Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (3) (learn more)
Overview
Brief Summary
Description
Links:
Mammal Species of the World
Click here for The American Society of Mammalogists species account
- Original description: Audubon, J. J., and J. Bachman,, 1851. The viviparous quadrupeds of North America, p. 297. V.G. Audubon, New York, 2:1-334.
Trusted
Biology
Trusted
Comprehensive Description
Description
Trusted
Distribution
Geographic Range
Historically, Mustela nigripes ranged throughout the interior regions of North America, from southern Canada to northern Mexico. Mustela nigripes is the only ferret that is native to North America. Today, Mustela nigripes exists in the wild in three locations, northeastern Montana, western South Dakota, and southeastern Wyoming. All three locations are sites where they have been reintroduced after the original populations were extirpated. Mustela nigripes populations also exist in seven zoos and breeding facilities (Massicot 2000, Wilson & Ruff 1999, Nowak 1991, Hillman & Clark 1980).
Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native )
Trusted
Range
Trusted
Range Description
Trusted
National Distribution
Canada
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Absent
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
United States
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
Trusted
Global Range: (<100-250 square km (less than about 40-100 square miles)) The range formerly encompassed a large area of the Great Plains, mountain basins, and semi-arid grasslands of North America. Subsequently the species was extirpated virtually everywhere. The last known wild population existed in the vicinity of Meeteetse, Wyoming, until early 1987. Ferrets from that area were captured and used for captive breeding. The species was reintroduced in Shirley Basin, Wyoming, in the early 1990s; since then it has also been reintroduced in South Dakota, Montana, Arizona, Utah, Colorado, and Chihuahua (Federal Register, 13 April 1993, 27 June 1994, 18 August 1994, 20 March 1996, 29 April 1997; Bard 2002).
Trusted
Western U.S.A., western Canada
Chihuahua,Mexico. Presumed to be extirpated in other States of range and Canada
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Physical Description
Female black-footed ferrets range in weight from 645 to 850 grams, while the weight of males ranges from 915 to 1,125grams. Mustela nigripes ranges in length from 380 to 600mm (head and body). In linear measurements, male black-footed ferrets are generally 10% larger than females. The fur of Mustela nigripes is yellowish-buff with pale underparts. The forehead, muzzle, and throat are white; while the feet are black. A black mask is observed around the eyes, which is well defined in young black-footed ferrets (Massicot 2000, Wilson & Ruff 1999, Nowak 1991, Hillman & Clark 1980).
Range mass: 645 to 1125 g.
Trusted
Size
Size in North America
Average: 534 mm males; 501 mm females
Range: 490-600 mm males; 479-518 mm females
Weight:
Average: 1,034 g males; 703 g females
Range: 915-1,034 g males; 645-850 g females
Trusted
Diagnostic Description
Weasels are brown above and whitish or yellowish below; mink is almost entirely dark brown to black; weasels and mink lack the dark mask.
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Habitat and Ecology
Systems
- Terrestrial
Trusted
Habitat
Black-footed ferrets can be found in the short or middle grass prairies and rolling hills of North America. Each ferret typically needs about 100-120 acres of space upon which to forage for food. They live within the abandoned burrows of prairie dogs and use these complex underground tunnels for shelter and hunting. A mother with a litter of three would need approximately 140 acres to survive (Massicot 2000, Nowak 1991).
Terrestrial Biomes: savanna or grassland
Trusted
Comments: This species is limited to open habitat, the same habitat used by prairie dogs: grasslands, steppe, and shrub steppe. Resting and birthing sites are in underground burrows, generally made by prairie dogs. It has been estimated that about 40-60 hectares of prairie dog colony are needed to support one ferret. See Biggins et al. (in Oldemeyer et al. 1993) for information on evaluating areas as potential ferret habitat; factors include size of prairie dog complex, prairie dog population density, spatial arrangement of prairie dog colonies, potential for disease in prairie dogs and ferrets, potential for prairie dog expansion, abundance of predators, future resource conflicts and ownership stability, and public and landowner attitudes.
Trusted
Habitat
Trusted
Migration
Non-Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species do not make significant seasonal migrations. Juvenile dispersal is not considered a migration.
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.
Trusted
Trophic Strategy
Food Habits
Black-footed ferrets rely primarily on prairie dogs for food. However, they sometimes eat mice, ground squirrels, and other small animals. Normally, over 90% of a black-footed ferret's diet consists of prairie dogs, which are hunted and killed within their burrows. A black-footed ferret typically consumes between 50-70 grams of meat per day. It has been observed that black-footed ferrets only kill enough to eat, and caches of stored food are not usually found (Massicot 2000, Wilson & Ruff 1999, Nowak 1991, Hillman & Clark 1980).
Trusted
Comments: Prairie dogs are an important food source; one study (N=82) found prairie dog remains in 91% of analyzed ferret scats (Hillman and Clark 1980). Alternate prey probably eaten when necessary, (e.g., ground squirrels, cottontail rabbits, deer mice). Owen et al. (2000) point out that Pleistocene populations M. NIGRIPES did not need prairie dogs to survive; many fossil sites are associated with abundant ground squirrel (Spermophilus) remains, with no evidence of prairie dogs.
Trusted
Population Biology
Number of Occurrences
Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.
Estimated Number of Occurrences: 6 - 20
Comments: At present, populations exist at several reintroduction sites in Wyoming, South Dakota, Montana, Arizona, Utah, Colorado, and Chihuahua (USFWS 2000, Bard 2002).
