Overview

Distribution

Range Description

This species was recently described and is poorly known (von Helversen et al. 2001), but current information suggests that it is endemic to central and southern Europe. It is known from Spain, France, Switzerland, Germany, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Montenegro, Romania, Bulgaria, and Greece (Ruedi et al. 2002, Benda et al. 2003, Agirre-Mendi et al. 2004, von Helversen 2004, Helversen et al. 2006, P. Benda in litt. 2006). The species is possibly present for most of Serbia and areas of Montenegro (M. Paunovic pers. comm. 2007).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
According to present scarce knowledge, it is a tree dwelling and forest foraging species. In parts of the range at least it prefers to hunt in small valleys with deciduous trees and flowing water, which is a threatened habitat. The only breeding colony was found in a tree hollow. It may also occur in rural gardens and urban habitats. It probably occurs in underground habitats in winter.

Systems
  • Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Barcode data: Myotis alcathoe

The following is a representative barcode sequence, the centroid of all available sequences for this species.


No available public DNA sequences.

Download FASTA File
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Myotis alcathoe

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 1
Specimens with Barcodes: 4
Species With Barcodes: 1
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
DD
Data Deficient

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2008

Assessor/s
Hutson, A.M., Aulagnier, S., Nagy, Z., Karataş, A., Palmeirim, J. & Paunović, M.

Reviewer/s
Hutson, A.M., Racey, P.A. (Chiroptera Red List Authority) & Temple, H. (Global Mammal Assessment Team)

Contributor/s

Justification
The species has been recently described (2001) and is known from few localities. It is not easy to identify morphologically. More localities are being reported, but insufficient information is currently available on the extent of the range, population size and population trends. Consequently it is assessed as Data Deficient. Based on present knowledge the species is endemic to Europe.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
Its population size and trend is unknown. To date, c.15 localities are recorded in international publications (von Helversen 2001, Benda et al. 2003, von Helversen 2004). However, new localities continue to be found (EMA Workshop 2006, Mediterranean Mammals Workshop 2007).

Population Trend
Unknown
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Major Threats
Damage to riparian forest is believed be a threat in parts of range (von Helversen et al. 2001). Wider forest and roost tree loss (especially in wet old growth forests) may also be threats.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
It is protected by national legislation in most range states. There are also international legal obligations for the species' protection through the Bonn Convention (Eurobats) and Bern Convention. It is included in Annex IV of the EU Habitats and Species Directive, and some habitat protection may be provided through Natura 2000. Conservation recommendations include further research on distribution, population status and trends, ecology, habitat requirements, and threats. Measures to increase public awareness of this little-known species are also recommended.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Myotis alcathoe

Myotis alcathoe is a European bat in the genus Myotis. Known only from Greece and Hungary when it was first described in 2001, its known distribution has since expanded to Spain, England, Sweden, and Azerbaijan, among other countries. It is similar to the whiskered bat (Myotis mystacinus) and other species and is difficult to distinguish from them. However, its brown fur is distinctive and it is clearly different in characters of its karyotype and DNA sequences. Although some genetic data suggest that it is related to Geoffroy's bat (Myotis emarginatus), other analyses do not support a close relationship between M. alcathoe and any other species.

With a forearm length of 30.8 to 34.6 mm (1.2 to 1.4 in) and body mass of 3.5 to 5.5 g (0.1 to 0.2 oz), Myotis alcathoe is a small bat. The fur is usually reddish-brown on the upperparts and brown below, but more grayish in juveniles. The tragus (a projection on the inner side of the ear) is short, as is the ear itself, and the inner side of the ear is pale at the base. The wings are brown and the baculum (penis bone) is short and broad. M. alcathoe has a very high-pitched echolocation call, with a frequency that falls from 120 kHz at the beginning of the call to about 43 kHz at the end.

