Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (1) (learn more)

Overview

Distribution

National Distribution

Canada

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: It occurs in the U.S. in California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, Wyoming, Oklahoma; in Canada in Alberta and Saskatchewan; and likely in Mexico.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Range Description

This is a wide-ranging species. It can be found in Chihuahua, Mexico and in the southwestern United States, from Texas and New Mexico extending north to Washington and Wyoming (Hernández et al. 2004) and Canada. It grows at elevations of 300 to 2,400 m asl (Benson 1982).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Plains pricklypear grows in the northern and southern Great Plains, the shrub- and woodlands of the Great Basin, the eastern Sierra Nevada, the borders of the Rocky Mountain forest regions, and the northern Chihuahuan Desert. It occurs from British Columbia to Manitoba southward through the Dakotas and Missouri to Texas and every state westward [6,30,42]. A distributional map of plains pricklypear is available on the PLANTS database.  Distribution of infrataxa is as follows [70]:

Opuntia polyacantha var. arenaria - in sandy soils near the Rio Grande of southeastern New Mexico, extreme western Texas, and northern Chihuahua
Opuntia polyacantha var. erinacea - Arizona
Opuntia polyacantha var. hysricina - eastern Utah and western Colorado
Opuntia polyacantha var. nicholii - Arizona and New Mexico
Opuntia polyacantha. var. polyacantha - Alberta and Saskatchewan south to western Texas, New Mexico, and southeastern Utah

  • 6. Benson, Lyman. 1982. The cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1044 p. [1513]
  • 30. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 42. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
  • 70. Parfitt, Bruce Dale. 1991. Biosystematics of the Opuntia polyacantha complex (Cactaceae) of western North America. Tempe, AZ: University of Arizona. 115 p. [36592]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Regional Distribution in the Western United States

More info on this topic.

This species can be found in the following regions of the western United States (according to the Bureau of Land Management classification of Physiographic Regions of the western United States):

BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS [8]:



5 Columbia Plateau

6 Upper Basin and Range

7 Lower Basin and Range

8 Northern Rocky Mountains

9 Middle Rocky Mountains

10 Wyoming Basin

11 Southern Rocky Mountains

12 Colorado Plateau

13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont

14 Great Plains

15 Black Hills Uplift

16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands

  • 8. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Occurrence in North America


AZCACOIDKSMOMTNENV
NMNDOKORSDTXUTWAWY


ABBCSK


MEXICO




Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Morphology

Description

Plains pricklypear is a perennial, typically reaching 4 to 12 inches (10-30 cm) in height and rarely growing more than 16 inches (40 cm) tall [42]. The glabrous, flattened stems are 2 to 4 inches (5-12 cm) broad, 2 to 5 inches (5-13 cm) long, and about 0.4 inches (1 cm) thick. Spines of these stems are only slightly barbed. The species tends to form clumps or mats that extend several yards in diameter [6,42]. Mats up to 12 feet (3.7 m) in width and 30 feet (9.15 m) long were observed in the Great Plains [104].

The fruits are dry at maturity and are covered with barbed spines. Fruits develop on stem lobes. An examination of 550 randomly selected branches revealed fruit on 32% of the stem lobes, varying from none to 5 fruits per lobe. The most fruit is produced on stem branches that are 6 to 8 years old. The number of seeds varies from none to more than 70 per fruit [97]. Seeds are flat, and about 1.5 to 3.5 mm thick [70].

Plains pricklypear has a shallow, laterally extensive root system that takes advantage of rainfall as scant as 2.5 mm. Its high water retention capability in aboveground tissues allows it to survive drought. A clump 1 foot (0.3 m) in diameter may have a root system 4 to 6 feet (1.2-1.8 m) in diameter [17,22,71,97].

Opuntia plants usually live less than 20 years, but vegetative propagation can ensure a very long life span for the clonal colony [93].

  • 6. Benson, Lyman. 1982. The cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1044 p. [1513]
  • 17. Cook, C. W. 1942. Insects and weather as they influence growth of cactus on the Central Great Plains. Ecology. 23(2): 209-214. [673]
  • 22. Dougherty, R. L.; Lauenroth, W. K.; Singh, J. S. 1996. Response of a grassland cactus to frequency and size of rainfall events in a North American shortgrass steppe. Journal of Ecology. 84: 177-183. [26831]
  • 42. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
  • 70. Parfitt, Bruce Dale. 1991. Biosystematics of the Opuntia polyacantha complex (Cactaceae) of western North America. Tempe, AZ: University of Arizona. 115 p. [36592]
  • 93. Thomas, P. A. 1991. Response of succulents to fire: a review. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1(1): 11-22. [14991]
  • 97. Turner, George T.; Costello, David F. 1942. Ecological aspects of the pricklypear problem in eastern Colorado and Wyoming. Ecology. 23(4): 419-426. [2371]
  • 104. Weaver, J. E.; Albertson, F. W. 1956. Grasslands of the Great Plains. Lincoln, NE: Johnsen Publishing Company. 395 p. [2463]
  • 71. Parfitt, Bruce. 2001. [E-mail to Janet Howard]. January 15. Flint, MI: University of Michigan, Flint. On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. [36378]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Description

Shrubs, low, 10-25 cm, with ± prostrate branches. Stem segments not easily detached, green, elliptic to narrowly to broadly obovate to circular, 4-27 × 2-18 cm, low tuberculate; areoles 4-14 per diagonal row across midstem segment, subcircular, 3-6 mm; wool tan to brown. Spines at all or only distal areoles of stem segment, terete to flattened, stout to acicular to bristlelike, straight to curling, of 1 or 2 kinds; if 1 kind: 0-18 per areole, spreading and curling in various directions, sometimes straight, erect, ascending to deflexed, yellow to dark brown to black, turning gray, pink-gray to gray-brown, longest (35-)40-90(-185) mm; if ± 2 kinds: major spines (0-)1-5, reflexed to porrect, yellow-brown to brown to gray, longest 20-150 mm; minor spines (0-)5-11, deflexed, white to white-gray, longest 4-16 mm. Glochids inconspicuous, in narrow, tidy crescent at adaxial edge of areole or in broad, brushy crescent and tuft, yellow to reddish, aging brown, to 10 mm. Flowers: inner tepals yellow to magenta throughout, 25-40 mm; filaments white, yellow, or red to magenta (flowers may superficially appear bicolored); anthers yellow; style white to pale pink; stigma lobes green. Fruits tan to brown, ± cylindric, 15-45 × 12-25 mm, dry at maturity, glabrous, sometimes burlike; areoles 10-33, each or only distal areoles bearing 3-16 spines, 4-20 mm. Seeds tan to gray, flattened, warped, oblong to subcircular, 3-7 × 2-4 mm; girdle protruding 1-2 mm.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Diagnostic Description

Synonym

Cactus ferox Nuttall, Gen. N. Amer. Pl. 1: 296. 1818, not Willdenow 1813; Tunas polyacantha (Haworth) Nieuwland & Lunell
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Comments: Sandy soils of flats, washes, cayonsides, and hillsides in the desert, woodlands, plains.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
The species is found in grasslands, pine-juniper forests, sagebrush, xerophyllous scrub and lower montane forest. It grows on sandy soils of flats, washes, canyonsides, and hillsides in the desert, in woodlands, and on plains.

Systems
  • Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat characteristics

More info for the terms: frequency, relict

Plains pricklypear occurs on dry sites in 22 central and western states and provinces. It is common in the Great Plains, Great Basin, and Southwest [,6,45]. Plains pricklypear occurs both on grazed ranges and in areas not used by livestock [38,97]. It occurs in disturbed roadside areas [63] and in old, relict, pre-agricultural plant communities [3,25]. It is found on clay loam and sandy loam soils but is infrequent on sand dunes. In grasslands, pricklypear does not occur in areas characterized by abundant soil moisture, such as swales and depressions. Its frequency decreases in wet years. Precipitation is a primary determinant of the distribution and abundance of plains pricklypear [76,97].

Plains pricklypear was classified in a Utah salt-gradient study as having a low tolerance to salt [86], but a survey of saline areas (visible salt crystals on the soil surface) in southern Alberta and Saskatchewan revealed that plains pricklypear was present on more than 11% of the sites [11].

