Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (1) (learn more)

Overview

Comprehensive Description

Description

Fourwing saltbush is a polymorphic species varying from deciduous to evergreen, depending on climate. Its much-branched stems are stout with whitish bark. Mature plants range from 1 to over 8 feet in height, depending on ecotype and the soil and climate. Its leaves are simple, alternate, entire, linear-spatulate to narrowly oblong, canescent (covered with fine whitish hairs) and ½ to 2 inches long. Its root system is branched and commonly very deep (to 20 feet) when soil depth allows.

Fourwing saltbush is mostly dioecious, with male and female flowers on separate plants. Male flowers are red to yellow and form dense spikes at the ends of the branches. The female flowers are axillary and nondescript. However, some monecious plants may be found within a population. Fourwing saltbush plants can exhibit hermaphroditic characteristics (male and female parts in one flower). The seed is contained in utricles that turn a dull yellow when ripe and may remain attached to the plant throughout winter.

Fourwing saltbush derives its name from the four membranous ‘winged’ capsules, which encompass the seed. It is most commonly called fourwing saltbush, but is also known as chamise, chamize, chamiso, white greasewood, saltsage, fourwing shadscale, and bushy atriplex.

Public Domain

USDA NRCS Idaho State Office & Aberdeen Plant Materials Center

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Alternative names

Chamise, chamize, chamiso, white greasewood, saltsage, fourwing shadscale, bushy atriplex

Public Domain

USDA NRCS Idaho State Office & Aberdeen Plant Materials Center

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution

National Distribution

Canada

Origin: Unknown/Undetermined

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Unknown/Undetermined

Confidence: Confident

United States

Origin: Unknown/Undetermined

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Unknown/Undetermined

Confidence: Confident

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Fourwing saltbush is the most widely distributed native woody species in North America [108,136,185]. Its native range extends north-south from southern Alberta to central Mexico and east-west from the Missouri River to the Pacific Coast [98,107,135,177,219]. Fourwing saltbush is widely planted in temperate regions of North America as an ornamental, and is locally naturalized east of the plains grasslands, its native boundary [108]. Plants database provides a distributional map of fourwing saltbush and its infrataxa.

Fourwing saltbush is planted worldwide to increase forage production on arid rangelands. It has naturalized on cold, warm, and hot deserts throughout the world [2,16,18].

  • 2. Al-Turki, T. A.; Omer, S.; Ghafoor, A. 2000. A synopsis of the genus Atriplex L. (Chenopodiaceae) in Saudi Arabia. Feddes Repertorium. 111(5-6): 261-293. [42301]
  • 16. Barson, M. M.; Abraham, B.; Malcolm, C. V. 1994. Improving the productivity of saline discharge areas: an assessment of the potential use of saltbrush in the Murray-Darling Basin. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 34(8): 1143-1154. [42487]
  • 98. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
  • 135. Morris, Melvin S.; Schmautz, Jack E.; Stickney, Peter F. 1962. Winter field key to the native shrubs of Montana. Bulletin No. 23. Missoula, MT: Montana State University, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station. 70 p. [17063]
  • 136. Mozingo, Hugh N. 1987. Shrubs of the Great Basin: A natural history. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press. 342 p. [1702]
  • 177. Standley, Paul C. 1961. Trees and shrubs of Mexico. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Press. Vol. 23, part 1. [43936]
  • 185. Stutz, Howard C. 1979. The meaning of "rare" and "endangered" in the evolution of western shrubs. In: Wood, Stephen L., ed. The endangered species: a symposium: Proceedings; 1978 December 7-8; Provo, UT. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Number 3. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University: 119-128. [3876]
  • 219. Wiggins, Ira L. 1980. Flora of Baja California. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1025 p. [21993]
  • 18. Belal, A. H.; Rammah, A. M.; Hopkin, M. S.; [and others]. 1993. Studies of salt-tolerance and chemical analysis of fodder shrubs in Egypt and Utah (USA). In: Towards the rational use of high salinity tolerant plants: Proceedings, 1st ASWAS conference; 1990 December 8-15; Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic: 213-220. [24669]
  • 107. Kartesz, John T.; Meacham, Christopher A. 1999. Synthesis of the North American flora (Windows Version 1.0), [CD-ROM]. Available: North Carolina Botanical Garden. In cooperation with the Nature Conservancy, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [2001, January 16]. [36715]
  • 108. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 3 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

States or Provinces

(key to state/province abbreviations)
UNITED STATES
AZ CA CO ID KS MT NE NM
ND OK OR SD TX UT WA WY

CANADA
AB BC

MEXICO
B.C.N. Chih. Coah. Dgo. S.L.P. Sin. Son. Zac.

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Regional Distribution in the Western United States

More info on this topic.

This species can be found in the following regions of the western United States (according to the Bureau of Land Management classification of Physiographic Regions of the western United States):

BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS [21]:

3 Southern Pacific Border

5 Columbia Plateau

6 Upper Basin and Range

7 Lower Basin and Range

8 Northern Rocky Mountains

9 Middle Rocky Mountains

10 Wyoming Basin

11 Southern Rocky Mountains

12 Colorado Plateau

13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont

14 Great Plains

15 Black Hills Uplift

16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands
  • 21. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution in Egypt

Mediterranean region and Egyptian desert.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Bibliotheca Alexandrina

Source: Bibliotheca Alexandrina - EOL Ar

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Distribution

Native to northwest America.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Bibliotheca Alexandrina

Source: Bibliotheca Alexandrina - EOL Ar

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution: Native of N. America; introduced elsewhere.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Adaptation

Fourwing saltbush is adapted to most soils but is best suited to deep, well drained; loamy to sandy to gravely soils. It is sometimes found growing in dense clay soils. It is very tolerant of saline soil conditions and somewhat tolerant of sodic soil conditions. Under saline conditions plants take up salts and accumulate it in the plants scurfy leaf coverings.

Fourwing saltbush has high tolerance to boron. It does not tolerate high water tables or late winter inundation. It is extremely drought tolerant and has fair shade tolerance. It is not very tolerant of fire, but may resprout to some degree if fire intensity is not too severe. Its ability to tolerate extreme cold conditions varies with ecotype.

Fourwing saltbush most commonly grows in areas that receive 8 to 14 inches annual precipitation. It can be found from sea level to 8,000 feet elevation. Depending on ecotype, fourwing saltbush grows in association with bluebunch wheatgrass, basin wildrye, bottlebrush squirreltail, Indian ricegrass, Sandberg bluegrass, sand dropseed, blue grama, galleta, black grama, alkali sacaton, inland saltgrass, globemallow, greasewood, rabbitbrush, shadscale, Nuttall or Gardner saltbush, winterfat, bud sagebrush, black sagebrush, low sagebrush, Wyoming big sagebrush, and basin big sagebrush.

Public Domain

USDA NRCS Idaho State Office & Aberdeen Plant Materials Center

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. is one of the most widely distributed and important native shrubs on rangelands in the western United States including the Intermountain, Great Basin, and Great Plains regions. Its natural range extends from below sea level to above 8,000 feet elevation. For current distribution, consult the Plant Profile page for this species on the PLANTS Web site.

Public Domain

USDA NRCS Idaho State Office & Aberdeen Plant Materials Center

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Morphology

Description

More info for the terms: cover, diploid, forbs, introgression, mesic, polyploid, resistance, series, shrub, shrubs

Morphology: Fourwing saltbush is a native woody shrub [136]. As a general pattern, fourwing saltbush is erect and round in form, with rigid, brittle stems. It is heavily branched, with tight, thin bark. Lateral branches may bear spines at the tips [90,136,180]. However, fourwing saltbush is extremely variable in physiology, form, and other characteristics. Ecotypes differ in growth rate, winter-deciduousness, drought and cold hardiness, and palatability [74,75,124,126,130,230]. Plants range from low (1 foot (0.3 m)) and semiwoody in South Dakota to tall (>10 feet (3 m)) and woody in parts of the Colorado Desert of Utah and Colorado [88,136,140,183,213]. Common garden experiments using accessions from the northern Great Basin, Sonoran, and Chihuahuan deserts show population differences in stature and other characteristics are primarily driven by genetics [188].

Fourwing saltbush is extremely variable in leaf and fruiting bract morphology [108,136,213]. Leaves range from 0.8 to 2 inches (2-5 cm) long. Young leaves are covered with scales that protect against water loss [136]. Mature leaves have epidermal trichomes (hairlike epidermal outgrowths) that concentrate and exude salts, and on saline sites leaves become covered with a salty covering or scurf [196,208]. Plants are evergreen (in warm climate) to winter-deciduous (in cold climates) [140,208]. Staminate flowers are borne in dense, 2- to 3-mm-wide spikes, and pistillate flowers form 2- to 16-inch-long (5-40-cm) panicles [52,136,213]. The fruits are 0.3- to 0.4-inch-long (0.8-1 cm) utricles, with 0.4- to 1-inch-square (9-25 mm2) bracts [180,213]. Fourwing saltbush is the only species in the genus with 4 large wings on the fruits [108]. Seeds are tightly contained within the utricles, and do not separate from the utricles at dispersal. Seeds measure approximately 1 × 2 mm [180,213], with 17 to 120 seeds/fruit [19].

The root system consists of a taproot and small lateral feeder roots occupying upper soil layers [15]. Where soils allow, taproots often extend more than 20 feet (6 m) [109,140]. In a Colorado pinyon-oneseed juniper community of New Mexico, fourwing saltbush showed the greatest average rooting depth (µ=12.9 ft (3.92 m), range=3.61-25.0 ft (1.10-7.62 m)) of 7 excavated shrub species [65]. In southern California deserts, fourwing saltbush taproots have been found as far as 40 feet (12 m) below the soil surface [47]. Barrow [15] found rhizomatous fourwing saltbush populations in New Mexico.

The above description of fourwing saltbush provides characteristics that may be relevant to fire ecology, and is not meant for identification. Keying out saltbushes, particularly fourwing saltbush, is challenging due to intraspecific variation and introgression with other saltbush species. For example, the type specimen (collected by Meriwether Lewis in 1804 in what is now South Dakota) appears introgressed with Gardner's saltbush [184]. Keys for identifying fourwing and other saltbushes are available (e.g. [52,90,97,108,213]).

Stand structure: Salt desert types with a fourwing saltbush component are generally comprised of scattered shrubs representing few species. Herbaceous cover is sparse; biological soil crusts fill the interspaces in nondegraded systems [31]. For example, on the carbonaceous shale badlands of the Cheyenne River Basin, Wyoming, fourwing saltbush is the only important species. Shrubs are widely spaced, and cover of other shrub species is slight. Few grasses and forbs are present in the understory, and herb reproduction is poor [191]. However, fourwing saltbush ecotypes are highly site-adapted [189], and stand structure can vary considerably with site. Once established, invasive annuals like cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and red brome (B. madritensis ssp. rubens) can contribute considerable understory biomass in salt-desert communities [31].

Physiology: Fourwing saltbush is salt, cold, and drought resistant [4,167]. Southern ecotypes may show superior drought resistance compared to northern ecotypes [130]. In the Hopi and Navajo reservations of northeastern Arizona, fourwing saltbush showed the 2nd most negative internal water potential ( -3.19 MPa) of 7 shrubs tested; only shadscale showed a quantitatively greater ability to withstand water stress [220]. Saline tolerance also varies among populations and infrataxa. For example, some Atriplex canescens var. linearis populations in Sonora, Mexico, grow on high tidelines of Gulf of Mexico estuaries, while inland populations of A. c. var. canescens are less salt tolerant [74]. Polyploid fourwing saltbush populations have experimentally shown greater osmotic capability than diploid populations, whereas in mesic environments, diploid populations show greater growth rates compared to polyploid populations [163]. Generally, increasing chromosome number slows growth, decreases size and palatability, and increases woodiness, frost, and drought tolerance [184,187].

Life span: Fourwing saltbush is long lived. Permanent plots on the Desert Laboratory near Tucson, Arizona, show survivorship of individual shrubs for at least 29 years [76]. Repeat photo series from the Grand Canyon document individual fourwing saltbush surviving over 100 years [27].

  • 52. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 15. Barrow, Jerry R. 1997. Natural asexual reproduction in fourwing saltbrush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. Journal of Arid Environments. 36(2): 267-270. [42451]
  • 19. Belcher, Earl. 1985. Handbook on seeds of browse--shrubs and forbs. Technical Publication R8-TP8. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Region. 246 p. In cooperation with: Association of Official Seed Analysts. [43463]
  • 27. Bowers, Janice E.; Webb, Robert H.; Rondeau, Renee J. 1995. Longevity, recruitment and mortality of desert plants in Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA. Journal of Vegetation Science. 6(4): 551-564. [42371]
  • 31. Bunting, Stephen C.; Kingery, James L.; Hemstrom, Miles A.; Schroeder, Michael A.; Gravenmier, Rebecca A.; Hann, Wendel J. 2002. Altered rangeland ecosystems in the interior Columbia River basin. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-553. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 71 p. (Quigley, Thomas M., ed.; Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Project: scientific assessment). [43462]
  • 47. Conrad, C. Eugene. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated ecosystems of southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 86 p. [4209]
  • 65. Foxx, Teralene S.; Tierney, Gail D. 1987. Rooting patterns in the pinyon-juniper woodland. In: Everett, Richard L., compiler. Proceedings--pinyon-juniper conference; 1986 January 13-16; Reno, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-215. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 69-79. [4790]
  • 74. Glenn, E. P.; Olsen, M.; Frye, R.; Moore, D.; Miyamoto S. 1994. How much sodium accumulation is necessary for salt tolerance in subspecies of the halophyte Atriplex canescens? Plant, Cell and Environment. 17: 711-719. [42457]
  • 76. Goldberg, Deborah E.; Turner, Raymond M. 1986. Vegetation change and plant demography in permanent plots in the Sonoran Desert. Ecology. 67(3): 695-712. [4410]
  • 88. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2d ed. Chicago: The Swallow Press, Inc. 666 p. [6851]
  • 90. Hayes, Doris W.; Garrison, George A. 1960. Key to important woody plants of eastern Oregon and Washington. Agric. Handb. 148. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 227 p. [1109]
  • 97. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 109. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2d ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 126. McArthur, E. Durant; Stevens, Richard; Blauer, A. Clyde. 1983. Growth performance comparisons among 18 accessions of fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens) at two sites in central Utah. Journal of Range Management. 36(1): 78-81. [1583]
  • 136. Mozingo, Hugh N. 1987. Shrubs of the Great Basin: A natural history. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press. 342 p. [1702]
  • 163. Sanderson, Stewart C.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C. 1989. A relationship between polyploidy and habitat in western shrub species. In: Wallace, Arthur; McArthur, E. Durant; Haferkamp, Marshall R., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on shrub ecophysiology and biotechnology; 1987 June 30 - July 2; Logan, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-256. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 23-30. [5919]
  • 167. Schultz, Brad W.; Ostler, W. Kent. 1995. Effects of prolonged drought on vegetation associations in the northern Mojave Desert. In: Roundy, Bruce A.; McArthur, E. Durant; Haley, Jennifer S.; Mann, David K., compilers. Proceedings: wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium; 1993 October 19-21; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-315. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 228-235. [24853]
  • 180. Stephens, H. A. 1973. Woody plants of the North Central Plains. Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas. 530 p. [3804]
  • 183. Stutz, Howard C. 1972. Genetic improvement in crop species as contrasted with possibilities in shrubs. In: McKell, Cyrus M.; Blaisdell, James P.; Goodin, Joe R., eds. Wildland shrubs--their biology and utilization: An international symposium: Proceedings; 1971 July; Logan, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 139-150. [2278]
  • 184. Stutz, Howard C. 1978. Biogeography of saltbush Atriplex in Wyoming. In: Johnson, Kendall L., ed. Wyoming shrublands: Proceedings of the 7th Wyoming shrub ecology workshop; 1978 May 31 - June 1; Rock Springs, WY. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Range Management Division, Wyoming Shrub Ecology Workshop: 9-15. [2280]
  • 187. Stutz, Howard C. 1989. Evolution of shrubs. In: McKell, Cyrus M, ed. The biology and utilization of shrubs. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc: 323-340. [8038]
  • 188. Stutz, Howard C.; Carlson, J.R. 1985. Genetic improvement of saltbush (Atriplex) and other chenopods. In: Carlson, Jack R.; McArthur, E. Durant, chairmen. Range plant improvement in western North America: Proceedings of a symposium at the annual meeting of the Society for Range Management; 1985 February 14; Salt Lake City, UT. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management: 89-92. [2287]
  • 189. Stutz, Howard C.; Pope, C. Lorenzo; Leslie, Thomas. 1975. Germination studies in Atriplex. In: Stutz, Howard C., ed. Wildland Shrubs: Proceedings-- symposium and workshop: 1975 November 5-7; Provo, UT. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University: 150. [2289]
  • 191. Thilenius, John F.; Brown, Gary R.; Medina, Alvin L. 1995. Vegetation on semi-arid rangelands, Cheyenne River Basin, Wyoming. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-263. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 60 p. [26478]
  • 208. Wasser, Clinton H. 1982. Ecology and culture of selected species useful in revegetating disturbed lands in the West. FWS/OBS-82/56. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 347 p. [4837]
  • 213. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 220. Wilkins, Scott D.; Klopatek, Jeffrey M. 1987. Plant water relations in ecotonal areas of pinyon-juniper. In: Everett, Richard L., compiler. Proceedings--pinyon-juniper conference; 1986 January 13-16; Reno, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-215. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 412-417. [10942]
  • 4. Aldon, Earl F.; Cavazos Doria, J. Rafael. 1995. Growing and harvesting fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens [Pursh] Nutt.) under saline conditions. In: Roundy, Bruce A.; McArthur, E. Durant; Haley, Jennifer S.; Mann, David K., compilers. Proceedings: wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium; 1993 October 19-21; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-315. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 299-304. [24860]
  • 75. Glenn, Edward; Moore, David; Sanderson, Stewart; [and others]. 1998. Comparison of growth and morphology of Atriplex canescens varieties occidentalis and angustifolia. The Southwestern Naturalist. 43(2): 176-182. [30092]
  • 108. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 3 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]
  • 124. McArthur, E. Durant; Sanderson, Stewart C. 1984. Distribution, systematics and evolution of Chenopodiaceae: an overview. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 14-24. [1577]
  • 130. Meyer, Susan E. 2003. Atriplex L. saltbush. In: Bonner, Franklin T., tech. coord. Woody plant seed manual, [Online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Producer). Available: http://wpsm.net/Genera.htm [2003, August 27]. [45116]
  • 140. Ogle, Daniel G.; St. John, Loren. 2003. Plant Guide: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45784]
  • 196. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2002. Plant Fact Sheet: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex Canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/factsheet/pdf/fs_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45785]
  • 230. Young, James A.; Kay, Burgess L.; Evans, Raymond A. 1984. Winter hardiness and jackrabbit preference in a hybrid population of fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens). In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard, C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 59-65. [2679]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Description

Shrub, seemingly dioecious, erect, woody, up to c. 60 cm high. Leaves alternate, 2-5 x 0.4-1 cm long, sessile, oblong or linear-oblong, obtuse, entire, narrowed at base, lepidote-farinose, greyish hoary, upper smaller; flowers in a terminal spicate raceme or males in glomerules above. Fruiting bracteoles dentate to subentire, shortly pedicelate, coriaceous, muricate and nerved, c. 5-10 (-12) mm in diameter.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Description

Shrubs, dioecious or rarely monoecious, mainly 8-20 dm, as wide or wider, not especially armed. Leaves persistent, alternate, sessile or nearly so, blade linear to oblanceolate, oblong, or obovate, mainly 10-40 × 3-8 mm, margin entire, apex retuse to obtuse. Staminate flowers yellow (rarely brown), in clusters 2-3 mm wide, borne in panicles 3-15 cm. Pistillate flowers borne in panicles 5-40 cm. Fruiting bracteoles 8-25 mm, as wide, on stipes 1-8 mm, with 4 prominent wings extending the bract length, united throughout, wings dentate to entire, apex toothed, surface of wings and body smooth or reticulate. Seeds 1.5-2.5 mm wide. 2n = 18, 36+.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Diagnostic Description

Synonym

Calligonum canescens Pursh, Fl. Amer Sept. 2: 370. 1814; Atriplex nuttallii S. Watson
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Synonym

Obione canescens (James) Moq., Chenop. Enum. 75. 1840; DC., Prodr. 13 (2): 112. 1849.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat characteristics

More info for the terms: association, diploid, ecotype

Climate/topography: Fourwing saltbush is adapted to desert climates. Temperature gradations across fourwing saltbush's distribution are great.  In northern salt-desert associations, annual precipitation ranges from 6 to 14 inches (150-350 mm); summers are hot and dry; and winters are cold [196]. Within fourwing saltbush's range, there are areas that rarely experience winter frosts. In other areas, winter temperatures may dip to -50 oFahrenheit (-46 oC) [86]. Ability of fourwing saltbush to tolerate cold (and therefore, cold deserts) varies with ecotype [140]. Topography includes dry plains, hills, bluffs, valleys, and riparian corridors [14,80]. In the Great Plains fourwing saltbush is common on barren sites, chalk bluffs, and grassland sites where sod is broken [180].

