Overview

Brief Summary

Introduction

Cirroctopus antarctica was described from two octopods and is known only from these animals.

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comprehensive Description

Characteristics

  1. Shell

    Kubodera and Okutani (1986) descrive the shell as follows: "The [shell] is broadly U-shaped. both rami, particularly at postero-lateral portion, are widened The posteriormost connective of both rami seems to be weaker than the remaining area." The original drawing is seen below and a recent photograph of the same shell is seen on the right.

    Figure. The shell of C. antarctica, paratype. Left - Drawing from Kubodera and Okutani, 1986. Right - Photograph by T. Kubodera.

  2. Pigmentation

    The title photographs suggests that the oral surface of C. antarctica has the same odd pigmentation as C. glacialis.

  3. Measurements and counts
    Characters: Measurements in mm Holotype Paratype
    Sex ? Female
    Mantle length 91; 94 180
    Mantle width 95; 69 135
    Head width 45 100
    Fin length 80; 67 70
    Fin width 40; 30 33
    Lengths and counts Left/Right Left/Right
    Arms I 200/200; 232/245 310/300
    Arms II 220/220; 253/255 310/280
    Arms III 225/220; 235/231 320/350
    Arms IV 220/215; 236/230 300/260
    Web sector A 110 140
    Web sector B 105/95 160/160
    Web sector C 110/100 150/160
    Web sector D 110/105 160/155
    Web sector E 55 110
    Arm I sucker counts (right; left/right) 72; 55/65 76
    Arm II sucker counts 73; 64/64 73
    Arm III sucker counts 69; 58/65 78
    Arm IV sucker counts 73; 55/63 55+
    Measurements and counts to the left of the semicolon are from Kubodera and Okutani (1986) and those to the right of the semicolon are from O'Shea (1999).

Comments

Kubodera and Okutani stated that this species differed from C. mawsoni by having subequal arms (this character would also separates it from all other members of the genus which have distinctly shorter ventral arms). The two octopods in the type series of C. antarctica were not in good condition and arm measurements can be very inaccurate. Arm size, however, remains a possible distinguishing character. The authors state that this species differs from C. glacialis by the shell which is very broad in posterolateral regions and the "well chitinized" beak. There appears to be no real difference in beak chitinization. The shell, however, does pose a problem. A photograph (see above) of the same gladius no longer, at least, appears to be distinctive as originally described but does seem to differ in some respects to the shell of C. glacialis (see above). Unfortunately the degree of variation of the shell in both species is unknown. O'Shea (1999) considered this species to be a probable synonym of C. glacialis. We suspect that he is correct.

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution

Distribution

Type locality: 62° 59'S, 62° 09'W, 804 m depth. The paratype was collected at 61° 23'S, 55° 11'W, 509-525 m depth.

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Depth range based on 1831 specimens in 94 taxa.
Water temperature and chemistry ranges based on 1155 samples.

Environmental ranges
  Depth range (m): 0 - 50000
  Temperature range (°C): -0.359 - 29.325
  Nitrate (umol/L): 0.006 - 44.880
  Salinity (PPS): 31.235 - 38.698
  Oxygen (ml/l): 0.303 - 7.464
  Phosphate (umol/l): 0.006 - 3.294
  Silicate (umol/l): 0.693 - 178.507

Graphical representation

Depth range (m): 0 - 50000

Temperature range (°C): -0.359 - 29.325

Nitrate (umol/L): 0.006 - 44.880

Salinity (PPS): 31.235 - 38.698

Oxygen (ml/l): 0.303 - 7.464

Phosphate (umol/l): 0.006 - 3.294

Silicate (umol/l): 0.693 - 178.507
 
Note: this information has not been validated. Check this *note*. Your feedback is most welcome.
Public Domain

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Depth range based on 6 specimens in 2 taxa.
Water temperature and chemistry ranges based on 4 samples.

Environmental ranges
  Depth range (m): 18 - 2359
  Temperature range (°C): 14.203 - 27.398
  Nitrate (umol/L): 0.483 - 2.393
  Salinity (PPS): 35.461 - 38.792
  Oxygen (ml/l): 4.403 - 4.766
  Phosphate (umol/l): 0.077 - 0.286
  Silicate (umol/l): 1.934 - 3.646

Graphical representation

Depth range (m): 18 - 2359

Temperature range (°C): 14.203 - 27.398

Nitrate (umol/L): 0.483 - 2.393

Salinity (PPS): 35.461 - 38.792

Oxygen (ml/l): 4.403 - 4.766

Phosphate (umol/l): 0.077 - 0.286

Silicate (umol/l): 1.934 - 3.646
 
Note: this information has not been validated. Check this *note*. Your feedback is most welcome.
Public Domain

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Associations

Known predators

Octopus (octopuses) is prey of:
Scorpaena guttata
Scorpaenichthys marmoratus
Chondrichthyes
Scombridae
Actinopterygii
phytoplankton
Octopus
Decapoda
Stomatopoda
Anomura

Based on studies in:
USA: California, Southern California (Marine, Sublittoral)
Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico-Virgin Islands shelf (Reef)

This list may not be complete but is based on published studies.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© SPIRE project

Source: SPIRE

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Known prey organisms

Octopus (octopuses) preys on:
Actinopterygii
decomposers/microfauna
phytoplankton
organic stuff
Octopus
Decapoda
Stomatopoda
Anomura
Gastropoda
Scaphopoda
Neoloricata
Priapula
Polychaeta
Ophiuroidea
Bivalvia

Based on studies in:
Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico-Virgin Islands shelf (Reef)

This list may not be complete but is based on published studies.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© SPIRE project

Source: SPIRE

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Octopus cf. wolfi

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 0
Species: 4
Species With Barcodes: 1

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Octopus cf. bocki

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 0
Species: 2
Species With Barcodes: 1

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Octopus (genus)

Octopus is the largest genus of octopuses, comprising more than 100 species. These species are widespread throughout the world's oceans.

Species

The species listed above with an asterisk (*) are questionable and need further study to determine if they are valid species or synonyms.[citation needed]

References

  1. ^ Kaneko, N. & Kubodera, T. (2008). "Two new species of pygmy octopuses (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) from deep water off the Ryukyu Archipelago, southern Japan." Molluscan Research 28(3): 145–157.
  2. ^ a b c Huffard, C.L. 2007. Four new species of shallow water pygmy octopus (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) from the Kingdom of Tonga. Molluscan Research 27(3): 147–170.
  3. ^ Octopus hummelincki Adam, 1936 (Mollusca, Cephalopoda): specific name conserved
  4. ^ Leite, T. S.; Haimovici, M.; Molina, W.; Warnke, K. (2007). "Morphological and genetic description of Octopus insularis, a new cryptic species in the Octopus vulgaris complex (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) from the tropical southwestern Atlantic". Journal of Molluscan Studies 74 (1): 63–74. doi:10.1093/mollus/eym050.  edit
  5. ^ Octopus sp. 18 'Lembeh', BiolJLinnSoc93:23.
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Pinnoctopus

Pinnoctopus is a genus of octopuses in the family Octopodidae.

Species

Taxonomic note

ITIS treats Pinnoctopus as a synonym of Octopus Cuvier, 1797.

Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!