Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (3) (learn more)
Overview
Brief Summary
Description
Links:
Mammal Species of the World
Click here for The American Society of Mammalogists species account
- Original description: Rafinesque, C.S., 1817. Descriptions of seven new genera of North American quadrupeds, p. 45. American Monthly Magazine and Critical Review, 2(1):44-46.
Trusted
Distribution
Range Description
The subspecies goffi occurred on the Pineda Ridge, along the Indian River, in the vicinity of Eau Gallie (now incorporated into Melbourne), Brevard County, Florida. Historically it was known from 3.2 km north and south of Eau Gallie and as far as 3.2 km inland from the Indian River (Layne 1978, Sherman 1944).
Trusted
Geographic Range
The range of G. pinetis extends from southern Georgia and southeastern Alabama to northern and central Florida. Geomys pinetis consists of five subspecies which together form this range. Geomys pinetis austrinus resides in central Florida, G. p. floridanus is in northern Florida and southern Georgia, G. p. goffi was in eastern central Florida, G. p. mobilensis is found in southeastern Alabama and northwestern Florida, and G. p. pinetis is mostly found in southern Georgia. (Pembleton et al. 1978)
Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native )
Trusted
National Distribution
United States
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
Trusted
Global Range: Northern and central Florida, southern Georgia, and southern Alabama (Pembleton and Williams 1978).
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Physical Description
This pocket gopher is a medium-sized rodent with a total length of about 290 mm in males and 261 mm in females. This sexual dimorphic species has a size difference of roughly 10%. The cylindrical body has sepia fur, shaded orange-cinnamon on the sides of the shoulders and flanks, with white hairs on the throat and forearms, a white patch from the forehead to the nostrils, and grayish underparts. All pocket gophers' fossorial adaptations include small eyes, reduced pinnae, strong-clawed forelimbs, nearly naked tail, external fur-lined cheek pouches, and a thick body. The teeth are all evergrowing and the cheekteeth have reduced enamel. The large exposed incisors function as picks while burrowing. The dental formula is i 1/1, c 0/0, p 1/1, m 3/3, total 20.
A major distinguishing characteristic of this species is the hourglass-shaped nasals which are constricted near the middle. Geomys pinetis can be further distinguished from some other Geomys as follows: from G. fontanelus by the missing fontanel between the parietal and squamosal bones on the skull; from G. cumberlandius by a greater angled zygomatic arch which is not extended posteriorly; and from G. colonus by a broad V-shaped, rather than U-shaped interpterygoid space. (Pembleton et al. 1978, Lee 1980, Ross 1980)
Trusted
Size
Size in North America
Length:
Average: 260 mm
Range: 215-324 mm
Weight:
Range: 135-208 g
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Habitat and Ecology
Breeding occurs year-round, with peak mating activity from January to August. Litter size is an average of two young per female. Up to two litters per year. Except during breeding season, only one individual occupies a burrow system. Pocket gophers are ecologically important as prey items and in influencing soils, microtopography, habitat heterogeneity, diversity of plant species, and primary productivity (Huntly and Inouye 1988). The diet is primarily roots, fleshy rhizomes, green succulents, and grasses. Peak activity probably occurs from dusk to dawn. They are active year-round.
Systems
- Terrestrial
Trusted
Habitat
This pocket gopher generally resides in either the sandhill ecosystem or the xeric hammock ecosystem. Longleaf pines (Pinus palustris) and turkey oaks (Quercus laevis) are the two dominant trees within the sandhill ecosystem. The terrain is rolling and the soil is well-drained. The xeric hammock ecosystem is dominated by live oaks (Q. virginiana) and other hardwood species. The soil contains more organic material and is slightly moister than that of the sandhill ecosystem. In areas where sandhill and xeric hammock habitats are disappearing from modern land-use practices, pocket gophers are adapting by burrowing into road shoulders, power line rights of way, railroad embankments, fields along airport runways, parks, lawns, orchards, cemetaries, baseball fields, and golf courses. (Wilkins 1986, Lee 1980)
Terrestrial Biomes: savanna or grassland ; forest
Trusted
Comments: Prefers the deep sandy soils of open areas. Absent from the silt loam soils of the Rio Grande Floodplain. Open areas of long-leaf pine woods, dry loose soils. Fossorial.
Trusted
Migration
Non-Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species do not make significant seasonal migrations. Juvenile dispersal is not considered a migration.
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.