Water relations: Fourwing saltbush occurs on droughty sites. In the Chihuahuan Desert, fourwing saltbush occurs on deep, fine alluvium soils. Honey mesquite-fourwing saltbush communities occur on arroyos, bajadas, and sites where the water table is 10 to 30 feet (3-10 m) below the surface. Chihuahuan Desert sites where fourwing saltbush codominates with other saltbushes are usually internally drained sinks where chlorides, carbonates, and sulfates accumulate [94]. Johnston [105] describes a fourwing saltbush/western wheatgrass-blue grama community on the Pawnee National Grassland, northeastern Colorado, that occurs on floodplains with fine-textured soils. Fourwing saltbush cannot tolerate high water tables or late-season inundation [140].

Soils supporting fourwing saltbush vary from 10 inches (25 cm) to over 3 feet (0.9 m) in depth [196]. Fourwing saltbush is adapted to all soil textures [23,208]. It is most common on well-drained, sandy to rocky soils [52,80,108,137,196]. It also occurs on denser, clayey soils [196], especially when growing in association with black greasewood [136]. Generally, diploid populations are more likely to occur on sandy soils, while fourwing saltbush populations of higher ploidy level occur on clay substrates. Stutz [187] found diploid populations in the Great Basin grew above ancient (Pleistocene) lake levels, tetraploids occurred on ancient lakeshores, and other polyploids occurred on ancient lake bottoms. In the southern portion of the Guadalupe Mountains, Texas, fourwing saltbush occurs on heavy clay soils on the borders of old lakebeds [32].

Fourwing saltbush tolerates saline, alkaline, boron, and gypsum soils but is not an indicator of such conditions [93,196]. Soil pH in fourwing saltbush communities ranges from slightly acid to slightly alkaline [105]. Maximum soluble salt that fourwing saltbush can tolerate is about 1,300 ppm [86]. On saline sites, the soil around fourwing saltbush plants increases in pH as rains wash the salty scurf from leaves [208].

Elevation: Overall range of fourwing saltbush is from below sea level in California and Texas to over 8,500 feet (2,600 m) in Wyoming [136,154,196]. It is most common from 4,500 to 6,000  feet (1,400-1,800 m) [196]. Elevations by state are as follows:

Arizona < 6,500 ft (2,000 m) [109]
California < 7,000 ft (2,100 m) [137]
Colorado 4,000-8,000 ft (1,200-2,400 m) [88]
Nevada 2,000-7,500 ft (2,000-2,300 m) [108]
New Mexico 3,000-6,500 ft (910-2,000 m) [120]
Texas sea level-7,000 ft (0-2,100 m) [154]
Wyoming >8,500 ft (>2,600 m) [136]
Utah 2,200-7,810 (670-2,380 m) [213]
  • 52. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 14. Barrow, Jerry R. 1992. Use of floodwater to disperse grass and shrub seeds on native arid lands. In: Clary, Warren P.; McArthur, E. Durant; Bedunah, Don; Wambolt, Carl L., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on ecology and management of riparian shrub communities; 1991 May 29-31; Sun Valley, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-289. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 167-169. [19114]
  • 23. Blaisdell, James P.; Holmgren, Ralph C. 1984. Managing Intermountain rangelands--salt-desert shrub ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-163. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 52 p. [464]
  • 32. Burgess, Tony L.; Northington, David K. 1974. Desert vegetation in the Guadalupe Mountains region. In: Wauer, Roland H.; Riskind, David H., eds. Transactions of the symposium on the biological resources of the Chihuahuan Desert region, United States and Mexico; 1974 October 17-18; Alpine, TX. Transactions and Proceedings Series No. 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service: 229-242. [16061]
  • 80. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 86. Hanson, Craig A. 1962. Perennial Atriplex of Utah and the northern deserts. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 133 p. Thesis. [37191]
  • 88. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2d ed. Chicago: The Swallow Press, Inc. 666 p. [6851]
  • 93. Henrickson, James. 1974. Saline habitats and halophytic vegetation of the Chihuahuan Desert region. In: Wauer, Roland H.; Riskind, David H., eds. Transactions of the symposium on the biological resources of the Chihuahuan Desert region, United States and Mexico; 1974 October 17-18; Alpine, TX. Transactions and Proceedings Series No. 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service: 289-314. [16063]
  • 94. Henrickson, James; Johnston, Marshall C. 1986. Vegetation and community types of the Chihuahuan Desert. In: Barlow, Jon C.; Powell, A. Michael; Timmermann, Barbara N., eds. Chihuahuan Desert--U.S. and Mexico, II: Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on resources of the Chihuahuan Desert region; 1983 October 20-21; Alpine, TX. Alpine, TX: Sul Ross State University, Chihuahuan Desert Research Institute: 20-39. [12979]
  • 105. Johnston, Barry C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. 4th ed. R2-ECOL-87-2. Lakewood, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. 429 p. [3519]
  • 109. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2d ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 120. Martin, William C.; Hutchins, Charles R. 1981. A flora of New Mexico. Volume 2. Germany: J. Cramer. 2589 p. [37175]
  • 136. Mozingo, Hugh N. 1987. Shrubs of the Great Basin: A natural history. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press. 342 p. [1702]
  • 137. Munz, Philip A. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
  • 154. Powell, A. Michael. 1988. Trees & shrubs of Trans-Pecos Texas including Big Bend and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks. Big Bend National Park, TX: Big Bend Natural History Association. 536 p. [6130]
  • 180. Stephens, H. A. 1973. Woody plants of the North Central Plains. Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas. 530 p. [3804]
  • 187. Stutz, Howard C. 1989. Evolution of shrubs. In: McKell, Cyrus M, ed. The biology and utilization of shrubs. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc: 323-340. [8038]
  • 208. Wasser, Clinton H. 1982. Ecology and culture of selected species useful in revegetating disturbed lands in the West. FWS/OBS-82/56. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 347 p. [4837]
  • 213. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 108. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 3 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]
  • 140. Ogle, Daniel G.; St. John, Loren. 2003. Plant Guide: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45784]
  • 196. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2002. Plant Fact Sheet: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex Canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/factsheet/pdf/fs_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45785]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Key Plant Community Associations

More info for the terms: association, series, shrub, shrubs, tree

Fourwing saltbush is an important species in Great Basin, Intermountain, Great Plains,
and southwestern desert communities. More often an associate than a plant community dominant [17,25], it
may dominate some sites [85]. It is commonly dominant in sand dune communities
of the Great Basin, Mojave, and Sonoran
deserts [116].

Fourwing saltbush occurs in Great Basin communities including
sagebrush (Artemisia spp.), salt-desert shrubland, blackbrush (Coleogyne
ramosissima), black greasewood (Sarcobatus vermiculatus), mountain brushland,
and Colorado pinyon-oneseed juniper (Pinus edulis-Juniperus monosperma) [3,211]. Fourwing saltbush-dominated communities are typically
imbedded within sagebrush or other nonsalt-desert shrub types in the Great Basin
[31]. Halogeton (Halogeton glomeratus) has invaded some fourwing saltbush communities [158].
Fourwing saltbush merges with sagebrush and creosotebush-white bursage (Larrea
tridentata-Ambrosia dumosa) communities, becoming increasingly dominant in
the Great Basin-Mojave Desert transition zone in southern Nevada
[17,51,84,109,200,211]. It is also common in other Great Basin-Mojave Desert transition
communities including Nevada ephedra (Ephedra nevadensis), Anderson wolfberry
(Lycium andersonii), blackbrush, and creosotebush-white bursage,
shadscale (Atriplex confertifolia), and pale wolfberry-Shockley's
desert-thorn (Lycium
pallidum-L. shockleyi). On the Nevada Test Site, fourwing saltbush codominates with winterfat
(Krascheninnikovia lanata) and is a component of rabbitbrush
(Chrysothamnus spp.), big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata), black sagebrush (A. nova), and singleleaf
pinyon (P. monophylla) communities [85].
In the Mojave and Sonoran deserts, fourwing saltbush may dominate or codominate
salt-desert scrublands and alkali sinks. Silverscale saltbush (Atriplex argentea), allscale (A. polycarpa), and shadscale codominate in
scrublands, while iodinebush (Allenrolfea occidentalis), fewleaf spiderflower (Cleome sparsiflora),
and Parish's glasswort (Salicornia subterminalis) codominate on sinks. Fourwing
saltbush sometimes codominates stabilized and partially stabilized sand dunes.
Typical sand dune codominants include sand verbena (Abronia villosa),
creosotebush, and white bursage [99]. It
is a component of Joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia) and pinyon-juniper (Pinus-Juniperus
spp.) communities [17,51,84,109,211].
Fourwing saltbush also occurs in coastal sage scrub in southern
California [84]. In coastal and interior sage scrub, fourwing saltbush may
associate or codominate with
chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), California sagebrush (Artemisia californica),
and California brittlebush (Encelia californica) [99].
In the Chihuahuan Desert of Texas and New Mexico, fourwing saltbush
occurs in honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa)-fourwing saltbush scrub
and alkali scrub communities [94]. Important associates in
honey mesquite-fourwing saltbush include ironwood (Olneya tesota), blue palo verde
(Cercidium floridum), creosote bush, and tarbush (Flourensia cernua) [61]. Honey mesquite-fourwing
saltbush grades into alkali scrub, tobosa (Pleuraphis mutica), or wetland types
[157,190]. Fourwing saltbush, other saltbushes (Atriplex spp.), and other shrubs
may codominate in alkali scrub, including tubercled saltbush (A. acanthocarpa),
New Mexico saltbush, and iodinebush [94]. Fourwing
saltbush/alkali sacaton communities occur on the Trans-Pecos, High Plains, and
South Plains regions of Texas. Important associates include frankenia (Frankenia
jamesii), alkali muhly (Muhlenbergia asperifolia), and saltgrass (Distichlis
spicata) [32,190]. In New Mexico, fourwing saltbush is most common in salt-desert
shrublands. Fourwing saltbush-black greasewood /alkali sacaton is the most common salt desert shrub
association across the state. In the north, where the Great Basin attains its
southernmost distribution, big sagebrush-fourwing saltbush communities dominate.
Fourwing saltbush also occurs in and sometimes dominates plains sand scrub and
mesa sand scrub of New Mexico [51].
Fourwing saltbush is dominant or, more commonly, sparsely interspersed with
grasses in plains grassland communities [29]. Fourwing saltbush-dominated
communities are a minor series on the Great Plains [114,131]. In Kansas, fourwing saltbush/blue grama
(Bouteloua gracilis) communities occur on shallow, dry soils in association with
hairy grama (B. hirsuta), fragrant sumac (Rhus aromatica), and western
poison-ivy (Toxicodendron rydbergii) [114]. On the Comanche National
Grassland of southeastern Colorado, fourwing saltbush/blue grama communities
occur on hilly sites with deep soils. Plains prickly-pear (Opuntia polyacantha),
galleta (Pleuraphis jamesii), and alkali sacaton (Sporobolus airoides)
are common associates. Other plains grassland communities in
Colorado include fourwing saltbush/western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii)-blue
grama and fourwing saltbush-Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp.
wyomingensis)/western wheatgrass. On the western slope of the Rocky Mountain Front, fourwing
saltbush/needle-and-thread grass (Hesperostipa comata) communities occur on
foothill slopes [105].
Fourwing saltbush occasionally occurs in desert grasslands,
especially those bordering salt-desert shrublands. By the Green and Colorado
rivers, fourwing saltbush is an associate in galleta-threeawn (Pleuraphis
jamesii-Stipeae) shrubsteppe. Important species in galleta-needle-and-thread
grass shrubsteppe of Canyonlands National Park,
Utah, are green ephedra (Ephedra viridis), winterfat, scarlet globemallow
(Sphaeralcea coccinea), and blue grama [214]. 

Fourwing saltbush is sometimes a component of ponderosa pine (Pinus
ponderosa) communities in the Southwest [213].
Vegetation classifications describing communities dominated by
fourwing saltbush are listed below by state and administrative region.
California [99,200]

Colorado [105]

Idaho [54]

Kansas [l113]

Nevada [56,141]

New Mexico [51,66,67]

Texas [94,190]

Wyoming [191]

Region 3 [131]

  • 17. Bauer, H. L. 1930. Vegetation of the Tehachapi Mountains, California. Ecology. 11(2): 263-280. [15102]
  • 25. Booth, D. Terrance. 1985. The role of fourwing saltbush in mined land reclamation: a viewpoint. Journal of Range Management. 38(6): 562-565. [489]
  • 29. Brown, David E. 1982. Plains and Great Basin grasslands. In: Brown, David E., ed. Biotic communities of the American Southwest--United States and Mexico. Desert Plants. 4(1-4): 115-121. [536]
  • 31. Bunting, Stephen C.; Kingery, James L.; Hemstrom, Miles A.; Schroeder, Michael A.; Gravenmier, Rebecca A.; Hann, Wendel J. 2002. Altered rangeland ecosystems in the interior Columbia River basin. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-553. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 71 p. (Quigley, Thomas M., ed.; Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Project: scientific assessment). [43462]
  • 32. Burgess, Tony L.; Northington, David K. 1974. Desert vegetation in the Guadalupe Mountains region. In: Wauer, Roland H.; Riskind, David H., eds. Transactions of the symposium on the biological resources of the Chihuahuan Desert region, United States and Mexico; 1974 October 17-18; Alpine, TX. Transactions and Proceedings Series No. 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service: 229-242. [16061]
  • 51. Dick-Peddie, William A. 1993. New Mexico vegetation: Past, present, and future. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press. 244 p. [21098]
  • 54. Dixon, Mark D.; Johnson, W. Carter. 1999. Riparian vegetation along the middle Snake River, Idaho: zonation, geographical trends, and historical changes. Great Basin Naturalist. 59(1): 18-34. [37548]
  • 56. Emerson, Fred W. 1935. An ecological reconnaissance in the White Sands, New Mexico. Ecology. 16: 226-233. [11166]
  • 61. Ffolliott, Peter F. 1999. Mesquite ecosystems in the southwestern United States. In: Ffolliott, Peter F.; Ortega-Rubio, Alfredo, eds. Ecology and management of forests, woodlands, and shrublands in the dryland regions of the United States and Mexico: perspectives for the 21st century. Co-edition No. 1. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona; La Paz, Mexico: Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste, SC; Flagstaff, AZ: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 95-106. [37053]
  • 66. Francis, Richard E. 1986. Phyto-edaphic communities of the Upper Rio Puerco watershed, New Mexico. Res. Pap. RM-272. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 73 p. [954]
  • 67. Francis, Richard E.; Aldon, Earl F. 1987. An ecological approach to classifying semiarid plant communities. In: Aldon, Earl F.; Gonzales Vicente, Carlos E.; Moir, William H., technical coordinators. Strategies for classification and management of native vegetation for food production in arid zones: Proceedings; 1987 October 12-16; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-150. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 9-14. [2726]
  • 84. Hall, Harvey M.; Clements, Frederic E. 1923. The phylogenetic method in taxonomy: the North American species of Artemisia, Chrysothamnus, and Atriplex. Publication No. 326. Washington, DC: The Carnegie Institute of Washington. 355 p. [43183]
  • 85. Hansen, D. J.; Ostler, W. K.; Hall, D. B. 1999. The transition from Mojave Desert to Great Basin Desert on the Nevada Test Site. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Ostler, W. Kent; Wambolt, Carl L., compilers. Proceedings: shrubland ecotones; 1998 August 12-14; Ephraim, UT. Proceedings RMRS-P-11. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 148-158. [36076]
  • 94. Henrickson, James; Johnston, Marshall C. 1986. Vegetation and community types of the Chihuahuan Desert. In: Barlow, Jon C.; Powell, A. Michael; Timmermann, Barbara N., eds. Chihuahuan Desert--U.S. and Mexico, II: Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on resources of the Chihuahuan Desert region; 1983 October 20-21; Alpine, TX. Alpine, TX: Sul Ross State University, Chihuahuan Desert Research Institute: 20-39. [12979]
  • 99. Holland, Robert F. 1986. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game. 156 p. [12756]
  • 105. Johnston, Barry C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. 4th ed. R2-ECOL-87-2. Lakewood, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. 429 p. [3519]
  • 109. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2d ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 114. Lauver, Chris L.; Kindscher, Kelly; Faber-Langendoen, Don; Schneider, Rick. 1999. A classification of the natural vegetation of Kansas. The Southwestern Naturalist. 44(4): 421-443. [38847]
  • 116. Lei, Steven A.; Lei, Simon A. 1999. Ecology of psammophytic plants in the Mojave, Sonoran, and Great Basin Deserts. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Ostler, W. Kent; Wambolt, Carl L., compilers. Proceedings: shrubland ecotones; 1998 August 12-14; Ephraim, UT. Proceedings RMRS-P-11. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 212--216. [36089]
  • 131. Moir, W. H. 1983. A series vegetation classification for Region 3. In: Moir, W. H.; Hendzel, Leonard, tech. coords. Proceedings of the workshop on Southwestern habitat types; 1983 April 6-8; Albuquerque, NM. Albuquerque, NM: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Region: 91-95. [1672]
  • 141. Ostler, W. K.; Hansen, D. J.; Hall, D. B. 1999. The classification of shrublands on the Nevada Test Site. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Ostler, W. Kent; Wambolt, Carl L., compilers. Proceedings: shrubland ecotones; 1998 August 12-14; Ephraim, UT. Proceedings RMRS-P-11. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 137-147. [36050]
  • 157. Renwald, J. David. 1978. The effect of fire on woody plant selection by nesting nongame birds. Journal of Range Management. 31(6): 467-468. [4459]
  • 158. Rogers, Garry F. 1982. Then and now: a photographic history of vegetation change in the central Great Basin Desert. Salt Lake, UT: University of Utah Press. 152 p. [9932]
  • 190. Texas Natural Heritage Program. 1993. Plant communities of Texas (Series level). Austin, TX: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Unpublished report on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, MT. 26 p. [23810]
  • 191. Thilenius, John F.; Brown, Gary R.; Medina, Alvin L. 1995. Vegetation on semi-arid rangelands, Cheyenne River Basin, Wyoming. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-263. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 60 p. [26478]
  • 200. Vasek, Frank C.; Barbour, Michael G. 1977. Mojave Desert scrub vegetation. In: Barbour, M. G.; Major, J., eds. Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York: John Wiley and Sons: 835-867. [3730]
  • 211. Welch, Bruce L. 1989. Nutritive value of shrubs. In: McKell, Cyrus M., ed. The biology and utilization of shrubs. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc: 405-424. [8041]
  • 213. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 214. West, N.E. 1983. Southeastern Utah galleta-threeawn shrub steppe. In: West, Neil E., ed. Temperate deserts and semi-deserts. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company: 413-421. (Goodall, David W., ed. in chief; Ecosystems of the world; vol. 5). [2509]
  • 3. Aldon, Earl F. 1984. Methods for establishing fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens [Pursh] Nutt.) on disturbed sites in the Southwest. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 265-268. [8029]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Rangeland Cover Types