Trusted
Global Abundance
250 - 1000 individuals
Comments: This species was nearly extinct in the late 1980s. Captive breeding has been successful. Several hundred individuals exist in captivity and in reintroduced populations in several states and Mexico (Bard 2002). As of late 2005, a total of about 400 were alive in the wild in all the states where releases have occurred.
Trusted
General Ecology
Secretive, rarely observed except at night. Probably solitary except during breeding season. Closely associated with prairie dogs. May range over area of up to 100 ha during 3-8 day period in winter (Rickart 1987). Two reintroduced ferrets in Shirley Basin moved three and five miles before settling. See Forrest et al. 1988 for population attributes of Meeteetse colony, 1981-1985.
Trusted
Life History and Behavior
Cyclicity
Comments: Less active in winter; inactive for periods of up to 6 nights and days (Rickart 1987).
Trusted
Life Expectancy
Lifespan/Longevity
Average lifespan
Status: captivity: 12.0 years.
Trusted
Lifespan, longevity, and ageing
Trusted
Reproduction
Reproduction
Females become sexually mature at the age of one year. The breeding season typically extends through March and April. The gestation period ranges from 35-45 days. Litters range from 1-6 young, with an average litter size of 3.5 young. Young remain in the burrow for about 42 days before coming aboveground. During the summer months of July and August females and their young stay together, in the fall they separate as the young ferrets reach their independence. Females ferrets have three pairs of mammae. Ferrets are sexually dimorphic, with males being larger than the female. During the mating season, females aggressively solicit males. Black-footed ferrets exhibit a phenomenon known as "delayed implantation," in which the fertilized egg does not start developing until conditions are appropriate for gestation (Massicot 2000, Wilson & Ruff 1999, Nowak 1991, Hillman & Clark 1980).
Average gestation period: 43 days.
Average number of offspring: 3.
Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male)
Sex: male: 365 days.
Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)
Sex: female: 365 days.
Trusted
In captivy, copulation occurred in March and early April. Gestation was 42 and 45 days for 1 female in 2 breeding seasons. In wild, litter size in South Dakota averaged 3.5 (range 1-5) (Hillman and Clark 1980), 3.3 at emergence in Wyoming (Forrest et al. 1988). Young appear above ground usually in July, disperse in fall. At least some females reproduce as yearlings (Forrest et al. 1988).
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
Conservation Status
The spread of cattle ranching, farming and urban development in the 20th Century in the Great Plains has greatly stressed the North American prairie ecosystem. Ranchers asserted that grazing by prairie dogs deprived cattle of much otherwise available forage and began a campaign to eradicate this ‘pest’ species through strychnine poisoning (Jachowski and Lockhart, 2009). Black-footed ferrets, being a highly specialized predator on prairie dogs thus declined. In 1964 black-footed ferrets were believed to be extinct when a remnant population was found in South Dakota (Howard et al, 2002). Captive breeding of animals from this population was attempted at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center in Maryland, but ultimately failed due to a flawed canine distemper vaccine and the disappearance of the wild population. In 1981the species was again believed extinct when a ranch dog near Meeteese,Wyoming brought home a dead ferret. From 1985 to 1987 the last 18 individuals were captured and brought into captivity, but only seven produced offspring. Since then the program has produced well over 6,000 animals. Over 3,000 captive-born ferrets have been released at 18 release sites ranging across the Great Plains and one in Mexico. Of these sites only two, Shirley Basin in Wyoming and Conata Basin in South Dakota, are showing a natural increase in population size. The ferret populations at the other sites may currently be too low to ensure survival into the future. Black-footed ferret prospects improve with larger habitat area and greater densities of prairie dogs. In addition diseases, such as plague or canine distemper, can wipe out ferrets locally. As of 2009 there are estimated to be over 800 black-footed ferrets in the wild, but only about 300 breeding adults (Jachowski and Lockhart, 2009).
Trusted
Conservation Status
Considered to be North America's rarest mammal. Black-footed ferrets have been heavily impacted by the extermination of prairie dogs. Ranchers poisoned prairie dogs because of destruction (tunneling and foraging) to rangelands. With the disappearance of prairie dogs, so too went black-footed ferrets. Numbers dropped to an astounding 31 in 1985, and by 1987 they were extinct in the wild. Of the original 100 million acres of black-footed ferret habitat, only 2 million acres remain. Many ferrets were also killed by a canine distemper epidemic that spread through the American grasslands.
Captive breeding and reintroduction programs are underway in several locations throughtout North America (Massicot 2000)
US Federal List: endangered
CITES: appendix i
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: endangered
Trusted
IUCN Red List Assessment
Red List Category
Red List Criteria
Version
Year Assessed
Assessor/s
Reviewer/s
Contributor/s
Justification
History
- 1996Extinct in the Wild
- 1994Endangered(Groombridge 1994)
- 1990Endangered(IUCN 1990)
- 1988Endangered(IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1988)
- 1986Endangered(IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1986)
- 1982Endangered(Thornback and Jenkins 1982)
Trusted
National NatureServe Conservation Status
Canada
Rounded National Status Rank: NX - Presumed Extirpated
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: N1 - Critically Imperiled
Trusted
NatureServe Conservation Status
Rounded Global Status Rank: G1 - Critically Imperiled
Reasons: Formerly widespread in central North America; virtually or actually exterminated from the wild by 1987, primarily as a result of prairie dog and predator control actions; captive breeding and reintroductions in several areas have been successful at establishing reproducing populations.
