Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (1) (learn more)
Overview
Comprehensive Description
Comments
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Description
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Distribution
States or Provinces
UNITED STATES
| AL | AR | CO | CT | DE | FL | GA | IA | IL | IN |
| KS | KY | LA | MA | MD | MI | MO | MS | MT | NC |
| NB | NJ | NM | NY | OH | OK | PA | RI | SC | SD |
| TN | TX | VA | WI | WV |
CANADA
| ON |
Trusted
Ontario south to Florida; west to Montana and New Mexico; and east to
Massachusetts and South Carolina. Eastern pricklypear is rare in Ontario, Ohio, and Pennsylvania [49]. The Flora of North America provides a distribution map of eastern
eastern pricklypear and its varieties.
Varieties: Florida devil's-tongue only occurs in Florida. Southeastern
eastern pricklypear occurs from North Carolina south to Florida and west to Texas.
Devil's-tongue occurs throughout the general distribution range of eastern
eastern pricklypear [49,79].
- 49. Kartesz, John T.; Meacham, Christopher A. 1999. Synthesis of the North American flora (Windows Version 1.0), [CD-ROM]. Available: North Carolina Botanical Garden. In cooperation with: The Nature Conservancy, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [2001, January 16]. [36715]
- 79. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. PLANTS database (2006), [Online]. Available: http://plants.usda.gov/. [34262]
Trusted
Range and Habitat in Illinois
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Regional Distribution in the Western United States
This species can be found in the following regions of the western United States (according to the Bureau of Land Management classification of Physiographic Regions of the western United States):
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS [11]:
7 Lower Basin and Range
12 Colorado Plateau
13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont
14 Great Plains
16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands
- 11. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
China (Asia)
United States (North America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Anonymous. 1986. List-Based Rec., Soil Conserv. Serv., U.S.D.A. Database of the U.S.D.A., Beltsville.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1103
-
Voss, E. G. 1985. Michigan Flora. Part II Dicots (Saururaceae-Cornaceae). Bull. Cranbrook Inst. Sci. 59. xix + 724.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1700
-
Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Fl. Great Plains i–vii, 1–1392. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/637
-
Fernald, M. 1950. Manual (ed. 8) i–lxiv, 1–1632. American Book Co., New York.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1327
Trusted
National Distribution
Canada
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
United States
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
Trusted
Global Range: Montana, Great Lakes, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Michigan, Mas- sachusetts, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Atlantic and Gulf coasts from Massachusetts to Florida.
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Description
Trusted
Diagnostic Description
Type Information
Catalog Number: US 1326734
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany
Verification Degree: ; Original publication and alleged type specimen examined
Preparation: Pressed specimen
Collector(s): E. Wherry
Year Collected: 1927
Locality: Berks, Pennsylvania, United States, North America
- Neotype: Rafinesque, C. S. 1820. Ann. Nat. 1: 15.; Leuenberger, B. E. 1993. Taxon. 42: 426.
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Key Plant Community Associations
More info for the terms: cactus, caudex, cover, forbs, hemicryptophyte, layering, monoecious, stem succulent, succession, tree, xeric
Eastern pricklypear occurs in a variety of desert, grassland, prairie, and
woodland communities. It occurs as a community associate and not a dominant
species [9]. Brief descriptions of the common dominants and associates are
presented below.
Eastern pricklypear is commonly found in sandhill prairie communities dominated
by big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium),
and prairie sandreed (Calamovilfa longifolia). Other common
associates in these communities include Addison's rosette grass (Dichanthelium
ovale var. addisonii), goat's rue (Tephrosia virginiana),
porcupine grass (Hesperostipa spartea), Muhlenberg's sedge (Carex
muehlenbergii), sand lovegrass (Eragrostis trichodes), sand
sagebrush (Artemisia filifolia), soapweed yucca (Yucca glauca),
and western ragweed (Ambrosia psilostachya) [2,26,28,50,69,71].
In shortgrass prairies dominated by blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis)
and buffalo grass (Buchloe dactyloides), eastern pricklypear can
be one of the principal forbs [1,78,83]. Eastern prickly pear also occurs in
mixed grass prairies dominated by needle-and-thread grass (Hesperostipa comata)
and western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii) [27].
In the Texas savanna vegetation type, eastern pricklypear can occur with a
variety of associates including mesquite (Prosopis spp.), acacias (Acacia
spp.), oaks, junipers (Juniperus spp.), bluestems, indiangrass (Sorghastrum
nutans), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), gramas, buffalo grass, and
Texas tussockgrass (Nassella leucotricha) [17].
Eastern pricklypear is a common associate in a wide variety of habitat types
dominated by longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) and sand pine (P. clausa).
Overstory associates in these types include turkey oak (Quercus laevis),
bluejack oak (Q. incana), and sand live oak (Q. geminata).
Understory associates include pineland threeawn (Aristida stricta), dwarf palm (Sabal
minor), and Adam's needle (Y. filamentosa) [16,31,39,40,84].
In saw-palmetto (Serenoa repens) prairies, eastern pricklypear is
commonly found with inkberry (Ilex glabra), wiregrass, broomsedge
bluestem (Andropogon virginicus), carpet grass (Axonopus spp.) and
sand live oak [21,22].
Eastern pricklypear occurs on the drier sites in eastern redcedar (Juniperus
virginiana) glades where other associates include post oak (Q. stellata),
blackjack oak (Q. marilandica), winged elm (Ulmus alata), yaupon (I. vomitoria) [6,7,8,35].
It also occurs in
black oak (Q. velutina) savannas in Indiana [13], black
oak-eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) dunes in Michigan [61], and
turkey oak sandhills in Georgia [55].
In the upper dune zone of the beach vegetation type in Florida, southeastern
eastern pricklypear commonly occurs as an associate with aloe yucca
(Y. aloifolia) and finger rot (Cnidoscolus stimulosus) [66].
BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SPECIES: Opuntia humifusa
- GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS
- RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM
- REGENERATION PROCESSES
- SITE CHARACTERISTICS
- SUCCESSIONAL STATUS
- SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS:
This description provides characteristics that may be relevant to fire ecology,
and is not meant for identification. Several florae provide keys for identifying
eastern pricklypear [9,29,38].
