Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (3) (learn more)

Overview

Brief Summary

Description

"Some 1.6 million gray myotis - almost the entire North American population - spend the winter together in the same nine caves, deep in hibernation. Some of them migrate long distances to reach these caves. Although 1.6 million sounds like a lot of bats, the total population has probably fallen by about 50 percent since 1965, and the species was listed as endangered in 1976. The bats depend on caves not only to hibernate, but also for summer maternity roosts. Hibernating bats can die if they are awakened when no food is available. Females need warm caves for maternity colonies, often choosing caves that have streams running through them, because the streams prevent some predators from entering the cave. The caves are always near a major river or lake, where they can forage for insects over water. Caves that are opened for tourism, vandalized, or flooded, are lost to the bats  and so are caves that are sealed up, unless bat-friendly gates are installed. Awareness of the bats' needs seems to be helping halt the decline of gray myotis and some other cave-dependent species."

Links:
Mammal Species of the World
Click here for The American Society of Mammalogists species account
  • Original description: Howell, A.H., 1909.  Description of a new bat from Nickajack Cave, Tennessee, p.46.  Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 22:45-47.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution

Source: Smithsonian's North American Mammals

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution

Range Description

The range extends from southeastern Kansas and central Oklahoma east to western Virginia and western North Carolina, and from Missouri, Illinois, and Indiana south to southern Alabama and northwestern Florida (Decher and Choate 1995); occurs primarily in the cave region of Missouri, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Alabama. Summer and winter ranges are essentially the same.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Geographic Range

Myotis grisescens is widely distributed in the southeastern United States of America. The distribution of gray bats within their range has always been patchy. Gray bats inhabit the cave regions of northern Arkansas, Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Alabama. There are also occasional colonies in northwestern Florida, western Georgia, southwestern Kansas, southern Indiana, southern and southwestern Illinois, northeastern Oklahoma, northeastern Mississippi, western Virginia, and possibly western North Carolina.

Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native )

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Endangered Species, 1991. "Gray Bat" (On-line). Accessed November 2, 2001 at http://endangered.fws.gov/i/a/saa4l.html.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

endemic to a single nation

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National Distribution

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Year-round

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: (200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)) The range extends from southeastern Kansas and central Oklahoma east to western Virginia and western North Carolina, and from Missouri, Illinois, and Indiana south to southern Alabama and northwestern Florida (Decher and Choate 1995); occurs primarily in the cave region of Missouri, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Alabama. Summer and winter ranges are essentially the same.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Historic Range:
Central and southeastern U.S.A.

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Morphology

Physical Description

M. grisecens is the largest member of its genus in the eastern United States. They weigh between 7 and 16 g and are 75 to 101 mm in length. Forearm length ranges between 40 and 46 mm. Gray bats can be distinguished from all other eastern bats by their uni-colored dorsal fur (all others have bi- or tri-colored dorsal fur). They are also the only species of Myotis in which the wing membrane connects to the foot at the ankle as opposed to connecting at the base of the first toe.

Gray bats are dark gray in color directly after they molt in July or August. Between molts, they bleach to a russet color. This difference in fur color is most apparent in females during the reproductive season (May or June).

Range mass: 7 to 16 g.

Range length: 75 to 101 mm.

Other Physical Features: endothermic ; heterothermic ; bilateral symmetry

Sexual Dimorphism: sexes alike

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Size

Length: 10 cm

Weight: 9 grams

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Size in North America

Length:
Range: 80-96 mm

Weight:
Range: 7-16 g
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution

Source: Smithsonian's North American Mammals

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Diagnostic Description

Most likely to be confused with M. lucifugus, M. sodalis, M. austroriparius, and M. septentrionalis. Distinguished from these by uniform-colored dorsal fur from base to tip (all others have contrasting shades, bi- or tri-colored dorsal fur) and by attachment of wing membrane at ankle, not at base of toe (Barbour and Davis 1969, Tuttle 1978).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Type Information

Type for Myotis grisescens Howell, 1909
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Mammals
Sex/Stage: Male; Adult
Preparation: Skin; Skull
Collector(s): A. Howell
Year Collected: 1908
Locality: Nickajack Cave, Near Shellmound, Marion County, Tennessee, United States, North America
  • Type: 1909 Mar 10. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington. 22: 46.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Mammals