Throughout its range, plains pricklypear occurs from as low as 1,000 feet (300 m) in the Great Plains [83] to at least as high as 8,000 feet (1,600 m) in the southern Great Basin [6].

Elevations reported in the literature are as follows:

4,300 to 7,500 feet (1,310-2,285 m) in Colorado [25,40]
2,250 to 5,700 feet (685-1,735 m) in Montana [61,83]
4,920 to 6,560 feet (1,500-2,000 m) in Utah [31]
1,000 to 5,000 feet (300-1,525 m) in the northern Great Plains [83]
1,000 to 8,000 feet (300-2,440 m) in the southern Great Plains [6,83]

  • 3. Baker, William L.; Kennedy, Susan C. 1985. Presettlement vegetation of part of northwestern Moffat County, Colorado, described from remnants. The Great Basin Naturalist. 45(4): 747-783. [384]
  • 6. Benson, Lyman. 1982. The cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1044 p. [1513]
  • 11. Braidek, J. T.; Fedec, P.; Jones, D. 1984. Field survey of halophytic plants of disturbed sites on the Canadian prairies. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 64: 745-751. [24018]
  • 25. Erdman, James A. 1970. Pinyon-juniper succession after natural fires on residual soils of Mesa Verde, Colorado. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin: Biological Series. 11(2): 1-26. [11987]
  • 31. Greenwood, Larry R.; Brotherson, Jack D. 1978. Ecological relationships between pinyon-juniper and true mountain mahogany stands in the Uintah Basin, Utah. Journal of Range Management. 31(3): 164-167. [15654]
  • 38. Harvey, A. D. 1936. Rootsprouts as a means of vegetative reproduction in Opuntia polyacantha. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy. 28: 767-768. [1101]
  • 40. Hazlett, Donald L. 1998. Vascular plant species of the Pawnee National Grassland. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-17. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 26 p. [29136]
  • 61. Mackie, Richard J. 1970. Range ecology and relations of mule deer, elk, and cattle in the Missouri River Breaks, Montana. Wildlife Monographs No. 20. 79 p. [5897]
  • 63. Meier, Gretchen; Weaver, T. 1997. Desirables and weeds for roadside management--a northern Rocky Mountain catalogue. Report No. RHWA/MT-97/8115. Final report: July 1994-December 1997. Helena, MT: State of Montana Department of Transportation, Research, Development, and Technology Transfer Program. 145 p. [29135]
  • 76. Reed, Merton J.; Peterson, Roald A. 1961. Vegetation, soil, and cattle responses to grazing on Northern Great Plains range. Tech. Bull. 1252. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 79 p. [4286]
  • 83. Shiflet, Thomas N., ed. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United States. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management. 152 p. [23362]
  • 86. Skougard, Michael G.; Brotherson, Jack D. 1979. Vegetational response to three environmental gradients in the salt playa near Goshen, Utah County, Utah. The Great Basin Naturalist. 39(1): 44-58. [11198]
  • 97. Turner, George T.; Costello, David F. 1942. Ecological aspects of the pricklypear problem in eastern Colorado and Wyoming. Ecology. 23(4): 419-426. [2371]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Key Plant Community Associations

More info for the terms: forbs, shrubs, vine



In the Great Plains of southern Alberta and Saskatchewan, the western Dakotas, and eastern Montana, Wyoming and Colorado, common associated grasses include blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii), thickspike wheatgrass (Elymus lanceolatus), green needlegrass (Nassella viridula), needle-and-thread grass (Hesperostipa comata), buffalo grass (Buchloe dactyloides), prairie junegrass (Koeleria macrantha), Prairie sandreed (Calamovilfa longifolia), Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), and threadleaf sedge (Carex filifolia). Associated shrubs and forbs may include big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata), plains silver sagebrush (A. cana ssp. cana), fringed sagewort (A. frigida), rubber rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosus), black greasewood (Sarcobatus vermiculatus), broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae), shadscale (Atriplex confertifolia), Gardner's saltbush (A. gardneri), fourwing saltbush (A. canescens), winterfat (Krascheninnikovia lanata), and little clubmoss (Selaginella densa). Plains pricklypear occurs infrequently in the understory of open stands of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) [4,19,40,43,44,57,61,79,83].

In the cold desert grasslands and shrublands of the northern interior, including southern British Columbia, eastern Washington and Oregon, Idaho, and western Montana, plains pricklypear occurs with blue grama, western wheatgrass, thickspike wheatgrass, green needlegrass, needle-and-thread grass, Sandberg bluegrass, prairie junegrass, threadleaf sedge, bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), and Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis). Common associated shrubs are big sagebrush, fringed sagewort, gray low sagebrush (A. arbuscula spp. arbuscula), rubber rabbitbrush, green rabbitbrush (C. viscidiflorus), gray horsebrush (Tetradymia canescens), and broom snakeweed. Exotics include cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) [,49,60,66,72,79,83]. A bluebunch wheatgrass/plains prickly pear habitat type has been described for west-central Idaho [25,95,96].

In montane Utah, Nevada, and western Colorado, common plant associates are Colorado pinyon (Pinus edulis), Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma), true mountain-mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus), Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii), Utah serviceberry (Amelanchier utahensis), big sagebrush, black sagebrush (A. nova), budsage (A. spinescens), spiny hopsage (Grayia spinosa), shadscale, winterfat, Gardner's saltbush, green rabbitbrush, Hood's phlox (Phlox hoodii), and white sage (Kochia americana). Grasses include Indian ricegrass (Achnatherum hymenoides), bottlebrush squirreltail (Elymus elymoides), saline wildrye (Leymus salinus), and mutton grass (Poa fendleriana) [3,25,31,78].

In the southern Great Plains region of northern Texas, western Oklahoma, and eastern New Mexico, common plant associates include blue grama, buffalo grass, western wheatgrass, threeawn (Aristida spp.), lovegrass (Eragrostis spp.), sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula), tobosa (Pleuraphis mutica), galleta (P. jamesii), and vine mesquite (Panicum obtusum). Dominant woody plants are broom snakeweed, sand sagebrush (A. filifolia), sand shinnery oak (Quercus havardii), cholla (Opuntia imbricata), soapweed yucca (Yucca glauca), and mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) [28,83].

  • 3. Baker, William L.; Kennedy, Susan C. 1985. Presettlement vegetation of part of northwestern Moffat County, Colorado, described from remnants. The Great Basin Naturalist. 45(4): 747-783. [384]
  • 4. Bayless, Stephen R. 1969. Winter food habits, range use, and home range of antelope in Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management. 33(3): 538-550. [16590]
  • 19. Courtney, Rick F. 1989. Pronghorn use of recently burned mixed prairie in Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management. 53(2): 302-305. [6701]
  • 25. Erdman, James A. 1970. Pinyon-juniper succession after natural fires on residual soils of Mesa Verde, Colorado. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin: Biological Series. 11(2): 1-26. [11987]
  • 28. Ford, Paulette L.; McPherson, Guy R. 1996. Ecology of fire in shortgrass prairie communities of the Kiowa National Grassland. In: Warwick, Charles, ed. 15th North American prairie conference: Proceedings; 1996 October 23-26; St. Charles, IL. Bend, OR: The Natural Areas Association: 71-76. [30254]
  • 31. Greenwood, Larry R.; Brotherson, Jack D. 1978. Ecological relationships between pinyon-juniper and true mountain mahogany stands in the Uintah Basin, Utah. Journal of Range Management. 31(3): 164-167. [15654]
  • 40. Hazlett, Donald L. 1998. Vascular plant species of the Pawnee National Grassland. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-17. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 26 p. [29136]
  • 43. Hoffman, G. R.; Timken, R. L. 1970. Ecologic observations on Pinus ponderosa laws. (Pinaceae) at its eastern most extension in South Dakota. The Southwestern Naturalist. 14(3): 327-336. [11502]
  • 44. Houston, Walter R. 1961. Some interrelations of sagebrush, soils, and grazing intensity in the Northern Great Plains. Ecology. 42(1): 31-38. [1196]
  • 57. Looman, J. 1980. The vegetation of the Canadian prairie provinces. II. The grasslands, Part 1. Phytocoenologia. 8(2): 153-190. [18400]
  • 61. Mackie, Richard J. 1970. Range ecology and relations of mule deer, elk, and cattle in the Missouri River Breaks, Montana. Wildlife Monographs No. 20. 79 p. [5897]
  • 78. Rice, Barbara; Westoby, Mark. 1978. Vegetative responses of some Great Basin shrub communities protected against jack-rabbits or domestic stock. Journal of Range Management. 31(1): 28-34. [1964]
  • 79. Ross, Robert L.; Hunter, Harold E. 1976. Climax vegetation of Montana: Based on soils and climate. Bozeman, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 64 p. [2028]
  • 83. Shiflet, Thomas N., ed. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United States. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management. 152 p. [23362]
  • 95. Tisdale, E. W. 1986. Canyon grasslands and associated shrublands of West-central Idaho and adjacent areas. Bulletin Number 40. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho, Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Range Sciences. 42 p. [2338]
  • 96. Tisdale, E.W.; Bramble-Brodahl, Mary. 1983. Relationships of site characteristics to vegetation in canyon grasslands of west central Idaho and adjacent areas. Journal of Range Management. 36(6): 775-778. [2342]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Rangeland Cover Types

