Overview
Comprehensive Description
Description
- Seigel, R. A. and Dodd, C.K., Jr. (2001). ''Translocations of amphibians: proven management method or experimental technique?'' Conservation Biology, 16(2), 552-554.
- Brown, L. E. (1963). ''Bufo houstonensis.'' Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, 133.1-133.2.
Trusted
Distribution
Range Description
Trusted
Geographic Range
The Houston toad is limited to an extremely small range in southeastern Texas. Since its discovery in 1953 it has never been found north of Burleson County, south of Fort Bend County, east of Liberty County, or west of Bastrop County.
Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native )
Trusted
National Distribution
United States
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
Trusted
Global Range: (1000-5000 square km (about 400-2000 square miles)) Historically, this toad ranged across the central coastal region of Texas. Houston toads disappeared from the Houston area (Harris, Fort Bend and Liberty counties) during the 1960s following an extended drought and the rapid urban expansion of the city of Houston. Although this species has been found in nine additional counties (Austin, Bastrop, Burleson, Colorado, Lavaca, Lee, Leon, Milam, Robertson) as recently as the 1990s, several of these populations have not been seen since they were first discovered (recorded in Lee County in 2001; Gaston et al. 2001). Of the few remaining populations, the largest is in Bastrop County.
Trusted
Distribution and Habitat
- Seigel, R. A. and Dodd, C.K., Jr. (2001). ''Translocations of amphibians: proven management method or experimental technique?'' Conservation Biology, 16(2), 552-554.
- Brown, L. E. (1963). ''Bufo houstonensis.'' Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, 133.1-133.2.
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Physical Description
The upper part of Houston toads is usually light brown in color, though it may sometimes be reddish. It possesses a variable number of dark brown or black spots. The underbelly is cream colored and usually very mottled. There is always at least one brown spot on the pectoral region. Females are 52-80 mm long (snout to vent). Males are smaller, being 45-70 mm long. Tadpoles are 13.7-22 mm long. Tadpole bodies and the upper 75% of their tails are heavily pigmented.
Trusted
Size
Type Information
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Amphibians & Reptiles
Preparation: Ethanol
Year Collected: 1952
Locality: Fairbanks, Harris, Texas, United States, North America
- Paratype: Sanders, O. 1953. Herpetologica. 9: 27.
Trusted
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Amphibians & Reptiles
Preparation: Ethanol
Year Collected: 1952
Locality: Fairbanks, Harris, Texas, United States, North America
- Paratype: Sanders, O. 1953. Herpetologica. 9: 27.
Trusted
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Amphibians & Reptiles
Preparation: Ethanol
Year Collected: 1952
Locality: Fairbanks, Harris, Texas, United States, North America
- Paratype: Sanders, O. 1953. Herpetologica. 9: 27.
Trusted
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Amphibians & Reptiles
Preparation: Ethanol
Year Collected: 1952
Locality: Fairbanks, Harris, Texas, United States, North America
- Paratype: Sanders, O. 1953. Herpetologica. 9: 27.
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Habitat and Ecology
Systems
- Terrestrial
Trusted
Habitat
Tadpoles are found in non-flowing pools that last for at least 60 days. Adults are restricted to sandy soils and prefer wooded areas interspersed with open grass. They are also found in coastal prairies. Within these habitats they are never far from water, and during the breeding season are located almost exclusively near ponds and rain pools.
Terrestrial Biomes: savanna or grassland ; forest
Trusted
Comments: Restricted to areas with soft sandy soils; pine forest, mixed deciduous forest, coastal prairie. Extant populations occur in sandy forested areas with pine. When inactive, occupies burrows in soil or seeks refuge in leaf litter or under objects.
Eggs and larvae develop in shallow water of roadside ditches, temporary ponds in residential areas and pastures, and other seasonally flooded low spots; for successful breeding, water must persist for at least 60 days.
Trusted
Migration
Non-Migrant: No. All populations of this species make significant seasonal migrations.
Locally Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.
Migrates between breeding and nonbreeding habitats.
Trusted
Trophic Strategy
Food Habits
Tadpoles feed primarily on pollen (usually from nearby pines), the jelly envelopes of other recently hatched Houston toads, and algae on floating leaves. Adults feed primarily on ground beetles, although they have been known to eat smaller toads and ants. They utilize two methods to capture prey: sit-and-wait and active search. For the sit-and-wait method, A. houstonensis first digs a small depression in the soil with its powerful hind legs. The toad then rests in the depression and scans the surrounding area for movement. When prey is detected B. Houstonensis leaps forwards and takes the prey into its mouth. Depressions are abandoned many times per day and new ones dug nearby.