Eastern pricklypear is a perennial
native mat- or clump-forming cactus usually 3 to 4 inches (7.5-10 cm) tall. It
occasionally grows to 12 inches (30 cm) in height in Florida. The succulent stem
segments, or pads, are 1.5 to 4 inches (3.8-10 cm) long and 1.6 to 2.4 inches
(4-6 cm) wide. Areoles
on the pads give rise to 0 to 2 spines that are 1 to 2.4 inches (2.5-6
cm) long. Flowers are solitary, 1 to 1.5 inches (2.5-3.8 cm) in diameter.
The fruit is a fleshy berry 1 to 1.6 inches (2.5-4 cm) long. The seeds are
flattened, orbicular,
and 0.2 inch (4.5 mm) in diameter. The root system is shallow and fibrous
[9,29,34,58]. A caudex may develop in persistent stems [19].
Physiology:
Eastern pricklypear is considered highly drought tolerant [83].
RAUNKIAER [65] LIFE FORM:
Hemicryptophyte
Stem succulent
REGENERATION PROCESSES:
Eastern pricklypear reproduces from seeds, by layering, and sprouting from detached
stem segments and the caudex [19,75,83].
Breeding system:
Eastern pricklypear is monoecious [9].
Pollination:
Eastern pricklypear is pollinated by insects [9].
Seed production:
Throughout much of its distribution, eastern pricklypear relies primarily on
seeds for reproduction [83]. Flowers and fruits are 1st produced at 2 years of
age [24].
Seed dispersal:
Seeds of eastern pricklypear are primarily spread when the fruits are eaten by birds and a
variety of rodents including rabbits, woodrats, prairie-dogs, mice, and
ground squirrels. Ground squirrels may cache the seeds, some of which are later
consumed. Cached seeds that are not eaten may germinate and produce new plants
[25,83].
Seed banking:
No further information is available on this topic.
Germination:
Germination rate is reported to be low for seeds of Opuntia species [75]. In
laboratory tests, it was found that eastern pricklypear seeds collected from rabbit fecal scats had
a higher germination rate than seeds collected from unconsumed fruits. Seeds
collected from the scats required an average germination time of 41 days and had
a germination rate of 25%. Seeds collected from non-eaten fruits required 71 days and
germinated at a rate of 18% [25].
Seedling establishment/growth:
Although the literature reports that eastern pricklypear regenerates by seeds
[9], information is lacking on the specifics of seedling establishment and
growth.
Asexual regeneration:
Layering occurs when pads still attached to the parent plant take root into soil. Detached pads
also readily root into soil [75]. The pads can disperse by attaching to animals by the spines [83].
Opuntia species can sprout from the caudex when the
aboveground portion of the plant is destroyed [19].
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Eastern pricklypear is a species that can flourish under a great range of
conditions. It is found at elevations ranging from sea level to
5,500 feet (1,576 m), will grow well on various types of soils under a wide
range of moisture regimes, and can survive extremes of both hot and cold
temperatures [9,44].
The moisture regimes in which eastern
eastern pricklypear can thrive are quite varied. For example, the cactus occurs in
extremely xeric sandstone cedar glades in Kentucky and Tennessee, but also
thrives in the saw-palmetto prairies in Florida where the water table is often
at or near the ground surface [21,35].
Eastern pricklypear is winter hardy, being able to survive on sites where
the minimum winter temperatures can drop below 10 oF (-12 oC).
The cactus avoids freeze damage by rapidly reducing the water content in cells
during cold acclimation [53].
Eastern eastern pricklypear is most commonly found on sandy or gravely soils
but can also flourish on organic detritus and silty or loamy soils. It is tolerant of
low-nutrient, acid, and alkaline soils [9].
SUCCESSIONAL STATUS:
Eastern pricklypear is shade intolerant [50] and is
generally replaced by other species in advanced stages of succession [9].
The cactus colonizes disturbed sites and may persist through
late seral stages of plant succession. It colonizes bare coastal dunes in
some areas of the Northeast [76]. On the dunes of southern
Lake Michigan, it appears in early seral stages where it invades the beachgrass
(Ammophilia breviligulata)-prairie
sandreed communities of young dunes. It is found in late seral,
shrub-populated dunes on the shores of western Lake Michigan where
it persists after the invasion of jack pine and black oak. It dies
out as dense tree canopy cover develops [61]. Eastern pricklypear
is found in "climax" sand sagebrush communities in northeastern
Colorado [64].
SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT:
Eastern pricklypear flowers from May to July [9]. Plants in Florida may
bloom year-round [87]. Fruits mature 2 to 3 months after flowering and may
persist until the following spring [9].