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following Rangeland Cover Types (as classified by the Society for Range Management, SRM):

More info for the terms: cover, shrub

SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES [83]:



101 Bluebunch wheatgrass

104 Antelope bitterbrush-bluebunch wheatgrass

105 Antelope bitterbrush-Idaho fescue

107 Western juniper/big sagebrush/bluebunch wheatgrass

301 Bluebunch wheatgrass-blue grama

302 Bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg bluegrass

303 Bluebunch wheatgrass-western wheatgrass

314 Big sagebrush-bluebunch wheatgrass

315 Big sagebrush-Idaho fescue

316 Big sagebrush-rough-fescue

317 Bitterbrush-bluebunch wheatgrass

318 Bitterbrush-Idaho fescue

319 Bitterbrush-rough fescue

323 Shrubby cinquefoil-rough fescue

324 Threetip sagebrush-Idaho fescue

401 Basin big sagebrush

402 Mountain big sagebrush

403 Wyoming big sagebrush

405 Black sagebrush

408 Other sagebrush types

412 Juniper-pinyon woodland

413 Gambel oak

414 Salt desert shrub

415 Curlleaf mountain-mahogany

416 True mountain-mahogany


501 Saltbush-greasewood

502 Grama-galleta

503 Arizona chaparral

504 Juniper-pinyon pine woodland

505 Grama-tobosa shrub

506 Creosotebush-bursage

507 Palo verde-cactus

508 Creosotebush-tarbush

509 Transition between oak-juniper woodland and mahogany-oak association

604 Bluestem-grama prairie

605 Sandsage prairie

606 Wheatgrass-bluestem-needlegrass

607 Wheatgrass-needlegrass

608 Wheatgrass-grama-needlegrass

609 Wheatgrass-grama

610 Wheatgrass

611 Blue grama-buffalo grass

612 Sagebrush-grass

613 Fescue grassland

614 Crested wheatgrass

615 Wheatgrass-saltgrass-grama

701 Alkali sacaton-tobosagrass

702 Black grama-alkali sacaton

703 Black grama-sideoats grama

704 Blue grama-western wheatgrass

705 Blue grama-galleta

706 Blue grama-sideoats grama

707 Blue grama-sideoats grama-black grama

712 Galleta-alkali sacaton

713 Grama-muhly-threeawn

714 Grama-bluestem

715 Grama-buffalo grass

718 Mesquite-grama

727 Mesquite-buffalo grass

729 Mesquite

  • 83. Shiflet, Thomas N., ed. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United States. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management. 152 p. [23362]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Cover Types

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following cover types (as classified by the Society of American Foresters):

More info for the term: cover

SAF COVER TYPES [26]:


68 Mesquite

220 Rocky Mountain juniper

237 Interior ponderosa pine

238 Western juniper

239 Pinyon-juniper

242 Mesquite

  • 26. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Plant Associations

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following plant community types (as classified by Küchler 1964):

More info for the term: shrub

KUCHLER [55] PLANT ASSOCIATIONS:


K011 Western ponderosa forest

K016 Eastern ponderosa forest

K017 Black Hills pine forest

K023 Juniper-pinyon woodland

K024 Juniper steppe woodlands

K031 Oak-juniper woodlands

K037 Mountain-mahogany-oak scrub

K038 Great Basin sagebrush

K039 Blackbrush

K040 Saltbush-greasewood


K043 Paloverde-cactus shrub


K051 Wheatgrass-bluegrass

K053 Grama-galleta steppe

K054 Grama-tobosa prairie

K055 Sagebrush steppe

K056 Wheatgrass-needlegrass shrubsteppe

K057 Galleta-threeawn shrubsteppe

K058 Grama-tobosa shrubsteppe

K059 Trans-Pecos shrub savanna

K060 Mesquite savanna

K063 Foothills prairie

K064 Grama-needlegrass-wheatgrass

K065 Grama-buffalo grass

K066 Wheatgrass-needlegrass

K067 Wheatgrass-bluestem-needlegrass

K068 Wheatgrass-grama-buffalo grass

K070 Sandsage-bluestem prairie

K085 Mesquite-buffalo grass

K088 Fayette prairie

  • 55. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. United States [Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States]. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 1:3,168,000; colored. [3455]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Ecosystem

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in the following ecosystem types (as named by the U.S. Forest Service in their Forest and Range Ecosystem [FRES] Type classification):

ECOSYSTEMS [29]:



FRES21 Ponderosa pine

FRES29 Sagebrush

FRES30 Desert shrub

FRES32 Texas savanna

FRES33 Southwestern shrubsteppe

FRES34 Chaparral-mountain shrub

FRES35 Pinyon-juniper

FRES36 Mountain grasslands

FRES38 Plains grasslands

FRES40 Desert grasslands

  • 29. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Population Biology

Number of Occurrences

Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.

Estimated Number of Occurrences: 81 to >300

Comments: 150+ EO's (Benson).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

Fire Management Considerations

More info for the term: cactus

Frequent fire reduces populations of low-growing Opuntia species like plains pricklypear [7]. Plants that survive in unburned refugia provide parents for regenerating burned areas. Observations of 1,665 plants from 19 succulent species on burned areas Arizona showed that 13% were in unburned refugia [93]; the spatial extent of the refugia was not described.

Fire has been used as a tool to increase the edibility of plains pricklypear and related species for livestock by burning off spines [32,84]. Wildlife consumption of burned plains pricklypear is also a consideration. In southern Alberta, pronghorn were attracted to burned areas to graze on plains pricklypear when spines were singed off green plants [19,88].

Although prescribed burning may effectively control plains pricklypear in some cases, in dry years desirable forage is lost [105,106]. In a 1965 Wyoming study, burning was among 4 treatments tested for controlling plains pricklypear. The other 3 methods were chemical, bulldozer blading over frozen ground, and beating with a tractor attachment. Burning was found to be unsatisfactory because, though cactus kill was estimated to be 70%, an unacceptable amount of preferred vegetation was damaged. At that time, the most successful method was thought to be blading, despite vegetation and soil damage [47].