Trusted
Comments: Metamorphosed toads probably eat various small terrestrial arthropods. Larvae eat suspended material, organic debris, algae, and plant tissue.
Trusted
Population Biology
Number of Occurrences
Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.
Estimated Number of Occurrences: 1 - 20
Comments: Difficult to specify number, but relatively few occurrences.
Trusted
Global Abundance
1000 - 2500 individuals
Comments: At least 2000 adults occur in Bastrop County; unknown numbers in 7 other counties (http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/nature/endang/htoad.htm). Fairly common in the vicinity of a few ponds (Bartlett and Bartlett 1999).
Trusted
Life History and Behavior
Cyclicity
Comments: Inactive during hot, dry season and during coldest months.
Trusted
Reproduction
Reproduction
Breeding occurs between the end of January and the end of June, but peaks in late February. Early breeding often begins when the prior 24-hour period's temperature has not fallen below 14 degrees C. Mating occurs at night near shallow pools of water or ponds. Males begin their mating calls twenty minutes before sunset while still in their burrows. After ten minutes they begin moving toward a breeding pond, arriving between sunset and midnight. Once there, they seek elevated places from which to call. This call consists of a long high pitched trill. The first females begin arriving several hours after sunset. Once a female has selected a mate, the male remains clasped to the female for at least six hours. Between 500 and 6000 eggs are laid and fertilized in the water during the early morning hours. Afterwards males issue a release call consisting of a short barely audible release vibration, and an even shorter release chirp. Eggs hatch in seven days and metamorphosis begins in 60-65 days. Males reach sexual maturity in 1 year, and females at 1-2 years. Males typically breed for 2 seasons; females, for at least as long.
Trusted
Most breeding occurs February-April, when minimum air temperature is above 14 C; breeding reported as late as June. Larvae hatch in 4-7 days, metamorphose in 3-9 weeks, depending on water temperature. Males sexually mature in 1 year, females possibly in 2 years. See Jacobson (1989).
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
IUCN Red List Assessment
Red List Category
Red List Criteria
Version
Year Assessed
Assessor/s
Reviewer/s
Justification
History
- 1996Endangered
- 1994Endangered(Groombridge 1994)
- 1990Endangered(IUCN 1990)
- 1988Endangered(IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1988)
- 1986Endangered(IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1986)
Trusted
Conservation Status
Throughout the 1950s the Houston toad's populations declined sharply. Regional drought was the largest contributor to this, followed by loss of suitable habitat due to land development. Soil erosion, cattle grazing, and pesticide run-off have all limited the number of suitable breeding ponds. Conservation efforts have attempted to counter habitat loss. Most notably have been two land purchases in the 1970s. In 1971 the University of Texas Environmental Science Department purchased 1400 acres of forested land adjacent to Bastrop State Park to use as a study area. In 1979 the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department purchased another 717 acres. In 1974 the Houston toad was listed as an Endangered Species, and a recovery plan was created. Its goal is the removal of A. houstonensis from the endangered species list through habitat expansion and enhancement.
US Federal List: endangered
CITES: no special status
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: endangered
Trusted
National NatureServe Conservation Status
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: N1 - Critically Imperiled
Trusted
NatureServe Conservation Status
Rounded Global Status Rank: G1 - Critically Imperiled
Reasons: Small range in Texas; populations are few, small, and declining, due mainly to habitat destruction.
Intrinsic Vulnerability: Moderately vulnerable
Environmental Specificity: Moderate to broad.
Trusted
Status: Endangered
Date Listed: 10/13/1970
Lead Region: Southwest Region (Region 2)
Where Listed:
Population detail:
Population location: entire
Listing status: E
For most current information and documents related to the conservation status and management of Bufo houstonensis , see its USFWS Species Profile
Trusted
Trends
Population
Population Trend
Trusted
Global Short Term Trend: Decline of 10-50%
Comments: Recent trend analyses suggest that Houston toads are declining in Bastrop State Park, which lies near the center of its critical habitat in Bastrop County.
Global Long Term Trend: Increase of 10-25% to decline of 70%
Comments: This species is believed to have undergone a substantial decline in range extent, area of occupnacy, population size, and habitat qunatity and quality.
Trusted
Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors
- Seigel, R. A. and Dodd, C.K., Jr. (2001). ''Translocations of amphibians: proven management method or experimental technique?'' Conservation Biology, 16(2), 552-554.
- Brown, L. E. (1963). ''Bufo houstonensis.'' Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, 133.1-133.2.
