The following bibliography has been generated by bringing together all references provided by our content partners. There may be duplication.

References

  • Anistratenko, V. 2005. Lectotypes for Tricolia pullus, Gibbula divaricata and Theodoxus fluviatilis (Mollusca, Gastropoda) revisited. Vestnik zoologii, 39 (6): 3-10.
  • Bouchet P.,Gofas S. & Rosenberg G. (2013). WoRMS Mollusca: World Marine Mollusca database (version Feb 2013). In: Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 11th March 2013 (Roskov Y., Kunze T., Paglinawan L., Orrell T., Nicolson D., Culham A., Bailly N., Kirk P., Bourgoin T., Baillargeon G., Hernandez F., De Wever A., eds). Digital resource at www.catalogueoflife.org/col/. Species 2000: Reading, UK.
  • Bunje, P. 2005. Pan-European phylogeography of the aquatic snail Theodoxus fluviatilis (Gastropoda: Neritidae). Molecular Ecology, 14: 4323-4340. Accessed May 23, 2011 at http://paulbunje.com/pdfs/Bunje2005.pdf.
  • Carlsson, R. 2006. Freshwater snail assemblages of semi-isolated brackish water bays on the Aland Islands, SW Finland. Boreal Environment Research, 11 (5): 371-382.
  • Cejka, T., M. Horsak. 2002. First records of Theodoxus fluviatilis and Sphaerium solidum (Mollusca) from Slovakia. Biologia, 57 (10): 561-562.
  • Engkvist, R., L. Kautsky, T. Malm. 1999. Grazing effects of two freshwater snails on juvenile Fucus vesiculosus in the Baltic Sea. Marine ecology process series, 188: 63-71. Accessed May 04, 2011 at http://www.int-res.com/articles/meps/188/m188p063.pdf.
  • Fetter, V.   (1965).  Functional studies of the anatomy of some neritid prosobranchs.  Journal of Zoology. 147, 46-74.
  • Giusti, F., M. Selmi. 1983. The atypical spermatazoon of Theodoxus fluviatilis (L.) (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia). Journal of Ultrastructure Research, 84 (2): 173-181.
  • Hamburger, K., P. Dall. 1990. The respiration of common benthic invertebrate species from the shallow littoral zone of Lake Esrom, Denmark. Hydrobiologia, 199 (2): 117-130. Accessed May 04, 2011 at http://www.springerlink.com/content/q1wn21311402j463/fulltext.pdf.
  • Hickman Jr., C., L. Roberts, S. Keen, A. Larson, D. Eisenhour. 2009. Animal Diversity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Jormalainen, V., S. Korpinen. 2008. Grazing and nutrients reduce recruitment success of Fucus vesiculosus L. (Fucales: Phaeophyceae). Estuarine and coastal marine science, 78 (2): 437-444.
  • Kangas, P., G. Skoog. 1978. Salinity tolerance of Theodoxus fluviatilis (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from freshwater and from different salinity regimes in Baltic Sea. Estuarine and coastal marine science, 6 (4): 409-416.
  • Kautsky, L., S. Raberg. 2008. Grazer identity is crucial for facilitating growth of the perennial brown alga Fucus vesiculosus. Marine ecology process series, 361: 111-118.
  • Kirkegaard, J. 2006. Life history, growth and production of Theodoxus fluviatilis in Lake Esrom, Denmark. Limnologica, 36 (1): 26-41.
  • Liess, A., A. Haglund. 2007. Periphyton responds differentially to nutrients recycled in dissolved or faecal pellet form by the snail grazer Theodoxus fluviatilis. Freshwater Biology, 52 (10): 1997-2008.
  • Lumbye, J. 2004. The oxygen consumption of Theodoxus fluviatilis (L.) and Potamopyrgus jenkinsi (Smith) in brakish and fresh water. Hydrobiologia, 10 (1): 245-262. Accessed May 22, 2011 at http://www.springerlink.com/content/m520416j13523321/fulltext.pdf.
  • Orstan, A. 2007. "New year, new snail: Theodoxus fluviatilis" (On-line). Snail's Tale. Accessed May 22, 2011 at http://snailstales.blogspot.com/2007/01/new-year-new-snail-theodoxus.html.
  • Orton, R., R. Sibley. 1990. Egg size and growth rate in Theodoxus fluviatilis (L). Functional Ecology, 4 (1): 91-94. Accessed May 22, 2011 at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2389657.
  • Schneckli, 2009. "Theodoxus fluviatilis - Common snail Kahn (Linnaeus 1758)" (On-line). Aquarienschnecken.de. Accessed May 12, 2011 at http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.allesumdieschneck.de/html/theodoxus_fluviatilis.html&ei=EJbLS_G9DIPKNdH3kYgF&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CBsQ7gEwCDgK&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dtheodoxus%2Bfluviatilis%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dsafari%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Den.
  • Shevtsova, L., A. Tsybulskiy. 2006. Distribution of Theodoxus fluviatilis L. in the Dniester river and the influence of the hydroelectric power stations on the structure of its population. Hydrobiological Journal, 42 (5): 12-24.
  • Skoog, G. 1976. Effects of acclimatization and physiological state on the tolerance to high temperatures and reactions to desiccation of Theodoxus fluviatilis and Lymnea peregra. Oikos, 27 (1): 50-56.
  • Skoog, G. 1978. Influence of natural food items on growth and egg production in brackish water populations of Lymnea peregra and Theodoxus fluviatilis (Mollusca). Oikos, 31 (3): 340-348.
  • Symanowski, F., J. Hildebrandt. 1984. Differences in osmotolerance in freshwater and brackish water populations of Theodoxus fluviatilis (Gastropoda: Neritidae) are associated with differential protein expression. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 180 (3): 337-346.
  • Vaught, K.C. 1989. A classification of the living Mollusca. American Malacologists: Melbourne, FL (USA). ISBN 0-915826-22-4. XII, 195 pp.
  • Welter Schultes, F. 2009. "Species summary for Theodoxus fluviatilis" (On-line). AnimalBase. Accessed May 31, 2011 at http://www.animalbase.uni-goettingen.de/zooweb/servlet/AnimalBase/home/species?id=1492.
  • Zettler, M. 2004. Freshwater molluscs from Corsica. Notated collections from summer 2003 with emphasis on Theodoxus fluviatilis. Malakologische Abhandlungen, 22: 3-16.
  • Zettler, M., J. Frankowski, R. Bochert, M. Rohner. 2004. Morphological and ecological features of Theodoxus fluviatilis (Linnaeus, 1758) from Baltic brackish water and German freshwater populations. Journal of Conchology, 38 (3): 305-316. Accessed May 11, 2011 at http://www.io-warnemuende.de/tl_files/bio/ag-benthische-organismen/pdf/zettler_et_al-2004-theodoxus.pdf.

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!