Trusted
Status: Endangered
Date Listed: 03/11/1967
Lead Region: Mountain-Prairie Region (Region 6)
Where Listed: entire population, except where EXPN
Status: Experimental Population, Non-Essential
Date Listed: 08/21/1991
Lead Region: Mountain-Prairie Region (Region 6)
Where Listed: U.S.A. (specific portions of AZ, CO, MT, SD, UT, and WY)
Population detail:
Population location: U.S.A. (specific portions of AZ, CO, MT, SD, UT, and WY, see 17.84(g))
Listing status: EXPN
Population location: Entire, except where listed as an experimental population below
Listing status: E
For most current information and documents related to the conservation status and management of Mustela nigripes , see its USFWS Species Profile
Trusted
Status
Trusted
Trends
Population
Reintroduction began in 1991 with the release of a group of ferrets into the Shirley Basin of Wyoming. Since 1987, over 6,000 ferret kits have been produced through captive breeding and since 1991, over 2,000 ferrets have been released at 18 sites. All populations are sampled and counted two times a year as part of a management and recovery protocol. There are currently (spring count 2008) nearly 300 ferrets in captivity and approximately 500 breeding adults in the wild, less than 250 of which were actually born in the wild. These minimum population estimates occur in the spring. Maximum population estimates occur in the fall, include young of the year, and consist of an estimated 1,000 ferrets in the wild and 300 captive adults.
Population Trend
Trusted
Global Short Term Trend: Increase of 10 to >25%
Comments: Captive and wild populations have increased to several hundred individuals (Bard 2002).
Global Long Term Trend: Decline of >90%
Trusted
Threats
Threats
Populations of black-footed ferrets declined throughout this century to near extinction by the late 1970's (Biggins and Schroeder 1988). A small remnant population (around 100 animals or less; Schreiber et al. 1989) was discovered in 1981 near Meeteetse, in northwestern Wyoming, but that population was decimated by canine distemper and plague (Yersinia pestis) in 1985 (Forrest et al. 1988).
Another major threat for this mustelid is loss of habitat for conversion of grasslands to agricultural uses; the remaining habitat is now fragmented by great expanses of cropland and human development. In addition, the genetic diversity of the present introduced population is less than 90% of that present in the species prior to their decline in the wild. This decrease in genetic diversity has lead to increased inbreeding and may lead to decreased fitness due to inbreeding depression, including immune system dysfunction and reduced reproductive success (Bronson et al. 2007).
Trusted
Degree of Threat: A : Very threatened throughout its range communities directly exploited or their composition and structure irreversibly threatened by man-made forces, including exotic species
Comments: The species was extirpated from most of the former large range mainly as a result of prairie dog and predator control programs. Canine distemper, in conjunction with captures for captive breeding, resulted in extirpation of the last known wild population by early 1987. See Forrest et al. (1988) and Thorne and Williams (1988) for information on the distemper-caused decline that occurred in 1985.
Black-footed ferrets are highly susceptible to sylvatic plague. In nature, they could be exposed either by fleabite or consumption of infected prey. This disease has severely hampered efforts to restore ferrets to their historical range. Experimental results indicate that black-footed ferrets can be immunized against plague (Rocke et al. 2004). However, control of plague in black-footed ferrets and the ultimate recovery of the species will require control of the disease in their primary prey (prairie dogs) (Rocke et al. 2004).
Predation by coyote and badger and dispersal have been the primary problems at the Shirley Basin site (1994, End. Sp. Tech. Bull. 19(1):10, 13).
Reading and Kellert (1993) found that ranchers within a proposed reintroduction site in Phillips County, Montana, were antagonistic toward the reintroduction program. As of 2005, there was an on-going conflict between ranchers wanting to control prairie dog populations on grazing lands (through poisoning and recreational shoorting) and those wishing to protect and expand ferret habitat (i.e., prairie dog populations).
Trusted
Threats
Trusted
Management
Conservation Actions
Trusted
Restoration Potential: Captive breeding has been highly successful.
Preserve Selection and Design Considerations: See Bevers et al. (1997) for information on spatial optimization of prairie dog colonies for ferret recovery.
Management Requirements: See Seal et al. (1989) for discussion of captive propagation and aspects of population biology relevant to reintroduction. See Federal Register, 18 August 1994, for reintroduction protocols for South Dakota and Montana.
See Oldemeyer et al. (1993) for information on the management of prairie dog complexes for the reintroduction of black-footed ferret. Owen et al. (2000) point out that Pleistocene M. NIGRIPES did not need prairie dogs to survive; many fossil sites are associated with abundant ground squirrel (Spermophilus) remains, with no evidence of prairie dogs.
Management Research Needs: See Miller et al. (in Oldemeyer et al. 1993) for a list of questions for management and research, related to ferret reintroduction, in priority order in each category of disease, habitat management, population dynamics, and public relations.
Trusted
Global Protection: Several (4-12) occurrences appropriately protected and managed
Needs: This species is in need of continued protection of all extant occurrences. Recovery remains dependent on captive breeding and reintroduction.