Trusted
Threats
Threats
Trusted
Degree of Threat: A : Very threatened throughout its range communities directly exploited or their composition and structure irreversibly threatened by man-made forces, including exotic species
Comments: Habitat conversion poses the most serious threat to the Houston toad. Several populations were eliminated with the expansion of Houston, and the largest remaining population in Bastrop County is also under intense and immediate threat from urban development.
Many Houston toads are killed each year by automobiles. Roadway mortality will increase as human populations continue to increase within the species¿ habitat and as the habitat continues to be dissected by more roads. Road construction further isolates populations and disrupts or prevents the movement of individual toads between populations. This movement of toads is necessary to maintain gene flow, and thus genetic diversity, and to supplement small or declining local populations. It is possible to build roads with underpasses or other structures that allow toads and other wildlife to pass safely beneath the roads.
While converting woodlands to pastures or plowed fields destroys Houston toad habitat and favors the proliferation of other toad species, certain agricultural practices can be beneficial to Houston toads. These include maintaining low to moderate numbers of livestock to avoid overgrazing, protecting pond habitat from livestock and predatory fishes, planting native bunchgrasses instead of sod-forming grasses, such as Bermuda grass, which are difficult for the toads to move through, and conserving large blocks of woodlands.
Certain forestry practices may benefit the Houston toad, while others, such as clearcutting, are harmful. Thinning and burning have been shown to benefit some species of amphibians and reptiles by opening up the forest canopy and allowing more sunlight to reach the forest floor. This practice encourages the growth of vegetation and, in turn, increases insect numbers. This may be beneficial to the Houston toad.
Other threats that often appear in conjunction with the factors outlined above include drought and the presence of fire ants, an unwelcome species from Brazil. Fire ants have been observed preying on toadlets as they leave their breeding pond. Fire ants thrive in open, sunny areas where the soil has been disturbed and woody vegetation uprooted, as in agricultural fields and urban areas. Protecting large forested areas is one of the most effective deterrents to fire ants. Where fire ant control with pesticides is necessary, mounds should be treated individually, rather than broadcasting the chemicals, to avoid impacting other invertebrates that the Houston toad eats.
This information is from a USFWS website: http://ifw2es.fws.gov/HoustonToad.
Trusted
Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors
- Seigel, R. A. and Dodd, C.K., Jr. (2001). ''Translocations of amphibians: proven management method or experimental technique?'' Conservation Biology, 16(2), 552-554.
- Brown, L. E. (1963). ''Bufo houstonensis.'' Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, 133.1-133.2.
Trusted
Management
Conservation Actions
Trusted
Management Research Needs: Research is urgently needed to determine the status of Houston toad populations outside of Bastrop County and promote conservation efforts in these areas. Research is also critical to determine which management practices are most conducive to the Houston toad and the ecosystem on which it depends.
Trusted
Global Protection: Few (1-3) occurrences appropriately protected and managed
Comments: Several breeding sites are on protected park lands (Bartlett and Bartlett 1999). Occurs in a state park in Bastrop County. Critical habitat was designated in 1978 in Bastrop and Burleson counties, in areas supporting the largest populations known at that time. The population within critical habitat in Burleson County has not been seen since 1983. The University of Texas Environmental Science Park, comprising several hundred hectares, is managed as toad habitat.
Needs: Protect several EOs in widespread areas to preserve genetic diversity of population.
Trusted
Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems
Benefits
Economic Importance for Humans: Positive
Besides the aesthetics of the Houston toad's bell-like calls (perhaps appreciated only by enthusiasts), it has little economic value to humans. Although Houston toads do limit insect populations, other more abundant sympatric toad species also fulfill this role.
Trusted
Wikipedia
Houston toad
| This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2009) |
The Houston toad (Bufo houstonensis) is an endangered species of amphibian that is endemic to Texas in the United States.[3] This toad was discovered in the late 1940s and named in 1953. Official estimates are that just 3,000 – 4,000 adult Houston toads are left in the world.
Contents |
Characteristics
The male Houston toad grows to 2–3.5 inches when mature with the female being larger and bulkier. Although generally brown and speckled, their color can range from black to purplish gray, sometimes with green patches. The toads typically live 2–3 years and create burrows for protection from the cold in the winter and the hot, dry conditions of the summer. They are nocturnal and feed on insects and small invertebrates.
During February and March, the male emits a high clear trill by distending a vocal sac on its throat, in hopes of attracting a mate. A female will choose a male based on certain characteristics of his call. Small isolated pools and ponds are the toad's main breeding ground. A female toad will lay several thousand eggs in long single-egg strands that are fertilized externally by the male as they are laid. The eggs hatch within seven days and tadpoles take between 15–100 days to turn into little toads. The toadlets then leave the breeding pond and begin to forage for prey such as ants, beetles and moths.