Source: National Museum of Natural History Image Collection

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
About 95% of entire known population hibernates in eight or nine caves, over half in one cave. Roost sites are nearly exclusively restricted to caves throughout the year (Hall and Wilson 1966, Barbour and Davis 1969, Tuttle 1976), though only a few percent of available caves are suitable (Tuttle 1979). Winter roosts are in deep vertical caves with domed halls. Large summer colonies utilize caves that trap warm air and provide restricted rooms or domed ceilings; maternity caves often have a stream flowing through them and are separate from the caves used in summer by males. Occasionally non-cave roost sites are used. Hays and Bingman (1964) reported a colony in a storm sewer in Pittsburg, Kansas and, in 1988, a maternity colony was discovered using a storm sewer in Kansas (Decher and Choate 1988). Harvey and McDaniel (1988) located a maternity colony in a storm sewer in downtown Newark, Independence County, Arkansas. There are occasional reports of mines (Sealander 1979, Thom 1981, Brack et al. 1984, Harvey and McDaniel 1988) and buildings (Gunier and Elder 1971) being used as roost sites. Winter caves are deep and vertical and provide a large volume of air below the lowest entrance that acts as a cold air trap (Tuttle 1976). Cold air flows in and is trapped during successive winters, providing mean annual temperatures 6 degrees C or more below the above-ground mean annual temperature (Tuttle 1978). Winter cave temperatures range from 6 to 11 degrees C (Tuttle 1979). In the summer, maternity colonies prefer caves that act as warm air traps or that provide restricted rooms or domed ceilings that are capable of trapping the combined body heat from thousands of clustered individuals (Tuttle 1975, Tuttle and Stevenson 1977). Cave temperatures range from 14 to 24 C. Undisturbed summer colonies may contain up to 250,000 bats, and average 10,000 to 25,000 (Tuttle 1979). Summer caves are nearly always located within 1 km of a river or reservoir over which the bats forage (Tuttle 1979). Tuttle (1979) showed that forested areas along the banks of streams and lakes provide important protection for adults and young. Young often feed and take shelter in forest areas near the entrance to cave roosts (Tuttle 1979). Do not feed in areas along rivers or reservoirs where the forest has been cleared (LaVal et al. 1977; Tuttle and Stevenson, in prep.).

Yearlings and adult males segregate into nomadic summer colonies that tend to roost in caves within a few kilometers of ones selected by adult females (Layne 1978).

Systems
  • Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat

Gray bats are restricted entirely to areas with caves or cave-like habitats. These caves are in limestone karst areas of the southeastern United States. Gray bats do not inhabit barns or other similar structures. This leads to extremely restricted nesting opportunities. Due to their requirement of unique cave types, Gray bats can only use 0.1% of available caves in the winter and 2.4% in the summer.

Ninety-five percent of the total Gray bat population hibernates in only eight or nine caves. Two are located in Tennessee, three in Missouri, one in Kentucky, one in Alabama, and one in Arkansas. The Arkansas hibernation cave houses about 250,000 Gray bats. The winter caves utilized by Gray bats have deep, vertical passages with large rooms that function as cold air traps. The temperature of these caves ranges between 6 and 11 degrees Celsius (42 and 52 degrees Fahrenheit).

As they are for the winter sites, gray bats are highly selective for caves providing specific temperature and roost conditions in the summer. These caves are warm, ranging between 14 and 25 degrees Celsius (57 and 77 degrees Fahrenheit). As an alternative to finding a cave within this temperature range, they can roost in caves with small rooms or dorms that trap the body heat of the roosting bats. Summer colonies of gray bats occupy a home range that often contains several roosting caves scattered along as much as 81 kilometers of river or lake shore. Banding studies have indicated that gray bats prefer summer caves that have a feeding area (river or other reservoir of water) not over 2 kilometers away. Despite this, they have been known to fly as far as 19 kilometers from the colony to feed.

Habitat Regions: temperate ; terrestrial

Other Habitat Features: riparian

  • Kentucky Bat Working Group, 1999. "Gray Bat" (On-line). Accessed November 2, 2001 at http://www.biology.eku.edu/bats/graybat.htm.
  • Tuttle, M. 1986. "Endangered Gray Bat Benefits From Protection" (On-line). Accessed November 2, 2001 at http://www.batcon.org/batsmag/v4n4-1.html.
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlfe Service, 1992. "Gray Bat in North Carolina" (On-line). Accessed November 2, 2001 at http://nc-es.fws.gov/mammal/graybat.html.
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1997. "Gray Bat" (On-line). Accessed November 2, 2001 at http://midwest.fws.gov/endangered/mammals/grbat_fc.html.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Roost sites are nearly exclusively restricted to caves throughout the year (Hall and Wilson 1966, Barbour and Davis 1969, Tuttle 1976), though only a few percent of available caves are suitable (Tuttle 1979). Winter roosts are in deep vertical caves with domed halls. Large summer colonies utilize caves that trap warm air and provide restricted rooms or domed ceilings; maternity caves often have a stream flowing through them and are separate from the caves used in summer by males.

