Articles on this page are available in 2 other languages: Spanish (1), Dutch (1) (learn more)

Overview

Brief Summary

Common mullein is a notable plant with its yellow flowers and single long sturdy stem reaching heights up to two meters. The plant has many uses and many nicknames. For example, Hig candlewick and Cowboy toilet paper! It was used long ago as a torch by dipping it in tar or wax. And presumably cowboys used it as toilet paper! Not just people find it a handy plant. Some birds, including the wheatear, whinchat and stonechat, use common mullein as a lookout post. In the winter, linnets and tits eat its fruit capsules filled with nutritious seeds. Common mullein flowers open before dawn and close in the afternoon. The seeds can wait in the ground up to decades before germinating.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Copyright Ecomare

Source: Ecomare

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

History in the United States

Common mullein is a monocarpic perennial (i.e., takes two or more years to flower and die). Brought over from Europe by settlers, it was used as a medicinal herb, as a remedy for coughs and diarrhea and a respiratory stimulant for the lungs when smoked. A methanol extract from common mullein has been used as an insecticide for mosquito larvae.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

U.S. National Park Service Weeds Gone Wild website

Source: U.S. National Park Service

Trusted

Article rating from 1 person

Average rating: 1.0 of 5

Comprehensive Description

Miscellaneous Details

"Notes: Western Ghats, Cultivated / Escape, Native of Mediterranean Region"
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© India Biodiversity Portal

Source: India Biodiversity Portal

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Brief

Flowering class: Dicot Habit: Herb
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© India Biodiversity Portal

Source: India Biodiversity Portal

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments

Great Mullein is an imposing plant with interesting foliage and form. The flowers seem small and inconspicuous in comparison with the rest of the plant. This is an easy plant to identify, although there are other Verbascum spp. (Mulleins) in the Old World that have a similar appearance. Of these, only Verbascum phlomoides (Orange Mullein) is known to occur in Illinois, although it is rare within the state. This latter species has larger flowers (at least 1" across) that range in color from pale yellow to orange-yellow. While Great Mullein has dense spikes of flowers, the flowering spikes of Orange Mullein are more interrupted and less dense. The leaves of Orange Mullein are less hairy and more green on the upper surface, and its upper leaves are only slightly decurrent against the stem. There are other introduced Mulleins, but they are smaller and less hairy plants that produce panicles or racemes of flowers, rather than spikes. At one time, the dried stalks of Great Mullein were dipped in wax or tallow and used as torches.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© John Hilty

Source: Illinois Wildflowers

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Description

During the 1st year, this adventive or introduced biennial plant consists of a rosette of basal leaves about 1-2' across. During the 2nd year, it becomes 3-7' tall and is usually unbranched. Occasionally, one or two side stems may develop in the upper half of the plant. These stems are covered with downy white hairs. The alternate leaves are up to 12" long and 4" across, becoming progressively smaller and more narrow as they ascend the central stem. They are obovate or oblong-ovate, smooth or slightly crenate along the margins (which are sometimes wavy), and covered with fine downy hairs. The lower leaves taper gradually to a narrow winged base, while the upper leaves are partially decurrent against the stem. The dense branched hairs provide the foliage with a color that is whitish or greyish green. The central stem terminates in a dense spike of flowers about ½–2' long. Each flower is about ¾" across and consists of 5 pale yellow petals, 5 hairy green sepals, 5 stamens, and a pistil. The 3 upper stamens are covered with white or yellow hairs, while the 2 lower stamens are hairless. The blooming period usually occurs during the summer and lasts about 1½ months. Only a few flowers are in bloom at the same time. Each flower is replaced by a seed capsule with 2 cells, each cell containing numerous little seeds. The rectangular-oblong seeds have fine wavy ridges and tiny pits across the surface. While the foliage withers away, the central stalk and its seed capsules turn brown and persist through the winter. The seeds are small enough to be carried aloft by the gusts of wind that shake the central stalk. The root system consists of a stout taproot that runs deep into the ground. This plant spreads by reseeding itself. Cultivation
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© John Hilty

Source: Illinois Wildflowers

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

General Description

Biennials to 1.5 m tall, densely with grayish yellow stellate hairs. Basal and lower stem leaves petiolate; leaf blade oblanceolate-oblong, to 15 cm long, 6 cm wide, margin crenate. Other stem leaves gradually decreasing in size upward, sessile, oblong to ovate-oblong, base decurrent into wings. Spicate panicle cylindric, to 30 cm long, 2 cm wide, dense. Flowers usually few fascicled. Pedicel short. Calyx ca. 7 mm; lobes lanceolate. Corolla yellow, 1-2 cm in diameter. Stamens 5; filaments of anterior 2 stamens glabrous and of posterior 3 pubescent; anther lobes divergent at base. Capsule ovoid, as long as persistent calyx.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Wen, Jun

Source: Plants of Tibet

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution

"Tamil Nadu: Dindigul, Nilgiri"
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© India Biodiversity Portal

Source: India Biodiversity Portal

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

"
Global Distribution

Native of Europe, northern Africa and Asia

Indian distribution

State - Kerala, District/s: Idukki

"
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© India Biodiversity Portal

Source: India Biodiversity Portal

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

More info for the terms: nonnative species, succession

Common mullein is a nonnative species that occurs throughout most of North America. In Canada, common mullein is found in all southern provinces. In the United States, common mullein occurs in all states including Alaska and Hawaii [7,104,113,139]. Within the contiguous United States, common mullein is often described as common, widespread, conspicuous, or everywhere [36,41,47,66,92,106,130,143,147]. Plants Database provides a map of common mullein's North American distribution.

In much of the United States, common mullein is considered adventive or naturalized [47,96,97,144]. Common mullein was likely introduced to the eastern United States more than 230 years ago. Before the Revolutionary War, common mullein seeds were brought and cultivated by early settlers for the easy collection of fish [148]. It is likely other initial introductions occurred as well, and given the many uses of common mullein, it was likely transported and cultivated by US settlers and tribes. For more on the use of common mullein by early European settlers and Native Americans, see Other Uses.

While the method and speed of common mullein's spread across the United States is not well known, it was noted as a common weed in Boulder County, Colorado, in 1905 [154] and was observed in Mount Rainier National Park, Washington, in 1932 [124]. Introduction(s) into Alaska may have been more recent, as common mullein was not recorded in the state's flora published in 1968 [61]. Common mullein was first reported in Hawaii in 1932, and as of 1990, it occupied an area greater than 770 mile² (2,000 km²) [31].

In most places, common mullein is limited to disturbed areas and rarely persists beyond the earliest stages of succession. A 2004 report from the Forest Service's Eastern Region lists common mullein as a widespread nonnative species typically restricted to disturbed areas and not particularly invasive in undisturbed habitats [138]. However, persistent and unusually dense populations are reported in some Hawaii [33] and California [16] habitats. Potential effects of common mullein's persistence in these areas are addressed in Impacts and Control.

  • 97. Munz, Philip A.; Keck, David D. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
  • 147. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 47. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 7. Ansari, Shahin. 2007. Life history variation, population dynamics, and impact of the introduced weed mullein (Verbascum thapsus) on the island of Hawai'i. Manoa, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa. 292 p. Dissertation. [69409]
  • 16. Bossard, Carla C.; Randall, John M.; Hoshovsky, Marc C., eds. 2000. Invasive plants of California's wildlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 360 p. [38054]
  • 31. Cuddihy, Linda W.; Stone, Charles P. 1990. Alteration of native Hawaiian vegetation: Effects of humans, their activities and introductions. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit. 138 p. [40613]
  • 33. Daehler, Curtis C. 2005. Upper-montane plant invasions in the Hawaiian Islands: patterns and opportunities. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 7(3): 203-216. [69378]
  • 36. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany, No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 41. Duncan, Wilbur H.; Duncan, Marion B. 1987. The Smithsonian guide to seaside plants of the Gulf and Atlantic coasts from Louisiana to Massachusetts, exclusive of lower peninsular Florida. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. 409 p. [12906]
  • 61. Hulten, Eric. 1968. Flora of Alaska and neighboring territories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1008 p. [13403]
  • 92. Martin, William C.; Hutchins, Charles R. 1981. A flora of New Mexico. Volume 2. Germany: J. Cramer. 2589 p. [37176]
  • 104. Pojar, Jim; MacKinnon, Andy, eds. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest coast: Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska. Redmond, WA: Lone Pine Publishing. 526 p. [25159]
  • 106. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606]
  • 113. Roland, A. E.; Smith, E. C. 1969. The flora of Nova Scotia. Halifax, NS: Nova Scotia Museum. 746 p. [13158]
  • 124. St. John, Harold; Warren, Fred A. 1937. The plants of Mount Rainier National Park, Washington. The American Midland Naturalist. 18(6): 952-985. [62707]
  • 130. Strausbaugh, P. D.; Core, Earl L. 1977. Flora of West Virginia. 2nd ed. Morgantown, WV: Seneca Books, Inc. 1079 p. [23213]
  • 143. Voss, Edward G. 1996. Michigan flora. Part III: Dicots (Pyrolaceae--Compositae). Bulletin 61: Cranbrook Institute of Science; University of Michigan Herbarium. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan. 622 p. [30401]
  • 144. Wagner, Warren L.; Herbst, Derral R.; Sohmer, S. H., eds. 1999. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai'i, Revised edition. Volume 2. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press. 989-1918. [70168]
  • 148. Wilhelm, Gene, Jr. 1974. The mullein: plant piscicide of the mountain folk culture. The Geographical Review. 64: 235-252. [70320]
  • 154. Young, Robert T. 1907. The forest formations of Boulder County, Colorado. Botanical Gazette. 44(5): 321-352. [64439]
  • 96. Mohlenbrock, Robert H. 1986. [Revised edition]. Guide to the vascular flora of Illinois. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 507 p. [17383]
  • 66. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 2 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]
  • 138. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Eastern Region. 2004. Eastern Region invasive plants ranked by degree of invasiveness, [Online]. In: Noxious weeds and non-native invasive plants. Section 3: Invasive plants. Milwaukee, WI: Eastern Region (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/wildlife/range/weed/Sec3B.htm [2004, February 16]. [46748]
  • 139. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2008. PLANTS Database, [Online]. Available: http://plants.usda.gov/. [34262]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Range and Habitat in Illinois

Great Mullein is a common plant that occurs in all counties of Illinois (see Distribution Map). It is native to Eurasia, and may have been introduced into the United States as an herbal or ornamental plant. Habitats include limestone glades, rocky slopes and clay banks, pastures and fallow fields, areas along railroads and roadsides, vacant lots, and dry waste areas. Disturbed areas are preferred.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© John Hilty

Source: Illinois Wildflowers

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution in the United States

Common mullein was first introduced into the U.S. in the mid-1700's, where it was used as a piscicide, or fish poison, in Virginia. It quickly spread throughout the U.S. and is well established throughout the eastern states. Records show that it was first described in Michigan in 1839 and on the Pacific coast in 1876, probably due to multiple introductions as a medicinal herb.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

U.S. National Park Service Weeds Gone Wild website

Source: U.S. National Park Service

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Native Range

Europe and Asia 
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

U.S. National Park Service Weeds Gone Wild website

Source: U.S. National Park Service

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Localities documented in Tropicos sources

Verbascum thapsus L.:
Argentina (South America)
Canada (North America)
Chile (South America)
United States (North America)
China (Asia)

Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Jiangsu, Sichuan, Xinjiang, Xizang, Yunnan, Zhejiang [Asia and Europe, naturalized throughout the Northern Hemisphere].
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Verbascum thapsus is occurring in Jiangsu, Sichuan, Xinjiang, Xizang, Yunnan, Zhejiang of China, Asia and Europe, naturalized throughout the Northern Hemisphere.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Wen, Jun

Source: Plants of Tibet

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National Distribution

Canada

Origin: Exotic

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Unknown/Undetermined

Confidence: Confident

United States

Origin: Exotic

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Unknown/Undetermined

Confidence: Confident

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Himalaya (Kashmir to Bhutan), Tibet, W. & C. China.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Morphology

Description

More info for the term: frequency

This description provides characteristics that may be relevant to fire ecology and is not meant for identification. Keys for identification are available (e.g., [41,45,47,58,143,144,147]).

Aboveground characteristics: Common mullein is a densely woolly, sturdy biennial that may reach more than 7 feet (2 m) tall in its flowering year [36,66,113,144]. Annual and triennial forms occasionally occur [110]. A basal rosette of large furry leaves and a substantial crown are produced in the first year [10]. In the second year, common mullein typically produces a single, stout (>1 cm thick), erect flowering stem. One or more erect branches near the base of the inflorescence are normal [56,104,131]. Basal leaves are simple, measure 3 to 20 inches (8-50 cm) long, and may be persistent. Stem leaves are alternate, and their size is reduced toward the inflorescence [30,104,144]. The thick coating of branched hairs on the stems and leaves breaks the force of surface winds and prevents water loss to evaporation [10].

Common mullein flowers are densely arranged on a spike-like, terminal inflorescence [59,78,106]. Flowers are short-lived. They are open to pollination for 1 day from just before dawn to midafternoon (Thompson, personal communication, cited in [52]). Branching of the inflorescence can occur with herbivory or clipping damage [87,89], and duration of flowering is a function of flowering stalk length. Long stalks may flower late into the growing season [52]. Fasciation or unregulated tissue growth that forms a large, bulbous inflorescence occurs often in Hawaiian common mullein populations. The frequency of fasciated flowers ranges from 0% to 45%, and fasciated plants have occurred on the Island for 50 years or more [7,33]. This phenomenon is discussed more in Seed production and Impacts and Control.

Fasciated inflorescence
© Gerald D. Carr

Common mullein produces hairy, egg-shaped, two-celled capsules. Capsules are 6 to 10 mm long, split at maturity, and contain numerous seeds. Seeds are small, 0.4 to 0.8 mm long, and average 0.064 mg. Seeds are wingless and not adapted for long-distance dispersal [52,53,56,58,97,104,144]. The rod-like spike of fruits often persists through the winter [143].

Belowground characteristics: Thick, deep taproots with fibrous lateral roots are produced in the first year of rosette growth. Root growth nearly stops when common mullein bolts (Reinartz, unpublished data, cited in [111]), [10,104,144]. As of this writing (2008), no excavation studies reported taproot size or rooting depth. A study by Reinartz [111], however, suggests that root size and rooting depth may vary by site. When common mullein plants from seed collected at increasing latitudes were grown in a common garden, plants from southern seed sources (Texas or Georgia) had a significantly (P<0.01) greater proportion of root biomass than plants from seed collected in North Carolina or southern Canada.

  • 78. Lackschewitz, Klaus. 1991. Vascular plants of west-central Montana--identification guidebook. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-227. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 648 p. [13798]
  • 10. Bare, Janet E. 1979. Wildflowers and weeds of Kansas. Lawrence, KS: The Regents Press of Kansas. 509 p. [3801]
  • 45. Gleason, Henry A.; Cronquist, Arthur. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York: New York Botanical Garden. 910 p. [20329]
  • 97. Munz, Philip A.; Keck, David D. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
  • 147. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 47. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 7. Ansari, Shahin. 2007. Life history variation, population dynamics, and impact of the introduced weed mullein (Verbascum thapsus) on the island of Hawai'i. Manoa, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa. 292 p. Dissertation. [69409]
  • 30. Cronquist, Arthur; Holmgren, Arthur H.; Holmgren, Noel H.; Reveal, James L.; Holmgren, Patricia K. 1984. Intermountain flora: Vascular plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. 4: Subclass Asteridae, (except Asteraceae). New York: The New York Botanical Garden. 573 p. [718]
  • 33. Daehler, Curtis C. 2005. Upper-montane plant invasions in the Hawaiian Islands: patterns and opportunities. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 7(3): 203-216. [69378]
  • 36. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany, No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 41. Duncan, Wilbur H.; Duncan, Marion B. 1987. The Smithsonian guide to seaside plants of the Gulf and Atlantic coasts from Louisiana to Massachusetts, exclusive of lower peninsular Florida. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. 409 p. [12906]
  • 52. Gross, Katherine L.; Werner, Patricia A. 1978. Biology of Canadian Weeds. 28. Verbascum thapsus L. and Verbascum blattaria L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 58(2): 401-413. [69386]
  • 53. Gross, Katherine L.; Werner, Patricia A. 1982. Colonizing abilities of "biennial" plant species in relation to ground cover: implications for their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology. 63(4): 921-931. [12143]
  • 56. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: The Swallow Press, Inc. 666 p. [6851]
  • 58. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 59. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
  • 87. Lortie, Christopher J.; Aarssen, Lonnie W. 1997. Apical dominance as an adaptation in Verbascum thapsus: effects of water and nutrients on branching. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 158(4): 461-464. [69368]
  • 89. Lortie, Christopher J.; Aarssen, Lonnie W. 2000. A test of the reserve meristem hypothesis using Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany. 87(12): 1789-1792. [69389]
  • 104. Pojar, Jim; MacKinnon, Andy, eds. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest coast: Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska. Redmond, WA: Lone Pine Publishing. 526 p. [25159]
  • 106. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606]
  • 110. Reinartz, James A. 1984. Life history variation of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus) I. Latitudinal differences in population dynamics and timing of reproduction. Journal of Ecology. 72(3): 897-912. [69394]
  • 111. Reinartz, James A. 1984. Life history variation of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus) II. Plant size, biomass partitioning and morphology. Journal of Ecology. 72(3): 913-925. [69395]
  • 113. Roland, A. E.; Smith, E. C. 1969. The flora of Nova Scotia. Halifax, NS: Nova Scotia Museum. 746 p. [13158]
  • 131. Stubbendieck, James; Coffin, Mitchell J.; Landholt, L. M. 2003. Weeds of the Great Plains. 3rd ed. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry. 605 p. In cooperation with: University of Nebraska, Lincoln. [50776]
  • 143. Voss, Edward G. 1996. Michigan flora. Part III: Dicots (Pyrolaceae--Compositae). Bulletin 61: Cranbrook Institute of Science; University of Michigan Herbarium. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan. 622 p. [30401]
  • 144. Wagner, Warren L.; Herbst, Derral R.; Sohmer, S. H., eds. 1999. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai'i, Revised edition. Volume 2. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press. 989-1918. [70168]
  • 66. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 2 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Description

Common mullein, also known as wooly mullein, is an erect herb. First year mullein plants are low-growing rosettes of bluish gray-green, feltlike leaves that range from 4-12 inches in length and 1-5 inches in width. Mature flowering plants are produced the second year, and grow to 5 to 10 feet in height, including the conspicuous flowering stalk. The five-petaled yellow flowers are arranged in a leafy spike and bloom a few at a time from June-August. Leaves alternate along the flowering stalks and are much larger toward the base of the plant. The tiny seeds are pitted and rough with wavy ridges and deep grooves and can germinate after lying dormant in the soil for several decades.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

U.S. National Park Service Weeds Gone Wild website

Source: U.S. National Park Service

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Elevation Range

1800-4000 m
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Description

Biennials to 1.5 m tall, densely with grayish yellow stellate hairs. Basal and lower stem leaves petiolate; leaf blade oblanceolate-oblong, to 15 X 6 cm, margin crenate. Other stem leaves gradually decreasing in size upward, sessile, oblong to ovate-oblong, base decurrent into wings. Spicate panicle cylindric, to 30 X 2 cm, dense. Flowers usually few fascicled. Pedicel short. Calyx ca. 7 mm; lobes lanceolate. Corolla yellow, 1-2 cm in diam. Stamens 5; filaments of anterior 2 stamens glabrous and of posterior 3 pubescent; anther lobes divergent at base. Capsule ovoid, as long as persistent calyx. Fl. Jun-Aug, fr. Jul-Oct.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Diagnostic Description

Diagnostic

"Biennial herbs to 1.5 m tall, with grayish-yellow dense, stellate hairs. Basal and lower stem leaves petiolate; leaf blade oblanceolate-oblong, to 15 X 6 cm, margin crenate; other cauline leaves gradually decreasing in size upward, sessile, oblong to ovate-oblong, base decurrent into wings. Spicate panicle cylindric, to 30 X 2 cm, dense. Flowers usually few fascicled; pedicel short. Calyx ca. 7 mm; lobes lanceolate. Corolla yellow, 1-2 cm in diam. Stamens 5; filaments of anterior 2 stamens glabrous and of posterior 3 pubescent; anther lobes divergent at base. Capsule ovoid, as long as persistent calyx."
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© India Biodiversity Portal

Source: India Biodiversity Portal

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Diagnostic

Habit: Herb/Undershrub
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© India Biodiversity Portal

Source: India Biodiversity Portal

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

General Habitat

Montane scrub jungles
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© India Biodiversity Portal

Source: India Biodiversity Portal

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat characteristics

More info for the term: cover

Common mullein occupies open sites. It is often described on disturbed sites such as roadsides, shores, fields, clearings, and vacant lots throughout its range [30,78,104,143,147] but is possible in any habitat without dense cover [41].