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following Rangeland Cover Types (as classified by the Society for Range Management, SRM):

More info for the terms: cover, shrub, vine

SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES [173]:

105 Antelope bitterbrush-Idaho fescue

107 Western juniper/big sagebrush/bluebunch wheatgrass

205 Coastal sage shrub

206 Chamise chaparral

210 Bitterbrush

211 Creosote bush scrub

212 Blackbush

310 Needle-and-thread-blue grama

314 Big sagebrush-bluebunch wheatgrass

315 Big sagebrush-Idaho fescue

316 Big sagebrush-rough fescue

317 Bitterbrush-bluebunch wheatgrass

318 Bitterbrush-Idaho fescue

319 Bitterbrush-rough fescue

320 Black sagebrush-bluebunch wheatgrass

321 Black sagebrush-Idaho fescue

322 Curlleaf mountain-mahogany-bluebunch wheatgrass

401 Basin big sagebrush

403 Wyoming big sagebrush

405 Black sagebrush

406 Low sagebrush

407 Stiff sagebrush

408 Other sagebrush types

412 Juniper-pinyon woodland

414 Salt desert shrub

415 Curlleaf mountain-mahogany

416 True mountain-mahogany

417 Littleleaf mountain-mahogany

422 Riparian

501 Saltbush-greasewood

502 Grama-galleta

503 Arizona chaparral

504 Juniper-pinyon pine woodland

505 Grama-tobosa shrub

506 Creosotebush-bursage

507 Palo verde-cactus

508 Creosotebush-tarbush

509 Transition between oak-juniper woodland and mahogany-oak association

601 Bluestem prairie

602 Bluestem-prairie sandreed

603 Prairie sandreed-needlegrass

604 Bluestem-grama prairie

605 Sandsage prairie

606 Wheatgrass-bluestem-needlegrass

607 Wheatgrass-needlegrass

608 Wheatgrass-grama-needlegrass

609 Wheatgrass-grama

610 Wheatgrass

611 Blue grama-buffalo grass

612 Sagebrush-grass

613 Fescue grassland

614 Crested wheatgrass

615 Wheatgrass-saltgrass-grama

701 Alkali sacaton-tobosagrass

702 Black grama-alkali sacaton

703 Black grama-sideoats grama

704 Blue grama-western wheatgrass

705 Blue grama-galleta

706 Blue grama-sideoats grama

707 Blue grama-sideoats grama-black grama

708 Bluestem-dropseed

709 Bluestem-grama

710 Bluestem prairie

711 Bluestem-sacahuista prairie

712 Galleta-alkali sacaton

713 Grama-muhly-threeawn

714 Grama-bluestem

715 Grama-buffalo grass

716 Grama-feathergrass

717 Little bluestem-Indiangrass-Texas wintergrass

718 Mesquite-grama

719 Mesquite-liveoak-seacoast bluestem

720 Sand bluestem-little bluestem (dunes)

721 Sand bluestem-little bluestem (plains)

722 Sand sagebrush-mixed prairie

723 Sea oats

724 Sideoats grama-New Mexico feathergrass-winterfat

725 Vine mesquite-alkali sacaton

727 Mesquite-buffalo grass

728 Mesquite-granjeno-acacia

729 Mesquite

733 Juniper-oak

734 Mesquite-oak

735 Sideoats grama-sumac-juniper
  • 173. Shiflet, Thomas N., ed. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United States. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management. 152 p. [23362]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Cover Types

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following cover types (as classified by the Society of American Foresters):

More info for the term: cover

SAF COVER TYPES [59]:

66 Ashe juniper-redberry (Pinchot) juniper

68 Mesquite

219 Limber pine

220 Rocky Mountain juniper

222 Black cottonwood-willow

235 Cottonwood-willow

237 Interior ponderosa pine

238 Western juniper

239 Pinyon-juniper

240 Arizona cypress

241 Western live oak

242 Mesquite
  • 59. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Plant Associations

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following plant community types (as classified by Küchler 1964):

More info for the term: shrub

KUCHLER [113] PLANT ASSOCIATIONS:

K011 Western ponderosa forest

K016 Eastern ponderosa forest

K017 Black Hills pine forest

K019 Arizona pine forest

K022 Great Basin pine forest

K023 Juniper-pinyon woodland

K024 Juniper steppe woodland

K027 Mesquite bosques

K031 Oak-juniper woodland

K032 Transition between K031 and K037

K033 Chaparral

K035 Coastal sagebrush

K036 Mosaic of K030 and K035

K037 Mountain-mahogany-oak scrub

K038 Great Basin sagebrush

K039 Blackbrush

K040 Saltbush-greasewood

K041 Creosote bush

K042 Creosote bush-bur sage

K043 Paloverde-cactus shrub

K044 Creosote bush-tarbush

K045 Ceniza shrub

K053 Grama-galleta steppe

K054 Grama-tobosa prairie

K055 Sagebrush steppe

K056 Wheatgrass-needlegrass shrubsteppe

K057 Galleta-threeawn shrubsteppe

K058 Grama-tobosa shrubsteppe

K059 Trans-Pecos shrub savanna

K060 Mesquite savanna

K061 Mesquite-acacia savanna

K062 Mesquite-live oak savanna

K064 Grama-needlegrass-wheatgrass

K065 Grama-buffalo grass

K066 Wheatgrass-needlegrass

K067 Wheatgrass-bluestem-needlegrass

K068 Wheatgrass-grama-buffalo grass

K069 Bluestem-grama prairie

K070 Sandsage-bluestem prairie

K072 Sea oats prairie

K073 Northern cordgrass prairie

K074 Bluestem prairie

K075 Nebraska Sandhills prairie

K076 Blackland prairie

K077 Bluestem-sacahuista prairie

K085 Mesquite-buffalo grass

K086 Juniper-oak savanna

K087 Mesquite-oak savanna

K088 Fayette prairie

K090 Live oak-sea oats
  • 113. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. United States [Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States]. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 1:3,168,000; colored. [3455]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Ecosystem

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in the following ecosystem types (as named by the U.S. Forest Service in their Forest and Range Ecosystem [FRES] Type classification):

ECOSYSTEMS [71]:

FRES21 Ponderosa pine

FRES29 Sagebrush

FRES30 Desert shrub

FRES32 Texas savanna

FRES33 Southwestern shrubsteppe

FRES34 Chaparral-mountain shrub

FRES35 Pinyon-juniper

FRES38 Plains grasslands

FRES39 Prairie

FRES40 Desert grasslands
  • 71. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; Lewis, Mont E.; Smith, Dixie R. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Sandy soils, naturalized.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Bibliotheca Alexandrina

Source: Bibliotheca Alexandrina - EOL Ar

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Dispersal

Establishment

Planting: Fourwing saltbush begins growth in mid to late spring. Seed matures 3 to 4 months after flowering. It typically spreads via seed distribution, but may also root sprout following wildfire or layer if covered with sand. Stands typically take three to four years to establish, but once established the plants are fairly competitive with other species. Fourwing saltbush can be established by transplanting in early spring, direct seeding in late fall, early winter or very early spring.

An adapted cultivar/release or local seed source should be used to ensure the ecotype is compatible with the site. Seed should be after-ripened for ten months and dewinged prior to planting. On moist fine soils, seed should be planted ½ inch deep. On sandy to coarse gravely soils, plant up to ¾ inch deep. Seeding rates of 0.25 to 0.50 pounds per acre is recommended for rangeland seeding mixtures (3 to 7 percent of the seeding mix). Dewinged seed is preferred because seed flow through a drill and planting depth can be controlled more easily. There is no prechilling requirement for fourwing saltbush seed. See Seed Production section for additional planting recommendations

Seedling vigor is generally outstanding and depending on ecotype, young plants may reach heights of 18 inches by the end of the first growing season.

Public Domain

USDA NRCS Idaho State Office & Aberdeen Plant Materials Center

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Associations

Known predators

Atriplex canescens (gall tissue (Atriplex canescens)) is prey of:
Orthoptera
Coleoptera
Diptera
Auchenorrhyncha
Sternorrhyncha
Hymenoptera
Papilionoidea
Thysanoptera
Geomyidae
Spermophilus
Asilidae
Torymus capillaceus capillaceus
Rileya tegularis
Galeopsomyia
Tetrastichus cecidobroter
Acaridae
Gelechiidae
Gracilariidae
Asphondylia
Nesolasioptera willistoni
Neolasioptera willistoni

Based on studies in:
USA: California, Cabrillo Point (Grassland)
USA: California, Southern California (Galls, Plant substrate)

This list may not be complete but is based on published studies.
  • L. D. Harris and L. Paur, A quantitative food web analysis of a shortgrass community, Technical Report No. 154, Grassland Biome. U.S. International Biological Program (1972), from p. 17.
  • B. A. Hawkins and R. D. Goeden, 1984. Organization of a parasitoid community associated with a complex of galls on Atriplex spp. in southern California. Ecol. Entomol. 9:271-292, from p. 274.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© SPIRE project

Source: SPIRE

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

Fire Management Considerations

More info for the terms: fire cycle, frequency, fuel, greenstrip, invasive species, natural, shrub, top-kill, wildfire

Restoration: Restoring desert and salt-desert shrublands severely altered by exotic annual grasses and frequent fire presents a great management challenge, and some authors do not believe it is possible [31,228]. Reestablishing fourwing saltbush and other native species means controlling competing vegetation through mechanical and/or herbicidal methods and restricting wildfire. Native species are then established through direct seedings and plantings [118]. Preventing the annual grass-frequent fire cycle through livestock management (restricting grazing to winter and eliminating it altogether during drought), fire prevention, and aggressive management of invasive species may prevent or slow alteration of desert and salt-desert shrublands [23,31]. Recruitment of native species on altered sites may require a decade or longer [31].

Fourwing saltbush is well suited for bare area recovery treatments because it establishes relatively easily from seed (see Value for Rehabilitation of Disturbed Sites). For example, in July 1981, a wildfire burned 62,000 acres (25,100 ha) of big sagebrush, mixed cold-desert shrubland, and Colorado pinyon-Utah juniper in Millard and Juab counties, central Utah. 'Rincon' fourwing saltbush, winterfat, 'Hobble Creek' big sagebrush, and antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) were seeded the following August. The fourwing saltbush cultivar showed good recruitment relative to the other shrub species. Best fourwing saltbush seedling establishment was on bottomlands dominated by black greasewood prior to wildfire. Relative shrub seedling recruitment and growth rates follow. Data are means from August, postfire year 3 [46].

  seedling recruitment (%) Seedling density/acre Height (in.) Crown volume (ft3)
'Rincon' fourwing saltbush 0.24a 1,260 10.9a 2.0a
'Hobble Creek' big sagebrush 0.38a 2,347 3.0b 0.1b
antelope bitterbrush 0.04b 660 5.6b 0.1b
winterfat 0.82c 4,080 6.9b 0.7b
Values in same column followed by different letters are significantly different at p

Fire management: Since sprouting response varies among (and possibly within) fourwing saltbush populations [15,47,57,223], a prefire assessment of local population sprouting capacity is advised before prescribed fires are used. Postfire recovery time will vary, depending upon a population's relative ability to sprout after top-kill.

Fourwing saltbush is well adapted to recover from fire through seedling establishment. It shows good seed dispersal and early successional seedling establishment, even on harsh sites [6,11,14,38,64,93,140]. If an off-site seed source is nearby, natural regeneration from seed is likely to occur within 5 postfire years [140]. Rate of seedling establishment will probably be slower on large burns compared to small burns.

Due to its relatively low flammability, fourwing saltbush is sometimes planted in greenstrip (vegetative fuelbreak) mixes. Greenstripping is especially recommended to decrease spread and frequency of wildfires in desert areas infested with cheatgrass [132,148].

Hazlett [91] provides leaf area indices (useful in fuel modelling) for blue grama-fourwing saltbush shortgrass steppe of eastern Colorado.
  • 6. Anderson, Bertin W.; Ohmart, Robert D.; Disano, John. 1979. Revegetating the riparian floodplain for wildlife. In: Johnson, R. Roy; McCormick, J. Frank, technical coordinators. Strategies for protection and management of floodplain wetlands and other riparian ecosystems: Proceedings of the symposium; 1978 December 11-13; Callaway Gardens, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-12. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 318-331. [4367]
  • 11. Barrow, J. R.; Havstad, K. M. 1992. Recovery and germination of gelatin-encapsulated seeds fed to cattle. Journal of Arid Environments. 22: 395-399. [42403]
  • 14. Barrow, Jerry R. 1992. Use of floodwater to disperse grass and shrub seeds on native arid lands. In: Clary, Warren P.; McArthur, E. Durant; Bedunah, Don; Wambolt, Carl L., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on ecology and management of riparian shrub communities; 1991 May 29-31; Sun Valley, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-289. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 167-169. [19114]
  • 15. Barrow, Jerry R. 1997. Natural asexual reproduction in fourwing saltbrush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. Journal of Arid Environments. 36(2): 267-270. [42451]
  • 23. Blaisdell, James P.; Holmgren, Ralph C. 1984. Managing Intermountain rangelands--salt-desert shrub ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-163. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 52 p. [464]
  • 31. Bunting, Stephen C.; Kingery, James L.; Hemstrom, Miles A.; Schroeder, Michael A.; Gravenmier, Rebecca A.; Hann, Wendel J. 2002. Altered rangeland ecosystems in the interior Columbia River basin. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-553. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 71 p. (Quigley, Thomas M., ed.; Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Project: scientific assessment). [43462]
  • 38. Cavazos Doria, J. Rafael; Aldon, Earl F. 1993. Fourwing saltbrush seedling survival using saline irrigation. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation. 7(3): 243-251. [42452]
  • 47. Conrad, C. Eugene. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated ecosystems of southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 86 p. [4209]
  • 57. Emmerich, F. L.; Tipton, F. H.; Young, J. A. 1993. Cheatgrass: changing perspectives and management strategies. Rangelands. 15(1): 37-40. [20463]
  • 64. Fort, Kevin P.; Richards, James H. 1998. Does seed dispersal limit initiation of primary succession in desert playas? American Journal of Botany. 85(12): 1722-1731. [30069]
  • 91. Hazlett, Donald L. 1992. Leaf area development of four plant communities in the Colorado steppe. The American Midland Naturalist. 127(2): 276-289. [18195]
  • 93. Henrickson, James. 1974. Saline habitats and halophytic vegetation of the Chihuahuan Desert region. In: Wauer, Roland H.; Riskind, David H., eds. Transactions of the symposium on the biological resources of the Chihuahuan Desert region, United States and Mexico; 1974 October 17-18; Alpine, TX. Transactions and Proceedings Series No. 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service: 289-314. [16063]
  • 132. Monsen, Stephen B. 1994. Selection of plants for fire suppression on semiarid sites. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., compilers. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 363-373. [24310]
  • 148. Pellant, Mike. 1990. The cheatgrass-wildfire cycle---are there any solutions? In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 11-18. [12730]
  • 223. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1980. Fire ecology and prescribed burning in the Great Plains--a research review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-77. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 60 p. [2618]
  • 228. Young, James A.; Eckert, Richard E., Jr.; Evans, Raymond A. 1979. Historical perspectives regarding the sagebrush ecosystem. In: The sagebrush ecosystem: a symposium: Proceedings; 1978 April; Logan, UT. Logan, UT: Utah State University, College of Natural Resources: 1-13. [2644]
  • 46. Clary, Warren P.; Tiedemann, Arthur R. 1984. Development of `Rincon' fourwing saltbush, winterfat, and other shrubs from seed following fire. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 273-280. [646]
  • 118. Luke, Forrest; Monsen, Stephen B. 1984. Methods and costs for establishing shrubs on mined lands in southwestern Wyoming. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 286-291. [1485]
  • 140. Ogle, Daniel G.; St. John, Loren. 2003. Plant Guide: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45784]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Broad-scale Impacts of Plant Response to Fire

More info for the terms: shrub, shrubs

In scrublands of the Sonoran Desert, fourwing saltbush and other desert shrubs
successionally replace annuals after fire. In saltbush, creosote bush, and mixed
shrub communities, the general postfire successional sequence begins with Russian-thistle (Salsola kali);
then annual mustards (Sisymbrium
spp. and flaxleaf plainsmustard (Schoenocrambe linifolia)); exotic
annual grasses (Schismus spp. and red brome); ruderal shrubs (e.g., desertbroom (Baccharis
sarothroides) and goldenbush (Isocoma spp.)); and finally, dominance of
fourwing saltbush and other important shrubs ([193] and references
therein).
  • 193. Turner, Raymond M.; Brown, David E. 1982. Sonoran desertscrub. In: Brown, David E., ed. Biotic communities of the American Southwest--United States and Mexico. Desert Plants. 4(1-4): 181-221. [2375]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Plant Response to Fire

More info for the terms: low-severity fire, top-kill

Fourwing saltbush may sprout after top-kill [223]. Some ecotypes fail to sprout, or show only a weak sprouting response [47]. Generally, fourwing saltbush  is poorly adapted to frequent fire [47,57]. It can recover from low-severity fire that mimics browsing by removing some branchwood. Some southwestern fourwing saltbush populations sprout after top-kill by fire [132,216,225]. In a review, Wright and Bailey [223] state fourwing saltbush sprouted after prescribed burning in the southern Great Plains, and was 'fully recovered' by postfire year 3. Conrad [47] reported that fourwing saltbush in southern California does not sprout.

Rhizomatous populations in New Mexico have a denser stand structure than nearby nonrhizomatous populations, presumably due to numerous underground rhizomes [15]. Healthy, rhizomatous fourwing saltbush populations probably recover top-growth rapidly after fire; however, postfire recovery studies have not been conducted on rhizomatous populations.

  • 15. Barrow, Jerry R. 1997. Natural asexual reproduction in fourwing saltbrush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. Journal of Arid Environments. 36(2): 267-270. [42451]
  • 47. Conrad, C. Eugene. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated ecosystems of southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 86 p. [4209]
  • 57. Emmerich, F. L.; Tipton, F. H.; Young, J. A. 1993. Cheatgrass: changing perspectives and management strategies. Rangelands. 15(1): 37-40. [20463]
  • 132. Monsen, Stephen B. 1994. Selection of plants for fire suppression on semiarid sites. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., compilers. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 363-373. [24310]
  • 216. West, Neil E. 1994. Effects of fire on salt-desert shrub rangelands. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., compilers. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 71-74. [24256]
  • 223. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1980. Fire ecology and prescribed burning in the Great Plains--a research review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-77. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 60 p. [2618]
  • 225. Wright, Henry A.; Thompson, Rita. 1978. Fire effects. In: Prairie prescribed burning symposium and workshop: Proceedings; 1978 April 25-28; Jamestown, ND. [Place of publication unknown]: [Publisher unknown]: V-1 to V-12. On file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Lab, Missoula, MT. [3249]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Immediate Effect of Fire

More info for the terms: ecotype, shrub, shrubs, surface fire

Sustained surface fire top-kills or kills fourwing saltbush [47,223], depending upon ecotype.