Usually found in old-growth deciduous forest near water, Myotis alcathoe forages high in the canopy and above water and mostly eats flies. The animal roosts in cavities high in trees. Although there are some winter records from caves, it may also spend the winter in tree cavities. Several parasites have been recorded on M. alcathoe. The IUCN Red List assesses Myotis alcathoe as "Data Deficient", but it is considered threatened in several areas because of its rarity and vulnerability to habitat loss.

Taxonomy[edit]

The whiskered bat (Myotis mystacinus) and similar species in Eurasia (collectively known as "whiskered bats") are difficult to distinguish from each other; for example, the distantly related Brandt's bat (Myotis brandtii) was not recognized as distinct from M. mystacinus until the 1970s.[2] Small, unusual M. mystacinus-like bats were first recorded in Greece in the 1970s, but it was not until the advent of genetic studies that these bats could be confirmed as representing a distinct species, named Myotis alcathoe.[3] In 2001, the species was described by German zoologists Otto von Helversen and Klaus-Gerhard Heller on the basis of specimens from Greece and Hungary.[4] Although it also differs from other whiskered bats by morphological characters, Myotis alcathoe is most clearly distinct in its genetics, including DNA sequences and the location of the nucleolus organizer regions.[5] Hybridization with other whiskered bats further complicates attempts to identify M. alcathoe morphologically.[6]

Von Helversen and Heller argued that none of the old names now considered synonyms of M. mystacinus could apply to M. alcathoe, because these names all have their type localities in western or central Europe.[5] However, the more recent discovery of M. alcathoe further to the west renders it possible that an older name may be discovered.[7] In addition, Russian researcher Suren Gazaryan has suggested that the name caucasicus Tsytsulina, 2000 (originally proposed for a subspecies of M. mystacinus from the Caucasus) may prove to be applicable to M. alcathoe; in that case, the species would be renamed Myotis caucasicus.[8] The species may have remained undetected in Germany for so long because bat researchers did not sample its preferred habitats and would dismiss unusual-looking whiskered bats as being abnormal M. mystacinus or M. brandtii.[9]

On the basis of mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis, Myotis alcathoe was at first thought to be most closely related to Geoffroy's bat (Myotis emarginatus) of southern Europe, North Africa, and southwestern Asia.[10] However, a study of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene incorporating many Myotis species did not support this relationship, and could not place M. alcathoe securely at a specific position among Eurasian Myotis.[11] Two groups with slightly divergent mitochondrial DNA sequences (separated by 1.3 to 1.4% sequence divergence) are distinguishable within the species, which probably correspond to different glacial refugia where M. alcathoe populations survived the last glacial period. One, known as the "Hungarian" group, has been recorded from Spain, France, Austria, Hungary, and Slovakia, and probably corresponds to a refugium in Iberia; the other, the "Greek" group, is known only from Greece and Slovakia.[12]

The specific name, alcathoe, refers to Alcathoe, a figure from Greek mythology who was turned into a bat when she refused the advances of the god Dionysus. She was associated with gorges and small streams, the preferred habitat of Myotis alcathoe in Greece.[13] In their original description, von Helversen and colleagues described her as a nymph,[13] and the common name "nymph bat" has therefore been used for this species.[14] However, none of the classical sources speak of Alcathoe as a nymph; instead, she was a princess, the daughter of King Minyas of Orchomenos. Therefore, Petr Benda recommended in 2008 that the common name "Alcathoe bat" or "Alcathoe myotis" be used instead.[15] Other common names include "Alcathoe's bat"[16] and "Alcathoe whiskered bat".[1]

Description[edit]

Myotis alcathoe is the smallest European Myotis species. The fur is brownish on the upperparts, with a reddish tone in old specimens, and a slightly paler gray-brown below.[3] Younger animals may be completely gray-brown.[17] The brown fur distinguishes adult M. alcathoe from other whiskered bats, but juveniles cannot be unambiguously identified on the basis of morphology.[18] M. alcathoe is similar to Daubenton's bat (Myotis daubentonii) and M. emarginatus in color.[19] On the upper side of the body, the hairs are 6 to 8 mm long and have dark bases and brown tips. The hairs on the lower side of the body are only slightly paler at the tip than at the base.[5]

