-
Malcolm Storey commented on "Stipe surface - enlarged":
@Nathan Wilson: The photograph was taken in the UK. We don't have Retiboletus ornatipes. You need to consider it in the light of the full set of photos and description: http://www.bioimages.org.uk/html/r151305.htm I agree it's atypical.
-
Nathan Wilson marked the classification from "NCBI Taxonomy" as preferred for "Xerocomus chrysenteron".
-
Nathan Wilson marked "Fruitbody - in situ - top view" as hidden on the "Boletus subtomentosus" page.
-
Nathan Wilson marked "Fruitbody - in situ - top view" as untrusted on the "Boletus subtomentosus" page.
Reasons to untrust: incorrect/misleading -
Nathan Wilson commented on "Fruitbody - in situ - top view":
This does not seem typical of Xerocomus (=Boletus) subtomentosus. The pileus color in this shot is atypical. Looks more like Retiboletus ornatipes.
-
-
Nathan Wilson commented on "Cap surface - enlarged":
This does not seem typical of Xerocomus (=Boletus) subtomentosus. The pileus color in this shot is atypical. Looks more like Retiboletus ornatipes.
-
Nathan Wilson marked "Cap surface - enlarged" as untrusted on the "Boletus subtomentosus" page.
Reasons to untrust: incorrect/misleading -
-
Nathan Wilson commented on "Pores":
This does not seem typical of Xerocomus (=Boletus) subtomentosus. The pores in this shot are atypical.
The Newsfeed for this EOL Taxon Page gathers updates associated with items shown on it, including curator actions and comments from EOL users.
Add a new comment
Newsfeed
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!