Fourwing saltbush is fire-resistant compared to most associated shrubs. The salt scurf layer on leaves inhibits burning [47,130,132]. Ether extractives in leaves and stems promote shrub flammability. Rothermel [159] found low ether-extract content (1%, oven-dry weight) for fourwing saltbush. It was the lowest ether-extractive content recorded among 18 California shrub species [81].

  • 47. Conrad, C. Eugene. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated ecosystems of southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 86 p. [4209]
  • 81. Green, Lisle R. 1981. Burning by prescription in chaparral. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-51. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 36 p. [19800]
  • 132. Monsen, Stephen B. 1994. Selection of plants for fire suppression on semiarid sites. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., compilers. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 363-373. [24310]
  • 159. Rothermel, R. C. 1976. Forest fires and the chemistry of forest fuels. In: Shafizadeh, Fred; Sarkanen, Kyosti V.; Tillman, David A., eds. Thermal uses and properties of carbohydrates and lignins. New York: Academic Press: 245-259. [45943]
  • 223. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1980. Fire ecology and prescribed burning in the Great Plains--a research review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-77. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 60 p. [2618]
  • 130. Meyer, Susan E. 2003. Atriplex L. saltbush. In: Bonner, Franklin T., tech. coord. Woody plant seed manual, [Online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Producer). Available: http://wpsm.net/Genera.htm [2003, August 27]. [45116]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Post-fire Regeneration

More info for the terms: adventitious, initial off-site colonizer, rhizome, secondary colonizer, shrub

POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY [182]:
Small to tall shrub, adventitious bud/root crown
Rhizomatous shrub, rhizome in soil (some ecotypes)
Initial off-site colonizer (off-site, initial community)
Secondary colonizer (on-site or off-site seed sources)
  • 182. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. 10 p. [20090]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Fire Ecology

More info for the terms: association, cover, fire exclusion, fire regime, fuel, historical fire regime, litter, natural, root crown, shrub, shrubs, stand-replacement fire, succession, top-kill

Fire adaptations: Given fourwing saltbush's evolutionary plasticity [136,184,185] and ability to establish in early succession [25,70], the species seems well equipped for survival in early postfire communities. With fourwing saltbush's high level of genetic diversity, however, ability to recover from fire vegetatively probably differs among and within populations. Fourwing saltbush population and genetic variation are well studied for a suite of ecologically important traits [74,75,124,126,130,230], but traits affecting fire recovery (ability to sprout and establish from naturally-dispersed seed in postfire environments) are not among them. Ironically, artificial regeneration studies on fourwing saltbush are numerous (see Value for Rehabilitation of Disturbed Sites). As of this writing (2003), studies documenting natural establishment of fourwing saltbush after fire or other disturbance are mostly anecdotal [47,132,216,225]. Given changing FIRE REGIMES in desert environments (see FIRE REGIMES below), fire ecology studies at the population level are badly needed for fourwing saltbush. Until further studies are published, this and other discussions of fourwing saltbush's adaptations to fire remain speculative.

Since seed is generally the most important method of fourwing saltbush reproduction [129,140,185,187], fourwing saltbush probably establishes primarily from seed after fire, with some populations also regenerating vegetatively. Fourwing saltbush shows good seedling establishment on disturbed arid lands [129,185,187]. Presumably, wind-, water-, and animal-dispersed seed begins growth on burns as soon as germination requirements are met.

Vegetative reproduction may be an important method of postfire regeneration in some populations. Some fourwing saltbush ecotypes sprout from the root crown after top-kill by fire [132,216,225]. Sprouting ability varies among fourwing saltbush populations, with sprouting response weak to nonexistent in some populations. For example, populations in southern California are limited to postfire seedling establishment because they do not sprout [47]. Geographic locations of sprouting populations, and the relative strength of their sprouting response, are sparsely documented in the literature.

A fourwing saltbush population in New Mexico is known to sprout from rhizomes [15]. This and other rhizomatous fourwing saltbush populations may be vigorous sprouters after top-kill, but fire studies on rhizomatous fourwing saltbush are lacking. Atriplex canescens var. gigantea layers in response to shifting sands [213], but the sparsely vegetated, unstable sand dune community where it grows rarely, if ever, experiences fire. Further studies are need on the mechanisms of natural fourwing saltbush recovery after fire and other disturbances.

Fuels: Leached fourwing saltbush litter is rated high in flammability [132]. Live shrubs do not easily ignite. With a high ash content and a moderate to high salt content, fourwing saltbush resists burning [30] and is characterized as moderately to highly fire resistant relative to other shrub species [47,130,132]. Moisture of fourwing saltbush is low, and ash and heat content of fourwing saltbush are high, relative to 2 associated southern California coastal sage shrubs ([138] and references therein):

Species May moisture content (%) Ash content (%), foliage & stems Heat content (BTU/lb), foliage & stems (0.25-0.50-in.)
foliage & current leaders (0.12-in. diameter) foliage & stems (0.25-0.50-in.)
fourwing saltbush 173 150 12.4 8,280-8,475
cattle saltbush 347 228 12.2 7,580-8,004
creeping sage (Salvia sonomensis) 277 213 9.8 7,900-8,100

Fuels production in salt-desert shrubland varies from year to year, depending upon precipitation. Production is also related to soil salinity and texture. Herbage production ranges from 0 to 500 lbs/acre (0-560 kg/ha) [216].

FIRE REGIMES: Fourwing saltbush is most common under regimes of infrequent fire and moderate browsing. Although fourwing saltbush responds to partial removal of branches with vigorous growth (a browsing response) [23,45], limited research shows a weak ability to sprout after heavy branch removal or complete removal of top-growth (such as fire accomplishes) [20,33,153]. Salt-desert shrub, desert shrub, and desert grassland communities with fourwing saltbush historically experienced infrequent, stand-replacement fires [147,223]. Although fourwing saltbush fingers into ponderosa pine ecosystems [213], which historically experienced frequent, nonstand-replacement surface fires [8,10,115], it is not common in ponderosa pine. Plains grassland is the one ecosystem with an historical fire regime of frequent, stand-replacement fire where fourwing saltbush is common. With fourwing saltbush's genetic plasticity, populations in plains grasslands may be well adapted to frequent fire. Studies comparing the relative sprouting ability of plains grassland ecotypes with fourwing saltbush ecotypes from less fire-adapted ecosystems may prove instructive. FIRE REGIMES where fourwing saltbush is important are covered in more detail below.

Plains grasslands: Historical fire return intervals cannot be measured precisely in grasslands, but fires were historically prevalent in this type [63]. Mean fire return intervals are estimated at 4 to 20 years, depending upon fuels and ignition sources. Native Americans lighted fires for a number of reasons and were the primary source of ignition in high-use, low-elevation sites where fourwing saltbush grew in association with prairie grasses. Lightning was probably an important source of ignition where fourwing saltbush bordered forested and riparian communities. Shortgrass prairies would burn over large areas until a break in terrain or weather extinguished the fires. Incidence of fire in plains grasslands has greatly decreased since the 1800s due to modern grazing practices, cessation of Native American burning, and fire exclusion [82].

Salt-desert shrubland: Historic fire regimes in desert shrublands are equally difficult to quantify, but on sparsely vegetated salt-desert types, fires were historically rare except under unusual circumstances ([215] and references therein). There are still salt-desert shrublands in the western United States experiencing historic FIRE REGIMES. For example, as of this writing (2003) the well-studied salt-desert communities of  Raft River Valley, southwestern Idaho, have not experienced fire since at least the 1930s [216]. However, historic FIRE REGIMES are no longer operating on many salt-desert sites. Wet years such as those brought by El Niño encourage growth of fine fuels in salt-desert communities. In particular, annual grasses such as cheatgrass and red brome develop enough fine fuel biomass to support wildfires [31,149]. These and other exotic annual grasses have invaded some salt-desert ecosystems that historically experienced infrequent fire, increasing fine fuels and shortening fire return intervals [22,216,231]. Despite older perceptions [102], salt-desert shrublands burn with sufficient fine fuels and an ignition source, especially when fires are accompanied with high winds [216]. Once fire occurs, cover of annuals and probability of subsequent fire increase [31]. Salt-desert communities in Skull Valley, Utah, for example, have experienced cheatgrass-fueled wildfires. Harper [87] found little to no cheatgrass on saltbush and other desert shrub sites on the Desert Experimental Range of west-central Utah in 1959, a dry year. In 1990, a wet year, Sparks and others [175] found the same sites had converted to cheatgrass and other annual weeds "on a massive scale", and fuels were heavy enough to carry fire. Long recovery periods are needed when large-acreage fires occur in salt-desert shrub [30,31]. Frequent fire may preclude establishment of fourwing saltbush and other shrubs and increase the extent of the disturbed area.

Desert shrubland: Historic fire return intervals were variable, ranging between 10 and 100+ years in arid shrublands [218,222]. Fires were not historically important in desert shrublands where grasses were not abundant [103]. However, frequent fires fueled by exotic annuals are now common in desert shrublands, and involve larger acreages than in salt-desert types [218,228]. Fire in Wyoming big sagebrush, where fourwing saltbush is a common component, can spread into salt-desert types. Frequent fire has severely depleted sagebrush, fourwing saltbush, and other fire-sensitive shrubs in the Wyoming big sagebrush type [31].

The following table provides fire return intervals for plant communities and ecosystems where fourwing saltbush may be important. For further information, consult the FEIS summary on the community or ecosystem dominants listed below.

Community or Ecosystem Dominant Species Fire Return Interval Range (years)
California chaparral Adenostoma fasciculatum 147]
bluestem prairie Andropogon gerardii var. gerardii-Schizachyrium scoparium 112,147]
Nebraska sandhills prairie A. gerardii var. paucipilus-S. scoparium < 10
bluestem-Sacahuista prairie A. littoralis-Spartina spartinae 147]
silver sagebrush steppe Artemisia cana 5-45 [96,155,224]
sagebrush steppe A. tridentata/Pseudoroegneria spicata 20-70 [147]
basin big sagebrush A. tridentata var. tridentata 12-43 [165]
Wyoming big sagebrush A. tridentata var. wyomingensis 10-70 (40**) [223,229]
coastal sagebrush A. californica < 35 to < 100
saltbush-greasewood Atriplex confertifolia-Sarcobatus vermiculatus < 35 to < 100
desert grasslands Bouteloua eriopoda and/or Pleuraphis mutica 5-100 [147]
plains grasslands Bouteloua spp. 147,224]
blue grama-needle-and-thread grass-western wheatgrass B. gracilis-Hesperostipa comata-Pascopyrum smithii 147,160,224]
blue grama-buffalo grass B. gracilis-Buchloe dactyloides 147,224]
grama-galleta steppe Bouteloua gracilis-Pleuraphis jamesii < 35 to < 100
blue grama-tobosa prairie B. gracilis-P. mutica 147]
cheatgrass Bromus tectorum 151,218]
paloverde-cactus shrub Cercidium microphyllum/Opuntia spp. 147]
curlleaf mountain-mahogany* Cercocarpus ledifolius 13-1,000 [9,166]
mountain-mahogany-Gambel oak scrub C. ledifolius-Quercus gambelii < 35 to < 100
blackbrush Coleogyne ramosissima < 35 to < 100
juniper-oak savanna Juniperus ashei-Quercus virginiana < 35
Ashe juniper J. ashei < 35
western juniper J. occidentalis 20-70
Rocky Mountain juniper J. scopulorum < 35
creosotebush Larrea tridentata < 35 to < 100
Ceniza shrub L. tridentata-Leucophyllum frutescens-Prosopis glandulosa 147]
wheatgrass plains grasslands Pascopyrum smithii 147,155,224]
pinyon-juniper Pinus-Juniperus spp. 147]
Colorado pinyon P. edulis 10-400+ [62,78,110,147]
interior ponderosa pine* P. ponderosa var. scopulorum 2-30 [8,10,115]
Arizona pine P. ponderosa var. arizonica 2-15 [10,48,169]
galleta-threeawn shrubsteppe Pleuraphis jamesii-Aristida purpurea 147]
mesquite Prosopis glandulosa 128,147]
mesquite-buffalo grass P. glandulosa-Buchloe dactyloides < 35
Texas savanna P. glandulosa var. glandulosa < 10
oak-juniper woodland (Southwest) Quercus-Juniperus spp. 147]
blackland prairie Schizachyrium scoparium-Nassella leucotricha < 10
Fayette prairie S. scoparium-Buchloe dactyloides 204]
little bluestem-grama prairie S. scoparium-Bouteloua spp. 147]
*fire return interval varies widely; trends in variation are noted in the species summary
**mean
  • 10. Baisan, Christopher H.; Swetnam, Thomas W. 1990. Fire history on a desert mountain range: Rincon Mountain Wilderness, Arizona, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 20: 1559-1569. [14986]
  • 9. Arno, Stephen F.; Wilson, Andrew E. 1986. Dating past fires in curlleaf mountain-mahogany communities. Journal of Range Management. 39(3): 241-243. [350]
  • 8. Arno, Stephen F. 2000. Fire in western forest ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 97-120. [36984]
  • 15. Barrow, Jerry R. 1997. Natural asexual reproduction in fourwing saltbrush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. Journal of Arid Environments. 36(2): 267-270. [42451]
  • 20. Benjamin, R. W.; Lavie, Y.; Forti, M.; Barkai, D.; Yonatan, R.; Hefetz, Y. 1995. Annual regrowth and edible biomass of two species of Atriplex and of Cassia sturtii after browsing. Journal of Arid Environments. 29(1): 63-84. [42385]
  • 22. Billings, W. D. 1994. Ecological impacts of cheatgrass and resultant fire on ecosystems in the western Great Basin. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., compilers. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 22-30. [24248]
  • 23. Blaisdell, James P.; Holmgren, Ralph C. 1984. Managing Intermountain rangelands--salt-desert shrub ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-163. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 52 p. [464]
  • 25. Booth, D. Terrance. 1985. The role of fourwing saltbush in mined land reclamation: a viewpoint. Journal of Range Management. 38(6): 562-565. [489]
  • 30. Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech Rep. RMRS-GRT-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 257 p. [36581]
  • 31. Bunting, Stephen C.; Kingery, James L.; Hemstrom, Miles A.; Schroeder, Michael A.; Gravenmier, Rebecca A.; Hann, Wendel J. 2002. Altered rangeland ecosystems in the interior Columbia River basin. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-553. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 71 p. (Quigley, Thomas M., ed.; Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Project: scientific assessment). [43462]
  • 33. Buwai, M.; Trlica, M. J. 1977. Multiple defoliation effects on herbage yield, vigor, and total nonstructural carbohydrates of five range species. Journal of Range Management. 30(3): 164-171. [576]
  • 45. Clark, William R.; Medcraft, J. Richard. 1986. Wildlife use of shrubs on reclaimed surface-mined land in northeastern Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Management. 50(4): 714-718. [5288]
  • 47. Conrad, C. Eugene. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated ecosystems of southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 86 p. [4209]
  • 48. Cooper, Charles F. 1961. Pattern in ponderosa pine forests. Ecology. 42(3): 493-499. [5780]
  • 62. Floyd, M. Lisa; Romme, William H.; Hanna, David D. 2000. Fire history and vegetation pattern in Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado, USA. Ecological Applications. 10(6): 1666-1680. [37590]
  • 63. Ford, Paulette L.; McPherson, Guy R. 1996. Ecology of fire in shortgrass prairie communities of the Kiowa National Grassland. In: Warwick, Charles, ed. 15th North American prairie conference: Proceedings; 1996 October 23-26; St. Charles, IL. Bend, OR: The Natural Areas Association: 71-76. [30254]
  • 70. Gabbert, W. D.; Schultz, B. W.; Angerer, J. P.; Ostler, W. K. 1995. Plant succession on disturbed sites in four plant associations in the northern Mojave Desert. In: Roundy, Bruce A.; McArthur, E. Durant; Haley, Jennifer S.; Mann, David K., compilers. Proceedings: wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium; 1993 October 19-21; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-315. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 183-188. [24846]
  • 74. Glenn, E. P.; Olsen, M.; Frye, R.; Moore, D.; Miyamoto S. 1994. How much sodium accumulation is necessary for salt tolerance in subspecies of the halophyte Atriplex canescens? Plant, Cell and Environment. 17: 711-719. [42457]
  • 82. Gruell, G.; Bunting, S.; Neuenschwander, L. 1985. Influence of fire on curlleaf mountain-mahogany in the Intermountain West. In: Lotan, James E.; Brown, James K., compilers. Fire's effects on wildlife habitat--symposium proceedings; 1984 March 21; Missoula, MT. General Technical Report INT-186. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 58-72. [1051]
  • 87. Harper, Kimball T. 1959. Vegetational changes in a shadscale-winterfat plant association during twenty-three years of controlled grazing. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 68 p. Thesis. [45366]
  • 102. Humphrey, Robert R. 1955. Forage production on Arizona ranges. IV. Coconino, Navajo, Apache counties: A study in range condition. Bulletin 266. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station. 84 p. [5087]
  • 103. Humphrey, Robert Regester. 1962. Fire as a factor. In: Humphrey, Robert Regester. Range ecology. New York: Ronald Press: 148-189. [41853]
  • 115. Laven, R. D.; Omi, P. N.; Wyant, J. G.; Pinkerton, A. S. 1980. Interpretation of fire scar data from a ponderosa pine ecosystem in the central Rocky Mountains, Colorado. In: Stokes, Marvin A.; Dieterich, John H., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the fire history workshop; 1980 October 20-24; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-81. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 46-49. [7183]
  • 126. McArthur, E. Durant; Stevens, Richard; Blauer, A. Clyde. 1983. Growth performance comparisons among 18 accessions of fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens) at two sites in central Utah. Journal of Range Management. 36(1): 78-81. [1583]
  • 129. Medina T., Jorge Galo; Garza C., Hector. 1987. Range seeding research in northern Mexico. In: Frasier, Gary W.; Evans, Raymond A., eds. Seed and seedbed ecology of rangeland plants: proceedings of symposium; 1987 April 21-23; Tucson, AZ. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service: 246-259. [3900]
  • 132. Monsen, Stephen B. 1994. Selection of plants for fire suppression on semiarid sites. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., compilers. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 363-373. [24310]
  • 136. Mozingo, Hugh N. 1987. Shrubs of the Great Basin: A natural history. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press. 342 p. [1702]
  • 138. Nord, Eamor C.; Countryman, Clive M. 1972. Fire relations. In: McKell, Cyrus M.; Blaisdell, James P.; Goodin, Joe R., eds. Wildland shrubs--their biology and utilization: Proceedings of the symposium; 1971 July; Logan, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 88-97. [1773]
  • 153. Pieper, Rex D.; Donart, Gary B. 1978. Response of fourwing saltbush to periods of protection. Journal of Range Management. 31(4): 314-315. [45836]
  • 155. Quinnild, Clayton L.; Cosby, Hugh E. 1958. Relicts of climax vegetation on two mesas in western North Dakota. Ecology. 39(1): 29-32. [1925]
  • 160. Rowe, J. S. 1983. Concepts of fire effects on plant individuals and species. In: Wein, Ross W.; MacLean, David A., eds. The role of fire in northern circumpolar ecosystems. SCOPE 18. New York: John Wiley & Sons: 135-154. [2038]
  • 165. Sapsis, David B. 1990. Ecological effects of spring and fall prescribed burning on basin big sagebrush/Idaho fescue--bluebunch wheatgrass communities. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 105 p. Thesis. [16579]
  • 166. Schultz, Brad W. 1987. Ecology of curlleaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius) in western and central Nevada: population structure and dynamics. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 111 p. Thesis. [7064]
  • 175. Sparks, Steven R.; West, Neil E.; Allen, Edith B. 1990. Changes in vegetation and land use at two townships in Skull Valley, western Utah. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 26-36. [12732]
  • 184. Stutz, Howard C. 1978. Biogeography of saltbush Atriplex in Wyoming. In: Johnson, Kendall L., ed. Wyoming shrublands: Proceedings of the 7th Wyoming shrub ecology workshop; 1978 May 31 - June 1; Rock Springs, WY. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Range Management Division, Wyoming Shrub Ecology Workshop: 9-15. [2280]
  • 185. Stutz, Howard C. 1979. The meaning of "rare" and "endangered" in the evolution of western shrubs. In: Wood, Stephen L., ed. The endangered species: a symposium: Proceedings; 1978 December 7-8; Provo, UT. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Number 3. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University: 119-128. [3876]
  • 187. Stutz, Howard C. 1989. Evolution of shrubs. In: McKell, Cyrus M, ed. The biology and utilization of shrubs. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc: 323-340. [8038]
  • 213. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 215. West, Neil E. 1983. Intermountain salt-desert shrubland. In: West, Neil E., ed. Temperate deserts and semi-deserts. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company: 375-397. (Goodall, David W., ed. in chief.; Ecosystems of the world; vol. 5). [2507]
  • 216. West, Neil E. 1994. Effects of fire on salt-desert shrub rangelands. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., compilers. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 71-74. [24256]
  • 218. Whisenant, Steven G. 1990. Postfire population dynamics of Bromus japonicus. The American Midland Naturalist. 123: 301-308. [11150]
  • 222. Wright, Henry A. 1986. Manipulating rangeland ecosystems with fire. In: Komarek, Edwin V.; Coleman, Sandra S.; Lewis, Clifford E.; Tanner, George W., compilers. Prescribed fire and smoke management: Symposium proceedings: 39th annual meeting of the Society for Range Management; 1986 February 13; Kissimmee, FL. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management: 3-6. [3092]
  • 223. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1980. Fire ecology and prescribed burning in the Great Plains--a research review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-77. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 60 p. [2618]
  • 224. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1982. Fire ecology: United States and southern Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 501 p. [2620]
  • 228. Young, James A.; Eckert, Richard E., Jr.; Evans, Raymond A. 1979. Historical perspectives regarding the sagebrush ecosystem. In: The sagebrush ecosystem: a symposium: Proceedings; 1978 April; Logan, UT. Logan, UT: Utah State University, College of Natural Resources: 1-13. [2644]
  • 229. Young, James A.; Evans, Raymond A. 1981. Demography and fire history of a western juniper stand. Journal of Range Management. 34(6): 501-505. [2659]
  • 231. Young, James A.; Tipton, Frosty. 1990. Invasion of cheatgrass into arid environments of the Lahontan Basin. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 37-40. [12733]
  • 75. Glenn, Edward; Moore, David; Sanderson, Stewart; [and others]. 1998. Comparison of growth and morphology of Atriplex canescens varieties occidentalis and angustifolia. The Southwestern Naturalist. 43(2): 176-182. [30092]
  • 78. Gottfried, Gerald J.; Swetnam, Thomas W.; Allen, Craig D.; [and others]. 1995. Pinyon-juniper woodlands. In: Finch, Deborah M.; Tainter, Joseph A., eds. Ecology, diversity, and sustainability of the Middle Rio Grande Basin. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-268. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 95-132. [26188]
  • 96. Heyerdahl, Emily K.; Berry, Dawn; Agee, James K. 1994. Fire history database of the western United States. Final report. Interagency agreement: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency DW12934530; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service PNW-93-0300; University of Washington 61-2239. Seattle, WA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station; University of Washington, College of Forest Resources. 28 p. [+ Appendices]. Unpublished report on file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [27979]
  • 110. Keeley, Jon E. 1981. Reproductive cycles and FIRE REGIMES. In: Mooney, H. A.; Bonnicksen, T. M.; Christensen, N. L.; [and others], technical coordinators. FIRE REGIMES and ecosystem properties: Proceedings of the conference; 1978 December 11-15; Honolulu, HI. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-26. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 231-277. [4395]
  • 124. McArthur, E. Durant; Sanderson, Stewart C. 1984. Distribution, systematics and evolution of Chenopodiaceae: an overview. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 14-24. [1577]
  • 130. Meyer, Susan E. 2003. Atriplex L. saltbush. In: Bonner, Franklin T., tech. coord. Woody plant seed manual, [Online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Producer). Available: http://wpsm.net/Genera.htm [2003, August 27]. [45116]
  • 140. Ogle, Daniel G.; St. John, Loren. 2003. Plant Guide: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45784]
  • 147. Paysen, Timothy E.; Ansley, R. James; Brown, James K.; [and others]. 2000. Fire in western shrubland, woodland, and grassland ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-volume 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 121-159. [36978]
  • 149. Pellant, Mike; Reichert, Linda. 1984. Management and rehabilitation of a burned winterfat community in southwestern Idaho. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 281-285. [1869]
  • 169. Seklecki, Mariette T.; Grissino-Mayer, Henri D.; Swetnam, Thomas W. 1996. Fire history and the possible role of Apache-set fires in the Chiricahua Mountains of southeastern Arizona. In: Ffolliott, Peter F.; DeBano, Leonard F.; Baker, Malchus, B., Jr.; [and others], tech. coords. Effects of fire on Madrean Province ecosystems: a symposium proceedings; 1996 March 11-15; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-289. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 238-246. [28082]
  • 225. Wright, Henry A.; Thompson, Rita. 1978. Fire effects. In: Prairie prescribed burning symposium and workshop: Proceedings; 1978 April 25-28; Jamestown, ND. [Place of publication unknown]: [Publisher unknown]: V-1 to V-12. On file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Lab, Missoula, MT. [3249]
  • 230. Young, James A.; Kay, Burgess L.; Evans, Raymond A. 1984. Winter hardiness and jackrabbit preference in a hybrid population of fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens). In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard, C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 59-65. [2679]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Successional Status