The face and the upper lips are reddish to pink,[20] not dark brown to black as in M. mystacinus.[21] Although most of the face is hairy, the area around the eyes is bare.[22] The nostrils are heart-shaped,[20] and their back end is broad, as in M. brandtii, not narrow as in M. mystacinus.[23] Several glands are present on the muzzle, most prominently in reproductively active males. The ears are brown and are lighter on the inside than the outside. There is a notch at the edge of the ear, and the pointed tragus (a projection inside the ear that is present in some bats) extends up to this notch;[5] the tragus is longer, extending beyond the notch, in both M. brandtii and M. mystacinus.[24] The base of the inner side of the ear is white; it is much darker in M. mystacinus.[25] The feet and the thumbs are very small. The small size of the ear, tragus, feet, and thumb distinguishes M. alcathoe from the slightly larger M. mystacinus and M. brandtii,[5] but the feet are relatively larger than in M. mystacinus.[22]

The wings are brown, but lighter than those of M. mystacinus.[26] The plagiopatagium (the portion of the wing between the last digit and the hindlegs) is attached to the fifth toe. The tail extends only about 1 mm beyond the back margin of the uropatagium (the portion of the wing membrane between the hindlegs). The calcar, a cartilaginous spur supporting the uropatagium, is slender. With a width around 1.3 mm, the penis is narrow,[5] and it lacks a broadened tip (except in one Croatian specimen).[27] The baculum (penis bone) is about 0.5 mm long.[5] The short and broad shape of this bone distinguishes M. alcathoe from M. brandtii as well as M. ikonnikovi.[28]

The skull is similar in shape to that of M. mystacinus and M. brandtii, but the front part of the braincase is higher. The second and third upper premolars (P2 and P3) are tiny and pressed against the upper canine (C1) and fourth premolar (P4).[5] The canine is less well-developed than in M. mystacinus.[18] There is a clear cusp present on the side of the P4. The accessory cusp known as the protoconule is present on each of the upper molars when they are unworn. M. mystacinus lacks the P4 cusp and the protoconules on the molars,[5] but M. brandtii has an even larger cusp on P4.[24]

As usual in Myotis species, Myotis alcathoe has a karyotype consisting of 44 chromosomes, with the fundamental number of chromosomal arms equal to 52. However, a 1987 study already found that M. alcathoe (then called "Myotis sp. B") differs from both M. mystacinus and M. brandtii in the pattern of active nucleolus organizer regions on the chromosomes.[5] M. alcathoe also differs from other Myotis species in the sequences of the mitochondrial genes 12S rRNA and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 by at least 5% and 13%, respectively.[29]

Myotis alcathoe has the highest-frequency echolocation call of any European Myotis. In open terrain, the call has an average duration of 2.5 ms, but it may be up to 4 ms long. At the beginning, its frequency is around 120 kHz, but it then falls fast, subsequently falls slightly slower, and at the end falls faster again. The call reaches its highest amplitude at around 53 kHz.[30] It terminates at around 43 to 46 kHz; this characteristic is especially distinctive.[31] In different experiments, the time between calls was found to be around 85 and 66 ms, respectively.[32] The high-pitched call may be an adaptation to the animal's occurrence in dense vegetation.[33]

Head and body length is about 4 cm (2 in) and wingspan is around 20 cm (8 in).[34] Forearm length is 30.8 to 34.6 mm (1.2 to 1.4 in), tibia length is 13.5 to 15.9 mm (0.5 to 0.6 in), hindfoot length is 5.1 to 5.8 mm (0.2 to 0.2 in), and body mass is 3.5 to 5.5 g (0.1 to 0.2 oz).[3]

Distribution and habitat[edit]