Climate: Common mullein tolerates a wide variety of growing conditions. Wide ecological amplitude has likely been more important than adaptation to local conditions in establishment and spread of this species. When common mullein seed collected from different elevations (246-7,421 feet (75-2,262 m)) in California [102] and in Hawaii [7] was grown in a common garden, relationships between elevation and distinctive plant traits were rare. Researchers in California suggested that common mullein has a "general-purpose genotype" [102]. Results were similar when seedlings from seed collected in Texas, Colorado, and Alberta were grown in a common area. Seedlings had similar photosynthetic rates at temperatures from 68 to 95 °F (20-35 °C). Although photosynthetic rates were higher at the coldest temperatures for plants from seed collected in cool habitats, researchers indicated that wide-ranging tolerances and not rapid local adaptation was most important to common mullein's wide distribution and success [149].

Differences in climate, latitude, and associated vegetation may affect development and life history of common mullein populations from southern Canada, North Carolina, Texas, and Georgia. In southern Canada, the growing season is short and precipitation ample and reliable. In North Carolina and Georgia, precipitation is abundant, and the growing season is long. In Texas, the growing season can be cut short by drought conditions. Sites in southern Canada with sparse vegetation had the most common mullein plants that did not flower until 3 or 4 years old. Annual common mullein plants were most common in Georgia, where associated vegetation cover increased to nearly 100% in 2 growing seasons. The most rapid annual development occurred in populations from southwestern Texas, where annual precipitation was lowest and hard frosts were uncommon [109,110]. The largest common mullein plants occurred on Texas sites with favorable moisture [111].

Life history differences between common mullein populations from southern Canada to Texas and Georgia [110]
Population location, number Probability of fruiting

Proportion fruiting as

annuals biennials triennials
Southern Canada, n=10 0.52 0 0.92 0.13
North Carolina, n=6 0.64 0 0.93 0.05
Texas, n=6; Georgia, n=2 0.62 0.27 0.73 0.01

Elevation: In Hawaii, common mullein occupies sites from near sea level to 4,596 m (15,080 feet) [7]. Elevation tolerances are not as wide for the rest of the United States.

Elevation range for common mullein in the western United States
State Elevation (feet)
Arizona 5,000-7,000 [67]
3,200-7,200 in Grand Canyon region [126]
California less than 7,200 [58]
Colorado 4,500-9,000 [56]
Nevada 4,000-8,700 [66]
New Mexico 6,000-8,500 [92]
Utah 4,000-9,010 [147]

Soils: Soil type is probably not important in limiting common mullein establishment or successful reproduction. Common mullein is described on "light" soils in Nova Scotia [113], "heavy" soils in Wisconsin [32], coarse soils in the Great Plains [131], and well-drained soils in the Adirondack Uplands [75]. Reinartz, who studied common mullein populations from southern Canada to Georgia and Texas, indicated that common mullein "thrives" on dry, infertile, highly calcareous soils as long as sunlight is abundant [109].

  • 78. Lackschewitz, Klaus. 1991. Vascular plants of west-central Montana--identification guidebook. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-227. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 648 p. [13798]
  • 147. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 7. Ansari, Shahin. 2007. Life history variation, population dynamics, and impact of the introduced weed mullein (Verbascum thapsus) on the island of Hawai'i. Manoa, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa. 292 p. Dissertation. [69409]
  • 30. Cronquist, Arthur; Holmgren, Arthur H.; Holmgren, Noel H.; Reveal, James L.; Holmgren, Patricia K. 1984. Intermountain flora: Vascular plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. 4: Subclass Asteridae, (except Asteraceae). New York: The New York Botanical Garden. 573 p. [718]
  • 32. Curtis, John T. 1959. Weed communities. In: Curtis, John T. The vegetation of Wisconsin. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press: 412-434. [60533]
  • 41. Duncan, Wilbur H.; Duncan, Marion B. 1987. The Smithsonian guide to seaside plants of the Gulf and Atlantic coasts from Louisiana to Massachusetts, exclusive of lower peninsular Florida. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. 409 p. [12906]
  • 56. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: The Swallow Press, Inc. 666 p. [6851]
  • 58. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 67. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 75. Kudish, Michael. 1992. Adirondack upland flora: an ecological perspective. Saranac, NY: The Chauncy Press. 320 p. [19376]
  • 92. Martin, William C.; Hutchins, Charles R. 1981. A flora of New Mexico. Volume 2. Germany: J. Cramer. 2589 p. [37176]
  • 102. Parker, Ingrid M.; Rodriguez, Joseph; Loik, Michael E. 2003. An evolutionary approach to understanding the biology of invasions: local adaptations and general-purpose genotypes in the weed Verbascum thapsus. Conservation Biology. 17(1): 59-72. [69372]
  • 104. Pojar, Jim; MacKinnon, Andy, eds. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest coast: Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska. Redmond, WA: Lone Pine Publishing. 526 p. [25159]
  • 109. Reinartz, James A. 1981. Biomass partitioning, life history, and population dynamics of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus L.). Durham, NC: Duke University. 178 p. Abstract. Dissertation. [69412]
  • 110. Reinartz, James A. 1984. Life history variation of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus) I. Latitudinal differences in population dynamics and timing of reproduction. Journal of Ecology. 72(3): 897-912. [69394]
  • 111. Reinartz, James A. 1984. Life history variation of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus) II. Plant size, biomass partitioning and morphology. Journal of Ecology. 72(3): 913-925. [69395]
  • 113. Roland, A. E.; Smith, E. C. 1969. The flora of Nova Scotia. Halifax, NS: Nova Scotia Museum. 746 p. [13158]
  • 126. Stevens, Lawrence E.; Ayers, Tina. 2002. The biodiversity and distribution of exotic vascular plants and animals in the Grand Canyon region. In: Tellman, Barbara, ed. Invasive exotic species in the Sonoran region. Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Studies in Natural History. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press; The Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum: 241-265. [48667]
  • 131. Stubbendieck, James; Coffin, Mitchell J.; Landholt, L. M. 2003. Weeds of the Great Plains. 3rd ed. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry. 605 p. In cooperation with: University of Nebraska, Lincoln. [50776]
  • 143. Voss, Edward G. 1996. Michigan flora. Part III: Dicots (Pyrolaceae--Compositae). Bulletin 61: Cranbrook Institute of Science; University of Michigan Herbarium. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan. 622 p. [30401]
  • 149. Williams, George J., III; Kemp, Paul R. 1976. Temperature relations of photosynthetic response in populations of Verbascum thapsus L. Oecologia. 25: 47-54. [70321]
  • 66. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 2 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Key Plant Community Associations

More info for the term: succession

Given a seed source and a canopy opening, common mullein is a potential
inhabitant of nearly any vegetation or community type. It has been described in
meadows, prairies, desert shrublands, chaparral, deciduous woodlands, and
coniferous forests throughout North America [16,32,123,135,152].
Common mullein typically produces ephemeral populations on disturbed sites.
Local extinction is common as succession progresses in most vegetation types.
Many common mullein studies have been conducted in abandoned agricultural fields.
Throughout this review, the age of old fields refers to time since abandonment or
time since last cultivation. For example, "1-year-old fields" have been
out of cultivation or left fallow for 1 year. In southwestern Michigan, common mullein
seedling establishment and survival was restricted to 1-year-old fields when seeds
were sown in both 1-year-old and 15-year-old fields [53]. Often common mullein is
not present in aboveground vegetation but appears soon after a disturbance. Establishment
on disturbed sites is most often the result of germination from a persistent seed bank.
These topics are discussed in more detail in Seed banking, Seedling establishment/growth, and Successional Status.
  • 16. Bossard, Carla C.; Randall, John M.; Hoshovsky, Marc C., eds. 2000. Invasive plants of California's wildlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 360 p. [38054]
  • 32. Curtis, John T. 1959. Weed communities. In: Curtis, John T. The vegetation of Wisconsin. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press: 412-434. [60533]
  • 53. Gross, Katherine L.; Werner, Patricia A. 1982. Colonizing abilities of "biennial" plant species in relation to ground cover: implications for their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology. 63(4): 921-931. [12143]
  • 123. Springer, Judith D. 1999. Soil seed bank in southwestern ponderosa pine: implications for ecological restoration. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University. 103 p. Thesis. [44467]
  • 135. Truksa, Amy S.; Yensen, Eric. 1990. Photographic evidence of vegetation changes in Adams County, Idaho. Journal of the Idaho Academy of Science. 26(1/2): 18-40. [16143]
  • 152. Wright, Clinton S.; Ottmar, Roger D.; Vihnanek, Robert E.; Weise, David R. 2002. Stereo photo series for quantifying natural fuels: grassland, shrubland, woodland, and forest types in Hawaii. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-545. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 91 p. [43371]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Range and Habitat in Illinois

Great Mullein is a common plant that occurs in all counties of Illinois (see Distribution Map). It is native to Eurasia, and may have been introduced into the United States as an herbal or ornamental plant. Habitats include limestone glades, rocky slopes and clay banks, pastures and fallow fields, areas along railroads and roadsides, vacant lots, and dry waste areas. Disturbed areas are preferred.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© John Hilty

Source: Illinois Wildflowers

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat in the United States

Common mullein can be found where mean annual precipitation is greater than 3-6 inches and the growing season lasts for a minimum of 140 days. Intolerant of shade, mullein will grow in almost any open area including natural meadows and forest openings as well as neglected pastures, road cuts, industrial areas. Common mullein prefers, but is not limited to, dry sandy soils.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

U.S. National Park Service Weeds Gone Wild website

Source: U.S. National Park Service

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Grassy areas on mountain slopes, along rivers; 1400-3200 m.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Growing in grassy areas on mountains slopes, along rivers; 1400-3200 m.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Wen, Jun

Source: Plants of Tibet

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Associations

Flower-Visiting Insects of Great Mullein in Illinois

Verbascum thapsus (Great Mullein) introduced
(Bees collect pollen primarily, while flies feed on pollen & are non-pollinating; observations are from Robertson)

Bees (long-tongued)
Apidae (Apinae): Apis mellifera cp; Apidae (Bombini): Bombus pensylvanica cp, Bombus vagans sn cp

Bees (short-tongued)
Halictidae (Halictinae): Agapostemon virescens cp, Augochloropsis metallica metallica cp, Lasioglossum coriaceus cp, Lasioglossum cressonii cp, Lasioglossum pectoralis cp, Lasioglossum versatus cp

Flies
Syrphidae: Allograpta obliqua fp np, Eupeodes americanus fp np, Syritta pipiens fp np, Toxomerus geminatus fp np, Toxomerus marginatus fp np, Trichopsomyia apisaon fp np; Anthomyiidae: Delia platura fp np

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Faunal Associations

Bumblebees are the most important pollinators of the flowers, where they seek nectar and pollen. Other insect visitors, which seek pollen, include Halictid bees and Syrphid flies. An unusual group of bees, consisting primarily of Anthidium spp. (Carder Bees) in North America, use the fuzzy hairs from the foliage as a water-proof lining in their nests. The seeds of Great Mullein are too small to be of much interest to birds, while the hairy foliage is avoided by mammalian herbivores. Both the foliage and the seeds may contain toxic compounds. Photographic Location
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© John Hilty

Source: Illinois Wildflowers

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

In Great Britain and/or Ireland:
Foodplant / open feeder
larva of Cionus hortulanus grazes on leaf of Verbascum thapsus

Foodplant / open feeder
larva of Cionus longicollis f. montanus grazes on leaf of Verbascum thapsus
Other: major host/prey

Foodplant / open feeder
larva of Cionus nigritarsis grazes on inflorescence of Verbascum thapsus

Foodplant / open feeder
larva of Cleopus pulchellus grazes on flower of Verbascum thapsus

Foodplant / parasite
cleistothecium of Leveillula verbasci parasitises live Verbascum thapsus
Remarks: season: 10-11

Foodplant / parasite
sporangium of Peronospora verbasci parasitises live Verbascum thapsus

Foodplant / saprobe
linearly arranged, immersed, becoming erumpent Phomopsis coelomycetous anamorph of Phomopsis verbasci is saprobic on dead stem of Verbascum thapsus
Remarks: season: 3

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

Broad-scale Impacts of Plant Response to Fire

More info for the terms: alvar, basal area, cover, crown fire, density, duff, fire severity, fire use, forb, frequency, fuel, litter, low-severity fire, prescribed fire, relative frequency, severity, shrubs, surface fire, top-kill, tree, wildfire

Common mullein is often observed on burned sites [16,40,43,76,83,115,116,118,134]
even where it was not present before fire or on unburned sites [8,23,24,98,105].
In only one study was common mullein present before a fire and not after. In southwestern
Illinois common mullein was not present after an early March, low-severity fire but was
present in prefire sampling of the post oak/little bluestem (Q. stellata/Schizachyrium scoparium)
vegetation. The fire consumed most of the litter in grassy portions of the site but only the
leaf litter layer under trees and shrubs. Common mullein abundance was not reported [57].

General descriptions of common mullein on burned sites are abundant. Common mullein
establishes rapidly after fire in western Sierra Nevada [16]. Common mullein is one of
the first plants observed after major disturbances, especially fire, in California's
Shasta-Trinity and Six Rivers National Forests [43]. In ponderosa pine forests near near
Flagstaff, Arizona, common mullein is often found around fire-killed old-growth trees [115,116].
On Fire Island in Suffolk County, New York, common mullein is often abundant on
burned sites [40]. Two to three years after an early summer wildfire, common mullein was
present on low- and high-severity burned areas of the White Mountain
Apache Tribal lands in central eastern Arizona [76].
Common mullein often occurs in early postfire communities regardless of fire severity,
although often absent in prefire or nearby unburned communities. Common mullein is a frequent
early-seral species on burned sites with deep white ash, especially on northeast slopes of
chaparral vegetation in Kern County, California [83]. Common mullein was absent from unburned
but occurred with 20% frequency and 1% cover on burned sites one year after an "intense
wildfire" in Gambel oak and mountain shrubland vegetation in Heber Valley near Midway,
Utah [105]. Frequency of common mullein was 3.2% on burned sites 100 days after a severe fire
in alvar woodlands near Ottawa, Ontario. The fire occurred on 23 June 1999, spread 49 feet (15 m)
per minute and produced flame lengths over 98 feet (30 m). Common mullein was absent from
unburned sites. A year after the first postfire sampling, common mullein frequency increased to
8% [23,24]. Common mullein was not present in the prefire community but had 6% frequency in the
first postfire year after a spring prescribed fire in basin big sagebrush/Idaho fescue (Artemisia
tridentata subsp. tridentata/Festuca idahoensis)-bluebunch wheatgrass vegetation
at John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon [118].
See the Research Project Summary of this work for more information on fire effects on common mullein and 60 additional forb, grass, and woody plant species. Common mullein cover was greater on
severely burned than moderately burned sites 2 years after June and July wildfires in closed-canopy,
even-aged ponderosa pine forests on the Mogollon and Kaibab Plateaus in central and northern
Arizona. On moderately burned areas, trees had some crown scorch but few were dead. On severely
burned areas, nearly all were trees killed. Common mullein cover was less than 0.5% on unburned,
1% on moderately burned, and 5% on severely burned sites [29].
Lyon's Research Paper provides information on prescribed fire use and postfire response of plant
species including common mullein.
Postfire persistence: Abundance of common mullein
typically decreases as time since fire increases [11,14,86]. Common mullein may persist longer on
high-severity burn sites [14,134]. Some studies also show common mullein on unburned sites
several years after a fire [14,86], suggesting that seed produced on adjacent or nearby burned
sites may make its way to unburned sites. Populations on unburned sites are typically small and/or
short-lived [14].
In most cases, postfire populations of common mullein are ephemeral. Persistence, however,
can be extended on high-severity burned areas. In the 1st year after an April 1991 fire in Wind
Cave National Park, South Dakota, common mullein occurred in dense patches and was the dominant
species in terms of cover, frequency, and density. In postfire year 2, density of common mullein
averaged more than 44 plants/m², and in the 4th postfire year, common mullein density had declined
to an average of 8 plants/m². By 2002, cover and frequency of common mullein were less than 1% [11].
After a spring prescribed fire in grand fir/Oregon boxwood (Abies grandis/Pachistima
myrsinites) habitat type on the Clearwater National Forest in north-central Idaho, the
frequency of common mullein was 6% for the first 2 postfire years but did not occur on burned sites
the 4th postfire year. The fire was a head fire and burned when the air temperature was 82 °F
(28 °C), relative humidity was 25%, and winds were negligible. Common mullein appeared but
frequency was just 1% on unburned sites in the 4th postfire year. Unburned sites likely received
seed from plants on burned sites [86].
After a May fire in ponderosa pine stands on the Coconino National Forest, common mullein
appeared later on high-severity than on low-severity burned sites. Common mullein persisted 9
years on low-severity burn patches but was present in low abundance 30 years after fire on
severely burned patches. On high-severity burns, most trees were killed in a crown fire or
severe surface fire. On low-severity burns, most trees survived. Common mullein's occurrence
on unburned sites may be related to prefire or postfire logging operations or possibly smoke
effects. For more on the potential effects of smoke on common mullein seed, see Seed survival. Common mullein was not present 3 years after a
1977 prescribed fire in a previously unburned site. Presented below is a summary of common
mullein production on burned and unburned sites [14]. Production may not be the best measure
for a biennial species since values can be vastly different between rosette and flowering
years.
Production of common mullein (kg/ha) on high-
and low-severity burned and unburned sites up to 30 years after fire in
Coconino National Forest [14]
Sampling yearHigh severityLow severityUnburned
since prescribed fire in 1977
Unburned
1972
(~4 months after fire)
033.737.2no data
197426.5174.406.7
1980010.900
20020.2000
20030.3000

After a severe, stand-replacing July fire in a second growth Douglas-fir forest
in Pattee Canyon near Missoula, Montana, common mullein was present on 2-year-old,
5-year-old, and 10-year-old burned stands. Abundance was not reported. The fire burned
when winds were strong, temperatures were high, and relative humidity was low [134].
Repeated fire: The only study of repeated
fire in common mullein habitat suggests that multiple fires may be tolerated. Common
mullein was absent from unburned sites but occurred with low relative frequency (0.3-0.5/m²)
on sites burned annually for 3 years or every other year in mixed red pine
(Pinus resinosa)-eastern white pine stands on the W K Kellogg Experimental Forest in
southwestern Michigan. The low-severity surface fires were set in May and produced little crown
scorch, but produced nearly complete top-kill in the understory. Fire characteristics and the
postfire regeneration of other associated species is described in a Summary of research conducted by Neumann and Dickmann [98].
Fire and logging: In the following studies,
common mullein abundance was always greater on sites that were cut and burned than on sites
that were only cut. Fire and logging disturbances create openings in the canopy and expose
common mullein seed to the light which facilitates the germination and establishment of common
mullein. For more detail, see Germination,
Seedling establishment/growth
, and Impacts and Control.
In the Lick Creek area of west-central Montana's Bitterroot National Forest, common mullein
cover was greater on burned than unburned shelterwood cut sites. Cutting decreased the basal
area of overstory trees from 117 feet² to 52 feet² in the ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir stands.
Portions of the cutting units were burned in low- and high-consumption spring or fall prescribed
fires. About 80% of the woody fuel was consumed in the high-consumption fire. Mineral soil exposure
was 4% in cut but unburned, 8% in low-consumption, and 9% in high-consumption burned sites. Common
mullein cover was slightly greater on high-consumption burned areas for the first 3 postfire years,
but by the 4th postfire year common mullein cover on low- and high-consumption burned areas was
nearly the same [8].
Average percent cover of common mullein on unburned,
low-consumption, and high-consumption burned* areas of a shelterwood cutting unit [8]
Site typeTime since fire (years)
0
(pretreatment)
1234
Unburned00.40.80.30.1
Low-consumption burn02.73.61.61.2
High-consumption burn03.24.92.21.3
*Weather conditions during spring and/or
fall prescribed fires: air temperature: 50-74 °F, relative humidity: 35-75%, winds:
mostly <5 miles/hour.

