Overview
Brief Summary
Succinct
Trusted
Introduction
Sphagnum palustre is a semi-aquatic moss, often forming extensive mats in fens and bogs. Not altogether common because of its water requirements but often the most abundant plant in open, wet, acidic, nutrient poor sites.
One of 285 species of Spagnum, S. palustre may be a principle component in horticultural potting soils. Sometimes referred to as ‘peat moss, a common name for Sphagnum and other plants this plant is commercially collected for the horticultural trade because of their properties to hold up to 25% of their dry weight in water.
Reproduction is by fragmentation of the plant and production of spores. The spore capsules mature in the summer and are said to produce an audible popping sound when the capsule breaks open to release the wind dispersed spores.
Before the advent of modern medicine and antibiotics, Sphagnum, perhaps including S. palustre was used as compresses on wounds – its acidic properties serving as a natural antiseptic.
Trusted
Comprehensive Description
Distribution
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
-
Michaux, A. 1803. Fl. Bor.-Amer. 2 vol. Levrault, Paris & Strasbourg.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9020867
Trusted
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
-
Wijk, R. v. d., W. D. Margadant & P. A. Florschütz. 1959--1969. Index Muscorum Vol. 1--5. Regnum Veg. 17, 26, 33, 48, 65.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000071
Trusted
-
Wijk, R. v. d., W. D. Margadant & P. A. Florschütz. 1959--1969. Index Muscorum Vol. 1--5. Regnum Veg. 17, 26, 33, 48, 65.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000071
Trusted
Brazil (South America)
China (Asia)
Hawaiian Isl (Oceania)
Kazakhstan (Asia)
United States (North America)
Australia (Oceania)
Canada (North America)
Colombia (South America)
-
Forzza, R. C. & et al. 2010. 2010 Lista de espécies Flora do Brasil. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/2010/.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/100002289
-
Worley, I. A. & Z. Iwatsuki. 1970. A checklist of the mosses of Alaska. Bryologist 73: 59–71.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9004707
-
Hilferty, F. J. 1960. The mosses of Massachusetts. A county catalogue with annotations. Rhodora 62: 145–173.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000087
-
Allen, B. 1999. Conspectus of the mosses of Central Asia. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9017841
-
McCleary, J. A. & J. P. L. Redfearn. 1979. Checklist of the mosses of Illinois. Trans. Illinois State Acad. Sci. 72: 28–51.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000054
-
Peck, J. H. 1978. A restatement of Conard's Iowa bryophyte flora with modern nomenclature, additional reports, and county dot maps Contr. Univ. Wisconsin-La Crosse Herb. 21. 90 pp.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000056
-
Mahler, W. F. 1980. The Mosses of Texas: a manuel of the flora with sketches SMU Herbarium. Pp. 1–147.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000079
-
Florschütz-de Waard, J. & P. A. Florschütz. 1979. Estudios sobre criptógamas Colombianas III. Lista comentada de los musgos de Colombia. Bryologist 82: 215–259.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000043
-
Ketchledge, E. H. 1980. Revised checklist of the moses of New York State. New York State Mus. Bull. 440.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000060
-
Bowers, F. D. & S. K. Freckmann. 1979. Atlas of Wisconsin bryophytes Rep. Fauna Fl. Wisconsin. 16. 135 pp.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000061
-
Crum, H. 1983. Mosses Great Lakes Forest (ed. 3) 417 pp. University Herbarium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000304
-
Gao Chien. 1994. Fl. Bryophyt. Sin. 1. Sphagnales, Andreaeales, Archidiales, Dicranales. 368 pp. Science Press, Beijing.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9015584
-
Staples, G. W., C. T. Imada, W. J. Hoe & C. W. Smith. 2004. A revised checklist of Hawaiian mosses. Trop. Bryol. 25: 35–70.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9028349
-
Dalton, P. J., R. D. Seppelt & A. M. Buchanan. 1991. An annotated checklist of Tasmanian mosses. Pp. 15–32. In M. R. Banks, S. J. Smith, A. E. Orchard & G. Kantvilas Asp. Tasmanian Bot. Royal Society of Tasmania, Hobart.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9011830
-
Breil, D. A. 1973. Mosses of Virginia: a provisional key to the genera. Longwood College 21 pp.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000051
-
Lampton, R. K. 1970. Mosses of Georgia. A check list of species which have been collected within the State. Bull. Georgia Acad. Sci. 28: 81–98.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000052
-
Breen, R. S. 1963. Mosses Florida xliv + 273 pages. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000049
-
Wilkes, J. C. J. 1965. A check list of the mosses of Alabama. J. Alabama Acad. Sci. 36: 75–93.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000053
-
Snider, J. A., S. M. Studlar & M. Medley. 1986. A Checklist of Bryophytes of Kentucky. 32 pp.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000086
-
Allen, B. H. 1987. Mosses from the state of Maine. Evansia 4: 17–20.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9003793
-