- 9. Benson, Lyman. 1982. The cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1044 p. [1513]
- 1. Albertson, F. W. 1937. Ecology of mixed prairie in west central Kansas. Ecological Monographs. 7: 483-547. [5057]
- 2. Anderson, Roger C.; Leahy, Theresa; Dhillion, Shivcharn S. 1989. Numbers and biomass of selected insect groups on burned and unburned sand prairie. The American Midland Naturalist. 122: 151-162. [7912]
- 6. Au, Shu-fun. 1974. Vegetation and ecological processes on Shackleford Bank, North Carolina. Scientific Monograph Series No. 6 /NPS 113. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 86 p. [16101]
- 7. Baskin, Jerry M.; Baskin, Carol C. 1978. Plant ecology of cedar glades in the Big Barren region of Kentucky. Rhodora. 80: 545-557. [45322]
- 8. Baskin, Jerry M.; Webb, David H.; Baskin, Carol C. 1995. A floristic plant ecology study of the limestone glades of northern Alabama. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 122(3): 226-242. [46869]
- 13. Betz, Robert F. 1978. The prairies of Indiana. In: Glenn-Lewin, David C.; Landers, Roger Q., Jr., eds. Proceedings, 5th Midwest prairie conference; 1976 August 22-24; Ames, IA. Ames, IA: Iowa State University: 25-31. [3292]
- 16. Brockway, Dale G.; Outcalt, Kenneth W. 2000. Restoring longleaf pine wiregrass ecosystems: hexazinone application enhances effects of prescribed fire. Forest Ecology and Management. 137: 121-138. [36613]
- 17. Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech Rep. RMRS-GRT-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 257 p. [36581]
- 19. Bunting, Stephen C.; Wright, Henry A.; Neuenschwander, Leon F. 1980. Long-term effects of fire on cactus in the southern mixed prairie of Texas. Journal of Range Management. 33(2): 85-88. [4271]
- 21. Callahan, J. L.; Barnett, C.; Cates, J. W. H. 1990. Palmetto prairie creation on phosphate-mined lands in central Florida. Restoration & Management Notes. 8(2): 94-95. [13833]
- 22. Callahan, Janine L.; Cates, James W. H. 1991. Rangeland reclamation in central Florida. Rangelands. 13(3): 140-143. [15372]
- 24. Conover, Denis G.; Geiger, Donald R. 1989. Establishment of a prairie on a borrow-pit at the Bergamo-Mt. St. John Nature Preserve in Greene County, Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science. 89(3): 42-44. [9744]
- 25. Cook, C. W. 1942. Insects and weather as they influence growth of cactus on the central Great Plains. Ecology. 23(2): 209-214. [673]
- 26. Corbett, Erica A.; Anderson, Roger C. 2001. Patterns of prairie plant species in Illinois landscape. In: Bernstein, Neil P.; Ostrander, Laura J., eds. Seeds for the future; roots of the past: Proceedings of the 17th North American prairie conference; 2000 July 16-20; Mason City, IA. Mason City, IA: North Iowa Community College: 177-181. [46511]
- 27. Cox, Mike K.; Franklin, William L. 1989. Terrestrial vertebrates of Scotts Bluff National Monument, Nebraska. The Great Basin Naturalist. 49(4): 597-613. [11004]
- 28. Dhillion, Shivcharn S.; Anderson, Roger C. 1994. Production on burned and unburned sand prairies during drought and non-drought years. Vegetatio. 115: 51-59. [26518]
- 29. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
- 31. Duever, Linda Conway. 1983. Natural communities of Florida's inland sand ridges. Palmetto. 3(3): 1-3, 10. [18775]
- 35. Fralish, James S.; Franklin, Scott B.; Close, David D. 1999. Open woodland communities of southern Illinois, western Kentucky, and middle Tennessee. In: Anderson, Roger; Fralish, James S.; Baskin, Jerry M., eds. Savannas, barrens, and rock outcrop plant communities of North America. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press: 171-189. [51448]
- 38. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
- 39. Greenberg, Cathryn H.; Neary, Daniel G.; Harris, Lawrence D.; Linda, Steven P. 1995. Vegetation recovery following high-intensity wildfire and silvicultural treatments in sand pine scrub. The American Midland Naturalist. 133(1): 149-163. [25458]
- 40. Greenberg, Cathryn H.; Simons, Robert W. 1999. Age, composition, and stand structure of old-growth oak sites in the Florida high pine landscape: implications for ecosystem management and restoration. Natural Areas Journal. 19(1): 30-40. [29659]
- 44. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2d ed. Chicago: The Swallow Press, Inc. 666 p. [6851]
- 50. Kaul, Robert P.; Keeler, Kathleen H. 1980. Effects of grazing and juniper canopy closure on the prairie flora in Nebraska high-plains canyons. In: Kucera, Clair L., ed. Proceedings, 7th North American prairie conference; 1980 August 4-6; Springfield, MO. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri: 95-105. [2923]
- 53. Loik, Michael E.; Nobel, Park S. 1993. Freezing tolerance and water relations of Opuntia fragilis from Canada and the United States. Ecology. 74(6): 1722-1732. [22587]
- 55. McGinty, Douglas T.; Christy, E. Jennifer. 1977. Turkey oak ecology on a Georgia sandhill. The American Midland Naturalist. 98(2): 487-491. [6431]
- 61. Olson, Jerry S. 1958. Rates of succession and soil changes on southern Lake Michigan sand dunes. Botanical Gazette. 119(3): 125-170. [10557]
- 64. Ramaley, Francis. 1939. Sand-hill vegetation of northeastern Colorado. Ecological Monographs. 9(1): 1-51. [5546]
- 66. Richardson, Donald Robert. 1977. Vegetation of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge of Palm Beach County, Florida. Florida Scientist. 40(4): 281-330. [9644]
- 69. Schulten, Julia A. 1985. The effects of burning on the soil lichen community of a sand prairie. Bryologist. 88(2): 110-114. [26135]
- 71. Sims, Phillip L.; Berg, William A.; Bradford, James A. 1995. Vegetation of sandhills under grazed and ungrazed conditions. In: Hartnett, David C., ed. Prairie biodiversity: Proceedings, 14th North American prairie conference; 1994 July 12-16; Manhattan, KS. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University: 129-135. [28245]
- 75. Thornber, J.J. 1911. Native cacti as emergency forage plants. In: Bulletin No. 67. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station: 457-508. [5089]
- 76. Tiffney, W., Jr.; Eveleigh, D.; Barrera, J.; Mitchell, S. 1979. Evaluation of some nitrogen-fixing plants for coastal zone management applications. In: Gordon, J. C.; Wheeler, C. T.; Perry, D. A., eds. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in the management of temperate forests: Proceedings of a workshop; 1979 April 2-5; Corvallis, OR. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University, Forest Research Laboratory: 420-428. [4309]