Common mullein density and biomass were wide ranging on logged and logged and burned
ponderosa pine stands in the Coconino National Forest. The greatest density and biomass of
common mullein occurred on cut and moderately burned sites. About 6,750 board feet were
removed from the area 2 years before burning. Nearly 100% of the remaining trees were killed
on severely burned plots, and tree mortality was low on moderately burned plots. Common mullein
densities on the 2 plots sampled in each treatment site were very different. Plot placement and
available seed sources many have affected these differences more than treatment effects [15].
Range of common mullein density and biomass on 2 plots
in unburned, moderately burned, and severely burned areas of a logged ponderosa pine
stand [15]
Burn severityDensity (stems/ha)Biomass (kg/ha)
Unburned0-2000-12.9
Moderate100-1,70011.2-28.9
Severe0-1,1000-11.3

In 80- to 90-year-old ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir stands in western Montana, common mullein was more abundant on thinned and burned than on thinned-only or
burned-only plots.
Researchers suggested that this difference may have been due to the increased frequency
and severity of cut and burn treatments. Two consecutive disturbances led to the largest
reduction in the overstory because additional trees were lost on logged sites after the
fire, and slash piles on the thinned and burned site likely produced more severe fires
than the burn treatment alone. Thinning treatments in the winter of 2001 reduced the basal
area by about 50%. Prescription strip head fires occurred in May or June of 2002 [38]. For
additional information on the fire and thinning treatments, see the Research Project Summary
by Metlen and others.
Burned slash piles: Common mullein is often found on
severely burned sites after long-smoldering fires in logging slash. In the Arboretum at
Flagstaff, Arizona, common mullein was not present before the mechanical removal or burning
of slash piles. Slash piles were up to 6.6 feet (2 m) tall, 13 feet (4 m) wide, and burned in
August or October. In the first posttreatment year, common mullein density was greatest
(13 plants/m²) on sites where piles were mechanically removed, and density was up to 1 plant/m²
on some burned areas. Slash fires were severe: all duff was consumed and only mineral soil and
ash remained [122]. Common mullein appeared on sites where logging slash was burned in mixed-conifer
forests of the Mission Mountains in Montana's Flathead National Forest 2 to 15 years after logging
and slash burning. The frequency of common mullein was 15.6% in slash burn sites. Slash fires were
severe, produced high temperatures and altered soil properties. Subsurface soil layers were deep-yellow
to reddish-brown in color [141].
  • 14. Bataineh, Amanda L.; Oswald, Brian P.; Bataineh, Mohammad M.; Williams, Hans M.; Coble, Dean W. 2006. Changes in understory vegetation of a ponderosa pine forest in northern Arizona 30 years after a wildfire. Forest Ecology and Management. 235(1-3): 283-294. [65009]
  • 15. Beaulieu, Jean Thomas. 1975. Effects of fire on understory plant populations in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University. 38 p. Thesis. [29095]
  • 16. Bossard, Carla C.; Randall, John M.; Hoshovsky, Marc C., eds. 2000. Invasive plants of California's wildlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 360 p. [38054]
  • 23. Catling, Paul M.; Sinclair, Adrianne; Cuddy, Don. 2001. Vascular plants of a successional alvar burn 100 days after a severe fire and their mechanisms of re-establishment. Canadian Field Naturalist. 115(2): 214-222. [45889]
  • 24. Catling, Paul M.; Sinclair, Adrianne; Cuddy, Don. 2002. Plant community composition and relationship of disturbed and undisturbed alvar woodland. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 116(4): 571-579. [51184]
  • 29. Crawford, Julie A.; Wahren, C.-H. A.; Kyle, S.; Moir, W. H. 2001. Responses of exotic plant species to fires in Pinus ponderosa forests in northern Arizona. Journal of Vegetation Science. 12(2): 261-268. [40145]
  • 38. Dodson, Erich K.; Fiedler, Carl E. 2006. Impacts of restoration treatments on alien plant invasion in Pinus ponderosa forests, Montana, USA. Journal of Applied Ecology. 43(5): 887-897. [64055]
  • 40. Dowhan, Joseph J.; Rozsa, Ron. 1989. Flora of Fire Island, Suffolk County, New York. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 116(3): 265-282. [22041]
  • 43. Everett, Yvonne. 1997. A guide to selected non-timber forest products of the Hayfork Adaptive Management Area, Shasta-Trinity and Six Rivers National Forests, California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-162. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 64 p. [28986]
  • 57. Heikens, Alice Long; West, K. Andrew; Robertson, Philip A. 1994. Short-term response of chert and shale barrens vegetation to fire in southwestern Illinois. Castanea. 59(3): 274-285. [27228]
  • 76. Kuenzi, Amanda M.; Fule, Peter Z.; Sieg, Carolyn Hull. 2008. Effects of fire severity and pre-fire stand treatment on plant community recovery after a large wildfire. Forest Ecology and Management. 255(3-4): 855-865. [69958]
  • 83. Lawrence, George E. 1966. Ecology of vertebrate animals in relation to chaparral fire in the Sierra Nevada foothills. Ecology. 47(2): 278-291. [147]
  • 86. Leege, Thomas A.; Godbolt, Grant. 1985. Herbaceous response following prescribed burning and seeding of elk range in Idaho. Northwest Science. 59(2): 134-143. [1436]
  • 98. Neumann, David D.; Dickmann, Donald I. 2001. Surface burning in a mature stand of Pinus resinosa and Pinus strobus in Michigan: effects on understory vegetation. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 10: 91-101. [40201]
  • 105. Poreda, Stephen F.; Wullstein, Leroy H. 1994. Vegetation recovery following fire in an oakbrush vegetation mosaic. The Great Basin Naturalist. 54: 380-383. [25512]
  • 115. Sackett, Stephen S.; Haase, Sally M.; Harrington, Michael G. 1996. Lessons learned from fire use for restoring southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems. In: Covington, Wallace; Wagner, Pamela K., technical coordinators. Conference on adaptive ecosystem restoration and management: restoration of Cordilleran conifer landscapes of North America: Proceedings; 1996 June 6-8; Flagstaff, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-278. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 54-61. [26924]
  • 116. Sackett, Stephen; Haase, Sally; Harrington, M. G. 1993. Restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems with fire. In: Covington, M. Wallace; Debano, Leonard F.; Covington, W. W., tech. coords. Sustainable ecological systems: implementing an ecological approach to land management: Proceedings; 1993 July 12-15; Flagstaff, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-247. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 115-121. [37424]
  • 118. Sapsis, David B. 1990. Ecological effects of spring and fall prescribed burning on basin big sagebrush/Idaho fescue--bluebunch wheatgrass communities. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 105 p. Thesis. [16579]
  • 122. Seymour, Geoffrey B. 2004. Impact of slash pile burning on soil and plant community in a ponderosa pine forest. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University. 104 p. Thesis. [55635]
  • 134. Toth, Barbara L. 1991. Factors affecting conifer regeneration and community structure after a wildfire in western Montana. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 124 p. Thesis. [14425]
  • 141. Vogl, Richard J.; Ryder, Calvin. 1969. Effects of slash burning on conifer reproduction in Montana's Mission Range. Northwest Science. 43(3): 135-147. [8546]
  • 8. Arno, Stephen F. 1999. Undergrowth response, shelterwood cutting unit. In: Smith, Helen Y., Arno, Stephen F., eds. Eighty-eight years of change in a managed ponderosa pine forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-23. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 36-37. [+ Appendix C: Summary of vegetation changes in shelterwood cutting unit]. [38264]
  • 11. Barstatis, Noah; Sieg, C. H. 2004. Long-term response of two exotic plant species following a wildfire in the Black Hills, South Dakota, [Online]. In: 2nd international wildland fire ecology and fire management congress: Proceedings; 2003 November 17; Orlando, FL. Poster Session 2 - Fire Effects. [Publication location unknown]: [Publisher unknown]: 1 p. Available: http://ams.confex.com/ams/FIRE2003/techprogram/paper_66821.htm [2006, October 12]. [64214]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Plant Response to Fire

More info for the terms: density, frequency

Germination of on-site seed is the predominant postfire regeneration method for common mullein. It is often present in the first postfire growing season, regardless of the timing of the fire. However, postfire emergence can be delayed and population persistence may be extended on sites burned in high-severity fires.

Seed survival: Common mullein seed in the soil is likely to survive and germinate after fire. However, high-severity fires with extended smoldering such as slash pile burns may kill a greater proportion of the common mullein seed bank [72,122]. In several studies, common mullein seedlings emerged from soils collected on burned sites. Emergence can be greater from soil samples collected on less severely [63] and less recently burned sites [125]. Yet germination from severely burned sites in the first postfire growing season is possible as well [63,122]. It is important to note that common mullein seed bank estimates can be affected by sample size, sample location, and experimental method. Abundant seed production and limited dispersal means that soil samples collected near or far away from a site once occupied by a prolific parent plant could affect findings [52,53,73].

Postfire establishment of common mullein may be delayed on some sites. Common mullein seedlings emerged from soil samples taken from 5-year-old burned but not from 1-year-old burned Douglas-fir forests in south-central British Columbia. Seedlings emerged from 7% of samples on 5-year-old burned sites and 41% of samples in 10-year-old clearcuts. On clearcut sites, common mullein's aboveground frequency was 6% [125]. Reasons for delayed postfire emergence are unknown. Severe fires likely consume more common mullein seeds since they typically consume the surface organic horizons. On less severely burned sites, it is possible that seed stored for an extended period in the mineral soil may require more time to germinate under field conditions. In a greenhouse study, dark germination of common mullein seed was lower after 2 years of burial than after 1 year of burial; researchers speculated that unknown factors associated with burial may prevent immediate germination [13]. A controlled study of the effects of heat on common mullein seed would improve the understanding of its seed bank dynamics on burned sites.

Common mullein emergence is sometimes lower on high-severity than low- or moderate-severity burned sites in the first 1 to 2 postfire growing seasons. Common mullein seedlings emerged from soils collected on low- and high-severity burned ponderosa pine forests in northern New Mexico's Rendija Canyon. The Cerro Grande fire burned in May 2000, and soil was collected in the fall of 2001. Forty-three, 0, and 1 seedlings emerged from plots sampled in low-, moderate-, and high-severity burned sites, respectively [63]. Common mullein was the dominant emergent from soil samples collected 10 feet (3 m) outside slash burn scars in ponderosa pine forests in Arizona's Coconino National Forest. Soil samples were taken 3 and 15 months after burning. There were 368 common mullein seedlings/m² in soil samples collected outside the burn scar. Density of common mullein from soil collected inside the scar was not given, but total seedling emergence (all species) from inside the scar was less than 50 emergents/m². These results suggest that some common mullein seed is killed by high-severity slash pile fires [72].

Fire may stimulate germination of common mullein seeds through chemical cues from smoke. Liquid smoke treatments increased common mullein emergence from soils collected in open-canopy ponderosa pine forests in northern Arizona. Common mullein averaged 35% frequency in the aboveground vegetation. Density of common mullein was 126 seedlings/m² in untreated soils and 252 seedlings/m² in soils treated with 60 mL of 10% liquid smoke [3].

  • 3. Abella, Scott R.; Springer, Judith D.; Covington, W. Wallace. 2007. Seed banks of an Arizona Pinus ponderosa landscape: responses to environmental gradients and fire cues. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 37: 552-567. [67962]
  • 13. Baskin, Jerry M.; Baskin, Carol C. 1981. Seasonal changes in germination responses of buried seeds of Verbascum thapsus and Verbascum blattaria and ecological implications. Canadian Journal of Botany. 59(9): 1796-1775. [69375]
  • 52. Gross, Katherine L.; Werner, Patricia A. 1978. Biology of Canadian Weeds. 28. Verbascum thapsus L. and Verbascum blattaria L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 58(2): 401-413. [69386]
  • 53. Gross, Katherine L.; Werner, Patricia A. 1982. Colonizing abilities of "biennial" plant species in relation to ground cover: implications for their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology. 63(4): 921-931. [12143]
  • 63. Hunter, Molly E.; Omi, Philip N. 2006. Seed supply of native and cultivated grasses in pine forests of the southwestern United States and the potential for vegetation recovery following wildfire. Plant Ecology. 183: 1-8. [62623]
  • 72. Korb, Julie E.; Johnson, Nancy C.; Covington, W. W. 2004. Slash pile burning effects on soil biotic and chemical properties and plant establishment: recommendations for amelioration. Restoration Ecology. 12(1): 52-62. [47464]
  • 73. Korb, Julie E.; Springer, Judith D.; Powers, Stephanie R.; Moore, Margaret M. 2005. Soil seed banks in Pinus ponderosa forests in Arizona: clues to site history and restoration potential. Applied Vegetation Science. 8: 103-112. [68811]
  • 122. Seymour, Geoffrey B. 2004. Impact of slash pile burning on soil and plant community in a ponderosa pine forest. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University. 104 p. Thesis. [55635]
  • 125. Stark, Kaeli E.; Arsenault, Andre; Bradfield, Gary E. 2006. Soil seed banks and plant community assembly following disturbance by fire and logging in interior Douglas-fir forests of south-central British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Botany. 84(10): 1548-1560. [65962]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Post-fire Regeneration

More info for the terms: ground residual colonizer, secondary colonizer

POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY [129]:
Ground residual colonizer (on site, initial community)
Secondary colonizer (on- or off-site seed sources)
  • 129. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species comprising secondary plant succession in Northern Rocky Mountain forests. FEIS workshop: Postfire regeneration. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. 10 p. [20090]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Fire Ecology

More info for the terms: fire frequency, fire regime, fire severity, frequency, fuel, severity

Fire adaptations: Common mullein is typical in early postfire communities [14,23,24,86]. In most cases, common mullein establishes from soil-stored seed on burned sites. For additional information, see Plant Response to Fire.

FIRE REGIMES: The prevailing fire regime in which common mullein evolved is not described in the available literature. FIRE REGIMES in North American common mullein habitats are difficult to characterize, since common mullein occurs in nearly any vegetation type. Because common mullein is a rapidly reproducing, early-seral species, it is unlikely that frequent fire would eliminate it. The persistent common mullein seed bank suggests that long fire-return intervals would likely be tolerated too.

Common mullein fuel characteristics were not described in the reviewed literature, and dense common mullein populations are normally short-lived. Persistent dense populations are described in California meadows and in subalpine and alpine regions of Hawaii. As of this writing (2008), effects of these persistent common mullein stands on fire frequency or fire severity were not described. The complete FEIS Fire Regime Table provides fire regime information for many vegetation types and plant communities in which common mullein may occur.

  • 14. Bataineh, Amanda L.; Oswald, Brian P.; Bataineh, Mohammad M.; Williams, Hans M.; Coble, Dean W. 2006. Changes in understory vegetation of a ponderosa pine forest in northern Arizona 30 years after a wildfire. Forest Ecology and Management. 235(1-3): 283-294. [65009]
  • 23. Catling, Paul M.; Sinclair, Adrianne; Cuddy, Don. 2001. Vascular plants of a successional alvar burn 100 days after a severe fire and their mechanisms of re-establishment. Canadian Field Naturalist. 115(2): 214-222. [45889]
  • 24. Catling, Paul M.; Sinclair, Adrianne; Cuddy, Don. 2002. Plant community composition and relationship of disturbed and undisturbed alvar woodland. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 116(4): 571-579. [51184]
  • 86. Leege, Thomas A.; Godbolt, Grant. 1985. Herbaceous response following prescribed burning and seeding of elk range in Idaho. Northwest Science. 59(2): 134-143. [1436]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Successional Status

More info on this topic.

More info for the terms: alvar, cover, density, forb, frequency, natural, severity, succession, tree

Common mullein is an early-seral species. On disturbed sites, common mullein emerges from soil-stored seed. Common mullein rarely persists beyond the first few postdisturbance years. However, in some meadows of California and sparsely vegetated alpine sites in Hawaii, common mullein is not restricted to disturbed sites and has not been replaced in natural succession. For more on these exceptions, see Impacts and Control.

Rarely is common mullein described in undisturbed communities. The creation of sunny, open sites by heavy grazing, severe storms, logging, fire, or other disturbances is generally necessary for common mullein establishment, growth, and reproductive success. On south-facing slopes of Gregory Canyon near Boulder, Colorado, common mullein did not grow on "deeply-shaded sites" [4]. Even large-sized common mullein plants typically die or fail to reproduce on shaded sites (Reinartz, unpublished data cited in [110]). In West Yellowstone, common mullein was found only at sites with less than 30% canopy cover, and most occurrences (75%) were at sites with ≤5% canopy cover [6]. In coastal upland habitats of southern New England and adjacent New York, common mullein occurred only on open plots and not on any of the 56 heath-dominated, 175 shrubland, or 446 forested plots [142].