More info on this topic.

More info for the terms: cover, reclamation, series, shrub, shrubs, succession

Fourwing saltbush occurs in all stages of succession [70]. In early succession, it creates favorable microsites that can facilitate establishment of later-successional shrubs such as sagebrush [25]. On the proposed nuclear waste site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, fourwing saltbush occurs in both early-successional creosotebush disturbed by heavy equipment and undisturbed creosotebush associations. In blackbrush communities on Yucca Mountain, it occurs on disturbed sites but is nearly absent from undisturbed sites [70]. Near Winnemucca, Nevada, Atriplex canescens var. gigantea is the 1st shrub to establish on active dunes that succeed to big sagebrush/Indian ricegrass (Achnatherum hymenoides) [227]; likewise, fourwing saltbush shows greatest shrub cover and percent composition in early old field succession on blue grama-buffalo grass (Buchloe dactyloides) prairie in northeastern Colorado [49]. Long-term livestock browsing pressure may favor less palatable shrubs. On cattle-grazed mine reclamation sites in Wyoming, seeded fourwing saltbush decreased greatly over 5 years, but facilitated establishment of less palatable taxa such as Wyoming big sagebrush [168]. Fourwing saltbush populations may remain stable or increase on open, relatively undisturbed shrublands. A 100-year repeat photo series from the Grand Canyon shows 89% mortality and 92% recruitment of fourwing saltbush [27].

Fourwing saltbush is somewhat shade tolerant [140] and may occur in open-canopy, mid- to late-successional woodlands and ponderosa pine forest communities [213]. Tress and Klopatek [192] found fourwing saltbush and Fremont's barberry (Mahonia fremontii) dominated the understory (18% cover) of a 90-year-old Colorado pinyon-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) woodland in north-central Arizona.

  • 25. Booth, D. Terrance. 1985. The role of fourwing saltbush in mined land reclamation: a viewpoint. Journal of Range Management. 38(6): 562-565. [489]
  • 27. Bowers, Janice E.; Webb, Robert H.; Rondeau, Renee J. 1995. Longevity, recruitment and mortality of desert plants in Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA. Journal of Vegetation Science. 6(4): 551-564. [42371]
  • 49. Costello, David F. 1944. Natural revegetation of abandoned plowed land in the mixed prairie association of northeastern Colorado. Ecology. 25(3): 312-326. [25703]
  • 70. Gabbert, W. D.; Schultz, B. W.; Angerer, J. P.; Ostler, W. K. 1995. Plant succession on disturbed sites in four plant associations in the northern Mojave Desert. In: Roundy, Bruce A.; McArthur, E. Durant; Haley, Jennifer S.; Mann, David K., compilers. Proceedings: wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium; 1993 October 19-21; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-315. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 183-188. [24846]
  • 168. Schuman, G. E.; Booth, D. T.; Waggoner, J. W. 1990. Grazing reclaimed mined land seeded to native grasses in Wyoming. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 45(6): 653-657. [14164]
  • 192. Tress, James A., Jr.; Klopatek, Jeffrey M. 1987. Successional changes in community structure of pinyon-juniper woodlands on north-central Arizona. In: Everett, Richard L., compiler. Proceedings--pinyon-juniper conference; 1986 January 13-16; Reno, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-215. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 80-85. [4791]
  • 213. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 227. Young, James A.; Blank, Robert R.; Lugaski, Thomas. 1990. Shrub communities of the Lahontan sands. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 260-262. [12860]
  • 140. Ogle, Daniel G.; St. John, Loren. 2003. Plant Guide: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45784]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Regeneration Processes

More info for the terms: dioecious, diploid, formation, introgression, layering, monoecious, natural, polyploid, root crown, selection, shrub, utricle

Fourwing saltbush reproduces from seed, by sprouting, and by layering. Seed spread is the most common form of reproduction [129,140,185,187]. Fourwing saltbush sprouts from the root crown, but it is generally a weak sprouter [208]. Rarely, populations spread from rhizomes or by layering [15,213].

Breeding system: Fourwing saltbush is mostly dioecious, but some populations are predominantly dioecious with a monoecious component that ranges from individuals that are entirely staminate or pistillate to hermaphroditic [13,136,140,213]. Some individuals may change sex (from female to male) in response to environmental stress such as cold, drought, heavy browsing, or prior heavy seed set, reverting to female expression when conditions improve [41,44,68,121,150]. Species ability to change gender is rare. Fourwing saltbush's dioecious-monoecious-hermaphrodite gender system has been termed trioecy [50,123,124,130]. Preferential browsing may alter natural regeneration patterns. On the Central Plains Experiment Range of Colorado, male plants were more common on grazed sites than on sites where cattle were excluded [41]. High ploidy levels are thought to decrease palatability [187], so browsing selection may favor individuals with higher ploidy levels in populations where multiple ploidy levels coexist [44].

Fourwing saltbush shows extreme genetic diversity across geographic and elevational gradients, and has been called the most adaptable shrub in North America [136,184,185]. Genetic changes have facilitated its radiation from its central Mexico geographic center of origin to as far north as southern Canada. Evolving rapidly and showing superior ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions, fourwing saltbush employs every known mechanism of evolution including hybridization, introgression, rapid rates of mutation, and multiple ploidy levels. Diploid individuals (probably the original chromosome state for the species) are now rare, and seldom breed successfully, in northern populations [184,185,188].

Pollination: Flowers are pollinated by wind [69,130,184]. Coupled with easy formation of polyploids, wind pollination facilitates intra- and interspecific hybridization of fourwing and other saltbushes [184,185]. However, dioecy and trieocy tend to reduce rates of successful pollination [189].

Seed production: Fourwing saltbush produces numerous seeds, may of which are unfilled and therefore unviable [12,130]. Polyploid populations tend to produce more unfilled seed than diploid populations [189]. Seed production is often further reduced because browsing animals find the fruits so palatable [43,101,109,196]. There are several insect seed predators that may reduce seed production in fourwing saltbush [134].

Seed dispersal: The abscised fruit, with seed inside, disperses by wind, floodwater, and animal transport [11,14,64,93]. As the only species in the genus with winged fruit, the potential for long-distance wind dispersal is greater for fourwing saltbush seed than seed of other saltbushes [93]. In a southwestern Wyoming experiment, Chambers [40] found fourwing saltbush seed was highly mobile on soil surfaces. Best seed retention occurred in large-diameter (50-cm-wide × 10-cm deep) holes [40]. Dust devils may carry fourwing saltbush fruit for miles [93]. Animals ingest and then disperse the palatable seed in feces. In so doing, they may improve germination rates. Fourwing saltbush seed ingested by cattle and recovered from their droppings showed improved germination compared to noningested seed (µ=14% and 8%, respectively) [11].

Seed banking: Direct studies on fourwing saltbush are not available of this writing (2003). Seed dry-stored in open warehouses was still viable after 15 [130] and 19 years [100], suggesting that fourwing saltbush seed may survive in arid soil seed banks.

Germination: Seed is dormant; fruit bracts and seedcoats present mechanical barriers to germination [189]. Seeds also have chemical dormancy from saponins in the utricle [139]. Seeds therefore require stratification, leaching, and/or scarification for germination [130,139,189,207]. When dormancy breaks, seeds germinate when enough moisture for seed imbibition accompanies warm temperatures [176]. After stratification in the laboratory, 1st germinant emergence was 7 days after sowing; last emergence was 21 days after sowing. Favorable germination temperatures varied with seed source. Best germination occurred at 64 to 75 oFahrenheit (18-24 oC) for seeds colleted in California; at 61 to 64 oFahrenheit (16-18 oC) for New Mexico seeds; and 32 to 37 oFahrenheit (0-3 oC) for seeds from Utah. There are intrapopulation differences in germination requirements. For example, Springfield [176] found that while scarification increased germination of some seed lots, it decreased germination of other seed lots. Atriplex canescens var. gigantea shows higher rates of germination compared to other varieties of fourwing saltbush [136]. In the lab, germination improves when the seed wings are removed or worn away [19]. In the field, intact utricles may favor germination when soil-borne mycorrhizal associates infect fourwing saltbush fruit. Fourwing saltbush seed collected in New Mexico showed significantly better germination and subsequent seedling growth (p<0.01) when left in the utricle compared to seed that was excised from the utricle. Mycorrhizal decay of the utricle probably improves nutrient and water status of both the fungi and their germinant host [12]. Light has no effect on fourwing saltbush germination [176].

Seedling establishment/growth: In arid environments, microtopography that provides partial shade, such as pits and furrows, may be crucial for establishment [129]. On the Jornada Experimental Range, New Mexico, seedling emergence was best (p<0.05) on partially shaded dunes compared to open sites between dunes. Seed planting depth ( 2 or 5 mm) did not affect emergence (p<0.05) [92]. Seedlings from seed collected at different elevations showed genetic adaptation to freezing temperatures. In the greenhouse, all seedlings from 3,000-foot (900-m) elevation died when exposed to freezing temperatures, while 6% of seedlings from 4,000-foot (1,200 m) elevation survived, and 100% of seedlings from 5,900-foot (1,800-m) elevation survived (Young, J. A., as cited in [136]).

Seedlings on favorable sites show rapid growth. Along the Colorado River in Arizona, mean height of seedlings started from outplanted seed ranged from 1 to 1.5 inches (2.5-3.7 cm) in their 1st growing season [6]. Browsing can reduce seedling growth and survivorship [196]. Seedling survival on plots subjected to grasshopper, rabbit, and deer browsing was only 67% of survival on protected control plots [176]. Stands require 3 or 4 years to fully establish [140].

Asexual regeneration: Ability of fourwing saltbush to vegetatively reproduce is genetically variable. Fourwing saltbush may sprout from the root crown after top-growth is removed by fire or browsing [132,216]. However, sprouting vigor varies among populations and is difficult to predict based upon geographic location. Some populations show only a weak sprouting response; others no not sprout at all [47,57]. Basal and branch sprouting is probably an adaptation to browsing [23,45]. Pieper and Donart [153] found plants in south-central New Mexico did not produce basal sprouts when completely protected from browsing. Over 4 years, plants protected from browsing for a year produced 4 times more basal sprouts than continuously-browsed plants [15].

Rarely, populations reproduce by layering or sprouting from rhizomes [15,213]. Atriplex canescens var. gigantea populations in Utah survive on unstable sand dunes by rapidly elongating partially to completely buried stems, which then root [213]. Most fourwing saltbush populations do not rapidly elongate buried stems and apparently cannot  layer in the field [136]. Barrow [15] documented a rhizomatous population in New Mexico. Some populations near Alma, New Mexico, regenerate primarily through rhizomes; other, nearby populations appear to be seed-originated and nonrhizomatous.