Although Myotis alcathoe was initially known only from Greece and Hungary and was thought to be restricted to southeastern Europe, records since then have greatly expanded its range, and it is now known from Spain and England to Sweden and European Turkey.[35] In several European countries, focused searches were conducted to detect its occurrence.[36] Its habitat generally consists of moist, deciduous, mature forest near streams, for example in ravines or in alluvial forest (forest near a river),[37] where there are many decaying trees that the bat can use as roosting sites.[38] In Germany, its preferred habitat consists of mixed deciduous forest.[39] In the south of the continent, it usually occurs in mountain ranges, but the factors affecting its distribution in the north are less well known. Its range appears to be similar in shape to those of the greater and lesser horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum and R. hipposideros) and Myotis emarginatus.[37] It may yet be found in other European countries, such as the Benelux countries, Ireland, and Moldova.[40] Although there are abundant records from some areas, such as France and Hungary, the species appears to be rare in most of its range.[41]

Known records are as follows:

Albania
A single specimen was caught in 2006 in a forest of planes (Platanus orientalis) and poplars (Populus spp.) next to a small stream. M. mystacinus was recorded at the same place.[42]
Austria
Three specimens of Myotis alcathoe were recorded in Burgenland, southeastern Austria, in 2006.[43] They were caught near fishponds in a region dominated by oak (Quercus petraea) and hornbeam (Carpinus betulus).[44]
Azerbaijan
The species was recorded around 2009.[45]
Belgium
The species is know from the 21 of July 2011 in two place around the city of Rochefort.[46]
Bulgaria
The species is known from six localities in the south and west of the country;[47] the first record dates from 2003.[48] Habitats include river and mountain forests.[47]
Caucasus
Bats collected in the Russian part of the Caucasus and in Abkhazia (a breakaway part of Georgia) from 2003 to 2009[49] may represent Myotis alcathoe. They are small and morphometrically distinct from other local Myotis mystacinus-like bats.[8] However, the identity of these bats has not been confirmed molecularly.[50]
Croatia
In 2003, Myotis alcathoe was recorded here on the basis of two specimens;[51] three additional specimens were found in 2004.[52]
Czech Republic
Here, the species was recorded at nine sites clustered in three regions, with the first record dating from 2001,[53] in addition to records from roadkilled specimens at three further sites.[54] The typical habitat was mature oak-hornbeam forest near water with dead, decaying trees,[55] at altitudes ranging from 170 to 390 m (558 to 1280 ft).[56] Both M. mystacinus and M. brandtii occur in some of the same places in this country.[55] M. alcathoe has a limited, patchy distribution within the country, but reaches a high abundance in suitable habitat.[57]
France
Myotis alcathoe was informally recognized in France in 2000 as a small Myotis similar to Myotis mystacinus, the "Murin cantalou"; in 2002, it was realized that this bat represents Myotis alcathoe.[58] A large number of sites are known, mostly in the north of the country. The species reaches altitudes of up to 2000 m (6562 ft). It is usually found close to water, but it has been found in a variety of habitats, including farmlands, swamps, forests, and wooden grounds. In late summer and autumn, it occurs in caves.[47]
Germany
The species is known from two different areas in the country. In 2005 and 2006, specimens were caught in an old moist forest near the Rhine in western Baden-Württemberg. Two other bats were found in highway tunnels close to this site.[59] The species is also known from the Kyffhäuser hill range of Thuringia in central Germany, an island of relatively warm habitat with some unusual wildlife. There, bats were caught near a spring in a karst landscape amid oak-dominated deciduous forest.[60] The species was also recorded in deciduous forest at a former Soviet military training site in eastern Thuringia.[61] Myotis alcathoe has also been recorded in the nearby states of Saxony-Anhalt and Saxony, where it occurs in mixed deciduous forest. Many Saxony-Anhalt records are from near water.[62] However, the species was also recorded in the center of the city of Chemnitz in Saxony.[63]
