Overview

Distribution

National Distribution

Canada

Origin: Exotic

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Unknown/Undetermined

Confidence: Confident

United States

Origin: Exotic

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Unknown/Undetermined

Confidence: Confident

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: Lonicera tatarica and Lonicera morrowii hybridize to form Lonicera x bella, which is widely naturalized from Alberta, Canada, east to Maine, south to northern North Carolina, west to Missouri, and north through Kansas, eastern Nebraska, and the Dakotas (Batcher and Stiles, 2000). In the United States, the hybrid is distributed in Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, Vermont, and Wisconsin (USDA, 1999).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

National NatureServe Conservation Status

Canada

Rounded National Status Rank: NNA - Not Applicable

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: NNA - Not Applicable

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: GNA - Not Applicable

Reasons:

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: Lonicera tatarica and Lonicera morrowii hybridize to form Lonicera x bella, which is widely naturalized from Alberta, Canada, east to Maine, south to northern North Carolina, west to Missouri, and north through Kansas, eastern Nebraska, and the Dakotas (Batcher and Stiles, 2000). References to the literature should bear in mind that there may be considerable confusion in the identification of the taxa involved as this cross has often been confused with the two parent species and most often shares hybrid characters with both (Barnes and Cottam, 1974).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!