Stoneburner, A. & R. Wyatt. 1979. Three Big Thicket bryophytes new to Texas. Bryologist 82: 491–493.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9004104
-
Dirig, R. 1986. Sphagnum of the southwestern Catskills, Hancock Town, Delaware County, New York. Evansia 3: 4–7.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000073
-
Andrus, R. E. & D. A. Wilcox. 1985 [1986]. New Records for Sphagnum in Indiana. Michigan Bot. 24: 147–152.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000088
-
Karlin, E. F. & R. E. Andrus. 1986. Sphagnum vegetation of the low shrub bogs of northern New Jersey and adjacent New York. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 113: 281–287. 1 fig. 2 tab.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9002062
-
Gauthier, R. 1986. Some Sphagnum from Great Wass Island, Maine. Evansia 3: 17–20.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9001338
-
Wyatt, R., D. M. Lane & A. Stoneburner. 1980. Additions to the Sphagnum flora of Texas. Bryologist 83: 247–249.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9004105
-
Flora of North America Editorial Committee. 2007. Bryophytes: Mosses. 27(1): i–xxi, 1–711. In Fl. N. Amer. Oxford University Press, New York.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9034804
-
Karlin, E. F. & R. E. Andrus. 1995. The Sphagna of Hawaii. Bryologist 98: 235–238.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9015247
Trusted
-
Redfearn, P. L. J. & P. c. Wu. 1986. Catalog of the mosses of China. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73: 177–208.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000050
-
Wijk, R. v. d., W. D. Margadant & P. A. Florschütz. 1959--1969. Index Muscorum Vol. 1--5. Regnum Veg. 17, 26, 33, 48, 65.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9000071
Trusted
National Distribution
Canada
Origin: Unknown/Undetermined
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Unknown/Undetermined
Confidence: Confident
United States
Origin: Unknown/Undetermined
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Unknown/Undetermined
Confidence: Confident
Trusted
Distribution
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Comments
Trusted
Description
- Flora of North America @ eFloras.org
Trusted
Size
Physical Description
Trusted
Diagnostic Description
Formal Description
Plants moderate-sized to robust, strong-stemmed, lax to somewhat compact, capitulum somewhat flattened to more typically compact and rounded; pale green to golden brown to pale brown with often a pinkish tinge; carpets to more or less compact, low to moderate sized hummocks. Stems brown, superficial cortical cells with spiral reinforcing fibrils visible, usually 2-4 pores per cell, comb-fibrils lacking on interior wall. Stem leaves to 1.7 × 1 mm, occasionally longer; rarely hemiisophyllous; hyaline cells non-ornamented, nonseptate. Branches long and tapering, leaves ± imbricate to spreading in shade forms. Branch fascicles with 2 spreading and 2 pendent branches. Branch stems with hyaline cells non-ornamented; no or weak funnel-like projections on the interior end walls, often with 1 large pore per cell on superficial cell walls. Branch leaves broadly ovate, 2.2 × 1.3 mm, hyaline cells non-ornamented, convex surface with elliptic pores along the commissures, chlorophyllous cells isosceles-triangular to ovate-triangular in transverse section and just enclosed to just exposed on the convex surface; end wall not thickened. Sexual condition dioicous. Capsule with numerous pseudostomata. Spores 24-33 µm, surface finely papillose to smooth, distal surface with distinct bifurcated Y-mark sculpture; proximal laesura more than 0.6 spore radius.
- Flora of North America Vol. 27: 53
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Where it Grows
Sphagnum palustre like most other spagnums grow in various wetlands, fens, bogs, or seepage areas where water is present most of the year. The conditions are frequently acidic and usually associated with areas of poor soils with poor nutrient content.
Trusted
Habitat
Trusted
Physiology and Cell Biology
Cell Biology
Chromosomal Data
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Molecular Biology
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Sphagnum palustre
Public Records: 2
Species: 2
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems
Benefits
Ethnobotany
Painter, Terence J. 2003. Concerning the wound-healing properties of Sphagnum holocellulose: the Maillard reaction in pharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 88: 145-148.
Sphagnum wound dressings can be 3–4 times as aborbent as cotton equivalents, but they also react chemically with proteins of all kinds. This reactivity gives them the potential of immobilizing whole bacterial cells as well as the enzymes, exotoxins, and lysins secreted by the most invasive pathogens. Once immobilized, enzymes and (by inference) exotoxins and lysins are rapidly inactivated by a Maillard reaction. The complex pectin in Sphagnum is structurally similar to known, immunostimulatory pectins from other plants, including some that are traditionally used for wound healing.
Sphagnum paluste as herbal extract.
Trusted
Wikipedia
Sphagnum palustre
Sphagnum palustre is a species of moss from the genus Sphagnum, in the family Sphagnaceae.
| This bryophyte-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
Unreviewed
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!