  • 6. Anderson, Bertin W.; Ohmart, Robert D.; Disano, John. 1979. Revegetating the riparian floodplain for wildlife. In: Johnson, R. Roy; McCormick, J. Frank, technical coordinators. Strategies for protection and management of floodplain wetlands and other riparian ecosystems: Proceedings of the symposium; 1978 December 11-13; Callaway Gardens, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-12. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 318-331. [4367]
  • 11. Barrow, J. R.; Havstad, K. M. 1992. Recovery and germination of gelatin-encapsulated seeds fed to cattle. Journal of Arid Environments. 22: 395-399. [42403]
  • 12. Barrow, J. R.; Havstad, K. M.; Hubstenberger, J.; McCaslin, B. D. 1997. Seed-borne fungal endophytes on fourwing saltbush, Atriplex canescens. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation. 11(4): 307-314. [27455]
  • 13. Barrow, Jerry R. 1987. The effects of chromosome number on sex expression in Atriplex canescens. Botanical Gazette. 148(3): 379-385. [2860]
  • 14. Barrow, Jerry R. 1992. Use of floodwater to disperse grass and shrub seeds on native arid lands. In: Clary, Warren P.; McArthur, E. Durant; Bedunah, Don; Wambolt, Carl L., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on ecology and management of riparian shrub communities; 1991 May 29-31; Sun Valley, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-289. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 167-169. [19114]
  • 15. Barrow, Jerry R. 1997. Natural asexual reproduction in fourwing saltbrush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. Journal of Arid Environments. 36(2): 267-270. [42451]
  • 19. Belcher, Earl. 1985. Handbook on seeds of browse--shrubs and forbs. Technical Publication R8-TP8. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Region. 246 p. In cooperation with: Association of Official Seed Analysts. [43463]
  • 23. Blaisdell, James P.; Holmgren, Ralph C. 1984. Managing Intermountain rangelands--salt-desert shrub ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-163. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 52 p. [464]
  • 40. Chambers, Jeanne C. 2000. Seed movements and seedling fates in disturbed sagebrush steppe ecosystems: implications for restoration. Ecological Applications. 10(5): 1400-1413. [43356]
  • 41. Cibils, Andres F.; Swift, David M.; Hart, Richard H. 2000. Gender-related differences of shrubs in stands of Atriplex canescens with different histories of grazing by cattle. Journal of Arid Environments. 46: 383-396. [42409]
  • 43. Cibils, Andres F.; Swift, David M.; Hart, Richard H. 2003. Changes in shrub fecundity in fourwing saltbush browsed by cattle. Journal of Range Management. 56(1): 39-46. [45891]
  • 44. Cibils, Andres F.; Swift, David M.; McArthur, E. Durant. 1998. Plant-herbivore interactions in Atriplex: current state of knowledge. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-14. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 31 p. [29147]
  • 45. Clark, William R.; Medcraft, J. Richard. 1986. Wildlife use of shrubs on reclaimed surface-mined land in northeastern Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Management. 50(4): 714-718. [5288]
  • 47. Conrad, C. Eugene. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated ecosystems of southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 86 p. [4209]
  • 50. Darwin, Charles. 1893. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. New York: D. Appleton and Company. 352 p. [45816]
  • 57. Emmerich, F. L.; Tipton, F. H.; Young, J. A. 1993. Cheatgrass: changing perspectives and management strategies. Rangelands. 15(1): 37-40. [20463]
  • 64. Fort, Kevin P.; Richards, James H. 1998. Does seed dispersal limit initiation of primary succession in desert playas? American Journal of Botany. 85(12): 1722-1731. [30069]
  • 68. Freeman, D. C.; McArthur, E. D.; Harper, K. T. 1984. The adaptive significance of sexual lability in plants using Atriplex canescens as a principal example. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 71: 265-277. [6238]
  • 69. Freeman, D. Carl; McArthur, E. Durant; Sanderson, Stewart C.; Tiedemann, Arthur R. 1993. Influence of topography on cumulative pollen flow of fourwing saltbush. Res. Note INT-413. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 9 p. [22054]
  • 92. Hennessy, J. T.; Gibbens, R. P.; Cardenas, M. 1984. The effect of shade and planting depth on the emergence of fourwing saltbush. Journal of Range Management. 37(1): 22-24. [44076]
  • 93. Henrickson, James. 1974. Saline habitats and halophytic vegetation of the Chihuahuan Desert region. In: Wauer, Roland H.; Riskind, David H., eds. Transactions of the symposium on the biological resources of the Chihuahuan Desert region, United States and Mexico; 1974 October 17-18; Alpine, TX. Transactions and Proceedings Series No. 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service: 289-314. [16063]
  • 100. Hull, A. C., Jr. 1973. Germination of range plant seeds after long periods of uncontrolled storage. Journal of Range Management. 26(3): 198-200. [18728]
  • 101. Humphrey, Robert R. 1953. Forage production on Arizona ranges. III. Mohave County: A study in range condition. Bulletin 244. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station. 79 p. [4440]
  • 109. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2d ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 121. McArthur, E. Durant. 1977. Environmentally induced changes of sex expression in Atriplex canescens. Heredity. 38(1): 97-103. [44993]
  • 123. McArthur, E. Durant; Freeman, D. Carl; Luckinbill, Leo S.; Sanderson, Stewart C.; Noller, Gary L. 1992. Are trioecy and sexual lability in Atriplex canescens genetically based? Evidence from clonal studies. Evolution. 46(6): 1708-1721. [42450]
  • 129. Medina T., Jorge Galo; Garza C., Hector. 1987. Range seeding research in northern Mexico. In: Frasier, Gary W.; Evans, Raymond A., eds. Seed and seedbed ecology of rangeland plants: proceedings of symposium; 1987 April 21-23; Tucson, AZ. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service: 246-259. [3900]
  • 132. Monsen, Stephen B. 1994. Selection of plants for fire suppression on semiarid sites. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., compilers. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 363-373. [24310]
  • 136. Mozingo, Hugh N. 1987. Shrubs of the Great Basin: A natural history. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press. 342 p. [1702]
  • 139. Nord, Eamor C.; Van Atta, George R. 1960. Saponin--a seed germination inhibitor. Forest Science. 6(4): 350-353. [44994]
  • 150. Pendleton, B. K.; Freeman, D. C.; McArthur, E. D.; Pendleton, R. L. 1994. Growth, reproduction, and life history features of fourwing saltbush grown in a common garden. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., compilers. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 136-139. [24269]
  • 153. Pieper, Rex D.; Donart, Gary B. 1978. Response of fourwing saltbush to periods of protection. Journal of Range Management. 31(4): 314-315. [45836]
  • 176. Springfield, H. W. 1970. Germination and establishment of fourwing saltbush in the Southwest. Res. Pap. RM-55. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 48 p. [3315]
  • 184. Stutz, Howard C. 1978. Biogeography of saltbush Atriplex in Wyoming. In: Johnson, Kendall L., ed. Wyoming shrublands: Proceedings of the 7th Wyoming shrub ecology workshop; 1978 May 31 - June 1; Rock Springs, WY. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Range Management Division, Wyoming Shrub Ecology Workshop: 9-15. [2280]
  • 185. Stutz, Howard C. 1979. The meaning of "rare" and "endangered" in the evolution of western shrubs. In: Wood, Stephen L., ed. The endangered species: a symposium: Proceedings; 1978 December 7-8; Provo, UT. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Number 3. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University: 119-128. [3876]
  • 187. Stutz, Howard C. 1989. Evolution of shrubs. In: McKell, Cyrus M, ed. The biology and utilization of shrubs. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc: 323-340. [8038]
  • 188. Stutz, Howard C.; Carlson, J.R. 1985. Genetic improvement of saltbush (Atriplex) and other chenopods. In: Carlson, Jack R.; McArthur, E. Durant, chairmen. Range plant improvement in western North America: Proceedings of a symposium at the annual meeting of the Society for Range Management; 1985 February 14; Salt Lake City, UT. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management: 89-92. [2287]
  • 189. Stutz, Howard C.; Pope, C. Lorenzo; Leslie, Thomas. 1975. Germination studies in Atriplex. In: Stutz, Howard C., ed. Wildland Shrubs: Proceedings-- symposium and workshop: 1975 November 5-7; Provo, UT. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University: 150. [2289]
  • 208. Wasser, Clinton H. 1982. Ecology and culture of selected species useful in revegetating disturbed lands in the West. FWS/OBS-82/56. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 347 p. [4837]
  • 213. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 216. West, Neil E. 1994. Effects of fire on salt-desert shrub rangelands. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., compilers. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 71-74. [24256]
  • 124. McArthur, E. Durant; Sanderson, Stewart C. 1984. Distribution, systematics and evolution of Chenopodiaceae: an overview. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 14-24. [1577]
  • 130. Meyer, Susan E. 2003. Atriplex L. saltbush. In: Bonner, Franklin T., tech. coord. Woody plant seed manual, [Online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Producer). Available: http://wpsm.net/Genera.htm [2003, August 27]. [45116]
  • 134. Moore, T. Blaine; Stevens, Richard. 1984. Distribution and importance of the Atriplex case-bearing moth, Coleophora atriplicivora cockerel, on some chenopod shrubs, especially Atriplex canescens. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 220-225. [8024]
  • 140. Ogle, Daniel G.; St. John, Loren. 2003. Plant Guide: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45784]
  • 196. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2002. Plant Fact Sheet: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex Canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/factsheet/pdf/fs_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45785]
  • 207. Warren, Daniel C.; Kay, Burgess L. 1984. Pericarp inhibition of germination of Atriplex confertifolia. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 168-174. [2457]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Growth Form (according to Raunkiær Life-form classification)

More info on this topic.

More info for the term: phanerophyte

RAUNKIAER [156] LIFE FORM:
Phanerophyte
  • 156. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life Form

More info for the term: shrub

Shrub

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Broad-scale Impacts of Fire

Whisenant [217] found fourwing saltbush seedlings did not sprout after fire in southern Idaho. Sprouting ability of mature fourwing saltbush in the area is not documented.
  • 217. Whisenant, Steven G. 1987. [Personal communication]. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University, Department of Botany and Range Science. [46057]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Cyclicity

Phenology

More info on this topic.

Bud swell begins in early spring [206], with stem elongation resuming in mid- to late spring [140]. Seed germination occurs around the same time. Fourwing saltbush seeds outplanted along the Colorado River in Arizona germinated in March [6]. Flowering begins in mid- to late spring and may extend to early fall, depending upon latitude and elevation. Fruits and seeds mature 3 to 4 months after flowering: late summer (Aug.-Sept.) in the northern part of fourwing saltbush's range, and in fall and winter (Oct.-March) in the southern portion of its range [19,86,130,140,196]. Fruits are semipersistent, often remaining attached to the plant throughout winter. Fruits and seeds disperse as a unit in spring [135,196]. Phenological events reported by state are:

Area Leafs Flowers Fruits
California ---- May-Aug. [47,137] ----
Great Basin ---- May-mid-Aug. [86,136] fall [136]
Great Plains ---- May-Aug. July-Sept. [80,180]
Nevada late Feb.-April [1] Mar.-June [1,108] ----
Texas ---- April-Oct. [52] ----
  • 52. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 1. Ackerman, T. L.; Romney, E. M.; Wallace, A.; Kinnear, J. E. 1980. Phenology of desert shrubs in southern Nye County, Nevada. In: Nevada desert ecology. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs No. 4. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University: 4-23. [3197]
  • 6. Anderson, Bertin W.; Ohmart, Robert D.; Disano, John. 1979. Revegetating the riparian floodplain for wildlife. In: Johnson, R. Roy; McCormick, J. Frank, technical coordinators. Strategies for protection and management of floodplain wetlands and other riparian ecosystems: Proceedings of the symposium; 1978 December 11-13; Callaway Gardens, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-12. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 318-331. [4367]
  • 19. Belcher, Earl. 1985. Handbook on seeds of browse--shrubs and forbs. Technical Publication R8-TP8. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Region. 246 p. In cooperation with: Association of Official Seed Analysts. [43463]
  • 47. Conrad, C. Eugene. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated ecosystems of southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 86 p. [4209]
  • 80. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 86. Hanson, Craig A. 1962. Perennial Atriplex of Utah and the northern deserts. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 133 p. Thesis. [37191]
  • 135. Morris, Melvin S.; Schmautz, Jack E.; Stickney, Peter F. 1962. Winter field key to the native shrubs of Montana. Bulletin No. 23. Missoula, MT: Montana State University, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station. 70 p. [17063]
  • 136. Mozingo, Hugh N. 1987. Shrubs of the Great Basin: A natural history. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press. 342 p. [1702]
  • 137. Munz, Philip A. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
  • 180. Stephens, H. A. 1973. Woody plants of the North Central Plains. Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas. 530 p. [3804]
  • 206. Walser, R. H.; Weber, D. J.; McArthur, E. D.; Sanderson, S. C. 1990. Winter cold hardiness of seven wildland shrubs. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 115-118. [12843]
  • 108. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 3 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]
  • 130. Meyer, Susan E. 2003. Atriplex L. saltbush. In: Bonner, Franklin T., tech. coord. Woody plant seed manual, [Online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Producer). Available: http://wpsm.net/Genera.htm [2003, August 27]. [45116]
  • 140. Ogle, Daniel G.; St. John, Loren. 2003. Plant Guide: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45784]
  • 196. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2002. Plant Fact Sheet: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex Canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/factsheet/pdf/fs_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45785]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Atriplex canescens

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 0
Specimens with Barcodes: 3
Species With Barcodes: 1
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

National NatureServe Conservation Status

Canada

Rounded National Status Rank: NNR - Unranked

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: NNR - Unranked

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Atriplex canescens var. gigantea is on BLM's sensitive plant species list for Utah [197]. Populations are located on the Little Sahara National Recreation Area and are threatened by recreational vehicle use on the sand dunes [198].
  • 197. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Utah State Office. 2002. Sensitive plant species list for Utah. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah State Office. 3 p. [45787]
  • 198. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 1999. Rockwell Wilderness Study Area, [Online]. In: Utah Wilderness Inventory. Available: http://w3.access.gpo.gov/blm/utah/pdf/nw10.pdf [2003, November 24]. [45786]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Status

Consult the PLANTS Web site and your State Department of Natural Resources for this plant’s current status, such as state noxious status and wetland indicator values.

Public Domain

USDA NRCS Idaho State Office & Aberdeen Plant Materials Center

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Management considerations

More info for the terms: shrub, shrubs

Browsing effects:
Fourwing saltbush is adapted to browsing, and may show compensatory growth after
stem removal [104,180]. Old crown wood can produce vigorous sprouts
after new growth is browsed [23,45]; however, plants
declined when subjected to overuse (complete defoliation followed by 3
subsequent years of summer browsing) by domestic sheep and goats in Israel [20,33].
Pieper and Donart [153] found populations in south-central New Mexico suffered 25%
mortality under continuous cattle browsing. They concluded fourwing saltbush
populations do best when given year-long periodic respites from browsing.
Humphrey [102] provides a photographic guide to accessing condition of fourwing
saltbush/blue grama and other rangelands of northern Arizona.

Range productivity: There is considerable
interest in using fourwing saltbush to improve production on marginal rangelands
with very dry or saline soils [16,18,38,119].
As a result, fourwing saltbush is planted as forage on temperate and hot deserts throughout the world
[2,16,18].
Shrub die-off:
Great Basin shrubs are subject to periodic, massive die-offs, with fourwing
saltbush often showing greatest mortality among affected shrub species [89,205].
Many factors that probably act synergistically are implicated in fourwing
saltbush die-offs: increased soil salinity, high water table, and root
anaerobiosis associated with El Niños;
desert dodder (Cuscuta denticulata) infestation; fungal pathogens; and
insect herbivory [89,205,210]. A variety of insects including grasshoppers, bugs, Lepidoptera, and Hemiptera
feed on fourwing saltbush. Haws and others [89] identified insect herbivores on fourwing saltbush and
associated shadscale, winterfat, and antelope bitterbrush during the 1988-1989
shrub die-off.
  • 2. Al-Turki, T. A.; Omer, S.; Ghafoor, A. 2000. A synopsis of the genus Atriplex L. (Chenopodiaceae) in Saudi Arabia. Feddes Repertorium. 111(5-6): 261-293. [42301]
  • 16. Barson, M. M.; Abraham, B.; Malcolm, C. V. 1994. Improving the productivity of saline discharge areas: an assessment of the potential use of saltbrush in the Murray-Darling Basin. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 34(8): 1143-1154. [42487]
  • 20. Benjamin, R. W.; Lavie, Y.; Forti, M.; Barkai, D.; Yonatan, R.; Hefetz, Y. 1995. Annual regrowth and edible biomass of two species of Atriplex and of Cassia sturtii after browsing. Journal of Arid Environments. 29(1): 63-84. [42385]
  • 23. Blaisdell, James P.; Holmgren, Ralph C. 1984. Managing Intermountain rangelands--salt-desert shrub ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-163. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 52 p. [464]
  • 33. Buwai, M.; Trlica, M. J. 1977. Multiple defoliation effects on herbage yield, vigor, and total nonstructural carbohydrates of five range species. Journal of Range Management. 30(3): 164-171. [576]
  • 38. Cavazos Doria, J. Rafael; Aldon, Earl F. 1993. Fourwing saltbrush seedling survival using saline irrigation. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation. 7(3): 243-251. [42452]
  • 45. Clark, William R.; Medcraft, J. Richard. 1986. Wildlife use of shrubs on reclaimed surface-mined land in northeastern Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Management. 50(4): 714-718. [5288]
  • 102. Humphrey, Robert R. 1955. Forage production on Arizona ranges. IV. Coconino, Navajo, Apache counties: A study in range condition. Bulletin 266. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station. 84 p. [5087]
  • 153. Pieper, Rex D.; Donart, Gary B. 1978. Response of fourwing saltbush to periods of protection. Journal of Range Management. 31(4): 314-315. [45836]
  • 180. Stephens, H. A. 1973. Woody plants of the North Central Plains. Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas. 530 p. [3804]
  • 89. Haws, B. Austin; Bohart, George E.; Nelson, C. Riley; Nelson, David L. 1990. Insects and shrub dieoff in western states: 1986-89 survey results. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 127-151. [12845]
  • 104. Hunter, Richard B. 1987. Jackrabbit-shrub interactions in the Mojave Desert. In: Provenza, Frederick D.; Flinders, Jerran T.; McArthur, E. Durant, compilers. Proceedings--symposium on plant-herbivore interactions; 1985 August 7-9; Snowbird, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-222. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 88-92. [7402]
  • 119. Malcolm, C. V. 1989. Forage shrub production on salt-affected soils. In: McKell, Cyrus M, ed. The biology and utilization of shrubs. Chapter 27. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, INC: 553-574. [8050]
  • 205. Wallace, Arthur; Nelson, David L. 1990. Wildland shrub dieoffs following excessively wet periods: a synthesis. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 81-83. [12839]
  • 210. Weber, D. J.; Nelson, D. L.; Hess, W. M.; Bhat, R. B. 1990. Salinity and moisture stress in relation to dieoff of wildland shrubs. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 91-102. [12841]
  • 18. Belal, A. H.; Rammah, A. M.; Hopkin, M. S.; [and others]. 1993. Studies of salt-tolerance and chemical analysis of fodder shrubs in Egypt and Utah (USA). In: Towards the rational use of high salinity tolerant plants: Proceedings, 1st ASWAS conference; 1990 December 8-15; Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic: 213-220. [24669]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Cultivars, improved and selected materials (and area of origin)

Foundation and registered seed is available through the appropriate state Crop Improvement Association or commercial sources to grow certified seed.

'Marana' fourwing saltbush was released in 1979 by the NRCS Plant Materials Center in Lockford, California. It originated from plants near El Cajon, California and was selected for ease of establishment and drought resistance. It is best adapted to areas in the southwest including southern New Mexico, southern Arizona and southern to central California.

Rincon’ fourwing saltbush was selected by the Forest Service, Shrub Science Laboratory in Provo, Utah and cooperatively released with the NRCS Plant Materials Center, Meeker, Colorado in 1983. The original seed was collected at Rincon Blanco near Canjilon, Rio Arriba County, New Mexico at 7,800 feet elevation. Rincon is an erect, leafy form with early season green-up. It is best adapted to the southwest areas of central Utah, central Nevada, western Colorado, to central New Mexico and central Arizona.

Santa Rita’ fourwing saltbush was cooperatively released by the NRCS Plant Materials Center, Tucson, Arizona, ARS, and University of Arizona in 1987. It is best adapted to areas in the southwest including southern New Mexico, southern Arizona and southern to central California.

Snake River Plains Germplasm fourwing saltbush was selected by the NRCS Plant Materials Center, Aberdeen, Idaho and cooperatively released by the Aberdeen PMC, Pullman, Washington PMC and University of Idaho in 2001. Snake River Plains Germplasm is a composite of 4 accessions of fourwing saltbush collected from the Snake River Plains of southern Idaho. It was selected for superior establishment and cold hardiness. It is better adapted to the northern range of fourwing saltbush including southern Idaho, eastern Oregon, western Wyoming, northern Utah and northern Nevada than other fourwing saltbush releases.

Wytana’ fourwing saltbush was released by the NRCS Plant Materials Center, Bridger, Montana in 1976. Wytana is a natural cross between fourwing saltbush and Gardner or Nuttall saltbush. It is a short, herbaceous type that is best adapted to the Great Plains and mountain foothills of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming.

Public Domain

USDA NRCS Idaho State Office & Aberdeen Plant Materials Center

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Seed production

Establishing plants in a greenhouse and transplanting to the field will result in the most satisfactory stands for seed production. (Note: studies are underway to determine the feasibility or success of propagating fourwing saltbush from stem cuttings)

Plant spacing should be 6 to 8 feet within row and 8 to 10 feet between rows. Planting one male plant for every 5 female plants is recommended. Transplanting into weed barrier fabric can also improve plant establishment, seed production, weed control, and moisture conservation. Transplanting is recommended in the spring prior to summer heat. Full seed production is usually reached the third year following transplanting.

Plantings can also be established with seed. A minimum of 15 to 20 Pure Live seeds per linear foot of drill row should be planted. Hand seeding in late fall or very early spring may also be an option. Plant 5 to 10 seeds in a close group at desired spacing. Thin plants to desired spacing and ratio of male to female plants when fruiting starts (about 3 years). Full seed production may be reached the fourth year following direct seeding.