  • 7. Benson, Lyman; Walkington, David L. 1965. The southern Californian prickly pears--invasion, adulteration, and trial-by-fire. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 52: 262-273. [5267]
  • 19. Courtney, Rick F. 1989. Pronghorn use of recently burned mixed prairie in Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management. 53(2): 302-305. [6701]
  • 32. Hanselka, C. Wayne. 1989. Developing prickly pear as a forage resource. In: Hanselka, C. Wayne; Paschal, Joe C., eds. Developing prickly pear as a forage, fruit, and vegetable resource: Proceedings; 1989 July 14; Kingsville, TX. Kingsville, TX: Texas A&I University: 1-9. [12190]
  • 47. Hyde, Robert M.; Hulett, Arlowe D.; Alley, Harold P. 1965. Chemical and mechanical control of plains pricklypear in northeastern Wyoming. Circular 185. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Agricultural Extension Service, Division of Agriculture. 10 p. [1230]
  • 84. Shoop, M. C.; Alford, E. J.; Mayland, H. F. 1977. Plains pricklypear is a good forage for cattle. Journal of Range Management. 30(1): 12-17. [25528]
  • 88. Stelfox, John G.; Vriend, Harold G. 1977. Prairie fires and pronghorn use of cactus. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 91: 282-285. [5179]
  • 93. Thomas, P. A. 1991. Response of succulents to fire: a review. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1(1): 11-22. [14991]
  • 106. Wright, Henry A. 1986. Manipulating rangeland ecosystems with fire. In: Komarek, Edwin V.; Coleman, Sandra S.; Lewis, Clifford E.; Tanner, George W., compilers. Prescribed fire and smoke management: Symposium proceedings: 39th annual meeting of the Society for Range Management; 1986 February 13; Kissimmee, FL. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management: 3-6. [3092]
  • 105. Wright, Henry A. 1974. Range burning. Journal of Range Management. 27(1): 5-11. [2613]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Plant Response to Fire

More info for the terms: cactus, fuel, low-severity fire, root crown

The succulent stems of pricklypear species are not combustible and without sufficient fuel may suffer little damage from fire [46]. However, it is reported that a related species, brownspine pricklypear (O. phaecantha), is easily killed by fire if the plant's height is less than 1 foot (0.3 m) [107]. In west Texas, Heirman and Wright [41] also reported that brownspine pricklypear less than 2 feet (0.61 m) tall were easily killed by fire because flames readily engulfed the plants. Plains pricklypear postfire mortality may be delayed for 3 or more years. Secondary effects of fire include insect infestation of weakened plants and increased grazing pressure when spines are burned off [,13,14,77,101,105,107]. Studies in Texas showed that the cactus bug and the blue cactus borer prefer burned cactus pads to unburned pads [20,80,85,101]. This preference may increase pricklypear mortality after burning [80]. In Wyoming, Smith and others [87] attributed mortality of plains pricklypear to dehydration following the burn rather than from fire-caused heat damage.

Brownspine pricklypear experienced high die-off following low-severity fire in Texas. Initial mortality was 20%. Insects entered surviving plants through fire-scarred tissue, spreading bacterial and fungal infections. New sprouts appeared within a few weeks following the fire, but many sprouting plants lost their vascular connection to the root because of insect damage and decay. By the end of the 3rd year, mortality exceeded 70%. Most plants surviving through postfire year 3 had sprouted from the root crown. The authors observed that mortality of both burned and unburned plants of brownspine pricklypear increased during years of below average precipitation [13].

  • 13. Bunting, Stephen C.; Wright, Henry A.; Neuenschwander, Leon F. 1980. Long-term effects of fire on cactus in the southern mixed prairie of Texas. Journal of Range Management. 33(2): 85-88. [4271]
  • 20. Davis, Leanna J.; Wangberg, James K. 1984. Interaction of blue cactus borer and pricklypear cactus. In: Britton, Carlton M.; Smith, Loren M., eds. Research highlights--noxious brush and weed control; range and wildlife management. Vol. 15. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University: 33. [762]
  • 41. Heirman, Alan A.; Wright, Henry A. 1973. Fire in medium fuels of west Texas. Journal of Range Management. 26(5): 331-335. [1119]
  • 46. Humphrey, Robert R. 1974. Fire in the deserts and desert grassland of North America. In: Kozlowski, T. T.; Ahlgren, C. E., eds. Fire and ecosystems. New York: Academic Press: 365-400. [1217]
  • 80. Sanders, Richard; Wangberg, James K. 1983. Effects of prescribed burning on host plant selection by the cactus bug. In: Britton, Carlton M.; Guthery, Fred S., eds. Research highlights--noxious brush and weed control; range and wildlife management. Vol. 14. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University: 23-24. [2058]
  • 85. Sickerman, S. L.; Wangberg, J. K. 1983. Behavioral responses of the cactus bug, Chelindea vittiger Uhler, to fire damaged host plants. Southwestern Entomologist. 8(4): 263-267. [4493]
  • 87. Smith, Michael A.; Dodd, Jerrold L.; Rodgers, J. Daniel. 1985. Prescribed burning on Wyoming rangeland. Bull. 810. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming Agricultural Extension Service. 25 p. [2176]
  • 101. Wangberg, James K. 1984. Mechanisms of host plant selection by the cactus bug. In: Britton, Carlton M.; Smith, Loren M., eds. Research highlights--1984 noxious brush and weed control; range and wildlife management. Vol. 15. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University: 33-34. [2451]
  • 107. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1980. Fire ecology and prescribed burning in the Great Plains--a research review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-77. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 60 p. [2618]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Immediate Effect of Fire

More info for the terms: moderate-severity fire, top-kill

Moderate or even low-severity fires can top-kill pricklypear species [7,93,99,106]. Aboveground tissues of Opuntia spp. are easily killed by fire, but some fleshy stem segments usually survive low- to moderate-severity fire and resume growth, even when burned off the parent plant [7,46,49,93,106]. Prickly-pears are vulnerable to mortality from heat generated by fires as well as by actual burning [99]. Hotter fires probably lead to higher mortality, but data are needed [46,93]. 

  • 7. Benson, Lyman; Walkington, David L. 1965. The southern Californian prickly pears--invasion, adulteration, and trial-by-fire. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 52: 262-273. [5267]
  • 46. Humphrey, Robert R. 1974. Fire in the deserts and desert grassland of North America. In: Kozlowski, T. T.; Ahlgren, C. E., eds. Fire and ecosystems. New York: Academic Press: 365-400. [1217]
  • 49. Johnson, Charles Grier, Jr. 1998. Vegetation response after wildfires in national forests of northeastern Oregon. R6-NR-ECOL-TP-06-98. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 128 p. (+ appendices) [30061]
  • 93. Thomas, P. A. 1991. Response of succulents to fire: a review. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1(1): 11-22. [14991]
  • 99. Ugolini, F. C. 1982. Soil development in the Abies amabilis zone of the central Cascades, Washington. In: Oliver, Chadwick Dearing; Kenady, Reid M., eds. Proceedings of the biology and management of true fir in the Pacific Northwest symposium; 1981 February 24-26; Seattle-Tacoma, WA. Contribution No. 45. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, College of Forest Resources: 165-173. [6863]
  • 106. Wright, Henry A. 1986. Manipulating rangeland ecosystems with fire. In: Komarek, Edwin V.; Coleman, Sandra S.; Lewis, Clifford E.; Tanner, George W., compilers. Prescribed fire and smoke management: Symposium proceedings: 39th annual meeting of the Society for Range Management; 1986 February 13; Kissimmee, FL. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management: 3-6. [3092]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Post-fire Regeneration

More info for the term: geophyte

POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY [89]:

Geophyte, growing points deep in soil

  • 89. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 10 p. [20090]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Fire Ecology

More info for the terms: fire severity, layering, root crown, severity, shrub

Plains pricklypear plants are vulnerable to fire [49,93,106]. Plants regenerate by sprouting from the root crown, by layering of unburned or partially burned stem pieces that contact soil, and from seedling establishment [1,13,56,93,97]. 

Many succulents, including plains pricklypear, live in fire-prone habitats with fire frequencies ranging from 1 to 3 years (Canadian prairies), to more than 250 years (Sonoran Desert). Succulent mortality after a fire is often greater than 50%, but rarely total. Authors speculate that increased fire severity causes increased succulent mortality, but data are lacking [46,93].

FIRE REGIMES for plant communities and ecosystems in which plains pricklypear is likely to occur are summarized below. For further information regarding FIRE REGIMES and fire ecology of communities and ecosystems where plains pricklypear is found, see the `Fire Ecology and Adaptations' section of the FEIS species summary for the plant community or ecosystem dominants listed below.

