future desirable research include further status surveys, continued population monitoring, further investigation of disease, refined demography and population dynamics studies including genetic studies to document population fragmentation effects, telemetry studies of habitat usage and movements, mollusc prey studies, contaminant studies, and further biological / natural history research.
Conservation actions proposed include local efforts to restore stream quality in the Warrior basin, and improvement and enforcement of water quality and mining laws and regulations (Dodd 2008).
Trusted
Conservation
Trusted
Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems
Benefits
Economic Importance for Humans: Negative
This turtle is of no concern to fish management and is harmless to human interests.
Trusted
Economic Importance for Humans: Positive
The presence of this species is a good indication of the condition of the streams, as it requires clear, relatively unpolluted habitat.
Unfortunately, the Flattened Musk Turtle has had value in the pet trade, and has been heavily exploited for that reason in some parts of its small range..
Trusted
Wikipedia
Flattened musk turtle
The Flattened musk turtle (Sternotherus depressus) is a species of turtle in the Kinosternidae family. It is endemic to the United States.
Contents |
Geographic range
It is found only in northern Alabama.[2]
Description
These little turtles can be 7.5–10 cm (3-4 inches) long, record 11.4 cm (4½ inches). Both the common name and specific name refer to the fact that the species' carapace (upper shell) is much lower and flatter than the other members of the genus Sternotherus. In fact they look as if someone had accidentally stepped on them.[2]
Captivity
Individuals of this species have survived for more than 20 years in captivity.
Source
- ^ van Dijk, P.P. (2010). "Sternotherus depressus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.1. International Union for Conservation of Nature. http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/20824. Retrieved 8 October 2011.
- ^ a b Conant, Roger. 1975. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America, 2nd edition. Houghton Mifflin. Boston.
- Tortoise & Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group 1996. Sternotherus depressus. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 29 July 2007.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article about a turtle is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
Unreviewed
Names and Taxonomy
Taxonomy
Comments: Sometimes S. DEPRESSUS has been regarded as a subspecies of K. MINOR, with which DEPRESSUS has hybridized in some areas. MtDNA data indicate that S. DEPRESSUS is phylogenetically distinct from S. M. MINOR, S. M. PELTIFER, and all other kinosternid turtles in the southeastern United States (Walker and Avise 1998, Walker et al. 1998). See Ernst et al. (1988), Ernst and Barbour (1989), and Iverson (1991) for additional taxonomic information.
The genus Sternotherus was merged into the genus Kinosternon by Ernst and Barbour (1989) (based on protein electromorph data of Seidel et al. 1986). This change not adopted in subsequent taxonomic lists (King and Burke 1989, Collins 1990). However, Iverson (1991) evaluated protein and morphological data for kinosternine turtles and concluded that there presently exists no adequate basis for recognizing Sternotherus as a genus distinct from Kinosternon. Nevertheless, Ernst et al. (1994) treated Kinosternon and Sternotherus as distinct genera.
Trusted
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!