- 78. Tolstead, W. L. 1941. Plant communities and secondary succession in south-central South Dakota. Ecology. 22(3): 322-328. [5887]
- 83. Weaver, J. E.; Albertson, F. W. 1944. Nature and degree of recovery of grassland from the great drought of 1933 to 1940. Ecological Monographs. 14(4): 392-479. [26138]
- 84. Witz, Brian W.; Wilson, Dawn S.; Palmer, Michael D. 1991. Distribution of Gopherus polyphemus and its vertebrate symbionts in three burrow categories. The American Midland Naturalist. 126(1): 152-158. [15684]
- 87. Wunderlin, Richard P. 1998. Guide to the vascular plants of Florida. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida. 806 p. [28655]
- 65. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
- 34. Flora of North America Association. 2006. Flora of North America: The flora, [Online]. Flora of North America Association (Producer). Available: http://www.fna.org/FNA. [36990]
- 58. Mohlenbrock, Robert H. 1986. [Revised edition]. Guide to the vascular flora of Illinois. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 507 p. [17383]
Trusted
Habitat: Rangeland Cover Types
This species is known to occur in association with the following Rangeland Cover Types (as classified by the Society for Range Management, SRM):
More info for the terms: cover, hardwood, shrub
SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES [70]:
211 Creosote bush scrub
212 Blackbush
310 Needle-and-thread-blue grama
412 Juniper-pinyon woodland
501 Saltbush-greasewood
502 Grama-galleta
505 Grama-tobosa shrub
508 Creosotebush-tarbush
601 Bluestem prairie
602 Bluestem-prairie sandreed
603 Prairie sandreed-needlegrass
604 Bluestem-grama prairie
605 Sandsage prairie
606 Wheatgrass-bluestem-needlegrass
607 Wheatgrass-needlegrass
608 Wheatgrass-grama-needlegrass
609 Wheatgrass-grama
611 Blue grama-buffalo grass
612 Sagebrush-grass
704 Blue grama-western wheatgrass
705 Blue grama-galleta
706 Blue grama-sideoats grama
707 Blue grama-sideoats grama-black grama
709 Bluestem-grama
710 Bluestem prairie
711 Bluestem-sacahuista prairie
714 Grama-bluestem
715 Grama-buffalo grass
717 Little bluestem-Indiangrass-Texas wintergrass
718 Mesquite-grama
719 Mesquite-liveoak-seacoast bluestem
720 Sand bluestem-little bluestem (dunes)
721 Sand bluestem-little bluestem (plains)
722 Sand sagebrush-mixed prairie
727 Mesquite-buffalo grass
728 Mesquite-granjeno-acacia
729 Mesquite
730 Sand shinnery oak
731 Cross timbers-Oklahoma
732 Cross timbers-Texas (little bluestem-post oak)
733 Juniper-oak
734 Mesquite-oak
808 Sand pine scrub
809 Mixed hardwood and pine
810 Longleaf pine-turkey oak hills
811 South Florida flatwoods
812 North Florida flatwoods
814 Cabbage palm flatwoods
816 Cabbage palm hammocks
- 70. Shiflet, Thomas N., ed. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United States. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management. 152 p. [23362]
Trusted
Habitat: Cover Types
This species is known to occur in association with the following cover types (as classified by the Society of American Foresters):
More info for the term: cover
SAF COVER TYPES [33]:
1 Jack pine
24 Hemlock-yellow birch
25 Sugar maple-beech-yellow birch
26 Sugar maple-basswood
27 Sugar maple
40 Post oak-blackjack oak
42 Bur Oak
45 Pitch pine
46 Eastern redcedar
52 White oak-black oak-northern red oak
60 Beech-sugar maple
66 Ashe juniper-redberry (Pinchot) juniper
67 Mohrs (shin) oak
68 Mesquite
69 Sand pine
70 Longleaf pine
71 Longleaf pine-scrub oak
72 Southern scrub oak
73 Southern redcedar
74 Cabbage palmetto
75 Shortleaf pine
76 Shortleaf pine-oak
78 Virginia pine-oak
79 Virginia pine
80 Loblolly pine-shortleaf pine
81 Loblolly pine
82 Loblolly pine-hardwood
83 Longleaf pine-slash pine
84 Slash pine
85 Slash pine-hardwood
98 Pond pine
110 Black oak
111 South Florida slash pine
220 Rocky Mountain juniper
239 Pinyon-juniper
240 Arizona cypress
241 Western live oak
242 Mesquite
- 33. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
Trusted
Habitat: Plant Associations
This species is known to occur in association with the following plant community types (as classified by Küchler 1964):
More info for the term: shrub
KUCHLER [52] PLANT ASSOCIATIONS:
K023 Juniper-pinyon woodland
K027 Mesquite bosques
K038 Great Basin sagebrush
K039 Blackbrush
K040 Saltbush-greasewood
K044 Creosote bush-tarbush
K045 Ceniza shrub
K053 Grama-galleta steppe
K054 Grama-tobosa prairie
K056 Wheatgrass-needlegrass shrubsteppe
K058 Grama-tobosa shrubsteppe
K059 Trans-Pecos shrub savanna
K060 Mesquite savanna
K062 Mesquite-live oak savanna
K065 Grama-buffalo grass
K066 Wheatgrass-needlegrass
K067 Wheatgrass-bluestem-needlegrass
K068 Wheatgrass-grama-buffalo grass
K069 Bluestem-grama prairie
K070 Sandsage-bluestem prairie
K071 Shinnery
K072 Sea oats prairie
K074 Bluestem prairie
K075 Nebraska Sandhills prairie
K076 Blackland prairie
K077 Bluestem-sacahuista prairie
K079 Palmetto prairie
K081 Oak savanna
K082 Mosaic of K074 and K100
K084 Cross Timbers
K085 Mesquite-buffalo grass
K087 Mesquite-oak savanna
K088 Fayette prairie
K089 Black Belt
K090 Live oak-sea oats
K091 Cypress savanna
K099 Maple-basswood forest
K100 Oak-hickory forest
K102 Beech-maple forest
K104 Appalachian oak forest
K110 Northeastern oak-pine forest
K111 Oak-hickory-pine
K112 Southern mixed forest
K114 Pocosin
K115 Sand pine scrub
- 52. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. United States [Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States]. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 1:3,168,000; colored. [3455]
Trusted
Habitat: Ecosystem
This species is known to occur in the following ecosystem types (as named by the U.S. Forest Service in their Forest and Range Ecosystem [FRES] Type classification):
ECOSYSTEMS [36]:
FRES12 Longleaf-slash pine
FRES13 Loblolly-shortleaf pine
FRES15 Oak-hickory
FRES16 Oak-gum-cypress
FRES18 Maple-beech-birch
FRES29 Sagebrush
FRES30 Desert shrub
FRES31 Shinnery
FRES32 Texas savanna
FRES33 Southwestern shrubsteppe
FRES35 Pinyon-juniper
FRES38 Plains grasslands
FRES39 Prairie
FRES40 Desert grasslands
- 36. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; Lewis, Mont E.; Smith, Dixie R. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
Trusted
Range and Habitat in Illinois
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Comments: Sandy soil and rock outrcrops (ranging from granitic to sand stone or limestone) of hills, valleys, and shores.