Community or Ecosystem Dominant Species Fire Return Interval Range (years)
bluestem prairie Andropogon gerardii var. gerardii-Schizachyrium scoparium 12,54]
sagebrush steppe Artemisia tridentata/Pseudoroegneria spicata 20-70 [12]
basin big sagebrush A. t. var. tridentata 12-43 [81]
Wyoming big sagebrush A. t. var. wyomingensis 10-70 (40)** [30,108]
saltbush-greasewood Atriplex confertifolia-Sarcobatus vermiculatus
desert grasslands Bouteloua eriopoda and/or Pleuraphis mutica 5-100
plains grasslands Bouteloua spp.
blue grama-needle-and-thread grass-western wheatgrass B. gracilis-Hesperostipa comata-Pascopyrum smithii
blue grama-buffalo grass B. gracilis-Buchloe dactyloides
grama-galleta steppe Bouteloua gracilis-Pleuraphis jamesii
blue grama-tobosa prairie B. gracilis-Pleuraphis mutica
cheatgrass Bromus tectorum
paloverde-cactus shrub Cercidium microphyllum/Opuntia spp. 12]
curlleaf mountain-mahogany* Cercocarpus ledifolius 13-1000 [2,82]
mountain-mahogany-Gambel oak scrub C. l.-Quercus gambelii
blackbrush Coleogyne ramosissima
western juniper Juniperus occidentalis 20-70 
wheatgrass plains grasslands Pascopyrum smithii
pinyon-juniper Pinus-Juniperus spp. 12]
Mexican pinyon P. cembroides 20-70 [65,91]
Rocky Mountain ponderosa pine* P. ponderosa var. scopulorum 2-10 
galleta-threeawn shrubsteppe Pleuraphis jamesii-Aristida purpurea
mesquite Prosopis glandulosa
mesquite-buffalo grass P. g.-Buchloe dactyloides
Texas savanna P. g. var. glandulosa
oak-juniper woodland (Southwest) Quercus-Juniperus spp.
little bluestem-grama prairie Schizachyrium scoparium-Bouteloua spp. 12]
*fire return interval varies widely; trends in variation are noted in the species summary
**(mean)  
  • 1. Ahlstrand, Gary M. 1982. Response of Chihuahuan Desert mountain shrub vegetation to burning. Journal of Range Management. 35(1): 62-65. [296]
  • 2. Arno, Stephen F.; Wilson, Andrew E. 1986. Dating past fires in curlleaf mountain-mahogany communities. Journal of Range Management. 39(3): 241-243. [350]
  • 12. Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 257 p. [33874]
  • 13. Bunting, Stephen C.; Wright, Henry A.; Neuenschwander, Leon F. 1980. Long-term effects of fire on cactus in the southern mixed prairie of Texas. Journal of Range Management. 33(2): 85-88. [4271]
  • 30. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 46. Humphrey, Robert R. 1974. Fire in the deserts and desert grassland of North America. In: Kozlowski, T. T.; Ahlgren, C. E., eds. Fire and ecosystems. New York: Academic Press: 365-400. [1217]
  • 49. Johnson, Charles Grier, Jr. 1998. Vegetation response after wildfires in national forests of northeastern Oregon. R6-NR-ECOL-TP-06-98. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 128 p. (+ appendices) [30061]
  • 56. Laycock, William A. 1983. Hail as an ecological factor in the increase of pricklypear cactus. In: Smith, J. A.; Hays, V. W., eds. Proceedings of 14th International Grassland Congress; 1981; Lexington. 1983: 359-361. [1425]
  • 65. Moir, William H. 1982. A fire history of the high Chisos, Big Bend National Park, Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist. 27(1): 87-98. [5916]
  • 81. Sapsis, David B. 1990. Ecological effects of spring and fall prescribed burning on basin big sagebrush/Idaho fescue--bluebunch wheatgrass communities. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 105 p. Thesis. [16579]
  • 82. Schultz, Brad W. 1987. Ecology of curlleaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius) in western and central Nevada: population structure and dynamics. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 111 p. Thesis. [7064]
  • 91. Swetnam, Thomas W.; Baisan, Christopher H.; Brown, Peter M.; Caprio, Anthony C. 1989. Fire history of Rhyolite Canyon, Chiricahua National Monument. Tech. Rep. No. 32. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit. 47 p. [10573]
  • 93. Thomas, P. A. 1991. Response of succulents to fire: a review. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1(1): 11-22. [14991]
  • 97. Turner, George T.; Costello, David F. 1942. Ecological aspects of the pricklypear problem in eastern Colorado and Wyoming. Ecology. 23(4): 419-426. [2371]
  • 106. Wright, Henry A. 1986. Manipulating rangeland ecosystems with fire. In: Komarek, Edwin V.; Coleman, Sandra S.; Lewis, Clifford E.; Tanner, George W., compilers. Prescribed fire and smoke management: Symposium proceedings: 39th annual meeting of the Society for Range Management; 1986 February 13; Kissimmee, FL. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management: 3-6. [3092]
  • 108. Young, James A.; Evans, Raymond A. 1981. Demography and fire history of a western juniper stand. Journal of Range Management. 34(6): 501-505. [2659]
  • 54. Kucera, Clair L. 1981. Grasslands and fire. In: Mooney, H. A.; Bonnicksen, T. M.; Christensen, N. L.; [and others], technical coordinators. FIRE REGIMES and ecosystem properties: Proceedings of the conference; 1978 December 11-15; Honolulu, HI. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-26. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 90-111. [4389]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Successional Status

More info on this topic.

More info for the terms: climax, cover

Although plains pricklypear is present and often abundant in climax or late-successional communities throughout its range [3,25,37,103], it is often regarded a disturbance-adapted, early seral species [83]. It increases in number in response to disturbances such as drought [103], grazing pressure [79], and severe hailstorms [56]. Plains pricklypear cover decreases as precipitation normalizes following drought [45,97,103].

  • 3. Baker, William L.; Kennedy, Susan C. 1985. Presettlement vegetation of part of northwestern Moffat County, Colorado, described from remnants. The Great Basin Naturalist. 45(4): 747-783. [384]
  • 25. Erdman, James A. 1970. Pinyon-juniper succession after natural fires on residual soils of Mesa Verde, Colorado. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin: Biological Series. 11(2): 1-26. [11987]
  • 37. Hart, Richard H.; Hart, James A. 1997. Rangelands of the Great Plains before European settlement. Rangelands. 19(1): 4-11. [27301]
  • 45. Houston, Walter R. 1963. Plains pricklypear, weather, and grazing in the Northern Great Plains. Ecology. 44(3): 569-574. [1197]
  • 56. Laycock, William A. 1983. Hail as an ecological factor in the increase of pricklypear cactus. In: Smith, J. A.; Hays, V. W., eds. Proceedings of 14th International Grassland Congress; 1981; Lexington. 1983: 359-361. [1425]
  • 79. Ross, Robert L.; Hunter, Harold E. 1976. Climax vegetation of Montana: Based on soils and climate. Bozeman, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 64 p. [2028]
  • 83. Shiflet, Thomas N., ed. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United States. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management. 152 p. [23362]
  • 97. Turner, George T.; Costello, David F. 1942. Ecological aspects of the pricklypear problem in eastern Colorado and Wyoming. Ecology. 23(4): 419-426. [2371]
  • 103. Weaver, J. E.; Albertson, F. W. 1944. Nature and degree of recovery of grassland from the great drought of 1933 to 1940. Ecological Monographs. 14(4): 392-479. [26138]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Regeneration Processes

More info for the terms: cover, diploid, layering, litter

Plains pricklypear reproduces by seeds, layering, and sprouting from segments mechanically separated from the parent plant. Stem die-back in mature clumps can separate the plant into several individuals [56,97]. Detached stems buried in soil or litter may grow horizontally before sprouting [6,38,62,71,97,103]. Root sprouting has been documented in diploid populations of Opuntia polyacantha var. polyacantha in New Mexico [38,70]. Root sprouting may occur in other Opuntia polyacantha populations and  infrataxa, but is poorly documented in the literature and in herbaria specimens [70].

Following a severe July hailstorm in northeastern Colorado, researchers quantified the number of plants that established from the many broken and scattered stem segments. In a pasture with an original plains pricklypear ground cover of 1.2%, the hail detached an estimated 1,660 segments/acre (4,100 segments/ha). In another pasture that had 3.3% plains pricklypear ground cover, 7,700 segments/acre (19,100 segments/ha) were detached by the storm. By August of the following year, 1,400 and 2,400 of the segments had rooted, respectively, in the 2 pastures [56].

Seeds of plains pricklypear fall near the parent plant or are dispersed by mammals that consume the fruits. They are also dispersed when barbs on the fruits or lobes attach to a passing large mammal [45,48,93,97,103,104]. Information on seed longevity was not found.

Seedling growth was measured for 3 years in 22 field plots in northeastern Colorado. By the end of the 3rd growing season plains pricklypear seedlings were only 2.5 to 3 inches (6-8 cm) in length. The diameter of well-developed clumps may increase 3 inches (8 cm) annually. Plains pricklypear clusters 3 feet (0.9 m) in diameter may take as much as 15 years to develop [97].