Greece
The species has been recorded in the Pindus and Rhodopi Mountains of central and northern Greece. Here, Myotis alcathoe is usually found in stands of plane or alder trees next to small streams in ravines. The bat hunts close to the trees, within the stand. It is often found together with the lesser horseshoe bat and with M. mystacinus.[64]
Hungary
Myotis alcathoe is not uncommon in the mountain forests of northeastern Hungary. It has been found at brooks and lakes in oak, beech, alder, and hornbeam (Carpinetum) forests at 230 to 670 m (750 to 2200 ft) altitude. Both M. brandtii and M. mystacinus occur together with M. alcathoe there.[65]
Italy
Myotis alcathoe has been recorded in beech forest in Majella National Park in the region of Abruzzo.[66] Additional specimens of Myotis alcathoe have been identified in Italy using molecular methods.[67] In December 2013 its presence has been confirmed in the protected area of Appennino Lucano National Park (Basilicata).[68][69][70]
Latvia
A small Myotis was captured at a cave in Latvia between 2007 and 2010; pending genetic testing, it is suspected to be M. alcathoe.[71]
Luxembourg
A single male was caught in 2011 and confirmed as M. alcathoe on the basis of genetic data. Elsewhere in the country it has been recorded on the basis of acoustic data.[72]
Poland
The species was recorded in four caves in southern Poland in 2005 and 2006,[65] and later at several other sites in the south of the country.[38] It is known from 182 to 1294 m (597 to 4245 ft) above sea level, most often in beech forest (Fagus sylvatica), but also in several other forest types.[73]
Romania
A single Myotis alcathoe was captured in 2007 in a nature reserve in the eastern Carpathians; the reserve contains riverine and conifer forest.[74] The species was additionally recorded in a forested valley containing a small stream in Alba County.[75]
Serbia
The species was reported on the basis of three specimens shortly before 2009, but is probably rare.[76]
Slovakia
Here, Myotis alcathoe is known from a single site, a cave in old deciduous forest at 525 m (1722 ft) altitude.[77]
Slovenia
A single specimen was recorded in Slovenia in 2007.[78]
Spain
In Catalonia, the species is known from six sites,[79] ranging from sea level to 1200 m (3900 ft) altitude. It is known in beech and riverine forest and was first recorded in 2006.[80] The species is known from three sites in La Rioja, where it was recorded in 2004, and occurs amidst beech and riverine forest at 790 to 1390 m (2590 to 4560 ft) altitude.[81] It has also been found at seven localities in Navarre, with the first record dating from 2004. There, it occurs in beech and oak forest at altitudes from 140 to 980 m (460 to 3220 ft).[82] In Galicia, it is known from three localities at 300 to 680 m (980 to 2230 ft) above sea level.[83]
Sweden
The species was recorded at five sites in the south of the country, starting in 2008, on the basis of echolocation calls.[84]
Switzerland
Myotis alcathoe has been recorded from the Col du Marchairuz in the Jura Mountains (canton of Vaud).[85]
Turkey
Eight individuals have been caught at three sites in close vicinity in the European part of the country[65] in 2006.[86]
Ukraine
In 2009, the possible occurrence of Myotis alcathoe in Ukraine was recorded.[87] In 2011, the species was definitively recorded there on the basis of two bats caught in the far southwest of the country in 2009.[88]
United Kingdom
Myotis alcathoe has been recorded in England since 2003, and is known from two swarming sites in the south and a third site in the north of the country.[89] The northern England site, in Ryedale, is in a protected area with many old trees, and the southern sites (in Sussex) are in woodland.[90]