Occasionally non-cave roost sites are used. Hays and Bingman (1964) reported a colony in a storm sewer in Pittsburg, Kansas and, in 1988, a maternity colony was discovered using a storm sewer in Kansas (Decher and Choate 1988). Harvey and McDaniel (1988) located a maternity colony in a storm sewer in downtown Newark, Independence County, Arkansas. There are occasional reports of mines (Sealander 1979, Thom 1981, Brack et al. 1984, Harvey 1988) and buildings (Gunier and Elder 1971) being used as roost sites.

Winter caves are deep and vertical and provide a large volume of air below the lowest entrance that acts as a cold air trap (Tuttle 1976). Cold air flows in and is trapped during successive winters, providing mean annual temperatures 6 degrees C or more below the above-ground mean annual temperature (Tuttle 1978). Winter cave temperatures range from 6 to 11 degrees C (Tuttle 1979).

In the summer, maternity colonies prefer caves that act as warm air traps or that provide restricted rooms or domed ceilings that are capable of trapping the combined body heat from thousands of clustered individuals (Tuttle 1975, Tuttle and Stevenson 1977). Cave temperatures range from 14 to 24 C. Undisturbed summer colonies may contain up to 250,000 bats, and average 10,000 to 25,000 (Tuttle 1979). Summer caves are nearly always located within 1 km of a river or reservoir over which the bats forage (Tuttle 1979).

Tuttle (1979) showed that forested areas along the banks of streams and lakes provide important protection for adults and young. Young often feed and take shelter in forest areas near the entrance to cave roosts (Tuttle 1979). Do not feed in areas along rivers or reservoirs where the forest has been cleared (LaVal et al. 1977; Tuttle and Stevenson, in prep.).

Yearlings and adult males segregate into nomadic summer colonies that tend to roost in caves within a few kilometers of ones selected by adult females (Layne 1978).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Migration

Non-Migrant: No. All populations of this species make significant seasonal migrations.

Locally Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).

Locally Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.

Wintering caves often are hundreds of kilometers from summer range; Tuttle (1976) reported one-way migration distances of 17-525 kilometers. In some areas the same caves are used in winter and summer; in other areas (e.g., Missouri, Arkansas) many caves used in summer are vacant in winter. Most Florida breeders migrate north to hibernate in cooler caves of northern Alabama and central Tennessee; migration occurs mostly in September-October, some as late as November or December (Layne 1978), females preceding males. Females depart wintering caves in late March and early April, males in late April and May. Evidence suggests that bats migrate in small flocks (Barbour and Davis 1969). Small caves may be used as rest stops (Smith and Parmalee 1954).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Trophic Strategy

Food Habits

M. grisescens forages over streams and reservoirs where they consume night-flying aquatic insects. Like all microchiropterans, gray bats rely on echolocation to locate their food.

Most foraging occurs within 5 meters of the water surface over which they are feeding.

Until most recently, studies focusing on the diet of gray bats were not preformed. Data on this subject are therefore preliminary. Whether gray bats are opportunistic or selective feeders is still in debate. Recent studies suggest that this species feeds selectively, but more information is needed.

Originally it was thought that gray bats fed primarily on mayflies. M. grisescens has been seen feeding in large swarms of mayflies, but this insect has not been turning up in fecal analysis in the proportion that might have been expected. It is possible that mayflies are wholly digested, thus not often seen in the fecal records.

Analysis of gray bat feces has shown that thes bats most often select moths, flies, and beetles as prey when these species are present.

Other prey includes spiders, bugs, leafhoppers, scorpionflies, lacewings, dragonflies, stoneflies, grasshoppers, thrips and wasps. Various insects occur sporadically in fecal pellet analysis.

Animal Foods: insects; terrestrial non-insect arthropods

Primary Diet: carnivore (Insectivore )

  • Best, T., B. Milam, T. Haas, W. Cvilikas, L. Saidak. 1997. Variation in diet of the gray bat (*Myotis Grisescens*). Journal of Mammalogy, 78(2): 569-583.
  • Lacki, M., L. Burford, J. Whitaker, Jr.. 1995. Food habits of gray bats in Kentucky. Journal of Mammalogy, 76(4): 1256-1259.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Feeds mostly upon flying insects, including mayflies (Choroterpes spp., STENOCRON spp.) and beetles (Tuttle et al., Lacki et al. 1995); diet may vary with local resources and habitat.