  • 6. Benson, Lyman. 1982. The cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1044 p. [1513]
  • 38. Harvey, A. D. 1936. Rootsprouts as a means of vegetative reproduction in Opuntia polyacantha. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy. 28: 767-768. [1101]
  • 45. Houston, Walter R. 1963. Plains pricklypear, weather, and grazing in the Northern Great Plains. Ecology. 44(3): 569-574. [1197]
  • 48. Janzen, D. H. 1986. Chihuahuan Desert nopaleras: defaunated big mammal vegetation. Annual Review of Ecological Systems. 17: 595-636. [5018]
  • 56. Laycock, William A. 1983. Hail as an ecological factor in the increase of pricklypear cactus. In: Smith, J. A.; Hays, V. W., eds. Proceedings of 14th International Grassland Congress; 1981; Lexington. 1983: 359-361. [1425]
  • 70. Parfitt, Bruce Dale. 1991. Biosystematics of the Opuntia polyacantha complex (Cactaceae) of western North America. Tempe, AZ: University of Arizona. 115 p. [36592]
  • 93. Thomas, P. A. 1991. Response of succulents to fire: a review. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1(1): 11-22. [14991]
  • 97. Turner, George T.; Costello, David F. 1942. Ecological aspects of the pricklypear problem in eastern Colorado and Wyoming. Ecology. 23(4): 419-426. [2371]
  • 103. Weaver, J. E.; Albertson, F. W. 1944. Nature and degree of recovery of grassland from the great drought of 1933 to 1940. Ecological Monographs. 14(4): 392-479. [26138]
  • 104. Weaver, J. E.; Albertson, F. W. 1956. Grasslands of the Great Plains. Lincoln, NE: Johnsen Publishing Company. 395 p. [2463]
  • 62. Mauseth, James. 2001. [Email to Janet Howard]. January 31. Austin, TX: University of Texas, Department of Botany. On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Science Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. [36546]
  • 71. Parfitt, Bruce. 2001. [E-mail to Janet Howard]. January 15. Flint, MI: University of Michigan, Flint. On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. [36378]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Growth Form (according to Raunkiær Life-form classification)

More info on this topic.

More info for the term: stem succulent

RAUNKIAER [75] LIFE FORM:
Stem succulent
  • 75. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Life Form

More info for the term: cactus

Cactus

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Cyclicity

Phenology

More info on this topic.

More info for the term: phenology

Fruits ripen approximately 2-1/2 months after flowering [70]. The phenology of plains pricklypear over a 1-year period in northern Colorado was as follows [64]:

Pads regreening March
Pads enlarging April
Floral buds developing May
Flowering June/July
Fruit developing July/August
Fruit drop September

Plains pricklypear showed a decline in carbohydrate reserves throughout winter quiescence, regreening of pads, and flowering, with a low point reached at the end of flowering. A maximum in the root carbohydrate reserves was found at fall quiescence [64].

In a southern Colorado study site, plains pricklypear bloomed for 21 to 28 days, beginning in late May. Individual flowers were open from 7-11 hours per day [68].

Flowering generally occurs from June to July in Montana and North Dakota [21].
  • 21. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
  • 64. Menke, John W.; Trlica, M. J. 1981. Carbohydrate reserve, phenology, and growth cycles of nine Colorado range species. Journal of Range Management. 34(4): 269-277. [1639]
  • 68. Osborn, Martha M.; Kevan, Peter G.; Lane, Meredith A. 1988. Pollination biology of Opuntia polyacantha and Opuntia phaeacantha (Cactaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution. 159: 85-94. [3673]
  • 70. Parfitt, Bruce Dale. 1991. Biosystematics of the Opuntia polyacantha complex (Cactaceae) of western North America. Tempe, AZ: University of Arizona. 115 p. [36592]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

Opuntia polyacantha as with other widespread Opuntias is known to reproduce both sexually and asexually, in addition to being self-dispersed and dispersed by animals that eat the fleshy fruits (Valiente-Banuet and Godinez-Alvarez 2002). This species is generally self-incompatible (Osborn et al. 1988).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Opuntia polyacantha

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 0
Specimens with Barcodes: 2
Species With Barcodes: 1
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

National NatureServe Conservation Status

Canada

Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure

Reasons: Widespread throughout the southwestern United States.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2013

Assessor/s
Heil, K., Terry, M. & Corral-Díaz, R.

Reviewer/s
Superina, M. & Goettsch, B.K.

Contributor/s

Justification

Opuntia polyacantha has a very wide range, is abundant, and there are no threats. Hence, it is listed as Least Concern.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
The species is very abundant throughout its range.

Population Trend
Stable
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Comments: Most cacti subject to horticultural collecting.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Major Threats
There are no major threats to this species. A potential threat to species of the genus Opuntia is the invasion of the cactus moth Cactoblastis cactorum, which can exterminate populations completely (Zimmerman et al. 2000).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
The species occurs within many protected areas.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Management considerations

More info for the terms: cacti, cactus, cover, litter, prescribed fire, presence, relict



Land managers often view pricklypear cacti as a mixed blessing.
In some places dense stands of plains pricklypear compete with more desirable forage species and grass production is reduced. However, plains pricklypear grows in sites that will not support a high level of grass production (e.g. drought stricken and dusty, saline, or shallow and gravelly) [32,33,79,103]. Abundant plains pricklypear is sometimes cited as an indicator of poor range condition.

The presence of plains pricklypear can reduce both the production and
availability of forage [87]. Hyde and others [47] reported forage
production doubled where mechanical beaters had been used to control
plains pricklypear.

In the Colorado plains, Bement [5] measured percent cover of plains pricklypear after 25 years of light, moderate, and heavy cattle grazing and observed little effect on the abundance of plains pricklypear. He concluded, "The illusion that pricklypear abundance in this area is associated with heavier grazing is because the pricklypear in the more lightly-used pastures is camouflaged by the ungrazed grass." The cactus was more visible in the heavily grazed areas, thus appearing to be increasing as a result of grazing. He reported no increase in blue grama production after plains pricklypear control (hand clipping at the root crown) but did report that more forage was physically available for grazing.

Plains pricklypear is susceptible to damage by several insects,
including a moth (Melitara dentata), the blue cactus borer (Olycella
subumbrella), and the cactus bug (Chelinidea vittiger) [80,102]. These
insects are favored by moist conditions and can be an effective means of
natural control during wet periods [17]. Both the cactus bug and the
blue cactus borer prefer burned cactus pads (stems) to unburned pads [58,80]. This preference may help to increase pricklypear
mortality after prescribed fire [101].

Because plains pricklypear colonies can survive and even increase during drought, they provide structural protection for more desirable species, usually grasses, to grow and produce seed. Where soil drifting and blowing occurs, the clusters of plants become microsites where topsoil, moisture and litter collect [5,45,103]. The ecology of pricklypears during the drought of the 1930's was closely observed by Weaver and Alberston [103], along with other Great Plains species. Their summary comments about the cacti are excerpted here:

"Interrelations of the short grasses to cactus, especially the opuntias which form large clumps, are of interest and importance. During the years of desiccation when the cactus increased so greatly, it furnished a haven for relict blue grama. It could not be grazed and consequently afforded oases for seed production. With the return of a more favorable environment for the enemies of cactus, their death began...Since the more drought resistant blue grama was often the sole survivor in or near the place where the cactus had grown, the ratio of this species to buffalo grass was often higher in soil formerly occupied by the cactus."