Trusted
Management
Role of the Smithsonian in the Black-footed Ferret Recovery Program
In 1980 the black-footed ferret, Mustela nigripes, was feared extinct when an isolated remnant population was discovered Meeteese, Wyoming. In 1985 through 1987 the last 18 known individuals were captured and transported to a Wyoming Fish and Game facility for captive breeding. Only seven individuals successfully bred, from whom all living members of the species have descended. In 1988 the Smithsonian’s National Zoological Park became the first zoo to participate in the program when seven of the founders’ direct descendants were transferred to the Conservation Research Center in Front Royal, Virginia. In the mid-1980’s NZP researchers developed artificial insemination techniques on domestic ferrets and the Siberian polecat for use on black-footed ferrets. Techniques developed include evaluation of male testes and sperm, electroejaculation, cryopreservation of sperm and artificial insemination. From 1989 to 2009 566 ferrets were born at the CRC, 143 by artificial insemination. AI helped to insure against loss of the genetic diversity present in the founders. Positive results demonstrate that reproductive techniques are valuable for generating new knowledge of relevance to natural and assisted breeding and producing genetically valuable offspring useful for breeding stock and/or reintroduction (Hoard et al, 2002).
Trusted
Conservation
Trusted
Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems
Benefits
Economic Importance for Humans: Negative
Black-footed ferrets are often seen as pests by ranchers. The tunnel systems that are used by ferrets and prairie dogs cause holes in the the earth in the grazing lands of cattle. Unfortunate livestock sometimes step into these holes and become lame, after which they must be destroyed.
Trusted
Economic Importance for Humans: Positive
Black-footed ferrets help control populations of prairie dogs, which are sometimes seen as pests because of their burrowing activities and because they as as reservoirs for zoonotic diseases such as bubonic plaque.
Trusted
Wikipedia
Black-footed ferret
The black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes), also known as the American polecat[2] or prairie dog hunter,[3] is a species of Mustelid native to central North America. It is listed as endangered by the IUCN, because of its very small and restricted populations. First discovered by Audubon and Bachman in 1851, the species declined throughout the 20th century, primarily as a result of decreases in prairie dog populations and sylvatic plague. It was declared extinct in 1979 until Lucille Hogg's dog brought a dead black-footed ferret to her door in Meeteetse, Wyoming in 1981. That remnant population of a few dozen ferrets lasted there until the animals were considered extinct in the wild in 1987. However, a captive breeding program launched by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service resulted in its reintroduction into eight western states and Mexico from 1991–2008. There are now over 1,000 mature, wild-born individuals in the wild in 18 states of the USA, with four self-sustaining populations in South Dakota (two), Arizona and Wyoming.[1][4]
The black-footed ferret is roughly the size of a mink, and differs from the European polecat by the greater contrast between its dark limbs and pale body and the shorter length of its black tail-tip. In contrast, differences between the black-footed ferret and the steppe polecat of Asia are slight, to the point where the two species were once thought to be conspecific.[5] The only noticeable differences between the black-footed ferret and the steppe polecat are the former's much shorter and coarser fur, larger ears, and longer postmolar extension of the palate.[6]
It is largely nocturnal and solitary, except when breeding or raising litters.[7][8] Up to 91% of its diet is composed of prairie dogs.[9][10]
Contents |
Evolution
Like its close cousin, the Asian steppe polecat (with which it was once thought to be conspecific), the black-footed ferret represents a more progressive form than the European polecat in the direction of carnivory.[2] The black-footed ferret's most likely ancestor was Mustela stromeri (from which the European and steppe polecat are also derived), which originated in Europe during the Middle Pleistocene.[11] Molecular evidence indicates that the steppe polecat and black-footed ferret diverged from Mustela stromeri sometime between 500,000 and 2,000,000 years ago, perhaps in Beringia. The species appeared in the Great Basin and the Rockies by 750,000 years ago. The oldest recorded fossil find originates from Cathedral Cave, White Pine County, Nevada, and dates back to 750,000–850,000 years ago.[12] Prairie dog fossils have been found in six sites where ferrets are yielded, thus indicating that the association between the two species is an old one.[5] Anecdotal observations and 42% of examined fossil records indicated that any substantial colony of medium- to large-sized colonial ground squirrels, such as Richardson's ground squirrels, may provide a sufficient prey base and a source of burrows for black-footed ferrets. This suggests that the black-footed ferret and prairie dogs did not historically have an obligate predator-prey relationship.[12] The species has likely always been rare, and the modern black-footed ferret represents a relic population. The earliest reported occurrence of the species is from a late Illinoian deposit in Clay County, Nebraska, and is further recorded from Sangamonian deposits in Nebraska and Medicine Hat. Fossils have also been found in Alaska dating from the Pleistocene.[5][11]
Physical description