Postdisturbance common mullein populations are typically ephemeral, and as time since disturbance increases, common mullein abundance normally decreases. Old-field succession was evaluated on many sites in southwestern Michigan. Common mullein was often abundant only in fields less than 5 years old [53]. Common mullein established from long-lived seeds present in the seed bank at the time of disturbance. As time since disturbance increased, the proportion of open space decreased as did the probability of successful establishment. In old fields, local common mullein extinctions are rapid, but long-lived, soil-stored seed emergence is likely with the next disturbances [48,54]. Common mullein populations in southern Canada, North Carolina, Texas, and Georgia rarely persisted more than 4 years after disturbance. Of the 24 populations monitored, only 2 had germination in the year after initial postdisturbance population establishment [110].

Vegetation type and disturbance severity may affect the persistence of common mullein in early-seral communities. In the Yale-Myers Forest of northeastern Connecticut, common mullein was present the first year after all vegetation was removed from 85-year-old northern red oak (Q. rubra) stands but was not present the third year after vegetation removal. On sites where only the canopy was removed, common mullein did not occur [5]. In ponderosa pine forests of the Southwest, common mullein may occur in low abundance up to 30 years after severe fire [14].

Grazing: Common mullein is often described on severely grazed sites. In British Columbia and Montana rangelands, common mullein does not normally occur in "climax" grasslands, but its abundance increases as range condition deteriorates [77,94]. In southwestern Utah, common mullein was one of several species noted on "depleted," "severely grazed" Gambel oak types [18]. On overgrazed sties in South Dakota, common mullein is "especially prevalent" and "extremely abundant" [64]. In Wisconsin's Coon Valley, common mullein often appears when there is grazing in black oak (Q. velutina) communities [91]. Common mullein is also common on heavily grazed cleared forests and bluegrass grasslands attacked by June beetle larvae. In these areas, the tall weedy forb community can become an "impenetrable jungle-like thicket 4 to 7 feet (1.2-2 m) tall" [32].

While increased abundance of common mullein on grazed sites is normal, on the Blandy Experimental Farm in Virginia, common mullein decreased more rapidly on old fields with herbivore pressure than on those without. Direct use of common mullein by the grazers was not evaluated, and consumption of seeds or plants may have affected results [17].

Change in percent cover with time and herbivore exclusion treatments in Virginia [17]
Time span Control
(all animals allowed)
Deer excluded Small rodents allowed All animals excluded
Year 1 to 2 +11.9 +17.3 +12.9 +18.9
Year 2 to 3 -4.8 -10.3 -5.6 -19.5
Year 3 to 4 -5.0 -10.0 -12.2 -6

Storms: Severe storm events that cause tree mortality and create canopy openings provide early-seral habitat for common mullein. Four years after Hurricane Fran (1996), common mullein occurred in plots that were damaged on North Carolina's Duke University Forest. The hurricane created patchy forest openings [132]. In Minnesota's Cedar Creek Natural History Area, common mullein frequency ranged from 2.2% to 42% in areas where eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) trees were uprooted by a July windstorm that reduced tree density from 1,104 to 446 trees/ha. Fourteen years after the storm, common mullein frequency still ranged from 3.8% to 16.1% [100].

Logging and fire: Common mullein frequently occupies newly cut forest sites throughout its range. Common mullein was abundant in the first year after 100-year-old eastern white pine stands were clearcut in northwestern Connecticut. Sites were bulldozed following cutting to expose mineral soil. There were over 100 common mullein plants on the two 5,000 m² treated plots [35]. Common mullein frequency was 23% three years after a mixed-conifer forest was clearcut and burned in northeastern Oregon's Wallowa Mountains. By 14 years after the treatment, common mullein frequency was reduced to 3% or less [95]. In ponderosa pine forests on Mt Trumbull in northern Arizona, common mullein occurred on skid trails and in areas where slash was piled during a thinning operation. Common mullein did not occur on undisturbed sites, and density on treated sites averaged 2.9 plants/m² [123].

Common mullein frequency increased with increasing intensity of cutting in ponderosa pine forests on Arizona's Coconino National Forest. Common mullein frequency was greatest on sites with the greatest tree reduction. Common mullein frequency increased from the 3rd to the 6th posttreatment year on the most heavily thinned plots. Thinned sites were also burned in strip head fires [1,2].

Frequency of common mullein with increased intensity of thinning of ponderosa pine forests [1]
Treatment intensity Pretreatment density of ponderosa pine (trees/ha) Posttreatment density of ponderosa pine (trees/ha) Frequency of common mullein (%) 3 years after treatments Frequency of common mullein (%) 6 years after treatments [2]
Control 1,188 1,188 0 0
Low 1,044 243 <1 no data
Medium 1,492 170 12 11
High 956 140 14 56

On the same sites discussed above, researchers experimentally scarified soils with increasing intensity and evaluated common mullein frequency. On unthinned plots, soil disturbance was followed by little change (≤6%) in common mullein frequency. On thinned plots common mullein frequency increased 0% to 28% after soil disturbance [2].

Frequency of common mullein was much greater on bulldozed than burned sites after a severe fire in alvar woodlands near Ottawa, Ontario. Common mullein frequency was 8% fifteen months after the fire. In the bulldozed area of the adjacent unburned site, the frequency of common mullein was 50% [23,24].

For more on common mullein and fire, see Fire Effects.

  • 1. Abella, Scott R.; Covington, W. Wallace. 2004. Monitoring an Arizona ponderosa pine restoration: sampling efficiency and multivariate analysis of understory vegetation. Restoration Ecology. 12(3): 359-367. [61727]
  • 2. Abella, Scott R.; Covington, W. Wallace. 2007. Forest-floor treatments in Arizona ponderosa pine restoration ecosystems: no short-term effects on plant communities. Western North American Naturalist. 67(1): 120-132. [67217]
  • 4. Adams, W. W., III; Demmig-Adams, B.; Tosenstiel, T. N.; Brightwell, A. K.; Ebbert, V. 2002. Photosynthesis and photoprotection in overwintering plants. Plant Biology. 4(5): 545-557. [69373]
  • 5. Aikens, Melissa L.; Ellum, David; McKenna, John J.; Kelty, Matthew J.; Ashton, Mark S. 2007. The effects of disturbance intensity on temporal and spatial patterns of herb colonization in a southern New England mixed-oak forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 252: 144-158. [68902]
  • 6. Allen, Karen; Hansen, Katherine. 1999. Geography of exotic plants adjacent to campgrounds, Yellowstone National Park, USA. The Great Basin Naturalist. 59(4): 315-322. [33975]
  • 14. Bataineh, Amanda L.; Oswald, Brian P.; Bataineh, Mohammad M.; Williams, Hans M.; Coble, Dean W. 2006. Changes in understory vegetation of a ponderosa pine forest in northern Arizona 30 years after a wildfire. Forest Ecology and Management. 235(1-3): 283-294. [65009]
  • 17. Bowers, Michael A. 1993. Influence of herbivorous mammals on an old-field plant community: years 1--4 after disturbance. Oikos. 67: 129-141. [22626]
  • 18. Bowns, James E. 1985. Rehabilitation and management of Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii) dominated ranges in southwestern Utah. In: Johnson, Kendall L., ed. Proceedings, 3rd Utah shrub ecology workshop; 1983 August 30-31; Provo, UT. Logan, UT: Utah State University, College of Natural Resources: 29-32. [3083]
  • 23. Catling, Paul M.; Sinclair, Adrianne; Cuddy, Don. 2001. Vascular plants of a successional alvar burn 100 days after a severe fire and their mechanisms of re-establishment. Canadian Field Naturalist. 115(2): 214-222. [45889]
  • 24. Catling, Paul M.; Sinclair, Adrianne; Cuddy, Don. 2002. Plant community composition and relationship of disturbed and undisturbed alvar woodland. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 116(4): 571-579. [51184]
  • 32. Curtis, John T. 1959. Weed communities. In: Curtis, John T. The vegetation of Wisconsin. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press: 412-434. [60533]
  • 35. Del Tredici, Peter. 1977. The buried seeds of Comptonia peregrina, the sweet fern. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 104(3): 270-275. [21893]
  • 48. Gross, Katherine L. 1980. Colonization by Verbascum thapsus (mullein) of an old-field in Michigan- experiments on the effects of vegetation. Journal of Ecology. 68(3): 919-927. [69385]
  • 53. Gross, Katherine L.; Werner, Patricia A. 1982. Colonizing abilities of "biennial" plant species in relation to ground cover: implications for their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology. 63(4): 921-931. [12143]
  • 54. Gross, Katherine Lynn. 1980. Ecological consequences of differences in life history charactereistics among four "biennial" plant species. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. 120 p. Dissertation. [70381]
  • 64. Johnson, James R.; Nichols, James T. 1970. Plants of South Dakota grasslands: A photographic study. Bull. 566. Brookings, SD: South Dakota State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. 163 p. [18483]
  • 77. Lacey, John; Mosley, John. 2002. 250 plants for range contests in Montana. MONTGUIDE MT198402 AG 6/2002. Range E-2 (Misc.). Bozeman, MT: Montana State University, Extension Service. 4 p. [43671]
  • 91. Marks, J. B. 1942. Land use and plant succession in Coon Valley, Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs. 12(2): 113-133. [63597]
  • 94. McLean, Alastair; Marchand, Leonard. 1968. Grassland ranges in the southern interior of British Columbia. Publication 1319. Ottawa, Canada: Canada Department of Agriculture, Division. 18 p. [1622]
  • 95. Miller, Richard F.; Krueger, William C.; Vavra, Martin. 1986. Twelve years of plant succession on a seeded clearcut under grazing and protection from cattle. In: Special Report 773. 1986 Progress report...research in rangeland management. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station: 4-10. In cooperation with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. [3650]
  • 100. Palmer, Michael W.; McAlister, Suzanne D.; Arevalo, Jose Ramon; DeCoster, James K. 2000. Changes in the understory during 14 years following catastrophic windthrow in two Minnesota forests. Journal of Vegetation Science. 11(6): 841-854. [42541]
  • 110. Reinartz, James A. 1984. Life history variation of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus) I. Latitudinal differences in population dynamics and timing of reproduction. Journal of Ecology. 72(3): 897-912. [69394]
  • 123. Springer, Judith D. 1999. Soil seed bank in southwestern ponderosa pine: implications for ecological restoration. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University. 103 p. Thesis. [44467]
  • 132. Taverna, Kristin; Peet, Robert K.; Phillips, Laura C. 2005. Long-term change in ground-layer vegetation of deciduous forests of the North Carolina Piedmont, USA. Journal of Ecology. 93: 202-213. [51495]
  • 142. Von Holle, Betsy; Motzkin, Glenn. 2007. Historical land use and environmental determinants of nonnative plant distribution in coastal southern New England. Biological Conservation. 136(1): 33-43. [65837]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Regeneration Processes

More info for the terms: cohort, cover, density, fitness, frequency, litter, natural, vernalization

Common mullein reproduces entirely by seed and has no means of vegetative regeneration [48].

Pollination and breeding system: Self and cross pollination of common mullein flowers are both possible. If by the end of the day an open flower has not been visited by a pollinator, it is self pollinated ("delayed selfing") [10,52]. While common mullein flowers are visited by a variety of insects, only short- and long-tongued bees are effective pollinators (Pennell 1935, cited in [52]), [22]. In field and greenhouse studies, researchers found that flowers fertilized by natural, delayed selfing set less seed than flowers that were outcrossed. Flowers pollinated by delayed selfing produced 75% of maximum fruit set. Delayed selfing may be important to small common mullein populations that may fail to attract pollinators [39].

Plant height likely affects pollinator visits and method of pollination. Taller plant heights significantly (P<0.02) increased outcrossing rates for 3 populations of common mullein in northeastern Georgia and southwestern North Carolina. Plants over 4.9 feet (1.5 m) tall experienced 21% more outcrossing than shorter plants [22]. Findings were similar for 6 common mullein populations near Kingston, Ontario. Significantly (P<0.0001) more pollen was deposited on tall plants with a median height of 5.6 feet (1.7 m) and an average of 13.5 flowers than on short plants with a median height of 2.6 feet (0.8 m) and an average of 5.5 flowers. Flowers at the top of an inflorescence also received significantly (P=0.0003) more pollen than flowers at the bottom [88]. Researchers in both studies concluded that taller plants attracted more pollinators than short ones [22,88].

Seed production: Common mullein produces abundant seed, and branching and fasciation of the flower stalk can lead to even greater seed production. In a 3-year-old abandoned field in Michigan, common mullein produced between 0 and 749 seeds/capsule for an average of 208 seeds/capsule. Total seeds per plant averaged 175,000 [52]. In 1- to 4-year-old fields in southwestern Michigan, common mullein averaged 100,000 seeds/plant [53]. An "average, well developed" common mullein plant in North Dakota, "growing with little competition" and sampled at a time when seed production was likely at a maximum, produced 223,200 seeds [127,128].

Studies have shown that common mullein rosettes must reach a minimum size before flowering. In a 4-year-old field in Kalamazoo County, Michigan, all rosettes greater than 6.1 inches (15.5 cm) in diameter flowered. In the greenhouse, however, rosettes beyond that size did not flower, suggesting a vernalization period may be necessary for flowering in temperate areas [49,54].

Branched inflorescences produced significantly (P<0.0001) more seeds than unbranched inflorescences in common mullein populations near Kingston, Ontario. The likelihood of branching increased significantly (P=0.0001) with plant height and decreased significantly (P=0.049) with population size. Branching was also associated with weevil damage. There was a significantly (P=0.0195) greater proportion of fruits damaged in branched plants [90].

While branching was affected by several factors, the reason for fasciation of common mullein spikes in Hawaii has not been determined. Ansari [7] found no difference between the prevalence of bacteria in normal and fasciated flowers, and physical damage to the flowering spike actually decreased fasciation rates. Evidence of single gene inheritance was also lacking, since there was no statistical difference in the prevalence of fasciation in normal and fasciated progeny [7]. Fasciated plants produced up to 3 times the seed of normal plants [33].

Seed dispersal: Common mullein seeds have no morphological adaptations for long-distance dispersal. Most seeds fall very near the parent plant [52,53]. Maximum dispersal distances of up to 36 feet (11 m) are possible, but the median dispersal distance is 3 feet (1 m) [52,54]. In natural settings, long-distance seed dispersal is rare. However, the long-lived common mullein seed bank makes transport of soil from areas where common mullein currently or historically occurred a potential long-distance dispersal event [16].

Seed banking: The common mullein seed bank is persistent. Seeds have germinated after 100 years or more in the soil [71,99]. The method used to determine seed bank composition and size, however, may affect common mullein seed bank findings. Seed bank estimates are much greater with the seedling emergence method than with the seed extraction method [19]. Seed bank estimates may also be affected by sample size and sample location. Because abundant common mullein seed is produced and dispersal is limited, soil samples collected near a site once occupied by a prolific parent plant could skew seed bank findings [52,53,73].

In Denmark, common mullein seed germinated from archaeological soil samples dated to 1300 AD [99]. In the late 1800s in Michigan, Dr. W J Beal buried seeds and soil in open jars about 3 feet (1 m) below the soil surface. Later jars were exhumed and germination of the soil samples was monitored in the greenhouse. Common mullein germinated from soil buried for 5, 15, 20, and 35 years [34]. Common mullein also germinated from soil buried 100 years [71]. In a similar study initiated by Dr Duvel in 1902, seeds were buried with soil in pots at increasing depths: 8 inches (20 cm), 22 inches (56 cm), and 42 inches (107 cm). Some common mullein seed germinated from all depths and from all periods tested between 1 and 21 years of burial. Germination percentages, however, were erratic and did not vary consistently with depth or length of burial [46]. After 39 years of burial, common mullein germination rates were 48% and 35% from 22 (56 cm)- and 42 (107 cm)-inch depths, respectively [133]. Seeds have also germinated at low percentages (3%) after 60 months in the water of Washington's Chandler Power Canal. Germination was much higher (82%) after 60 months of dry storage [28].

Methods of detection compared: Common mullein seed bank density estimates using the seed extraction method were much lower than those from the emergence method on soil samples collected in southern Ontario. Very small common mullein seeds were likely washed away or otherwise missed in the extraction method. Overall, the 2 methods provided very different pictures of the site's seed bank composition and density [19].

Frequency and density of common mullein seed in soil collected from a 2-year-old woodland clearcut in southern Ontario using extraction and emergence methods [19]
Method Frequency (%) Density
Seed extraction 6 87 seeds/m²
Seedling emergence 90 1,299 emergents/m²

Vegetation types compared: In most seed bank studies, common mullein was either absent or present at very low densities in the aboveground vegetation but still predominant in the seed bank. The common mullein seed bank can vary by vegetation type; however, patterns of variation are not consistent. It is likely that the soil area sampled and past land use are more important than current vegetation type. This idea is also discussed in Impacts and Control.

Common mullein seeds emerged from soil samples collected from 5 different vegetation types in the Mt Trumbull and Mt Logan Wilderness Areas of northern Arizona. Emergence was greatest from sites dominated by New Mexico locust (Robinia neomexicana) and lowest from sites dominated by old-growth ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa). Soil samples were collected in mid-September [123].

Common mullein seedling emergence from various vegetation types in northern Arizona [123]
Canopy type Old-growth ponderosa pine Dense, pole-sized ponderosa pine Gambel oak
(Quercus gambelii)
New Mexico locust Big sagebrush
(Artemisia tridentata)
Number of emergents/m² 23 917 158 4,267 396

On limestone soils in Pennsylvania, common mullein seedlings emerged from soil samples taken from prairie, ecotone, and deciduous forest types. Common mullein was not present in the aboveground vegetation but emerged from 7 of 20 prairie, 6 of 20 ecotone, and 2 of 20 forest soil samples [81]. In the southern Appalachians, common mullein did not emerge from soil samples taken from a floodplain dominated by sedges (Carex spp.) or from soils taken from an adjacent site dominated by sapling red maple (Acer rubrum). A single common mullein seedling germinated from soil collected in a closed-canopy red maple forest [114].

Shrub-steppe: On ungrazed to heavily grazed areas dominated by antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) in the Okanagen Valley of British Columbia, common mullein occurred with much greater density in aboveground vegetation than in the seed bank. Aboveground density was 65 plants/m², while seed bank density was 0.2 seeds/m² [26]. It is important to note that researchers used the seed extraction method to characterize the seed bank. This method has been shown to underestimate common mullein seed abundance [19].

Coniferous forest: From 47-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations in North Carolina, 840 common mullein seedlings/m² emerged from soil collections. The researcher noted that common mullein likely had not been present on the sites since canopy development [109]. The density of common mullein seedlings emerging from open-canopy ponderosa pine forests in northern Arizona was staggering. At depths up to 2 inches (5 cm), 4583 seedlings/m² emerged, and from 2- to 4-inch (5-10 cm) depths, 2,083 seedlings/m² emerged. Common mullein occurred in aboveground vegetation with an average frequency of 35% [3].

Deciduous forest: Common mullein seedlings emerged from soil collected in 6 of 8 deciduous forests in Tennessee's Anderson and Campbell counties. Stands were over 47 years old, and common mullein was not present in aboveground vegetation. Seedling density was greatest (93 seedlings/m²) in soil collected from yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)-dominated sites, and the greatest abundance of common mullein seedlings came from 2- to 4-inch (5-10 cm) depths [37]. In 70- to 90-year-old mixed deciduous stands in the Yale-Myers Forest of northeastern Connecticut, common mullein seedlings emerged from mineral soil samples taken from midslope (33/m²) and ridgetop (17/m²) positions but not from valley sites. Soil samples to were taken to a depth of 2 inches (5 cm) [9].