Foraging is generally parallel to streams, over the water at heights of 2 to 3 m (LaVal et al. 1977). Caire et al. (1989) stated that this bats is apparently adapted to forest foraging and rarely is collected in the open or over streams; geographic variation? The energy demands on adult females are tremendous during lactation, and individual females sometimes feed continuously for seven or more hours per night (Tuttle and Stevenson).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Associations

Ecosystem Roles

One bat can catch up to 3,000 insects in one night. Because of this, they play an important role in the checks and balances of nature as the primary controllers of night-flying aquatic insects.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Predation

Gray bats may fall prey to howks, owls, skunks, foxes, mice, snakes, and housecats. Anti-predator adaptations include avoiding crowded cave entrances and flying more rapidly when exiting and entering the cave.

Known Predators:

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Known predators

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© SPIRE project

Source: SPIRE

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Known prey organisms

Myotis grisescens preys on:
Arthropoda
Insecta

This list may not be complete but is based on published studies.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© SPIRE project

Source: SPIRE

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population Biology

Number of Occurrences

Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.

Estimated Number of Occurrences: 6 - 20

Comments: About 95% of entire known population hibernates in eight or nine caves, over half in one cave.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Abundance

>1,000,000 individuals

Comments: Total population was estimated at 1.5 million in the early 1980s. About 10,000 are thought to occur in Florida in summer, a few hundred in winter (Wenner, Gore, cited by Humphrey 1992). Five gated maternity caves in Oklahoma each include 10,000 or 20,000 bats (Hensley 2003).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

Forage in loose groups, but become territorial when insect numbers decrease; territories seem to be controlled by reproductively-active females (Tuttle et al.).

Each summer colony occupies a traditional home range that often contains several roosting caves scattered along as much as 70 kilometers of river or reservoir borders. Individuals forage along rivers or shoreline up to 20 km from their roosts (LaVal et al. 1977, Tuttle and Stevenson 1977).

Elder and Gunier (1981) determined that the mean annual survival rate is about 70% in males and 73% in females. Stevenson and Tuttle (1981) found that the after-first-year survival rate is about 55 to 85% in relatively undisturbed colonies, and 57 to 66% in disturbed colonies. The oldest bat recovered was about 16 years old, but Stevenson and Tuttle (1981) believe that maximum longevity could be 39 years. Mortality is especially high in spring migration when fat reserves and food supply are low (Tuttle and Stevenson 1977).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Behavior

Communication and Perception

As in all mammals, there are a variety of means of communication. Bats use vocalizations to communicate with each other while they are in their roosts. Mothers and infants use tactile and vocal communication. There are probably some scent cues which help mothers to recognize their young.

Echolocation is used primarily to locate food. However, communication also occurs between predator and prey through echolocation. Some insects (particularly moths) can receive the sonar pulses from the bats and fly erratically to avoid being eaten.

Communication Channels: visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical

Perception Channels: visual ; acoustic ; echolocation

  • Feldhamer, G., L. Drickamer, S. Vessey, J. Merritt. 1999. Mammalogy: Adaptation, Diversity, and Ecology. San Francisco: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Cyclicity

Comments: Females enter hibernation in fall after mating, followed by males and juveniles several weeks later (most females are hibernating by early October, most others are in hibernatation by early November). Adult females emerge from hibernation late March-early April. Others emerge mid-April to mid-May (Tuttle 1976). Forages at night.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life Cycle

Development

After entering the winter cave, female Gray Bats are inseminated by sexually active male bats. The females exhibit delayed fertilization. After copulating, the females hold the sperm through hibernation. Fertilization between the sperm and ova occurs when the female emerges from hibernation. Females do not reach sexual maturity until they are two years old. For their size, bats are among the world’s slowest reproducing mammal.

 One offspring per sexually mature female is born in June when the colonies have migrated to their summer ranges. The period between birth and weaning is two months. During these two months there is segregation between members of the colony. The adult females and their newborns roost in maternity caves. The adult males and yearlings of both sexes roost in bachelor caves. By August, all the juveniles are flying (most are capable of flight 20-25 days after birth) and general mixing and dispersal of the colony occurs over the summer range. The growth rates of young vary with the temperature at the maternity roosts. It has been discovered that young in warmer roost situations grow more rapidly. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1992; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Endangered Species, 1991)

Development - Life Cycle: colonial growth

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life Expectancy

Lifespan/Longevity

The maximum lifespan for gray bats is 14-15 years.