Trusted
Associations
Faunal Associations
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Flower-Visiting Insects of Eastern Prickly Pear in Illinois
(Long-tongued bees suck nectar or collect pollen, while short-tongued bees usually collect pollen; beetle activity is unspecified; observations are from Mitchell, Moure & Hurd, LaBerge, and MacRae as indicated below)
Bees (long-tongued)
Apidae (Bombini): Bombus pensylvanica (Mch); Anthophoridae (Xylocopini): Xylocopa virginica (Mch); Anthophoridae (Eucerini): Melissodes communis communis (Mch), Melissodes coreopsis sn (Mch), Melissodes tepaneca (Mch), Melissodes wheeleri (Mch); Megachilidae (Megachilini): Lithurge littoralis (Mch), Megachile addenda (Mch), Megachile mendica (Mch), Megachile montivaga (Mch), Megachile texana (Mch)
Bees (short-tongued)
Halictidae (Halictinae): Agapostemon splendens (Mch), Augochlorella striata (Mch), Halictus ligatus (Mch), Halictus rubicunda (MH), Lasioglossum coreopsis (Mch), Lasioglossum nymphalis (Mch), Lasioglossum pilosus pilosus (Mch); Colletidae (Colletinae): Colletes brevicornis sn/exp (LB)
Beetles
Buprestidae: Acmaeodera tubulus (McR)
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Insect Visitors of Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. illinoiswildflowers.info, version (05/2013)
See: Abbreviations for Insect Activities, Abbreviations for Scientific Observers, References for behavioral observations
Trusted
Population Biology
Number of Occurrences
Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.
Estimated Number of Occurrences: 81 to >300
Comments: Over 100 EOs (Benson 1982).
Trusted
General Ecology
Fire Management Considerations
Repeated fires can greatly reduce populations of small Opuntia spp. like
eastern pricklypear. High fire frequency may eliminate eastern pricklypears from a
site for many years until new plants reestablish from seeds or pads carried onto
the site by birds or mammals [10].
- 10. Benson, Lyman; Walkington, David L. 1965. The southern Californian prickly pears--invasion, adulteration, and trial-by-fire. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 52: 262-273. [5267]
Trusted
Plant Response to Fire
Eastern pricklypear establishes from singed or unburned pads after fire [10].
It probably also establishes from on- and off-site seed sources and pads
transported onto burns from off-site sources [12]; however, information on postfire
seedling establishment of eastern pricklypear and postfire pad transport is
lacking (as of 2005).
A spring fire in a sand lovegrass-little bluestem-prairie sandreed community in
Illinois destroyed most of the existing pads of eastern pricklypear. Sampling
showed good regrowth of the cactus 3 months after fire. However, mortality of the
new plants was high in the next 2 years following the burn. Prickly-pear
biomass was 34 g/m² 3 months after fire, 26 g/m² 1 year
after fire, and 10 g/m² 2 years after fire [2]. In
studies of other Opuntia spp., it was found that many plants that
sprout following fire are attacked by insects that spread bacterial and fungal
infections which subsequently kill the new stems [19].
- 10. Benson, Lyman; Walkington, David L. 1965. The southern Californian prickly pears--invasion, adulteration, and trial-by-fire. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 52: 262-273. [5267]
- 12. Berry, Joni. 1977. Effects of grazing pressure on Opuntia populations. Proceedings, South Dakota Academy of Science. 56: 271-272. [5169]
- 2. Anderson, Roger C.; Leahy, Theresa; Dhillion, Shivcharn S. 1989. Numbers and biomass of selected insect groups on burned and unburned sand prairie. The American Midland Naturalist. 122: 151-162. [7912]
- 19. Bunting, Stephen C.; Wright, Henry A.; Neuenschwander, Leon F. 1980. Long-term effects of fire on cactus in the southern mixed prairie of Texas. Journal of Range Management. 33(2): 85-88. [4271]
Trusted
Immediate Effect of Fire
Moderate- or low-severity fires can kill the aboveground parts of Opuntia
spp. Some pads may survive low- to moderate-severity fires when they are covered
by litter or sheltered within a clump of stems. High-severity fire usually kills
the entire plant [10].
- 10. Benson, Lyman; Walkington, David L. 1965. The southern Californian prickly pears--invasion, adulteration, and trial-by-fire. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 52: 262-273. [5267]
Trusted
Post-fire Regeneration
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY [73]:
Surface rhizome/chamaephytic root crown in organic mantle or on soil surface
Caudex/herbaceous root crown, growing points in soil
Ground residual colonizer (on-site, initial community)
Initial off-site colonizer (off-site, initial community)
Secondary colonizer (on-site or off-site seed sources)
- 73. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. FEIS postfire regeneration workshop--April 12: Seral origin of species comprising secondary plant succession in Northern Rocky Mountain forests. 10 p. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [20090]
Trusted
Fire Ecology
Fire adaptations:
Fire information specific to this species is lacking. Opuntia spp. are adapted to
survive low-severity fire by sprouting from the caudex and by layering from
pads that were buried or protected in the litter layer [19,74]. Prickly-pear
cacti colonize burned areas when
off-site seed is transported on-site by animals [77].
FIRE REGIMES:
Eastern pricklypear grows in plant communities with a wide range of fire
frequencies from less than 10 years for many grassland and prairie communities
to greater than 1,000 years for some of the eastern mixed-hardwood communities.