Germination: Light and warm temperatures produce the greatest common mullein germination rates; however, some germination is possible in the dark and at burial depths of 1.1 inches (3 cm). Common mullein seeds are either nondormant or conditionally dormant. Seed collected from temperate climates is typically not dormant when temperatures are cool, but as temperatures increase, seeds show conditional dormancy or a narrowed range of suitable conditions for germination  (Baskin and Baskin, cited in [12]).

Light, temperature and seed size: Common mullein seed germinates best with exposure to full light and warm temperatures, but several studies have shown that seeds exposed to cool or hot temperatures, drastically fluctuating temperatures, dark conditions, and very brief light exposure may also germinate. Soil disturbances can expose common mullein seeds to the light and increase germination. For more information, see Impacts and Control.

Seed size can also affect germination. Smaller common mullein seeds collected from old fields and roadsides of Michigan and Ohio had significantly (P<0.05) lower germination than medium and large seeds. Small seeds had the lowest and large seeds had the highest germination rates in both light and dark conditions [50].

Germination of small-, medium-, and large-sized common mullein seeds after 3 weeks in greenhouse [50]
Seed size Average seed weight (mg) Percent germination in light Percent germination in dark
Small 0.041 71.2% 19.2%
Medium 0.056 90.4% 26.4%
Large 0.070 92.8% 35.2%

Germination of common mullein seed is generally low in dark conditions, but increased temperatures may improve dark germination. In the laboratory, newly harvested common mullein seeds collected from the University of Michigan's Botanical Gardens germinated at over 90% in the light and about 2% in the dark. Older seeds were also light sensitive. When seeds were in soil or sand, germination in dark conditions was better, 24% to 34% [44]. No common mullein seeds collected from 2-year-old fields in southwestern Michigan germinated in the dark. However, germination increased to 38% after 5 seconds of light exposure; after 30 seconds of light exposure, germination increased to 63%, which was not statistically different from germination in full light [51]. Temperature affected successful germination in a dark germinator. Germination was very low in sustained cold temperatures but increased some when fluctuating temperatures reached highs of 68 °F (20 °C) or more [101]. When controlled studies were conducted on common mullein seed collected from low- and high-elevation roadside sites in western Nevada and northern California, germination percentages reached a high of 98% in the dark at alternating warm temperatures of 77 and 95 °F (25/35 °C). In the light, common mullein seed germinated at constant 104 °F (40 °C) and at alternating 0 and 104 °F (0/40 °C) temperatures [120].

Using field and greenhouse studies, researchers concluded that common mullein seed germination is possible throughout most of the year in light conditions. Seed was collected in early September from Wilson County, Tennessee, buried under 2.8 inches (7 cm) of soil in Lexington, Kentucky, for 1 to 25 months, and exhumed at monthly intervals. Germination rates of fresh-harvested seed were 0% at alternating temperatures of 56 °F and 43 °F (15/6 °C), 8% at 68/50 °F (20/10 °C), 97% at 86/56 °F (30/15 °C), and 95% at 95/68 °F (35/20 °C). Germination rates varied with season. Seeds removed in the winter had lower temperature requirements for germination. At high temperatures, 10% of seeds germinated in dark conditions, while none germinated in the dark at low temperatures [13].

Burial/canopy cover: Common mullein seed germinates best on the soil surface in areas with low canopy cover. Germination success generally decreases with increased depth of burial and increased canopy cover.

Emergence of common mullein in established Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) was significantly lower than emergence in litter or bare soil (P<0.0001). In litter or bare soil, emergence of common mullein was rapid and synchronous, and nearly 50% of maximum emergence occurred within 15 days of being sown [50]. Seed collected from 2-year-old fields in southwestern Michigan germinated at much lower percentages under a simulated canopy than under full light conditions [51]. After 2,500 seeds were sown in 1-year-old, 5-year-old, and 15-year-old fields at the W K Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan, common mullein emergence was greatest in 1-year-old fields with the greatest amount of bare ground. Survival of seedlings was evaluated in 1-year-old and 15-year-old fields; results are presented in Seedling establishment/growth below [53,54].

Seedling emergence with increasing field age and decreasing bare ground availability [53,54]
Field age Percentage of bare ground Number of seedlings emerged
1 year 66 20.85a
5 years 10.8 6.3b
15 years <1 2.75b
Emergence values followed by different letters are significantly different (P<0.05)

Factors other than darkness associated with burial may prevent germination. Using field and greenhouse studies, researchers found that fewer common mullein seeds germinated in the dark at spring temperatures after 2 years of burial than after 1 year of burial [13]. Common mullein seeds collected from northern California roadsides and tested in a greenhouse study germinated better under a litter layer than under a soil layer, and increasing depth of burial corresponded to decreased germination percentages [120].

Percentage of common mullein germination with increasing depth of burial [120]
Burial depth (cm) Seed source
Sierra County, CA Lassen County, CA Donner Summit, CA
Elevation: 1,510 m
Mean annual precipitation: 625 mm
Elevation: 1,380 m
Mean annual precipitation: 300 mm
Elevation: 2,190 m
Mean annual precipitation: 1,000 mm
Surface 53ab 68a 58b
0.1 25c 21bc 10cd
0.5 17cd 24b 8cd
1.0 7cd 10bc 5cd
2.0 6cd 8bc 1d
3.0 7cd 0c 3d
4.0 0d 0c 0d
On top of litter 71a 72a 84a
Under 1 cm litter 46b 27b 24c
Means within a column followed by different letters are significantly (P<0.05) different.

Seedling establishment/growth: Predictions regarding common mullein's survival and flowering success can be made by measuring its rosette size. Successful establishment and rosette size are affected by site conditions and the availability of open sites.

Probability of common mullein survival and flowering generally increase as rosette size increases. In 4-year-old fields in Kalamazoo, Michigan, rosettes less than 3.5 inches (9 cm) in diameter failed to flower in the subsequent year, but all those greater than 16 inches (41 cm) flowered. Of the 1,006 plants studied, very few survived more than 2 years, and none survived more than 3 years [49]. Probability of dying or not flowering was greatest for small-sized rosettes in 24 common mullein populations from southern Canada, North Carolina, Texas, and Georgia. Very large rosettes over 28 inches (70 cm) in diameter also had a lower probability of survival than those of intermediate diameter. As latitude of the population increased, so did the likelihood that plants with small rosettes would remain vegetative (P<0.001) [110]. Findings were similar on Mauna Kea in Hawaii. Common mullein's probability of dying without flowering decreased and probability of flowering increased with increasing rosette size, which was typically greatest at the highest elevation sites. Rosettes over 10 inches (25.5 cm) in diameter had a 0.08 probability of dying, a 0.15 probability of remaining vegetative, and a 0.77 probability of flowering [7].

Emergence timing may or may not affect common mullein germination, rosette size, flowering, or survival. At sites ranging from 5,540 to 8,860 feet (1,690-2,700 m) elevation on Mauna Kea, common mullein survival and reproductive success were not affected by timing of cohort emergence [7], but timing of cohort emergence was critical to common mullein's survival and reproductive success in southwestern Michigan [48]. The fate of more than 7,000 common mullein seedlings was monitored for 3 years on the island of Hawaii. There were 4 emergence cohorts, but timing of emergence did not affect germination, rosette size, flowering, or survival. Some variation appeared to be related to elevation. Seedling density, rosette diameter, and leaf number were greater at high-elevation sites than at low-elevation sites, which had greater precipitation and more associated vegetation. However, probability of flowering was greatest at the lowest elevation sites. The proportion of plants that delayed flowering beyond 2 years of age was greatest at high-elevation sites [7].

Common mullein seedlings emerged in mid-May, mid-June, and mid-August, generally after 3 to 4 days of rain, in a 3-year-old field at Michigan's W K Kellogg Biological Station. None of the seedlings that emerged in August, the largest cohort, survived the winter. When neighboring vegetation was removed, survival increased [48].

Fate of common mullein plants with timing of emergence in a 3-year-old field in Michigan [48]
Cohort Number of seedlings Probability of surviving winter Number of flowering plants Mean height of flowering plants (cm) Mean number of seeds/plant Overall probability of reproducing
May 116 0.50 4 92.1 2,050 0.035
June 2,640 0.75 6 38.1 380 0.003
August 29,060 0 0 0 0 0.000

Open site availability: Like seed germination, common mullein seedling establishment is best on open sites. Time since disturbance and its relationship to open-site availability affects seedling size, survival, and reproductive success. Seedling growth was dramatically lower when seeds were sown in containers with established Kentucky bluegrass than when planted in litter or bare soil [50].

Final average dry mass (mg) of common mullein seedlings* in containers with bare soil, litter, or established Kentucky bluegrass [50]
Bare soil Litter Kentucky bluegrass Kentucky bluegrass and litter
874-1,013 1,003-1,147 0.07-0.22 0.09-0.16
*First number is average for seedlings from small-sized seeds; last number is average for seedlings from large-sized seeds.

In southwestern Michigan, common mullein seedlings established and survived only in 1-year-old fields when seeds were sown in 1- and 15-year-old fields. Seedlings that survived to the end of the growing season (~20 weeks) on 1-year-old fields were restricted to bare areas. When openings were created in 15-year-old fields, seedling emergence increased and some seedlings established [53,54].

Decreased germination, lower survival, and delayed reproduction were typical in common mullein populations in North Carolina's Piedmont as time since disturbance increased. Common mullein seedlings that established 2 to 3 years after a disturbance had a greater chance of remaining vegetative in their 2nd year than those established in the 1st postdisturbance year. When areas were artificially disturbed, seedlings had a high probability of flowering in their 2nd year. The researcher concluded that the "successional age of the habitat determined the relative fitness of the biennial and triennial plants" [112].

Seedling density and seedling survival with increasing time since disturbance. Ranges include information from 2 to 6 common mullein populations [112]
Time since disturbance (years) 1 2 3
Seedlings/m² 98.9-127.6 0-14.1 0-3.8
Fraction of seed pool germinating (%) 11.2-26.6 0-2.9 0-0.02
Seedlings surviving to end of 1st growing season (%) 14.9-17.8 0-2.5 0-7.1

Vegetative regeneration: Common mullein has no means of vegetative regeneration [48].

  • 10. Bare, Janet E. 1979. Wildflowers and weeds of Kansas. Lawrence, KS: The Regents Press of Kansas. 509 p. [3801]
  • 12. Baskin, Carol C.; Baskin, Jerry M. 2001. Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 666 p. [60775]
  • 28. Comes, R. D.; Bruns, V. F.; Kelley, A. D. 1978. Longevity of certain weed and crop seeds in fresh water. Weed Science. 26(4): 336-344. [50697]
  • 3. Abella, Scott R.; Springer, Judith D.; Covington, W. Wallace. 2007. Seed banks of an Arizona Pinus ponderosa landscape: responses to environmental gradients and fire cues. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 37: 552-567. [67962]
  • 7. Ansari, Shahin. 2007. Life history variation, population dynamics, and impact of the introduced weed mullein (Verbascum thapsus) on the island of Hawai'i. Manoa, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa. 292 p. Dissertation. [69409]
  • 9. Ashton, P. M. S.; Harris, P. G.; Thadani, R. 1998. Soil seed bank dynamics in relation to topographic position of a mixed-deciduous forest in southern New England, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 111: 15-22. [29228]
  • 13. Baskin, Jerry M.; Baskin, Carol C. 1981. Seasonal changes in germination responses of buried seeds of Verbascum thapsus and Verbascum blattaria and ecological implications. Canadian Journal of Botany. 59(9): 1796-1775. [69375]
  • 16. Bossard, Carla C.; Randall, John M.; Hoshovsky, Marc C., eds. 2000. Invasive plants of California's wildlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 360 p. [38054]
  • 19. Brown, Doug. 1992. Estimating the composition of a forest seed bank: a comparison of the seed extraction and seedling emergence methods. Canadian Journal of Botany. 70(8): 1603-1612. [69376]
  • 22. Carromero, W.; Hamrick, J. L. 2005. The mating system of Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae): The effect of plant height. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 166(6): 979-983. [69366]
  • 26. Clements, David R.; Krannitz, Pam G.; Gillespie, Shauna M. 2007. Seed bank responses to grazing history by invasive and native plant species in a semi-desert shrub-steppe environment. Northwest Science. 81(1): 37-49. [67241]
  • 33. Daehler, Curtis C. 2005. Upper-montane plant invasions in the Hawaiian Islands: patterns and opportunities. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 7(3): 203-216. [69378]
  • 34. Darlington, H. T.; Steinbauer, G. P. 1961. The eighty-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. American Journal of Botany. 48: 321-325. [70325]
  • 37. Dobberpuhl, J. 1980. Seed banks of forest soils in east Tennessee. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee. 219 p. Thesis. [46755]
  • 39. Donnelly, Sarah E.; Lortie, Christopher J.; Aarssen, Lonnie W. 1998. Pollination in Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae): The advantage of being tall. American Journal of Botany. 85(11): 1618-1625. [69367]
  • 44. Gardener, Wright A. 1921. Effect of light on germination of light-sensitive seeds. Botanical Gazette. 71(4): 249-288. [69405]
  • 46. Goss, W. L. 1924. The vitality of buried seeds. Journal of Agricultural Research. 29(7): 349-362. [35541]
  • 48. Gross, Katherine L. 1980. Colonization by Verbascum thapsus (mullein) of an old-field in Michigan- experiments on the effects of vegetation. Journal of Ecology. 68(3): 919-927. [69385]
  • 49. Gross, Katherine L. 1981. Predictions of fate from rosette size in 4 "biennial" plant species: Verbascum thapsus, Oenothera biennis, Daucus carota, and Tragopogon dubius. Oecologia. 48(2): 209-213. [69384]
  • 50. Gross, Katherine L. 1984. Effects of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of six monocarpic perennial plants. Journal of Ecology. 72(2): 369-387. [69407]
  • 51. Gross, Katherine L. 1985. Effects of irradiance and spectral quality on the germination of Verbascum thapsus L. and Oenothera biennis L. seeds. New Phytologist. 101(3): 531-541. [69382]
  • 52. Gross, Katherine L.; Werner, Patricia A. 1978. Biology of Canadian Weeds. 28. Verbascum thapsus L. and Verbascum blattaria L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 58(2): 401-413. [69386]
  • 53. Gross, Katherine L.; Werner, Patricia A. 1982. Colonizing abilities of "biennial" plant species in relation to ground cover: implications for their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology. 63(4): 921-931. [12143]
  • 54. Gross, Katherine Lynn. 1980. Ecological consequences of differences in life history charactereistics among four "biennial" plant species. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. 120 p. Dissertation. [70381]
  • 71. Kivilaan, A.; Bandurski, Robert S. 1981. The one hundred-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. American Journal of Botany. 68(9): 1290-1292. [69403]
  • 73. Korb, Julie E.; Springer, Judith D.; Powers, Stephanie R.; Moore, Margaret M. 2005. Soil seed banks in Pinus ponderosa forests in Arizona: clues to site history and restoration potential. Applied Vegetation Science. 8: 103-112. [68811]
  • 81. Laughlin, Daniel C. 2003. Lack of native propagules in a Pennsylvania, USA, limestone prairie seed bank: futile hopes for a role in ecological restoration. Natural Areas Journal. 23(2): 158-164. [44593]
  • 88. Lortie, Christopher J.; Aarssen, Lonnie W. 1999. The advantage of being tall: higher flowers receive more pollen in Verbascum thapsus L. (Scrophulariaceae). Ecoscience. 6(1): 68-71. [69390]
  • 90. Lortie, Christopher J.; Aarssen, Lonnie W. 2000. Fitness consequences of branching in Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany. 87(12): 1793-1796. [69369]
  • 99. Odum, Soren. 1965. Germination of ancient seeds: Floristical observations and experiments with archaeologically dated soil samples. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv. 24(2): 1-70. [70326]
  • 101. Palmquist, Debra E.; Evans, Raymond A.; Young, James A. 1987. Comparative analysis of temperature-germination response surfaces. In: Frasier, Gary W.; Evans, Raymond A., eds. Seed and seedbed ecology of rangeland plants: proceedings of symposium; 1987 April 21-23; Tucson, AZ. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service: 97-103. [3954]
  • 109. Reinartz, James A. 1981. Biomass partitioning, life history, and population dynamics of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus L.). Durham, NC: Duke University. 178 p. Abstract. Dissertation. [69412]
  • 110. Reinartz, James A. 1984. Life history variation of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus) I. Latitudinal differences in population dynamics and timing of reproduction. Journal of Ecology. 72(3): 897-912. [69394]
  • 112. Reinartz, James A. 1984. Life history variation of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus). III. Differences among sequential cohorts. Journal of Ecology. 72: 927-936. [16215]
  • 114. Rossell, Irene M.; Wells, Carolyn L. 1999. The seed banks of a southern Appalachian fen and an adjacent degraded wetland. The Society of Wetland Scientists. 19(2): 365-371. [41770]
  • 120. Semenza, R. J.; Young, J. A.; Evans, R. A. 1978. Influence of light and temperature on germination and seedbed ecology of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus). Weed Science. 26(6): 577-581. [69397]
  • 123. Springer, Judith D. 1999. Soil seed bank in southwestern ponderosa pine: implications for ecological restoration. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University. 103 p. Thesis. [44467]
  • 127. Stevens, O. A. 1932. The number and weight of seeds produced by weeds. American Journal of Botany. 19: 784-794. [47817]
  • 128. Stevens, O. A. 1957. Weights of seeds and numbers per plant. Weeds. 5: 46-55. [44071]
  • 133. Toole, E. H.; Brown, E. 1946. Final results of the Duvel buried seed experiment. Journal of Agricultural Research. 72: 201-210. [70349]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Growth Form (according to Raunkiær Life-form classification)

More info on this topic.

More info for the term: hemicryptophyte

RAUNKIAER [107] LIFE FORM:
Hemicryptophyte
  • 107. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life Form

More info for the term: forb

Forb

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Fire Management Considerations

Fire is generally not used to control common mullein. While fire does kill common mullein plants, it also creates open sites that are prime habitat for seedling emergence [16]. Given a seed source, common mullein establishment on burned sites is nearly guaranteed. Some seed survival on burned sites is likely [63].
  • 16. Bossard, Carla C.; Randall, John M.; Hoshovsky, Marc C., eds. 2000. Invasive plants of California's wildlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 360 p. [38054]
  • 63. Hunter, Molly E.; Omi, Philip N. 2006. Seed supply of native and cultivated grasses in pine forests of the southwestern United States and the potential for vegetation recovery following wildfire. Plant Ecology. 183: 1-8. [62623]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Immediate Effect of Fire

Fire kills common mullein plants [16].
  • 16. Bossard, Carla C.; Randall, John M.; Hoshovsky, Marc C., eds. 2000. Invasive plants of California's wildlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 360 p. [38054]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Cyclicity

Flowering and fruiting: March-July
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© India Biodiversity Portal

Source: India Biodiversity Portal

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Phenology

More info on this topic.