The black-footed ferret has a very long body and a blunt head. The forehead is arched and broad, and the muzzle is short. It has few whiskers, and its ears are triangular, short, erect and broad at the base. The neck is long and the legs short and stout. The toes are armed with sharp, very slightly arched claws. The feet on both surfaces are covered in hair, even to the soles, thus concealing the claws.[13] It combines several physical features common in both members of the subgenus Gale (least, short-tailed and long-tailed weasels) and Putorius (European and steppe polecats). Its skull resembles that of polecats in its size, massiveness and the development of its ridges and depressions, though it is distinguished by the extreme degree of constriction behind the orbits where the width of the cranium is much less than that of the muzzle. Though similar in size to polecats, its attenuate body, long neck, very short legs, slim tail, large orbicular ears and close-set pelage is much closer in conformation to weasels and stoats.[14] The dentition of the black-footed ferret closely resembles that of the European and steppe polecat, though the back lower molar is vestigial, with a hemispherical crown which is too small and weak to develop the little cusps which are more apparent in polecats.[14]
Males measure 500–533 millimetres (20–21.0 in) in body length and 114–127 millimetres (4.5–5.0 in) in tail length, thus constituting 22–25% of its body length. Females are typically 10% smaller than males.[5] It weighs 650–1,400 grams (1.4–3.1 lb).[15] Captive-bred ferrets used for the reintroduction projects were found to be smaller than their wild counterparts, though these animals rapidly attained historical body sizes once released.[16]
The base color is pale yellowish or buffy above and below. The top of the head and sometimes the neck is clouded by dark-tipped hairs. The face is crossed by a broad band of sooty black, which includes the eyes. The feet, lower parts of the legs, the tip of the tail and the preputial region are sooty-black. The area midway between the front and back legs is marked by a large patch of dark umber-brown, which fades into the buffy surrounding parts. A small spot occurs over each eye, with a narrow band behind the black mask. The sides of the head and the ears are dirty-white in color.[6]
Behavior and ecology
Territorial behavior
The black-footed ferret is solitary, except when breeding or raising litters.[7][8] It is nocturnal[7][17] and primarily hunts for sleeping prairie dogs in their burrows.[18] It is most active above ground from dusk to midnight and 4 a.m. to mid-morning.[10] Aboveground activity is greatest during late summer and early autumn when juveniles become independent.[10] Climate generally does not limit black-footed ferret activity,[8][10] but it may remain inactive inside burrows for up to 6 days at a time during winter.[19]
Female black-footed ferrets have smaller home ranges than males. Home ranges of males may sometimes include the home ranges of several females.[8] Adult females usually occupy the same territory every year. A female that was tracked from December to March occupied 39.5 acres (16 ha). Her territory was overlapped by a resident male that occupied 337.5 acres (137 ha) during the same period. The average density of black-footed ferrets near Meeteetse, Wyoming, is estimated at 1 black-footed ferret /99 to 148 acres (60 ha). As of 1985, 40 to 60 black-footed ferrets occupied a total of 6,178 to 7,413 acres (2,500 to 3,000 ha) of white-tailed prairie dog habitat.[7] From 1982 to 1984, the average year-round movement of 15 black-footed ferrets between white-tailed prairie dog colonies was 1.6 miles/night (2.5 km) (with a spread of 1.1 miles or 1.7 km). Movement of black-footed ferrets between prairie dog colonies is influenced by factors including breeding activity, season, sex, intraspecific territoriality, prey density, and expansion of home ranges with declining population density.[8][20] Movements of black-footed ferrets have been shown to increase during the breeding season; however, snow-tracking from December to March over a 4-year period near Meeteetse, Wyoming revealed that factors other than breeding were responsible for movement distances.[8]
Temperature is positively correlated with distance of black-footed ferret movement.[8] Snow-tracking from December to March over a 4-year period near Meeteetse, Wyoming, revealed that movement distances were shortest during winter and longest between February and April, when black-footed ferrets were breeding and white-tailed prairie dogs emerged from hibernation. Nightly movement distance of 170 black-footed ferrets averaged 0.87 miles (1.40 km) (range 0.001 to 6.91 miles (0.002–11.12 km)). Nightly activity areas of black-footed ferrets ranged from 1 to 337.5 acres (0 to 137 ha)), and were larger from February to March (110.2 acres (45 ha)) than from December to January (33.6 acres (14 ha)).[8] Adult females establish activity areas based on access to food for rearing young. Males establish activity areas to maximize access to females, resulting in larger activity areas than those of females.[8]
Prey density may account for movement distances. Black-footed ferrets may travel up to 11 miles (18 km) to seek prey, suggesting that they will interchange freely among white-tailed prairie dog colonies that are less than 11 miles (18 km) apart. In areas of high prey density, black-footed ferret movements were nonlinear in character, probably to avoid predators.[8] From December to March over a 4-year study period, black-footed ferrets investigated 68 white-tailed prairie dog holes per 1 mile (1.6 km) of travel/night. Distance traveled between white-tailed prairie dog burrows from December to March averaged 74.2 feet (22.6 m) over 149 track routes.[8]
Reproduction and development
The reproductive physiology of the black-footed ferret is similar to that of the European polecat and the steppe polecat. It is probably polygynous, based on data collected from home range sizes, skewed sex ratios, and sexual dimorphism.[8][20] Mating occurs in February and March.[8][19] When a male and female in estrus encounter each other, the male sniffs the genital region of the female, but does not mount her until after a few hours have elapsed, which is contrast to the more violent behavior displayed by the male European polecat. During copulation, the male grasps the female by the nape of the neck, with the copulatory tie lasting from 1.5–3 hours.[5] Unlike other mustelids, the black-footed ferret is a habitat specialist with low reproductive rates.[20] In captivity, gestation of black-footed ferrets lasts 42–45 days. Litter size ranges from 1–5 kits.[17] Kits are born in May and June[21] in prairie dog burrows.[7] Kits are altricial and are raised by their mother for several months after birth. Kits first emerge above ground in July, at 6 weeks old.[10][20][21] They are then separated into individual prairie dog burrows around their mother's burrow.[10] Kits reach adult weight and become independent several months following birth, from late August to October.[10][20] Sexual maturity occurs at one year of age.[10]