As of this writing (2005), fires ecology studies are lacking for eastern
eastern pricklypear. The following table provides fire return intervals for plant
communities and ecosystems where eastern pricklypear occurs. For further
information, see the FEIS review of the dominant species listed below.
| Community or Ecosystem | Dominant Species | Fire Return Interval Range (years) |
| maple-beech-birch | Acer-Fagus-Betula spp. | >1,000 |
| sugar maple | Acer saccharum | >1,000 |
| sugar maple-basswood | Acer saccharum-Tilia americana | >1,000 [82] |
| bluestem prairie | Andropogon gerardii var. gerardii-Schizachyrium scoparium | <10 [51,62] |
| Nebraska sandhills prairie | Andropogon gerardii var. paucipilus-Schizachyrium scoparium | <10 |
| bluestem-Sacahuista prairie | Andropogon littoralis-Spartina spartinae | <10 [62] |
| basin big sagebrush | Artemisia tridentata var. tridentata | 12-43 [68] |
| mountain big sagebrush | Artemisia tridentata var. vaseyana | 15-40 [5,20,57] |
| Wyoming big sagebrush | Artemisia tridentata var. wyomingensis | 10-70 (µ=40) [81,88] |
| saltbush-greasewood | Atriplex confertifolia-Sarcobatus vermiculatus | <35 to <100 [62] |
| plains grasslands | Bouteloua spp. | <35 [62,86] |
| blue grama-needle-and-thread grass-western wheatgrass | Bouteloua gracilis-Hesperostipa comata-Pascopyrum smithii | <35 [62,67,86] |
| blue grama-buffalo grass | Bouteloua gracilis-Buchloe dactyloides | <35 [62,86] |
| grama-galleta steppe | Bouteloua gracilis-Pleuraphis jamesii | <35 to <100 |
| blue grama-tobosa prairie | Bouteloua gracilis-Pleuraphis mutica | <35 to <100 |
| blackbrush | Coleogyne ramosissima | <35 to <100 |
| Arizona cypress | Cupressus arizonica | <35 to 200 [62] |
| beech-sugar maple | Fagus spp.-Acer saccharum | >1,000 [82] |
| juniper-oak savanna | Juniperus ashei-Quercus virginiana | <35 |
| Rocky Mountain juniper | Juniperus scopulorum | <35 [62] |
| cedar glades | Juniperus virginiana | 3-22 [42,62] |
| creosotebush | Larrea tridentata | <35 to <100 |
| Ceniza shrub | Larrea tridentata-Leucophyllum frutescens-Prosopis glandulosa | <35 [62] |
| wheatgrass plains grasslands | Pascopyrum smithii | <5-47+ [62,63,86] |
| pinyon-juniper | Pinus-Juniperus spp. | <35 [62] |
| jack pine | Pinus banksiana | <35 to 200 [30] |
| shortleaf pine | Pinus echinata | 2-15 |
| shortleaf pine-oak | Pinus echinata-Quercus spp. | <10 |
| slash pine | Pinus elliottii | 3-8 |
| slash pine-hardwood | Pinus elliottii-variable | <35 |
| sand pine | Pinus elliottii var. elliottii | 25-45 [82] |
| South Florida slash pine | Pinus elliottii var. densa | 1-15 [59,72,82] |
| Jeffrey pine | Pinus jeffreyi | 5-30 |
| western white pine* | Pinus monticola | 50-200 [4] |
| longleaf-slash pine | Pinus palustris-P. elliottii | 1-4 [59,82] |
| longleaf pine-scrub oak | Pinus palustris-Quercus spp. | 6-10 [82] |
| pitch pine | Pinus rigida | 6-25 [18,45] |
| pocosin | Pinus serotina | 3-8 |
| loblolly pine | Pinus taeda | 3-8 |
| loblolly-shortleaf pine | Pinus taeda-P. echinata | 10 to <35 |
| Virginia pine | Pinus virginiana | 10 to <35 |
| Virginia pine-oak | Pinus virginiana-Quercus spp. | 10 to <35 [82] |
| galleta-threeawn shrubsteppe | Pleuraphis jamesii-Aristida purpurea | <35 to <100 [62] |
| mesquite | Prosopis glandulosa | <35 to <100 [56,62] |
| mesquite-buffalo grass | Prosopis glandulosa-Buchloe dactyloides | <35 |
| Texas savanna | Prosopis glandulosa var. glandulosa | <10 [62] |
| oak-hickory | Quercus-Carya spp. | <35 [82] |
| oak-juniper woodland (Southwest) | Quercus-Juniperus spp. | <35 to <200 [62] |
| northeastern oak-pine | Quercus-Pinus spp. | 10 to <35 |
| southeastern oak-pine | Quercus-Pinus spp. | <10 [82] |
| coast live oak | Quercus agrifolia | 2-75 [41] |
| white oak-black oak-northern red oak | Quercus alba-Q. velutina-Q. rubra | <35 |
| bur oak | Quercus macrocarpa | <10 [82] |
| oak savanna | Quercus macrocarpa/Andropogon gerardii-Schizachyrium scoparium | 2-14 [62,82] |
| shinnery | Quercus mohriana | <35 [62] |
| post oak-blackjack oak | Quercus stellata-Q. marilandica | <10 |
| black oak | Quercus velutina | <35 |
| live oak | Quercus virginiana | 10 to<100 [82] |
| interior live oak | Quercus wislizenii | <35 [4] |
| cabbage palmetto-slash pine | Sabal palmetto-Pinus elliottii | <10 [59,82] |
| blackland prairie | Schizachyrium scoparium-Nassella leucotricha | <10 |
| Fayette prairie | Schizachyrium scoparium-Buchloe dactyloides | <10 [82] |
| little bluestem-grama prairie | Schizachyrium scoparium-Bouteloua spp. | <35 [62] |
*fire return interval varies widely; trends in variation are noted in the species review
- 4. Arno, Stephen F. 2000. Fire in western forest ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 97-120. [36984]
- 5. Arno, Stephen F.; Gruell, George E. 1983. Fire history at the forest-grassland ecotone in southwestern Montana. Journal of Range Management. 36(3): 332-336. [342]
- 18. Buchholz, Kenneth; Good, Ralph E. 1982. Density, age structure, biomass and net annual aboveground productivity of dwarfed Pinus rigida Moll. from the New Jersey Pine Barren Plains. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 109(1): 24-34. [8639]
- 19. Bunting, Stephen C.; Wright, Henry A.; Neuenschwander, Leon F. 1980. Long-term effects of fire on cactus in the southern mixed prairie of Texas. Journal of Range Management. 33(2): 85-88. [4271]
- 20. Burkhardt, Wayne J.; Tisdale, E. W. 1976. Causes of juniper invasion in southwestern Idaho. Ecology. 57: 472-484. [565]
- 30. Duchesne, Luc C.; Hawkes, Brad C. 2000. Fire in northern ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 35-51. [36982]
- 42. Guyette, Richard; McGinnes, E. A., Jr. 1982. Fire history of an Ozark glade in Missouri. Transactions, Missouri Academy of Science. 16: 85-93. [5170]
- 56. McPherson, Guy R. 1995. The role of fire in the desert grasslands. In: McClaran, Mitchel P.; Van Devender, Thomas R., eds. The desert grassland. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press: 130-151. [26576]
- 57. Miller, Richard F.; Rose, Jeffery A. 1995. Historic expansion of Juniperus occidentalis (western juniper) in southeastern Oregon. The Great Basin Naturalist. 55(1): 37-45. [25666]