The species is also known from Montenegro and possibly from Bosnia and Herzegovina.[1] Early records of Myotis ikonnikovi—now known to be an eastern Asian species—from Ukraine, Bulgaria, and Romania may also pertain to this species.[64] Because whiskered bats in many cases cannot easily be distinguished from each other without the use of genetic methods, some listings do not differentiate between them; records of Myotis alcathoe and/or M. mystacinus and/or (in some cases) M. brandtii have been reported from Bulgaria,[91] Belgium,[92] and Montenegro.[93]

Ecology and behavior[edit]

Myotis alcathoe is a rare species with narrow ecological requirements.[94] According to a study in the Czech Republic, the diet of Myotis alcathoe mostly consists of nematoceran flies, but caddisflies, spiders, small lepidopterans, and neuropterans are also taken.[95] The presence of spiders in the diet suggests that the species gleans prey from foliage. It forages mainly high in the canopy and over water,[57] and is often found in dense vegetation.[96] The parasitic mite Spinturnix mystacina has been found on M. alcathoe, and the mites on M. alcathoe, M. brandtii, and M. mystacinus are genetically closely related.[97] The bat fly Basilia mongolensis nudior has been recorded on M. alcathoe in Thuringia[98] and the tick Ixodes vespertilionis in Romania.[99] When caught, individuals of Myotis alcathoe are much calmer than M. mystacinus or M. brandtii.[100]

Myotis alcathoe lives in small groups.[101] In Greece, a maternity colony, containing three females and two juveniles, has been found in a plane tree.[64] Additional roosts were found high in oak trees in Baden-Württemberg[101] and Saxony-Anhalt.[39] Twenty-seven roosting sites have been found in the Czech Republic, all but one in trees (the last was in a concrete pole). Most of the tree roosts were in oaks (Quercus robur); others were in limes (Tilia cordata), birches (Betula pendula), and various other species.[102] Its strong preference for roosting sites in trees is unusual among European bats.[103] Roosts tend to be located high in the canopy,[104] and are often in old trees.[105] In summer, roosts may contain large groups of up to 80 individuals, but autumn roosts in the Czech Republic are occupied by smaller groups.[104] M. alcathoe swarms from late July to mid-September in southern Poland.[6]

In Saxony-Anhalt, the species forages deep in valleys when temperatures are above 10 °C (50 °F), but on warmer slopes or rocky areas when it is colder.[106] There, Myotis alcathoe is relatively easy to capture in August, because M. brandtii and M. mystacinus already start swarming in late July.[75] Although there are some records of Myotis alcathoe in caves during the winter, it is also possible that animals spend the winter in tree cavities, and whether swarming behavior occurs in Myotis alcathoe is unclear.[107] An animal found in a cave in Saxony-Anhalt in January was not sleeping deeply.[106] Reproduction may also take place in caves, but pregnant females have been found as late as June.[108] Relatively many juveniles are caught between July and September.[9] In England, one individual of M. alcathoe was captured in 2003 (and identified at the time as M. brandtii) and again in 2009.[109] Three individuals that were telemetrically tracked (in eastern France, Thuringia, and Baden-Württemberg, respectively) moved only 800 m (2600 ft), 935 m (3070 ft), and 1440 m (4720 ft) from their night quarters; M. brandtii and M. mystacinus tend to move over longer distances.[110] A study in Poland found frequent hybridization among M. alcathoe, M. brandtii, and M. mystacinus sharing the same swarming sites, probably attributable to male-biased sex ratios (1.7:1 in M. alcathoe), a polygynous mating system, and the high number of bats at swarming sites.[111] M. alcathoe showed a particularly high proportion of hybrids, perhaps because it occurs at lower densities than the other two species.[6]

Conservation status[edit]

Because Myotis alcathoe remains poorly known, it is assessed as "Data Deficient" on the IUCN Red List.[1] However, it may be endangered because of its narrow ecological preferences.[108] Reservoir construction may threaten the species' habitat in some places; two Greek sites where it has been recorded have already been destroyed.[64] Forest loss is another possible threat,[1] and the species may be restricted to undisturbed habitats.[112] Because of its patchy distribution and likely small population, it probably does not easily colonize new habitats.[108] The species is protected by national and international measures, but the IUCN Red List recommends further research on various aspects of the species as well as efforts to increase public awareness of the animal.[1] In addition, old forests need to be conserved and the species' cave roosts need to be protected.[113]