Trusted
Trophic Strategy
Food Habits
The bulk of this pocket gopher's diet includes roots and other herbaceous material. While burrowing, these pocket gophers collect plant roots, tubers, bulbs, and stems, which they transport in their cheek pouches to underground storage chambers for later consumption. It occasionally emerges above ground and feeds on grasses, forbs, and sedges (Humphrey 1992, Wilkins 1986)
Trusted
Comments: Eats roots, fleshy rhizomes, green succulents, and grasses.
Trusted
General Ecology
Except during breeding season, only 1 individual occupies a burrow system (Maritime pocket gopher). Pocket gophers are ecologically important as prey items and in influencing soils, microtopography, habitat heterogeneity, diversity of plant species, and primary productivity (Huntly and Inouye 1988).
Trusted
Life History and Behavior
Cyclicity
Comments: Peak activity probably occurs from dusk to dawn. Active year-round.
Trusted
Reproduction
Reproduction
This pocket gopher breeds throughout the year. Females exhibit two major peaks of activity during February through March and June through August, whereas males display a more constant higher level of activity from January through August. Males have alternating cycles of spermatogenic activity and inactivity, and they produce sperm at a higher rate with increased age. The range of litter sizes is one to three with averages of 1.7 0.51 and 1.52 0.11 in separate studies. Females may produce two litters per year corresponding with their two peaks of sexual activity. Pocket gophers are born tail-end first and average 50 mm and 5.8 g. The eyes, ears, and cheek pouches are closed at birth. Young pocket gophers are usually weaned and dispersed by one month, and reach sexual maturity by the age of four to six months. (Pembleton et al. 1978)
Trusted
Breeds year-round, with peak mating activity January-August. Litter size is 1-3 (average 2). Up to two litters per year.
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
IUCN Red List Assessment
Red List Category
Red List Criteria
Version
Year Assessed
Assessor/s
Reviewer/s
Justification
History
- 1996Lower Risk/least concern
Trusted
Conservation Status
Four of the five subspecies of G. pinetis are common throughout their range. G. p. goffi was listed as endangered by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission in 1990. It is now considered to be extinct and is therefore no longer being considered for listing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (Humphrey 1992)
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: least concern
Trusted
Status
Trusted
National NatureServe Conservation Status
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure
Trusted
Trends
Population
Population Trend
Trusted
Threats
Threats
Conversion of the only known site of occurrence of subspecies goffi to human use apparently led to its extinction.
Trusted
Management
Conservation Actions
Sherman's pocket gopher (G. p. fontanelus ) is considered to be Endangered and possibly extinct by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (Hafneret al., 1998). Goff's pocket gopher (G. p. goffi) in Florida is presumed extinct.
Trusted
Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems
Benefits
Economic Importance for Humans: Negative
Over 203 articles were published between 1888 and 1976 regarding the damage caused by pocket gophers. Suggestions to control these pests included traps, poisons, anticoagulants, repellents, gas-chambers, and mechanical burrow-diggers. Most pocket gophers are quickly exterminated from lawns, golf courses, parks, and cemeteries. (Avise et al. 1982)
Trusted
Economic Importance for Humans: Positive
Pocket gophers play several important roles in the functioning of their ecosystems. They return leached nutrients to the surface of the soil, pushing up to 81,600 kg/ha of burrow soil to the surface per year. The soil mounds create numerous small sites for colonization and secondary succession within grasslands, sandhills, and scrub. (Humphrey 1992)
Trusted
Wikipedia
Southeastern Pocket Gopher
The Southeastern Pocket Gopher, Geomys pinetis, is a species of pocket gopher that is native to the Southeastern United States. It occurs in Alabama, Georgia, and Florida, where it is the only pocket gopher.
References
- ^ Linzey, A.V. & NatureServe (Hammerson, G.) (2008). Geomys pinetis. In: IUCN 2008. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 29 January 2009.
Further reading
- Ecological Engineers: Southeastern Pocket Gophers are one of Nature's Architects - University of Florida fact sheet
- J. L. Patton (2005). "Geomys pinetis". In Wilson, Don E.; Reeder, DeeAnn M.. Mammal Species of the World (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2 vols. (2142 pp.). pp. 859–870. ISBN 978-0-8018-8221-0. OCLC 62265494. http://www.bucknell.edu/msw3/browse.asp?id=12800083.
| This Geomyidae article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
Unreviewed
Names and Taxonomy
Taxonomy
Comments: Laerm (1981) and Hall (1981) regarded subspecies cumberlandius of Cumberland Island, Georgia, as a distinct species, but Baker et al. (2003) and Patton (in Wilson and Reeder 1993, 2005) did not. Baker et al. and Patton also did not follow Hall (1981) in treating colonus and fontanelus as species distinct from G. pinetis.
Trusted
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!