- 59. Myers, Ronald L. 2000. Fire in tropical and subtropical ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 161-173. [36985]
- 63. Quinnild, Clayton L.; Cosby, Hugh E. 1958. Relicts of climax vegetation on two mesas in western North Dakota. Ecology. 39(1): 29-32. [1925]
- 67. Rowe, J. S. 1969. Lightning fires in Saskatchewan grassland. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 83: 317-324. [6266]
- 68. Sapsis, David B. 1990. Ecological effects of spring and fall prescribed burning on basin big sagebrush/Idaho fescue--bluebunch wheatgrass communities. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 105 p. Thesis. [16579]
- 72. Snyder, James R.; Herndon, Alan; Robertson, William B., Jr. 1990. South Florida rockland. In: Myers, Ronald L.; Ewel, John J., eds. Ecosystems of Florida. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida Press: 230-274. [17391]
- 74. Thomas, P. A. 1991. Response of succulents to fire: a review. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1(1): 11-22. [14991]
- 77. Timmons, F. L. 1942. The dissemination of prickly pear seed by jack rabbits. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy. 34: 513-520. [5214]
- 81. Vincent, Dwain W. 1992. The sagebrush/grasslands of the upper Rio Puerco area, New Mexico. Rangelands. 14(5): 268-271. [19698]
- 86. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1982. Fire ecology: United States and southern Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 501 p. [2620]
- 88. Young, James A.; Evans, Raymond A. 1981. Demography and fire history of a western juniper stand. Journal of Range Management. 34(6): 501-505. [2659]
- 41. Greenlee, Jason M.; Langenheim, Jean H. 1990. Historic FIRE REGIMES and their relation to vegetation patterns in the Monterey Bay area of California. The American Midland Naturalist. 124(2): 239-253. [15144]
- 51. Kucera, Clair L. 1981. Grasslands and fire. In: Mooney, H. A.; Bonnicksen, T. M.; Christensen, N. L.; Lotan, J. E.; Reiners, W. A., technical coordinators. FIRE REGIMES and ecosystem properties: Proceedings of the conference; 1978 December 11-15; Honolulu, HI. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-26. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 90-111. [4389]
- 45. Hendrickson, William H. 1972. Perspective on fire and ecosystems in the United States. In: Fire in the environment: Symposium proceedings; 1972 May 1-5; Denver, CO. FS-276. [Washington, DC]: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 29-33. In cooperation with: Fire Services of Canada, Mexico, and the United States; Members of the Fire Management Study Group; North American Forestry Commission; FAO. [17276]
- 62. Paysen, Timothy E.; Ansley, R. James; Brown, James K.; [and others]. 2000. Fire in western shrubland, woodland, and grassland ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-volume 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 121-159. [36978]
- 82. Wade, Dale D.; Brock, Brent L.; Brose, Patrick H.; [and others]. 2000. Fire in eastern ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 53-96. [36983]
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Molecular Biology
Barcode data: Opuntia humifusa
No available public DNA sequences.
Download FASTA File
Trusted
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Opuntia humifusa
Public Records: 3
Specimens with Barcodes: 7
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
National NatureServe Conservation Status
Canada
Rounded National Status Rank: N1 - Critically Imperiled
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure
Trusted
NatureServe Conservation Status
Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure
Reasons: Widespread throughout the United States.
Trusted
Threats
Management
Management considerations
Opuntia spp. may increase in abundance during droughty periods because of a
reduction in other plant species that are not as drought tolerant. Also,
dry conditions are not as favorable for some of the insects that
can be the most damaging to eastern pricklypear. As moisture levels increase in
years following drought, insect damage to eastern pricklypear can be high, and
native grasses and forbs begin to reestablish on the site near clumps of
eastern pricklypear where the clumps create a favorable microsite for seed germination
[83].
There is some indication that Opuntia spp. may increase in response to
heavy grazing. However, researchers are not sure if eastern pricklypear
populations respond to a reduction of the preferred forage species, or if the
grazing animals simply provide for improved spread and establishment of the
cactus by transporting the pads on their bodies [12].
Opuntia spp. can be problematic in pastures grazed by domestic sheep and goats.
The spines can cause bacterial infection in the mouth and
intestinal tract, and the seeds can cause rumen impaction [80].
Eastern pricklypear is susceptible to damage by the cactus bug, a cochineal
scale, and several species of cactus borers [25].
Opuntia humifusa:
- 12. Berry, Joni. 1977. Effects of grazing pressure on Opuntia populations. Proceedings, South Dakota Academy of Science. 56: 271-272. [5169]
- 25. Cook, C. W. 1942. Insects and weather as they influence growth of cactus on the central Great Plains. Ecology. 23(2): 209-214. [673]
- 83. Weaver, J. E.; Albertson, F. W. 1944. Nature and degree of recovery of grassland from the great drought of 1933 to 1940. Ecological Monographs. 14(4): 392-479. [26138]
- 80. Ueckert, D. N.; Petersen, J. L.; Lawrence, B. K.; Dusek, R. K. 1992. Integration of the fire-picloram system and sheep grazing management to prevent pearmouth. Progress Report PR-4929. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Station. 21-23. [55075]
Trusted
-
Aeschimann, D. & C. Heitz. 2005. Synonymie-Index der Schweizer Flora und der angrenzenden Gebiete (SISF). 2te Auflage. Documenta Floristicae Helvetiae N° 2. Genève.
http://www.crsf.ch/
Trusted
Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems
Benefits
Other uses and values
Humans eat the stems, fruits, and seeds of eastern pricklypear. The stems
are usually singed to remove the spines and are then roasted and peeled or deep-fried.