More info for the term: vernalization

Common mullein rosettes often remain green through the winter [64]. Plants on a south-facing slope in Colorado's Gregory Canyon had high photosynthetic rates when leaves were sampled from 10 to 22 January [4]. Flower stalks often persist through the winter [64].

Southern common mullein populations flowered earlier and longer than northern populations when 24 populations from southern Canada, North Carolina, Texas, and Georgia were studied. A vernalization period was not required in southern populations [110].

Timing of common mullein development by state or region
State/region Timing of reproductive development
Arizona, north-central flowers mid-July to mid-September, seeds mid-October [25]
California flowers June-September [97]
Florida reproductive season summer-fall; flowers as early as June, fruits by September [27,153]
Illinois flowers May-September [96]
Kansas flowers June-September [10]
Nevada flowers June-September [66]
New York (Adirondack Uplands) flowers July-August [75
North and South Carolina flowers June-September [106]
Texas flowers May-July, rarely later [36]
Virginia flowers June-September [130]
Atlantic and Gulf coasts flowers March-November [41]
Blue Ridge Province flowers June-September [150
Eastern United States flowers June-September [45]
Great Plains flowers June-July [47]
Intermountain West flowers June-July [30]
New England flowers middle July-middle August [121]
Canada flowering begins late June, tall stalks may flower into late September, October [52]
Nova Scotia flowers July-August [113]
  • 10. Bare, Janet E. 1979. Wildflowers and weeds of Kansas. Lawrence, KS: The Regents Press of Kansas. 509 p. [3801]
  • 45. Gleason, Henry A.; Cronquist, Arthur. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York: New York Botanical Garden. 910 p. [20329]
  • 97. Munz, Philip A.; Keck, David D. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
  • 150. Wofford, B. Eugene. 1989. Guide to the vascular plants of the Blue Ridge. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press. 384 p. [12908]
  • 47. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 4. Adams, W. W., III; Demmig-Adams, B.; Tosenstiel, T. N.; Brightwell, A. K.; Ebbert, V. 2002. Photosynthesis and photoprotection in overwintering plants. Plant Biology. 4(5): 545-557. [69373]
  • 25. Clary, Warren P.; Kruse, William H. 1979. Phenology and rate of height growth of some forbs in the southwestern ponderosa pine type. Res. Note RM-376. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 8 p. [644]
  • 27. Clewell, Andre F. 1985. Guide to the vascular plants of the Florida Panhandle. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University Press. 605 p. [13124]
  • 30. Cronquist, Arthur; Holmgren, Arthur H.; Holmgren, Noel H.; Reveal, James L.; Holmgren, Patricia K. 1984. Intermountain flora: Vascular plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. 4: Subclass Asteridae, (except Asteraceae). New York: The New York Botanical Garden. 573 p. [718]
  • 36. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany, No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 41. Duncan, Wilbur H.; Duncan, Marion B. 1987. The Smithsonian guide to seaside plants of the Gulf and Atlantic coasts from Louisiana to Massachusetts, exclusive of lower peninsular Florida. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. 409 p. [12906]
  • 52. Gross, Katherine L.; Werner, Patricia A. 1978. Biology of Canadian Weeds. 28. Verbascum thapsus L. and Verbascum blattaria L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 58(2): 401-413. [69386]
  • 64. Johnson, James R.; Nichols, James T. 1970. Plants of South Dakota grasslands: A photographic study. Bull. 566. Brookings, SD: South Dakota State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. 163 p. [18483]
  • 75. Kudish, Michael. 1992. Adirondack upland flora: an ecological perspective. Saranac, NY: The Chauncy Press. 320 p. [19376]
  • 106. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606]
  • 110. Reinartz, James A. 1984. Life history variation of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus) I. Latitudinal differences in population dynamics and timing of reproduction. Journal of Ecology. 72(3): 897-912. [69394]
  • 113. Roland, A. E.; Smith, E. C. 1969. The flora of Nova Scotia. Halifax, NS: Nova Scotia Museum. 746 p. [13158]
  • 121. Seymour, Frank Conkling. 1982. The flora of New England. 2nd ed. Phytologia Memoirs 5. Plainfield, NJ: Harold N. Moldenke and Alma L. Moldenke. 611 p. [7604]
  • 130. Strausbaugh, P. D.; Core, Earl L. 1977. Flora of West Virginia. 2nd ed. Morgantown, WV: Seneca Books, Inc. 1079 p. [23213]
  • 153. Wunderlin, Richard P.; Hansen, Bruce F. 2003. Guide to the vascular plants of Florida. 2nd edition. Gainesville, FL: The University of Florida Press. 787 p. [69433]
  • 96. Mohlenbrock, Robert H. 1986. [Revised edition]. Guide to the vascular flora of Illinois. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 507 p. [17383]
  • 66. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 2 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Flowering from June to August; fruiting from July to October.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Wen, Jun

Source: Plants of Tibet

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

Biology and Spread

During the first summer after germination mullein produces a tap root and a rosette of leaves. During this vegetative stage, the rosette increases in size during the growing season until low temperatures arrest growth sometime during the autumn and winter. Beginning the next spring, second year plants bolt into maturity, flower, produce seed during the summer, and then die, completing the plant’s normal life cycle. Flowers mature from the base to the tip of the stalk. The length of the flowering period is a function of stalk height; longer stalks can continue to flower into early October. It is estimated that a single plant can produce 100,000-180,000 seeds which may remain viable for more than 100 years. The seeds are dispersed mechanically near the parent plant during the autumn and winter. Seeds at or near the surface are more likely to germinate.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

U.S. National Park Service Weeds Gone Wild website

Source: U.S. National Park Service

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Genetics

The chromosomal number of Verbascum thapsus is 2n = 36 (Hill, 1989; Wentworth et al., 1991; Lövkvist and Hultgård, 1999).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Wen, Jun

Source: Plants of Tibet

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Verbascum thapsus

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 10
Specimens with Barcodes: 24
Species With Barcodes: 1
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

Information on state-level noxious weed status of plants in the United States is available at Plants Database.

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National NatureServe Conservation Status

Canada

Rounded National Status Rank: NNA - Not Applicable

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: NNA - Not Applicable

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: GNR - Not Yet Ranked

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Impacts and Control

More info for the terms: capsule, cover, density, fire management, forbs, invasive species, litter, natural, nonnative species, presence, restoration, root crown, shrubs, succession

Impacts: In many areas and vegetation types, common mullein is a short-lived member of disturbed communities whose abundance decreases with increased time since disturbance. In 1999 the California Invasive Plant Council listed common mullein as a "wildland pest plant of lesser invasiveness" because its spread and degree of habitat disruption were less than the area's other pest plants [20]. As of 2004, a Forest Service report lists common mullein as a widespread nonnative species that is generally restricted to disturbed sites and not especially invasive in undisturbed habitats in the eastern United States [138]. However, in parts of California and in Hawaii, common mullein may form dense and persistent populations [7,16,31,144].

In moist meadows and drainages of California's Mono Lake and Owens Valley, common mullein populations can be abundant. Common mullein has also colonized intact and undisturbed meadows in this area. In the western Sierra Nevada, common mullein establishes almost immediately following fire. Although common mullein is eventually replaced by regenerating shrubs, it may restrict the establishment of native early-seral forbs and grasses and disrupt normal succession in the Sierra Nevada [16].

High density common mullein populations are common in Hawaii. Common mullein has colonized habitats from near sea level to near the Mauna Kea summit at 15,080 feet (4,600 m) [7,33]. As of a 1990 review, common mullein occupied over 2,000 km² area. Densities as high as 190 plants/100 m² have been reported on disturbed areas of Mauna Kea, although common mullein is also widely established and often abundant and persistent in relatively undisturbed subalpine grasslands dominated by alpine hairgrass (Deschampsia nubigena), subalpine woodlands dominated by ohia lehua (Metrosideros polymorpha), and in alpine desert communities [7,31,144]. Common mullein plants in Hawaii frequently form an odd-shaped, fasciated inflorescence capable of seed production 3 times that of normal flowers (Daehler, unpublished data, cited in [33]).

Common mullein is also considered disruptive to the recruitment of native flora in Hawaii [33]. In subalpine vegetation on Mauna Kea, removal of common mullein from experimental plots increased the cover of all grasses. Mauna Kea subalpine vegetation is species poor, and there are abundant bare sites. Grass cover was significantly greater (P<0.05) on sites where common mullein and associated litter were removed for all 3 years of the study. However, cover of forbs was lower in treatment plots, and by the third year of the study, forbs were significantly (P<0.05) lower on plots without common mullein. The presence of common mullein may have altered natural competitive interactions between grasses and forbs in this area [7]. Juvik and Juvik (as cited in [31]) suggest that grazing by feral sheep and goats in areas of Hawaii may have facilitated the establishment, spread, and persistence of common mullein in niches once occupied by the endangered Hawaii silversword (Argyroxiphium sandwicense subsp. sandwicense). Feral sheep and goats likely avoided common mullein in favor of other more palatable forage [31].

Control: Minimizing disturbances may be the most effective and economical method of common mullein control. Limiting open sites restricts common mullein's success. However, the very long-lived seed bank suggests that eradication of common mullein is unlikely, and even minimal disturbances may encourage common mullein establishment. In many areas, common mullein populations do not persist and abundance is dramatically reduced as time since disturbance increases. Potential control methods are discussed below.

Prevention: As a biennial species with a persistent seed bank, common mullein is adapted for widespread dispersal through time. The sudden appearance of common mullein is likely after disturbances expose buried seeds to light [13]. High levels of germination are possible in a wide range of temperatures, and germination percentages can be increased by 38% after only 5 seconds of light exposure [51].

Given the long-lived seed bank and wide range occupied by common mullein, transportion of soil may introduce or encourage common mullein establishment. Common mullein seedlings emerged from soil collected in a wetland constructed by a Department of Transportation mitigation project on New Jersey's Delaware River but did not emerge from soil taken from preexisting, nearby natural marshes [85].

Increased levels and frequencies of disturbances may increase the density of the common mullein seed bank. In northern Arizona, the density of common mullein seedlings emerging from soil samples increased with increased levels of past land use. There were 940 seedlings/m² in high disturbance areas and 566 seedlings/m² from areas with more moderate levels of disturbance [73].

Physical/mechanical: Physical control methods may be an effective method of removing small aboveground common mullein populations. Plants severed through the root crown below the basal leaves do not sprout [16]. Flowering stalks should be removed from the site to limit additions to the seed bank. In greenhouse experiments, common mullein did not survive defoliation in low-nitrogen environments [140].

Fire: See Fire Management Considerations.

Biological: There have been no purposeful introductions of common mullein biological control agents. In Europe, common mullein is most negatively affected by weevils (Gymnaetron tetrum) and mullein moths (Cucullia verbasci) [93]. Weevils were accidentally introduced in North America. Weevils can destroy all seeds within a capsule but rarely infest all capsules. Weevils may destroy up to 50% of common mullein seeds [16].

Chemical: Egler [42] reports that first year rosettes are easily killed by herbicide but that second year plants are more resistant. However, a review reports that common mullein's extreme hairiness reduces the effectiveness of herbicides. Aiming herbicides directly into the center of the rosette may increase herbicide effectiveness [16].

Integrated management: In the available literature, there was little mention of integrated management methods for common mullein. In a review by Reed [108], guidelines are provided for limiting the establishment and evaluating the potential impacts of nonnative and/or invasive species in restoration projects. Reed presents plans to limit and prepare for potential weedy species establishment as well as decision-making guidelines on whether to actively manage the weeds.

  • 7. Ansari, Shahin. 2007. Life history variation, population dynamics, and impact of the introduced weed mullein (Verbascum thapsus) on the island of Hawai'i. Manoa, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa. 292 p. Dissertation. [69409]
  • 13. Baskin, Jerry M.; Baskin, Carol C. 1981. Seasonal changes in germination responses of buried seeds of Verbascum thapsus and Verbascum blattaria and ecological implications. Canadian Journal of Botany. 59(9): 1796-1775. [69375]
  • 16. Bossard, Carla C.; Randall, John M.; Hoshovsky, Marc C., eds. 2000. Invasive plants of California's wildlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 360 p. [38054]
  • 31. Cuddihy, Linda W.; Stone, Charles P. 1990. Alteration of native Hawaiian vegetation: Effects of humans, their activities and introductions. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit. 138 p. [40613]
  • 33. Daehler, Curtis C. 2005. Upper-montane plant invasions in the Hawaiian Islands: patterns and opportunities. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 7(3): 203-216. [69378]
  • 51. Gross, Katherine L. 1985. Effects of irradiance and spectral quality on the germination of Verbascum thapsus L. and Oenothera biennis L. seeds. New Phytologist. 101(3): 531-541. [69382]
  • 73. Korb, Julie E.; Springer, Judith D.; Powers, Stephanie R.; Moore, Margaret M. 2005. Soil seed banks in Pinus ponderosa forests in Arizona: clues to site history and restoration potential. Applied Vegetation Science. 8: 103-112. [68811]
  • 85. Leck, Mary Allessio; Leck, Charles F. 2005. Vascular plants of a Delaware River tidal freshwater wetland and adjacent terrestrial areas: seed bank and vegetation comparisons of reference and constructed marshes and annotated species list. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 132(2): 323-354. [60627]
  • 144. Wagner, Warren L.; Herbst, Derral R.; Sohmer, S. H., eds. 1999. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai'i, Revised edition. Volume 2. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press. 989-1918. [70168]
  • 42. Egler, Frank E. 1949. Herbicide effects in Connecticut vegetation, 1948. Ecology. 30(2): 248-256. [60965]
  • 93. Maw, M. G. 1980. Cucullia verbasci an agent for the biological control of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus). Weed Science. 28(1): 27-30. [69391]
  • 108. Reed, Catherine C. 2004. Keeping invasive plants out of restorations. Ecological Restoration. 22(3): 210-216. [50456]
  • 140. Verkaar, H. J.; van der Meijden, E.; Breebaart, L. 1986. The responses of Cynoglossum officinale L. and Verbascum thapsus L. to defoliation in relation to nitrogen supply. The New Phytologist. 104(1): 121-129. [41360]
  • 20. California Invasive Plant Council. 1999. The CalEPPC list: Exotic pest plants of greatest ecological concern in California, [Online]. California Exotic Pest Plant Council (Producer). Available: http://groups.ucanr.org/ceppc/1999_Cal-IPC_list [2004, December 3]. [50172]
  • 138. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Eastern Region. 2004. Eastern Region invasive plants ranked by degree of invasiveness, [Online]. In: Noxious weeds and non-native invasive plants. Section 3: Invasive plants. Milwaukee, WI: Eastern Region (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/wildlife/range/weed/Sec3B.htm [2004, February 16]. [46748]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems

Benefits

Other uses and values

More info for the term: formation

European cultures had a variety of uses for common mullein. These many uses likely encouraged the early transport and introduction of this species into nonnative areas. Parker [103] has aptly called common mullein "a waif of civilization". In as early as the 4th century BC, yellow common mullein flowers were used to dye hair [64]. Romans dipped flowering stalks in tallow and used them as torches [66]. In a review of folk medicine, common mullein was said to be used to treat respiratory disorders such as asthma, tuberculosis, bronchitis, and pneumonia; to combat tumor formation; and to treat urinary tract infections and skin diseases. Hemorrhoids, diarrhea, warts, migraines, frost bite, and ringworm were also treated with common mullein [137]. In Europe, concoctions of common mullein leaves and roots were used to treat many respiratory and alimentary conditions [10].

Native Americans also utilized common mullein. Southwestern tribes, including the Hopi, smoked dried common mullein leaves and flowers with giant-trumpets (Macromeria viridiflora) or other plants to treat mental illness [66,67]. Potawatomis, Mohegans, Penobscots, and Menominess smoked dried common mullein leaves to treat colds, bronchitis, and asthma. Catawbas made a cough syrup from boiled common mullein roots, and a poultice of mashed leaves was used to relieve bruises, wounds, and sprains. Choctaws used a poultice of leaves for headaches [10].

Early European settlers in the eastern United States used common mullein seed to sting or poison fish. Common mullein seeds were crushed and put into diked areas of slow moving water. Fish breathing was severely reduced or stopped by the toxic seeds. Fish "stings" were an easy method of food collection and often turned into community events. Sometime before the Revolutionary War, common mullein seeds were brought from Europe and cultivated for this purpose [148]. Colonial women rubbed common mullein leaves on their cheeks to redden them [146].

Today common mullein is one of several plants used in herbal ear drops used to treat earaches in children (>5 years) [119]. Common mullein leaves and flowers, capsules, alcohol extracts, and flower oil are available for medicinal use in the United States, and a recent (2002) study of common mullein extracts revealed antibacterial and antitumor properties [136,137]. In a Northwest floral guide, basal common mullein leaves are noted as potential insoles for weary hikers [104].

  • 10. Bare, Janet E. 1979. Wildflowers and weeds of Kansas. Lawrence, KS: The Regents Press of Kansas. 509 p. [3801]
  • 64. Johnson, James R.; Nichols, James T. 1970. Plants of South Dakota grasslands: A photographic study. Bull. 566. Brookings, SD: South Dakota State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. 163 p. [18483]
  • 67. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 104. Pojar, Jim; MacKinnon, Andy, eds. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest coast: Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska. Redmond, WA: Lone Pine Publishing. 526 p. [25159]
  • 148. Wilhelm, Gene, Jr. 1974. The mullein: plant piscicide of the mountain folk culture. The Geographical Review. 64: 235-252. [70320]
  • 103. Parker, Karl G. 1975. Some important Utah range plants. Extension Service Bulletin EC-383. Logan, UT: Utah State University. 174 p. [9878]
  • 119. Sarrell, E. Michael; Cohen, Herman Avner; Kahan, Ernesto. 2003. Naturopathic treatment for ear pain in children. Pediatrics. 111(5): E574-E579. [69396]
  • 136. Turker, Arzu Ucar; Camper, N. D. 2002. Biological activity of common mullein, a medicinal plant. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 82(2-3): 117-125. [69399]
  • 137. Turker, Arzu Ucar; Gurel, Ekrem. 2005. Common mullein (Verbascum thapsus L.): recent advances in research. Phytotherapy Research. 19(9): 733-739. [69398]
  • 146. Weber, William A.; Wittmann, Ronald C. 1996. Colorado flora: eastern slope. 2nd ed. Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado. 524 p. [27572]
  • 66. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 2 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Importance to Livestock and Wildlife

More info for the terms: cover, density, relative density

Deer, elk, mountain goats, and small mammals feed on common mullein. Deer and elk primarily utilize common mullein in the winter. Domestic grazing animals typically do not consume common mullein unless other forage is unavailable.

Elk and deer: Common mullein can be important in elk and deer winter diets. In South Dakota, researchers observed elk feeding on dry common mullein leaves when other forage was unavailable [64]. On the Threemile winter range in western Montana, the highest average relative density of common mullein in elk feces was 16.1% in January collections. Amounts of common mullein were much lower (0-2.2%) in December, February, March, and April [82].

On the Los Alamos National Laboratory in north-central New Mexico, common mullein was a predominant forage for deer in the winter and for elk in the fall and winter. Although common mullein had only trace cover in the study area, it made up 9% of elk and 7% of deer diets for all seasons evaluated over a 2-year period. Common mullein was 12% and 14% of fall and winter elk diets, respectively, and 17% of winter deer diets [117].

In Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Texas, researchers listed common mullein as 1 of 12 major mule deer food plants, although its average relative density was 1% of the annual diets [74]. On the Calf Creek winter range in western Montana, the greatest average relative density of common mullein was 2.5% in mule deer feces collections [82]. White-tailed deer in Michigan's Wilderness State Park defoliated common mullein rapidly after the first snow when the Park was near or over carrying capacity and winter food was "approaching a critical stage". White-tailed deer consumed common mullein leaves and chewed some flowering stalks [60].

Mountain goats: On Chopaka Mountain in north-central Washington, the high relative density of common mullein was 1.5% in summer-collected fecal samples. Over the 3-year period, the relative density of common mullein was lower, 0.1% to 0.3% in fall, winter, and spring samples. Mule deer or cattle fecal samples collected over a 2-year period contained no common mullein [21].

Small mammals: Common mullein is likely a food source for small mammals throughout its range, but studies and observations are generally lacking. In South Dakota, common mullein seeds and fruits provide food for chipmunks, prairie dogs, and other small mammals [64,69]. In Wind Cave National Park, South Dakota, researchers observed prairie dogs feeding on common mullein. Plants over 3 feet (1 m) tall were clipped by prairie dogs throughout the summer to maintain visibility in their town. Portions, likely fruits and seeds, were consumed, and the rest of the plant was "destroyed" [69].

Livestock: Livestock typically avoid common mullein (Isley, personal communication, cited in [52]). Some suggest that common mullein is poor forage and is "never grazed" [62,103]. In the mixed-conifer zone of California's Blodgett Forest Research Station, however, the abundance of common mullein in cow summer diets ranged from 0% to 3.5%. Fecal samples were collected for 2 years in an area stocked at 16 ha/AU [68].

Insects: Grasshoppers avoid feeding on common mullein's hairiest immature leaves. During field experiments in northern Arizona, young and immature leaves with the densest and longest hairs were fed on significantly less (P<0.001) than mature leaves [151].

  • 52. Gross, Katherine L.; Werner, Patricia A. 1978. Biology of Canadian Weeds. 28. Verbascum thapsus L. and Verbascum blattaria L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 58(2): 401-413. [69386]
  • 64. Johnson, James R.; Nichols, James T. 1970. Plants of South Dakota grasslands: A photographic study. Bull. 566. Brookings, SD: South Dakota State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. 163 p. [18483]
  • 21. Campbell, Erick G.; Johnson, Rolf L. 1983. Food habits of mountain goats, mule deer, and cattle on Chopaka Mountain, Washington, 1977-1980. Journal of Range Management. 36(4): 488-491. [44985]
  • 60. Howard, William Johnston. 1937. Notes on winter foods of Michigan deer. Journal of Mammalogy. 18(1): 77-80. [55166]
  • 62. Humphrey, Robert R. 1955. Forage production on Arizona ranges: IV. Coconino, Navajo, Apache counties: A study in range condition. Bulletin 266. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station. 84 p. [5087]
  • 68. Kie, John G.; Boroski, Brian B. 1996. Cattle distribution, habitats, and diets in the Sierra Nevada of California. Journal of Range Management. 49(6): 482-488. [27215]
  • 69. King, John A. 1955. Social behavior, social organization, and population dynamics in a black-tailed prairie dog town in the Black Hills of South Dakota. In: Contributions from the Laboratory of Vertebrate Biology. Number 67. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. 123 p. [4032]
  • 74. Krysl, Leslie J.; Moody, John D.; Simpson, C. David. 1979. Mule deer food habits and preferences in Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Texas. In: Sosebee, Ronald E.; Wright, Henry A., eds. Research highlights--1979: Noxious brush and weed control; range and wildlife management. Volume 10. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University, College of Agricultural Sciences: 48-49. [39004]
  • 82. Lavelle, Darlene Anne. 1986. Use and preference of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) by elk (Cervus elaphus) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) on two winter ranges in western Montana. Missoula, MT: University of Montana. 72 p. Thesis. [37896]
  • 103. Parker, Karl G. 1975. Some important Utah range plants. Extension Service Bulletin EC-383. Logan, UT: Utah State University. 174 p. [9878]
  • 117. Sandoval, Leonard; Holechek, Jerry; Biggs, James; Valdez, Raul; VanLeeuwen, Dawn. 2005. Elk and mule deer diets in north-central New Mexico. Rangeland Ecology & Management. 58(4): 366-372. [55530]
  • 151. Woodman, Robert L.; Fernandes, G. Wilson. 1991. Differential mechanical defense: herbivory, evapotranspiration, and leaf-hairs. Oikos. 60(1): 11-19. [69402]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Risks

Ecological Threat in the United States

Common mullein threatens natural meadows and forest openings, where it adapts easily to a wide variety of site conditions. Once established, it grows more vigorously than many native herbs and shrubs, and its growth can overtake a site in fairly short order. Common mullein is a prolific seeder and its seeds last a very long time in the soil. An established population of common mullein can be extremely difficult to eradicate.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

U.S. National Park Service Weeds Gone Wild website

Source: U.S. National Park Service

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Verbascum thapsus

Verbascum thapsus (great mullein or common mullein) is a species of mullein native to Europe, northern Africa and Asia, and introduced in the Americas and Australia.

It is a hairy biennial plant that can grow to 2 metres tall or more. Its small yellow flowers are densely grouped on a tall stem, which bolts from a large rosette of leaves. It grows in a wide variety of habitats, but prefers well-lit disturbed soils, where it can appear soon after the ground receives light, from long-lived seeds that persist in the soil seed bank. It is a common weedy plant that spreads by prolifically producing seeds, but rarely becomes aggressively invasive, since its seed require open ground to germinate. It is a very minor problem for most agricultural crops, since it is not a very competitive species, being intolerant of shade from other plants and unable to survive tilling. It also hosts many insects, some of which can be harmful to other plants. Although individuals are easy to remove by hand, populations are difficult to eliminate permanently.

It is widely used for herbal remedies with emollient and astringent properties. It is known to possess anti-inflammatory, anti-tumour, antiviral, antifungal, antibacterial, expectorant, and analgesic properties.[1] It is especially recommended for coughs and related problems, but also used in topical applications against a variety of skin problems. The plant was also used to make dyes and torches.

Description[edit]

A stemless rosette in Hawaii

Verbascum thapsus is a dicotyledonous plant that produces a rosette of leaves in its first year of growth.[2][3] The leaves are large, up to 50 cm long. The second=year plants normally produce a single unbranched stem usually 1–2 m tall. In the East of its range in China, it is, however, only reported to grow up to 1.5 m tall.[4] The tall pole-like stems end in a dense spike of flowers[2] that can occupy up to half the stem length. All parts of the plants are covered with star-shaped trichomes.[4][5] This cover is particularly thick on the leaves, giving them a silvery appearance. The species' chromosome number is 2n = 36.[6]

On flowering plants the leaves are alternately arranged up the stem. They are thick and decurrent, with much variation in leaf shape between the upper and lower leaves on the stem, ranging from oblong to oblanceolate, and reaching sizes up to 50 cm long and 14 cm across (19 inches long and 5 inches wide).[7][8] They become smaller higher up the stem,[2][3] and less strongly decurrent down the stem.[2] The flowering stem is solid and 2–2.5 cm (nearly an inch) across, and occasionally branched just below the inflorescence,[3] usually following damage.[9] After flowering and seed release the stem and fruits usually persist in winter,[10] drying into dark brown, stiff structures of densely packed, ovoid-shaped and dry seed capsules. The dried stems may persist into the following spring or even the next summer. The plant produces a shallow taproot.[8]

A closeup of the flowers

Flowers are pentamerous with (usually) five stamen, a 5-lobed calyx tube and a 5-petalled corolla, the latter bright yellow and an 1.5–3 cm (0.5–1 inch) wide. The flowers are almost sessile, with very short pedicels (2 mm, 0.08 in). The five stamens are of two types, with the three upper stamens being shorter, their filaments covered by yellow or whitish hairs, and having smaller anthers, while the lower two stamens have glabrous filaments and larger anthers.[5][note 1] The plant produces small ovoid (6 mm, 0.24 in) capsules that split open by way of two valves, each capsule containing large numbers of minute brown seeds less than a millimetre (0.04 in)[11] in size, marked with longitudinal ridges. A white-flowered form, V. thapsus f. candicans, is known to occur.[12] Flowering lasts for up to three months from early to late summer (June to August in northern Europe),[3] with flowering starting at the bottom of the spike and progressing irregularly upward; each flower opens for part of a day and only a few open at the same time around the stem.[10]

Taxonomy[edit]

For the purpose of botanical nomenclature, Verbascum thapsus was first described by Carolus Linnaeus in his 1753 Species Plantarum. The specific epithet thapsus had been first used by Theophrastus (as Θάψος, Thapsos)[13] for an unspecified herb from the Ancient Greek settlement of Thapsos, near modern Syracuse, Sicily,[13][14] though it is often assimilated to the ancient Tunisian city of Thapsus.[15]

At the time, no type specimen was specified, as the practice only arose later, in the 19th century. When a lectotype (type selected amongst original material) was designated, it was assigned to specimen 242.1 of Linnaeus' herbarium, the only V. thapsus specimen.[note 2] The species had previously been designated as type species for Verbascum.[17] European plants exhibit considerable phenotypical variation,[18] which has led to the plant acquiring many synonyms over the years.[16][19] Introduced American populations show much less variation.[18]

The taxonomy of Verbascum has not undergone any significant revision since Svanve Mürbeck's monographies in the 30s, with the exception of the work of Arthur Huber-Morath, who used informal group in organizing the genus for the floras of Iran and Turkey to account for many intermediate species. Since Huber-Morath's groups are not taxonomical, Mürbeck's treatment is the most current one available, as no study has yet sought to apply genetic or molecular data extensively to the genus. In Mürbeck's classification, V. thapsus is placed in section Bothrospermae subsect. Fasciculata (or sect. Verbascum subsect. Verbascum depending on nomenclatural choices) alongside species such as Verbascum nigrum (black or dark mullein), Verbascum lychnitis (white mullein) and Verbascum sinuatum (wavy-leaved mullein).[20][21]

Subspecies and hybrids[edit]

There are three usually recognized subspecies:

  • V. thapsus subsp. thapsus; type, widespread.
  • V. thapsus subsp. crassifolium (Lam.) Murb.; Mediterranean region and to 2000 metres in southwestern Austria.[22] (syn. subsp. montanum (Scrad.) Bonnier & Layens)
  • V. thapsus subsp. giganteum (Willk.) Nyman; Spain, endemic.

In all subspecies but the type, the lower stamens are also hairy.[23] In subsp. crassifolium, the hairiness is less dense and often absent from the upper part of the anthers, while lower leaves are hardly decurrent and have longer petioles.[22] In subsp. giganteum, the hairs are densely white tomentose, and lower leaves strongly decurrent. Subsp. crassifolium also differs from the type in having slightly larger flowers, which measure 15–30 mm wide, whereas in the type they are 12–20 mm in diameter.[22] Both subsp. giganteum and subsp. crassifolium were originally described as species.[2] Due to its morphological variation, V. thapsus has had a great many subspecies described. A recent revision lead its author to maintain V. giganteum but sink V. crassifolium into synonymy.[21]

Hybrids of Verbascum thapsus[6][24]
Hybrid nameOther parent speciesNotes
V. × duernsteinense TeyberV. speciosum
V. × godronii BoreauV. pulverulentum
V. × kerneri FritschV. phlomoides
V. × lemaitrei BoreauV. virgatum
V. × pterocaulon Franch.V. blattaria
V. × thapsi L.V. lychnitissyn. V. × spurium W.D.J.Koch,
may be a nomen ambiguum[25]
V. × semialbum Chaub.V. nigrum
noneV. pyramidatum

The plant is also parent to several hybrids (see table). Of these, the most common is V. × semialbum Chaub. (× V. nigrum).[6] All occur in Eurasia,[6] and three, V. × kerneri Fritsch, V. × pterocaulon Franch. and V. × thapsi L. (syn. V. × spurium W.D.J.Koch), have also been reported in North America.[24][26]

Common names[edit]

V. thapsus is known by a variety of names. European reference books call it "great mullein".[27][28][29] In North America, "common mullein" is used [30][31] while western United States residents commonly refer to mullein as "cowboy toilet paper".[32][33]

In the 19th century it had well over 40 different common names in English alone. Some of the more whimsical ones included "hig candlewick", "indian rag weed", "bullicks lungwort", "Adams-rod", "hare's-beard" and "ice-leaf".[34] Vernacular names include innumerable references to the plant's hairiness: "woolly mullein", "velvet mullein" or "blanket mullein",[29][35] "beggar's blanket", "Moses' blanket", "poor man's blanket", "Our Lady's blanket" or "old man's blanket",[28][31][36] and "feltwort", and so on ("flannel" is another common generic name). "Lamb's ear" ia also used.[citation needed]

Some names refer to the plant's size and shape: "shepherd's club(s)" or "staff", "Aaron's Rod" (a name it shares with a number of other plants with tall, yellow inflorescences), and a plethora of other "X's staff" and "X's rod".[28][31][37] The name "velvet dock" or "mullein dock" is also recorded, where "dock" is a British name applied to any broad-leaved plant.[38]

Distribution and habitat[edit]

Verbascum thapsus has a wide native range including Europe, northern Africa and Asia, from the Azores and Canary Islands east to western China, north to the British Isles, Scandinavia and Siberia, and south to the Himalayas.[4][39][40] In northern Europe, it grows from sea level up to 1,850 m altitude,[3] while in China it grows at 1,400–3,200 m altitude.[4]

It has been introduced throughout the temperate world, and is established as a weed in Australia, New Zealand, tropical Asia, La Réunion, North America, Hawaii, Chile, Hispaniola and Argentina.[40][41][42][43] It has also been reported in Japan.[44]

In the United States it was imported very early in the 18th[note 3] century and cultivated for its medicinal and piscicide property. By 1818, it had begun spreading so much that Amos Eaton thought it was a native plant.[note 4][8][45] In 1839 it was already reported in Michigan and in 1876, in California.[8] It is now found commonly in all the states.[46] In Canada, it is most common in the Maritime Provinces as well as southern Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia, with scattered populations in between.[18][47]

Great Mullein most frequently grows as a colonist of bare and disturbed soil, usually on sandy or chalky ones.[6] It grows best in dry, sandy or gravelly soils, although it can grow in a variety of habitats, including banksides, meadows, roadsides, forest clearings and pastures. This ability to grow in a wide range of habitats has been linked to strong phenotype variation rather than adaptation capacities.[48]

Ecology[edit]

A Mullein plant growing in aa dry, mountainous area.
V. thapsus grows best where there is little competition.

Great Mullein is a biennial and generally requires winter dormancy before it can flower.[9] This dormancy is linked to starch degradation activated by low temperatures in the root, and gibberellin application bypasses this requirement.[49] Seeds germinates almost solely in bare soil, at temperatures between 10 °C and 40 °C.[9] While they can germinate in total darkness if proper conditions are present (tests give a 35% germination rate under ideal conditions), in the wild, they in practice only do so when exposed to light, or very close to the soil surface, which explains the plant's habitat preferences. While it can also grow in areas where some vegetation already exists, growth of the rosettes on bare soil is four to seven times more rapid.[9]

Seeds germinate in spring and summer. Those that germinate in autumn produce plants that overwinter if they are large enough, while rosettes less than 15 cm (5.9 in) across die in winter. After flowering the entire plant usually dies at the end of its second year,[9] but some individuals, especially in the northern parts of the range, require a longer growth period and flower in their third year. Under better growing conditions, some individuals flower in the first year.[50] Triennial individuals have been found to produce fewer seeds than biennial and annual ones. While year of flowering and size are linked to the environment, most other characteristics appear to be genetic.[51]

A given flower is open only for a single day, opening before dawn and closing in the afternoon.[18] Flowers are self-fecundating and protogynous (with female parts maturing first),[18] and will self-pollinate if they have not been pollinated by insects during the day. While many insects visit the flowers, only some bees actually accomplish pollination. V. thapsus' flowering period lasts from June to August in most of its range, extending to September or October in warmer climates.[8][9][11] Visitors include halictid bees and hoverflies.[10] The hair on lower stamens may serve to provide footholds for visitors.[18]

A close-up of the green capsules of V. thapsus, surrounded by the sepals
The fruit of great mullein contains large numbers of minute seed.

The seeds maintain their germinative powers for decades, up to a hundred years, according to some studies.[52] Because of this, and because the plant is an extremely prolific seed bearer (each plant produces hundreds of capsules, each containing up to 700+ seeds,[18] with a total up to 180,000[8][9] or 240,000[11] seeds), it remains in the soil seed bank for extended periods of time, and can sprout from apparently bare ground,[9] or shortly after forest fires long after previous plants have died.[11] Its population pattern typically consists of an ephemeral adult population followed by a long period of dormancy as seeds.[18] Great Mullein rarely establishes on new grounds without human intervention because its seeds do not disperse very far. Seed dispersion requires the stem to be moved by wind or animal movement; 75% of the seeds fall within 1 m of the parent plant, and 93% fall within 5 m.[9]

Megachilidae bees of the genus Anthidium use the hair (amongst that of various woolly plants) in making their nests.[53] The seeds are generally too small for birds to feed on,[10] although the American Goldfinch has been reported to consume them.[54] Other bird species have been reported to consume the leaves (Hawaiian Goose)[55] or flowers (Palila),[56] or to use the plant as a source when foraging for insects (White-headed Woodpecker).[57]

Agricultural impacts and control[edit]

Because it cannot compete with established plants, Great Mullein is no longer considered a serious agricultural weed and is easily crowded out in cultivation,[18] except in areas where vegetation is sparse to begin with, such as Californian semi-desertic areas of the Eastern Sierra Nevada. In such ecological contexts, it crowds out native herbs and grasses; its tendency to appear after forest fires also disturbs the normal ecological succession.[9][11] Although not an agricultural threat, its presence can be very difficult to completely eradicate, and is especially problematic in overgrazed pastures.[8][9][11] The species is legally listed as a noxious weed in the American state of Colorado (Class C)[58] and Hawaii,[59] and the Australian state of Victoria (regionally prohibited in the West Gippsland region, and regionally controlled in several others).[60]

Despite not being an agricultural weed in itself, it hosts a number of insects and diseases, including both pests and beneficial insects.[61] It is also a potential reservoir of the cucumber mosaic virus, Erysiphum cichoraceum (the cucurbit powdery mildew) and Texas root rot.[18][62] A study found V. thapsus hosts insects from 29 different families. Most of the pests found were western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis), Lygus species such as the tarnished plant bug (L. lineolaris), and various spider mites from the family Tetranychidae. These make the plant a potential reservoir for overwintering pests.[61]

Other insects commonly found on Great Mullein feed exclusively on Verbascum species in general or V. thapsus in particular. They include mullein thrips (Haplothrips verbasci),[61] Gymnaetron tetrum (whose larva consume the seeds) and the Mullein Moth (Cucullia verbasci).[8] Useful insects are also hosted by Great Mullein, including predatory mites of the Galendromus, Typhlodromus and Amblyseius genera, the minute pirate bug Orius tristicolor[61] and the mullein plant bug (Campylomma verbasci).[63] The plant's ability to host both pests and beneficials makes it potentially useful to maintain stable populations of insects used for biological control in other cultures, like Campylomma verbasci and Dicyphus hesperus (Miridae), a predator of whiteflies.[64][65] A number of pest Lepidoptera species, including the Stalk Borer (Papaipema nebris) and Gray Hairstreak (Strymon melinus), also use V. thapsus as a host plant.[66]

A series of leaves are seen wrapping down the length of a stem. The leaves have thick veining and both them and the stem have a woolly appearance from the hair covering them.
Because of the plant's hairiness, Verbascum thapsus is resistant to grazing and contact herbicides.