In Catalonia, the species is listed as "Endangered" in view of its apparent rarity there.[114] The Red List of Germany's Endangered Vertebrates lists Myotis alcathoe as "Critically Endangered" as of 2009.[115] In Hungary, where the species is probably not uncommon in suitable habitat,[116] it has been protected since 2005.[117] However, the species is declining there and is threatened by habitat loss and disturbance of caves.[118]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f Hutson et al., 2010
  2. ^ Niermann et al., 2007, p. 362
  3. ^ a b c Dietz et al., 2007, p. 230
  4. ^ von Helversen et al., 2001, p. 217; Voigt et al., 2009
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j von Helversen et al., 2001, p. 218
  6. ^ a b c Bogdanowicz et al., 2012, p. 7
  7. ^ Ruedi et al., 2002, p. 648; Benda et al., 2003a, p. 364
  8. ^ a b Gazaryan, 2009, p. 60
  9. ^ a b Ohlendorf and Funkel, 2008, p. 111
  10. ^ von Helversen et al., 2001, fig. 2; Mayer et al., 2007, fig. 1
  11. ^ Stadelmann et al., 2004, pp. 187–188
  12. ^ Spitzenberger et al., 2008, p. 7
  13. ^ a b von Helversen et al., 2001, p. 217
  14. ^ Dietz and von Helversen, 2004, p. 71; Benda, 2008, p. 107
  15. ^ Benda, 2008, p. 107
  16. ^ Dietz and von Helversen, 2004, p. 71
  17. ^ von Helversen et al., 2001, p. 218; Dietz and von Helversen, 2004, p. 42; Agirre-Mendi et al., 2004, pp. 53–54
  18. ^ a b Spitzenberger et al., 2008, p. 9
  19. ^ Benda et al., 2003a, p. 362
  20. ^ a b Dietz and von Helversen, 2004, p. 42
  21. ^ Pavlinić et al., 2012, p. 331; Bogdanowicz et al., 2012, table 1
  22. ^ a b Ruedi et al., 2002, p. 647
  23. ^ von Helversen, 2001, p. 1161
  24. ^ a b Bogdanowicz et al., 2012, table 1
  25. ^ Alcalde, 2010, p. 232; Agirre-Mendi et al., 2004, p. 54; Ruedi et al., 2002, p. 647
  26. ^ von Helversen, 2004, p. 1162
  27. ^ Pavlinić et al., 2012, p. 333
  28. ^ von Helversen, 2004, p. 1161; von Helversen et al., 2001, p. 218
  29. ^ von Helversen et al., 2001, pp. 219–220
  30. ^ von Helversen et al., 2001, pp. 221–222
  31. ^ Dietz et al., 2007, p. 231
  32. ^ von Helversen, 2004, p. 1167
  33. ^ Ohlendorf and Funkel, 2008, p. 109
  34. ^ von Helversen, pers. comm. in Skiba, 2003, p. 107
  35. ^ Niermann et al., 2007, p. 365; Jan et al., 2010; Ahlén, 2010
  36. ^ Ohlendorf and Hoffmann, 2009, p. 112; Lučan et al., 2009, p. 62
  37. ^ a b Niermann et al., 2007, p. 365
  38. ^ a b Bashta et al., 2011, p. 2
  39. ^ a b Ohlendorf and Funkel, 2008, p. 112
  40. ^ Niermann et al., 2007, p. 365; Dietz et al., 2007, pp. 231, 233; Jan et al., 2010, p. 471
  41. ^ Spitzenberger et al., 2008, p. 11
  42. ^ Niermann et al., 2007, pp. 362–363
  43. ^ Spitzenberger et al., 2008, p. 3
  44. ^ Spitzenberger et al., 2008, pp. 4–6
  45. ^ Rakhmatulina, 2010, p. 1
  46. ^ Wallonia, August 9, 2011: Discovery of a new kind of bat in Belgium
  47. ^ a b c Niermann et al., 2007, p. 363
  48. ^ Schunger et al., 2004, p. 325
  49. ^ Gazaryan, 2009, p. 51
  50. ^ Gazaryan, 2009, p. 61