  • 5. Bement, R. E. 1968. Plains pricklypear: relation to grazing intensity and blue grama yield on Central Great Plains. Journal of Range Management. 21: 83-86. [426]
  • 17. Cook, C. W. 1942. Insects and weather as they influence growth of cactus on the Central Great Plains. Ecology. 23(2): 209-214. [673]
  • 32. Hanselka, C. Wayne. 1989. Developing prickly pear as a forage resource. In: Hanselka, C. Wayne; Paschal, Joe C., eds. Developing prickly pear as a forage, fruit, and vegetable resource: Proceedings; 1989 July 14; Kingsville, TX. Kingsville, TX: Texas A&I University: 1-9. [12190]
  • 33. Hanselka, C. Wayne; Paschal, Joe C. 1991. Prickly pear cactus: a Texas rangeland enigma. Rangelands. 13(3): 109-111. [15369]
  • 45. Houston, Walter R. 1963. Plains pricklypear, weather, and grazing in the Northern Great Plains. Ecology. 44(3): 569-574. [1197]
  • 47. Hyde, Robert M.; Hulett, Arlowe D.; Alley, Harold P. 1965. Chemical and mechanical control of plains pricklypear in northeastern Wyoming. Circular 185. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Agricultural Extension Service, Division of Agriculture. 10 p. [1230]
  • 58. Lummus, Patrick F.; Wangberg, James K. 1979. One year life tables for two cactus boring insects. In: Sosebee, Ronald E.; Wright, Henry A., eds. Research highlights--1979 noxious brush and weed control; range and wildlife management. Vol. 10. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University: 22-23. [1487]
  • 79. Ross, Robert L.; Hunter, Harold E. 1976. Climax vegetation of Montana: Based on soils and climate. Bozeman, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 64 p. [2028]
  • 80. Sanders, Richard; Wangberg, James K. 1983. Effects of prescribed burning on host plant selection by the cactus bug. In: Britton, Carlton M.; Guthery, Fred S., eds. Research highlights--noxious brush and weed control; range and wildlife management. Vol. 14. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University: 23-24. [2058]
  • 87. Smith, Michael A.; Dodd, Jerrold L.; Rodgers, J. Daniel. 1985. Prescribed burning on Wyoming rangeland. Bull. 810. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming Agricultural Extension Service. 25 p. [2176]
  • 101. Wangberg, James K. 1984. Mechanisms of host plant selection by the cactus bug. In: Britton, Carlton M.; Smith, Loren M., eds. Research highlights--1984 noxious brush and weed control; range and wildlife management. Vol. 15. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University: 33-34. [2451]
  • 102. Wangberg, James K.; Myers, Deanna. 1979. Biotic factors affecting the distribution and population size of cactus boring insects. In: Sosebee, Ronald E.; Wright, Henry A., eds. Research highlights--1979 noxious brush and weed control; range and wildlife management. Vol. 10. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University: 22. [2452]
  • 103. Weaver, J. E.; Albertson, F. W. 1944. Nature and degree of recovery of grassland from the great drought of 1933 to 1940. Ecological Monographs. 14(4): 392-479. [26138]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems

Benefits

Cover Value

More info for the term: cover

In Texas, northern bobwhite quail rely on plains pricklypear for cover while traveling and escape from predators. Many other small birds and mammals rely on pricklypear species for protective cover [33,59].

  • 33. Hanselka, C. Wayne; Paschal, Joe C. 1991. Prickly pear cactus: a Texas rangeland enigma. Rangelands. 13(3): 109-111. [15369]
  • 59. Lundgren, G. K.; Whitson, R. E.; Ueckert, D. E.; [and others]. 1981. Assessment of the pricklypear problem on Texas rangeland. MP-1483. College Station, TX: The Texas A&M University System, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. 21 p. [1488]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Palatability



The palatability of plains pricklypear to livestock and wildlife is generally considered poor to fair, because spines deter grazing [21]. When spines are singed off by wildfires not severe enough to destroy the plants, plains pricklypear becomes a desirable food source [19,88]. Cattle ranchers in the
southwestern U.S. burn plains pricklypear plants to remove spines and rendering them fit for livestock consumption [32,84].

  • 19. Courtney, Rick F. 1989. Pronghorn use of recently burned mixed prairie in Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management. 53(2): 302-305. [6701]
  • 21. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
  • 32. Hanselka, C. Wayne. 1989. Developing prickly pear as a forage resource. In: Hanselka, C. Wayne; Paschal, Joe C., eds. Developing prickly pear as a forage, fruit, and vegetable resource: Proceedings; 1989 July 14; Kingsville, TX. Kingsville, TX: Texas A&I University: 1-9. [12190]
  • 84. Shoop, M. C.; Alford, E. J.; Mayland, H. F. 1977. Plains pricklypear is a good forage for cattle. Journal of Range Management. 30(1): 12-17. [25528]
  • 88. Stelfox, John G.; Vriend, Harold G. 1977. Prairie fires and pronghorn use of cactus. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 91: 282-285. [5179]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Other uses and values

Many species of Opuntia pricklypear are used as food by humans [32,33,35,67]. Native Americans ate plains pricklypear fruit raw, dried, or cooked. Fruit was piled on the ground and stirred with branches, rolled or singed with hot coals to remove spines, then split and dried in the sun. The flesh of plains pricklypear was used as a binding agent in garment and weapon making. Ripe fruits were used for dye [15,24,36].

  • 15. Castetter, Edward F. 1935. Ethnobiological studies in the American Southwest. Biological Series No.4: Volume 1. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico. 62 p. [35938]
  • 24. Elmore, Francis H. 1944. Ethnobotany of the Navajo. 1(7) Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico. 136 p. [35897]
  • 32. Hanselka, C. Wayne. 1989. Developing prickly pear as a forage resource. In: Hanselka, C. Wayne; Paschal, Joe C., eds. Developing prickly pear as a forage, fruit, and vegetable resource: Proceedings; 1989 July 14; Kingsville, TX. Kingsville, TX: Texas A&I University: 1-9. [12190]
  • 33. Hanselka, C. Wayne; Paschal, Joe C. 1991. Prickly pear cactus: a Texas rangeland enigma. Rangelands. 13(3): 109-111. [15369]
  • 35. Harrington, H. D. 1976. Edible native plants of the Rocky Mountains. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press. 392 p. [12903]
  • 36. Hart, Jeffrey A. 1981. The ethnobotany of the northern Cheyenne Indians of Montana. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 4: 1-55. [35893]
  • 67. Nobel, Park S.; Russell, Charles E.; Felker, Peter; [and others]. 1987. Nutrition relations and productivity of prickly pear cacti. Agronomy Journal. 79: 550-555. [2989]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Nutritional Value



Prickly-pear in the genus Opuntia have been utilized as a forage substitute for grazing livestock in Texas and Mexico for at least a century. It is highly variable in nutrient content, depending on species or variety, age, and plant part. Most research indicates that Opuntia pricklypear are low in protein and phosphorus but high in energy, water, fiber, and ash
[32].

Singed plains pricklypear was evaluated as a cattle forage in Colorado. Plains pricklypear increased total dry matter consumption and weight gain in cattle. Chemical analyses indicated that digestibility of plains pricklypear was at least equal to that of alfalfa
(Medicago sativa) hay. Plains pricklypear contained about 40% more soluble carbohydrates than alfalfa
hay, but only about 3.4% digestible protein. The authors concluded that singed plains pricklypear was palatable and nutritious, but should be supplemented with protein [84].

  • 32. Hanselka, C. Wayne. 1989. Developing prickly pear as a forage resource. In: Hanselka, C. Wayne; Paschal, Joe C., eds. Developing prickly pear as a forage, fruit, and vegetable resource: Proceedings; 1989 July 14; Kingsville, TX. Kingsville, TX: Texas A&I University: 1-9. [12190]
  • 84. Shoop, M. C.; Alford, E. J.; Mayland, H. F. 1977. Plains pricklypear is a good forage for cattle. Journal of Range Management. 30(1): 12-17. [25528]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Importance to Livestock and Wildlife

Plains pricklypear is an important seasonal food of the black-tailed prairie dog, composing up to 58% of its winter diet [10,16,27,53,90].

Pronghorn rely on plains pricklypear [4,92], notably after fire [19,88]. Fires burn the spines off the plants, providing a source of preferred forage.

Other animals reported to eat plains pricklypear include:

northern pocket gopher [100]
bushy-tailed woodrat [50]
Nuttall cottontail [50,60]
black-tailed jackrabbit [60]
white-tailed jackrabbit [23]
desert cottontail [34]
least chipmunk [39]
bison [73,74]
white-tailed deer [32,33]
collared peccary [33,59]
northern bobwhite [33]

Plains pricklypear is regarded as an important emergency forage for livestock. Although the moisture content of aboveground tissues of plains pricklypear is high, nutrient content is low [32,33].