Control of the plant, when desired, is best managed via mechanical means, such as hand pulling and hoeing, preferably followed by sowing of native plants. Animals rarely graze it because of its irritating hairs, and liquid herbicides require surfactants to be effective, as the hair causes water to roll off the plant, much like the lotus effect. Burning is ineffective, as it only creates new bare areas for seedlings to occupy.[8][9][11] G. tetrum and Cucullia verbasci usually have little effect on V. thapsus populations as a whole.[11] Goats and chickens have also been proposed to control Mullein.[9] Effective (when used with a surfactant) contact herbicides include glyphosate,[8][11] triclopyr[8] and sulfurometuron-methyl.[11] Ground herbicides, like tebuthiuron, are also effective, but recreate bare ground and require repeated application to prevent regrowth.[9]

Uses[edit]

Great Mullein has been used since ancient times as a remedy for skin, throat and breathing ailments. It has long had a medicinal reputation, especially as an astringent and emollient, as it contains mucilage, several saponins, coumarin and glycosides. Dioscorides recommended it for diseases of the lung and it is now widely available in health and herbal stores. Non-medical uses have included dyeing and making torches.

Medical uses[edit]

"Verbasci flos": dried flowers of Verbascum thapsus as used in herbal tea

Dioscorides first recommended the plant 2000 years ago, against pulmonary diseases,[67] and this has remained one of its primary uses, especially against cough. Leaf decoctions or herbal teas were used for expectoration, consumption, dry cough, bronchitis, sore throat and hemorrhoids. Leaves were also smoked against pulmonary ailments, a tradition that in America was rapidly transmitted to Native American peoples.[28][68] They used the non-indigenous plant to make syrups against croup. The combination of expectorant saponins and emollient mucilage makes the plant particularly effective for cough. All preparations meant to be drunk have to be finely filtered to eliminate the irritating hairs.[49] The Zuni people use the plant as well. A poultice of powdered root is applied to sores, rashes and skin infections. An infusion of the root is also used to treat athlete's foot. [69]

Oil from the flowers was used against catarrhs, colics and, in Germany, earaches, frostbite, eczema and other external conditions.[28] Topical application of various V. thapsus-based preparations was recommended for the treatment of warts,[70] boils, carbuncles, hemorrhoids, and chilblains, amongst others.[28][68] Recent studies have found that Great Mullein contains glycyrrhizin compounds with bactericide and potential anti-tumoral action. These compounds are concentrated in the flowers.[71] Different extracts have varying levels of efficiency against bacteria.[49] The German Commission E sanctioned medicinal use of the plant for catarrhs.[72] It was also part of the National Formulary in the United States[68] and United Kingdom.[28] The plant's leaves, in addition to the seeds, have been reported to contain rotenone, although quantities are unknown.[73]

Other uses[edit]

Like many ancient medicinal plants (Pliny the Elder describes it in his Naturalis Historia),[note 5] Great Mullein was linked to witches,[28] although the relationship remained generally ambiguous, and the plant was also widely held to ward off curses and evil spirits.[28][49][67][68] The seeds contain several compounds (saponins, glycosides, coumarin, rotenone) that cause breathing problems in fish, and have been widely used as piscicide for fishing.[8][75]

The flowers provide dyes of bright yellow or green, and have been used for hair dye.[28][73] The dried leaves and hair were made into candle wicks, or put into shoes to help with insulating them. The dried stems were also dipped into suet or wax to make torches.[28][68] Due to its weedy capacities, the plant, unlike other species of the genus (such as V. phoeniceum), is not often cultivated.

The stalk can also be dried as a spindle for making fire either by hand drill or bow drill.

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ They are all hairy in subspecies crassifolium and giganteum.
  2. ^ The lectotypification is usually attributed to Arthur Huber-Morath (1971) Denkschriften der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 87:43. Some disagree since Huber-Morath did not specifically cite sheet 242.1, and credit instead L. H. Cramer, in Dassanayake & Fosberg (1981) A Revised Handbook to the Flora of Ceylon 3:389.[16]
  3. ^ The 1630 number in Mitch may be a typo: the beginning of the 18th century is cited in other sources.[8][18]
  4. ^ Eaton went so far as to write: "When botanists are so infatuated with wild speculation, as to tell us the mullein was introduced, they give our youngest pupils occasion to sneer at their teachers."[12]
  5. ^ In book 25, Pliny describes "two principal kinds [of verbascum]" thought to be V. thapsus and V. sinuatum. The precise attribution of a third kind is unclear.[74]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "What's in a Name? Can Mullein Weed Beat TB Where Modern Drugs Are Failing?". 
  2. ^ a b c d e Ferguson, Ian Keith (1972). "V. thapsus". In Tutin, Thomas Gaskell et al.. Flora Europaea. Volume 3: Diapensiaceae to Myoporaceae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 211. ISBN 0-521-08489-X. 
  3. ^ a b c d e Blamey, M., & Grey-Wilson, C. (1989). Flora of Britain and Northern Europe. Hodder & Stoughton, ISBN 0-340-40170-2.
  4. ^ a b c d "Verbascum thapsus". Flora of China. eFloras.org. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  5. ^ a b Wetherwax, M. (1993). "Verbascum thapsus L.". Jepson Manual online. University of California at Berkeley. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  6. ^ a b c d e Stace, C.; R. van der Meijden and I. de Kort (eds.). "Verbascum thapsus (Mullein, Great)". Interactive Flora of NW Europe. World Biodiversity Database. Retrieved 2011-11-20. 
  7. ^ Huxley, A., ed. (1992). New RHS Dictionary of Gardening. Macmillan. ISBN 0-333-47494-5
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Remaley, Tom (1998). "Verbascum thapsus". Plant Conservation Alliance's Alien Plant Working Group. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Hoshovsky, Marc C. (August 2001). "Element Stewardship Abstract for Verbascum thapsus" (PDF). The Global Invasive Species Initiative. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  10. ^ a b c d Hilty, John. "Great Mullein". Weedy Wildflowers of Illinois. Illinois Wildflowers. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Pitcairn, Michael. "Verbascum thapsus". Invasive Plants of California's Wildland. California Invasive Plant COuncil. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  12. ^ a b Pennel, Francis Whittier (1935). The Scrophulariaceae of eastern temperate North America. Philadelphia: George W. Carpenter Fund. pp. 173–174. OCLC 852625. 
  13. ^ a b (French)Carnoy, A. (1959). Dictionnaire étymologique des noms grecs de plantes. Louvain: Publications Universitaires. OCLC 3284108. 
  14. ^ (Swedish) Den virtuella Floran: Verbascum thapsus, retrieved on November 6, 2009.
  15. ^ Charters, Michael L. "Plant name: T". California Plant Names: Latin and Greek Meanings and Derivations. Calflora.net. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  16. ^ a b "Verbascum thapsus: citation". Atlas of Florida vascular Plants. Institute for Systematic Botany. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  17. ^ "Verbascum thapsus". Linnaean Plant Name Typification Project. Natural History Museum. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  18. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Gross, Katherine L.; Patricia A. Werner (April 1978). "The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 28. Verbascum thapsus L. and V. blattaria L". Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58 (2): 401–413. doi:10.4141/cjps78-062.  Reprinted in Mulligan, G.A. (1979), The Biology of Canadian Weeds I, ISBN 0-662-10668-7, pp. 320–331.
  19. ^ "Verbascum thapsus synonymy". Northern Ontario Plant Database. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  20. ^ Attar, Farideh et al. (2007). "Micromorphological studies on Verbascum (Scrophulariaceae) in Iran with emphasis on seed surface, capsule ornamentation and trichomes". Flora – Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 202 (2): 169–175. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2006.04.001. 
  21. ^ a b (Spanish) Benedí Gonzalez, Carles (2009). "Verbascum". Flora Iberica. Volumen XIII: Plantaginaceae-Scrophulariaceae. Madrid: Real Jardín Botánico. pp. 49–97. ISBN 978-84-00-08747-0. 
  22. ^ a b c Schmeil, Otto; Fitschen, Jost; Seybold, Siegmund (2006). Flora von Deutschland, 93. Auflage. Wiebelsheim: Quelle & Meyer Verlag. p. 496. ISBN 3-494-01413-2. 
  23. ^ (Catalan) "Verbascum thapsus L. subsp. montanum (Schrad.) Bonnier et layens". Herbario Virtual del Mediterráneo Occidental. Universitat de les Illes Balears. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  24. ^ a b Kartesz, John (1994). A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland (Volume 1: Checklist). Portland, Oregon: Timber Press. p. 588. ISBN 0-88192-204-8. 
  25. ^ "Verbascum × thapsi". Linnaean Plant Name Typification Project. Natural History Museum. Retrieved 2007-05-14. 
  26. ^ "Verbascum L.". PLANTS Profile. USDA Natural resources Conservation Service. Retrieved 2007-03-07. 
  27. ^ "Great Mullein Verbascum thapsus Linnaeus". Wildlife Statistics. Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  28. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Grieve, Margaret (1982) [1931]. "Mullein, Great". A Modern Herbal. Volume 2: I-Z. New York: Dover Publication. ISBN 0-486-22799-5. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  29. ^ a b Watts (2000), pp. 633–634.
  30. ^ Niering, William A. (1979). The Audubon Society field guide to North American wildflowers, eastern region. New York: Knopf. p. 798. ISBN 0-394-50432-1. 
  31. ^ a b c Harold William Rickett, ed. (1966). "The Mulleins (Verbascum)". Wild Flowers of the United States. Volume 1. The Northeastern States (Part 2). New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 389. LCCN 6617920. 
  32. ^ "Beyond the River". Texas Parks & Wildlife Magazine. Dale Weisman. Retrieved 2010-06-26. 
  33. ^ "BIO 406D-Native Plants". An Introduction to the Flora of Central Texas. Michael Gruenstaeudl. Retrieved 2010-06-26. 
  34. ^ Britton, Nathaniel A.; Addison Brown (1979). An illustrated flora of the northern United States and Canada. V. 3. Gentianaceae to Compositae. New York: Dover Publications. p. 175. ISBN 0-486-22644-1. 
  35. ^ Brako, Lois; Amy Y. Rossman and David F. Farr (1995). Scientific and common names of 7,000 vascular plants in the United States. St. Paul, Minnesota: APS Press. p. 189. ISBN 0-89054-171-X. 
  36. ^ Watts (2000), pp. 108, 369.
  37. ^ Watts (2000), pp. 774–775, 819–820. p. 866: "A tall plant like Mullein attracts 'staff' and 'rod' names."
  38. ^ Watts (2000), pp. 302, 634.
  39. ^ Flora Europaea: Verbascum thapsus, retrieved on November 6, 2009.
  40. ^ a b Germplasm Resources Information Network: Verbascum thapsus, retrieved on November 6, 2009.
  41. ^ (Spanish) "Ficha de la Especie Verbascum thapsus". Base de Datos sobre Invasiones Biológicas en Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  42. ^ "Verbascum thapsus". Global Invasive Species Database. IUCN Invasive Species Specialist Group. 8 July 2005. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  43. ^ "Verbascum thapsus". Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk. Hawaiian Ecosystems at Risk project. February 19, 2007. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  44. ^ "List of alien species recognized to be established in Japan or found in the Japanese wild (as of October 27, 2004)" (PDF). Japan Ministry of Environment. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  45. ^ Mitch, Larry W. "Common Mullein—the Roadside Torch Parade". Intriguing World of Weeds. Weed Science Society of America. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  46. ^ "Verbascum thapsus". PLANTS Database. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  47. ^ "Verbascum thapsus". NatureServe Explorer. Retrieved 2009-11-06. []: , retrieved December 29, 2006.
  48. ^ Parker, Ingrid M.; Joseph Rodriguez, Michael E. Loik (February 2003). "An Evolutionary Approach to Understanding the Biology of Invasions: Local Adaptation and General-Purpose Genotypes in the Weed Verbascum thapsus". Conservation Biology 17 (1): 59–72. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02019.x. 
  49. ^ a b c d Turker, Arzu Ucar; Ekrem Gurel (September 2005). "Common Mullein (Verbascum thapsus L.): Recent Advances in Research". Phytotherapy Research 19 (9): 733–739. doi:10.1002/ptr.1653. PMID 16222647. 
  50. ^ Reinartz, James A. (November 1984). "Life History Variation of Common Mullein (Verbascum Thapsus): I. Latitudinal Differences in Population Dynamics and Timing of Reproduction". The Journal of Ecology 72 (3): 897–912. doi:10.2307/2259539. ISSN 0022-0477. JSTOR 2259539. 
  51. ^ Reinartz, James A. (November 1984). "Life History Variation of Common Mullein (Verbascum Thapsus): III. Differences Among Sequential Cohorts". The Journal of Ecology 72 (3): 927–936. doi:10.2307/2259541. JSTOR 2259541. 
  52. ^ Kivilaan, A.; Robert S. Bandurski (October 1981). "The One Hundred-Year Period for Dr. Beal's Seed Viability Experiment". American Journal of Botany 69 (9): 1290–1292. doi:10.2307/2443054. ISSN 0002-9122. JSTOR 2443054. 
  53. ^ Westrich, Paul (1996). "Habitat requirements of central European bees and the problems of partial habitats". In Matheson & al. (eds.). The Conservation of Bees. Linnean Society Symposium Series, 18. London: Academic Press. pp. 1–16. 
  54. ^ Coutlee, Ellen L. (December 1963). "Maintenance Behavior of the American Goldfinch" (PDF). Wilson Bulletin 75 (4): 342–357. ISSN 0043-5643. 
  55. ^ Banko, Paul C., Black, Jeffrey M. and Banko, Winston E. (1999). Hawaiian Goose (Branta sandvicensis), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
  56. ^ Banko, Paul C. et al. (2002). Palila (Loxioides bailleui), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornitholog.
  57. ^ Garrett, Kimball L., Raphael, Martin G. and Dixon, Rita D. (1996). White-headed Woodpecker (Picoides albolarvatus), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
  58. ^ "Colorado State-listed Noxious Weeds". PLANTS Database. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  59. ^ "Hawaii State-listed Noxious Weeds". PLANTS Database. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  60. ^ Faithful, Ian. "Great Mullein". Victoria Department of Primary Industries. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  61. ^ a b c d Horton, David R.; Tamera M. Lewis (December 2003). "Numbers and types of arthropods overwintering on common mullein, Verbascum thapsus L. (Scrophulariaceae), in a central Washington fruit-growing region" (PDF). Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 100: 79–86. ISSN 0071-0733. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  62. ^ Price, W. C. (July 1940). "Comparative Host Ranges of Six Plant Viruses". American Journal of Botany 57 (7): 530–541. doi:10.2307/2437088. ISSN 0002-9122. JSTOR 2437088. 
  63. ^ Higbee, Bradley S. "Campylomma verbasci (Meyer)". Biological Control: A Guide to Natural Enemies in North America. Cornell University. Retrieved 2011-12-21. 
  64. ^ Ferguson, Gillian (26 September 2005). "Can Dicyphus hesperus control whiteflies in greenhouse tomatoes?". Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  65. ^ Sanchez, Juan Antonio; David R. Gillespie, Robert R. McGregor (November 2003). "The effects of mullein plants (Verbascum thapsus) on the population dynamics of Dicyphus hesperus (Heteroptera: Miridae) in tomato greenhouses". Biological Control 28 (3): 313–319. doi:10.1016/S1049-9644(03)00116-6. 
  66. ^ "HOSTS – a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants". The Natural History Museum. Archived from the original on June 27, 2008. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  67. ^ a b Silverman, Maida (1977). "Mullein". A City Herbal: Lore, Legend, & Uses of Common Weeds. Ash Tree Publishing. pp. 99–104. ISBN 1-888123-00-1. 
  68. ^ a b c d e Hanrahan, Claire; Rebecca J. Frey (2005). "Mullein". In Jacqueline L. Longe. The Gale encyclopedia of alternative medicine. Volume 3: L-R (2nd ed.). Detroit: Thomson Gale. ISBN 0-7876-7427-3. Retrieved 2006-11-30. 
  69. ^ Camazine, Scott and Robert A. Bye 1980 A Study Of The Medical Ethnobotany Of The Zuni Indians of New Mexico. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2:365-388 (p. 378)
  70. ^ Drury, Susan (1991). "Plants and Wart Cures in England from the Seventeenth to the Nineteenth Century: Some Examples". Folklore 102 (1): 97–100. doi:10.1080/0015587X.1991.9715809. JSTOR 1260360. 
  71. ^ Turker, Arzu Ucar; N. D. Camper (October 2002). "Biological activity of common mullein, a medicinal plant". Journal of Ethnopharmacology 82 (2–3): 117–125. doi:10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00186-1. PMID 12241986. 
  72. ^ "Mullein flower". The Commission E Monographs. American Botanical Council. February 1, 1990. Archived from the original on 2006-05-11. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  73. ^ a b "Verbascum thapsus". Plants For A Future. Retrieved 2011-03-16. 
  74. ^ Latin, English
  75. ^ Wilhelm, Gene (April 1974). "The mullein: Plant piscicide of the mountain folk culture". Geographical Review 64 (2): 235–252. doi:10.2307/213812. JSTOR 213812. 

Bibliography[edit]

  • Watts, Donald (2000). Elsevier's Dictionary of Plant Names and their Origin. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. ISBN 0-444-50356-0. 
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

The scientific name of common mullein is Verbascum thapsus L. (Scrophulariaceae) [47,58,65,144,153].

Hybridization occurs within the genus. Common mullein × white mullein (V. lychnitis)
hybrids are suspected in Michigan [143], and common mullein × orange mullein (V. phlomoides)
hybrids, V. × kerneri Fritsch, occur in the Northeast [45].
  • 45. Gleason, Henry A.; Cronquist, Arthur. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York: New York Botanical Garden. 910 p. [20329]
  • 47. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 58. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 143. Voss, Edward G. 1996. Michigan flora. Part III: Dicots (Pyrolaceae--Compositae). Bulletin 61: Cranbrook Institute of Science; University of Michigan Herbarium. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan. 622 p. [30401]
  • 144. Wagner, Warren L.; Herbst, Derral R.; Sohmer, S. H., eds. 1999. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai'i, Revised edition. Volume 2. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press. 989-1918. [70168]
  • 153. Wunderlin, Richard P.; Hansen, Bruce F. 2003. Guide to the vascular plants of Florida. 2nd edition. Gainesville, FL: The University of Florida Press. 787 p. [69433]
  • 65. Kartesz, John T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 1st ed. In: Kartesz, John T.; Meacham, Christopher A. Synthesis of the North American flora (Windows Version 1.0), [CD-ROM]. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Botanical Garden (Producer). In cooperation with: The Nature Conservancy; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service; U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. [36715]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Common Names

common mullein

flannel plant

great mullein

woolly mullein

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!