They move by making short hops. Since they cannot usually outrun their predators such as snakes, turtles, large birds, raccoons, and other frogs, the toads have developed coloration and rough skin to camouflage themselves. Also, their skin secretes chemicals that are distasteful, and sometimes poisonous, to predators. In addition to protecting the Houston toad from being eaten, some of these chemicals have proven useful medicines to treat heart and nervous disorders in humans.
Habitat and range
The Houston toad today lives exclusively in pine and oak woodlands and savanna with forbs and bunchgrasses present in open areas. Vegetation of its preferred habitat includes loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), post oak (Quercus stellata), bluejack oak (Quercus incana), yaupon holly (Ilex vomitoria), curly threeawn (Aristida desmantha), and little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium). They are generally found in areas with loose, sandy soils greater than 40 in (100 cm) in depth. Slow-moving or still bodies of water that last at least 30 days are needed for breeding and tadpole development.[4] The toad's original range covered 12 counties in Texas; currently, it is often reported to occur in nine counties. However, choruses have only been actually reported in three counties since 2000, representing a seventy-five percent overall reduction in twenty years.
Conservation status
In 1970, the Houston toad was federally listed as an endangered species.[4] It was extirpated from the Houston, Texas area by the 1960s, likely coincident with the severe drought of the 1950s and concurrent development of its forested habitat in that region. Though the largest and most immediate threat is habitat loss, the reduced toad populations are also vulnerable to automobiles, predators, pesticides and drought.
The largest known chorusing groups persist in Bastrop County, but the choruses monitored in Bastrop State Park showed a dramatic decline during the mid-1990s, with little recovery of those numbers since then. Importantly, that state park is the only public land that supports consistent chorusing from year to year of the Houston toad. However, even there, the total numbers are very low.
Conservation groups are working with private landowners in Bastrop County to protect and restore Houston toad habitat, but even if recovery were to be achieved in Bastrop County, this effort would not have achieved recovery for the species. Efforts toward active conservation efforts in the remaining Houston toad occupied counties and even efforts within counties from which the toad has been extirpated are needed.
In spring 2008, the Lost Pines Habitat Conservation Plan was approved by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. The plan describes a management and recovery plan for the Houston toad in designated habitat in Bastrop County.
In September, 2011, the Bastrop County Complex fire devastated a large part of the Houston toad's habitat. Parts of Buescher State Park were among the affected areas,[5] with large forested areas charred by the fire. The Lost Pines Forest was heavily affected by the fire.
References
- ^ Hammerson & Shepard (2004). Bufo houstonensis. 2006. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN 2006. www.iucnredlist.org. Retrieved on 11 May 2006. Database entry includes a range map, a brief justification of why this species is endangered, and the criteria used
- ^ "Anaxyrus houstonensis". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=773522. Retrieved 2010-11-05.
- ^ Jackson, Jacob T.; Floyd W. Weckerly, Todd M. Swannack (2006). "Inferring Absence of Houston Toads Given Imperfect Detection Probabilities". Journal of Wildlife Management 70 (5): 1461–1463. JSTOR 4128067.
- ^ a b "Houston Toad" (PDF). Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/publications/pwdpubs/media/pwd_bk_w7000_0013_houston_toad.pdf. Retrieved 2010-11-05.
- ^ "Around Central Texas, residents find some homes burned, others saved". The Austin American-Statesman. 2011-09-06. http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2011/09/06/in_bastrop_a_thick_haze.html. Retrieved 2011-09-08. "Charred trees smolder at Buescher State Park on Park Road 1C in Bastrop County on Tuesday."
Further reading
- Hillis, D. M., A. M. Hillis, and R. F. Martin. (1984) Reproductive ecology and hybridization of the endangered Houston toad (Bufo houstonensis). Journal of Herpetology 18: 56–72.
- "The Endangered Houston Toad". U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Retrieved Nov. 17, 2005.
- Pauly, G. B., D. M. Hillis, and D. C. Cannatella. (2004) The history of a Nearctic colonization: Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of the Nearctic toads (Bufo). Evolution 58: 2517–2535.
- "Houston Toad". Environmental Defense. Retrieved Nov. 17, 2005.
Unreviewed
Names and Taxonomy
Taxonomy
Comments: Treated as a subspecies of B. americanus in older literature. Natural hybridization with B. valliceps and with B. woodhousii has been recorded (Brown 1973). A study of the taxonomic relationship between B. houstonensis and B. americanus charlesmithi was underway in 1990 (USFWS 1990).
Trusted
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!



