Overview

Distribution

National Distribution

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Year-round

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: (5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)) Peninsular Florida from about Gainesville south to Miami, but not found on the Florida Keys (Kimball, 1965). Current distribution uncertain, but possibly the same. Doulgas Ferguson and Tim McCabe could provide no recent records. Schweitzer has not seen specimens. Other recent collections need to be checked both regarding identity and range of this taxon.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

National NatureServe Conservation Status

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N3 - Vulnerable

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: GU - Unrankable

Reasons: Apparently no specimens collected in recent decades. Lack of current status information, potential and actual threats from agricultural conversion, especially citrus and pine plantations?, as well as housing and commercial development.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Comments: Threats include agricultural conversion, housing or commercial development of habitats, and lack of good current status information. More information is need on the species present status and precise whereabouts in order to be more precise about threats to the species.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: This name appears in various lists and Kimball (1965) cites Franclemont that it is a valid species. Forbes (1948) also notes that the usual application of the name to the red form of D. ranaeceps is wrong. This may be a synonym of D. robusta, at least as that name is applied by Kimball and most others. Both taxa appear to be confined to Florida or nearly so (Schweitzer, pers. comm.).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!