  51. ^ Croatian Natural History Museum, 2005, p. 2
  52. ^ Pavlinić et al., 2012, p. 331
  53. ^ Lučan et al., 2009, p. 64
  54. ^ Řehák et al., 2008
  55. ^ a b Lučan et al., 2009, p. 69
  56. ^ Lučan et al., 2009, table 1; Řehák et al., 2008, pp. 465–466
  57. ^ a b Lučan et al., 2009, p. 68
  58. ^ Ruedi et al., 2002, p. 645
  59. ^ Brinkmann and Niermann, 2007, p. 197
  60. ^ Sauerbier et al., 2006; Niermann et al., 2007, p. 364; Schorcht et al., 2009
  61. ^ Prüger and Bergner, 2008, p. 115
  62. ^ Ohlendorf et al., 2008; Ohlendorf, 2009a, pp. 45–46
  63. ^ Ohlendorf et al., 2008, p. 115
  64. ^ a b c d von Helversen et al., 2001, p. 221
  65. ^ a b c Niermann et al., 2007, p. 364
  66. ^ Parco Nazionale della Majella, 2008
  67. ^ Galimberti et al., 2010
  68. ^ ANSA News
  69. ^ Appennino Lucano National Park news
  70. ^ De Pasquale, P. P., Galimberti, A. 2014
  71. ^ Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Latvia, 2010
  72. ^ Gessner, 2012, p. 138
  73. ^ Niermann et al., 2007, p. 364; Bashta et al., 2011, table 1
  74. ^ Jére and Dóczy, 2007, p. 179
  75. ^ a b Ohlendorf and Hoffmann, 2009, p. 112
  76. ^ Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning, Republic of Serbia, 2010, p. 4
  77. ^ Benda et al., 2003a, pp. 360–361
  78. ^ Presetnik et al., 2007, p. 99
  79. ^ Flaquer et al., 2010, table 1
  80. ^ Flaquer et al., 2010, p. 41
  81. ^ Agirre-Mendi et al., 2004, p. 54
  82. ^ Alcalde, 2010, pp. 227–229
  83. ^ Hermida et al., 2012, p. 15
  84. ^ Ahlén, 2010
  85. ^ Stadelmann et al., 2004, table 1, p. 187; von Helversen, 2004, p. 1164
  86. ^ Niermann et al., 2007, pp. 371–372
  87. ^ Zagorodnyuk and Dykyy, 2009
  88. ^ Bashta et al., 2011, p. 2, table 1
  89. ^ Jan et al., 2010, p. 471
  90. ^ Jan et al., 2010, p. 476
  91. ^ Benda et al., 2003b, pp. 288–290
  92. ^ Kervyn et al., 2009
  93. ^ Benda, 2004, p. 14
  94. ^ Brinkmann and Niermann, 2007, p. 199
  95. ^ Lučan et al., 2009, p. 66
  96. ^ von Helversen, 2004, p. 1164
  97. ^ Bruyndonckx et al., 2009, table 1, fig. 2
  98. ^ Heddergott, 2009
  99. ^ Mihalca et al., 2012, table 1
  100. ^ Ohlendorf and Funkel, 2008, pp. 109–110
  101. ^ a b Ohlendorf, 2009a, p. 46
  102. ^ Lučan et al., 2009, p. 65
  103. ^ Bashta et al., 2011, p. 4
  104. ^ a b Lučan et al., 2009, p. 67
  105. ^ Brinkmann and Niermann, 2007, p. 206
  106. ^ a b Ohlendorf, 2009b, p. 149
  107. ^ Ohlendorf, 2009b, pp. 154, 156; Dietz et al., 2007, p. 233
  108. ^ a b c Dietz et al., 2007, p. 234
  109. ^ Jan et al., 2010, p. 473
  110. ^ Schorcht et al., 2009, p. 126
  111. ^ Bogdanowicz et al., 2012, p. 8
  112. ^ Dietz et al., 2007, p. 233
  113. ^ Dietz et al., 2007, p. 235
  114. ^ Flaquer et al., 2010, p. 42
  115. ^ Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2010, p. 8
  116. ^ Ministry of Rural Development, 2010, p. 4
  117. ^ Ministry of Rural Development, 2010, p. 5
  118. ^ Ministry of Rural Development, 2010, p. 1

Literature cited[edit]

Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!