Fourwing saltbush requires an equivalent of 10 to 14 inches annual precipitation for seed production. Irrigation may only be needed for establishment and during drought years to ensure a seed crop. If irrigation is available, irrigate to promote vegetative growth. Make sure soil moisture is adequate at early flowering, during seed set and early maturation. Irrigate to field capacity prior to fall freeze-up. Expected seed yields may range from 200 to 400 pounds per acre. Fertilization is not generally recommended unless soil tests indicate severe nutrient deficiencies. Rabbits and rodents can damage stands and may destroy seedlings. Insects such as grasshoppers and Mormon crickets infrequently damage stands beyond recovery.

Seed generally ripens in late August and September and can be harvested from mid September through December. Harvesting seed is best accomplished for woody ecotypes by hand stripping. Mechanized harvesting has been used on Wytana, but seed requires additional conditioning to properly dry and clean out excessive trash (leaves, stems, other inert matter). Harvested seed is usually threshed (dewinged) by processing seed through a hammermill (1500 rpm) equipped with a ¼ inch screen and then running seed through a fanmill to the desired grade.

Dewinging may hasten after-ripening of seed resulting in shorter viability of seed. Seed can be stored and remain viable for 6 to 10 years. The dewinging process greatly enhances the ability of the seed to flow through planting equipment. Removing the hull that surrounds the embryo can injure the seed resulting in reduced viability, seedling vigor, and stand establishment. One must be extremely careful when threshing to limit the amount of mechanical action on the seed to minimize damage.

Fourwing saltbush seed requires about 10 month's after-ripening following harvest before accurate percent germination can be determined. Seeds per pound will vary by accession or ecotype, but averages 38,000 seeds per pound winged and 78,000 seeds per pound dewinged.

Public Domain

USDA NRCS Idaho State Office & Aberdeen Plant Materials Center

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Environmental concerns

Fourwing saltbush is native, long-lived, and spreads primarily by seed distribution. It is not considered "weedy", but could slowly spread into adjoining vegetative communities under ideal climatic and environmental conditions. This species is well documented as having beneficial qualities and no negative impacts on wild or domestic animals.

Public Domain

USDA NRCS Idaho State Office & Aberdeen Plant Materials Center

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Fourwing saltbush is palatable to cattle, sheep and deer season long. It provides nutritious winter browse on many areas and is a good fall and winter browse plant for bighorn sheep, antelope, and elk.

In new plantings, utilizing good seedbed and weed control techniques should enhance establishment and reduce competition with other plants. In interseedings plant competition should be reduced by chemical, scalping, furrowing or other techniques that help control existing vegetation and weeds. Animals utilizing the area should be removed from new plantings for at least two growing seasons or until plants are well established and reproducing. Irrigation may be needed for transplants on harsh sites to ensure establishment. Young seedings are not tolerant of excessive insect, rabbit, and rodent damage and plantings may require control measures if severe damage appears.

In established plantings, deferred rotation grazing systems are recommended for fourwing saltbush management. Plants can be grazed from late spring through winter, but plant health is best maintained if used primarily as a winter browse. Fourwing saltbush tolerates browsing very well, but will decrease in abundance under continuous close browsing. Proper use of fourwing saltbush as browse is approximately 40 - 50 percent of current year’s growth.

Excessive use results in damage or loss of plants from breakage of brittle branches. During dry periods, branches and stems may be brittle and trampling by livestock may damage plants. Damaged plants generally recover if rested, but production will be reduced until fully recovered. No injury to livestock results from grazing this plant. However, it can cause bloat and scours in spring if it is the primary dietary source. Rabbits, rodents, and grasshoppers utilize fourwing saltbush and may damage stands under severe conditions requiring pest control measures.

Public Domain

USDA NRCS Idaho State Office & Aberdeen Plant Materials Center

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems

Benefits

Value for rehabilitation of disturbed sites

More info for the terms: reclamation, restoration, shrub, shrubs

Fourwing saltbush is widely used in rangeland and riparian improvement and reclamation projects [3,4,6,35,130,140], including burned area recovery [7,46,146,170,178]. It is probably the most widely used shrub for restoration of winter ranges and mined land reclamation [25,130]. Fourwing saltbush is drought and cold resistant, palatable, relatively easy to establish with artificial regeneration, and establishes on harsh (and even toxic) sites. Fourwing saltbush is adaptable on sites with declining water tables, brackish groundwater, or saline soils [38]. The deep roots help stabilize erodible soils [4,108,109,140]. It can facilitate establishment of native shrubs, such as sagebrush, that are more resistant to artificial regeneration. Booth [25] warns against overseeding, which may exclude other desirable shrubs. Caution is also recommended when planting fourwing saltbush on roadways because it attracts large browsing ungulates [196].

Fourwing saltbush is propagated from seed or stem cuttings [130]. Information on seed collection and storage, nursery practices for starting seedlings and cuttings, and field outplanting techniques is available [4,118,122,130,140,152,171,181,203,208,209,226]. Fourwing saltbush is often included in native seed mixes [35,39]. Because it shows ecotypic variation, using local plant sources is recommended when possible [130]. Several cultivars have been developed for regional uses, and the seed is commercially available [35,195].

  • 6. Anderson, Bertin W.; Ohmart, Robert D.; Disano, John. 1979. Revegetating the riparian floodplain for wildlife. In: Johnson, R. Roy; McCormick, J. Frank, technical coordinators. Strategies for protection and management of floodplain wetlands and other riparian ecosystems: Proceedings of the symposium; 1978 December 11-13; Callaway Gardens, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-12. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 318-331. [4367]
  • 25. Booth, D. Terrance. 1985. The role of fourwing saltbush in mined land reclamation: a viewpoint. Journal of Range Management. 38(6): 562-565. [489]
  • 38. Cavazos Doria, J. Rafael; Aldon, Earl F. 1993. Fourwing saltbrush seedling survival using saline irrigation. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation. 7(3): 243-251. [42452]
  • 109. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2d ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 208. Wasser, Clinton H. 1982. Ecology and culture of selected species useful in revegetating disturbed lands in the West. FWS/OBS-82/56. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 347 p. [4837]
  • 7. Anon. 2000. Sagebrush steppe ecosystems symposium: Field tour summary. In: Entwistle, P. G.; DeBolt, A. M.; Kaltenecker, J. H.; Steenhof, K., compilers. In: Sagebrush steppe ecosystems symposium: Proceedings; 1999 June 21-23; Boise, ID. Publ. No. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150. Boise, ID: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Boise State Office: 123-124. [42737]
  • 35. Carlson, Jack. 1984. Atriplex cultivar development. In: Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 176-182. [603]
  • 39. Chadwick, James H.; Nelson, Deanna R.; Nunn, Carol R.; Tatman, Debra A. 1999. Thinning versus chaining: which costs more? In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Stevens, Richard, compilers. Proceedings: ecology and management of pinyon-juniper communities within the Interior West: Sustaining and restoring a diverse ecosystem; 1997 September 15-18; Provo, UT. Proceedings RMRS-P-9. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 290-292. [30569]
  • 146. Parker, Karl G. 1975. Some important Utah range plants. Extension Service Bulletin EC-383. Logan, UT: Utah State University. 174 p. [9878]
  • 152. Petersen, Joseph L.; Ueckert, Darrell N.; Wagner, Matthew W. 1990. Herbicides to aid establishment of fourwing saltbush. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 305-309. [12865]
  • 170. Shaw, Nancy L.; Haferkamp, Marshall R. 1990. Field establishment of spiny hopsage. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 193-199. [12851]
  • 178. Stanton, Frank. 1974. Wildlife guidelines for range fire rehabilitation. Tech. Note 6712. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 90 p. [2221]
  • 203. Vories, Kimery C. 1981. Growing Colorado plants from seed: a state of the art. Volume I: Shrubs. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-103. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 80 p. [3426]
  • 226. Yamashita, Irene S.; Manning, Sara J. 1995. Results of four revegetation treatments on barren farmland in the Owens Valley, California. In: Roundy, Bruce A.; McArthur, E. Durant; Haley, Jennifer S.; Mann, David K., compilers. Proceedings: wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium; 1993 October 19-21; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-315. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 142-147. [24840]
  • 3. Aldon, Earl F. 1984. Methods for establishing fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens [Pursh] Nutt.) on disturbed sites in the Southwest. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 265-268. [8029]
  • 4. Aldon, Earl F.; Cavazos Doria, J. Rafael. 1995. Growing and harvesting fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens [Pursh] Nutt.) under saline conditions. In: Roundy, Bruce A.; McArthur, E. Durant; Haley, Jennifer S.; Mann, David K., compilers. Proceedings: wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium; 1993 October 19-21; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-315. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 299-304. [24860]
  • 46. Clary, Warren P.; Tiedemann, Arthur R. 1984. Development of `Rincon' fourwing saltbush, winterfat, and other shrubs from seed following fire. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 273-280. [646]
  • 108. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 3 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]
  • 118. Luke, Forrest; Monsen, Stephen B. 1984. Methods and costs for establishing shrubs on mined lands in southwestern Wyoming. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 286-291. [1485]
  • 122. McArthur, E. Durant; Blauer, A. Clyde; Noller, Gary L. 1984. Propagation of fourwing saltbush by stem cuttings. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT- 172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 261-264. [1570]
  • 130. Meyer, Susan E. 2003. Atriplex L. saltbush. In: Bonner, Franklin T., tech. coord. Woody plant seed manual, [Online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Producer). Available: http://wpsm.net/Genera.htm [2003, August 27]. [45116]
  • 140. Ogle, Daniel G.; St. John, Loren. 2003. Plant Guide: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45784]
  • 171. Shaw, Nancy; Monsen, Stephen B. 1984. Nursery propagation and outplanting of bareroot chenopod seedlings. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 251-260. [2123]
  • 181. Stevens, Richard; Van Epps, Gordon A. 1984. Seeding techniques to improve establishment of forage kochia (Kochia prostrata [L.] Schrad.) and fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens [Pursh]. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 269-272. [8030]
  • 195. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Tucson Plant Materials Center. 2001. Commercial sources of conservation plant materials, [Online]. Available: http://plant-materials.nrcs.usda.gov/pubs/azpmsarseedlist0501.pdf [2003, August 25]. [44989]
  • 196. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2002. Plant Fact Sheet: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex Canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/factsheet/pdf/fs_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45785]
  • 209. Watson, M. Carolyn; Roundy, Bruce A.; Smith, Steven E.; [and others]. 1995. Water requirements for establishing native Atriplex species during summer in southern Arizona. In: Roundy, Bruce A.; McArthur, E. Durant; Haley, Jennifer S.; Mann, David K., compilers. Proceedings: wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium; 1993 October 19-21; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-315. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 119-125. [24836]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Importance to Livestock and Wildlife

More info for the terms: cover, restoration, shrub, shrubs

Fourwing saltbush provides valuable habitat and year-round browse for wildlife and livestock [83,101,108,130,136,213]. Its protein, fat, and carbohydrate levels are comparable to alfalfa (Medicago sativa) [37]. As an evergreen plant, it is especially valued in winter and during drought [84,111,130,136]. In southeastern Oregon, for example, mule deer preferred antelope bitterbrush over fourwing saltbush but browsed both. Fourwing saltbush showed better growth than antelope bitterbrush in drought years, providing more (and sometimes critical) forage [111]. Fourwing saltbush also provides browse and shelter for small mammals [73,83]. Additionally, the browse provides a source of water for black-tailed jackrabbits in arid environments [104]. Granivorous birds, including scaled and other quail species, grouse, and gray partridge, consume the fruits [140,154,196].

Palatability/nutritional value: Fourwing saltbush is 1 of the most palatable shrubs in the West [84]. It provides nutritious forage for all classes of livestock [26,101,154]. Wild and domestic ungulates, rodents, and lagomorphs readily consume all aboveground portions of the plant [95,104,136,180,230]. Palatability is rated good for deer, elk, pronghorn, bighorn sheep, domestic sheep, and domestic goats; fair for cattle; fair to good for horses in winter, and poor for horses in other seasons [53,162].

Shrub palatability varies within and among populations [143,184]. Within fourwing saltbush populations, plants with relatively high saponin content are least palatable [127]. Among populations, palatability tends to decrease with increasing ploidy levels [184]. Salt accumulated on leaf surfaces also decreases palatability; therefore, the physiological mechanism for salt tolerance tends to protect fourwing saltbush from overbrowsing during drought [25,77,208].

Browsers generally use fourwing saltbush most in fall and winter, when other green forage is scarce and protein, phosphorus, and energy content is high relative to associated shrubs and herbs [142,211]. In winter, fourwing saltbush browse is high in carotene, and leaves average about 18% total protein [140]. Nutritional variation in fourwing saltbush browse collected in the west-central Texas panhandle [72] and in central Utah [144] is given below. Data are means.

Texas site Crude protein (%) IVODM*  (%) Ca  (%) K (%) Mg  (%) Na  (%) P  (%)
Nov. 1985 18.9 (leaves) 66.2 1.6 2.3 1.0 2.7 0.19
8.4 (stems) 32.0 0.7 1.4 0.3 1.1 0.09
Feb. 1986 23.7 (leaves) 71.0 1.8 2.8 1.1 2.6 0.23
14.7 (stems) 45.4 1.2 2.2 0.5 1.4 0.16
May 1986 18.5 (leaves) 62.5 1.5 2.7 0.8 2.2 0.21
10.1 (stems) 36.9 1.1 2.4 0.4 1.3 0.10
Aug. 1986 11.6 (leaves) 61.7 1.3 2.5 0.7 2.7 0.18
4.6 (stems) 31.3 1.0 1.9 0.3 1.1 0.01
*In-vitro organic digestible matter

Utah site Crude protein (%) Digestible protein (%) Metabolic energy (Mcal/kg)
Sept. 14.5 7.9 ----
Oct. 16 8.9 ----
Nov. 15 8.2 ----
Dec. 14.6 8.1 ----
4-month mean ---- 8.24 1.42
Minimum requirement for pregnant ewe ---- 4.40 1.46

Mean nutritional composition (%) of fourwing saltbush grown on calcareous, saline soil in Egypt is given below [18]. Data are presented as an example of fourwing saltbush's high nutritional value on marginal lands.

Crude protein Crude fiber Ether extract Ash P Na K Ca Saponins
15.55 25.21 2.37 12.63* 0.04 2.39* 1.46 1.35 1.13
*Ash and sodium content were the lowest of 7 saltbush species planted.

Nutritional value varies among populations. In a common garden experiment in southern Idaho, Welch and Monsen [212] found significant (p=0.05) differences in winter protein levels, in-vitro digestibility, and productivity in fourwing saltbush accessions from Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona. Crude protein  ranged from 6.05 to 14.2%, in-vitro digestibility ranged from 29.1% to 46.9%, and productivity ranged from 6.95 oz/plant (197 g/plant) to 15.81 oz/plant (1,451 g/plant). There were no clear geographical patterns to the differences. Nutritional analysis has also been conducted for populations in the west-central panhandle of Texas [72].

Fruits and seeds are  highly nutritious and palatable. All classes of ungulates, and many bird and small mammal species, consume the utricles [162,196]. Fourwing saltbush seeds are commonly found in pocket mice and kangaroo rat scatterhoards near Reno, Nevada [117]. However, deer mice in western Nevada selected fourwing saltbush seed significantly less (p<0.1) than seed of associated species [58].

Fourwing saltbush is somewhat poisonous when consumed in large quantities without other forage, probably because of saponins in leaves and stems [84,108]. Cattle, particularly calves, feeding on little but fourwing saltbush may develop scours [47]. Angora goat yearlings fed only fourwing saltbush for 3 weeks lost weight (µ=2.5 lbs (1.1 kg)) [199]. As a component of a varied diet, fourwing saltbush is unlikely to have deleterious effects on livestock, especially after ruminal or cecal bacteria have adjusted to a saltbush diet [44].

Cover value: A variety of wildlife seek fourwing saltbush cover [136]. Coyote in southeastern Colorado preferentially seek fourwing saltbush/blue grama habitat along arroyos over open grassland [73]. Small mammals including common porcupine, ground squirrels, and lagomorphs use fourwing saltbush when resting and for shade [161,180,196]. Upland game birds (ring-necked pheasant, quail species, and gray partridge) use fourwing saltbush for thermal and roosting cover [172,196]. Fourwing saltbush cover in several states has been rated as follows [53]:

  CO MT UT WY
elk poor ---- fair poor
pronghorn ---- ---- poor poor
mule deer poor ---- fair poor
white-tailed deer ---- ---- ---- poor
small mammals fair fair good poor
small nongame birds ---- fair fair poor
upland game birds fair fair fair poor
waterfowl ---- ---- poor poor

Fourwing saltbush provides habitat and food for several at-risk species. For example, desert tortoises use fourwing saltbush habitats and browse its shubbery [125]. Mountain plover on the Pawnee National Grassland, Colorado, use fourwing saltbush/blue grama habitat for nesting [79]. Restoration ecologists planted fourwing saltbush, Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii), and red willow (Salix laevigata) on the Kern River Preserve, California, to improve habitat for the state-endangered yellow-billed cuckoo [5].