Intercolony dispersal of juvenile black-footed ferrets occurs several months after birth, from early September to early November. Dispersal distances may be short or long. Near Meeteetse, Wyoming, 9 juvenile males and 3 juvenile females dispersed 1 to 4 miles (1–7 km) following litter breakup. Four juvenile females dispersed a short distance (<0.2 miles (0.3 km)) but remained on their natal area.[20]
Diet
Up to 91% of the black-footed ferret's diet is composed of prairie dogs.[9][10] The diet of the black-footed ferret varies depending on geographic location. In western Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and Montana, black-footed ferrets historically associated with white-tailed prairie dogs and were forced to find alternate prey when white-tailed prairie dogs entered their four month hibernation cycle.[17] In Wyoming, alternate prey items consumed during white-tailed prairie dog hibernation included voles (Microtus spp.) and mice (Peromyscus spp. and Mus spp.) found near streams. In South Dakota, black-footed ferrets associate with black-tailed prairie dogs. Because black-tailed prairie dogs do not hibernate, little seasonal change in black-footed ferret diet is necessary.[8][17]
In Mellette County, South Dakota, black-tailed prairie dog remains occurred in 91% of 82 black-footed ferret scats. Mouse remains occurred in 26% of scats. Mouse remains could not be identified to species; however, deer mice, northern grasshopper mice, and house mice were captured in snap-trap surveys. Potential prey items included thirteen-lined ground squirrels, plains pocket gophers, mountain cottontails, upland sandpipers, horned larks, and western meadowlarks.[10]
Based on 86 black-footed ferret scats found near Meeteetse, Wyoming, 87% of black-footed ferret diet was composed of white-tailed prairie dogs. Other food items included deer mice, sagebrush voles, meadow voles, mountain cottontails, and white-tailed jackrabbits. Water is obtained through consumption of prey.[7]
One adult female black-footed ferret and her litter require approximately 474 to 1,421 black-tailed prairie dogs per year or 412 to 1,236 white-tailed prairie dogs per year for sustenance. These figures assume that each adult black-footed ferret occupies 1 prairie dog colony, each young black-footed ferret will disperse to a new colony when mature, and prairie dogs are the only prey species available. This dietary requirement would require protection of 91 to 235 acres (37–95 ha) of black-tailed prairie dog habitat or 413 to 877 acres (167–355 ha) of white-tailed prairie dog habitat for each female black-footed ferret with a litter.[22]
Distribution and habitat
The historical range of the black-footed ferret was closely correlated with, but not restricted to, the range of prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.). Its range extended from southern Alberta and southern Saskatchewan south to Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona.[5] As of 2007, the only known wild black-footed ferret population was located on approximately 6,000 acres (2,428 ha) in the western Big Horn Basin near Meeteetse, Wyoming.[7][8][9][19][20] Other populations might exist but remain undetected.[5] Since 1990, black-footed ferrets have been reintroduced to the following sites: Shirley Basin, Wyoming; UL Bend National Wildlife Refuge and Fort Belknap Indian Reservation, Montana; Conata Basin/Badlands, Buffalo Gap National Grassland, and the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation in South Dakota; Aubrey Valley, Arizona; Wolf Creek, Colorado; Coyote Basin, straddling Colorado and Utah; and northern Chihuahua, Mexico.[21]
Historical habitats of the black-footed ferret included shortgrass prairie, mixed-grass prairie, desert grassland, shrub steppe, sagebrush steppe,[20] mountain grassland, and semi-arid grassland.[5] Black-footed ferrets use prairie dog burrows for raising young, avoiding predators, and thermal cover.[7][10] Six black-footed ferret nests found near Mellette County, South Dakota, were lined with buffalo grass, prairie threeawn, sixweeks grass, and cheatgrass. High densities of prairie dog burrows provide the greatest amount of cover for black-footed ferrets.[7][8] Black-tailed prairie dog colonies contain a greater burrow density per acre than white-tailed prairie dog colonies, and may be more suitable for the recovery of black-footed ferrets.[7] The type of prairie dog burrow may be important for occupancy by black-footed ferrets. Black-footed ferret litters near Meeteetse, Wyoming, were associated with mounded white-tailed prairie dog burrows, which are less common than non-mounded burrows. Mounded burrows contain multiple entrances and probably have a deep and extensive burrow system that protects kits.[7] However, black-footed ferrets used non-mounded prairie dog burrows (64%) more often than mounded burrows (30%) near Meeteetse, Wyoming.[8]
Mortality
Primary causes of mortality include habitat loss, human-introduced diseases, and indirect poisoning from prairie dog control.[10][17][19][21] Annual mortality of juvenile and adult black-footed ferrets over a 4-year period ranged from 59% to 83% (128 individuals) near Meeteetse, Wyoming.[20] During fall and winter, 50% to 70% of juveniles and older animals perish.[20] Average lifespan in the wild is probably only 1 year but may be up to 5 years. Males have higher rates of mortality than females because of longer dispersal distances when they are most vulnerable to predators.[20]
Given an obligate-dependence of black-footed ferrets on prairie dogs, black-footed ferrets are extremely vulnerable to prairie dog habitat loss. Habitat loss results from agriculture, livestock use, and other development.[21]
Black-footed ferrets are susceptible to numerous diseases. They are fatally susceptible to canine distemper (Morbillivirus),[5][20] introduced by striped skunks, common raccoons, red foxes, coyotes, and American badgers.[19] A short-term vaccine for canine distemper is available for captive black-footed ferrets, but no protection is available for young born in the wild. Other diseases that black-footed ferrets are susceptible to include rabies, tularemia, and human influenza. Sylvatic plague (Yersinia pestis) probably does not directly affect black-footed ferrets, but epidemics in prairie dog towns may completely destroy the black-footed ferrets' prey base.[20]