Typical lifespan

Status: wild:
14 to 15 years.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

Maximum longevity: 16.5 years (wild)
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Joao Pedro de Magalhaes

Source: AnAge

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

Reproduction

Information on the mating system of these animals is sparse. They are reportedly polygynous.

Mating System: polygynous

Breeding in this species occurs shortly after the bats enter their hiberation caves. After entering the winter cave, the female gray bat is inseminated. Females exhibit delayed fertilization. After copulating, a female holds the sperm through hibernation. Fertilization of ova occurs when the female emerges from hibernation.

Females do not reach sexual maturity until they are two years old. For their size, bats are among the world’s slowest reproducing mammal.

Females give birth to a single offspring in June, after migration to the summer caves has taken place. The period between birth and weaning is two months. During these two months there is segregation between members of the colony. The adult females and their newborns roost in maternity caves. The adult males and yearlings of both sexes roost in bachelor caves.

By August, all the juveniles are flying (most are capable of flight 20-25 days after birth) and general mixing and dispersal of the colony occurs over the summer range.

The growth rates of young vary with the temperature at the maternity roosts. It has been discovered that young in warmer roost situations grow more rapidly.

Breeding interval: These animals breed once per year.

Breeding season: Breeding occurs in the fall, when the bats enter their winter caves.

Range number of offspring: 1 to 1.

Average weaning age: 60 days.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female): 2 years.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male): 2 years.

Key Reproductive Features: iteroparous ; seasonal breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); fertilization (Internal ); viviparous ; sperm-storing ; delayed fertilization

Average birth mass: 2.9 g.

Average number of offspring: 1.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male)

Sex: male:
456 days.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)

Sex: female:
456 days.

As in all mammals, the mother provides milk to her growing young. Neonate gray bats are altricial. The mother attends to her young in a nursery cave. This is especially interesting, because the mother can locate her own offspring among the hundreds of baby bats which may be in the cave.

Parental Investment: altricial ; pre-hatching/birth (Provisioning: Female, Protecting: Female); pre-weaning/fledging (Provisioning: Female, Protecting: Female)

  • Kentucky Bat Working Group, 1999. "Gray Bat" (On-line). Accessed November 2, 2001 at http://www.biology.eku.edu/bats/graybat.htm.
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlfe Service, 1992. "Gray Bat in North Carolina" (On-line). Accessed November 2, 2001 at http://nc-es.fws.gov/mammal/graybat.html.
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Endangered Species, 1991. "Gray Bat" (On-line). Accessed November 2, 2001 at http://endangered.fws.gov/i/a/saa4l.html.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Mating occurs in September-October. Adult females store sperm through the winter and become pregnant soon after emergence from hibernation (Gutherie and Jeffers 1938). One young is born late in May or in early June (reported as mid-June for Oklahoma; flying as early as late June or early July). In Florida, young are weaned in mid-July (Layne 1978). Larger colonies are more successful in raising young. Most young are able to fly in 20-35 days, depending on colony size (may include up to 100,000+). First breeds in second year (Layne 1978).

Tuttle (1975) showed that growth rates of non-volant young are positively correlated with colony size, probably because increasing numbers of bats clustering together reduce the thermoregulatory cost per individual (Herreid 1963, 1967). In larger colonies, most young begin to fly from 20 to 25 days after birth, while in smaller colonies, or where colonies have been reduced due to disturbance, this time is increased to 30 to 35 days (Tuttle 1976). In severely reduced colonies, the young sometimes die before achieving flight (Tuttle in Brady et al. 1982). For newly volant young, growth rates and survival are inversely proportional to the distance from their roost to the nearest over-water foraging habitat (Tuttle 1976). Although mothers continue to nurse young for a period after the young are flying, juveniles are apparently left to learn how to hunt on their own (Tuttle and Stevenson).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
NT
Near Threatened

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2008

Assessor/s
Arroyo-Cabrales, J. & Timm, R.

Reviewer/s
Medellín, R. (Chiroptera Red List Authority) & Schipper, J. (Global Mammal Assessment Team)

Contributor/s

Justification
Listed as Near Threatened because the species is considered threatened at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service but there are several recuperation programmes for this species reaching at the moment more than 1 million individuals. This species can be considered as a success for the conservation programmes carried out in USA. It could approach the criteria A1 for Vulnerable, considering that until the 80s the declining in the population was larger than 50%.

