Overview
Distribution
Distribution
Trusted
Physical Description
Diagnostic Description
Typhlatta ceylonica Mayr , 1866: 505 (combination in Aenictus by Dalla Torre, 1893: 7).
Aenictus ceylonicus var. latro Forel , 1901: 477 (junior synonym of A. ceylonicus by Wilson, 1964: 452).
Aenictus ceylonicus var. formosensis Forel , 1913: 188 (junior synonym of A. ceylonicus by Wilson, 1964: 452).
Types. Typhlatta ceylonica : Worker syntypes from Sri Lanka ( NHMW , not examined) . Aenictus ceylonicus var. latro : Three worker syntypes from Poona , India ( MCZC , examined) . Aenictus ceylonicus var. formosensis : Worker syntypes from Taiwan (not examined) .
Comments. As previously conceived (Wilson, 1964: 452) this species extended from India and Sri Lanka eastward to Taiwan and south to Australia and contained eight junior synonyms ( formosensis Forel , latro Forel , orientalis Karavaiev , papuanus Donisthorpe , similis Donisthorpe , and turneri Forel (with its junior synonyms deuqueti Crawley and exiguus Clark )). When discussing the specimens placed in ceylonicus Wilson (1964) recognised at least some of the variation noted in this study (for example, see Wilson's figs. 37-44), but interpreted this variation as intraspecific. For example he mentioned that the subpetiolar process varies considerably in its development, but did not appreciate that this variation occurs in discrete states and shows a strong geographic pattern suggesting that a series of species are involved. A careful re-examination of these characters, combined with considerably more material, has resulted in significantly different conclusions being drawn compared to Wilson (1964).
An examination of currently available material has found that the old " ceylonicus " contains a large number of species, including A. ceylonicus (strict sense), A. acerbus , A. orientalis , A. papuanus , A. prolixus and A. turneri . To determine the identity of A. ceylonicus itself will require considerable work and is beyond the scope of the present study. However, there are a wealth of morphological characters which allow the development of robust species hypotheses as has been demonstrated above for the Australian fauna. Having said that, morphological differences among species are often subtle and require considerable attention to detail to decipher. The following notes are provided as a starting point for a full revision of these ants.
Most of the Indian specimens share the configuration of the subpetiolar process, which forms a rounded anterior lobe followed by a posterior flat to concave extension ending at the junction with the postpetiole. Others have an elongate rectangular subpetiolar process, including the types of A. latro . Specimens with both of these morphologies can be found throughout Asia including in Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam and Indonesia. But while material from Vietnam has a rectangular subpetiolar process it has the dorsal surface of the mesosoma smooth and lacking any indication of the metanotal groove (most other species have at least a weak angle at the metanotal groove). Thus while the shape of the subpetiolar process is important it must be used in conjunction with other characters when determining species boundaries.
While the work undertaken here is preliminary, it clearly shows that the situation surrounding this species, and close relatives, is much more complex than that recognised by earlier workers. As a first step in clarifying this situation the names A. orientalis and A. turneri are treated as valid species, A. papuanus and A. similis are transferred to synonymy with A. orientalis while A. formosensis and A. latro are retained as junior synonyms of A. ceylonicus . However this should be treated as preliminary until all relevant material can be studied in detail.
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Molecular Biology
Barcode data: Aenictus ceylonicus
There is 1 barcode sequence available from BOLD and GenBank. Below is the sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species. See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen. Other sequences that do not yet meet barcode criteria may also be available.
-- end --
Download FASTA File
Trusted
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Aenictus ceylonicus
Public Records: 1
Species: 1
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Wikipedia
Aenictus ceylonicus
Aenictus ceylonicus is a species of reddish brown army ant found in Southern India, Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia and Australia.[1] They are completely blind and around 3 mm in length. These ants are seen foraging underneath leaf litter in forests and well-vegetated areas, travelling in a trail of in three or more columns alongside each other, in parts of India. Their antennae, as in most species of Aenictus, have ten segments. The scape is long and extends above the head. The head is smooth and shiny. The mesosoma and the head region are dark brown, while the gaster is oval and lighter in colour, nearly translucent. The mesosoma is broad anteriorly and strongly compressed posteriorly. The petiole and the post petiole are large, conical and shining.[2] They occur in rainforests and moist deciduous forests building temporary nests on the ground and in rotting logs.
Like others in the genus, they prey on ants, social wasps and other arthropods. Some forms of the species such as formosensis of Taiwan were earlier considered separate species.[3]
References
- ^ Tiwari, R. N. (1999). "Taxonomic studies on ants of Southern India (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Memoirs of the Zoological Survey of India 18 (4): 1–96. http://www.archive.org/texts/flipbook/flippy.php?id=ants_08474.
- ^ Ajay N and Sunil M, 2006; On a trail with Ants: A handbook of the Ants of Peninsular India, p 116
- ^ Terayama, M. (1984). "A new species of the army ant genus Aenictus from Taiwan (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Bulletin of the Biogeographical Society of Japan 39: 13–16. http://www.archive.org/details/ants_02843.
Unreviewed
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!