Predators of black-footed ferrets include golden eagles, great horned owls, coyotes, American badgers, bobcats, prairie falcons, ferruginous hawks, and prairie rattlesnakes.[10][19][20]
Oil and natural gas exploration and extraction can have detrimental impacts on prairie dogs and black-footed ferrets. Seismic activity collapses prairie dog burrows. Other problems include potential leakages and spills, increased roads and fences, increased vehicle traffic and human presence, and an increased number of raptor perching sites on power poles. Traps set for coyotes, American mink, and other animals may harm black-footed ferrets.[9]
History
Native American tribes, including the Crow, Blackfoot, Sioux, Cheyenne, and Pawnee, used black-footed ferrets for religious rites and for food.[17] The species was not encountered during the Lewis and Clark Expedition, nor was it seen by Nuttall or Townsend, and it was not until it was first described in Audubon and Bachman's Viviparous Quadrupeds of North America in 1851 that it became known to the scientific world.[23]
It is with great pleasure that we introduce this handsome new species ; ... [it] inhabits the wooded parts of the country to the Rocky Mountains, and perhaps is found beyond that range... When we consider the very rapid manner in which every expedition that has crossed the Rocky Mountains, has been pushed forward, we cannot wonder that many species have been entirely overlooked... The habits of this species resemble, as far as we have learned, those of [the European polecat]. It feeds on birds, small reptiles and animals, eggs, and various insects, and is a bold and cunning foe to the rabbits, hares, grouse, and other game of our western regions.—Audubon and Bachman (1851)[23]
Decline
For a time, the black-footed ferret was harvested for the fur trade, with the American Fur Company having received 86 ferret skins from Pratt, Chouteau, and Company of St. Louis in the late 1830s. During the early years of predator control, black-footed ferret carcasses were likely discarded, as their fur was of low value. This likely continued after the passing of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, for fear of reprisals. The large drop in black-footed ferret numbers began during the 1800s through to the 1900s, as prairie dog numbers declined because of control programs and the conversion of prairies to croplands. Sylvatic plague, a disease introduced into North America, also contributed to the prairie dog die-off, though ferret numbers declined proportionately more than their prey, thus indicating other factors may have been responsible. Disease and inbreeding depression may have also contributed, as studies on black-footed ferrets from Meeteetse revealed low levels of genetic variation. Canine distemper devastated the Meeteetse population in 1985. A live virus vaccine originally made for domestic ferrets killed large numbers of black-footed ferrets, thus indicating that the species is especially susceptible to distemper.[15]
Reintroduction and conservation
US federal and state agencies in cooperation with private landowners, conservation groups, Native Americans, and North American zoos, have been actively reintroducing ferrets back into the wild since 1991. Beginning in Wyoming, reintroduction efforts have since expanded to sites in Montana, South Dakota, Arizona, Utah, Colorado, and Chihuahua, Mexico. The Toronto Zoo has bred hundreds, most of which were released into the wild.[24] Several episodes of Zoo Diaries show aspects of the tightly controlled breeding. Proposed reintroduction sites have been identified in Canada. However, in May 2000, the Canadian Species at Risk Act listed the black-footed ferret as being an extirpated species in Canada.[25] A population of 34 animals was released into Grasslands National Park in southern Saskatchewan on October 2, 2009,[26] and a litter of newborn kits was observed in July 2010.[27]
As of 2007, the total wild population of black-footed ferrets was well over 650 individuals (plus 250 in captivity) in the US. In 2008, the IUCN classified the species as globally endangered, a substantial improvement since the 1996-assessment when it was considered extinct in the wild, since at that time the species was indeed only surviving in captivity. The black-footed ferret is listed as "Endangered" under the Endangered Species Act since September 20, 2005. An April 2006 report in The New York Times puts South Dakota's Conata Basin population at around 250. Arizona's Aubrey Valley population is well over 100 and they have started a second reintroduction site using around 50 animals. An August 2007 report by Wyoming researchers in the journal Science counted a population of 223 in one area of the state (the original number of reintroduced ferrets, most of which died, was 228), and an annual growth rate of 35% from 2003–2006 was estimated.[28][29] This rate of recovery is much faster than for many endangered species, and the ferret seems to have prevailed over the previous problems of disease and prey shortage that hampered its improvement.[29]
See also
References
Notes
This article incorporates public domain material from the United States Department of Agriculture document "Mustela nigripes".
- ^ a b Belant, J., Gober, P. & Biggins, D. (2008). Mustela nigripes. In: IUCN 2008. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 21 March 2009. Database entry includes a brief justification of why this species is of endangered.
- ^ a b Heptner, V. G. (Vladimir Georgievich); Nasimovich, A. A; Bannikov, Andrei Grigorevich; Hoffmann, Robert S. Mammals of the Soviet Union Volume: v. 2, pt. 1b (2001) Washington, D.C. : Smithsonian Institution Libraries and National Science Foundation
- ^ Coues 1877, p. 151
- ^ Russell McLendon (2011-09-30). "Rare U.S. ferret marks 30-year comeback". Mother Nature Network. http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/animals/blogs/rare-us-ferret-marks-30-year-comeback. Retrieved 2011-10-09.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Hillman, Conrad N.; Clark, Tim W (1980). "Mustela nigripes". Mammalian Species 126: 1–3.