  • 4. Bayless, Stephen R. 1969. Winter food habits, range use, and home range of antelope in Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management. 33(3): 538-550. [16590]
  • 10. Bonham, Charles D.; Lerwick, Alton. 1976. Vegetation changes induced by prairie dogs on shortgrass range. Journal of Range Management. 29(3): 221-225. [3994]
  • 16. Clippinger, Norman W. 1989. Habitat suitability index models: black-tailed prairie dog. Biol. Rep. 82 (10.156). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 21 p. [11725]
  • 19. Courtney, Rick F. 1989. Pronghorn use of recently burned mixed prairie in Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management. 53(2): 302-305. [6701]
  • 23. Dunn, John P.; Chapman, Joseph A.; Marsh, Rex E. 1982. Jackrabbits: Lepus californicus and allies. In: Chapman, J. A.; Feldhamer, G. A., eds. Wild mammals of North America: biology, management and economics. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press: 124-145. [25016]
  • 27. Fagerstone, K. A.; Tietjen, H. P.; Williams, O. 1981. Seasonal variation in the diet of black-tailed prairie dogs. Journal of Mammalogy. 62(4): 820-824. [906]
  • 32. Hanselka, C. Wayne. 1989. Developing prickly pear as a forage resource. In: Hanselka, C. Wayne; Paschal, Joe C., eds. Developing prickly pear as a forage, fruit, and vegetable resource: Proceedings; 1989 July 14; Kingsville, TX. Kingsville, TX: Texas A&I University: 1-9. [12190]
  • 33. Hanselka, C. Wayne; Paschal, Joe C. 1991. Prickly pear cactus: a Texas rangeland enigma. Rangelands. 13(3): 109-111. [15369]
  • 34. Hansen, Richard M.; Gold, Ilyse K. 1977. Black-tailed prairie dogs, desert cottontails and cattle trophic relations on shortgrass range. Journal of Range Management. 30(3): 210-214. [4644]
  • 39. Haufler, Jonathan B.; Nagy, Julius G. 1984. Summer food habits of a small mammal community in the pinyon-juniper ecosystem. The Great Basin Naturalist. 44(1): 145-150. [23856]
  • 50. Johnson, Mark K.; Hansen, Richard M. 1979. Foods of cottontails and woodrats in south-central Idaho. Journal of Mammalogy. 60(1): 213-215. [23859]
  • 53. Koford, Carl B. 1958. Prairie dogs, whitefaces, and blue grama. Wildlife Monographs No. 3. Washington, DC: The Wildlife Society. 78 p. [4077]
  • 60. MacCracken, James G.; Hansen, Richard M. 1984. Seasonal foods of blacktail jackrabbits and Nuttall cottontails in southeastern Idaho. Journal of Range Management. 37(3): 256-259. [25010]
  • 73. Peden, D. G.; Van Dyne, G. M.; Rice, R. W.; Hansen, R. M. 1974. The trophic ecology of Bison bison L. on shortgrass plains. Journal of Applied Ecology. 11: 489-497. [1861]
  • 74. Peden, Donald G. 1976. Botanical composition of bison diets on shortgrass plains. The American Midland Naturalist. 96(1): 225-229. [24596]
  • 88. Stelfox, John G.; Vriend, Harold G. 1977. Prairie fires and pronghorn use of cactus. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 91: 282-285. [5179]
  • 90. Summers, Carol A.; Linder, Raymond L. 1978. Food habits of the black-tailed prairie dog in western South Dakota. Journal of Range Management. 31(2): 134-136. [2294]
  • 92. Taylor, ElRoy. 1972. Food habits and feeding behavior of pronghorn antelope in the Red Desert of Wyoming. In: Proceedings 3rd biennial pronghorn antelope workshop; Billings, MT: 211-221. [2309]
  • 100. Vaughan, Terry A. 1967. Food habits of the northern pocket gopher. The American Midland Naturalist. 77(1): 176-189. [2427]
  • 59. Lundgren, G. K.; Whitson, R. E.; Ueckert, D. E.; [and others]. 1981. Assessment of the pricklypear problem on Texas rangeland. MP-1483. College Station, TX: The Texas A&M University System, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. 21 p. [1488]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Opuntia polyacantha

Opuntia polyacantha is a common species of cactus known by the common names plains pricklypear,[1][2] hairspine cactus,[1] panhandle pricklypear,[3] and starvation pricklypear.[4] It is native to North America, where it is widespread in Western Canada, the Great Plains, the central and Western United States, and Chihuahua in northern Mexico.[3][4]

This cactus grows in a wide variety of habitat types, including sagebrush, Ponderosa pine forest, prairie, savanna, shrublands, shrubsteppe, chaparral, pinyon-juniper woodland, and scrub.[1]

Description[edit]

Opuntia polyacantha grows up to 40 centimetres (16 in) tall. It forms low mats of pads which may be 2–3 metres (6.6–9.8 ft) wide.[1] Its succulent green pads are oval or circular and reach 27 by 18 centimetres (10.6 by 7.1 in) wide. Its areoles are tipped with woolly brown fibers and glochids. Many of the areoles have spines which are quite variable in size and shape. They may be 0.4 to 18.5 centimetres (0.16 to 7.28 in) in length, stout or thin, straight or curling, and any of a variety of colors.

The flowers are 2.5 to 4 centimetres (0.98 to 1.57 in) long and may be yellow or magenta in color. The fruit is cylindrical, brownish, dry and spiny.[4] The cactus reproduces by seed, by layering, and by resprouting from detached segments.[1]

Uses[edit]

Native Americans used it as a medicinal plant, with different parts treating various symptoms. [5]

This pricklypear provides food for many types of animals. It provides over half the winter food for the black-tailed prairie dog in one area. Pronghorn deer eat it, especially after the spines are burned off in wildfires. Ranchers intentionally burn stands of the plant to make it palatable for livestock when little other food is available. It will also grow in waste areas where good forage will not take hold. In fact, an abundance of the cactus indicates land that is poor in quality.[1]

Several insects attack the cactus, including the cactus moth Melitara dentata, the blue cactus borer Olycella subumbrella, and the cactus bug Chelinidea vittiger.[1]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Johnson, K. A. 2000. Opuntia polyacantha. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Retrieved May 11, 2011.
  2. ^ Opuntia polyacantha. USDA Plants Profile. Retrieved May 11, 2011.
  3. ^ a b Opuntia polyacantha. The Nature Conservancy. Retrieved May 11, 2011.
  4. ^ a b c Opuntia polyacantha. Flora of North America. Retrieved May 11, 2011.
  5. ^ University of Michigan - Dearborn: Native American Ethnobotany (Opuntia polyacantha)
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Notes

Comments

Populations of Opuntia polyacantha with spines few or absent (especially var. hystricina) were the basis for several names including O. juniperina, O. utahensis, and O. rhodantha.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: Distinct taxon.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Common Names

plains pricklypear

plains prickly-pear

hairspine cactus

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5


The fully documented scientific name of plains pricklypear is Opuntia
polyacantha Haw. (Cactaceae) [6,30,42,51,69]. Infrataxa are as follows
[69,70,71]:

Opuntia polyacantha var. arenaria (Englm.) Parfitt

Opuntia polyacantha var. erinacea (Englm.) Parfitt

Opuntia polyacantha var. hysricina (Engelm.) Parfitt

Opuntia polyacantha var. nicholii (L. Benson) Parfitt

Opuntia polyacantha. var. polyacantha

Grizzlybear pricklypear (Opuntia × columbiana Griffiths) is a brittle
pricklypear × little pricklypear (O. fragilis) hybrid [69].

  • 6. Benson, Lyman. 1982. The cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1044 p. [1513]
  • 30. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 42. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
  • 70. Parfitt, Bruce Dale. 1991. Biosystematics of the Opuntia polyacantha complex (Cactaceae) of western North America. Tempe, AZ: University of Arizona. 115 p. [36592]
  • 51. Kartesz, John T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume I--checklist. 2nd ed. Portland, OR: Timber Press. 622 p. [23877]
  • 69. Parfitt, Bruce D. 1998. New nomenclatural combinations in the Opuntia polyacantha complex. Cactus and Succulent Journal. 70(4): 189. [36695]
  • 71. Parfitt, Bruce. 2001. [E-mail to Janet Howard]. January 15. Flint, MI: University of Michigan, Flint. On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. [36378]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!