Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (13) (learn more)

Overview

Brief Summary

Description

Only soils with low percentages of silt, clay, and gravel will do for the Texas Pocket Gopher, so many of its populations are isolated from one another. The species occurs in southern Texas and extreme northeastern Mexico, burrowing in deep, sandy soils and only infrequently emerging aboveground. It forages on plant root systems, and is capable of pulling some plants through the soil and into its burrow. While in the burrow, Texas Pocket Gophers keep any entrance to the surface plugged with soil; this closed-door policy not only helps to keep out unwanted guests, it also helps to maintain a suitable subterranean environment. Variation in size is one notable trait of the species, probably a result of population isolation.

Links:
Mammal Species of the World
Click here for The American Society of Mammalogists species account
  • Original description: True, F.W., 1889.  Description of Geomys personatus and Dipodomys compactus, two new species of rodents from Padre Island, Texas, p. 159.  Proceedings of theU.S. National Museum, 11:159-160.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution

Source: Smithsonian's North American Mammals

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution

Range Description

The Texas pocket gopher has a patchy distribution throughout south Texas and the adjacent north-eastern portion of Tamaulipas, Mexico (Williams 1982).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National Distribution

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Year-round

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: Southern Texas, including Padre and Mustang islands and north to Val Verde County, and barrier islands of extreme northeastern Tamaulipas, Mexico (Wilkins and Swearingen 1990; Schmidly 2004; Patton, in Wilson and Reeder 1993, 2005).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Size

Length: 33 cm

Weight: 397 grams

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Size in North America

Sexual Dimorphism: Males are larger than females.

Length:
Average: 270 mm
Range: 216-360 mm

Weight:
Range: 165-400 g
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution

Source: Smithsonian's North American Mammals

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
The Texas pocket gopher prefers loose, sandy soils in open or sparsely wooded areas, with dense soils acting as a barrier to dispersal. They are fossorial animals, spending most of their lives underground. These pocket gophers apparently live alone with each animal having its own burrow system, which includes up to 30 m of tunnels. Diet consists of underground vegetation (roots, bulbs, and rhizomes), occasionally eating surface vegetation within easy reach of the burrow entrance. Breeding occurs between October and February with females producing two litters of 3-4 young each year (Williams 1982).

Systems
  • Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Fossorial, in deep sandy soils; apparently restricted to fine sands, loamy fine sands, fine sandy loams, and sandy loams (Wilkins and Swearingen 1990). Not on silt loam. Fossorial; extensive burrow system.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Migration

Non-Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species do not make significant seasonal migrations. Juvenile dispersal is not considered a migration.

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Trophic Strategy

Comments: Feeds mostly from within burrow on roots and other plant parts, especially those of grasses (Whitaker 1980), but also herbaceous plants (Wilson and Ruff 1999).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

Pocket gophers are ecologically important as prey items and in influencing soils, microtopography, habitat heterogeneity, diversity of plant species, and primary productivity (Huntly and Inouye 1988).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Life Expectancy

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

Observations: In the wild, the estimated lifespan of these animals is 2 years (Williams 1982). Maximum lifespan is unknown.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Joao Pedro de Magalhaes

Source: AnAge

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2008

Assessor/s
Hafner, D.J., Timm, R. & Lacher, T.

Reviewer/s
McKnight, M. (Global Mammal Assessment Team) & Amori, G. (Small Nonvolant Mammal Red List Authority)

Justification
Listed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution (though patchily distributed), presumed large population, occurrence in protected areas, and because it is unlikely to be declining at nearly the rate required to qualify for listing in a threatened category. There are, however, at least three subspecies that are threatened by continued habitat loss within their restricted ranges.

History
  • 2000
    Lower Risk/near threatened
  • 1996
    Lower Risk/least concern
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National NatureServe Conservation Status

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N4 - Apparently Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G4 - Apparently Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Status

Two subspecies, the maritime pocket gopher (G. personatus maritimus) and the Carrizo Springs pocket gopher (G. personatus strecki) are Vulnerable; the parent species (G. personatus) and the Rio Grande pocket gopher subspecies (G. personatus fuscus) are both Near Threatened.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution

Source: Smithsonian's North American Mammals

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
This species is common to abundant throughout much of its range. It can also be uncommon in some parts of its range, and is patchily distributed due to its association with specific soil types.

Population Trend
Unknown
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Threats

Major Threats
At the species level, G. personatus appears secure. However, the small, restricted populations of three subspecies (maritimus, fuscus, streckeri) are vulnerable to the detrimental effects of habitat modification from agriculture.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
This species occurs is a few protected areas. Further taxonomic work is needed on the subspecies of G. personatus, specifically to determine whether any of the subspecies warrant full species status.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Texas Pocket Gopher

The Texas Pocket Gopher (Geomys personatus) is a species of rodent in the family Geomyidae. It is found in Tamaulipas in Mexico and in Texas in the United States.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b Hafner, D.J., Timm, R. & Lacher, T. (2008). Geomys personatus. In: IUCN 2008. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 29 January 2009. Database entry includes a brief justification of why this species is of least concern


Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: Morphological variation (cranial and dental) corresponds better with soils composition than with geographic location (Wilkins and Swearingen 1990).

In a phylogenetic study of Geomys mitochondrial RNA, Jolley et al. (2000) concluded that G. personatus streckeri should be recognized as a distinct species rather than as a subspecies of G. personatus. The North American mammal checklist by Baker et al. (2003) accepted G. streckeri as a distinct species. Patton (in Wilson and Reeder 2005) stated that streckeri may warrant specific status but included it as a subspecies of G. personatus.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!