- ^ a b Merriam 1896, p. 8
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Houston, B. R.; Clark, Tim W.; Minta, S. C (1986). "Habitat suitability index model for the black-footed ferret: a method to locate transplant sites". Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 8: 99–114. https://ojs.lib.byu.edu/ojs/index.php/gbnmem/article/viewArticle/3029.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Richardson, Louise; Clark, Tim W.; Forrest, Steven C.; Campbell, Thomas M (1987). "Winter ecology of black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes) at Meeteetse, Wyoming". The American Midland Naturalist 117 (2): 225–239. doi:10.2307/2425964. JSTOR 2425964.
- ^ a b c d Clark, Tim W (1986). "Some guidelines for management of the black-footed ferret". Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 8: 160–168.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Hillman, Conrad N. 1968. Life history and ecology of the black-footed ferret in the wild. Brookings, SD: South Dakota State University. Thesis
- ^ a b Kurtén 1980, pp. 152–153
- ^ a b Fossils, diet, and conservation of black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes). doi:10.1043/0022-2372(2000)081(0422:FDACOB)2.0.CO;2. http://a-s.clayton.edu/furlong/BIOL4500/papers/ososkay.pdf.
- ^ Audubon & Bachman 1851, p. 297
- ^ a b Coues 1877, pp. 147–148
- ^ a b Biggins, Dean E. and Max H. Schroeder. 1988. Historical and present status of the black-footed ferret. Pp. 9397 in_ Eighth Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop, USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rpt. RM-154, Rapid City, South Dakota
- ^ Wisely, Samantha M.; Santymire, Rachel M.; Livieri, Travis M.; Marinari, Paul E.; Kreeger, Julie S.; Wildt, David E.; Howard, Jogayle (2005). "Environment influences morphology and development for in situ and ex situ populations of the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes)". Animal Conservation 8 (3): 321–328. doi:10.1017/S1367943005002283. http://www.prairiewildlife.org/cssandsupportfiles/Morphology.pdf.
- ^ a b c d e f Clark, Tim W (1976). "The black-footed ferret". Oryx 13 (3): 275–280. doi:10.1017/S0030605300013727.
- ^ "Black-Footed Ferret (Mustela nigripes)". National Parks Conservation Association. http://www.npca.org/wildlife_protection/wildlife_facts/ferret.html. Retrieved 2010-06-14.
- ^ a b c d e f Clark, Tim W (1987). "Restoring balance between the endangered black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) and human use of the Great Plains and Intermountain West". Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 77 (4): 168–173.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Forrest, Steven C.; Biggins, Dean E.; Richardson, Louise; Clark, Tim W.; Campbell, Thomas M., III; Fagerstone, Kathleen A.; Thorne, E (1988). "Population attributes for the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) at Meeteetse, Wyoming, 1981–1985". Journal of Mammalogy 69 (2): 261–273. doi:10.2307/1381377. JSTOR 1381377.
- ^ a b c d e U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1988. Species account: Black-footed ferret—Mustela nigripes, In: Endangered Species Program. Pierre, SD: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region, South Dakota Ecological Services Field Office
- ^ Stromberg, Mark R.; Rayburn, R. Lee; Clark, Tim W (1983). "Black-footed ferret prey requirements: an energy balance estimate". Journal of Wildlife Management 47 (1): 67–73. doi:10.2307/3808053. JSTOR 3808053.
- ^ a b Audubon & Bachman 1851, pp. 298–299
- ^ "Toronto Zoo > Conservation > Mammals". http://www.torontozoo.com/conservation/mammals.asp. Retrieved 2009-09-22.
- ^ "Species at Risk – Black-footed Ferret". Environment Canada. 2006-05-08. http://www.speciesatrisk.gc.ca/search/speciesDetails_e.cfm?SpeciesID=138. Retrieved 2007-08-16.
- ^ "Black-footed ferret back on prairie turf". CBC News. October 2, 2009. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewan/story/2009/10/02/sk-black-footed-ferret-grasslands-released.html. Retrieved 2009-10-02.
- ^ "Black-footed ferrets breeding in Sask.". CBC News. August 4, 2010. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewan/story/2010/08/04/sk-black-footed-ferret-kits-1084.html. Retrieved 2010-08-05.
- ^ Fox, Maggie (August 9, 2007). "Once rare black-footed ferrets make comeback". Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSN0922622320070809?feedType=RSS&feedName=scienceNews. Retrieved 2009-10-02.
- ^ a b Fountain, Henry (August 14, 2007). "Call It a Comeback: Ferret Population Shows Big Growth in Wyoming". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14obs3.html?ex=1344744000&en=e7cc2c7b70433218&ei=5088. Retrieved 2009-10-02.
Bibliography
- Audubon, John James; Bachman, John (1851). The quadrupeds of North America, Vol. 2. New York, V.G. Audubon. http://www.archive.org/details/quadrupedsofnort02audu
- Coues, Elliott (1877). Fur-bearing Animals: A Monograph of North American Mustelidae. Government Printing Office. http://www.archive.org/details/furbearinganima00couegoog
- Feldhamer, George A.; Thompson, Bruce Carlyle; Chapman, Joseph A. (2003). Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation. JHU Press. ISBN 0-8018-7416-5
- Kurtén, Björn (1980). Pleistocene mammals of North America. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-03733-3
- Merriam, Clinton Hart (1896). Synopsis of the weasels of North America. Washington : Govt. Print. Off.. http://www.archive.org/details/synopsisofweasel00merriala
Unreviewed
Names and Taxonomy
Taxonomy
Comments: Some have suggested that M. nigripes may be conspecific with Old World M. eversmanii (see Wozencraft, in Wilson and Reeder 2005). However, the two have been been accepted as distinct species by all major North American sources for many years.
Trusted
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!