Pads can be dried for later use. Fruits are eaten
fresh or dried and can be used for jelly or syrup. Seeds can be roasted and
ground into flour [32]. Native Americans used the mucilaginous
stem sap as a wound dressing [37].
- 32. Elias, Thomas S.; Dykeman, Peter A. 1982. Field guide to North American edible wild plants. New York: Outdoor Life Books. 286 p. [21104]
- 37. Gilmore, Melvin Randolph. 1919. Uses of plants by the Indians of the Missouri River region. In: 33rd annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology: 44-154. [6928]
Trusted
Value for rehabilitation of disturbed sites
Eastern prickly pear has been used in restoration projects, although the
literature does not indicate extensive use for this purpose.
Seedlings were successfully established in a reclamation project
on a sand and gravel borrow-pit in Ohio [24].
Opuntia seeds germinate most readily when they are fresh. Dried seeds require
scarification to induce germination [3]. Eastern
eastern pricklypear is easily established from stem cuttings buried to
approximately three-fifths of their length [75], and can be
artificially propagated using tissue culture [85].
- 24. Conover, Denis G.; Geiger, Donald R. 1989. Establishment of a prairie on a borrow-pit at the Bergamo-Mt. St. John Nature Preserve in Greene County, Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science. 89(3): 42-44. [9744]
- 75. Thornber, J.J. 1911. Native cacti as emergency forage plants. In: Bulletin No. 67. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station: 457-508. [5089]
- 3. Anthony, Margery. 1954. Ecology of the Opuntiae in the Big Bend region of Texas. Ecology. 35(3): 334-347. [5060]
- 85. Woolf, Norma Bennett. 1990. Biotechnologies sow seeds for the future. BioScience. 40(5): 346-348. [11076]
Trusted
Importance to Livestock and Wildlife
Roots, stems, fruits, and seeds of eastern prickly pear may be eaten by a
variety of birds and animals [23,54]. Eastern prickly pear is one of the most
important foods of the prairie pocket mouse [15]. Gopher tortoises will feed on
the stems, fruits and seeds, but
eastern pricklypear does not constitute a large percentage of their diet [14].
White-tailed deer in North Carolina feed on eastern
eastern pricklypear fruits in the fall and winter [43]. The ornate box turtle,
endangered in Wisconsin, feeds on the stems and fruits [23].
The pads of Opuntia spp. can be used as emergency livestock forage after
the spines have been singed off [47].
Palatability/nutritional value:
Eastern pricklypear is low in nutritional value for livestock [47].
The nutritional value of fresh, immature eastern pricklypear stems in the
United States is as follows [60]:
Percent composition | Percent digestible protein | ||
| ash | 2.6 | cattle | 0.5 |
| crude fiber | 1.2 | horses | 0.4 |
| protein | 0.9 | domestic sheep | 0.5 |
| domestic rabbits | 0.5 | ||
Cover value: Snakes and lizards
hide under the pads to avoid the sun. Birds, including northern bobwhites, nest
in eastern pricklypear cacti, using the protection offered by the
spines [23,46].
- 14. Birkhead, Roger D.; Guyer, Craig; Hermann, Sharon M. 2005. Patterns of foliovory and seed ingestion by gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) in a southeastern pine savanna. The American Midland Naturalist. 154(1): 143-151. [54515]
- 15. Blair, W. Frank. 1937. The burrows and food of the prairie pocket mouse. Journal of Mammalogy. 18(2): 188-191. [55076]
- 23. Cohn, Jeffrey P.; Kline, Virginia. 1982. Of prairies and prickly pears. Nature Conservancy News. 32(6): 17-22. [2814]
- 43. Harlow, Richard F.; Urbston, David F.; Williams, James G., Jr. 1979. Forages eaten by deer in two habitats at the Savannah River Plant. Res. Note SE-275. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 4 p. [41846]
- 46. Hernandez, Fidel; Henke, Scott E.; Silvy, Nova J.; Rollins, Dale. 2003. The use of prickly pear cactus as nesting cover by northern bobwhites. Journal of Wildlife Management. 67(2): 417-423. [47322]
- 47. Humphrey, Robert R. 1960. Forage production on Arizona ranges. V. Pima, Pinal and Santa Cruz Counties. Bulletin 502. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station. 137 p. [4520]
- 54. Loucks, Orie L.; Plumb-Mentjes, Mary L.; Rogers, Deborah. 1985. Gap processes and large-scale disturbances in sand prairies. In: Pickett, S. T. A.; White, P. S., eds. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. New York: Academic Press: 71-83. [27848]
- 60. National Academy of Sciences. 1971. Atlas of nutritional data on United States and Canadian feeds. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. 772 p. [1731]
Trusted
Cultivation
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Wikipedia
Opuntia humifusa
Opuntia humifusa, commonly known as the Eastern Prickly Pear or Indian Fig, is a native cactus found in most of eastern North America. It ranges from Montana eastward to southern Ontario and then on to Massachusetts, south to Florida and westward to New Mexico.[1]
The green stems of this low-growing perennial cactus are flattened and are formed of segments. Barbed bristles are found around the surfaces of the segments and longer spines are sometimes present.[2] The flowers are yellow to gold in color and are found along the margins of mature segments. The flowers are waxy and sometimes have red centers. They measure 4-6 cm wide and bloom in the late spring.
The juicy and edible red fruits measure from 3-5 cm. As the fruit matures, it changes colour from green to red, and often remains on the cactus until the following spring. There are 6 to 33 small, flat, light-colored seeds in each fruit.
This plant is very intolerant of shade. It thrives in full sun and well-drained soil.
Some botanists treat this cactus as a variety Opuntia compressa var. humifusa, or a synonym of Opuntia compressa. Those recognizing this species treat Opuntia rafinesquii as a junior synonym.
Gallery[edit]
Close-up of yellow barbed bristles and longer spines
Opuntia humifusa - Michigan (wild)[3]
References[edit]
- ^ "Plants Profile: Opuntia humifusa". Natural Resources Conservation Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved 13 April 2010.
- ^ "4. Opuntia humifusa", Flora of North America
- ^ Hector, Michael. "Michigan prickly pear".
Unreviewed
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!