  • 25. Booth, D. Terrance. 1985. The role of fourwing saltbush in mined land reclamation: a viewpoint. Journal of Range Management. 38(6): 562-565. [489]
  • 44. Cibils, Andres F.; Swift, David M.; McArthur, E. Durant. 1998. Plant-herbivore interactions in Atriplex: current state of knowledge. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-14. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 31 p. [29147]
  • 47. Conrad, C. Eugene. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated ecosystems of southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 86 p. [4209]
  • 84. Hall, Harvey M.; Clements, Frederic E. 1923. The phylogenetic method in taxonomy: the North American species of Artemisia, Chrysothamnus, and Atriplex. Publication No. 326. Washington, DC: The Carnegie Institute of Washington. 355 p. [43183]
  • 101. Humphrey, Robert R. 1953. Forage production on Arizona ranges. III. Mohave County: A study in range condition. Bulletin 244. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station. 79 p. [4440]
  • 136. Mozingo, Hugh N. 1987. Shrubs of the Great Basin: A natural history. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press. 342 p. [1702]
  • 154. Powell, A. Michael. 1988. Trees & shrubs of Trans-Pecos Texas including Big Bend and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks. Big Bend National Park, TX: Big Bend Natural History Association. 536 p. [6130]
  • 180. Stephens, H. A. 1973. Woody plants of the North Central Plains. Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas. 530 p. [3804]
  • 184. Stutz, Howard C. 1978. Biogeography of saltbush Atriplex in Wyoming. In: Johnson, Kendall L., ed. Wyoming shrublands: Proceedings of the 7th Wyoming shrub ecology workshop; 1978 May 31 - June 1; Rock Springs, WY. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Range Management Division, Wyoming Shrub Ecology Workshop: 9-15. [2280]
  • 208. Wasser, Clinton H. 1982. Ecology and culture of selected species useful in revegetating disturbed lands in the West. FWS/OBS-82/56. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 347 p. [4837]
  • 211. Welch, Bruce L. 1989. Nutritive value of shrubs. In: McKell, Cyrus M., ed. The biology and utilization of shrubs. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc: 405-424. [8041]
  • 213. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 5. Anderson, Bertin W. 1988. Tree species micro-matched to soil to create riparian habitat for yellow-billed cuckoo (California). Restoration & Management Notes. 6(1): 39-40. [5416]
  • 37. Catlin, C. N. 1925. Composition of Arizona forages, with comparative data. Bull. 113. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station: 155-171. [4525]
  • 53. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
  • 58. Everett, Richard L.; Meeuwig, Richard O.; Stevens, Richard. 1978. Deer mouse preference for seed of commonly planted species, indigenous weed seed, and sacrifice foods. Journal of Range Management. 31(1): 70-73. [896]
  • 72. Garza, Andres, Jr.; Fulbright, Timothy E. 1988. Comparative chemical composition of armed saltbush and fourwing saltbush. Journal of Range Management. 41(5): 401-403. [5730]
  • 73. Gese, Eric M.; Rongstad, Orrin J.; Mytton, William R. 1988. Home range and habitat use of coyotes in southeastern Colorado. Journal of Wildlife Management. 52(4): 640-646. [6136]
  • 77. Goodin, J. R.; Mozafar, Ahmad. 1972. Physiology of salinity stress. In: McKell, Cyrus M.; Blaisdell, James P.; Goodin, Joe R., tech. eds. Wildland shrubs--their biology and utilization: An international symposium: Proceedings; 1971 July; Logan, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 255-259. [22761]
  • 79. Graul, Walter D.; Webster, Lois E. 1976. Breeding status of the mountain plover. The Condor. 78: 265-267. [25836]
  • 83. Hafner, Mark S. 1977. Density and diversity in Mojave Desert rodent and shrub communities. Journal of Animal Ecology. 46(3): 925-938. [42388]
  • 95. Hepworth, Bill. 1965. Investigation of pronghorn antelope in Wyoming. In: Proceedings of the 1st annual antelope states workshop; 1965 April 14-15; Santa Fe, NM. Santa Fe, NM: New Mexico Department of Fish and Game: 1-12. [25720]
  • 104. Hunter, Richard B. 1987. Jackrabbit-shrub interactions in the Mojave Desert. In: Provenza, Frederick D.; Flinders, Jerran T.; McArthur, E. Durant, compilers. Proceedings--symposium on plant-herbivore interactions; 1985 August 7-9; Snowbird, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-222. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 88-92. [7402]
  • 111. Kindschy, Robert R. 1996. Comparisons between fourwing saltbush and antelope bitterbrush in the northern Great Basin. Rangelands. 18(4): 153-154. [26884]
  • 117. Longland, William S.; Bateman, Sheryl L. 1998. Implications of desert rodent seed preferences for range remediation. Journal of Range Management. 51: 679-684. [42410]
  • 125. McArthur, E. Durant; Sanderson, Stewart C.; Webb, Bruce L. 1994. Nutritive quality and mineral content of potential desert tortoise food plants. Res. Pap. INT-473. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 26 p. [23185]
  • 127. McKell, Cyrus M. 1989. Shrub palatability. In: McKell, Cyrus M., ed. The biology and utilization of shrubs. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc: 267-281. [8035]
  • 143. Otsyina, Robert M. 1983. Evaluation of shrubs as native supplements to cured crested wheatgrass (Agropyron desertorum) pasture for sheep. Logan, UT: Utah State University. 117 p. Dissertation. [45516]
  • 144. Otsyina, Robert; McKell, C. M.; Van Epps, Gordon. 1982. Use of range shrubs to meet nutrient requirements of sheep grazing on crested wheatgrass during fall and early winter. Journal of Range Management. 35(6): 751-753. [45365]
  • 161. Ryder, Ronald A. 1980. Effects of grazing on bird habitats. In: DeGraff, Richard M., technical coordinator. Management of western forests and grasslands for nongame birds: Workshop proceedings; 1980 February 11-14; Salt Lake City, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-86. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 51-66. [17897]
  • 162. Sampson, Arthur W.; Jespersen, Beryl S. 1963. California range brushlands and browse plants. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, California Agricultural Experiment Station, Extension Service. 162 p. [3240]
  • 199. Ueckert, D. N.; Petersen, J. L.; Huston, J. E.; Wagner, M. W. 1990. Evaluation of fourwing saltbush as a forage for sheep and Angora goats. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 300-304. [12864]
  • 18. Belal, A. H.; Rammah, A. M.; Hopkin, M. S.; [and others]. 1993. Studies of salt-tolerance and chemical analysis of fodder shrubs in Egypt and Utah (USA). In: Towards the rational use of high salinity tolerant plants: Proceedings, 1st ASWAS conference; 1990 December 8-15; Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic: 213-220. [24669]
  • 26. Boutouba, A.; Holechek, J. L.; Galyean, M. L.; [and others]. 1990. Influence of two native shrubs on goat nitrogen status. Journal of Range Management. 43(6): 530-534. [35389]
  • 108. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 3 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]
  • 130. Meyer, Susan E. 2003. Atriplex L. saltbush. In: Bonner, Franklin T., tech. coord. Woody plant seed manual, [Online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Producer). Available: http://wpsm.net/Genera.htm [2003, August 27]. [45116]
  • 140. Ogle, Daniel G.; St. John, Loren. 2003. Plant Guide: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45784]
  • 142. Otsyina, R. M.; McKell, C. M.; Malecheck, J. M.; Van Epps, G. A. 1984. Potential of Atriplex and other chenopod shrubs for increasing range productivity and fall and winter grazing. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 215-219. [1805]
  • 172. Shaw, Nancy; Sands, Alan; Turnipseed, Dale. 1984. Potential use of fourwing saltbush and other dryland shrubs for upland game bird cover in southern Idaho. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 206-214. [2125]
  • 196. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2002. Plant Fact Sheet: Fourwing saltbush Atriplex Canescens (Pursh) Nutt, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Producer). Available: http://plants.usda.gov/factsheet/pdf/fs_atca2.pdf [2003, August 25]. [45785]
  • 212. Welch, Bruce L.; Monsen, Stephen B. 1984. Winter nutritive value of accessions of fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens [Pursh] Nutt.) grown in a uniform garden. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 138-144. [8027]
  • 230. Young, James A.; Kay, Burgess L.; Evans, Raymond A. 1984. Winter hardiness and jackrabbit preference in a hybrid population of fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens). In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard, C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 59-65. [2679]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Other uses and values

Traditional: Fourwing saltbush is traditionally important to Native Americans. They ground the seeds for flour [52,108]. The leaves, placed on coals, impart a salty flavor to corn and other roasted food [201]. Top-growth produces a yellow dye. Young leaves and shoots were used to dye wool and other materials [55,201]. Branch ashes were added to blue corn dough to make green bread [36]. The roots and flowers were ground to soothe insect bites [47,201]. Navajo used the roots to treat coughs and toothaches. Navajo and Seri used the seeds and leaves for an enemetic tea [60,201]. Native tribes throughout the Southwest favored fourwing saltbush as forage for their livestock [36,55].

Landscaping: Fourwing saltbush us widely cultivated as an ornamental [108,213], and is used in xeriscaping [179].

For biological control: In Iraq, seed extracts of fourwing saltbush produced significant mortality (p<0.01) in Culex mosquito larvae [145].

  • 52. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 47. Conrad, C. Eugene. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated ecosystems of southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 86 p. [4209]
  • 213. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 36. Castetter, Edward F. 1935. Ethnobiological studies in the American Southwest. Biological Series No. 4: Volume 1. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico. 62 p. [35938]
  • 55. Elmore, Francis H. 1944. Ethnobotany of the Navajo. Monograph Series: 1(7). Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico. 136 p. [35897]
  • 60. Felger, Richard S.; Moser, Mary Beck. 1974. Seri Indian pharmacopoeia. Economic Botany. 28: 414-436. [2767]
  • 145. Ouda, Nazar A.; Al-Chalabi, Badia'a M.; Al-Charchafchi, Fawzia M. R.; Mohsen, Zohair H. 1998. Insecticidal and ovicidal effects of the seed extract of Atriplex canescens against Culex quinquefasciatus. Pharmaceutical Biology. 36(1): 69-71. [42391]
  • 179. Stark, N. 1972. Low-maintenance landscaping. In: McKell, Cyrus M.; Blaisdell, James P.; Goodin, Joe R., tech. eds. Wildland shrubs--their biology and utilization: An international symposium: Proceedings; 1971 July; Logan, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 77-81. [22752]
  • 201. Vestal, Paul A. 1952. Ethnobotany of the Ramah Navaho. Reports of the Ramah Project: No. 4. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology: 40(4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. 94 p. [37064]
  • 108. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 3 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Uses

Rangeland/Grazing: fourwing saltbush is highly palatable browse for most livestock and big game. It is used primarily in the winter at which time it is high in carotene and averages about four percent digestible protein. The leaves may be as high as 18 percent total protein. It is grazed by all classes of livestock except horses.

Wildlife: fourwing saltbush provides excellent browse for deer season long. It is a good browse plant for bighorn sheep, antelope, and elk in fall and winter. It is also a food source and excellent cover for sharptail grouse, gray partridge (Huns), sage grouse, and other upland birds, rabbits, songbirds, and small mammals.

Erosion Control: fourwing saltbush makes excellent screens, hedges, and barriers. It is especially useful on saline-sodic soils. It has excellent drought tolerance. It has been planted in highway medians and on road shoulders, slopes, and other disturbed areas near roadways. Because it is a good wildlife browse species, caution is recommended in using it in plantings along roadways. Its extensive root system provides excellent erosion control.

Reclamation: fourwing saltbush is used extensively for reclamation of disturbed sites (mine lands, drill pads, exploration holes, etc,). It provides excellent species diversity for mine land reclamation projects.

Ethnobotanical: American Indians boiled fresh roots with a little salt and drank half-cupful doses for stomach pain and as a laxative. Roots were also ground and applied as a toothache remedy. Leaf or root tea was taken as an emetic for stomach pain and bad coughs. Soapy lather from leaves was used for itching and rashes from chickenpox or measles. Fresh leaf or a poultice of fresh or dried flowers was applied to ant bites. Leaves were used as a snuff for nasal problems. Smoke from burning leaves was used to revive someone who was injured, weak, or feeling faint. Hispanics use the plant for colds and flu.

Public Domain

USDA NRCS Idaho State Office & Aberdeen Plant Materials Center

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Atriplex canescens

Atriplex canescens, Chamiso, Chamiza, Four wing saltbush, Four-wing saltbush, and Fourwing saltbush, is a species of evergreen shrub in the Amaranthaceae family, which is native to the western and mid-western United States.

Description[edit]

Atriplex canescens has a highly variable form, and readily hybridizes with several other species in the Atriplex genus. The degree of polyploidy also results in variations in form. Its height can vary from 1 foot to 10 feet, but 2 to 4 feet is most common. The leaves are thin and 0.5 to 2 inches long.

It is most readily identified by its fruits, which have four wings at roughly 90 degree angles and are densely packed on long stems.

Dried fruits on a stem, in the desert west of Las Vegas, Nevada

Habitat[edit]

Fourwing saltbush is most common in early succession areas such as disturbed sites and active sand dunes. It is also found in more mature successions dominated by sagebrush—Artemisia tridentata and shadscale.

Uses[edit]

Among the Zuni people, an infusion of dried root and blossoms[1] or a poultice of blossoms is used for ant bites.[2] Twigs are also attached to prayer plumes and sacrificed to the cottontail rabbit to ensure good hunting.[3]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Stevenson, Matilda Coxe 1915 Ethnobotany of the Zuni Indians. SI-BAE Annual Report #30 (p.44)
  2. ^ Camazine, Scott and Robert A. Bye 1980 A Study Of The Medical Ethnobotany Of The Zuni Indians of New Mexico. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2:365–388 p.384
  3. ^ Stevenson, p.88
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Notes

Comments

This species forms hybrids with Atriplex confertifolia and A. gardneri varieties (see var. bonnevillensis). Materials from the vicinity of the type locality of the species in South Dakota are low subherbaceous plants that differ from our shrubby tall material. However, the type area is presently covered with water from a dam on the Missouri River, and it is not possible to exclude the possibility of A. canescens as it has been interpreted for the past century to have existed at that site during the Lewis and Clark Expedition, if that is indeed where the lectotype was collected. 

 Varieties 4 (4 in the flora): w North America, Mexico.

Nuttall’s new combination Atriplex canescens was based on Calligonum canescens Pursh. Watson based his new name A. nuttallii directly on A. canescens Nuttall, i.e., including the citation of Nuttall’s "Genera, 1. 197," and on its basionym, C. canescens. The name A. nuttallii is thus a nomenclatural synonym of A. canescens and was thus illegitimate at its inception. It cannot be resurrected by even the most sophisticated arguments. A sheet of Atriplex canescens, noted as "a shrub," taken by Nuttall on the 1810 Missouri River expedition is extant in the Lambert herbarium (PH). It bears several, obviously shrubby, staminate flowering branches, but the only pistillate branch is very immature. The name A. gardneri, also cited provisionally by Watson within the concept of A. nuttallii, clearly has priority over other names for that widely distributed species complex. Attempts at leptotypification of the name nuttallii by J. McNeill et al. (1983) and H. C. Stutz and S. C. Sanderson (1998) are both superfluous, the name being illegitimate.

C. A. Hanson (1962) noted the similarity between the occasional wingless fruiting bracteoles of Atriplex canescens and A. gardneri var. falcata. He noted further that the bracts of both species lack lateral teeth subtending the terminal ones, have terminal teeth united half their length, and have indurate bracts. Whether such similarity indicates relationship or mere coincidence is open to question. However, A. canescens is known to form hybrids with most, if not all, portions of the gardneri complex and with other woody species whose range it overlaps as well.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments

Reported as introduced, at Mastung, Quetta etc. to test it as a new fodder plant, (Stewart, 1.c.). Sometimes a few male flowers (functional or not) also develop at the base of female flowers.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

More info for the term: introgression

The scientific name of fourwing saltbush is Atriplex canescens (Pursh.) Nutt.
(Chenopodiaceae) [52,80,97,98,107,109,213].
Varieties are as follows:

Atriplex canescens var. angustifolia (Torr.) Wats. [107]

Atriplex canescens var. canescens [98,107]

Atriplex canescens var. gigantea Welsh & Stutz [107,213

Atriplex canescens var. laciniata Parish [107]

Atriplex canescens var. linearis (S. Wats.) Munz [107,137]

Atriplex canescens var. macilenta Jepson [107]

Ploidy levels within fourwing saltbush range from 2n to 12n and form a partial basis for
segregation of infrataxa [163,184] .
The infrataxa are interfertile [97]. Morphological overlap occurs among the
varieties [84], and geographic distributions
of the varieties overlap in the Southwest and California [107]. Some authorities do not recognize
fourwing saltbush infrataxa [106].

Hybrids: North American saltbushes (Atriplex spp.) are evolving rapidly.
Hybridization, polyploidy, and introgression are common
mechanisms of evolution within the genus [86,124,136,186].
Fourwing saltbush hybridizes more often than
any other saltbush. Even nonwoody
saltbush species may cross with fourwing saltbush and produce fertile offspring [24,86,186]
in the Great Basin [186]. Common fourwing
saltbush crosses are with New Mexico saltbush (A. obovata)
and sickle saltbush (A. falcata) [86,108,174,186]. Several hybrids are described as distinct, established taxa
[86,107,186,213]:

Atriplex × aptera Nels., moundscale (fourwing × Nuttall's saltbush (A. nuttallii))

Atriplex bonnevillensis Hanson, Bonneville saltbush (fourwing ×
sickle saltbush on the Lake Bonneville lakebed)

Atriplex laciniata L., frosted orache (fourwing × cattle
saltbush (A. polycarpa))

Atriplex × odontoptera Rydb. (fourwing × Gardner's saltbush (A. gardneri))

Other important fourwing saltbush hybrids form swarms. Although common, some of
these hybrids are too genetically flexible to be considered distinct taxa.
Others are waiting nomenclatural designation. They include [86,186]:

fourwing saltbush × armed saltbush (A. acanthocarpa)

fourwing saltbush × shadscale (A. confertifolia)

fourwing saltbush × basin saltbush (A. tridentata)
  • 52. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 80. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 84. Hall, Harvey M.; Clements, Frederic E. 1923. The phylogenetic method in taxonomy: the North American species of Artemisia, Chrysothamnus, and Atriplex. Publication No. 326. Washington, DC: The Carnegie Institute of Washington. 355 p. [43183]
  • 86. Hanson, Craig A. 1962. Perennial Atriplex of Utah and the northern deserts. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 133 p. Thesis. [37191]
  • 97. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 98. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
  • 109. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2d ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 136. Mozingo, Hugh N. 1987. Shrubs of the Great Basin: A natural history. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press. 342 p. [1702]
  • 137. Munz, Philip A. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
  • 163. Sanderson, Stewart C.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C. 1989. A relationship between polyploidy and habitat in western shrub species. In: Wallace, Arthur; McArthur, E. Durant; Haferkamp, Marshall R., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on shrub ecophysiology and biotechnology; 1987 June 30 - July 2; Logan, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-256. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 23-30. [5919]
  • 184. Stutz, Howard C. 1978. Biogeography of saltbush Atriplex in Wyoming. In: Johnson, Kendall L., ed. Wyoming shrublands: Proceedings of the 7th Wyoming shrub ecology workshop; 1978 May 31 - June 1; Rock Springs, WY. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Range Management Division, Wyoming Shrub Ecology Workshop: 9-15. [2280]
  • 213. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 106. Jones, Stanley D.; Wipff, Joseph K.; Montgomery, Paul M. 1997. Vascular plants of Texas. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 404 p. [28762]
  • 174. Smith, Bruce N.; Lytle, C. Mel; Hansen, Lee D. 1995. Predicting plant growth rates from dark respiration rates: an experimental approach. In: Roundy, Bruce A.; McArthur, E. Durant; Haley, Jennifer S.; Mann, David K., compilers. Proceedings: wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium; 1993 October 19-21; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-315. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 243-245. [24855]
  • 24. Blauer, A. Clyde; Plummer, A. Perry; McArthur, E. Durant; [and others]. 1976. Characteristics and hybridization of important Intermountain shrubs. II. Chenopod family. Res. Pap. INT-177. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 49 p. [473]
  • 107. Kartesz, John T.; Meacham, Christopher A. 1999. Synthesis of the North American flora (Windows Version 1.0), [CD-ROM]. Available: North Carolina Botanical Garden. In cooperation with the Nature Conservancy, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [2001, January 16]. [36715]
  • 108. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 3 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]
  • 124. McArthur, E. Durant; Sanderson, Stewart C. 1984. Distribution, systematics and evolution of Chenopodiaceae: an overview. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 14-24. [1577]
  • 186. Stutz, Howard C. 1984. Atriplex hybridization in western North America. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Stutz, Howard C.; [and others], compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods; 1983 May 2-6; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-172. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 25-27. [2284]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Synonyms

Atriplex canescens var. aptera (Nels.) Hitchc. [88,98]

     = Atriplex ×
aptera Nels. [107]

Atriplex canescens ssp. canescens [97]

     = Atriplex canescens var. canescens [98,107]

Atriplex canescens ssp. linearis (S. Wats.) Hall & Clements [84,97]

     = Atriplex canescens var. linearis (S. Wats.) Munz [107]

Atriplex canescens var. occidentalis (Torr. & Frem.) Welsh & Stutz [213]

     = Atriplex canescens var. canescens [107]
  • 84. Hall, Harvey M.; Clements, Frederic E. 1923. The phylogenetic method in taxonomy: the North American species of Artemisia, Chrysothamnus, and Atriplex. Publication No. 326. Washington, DC: The Carnegie Institute of Washington. 355 p. [43183]
  • 88. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2d ed. Chicago: The Swallow Press, Inc. 666 p. [6851]
  • 97. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 98. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
  • 213. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 107. Kartesz, John T.; Meacham, Christopher A. 1999. Synthesis of the North American flora (Windows Version 1.0), [CD-ROM]. Available: North Carolina Botanical Garden. In cooperation with the Nature Conservancy, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [2001, January 16]. [36715]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Common Names

fourwing saltbush

four-wing saltbush

chamiso

chamiza

thinleaf fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens var. linearis)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!