History
  • 1996
    Endangered
  • 1994
    Endangered
    (Groombridge 1994)
  • 1990
    Endangered
    (IUCN 1990)
  • 1988
    Endangered
    (IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1988)
  • 1986
    Endangered
    (IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1986)
  • 1982
    Endangered
    (Thornback and Jenkins 1982)
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation Status

M. grisescens is considered endangered by both the United States Fish and Wildlife service, according to the Endangered Species Act, and the IUCN Red List. Although CITES does not list this species of bat on Appendix I, II, or III, it is difficult to see why.

Gray bats began encountering problems in prehistorical times when tribes of Native Americans began camping and living in the entrances of caves. The smoke from their fires likely suffocated the bats. It is also thought that they were placed in stews by Native Americans.

Guano was extracted from nearly every substantial gray bat cave in the south during the Civil War. This guano was used for gunpowder, not for fertilizer, as is commonly thought. It is thought that gray bat colonies suffered some of their largest losses during the Civil War. Studies of guano deposits in formerly occupied caves shows that gray bats (a highly resilient species) were able to prosper once again in spite of these losses.

Currently, the biggest threat to gray bat populations appears to be human disturbance at hibernation and maternity colonies. The bats in the maternity colonies do not tolerate disturbance, especially when flightless newborn young are present. Thousands of baby bats may be dropped to their deaths or abandoned by panicked parents. A colony will even completely abandon a cave in the presence of excessive disturbance. This is particularly bad because so few caves are habitable for gray bats. Starvation in the winter can also be a problem. When bats are aroused during hibernation, their important fat reserves are used up more quickly. If the disturbance is intense or frequent enough the bats may starve to death.

Despite once being one of the most abundant mammals of the southeastern United States, M. grisescens has been listed as an endangered species since 1976. In 1970 the population was estimated at 2.25 million bats after a census of 120 caves. However, a census in 1976 of 22 of the 120 caves found that these colonies had declined by an average of 54 percent each.

Other factors that influence the decline of Gray Bat populations are: vandalism, cave commercialization, toxins (like organochlorine pesticides, PCB’s, and lead), natural causes like cave-ins and flooding (killing bats and destroying important habitat), loss of caves by inundation by man-made impoundments, and reduction of insect prey over streams that have been degragaded by excessive pollution and siltation. (Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, 199; Clawson and Clark, 1989)

Improper gating at cave entrances also presents a problem. Gates must allow the airflow, temperature, humidity, and amount of light entering the cave to be the same as it was prior to the gate installment. Although steel bar gates do provide excellent protection from humans, these gates may be detrimental to bats by giving predators a place to perch and wait for bats to emerge. It has also been found that bats prefer to use un-gated entrances. The alternative, if possible, would be to put up a chain link fence topped with barbedwire around the cave. This would prevent humans from entering the bats' caves, and allow the bats to fly OVER the gate, rather than through it. This would also protect them from predators perched on the gates.

Due to protective increases at high priority colony sites, declines in M. grisescens populations have been halted in some locations, and others exhibit an increase in population. Currently there are about 1.5 million gray bats in existence. Important conservation measures that have been taken to aid in the stabilization of the population, especially the acquisition of caves by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This organization is currently in control of Blowing Wind Cave in northern Alabama. This is the most important summer cave for gray bats known. Fern Cave is the largest hibernaculum for gray bats and is also under the protection of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Additional conservation measures are needed to help M. grisescens. The purchase and protection through proper gating and restricted use of other gray bat caves is very important. Education of spelunkers and other cave visitors who may unintentionally disturb the bats is key, as well as the continuation of federal efforts to reduce pesticide use (or at least limit their lifetime in the environment).

Temperate North American bats are now threatened by a fungal disease called “white-nose syndrome.” This disease has devastated eastern North American bat populations at hibernation sites since 2007. The fungus, Geomyces destructans, grows best in cold, humid conditions that are typical of many bat hibernacula. The fungus grows on, and in some cases invades, the bodies of hibernating bats and seems to result in disturbance from hibernation, causing a debilitating loss of important metabolic resources and mass deaths. Mortality rates at some hibernation sites have been as high as 90%. While there are currently no reports of Myotis grisescens mortalities as a result of white-nose syndrome, the disease continues to expand its range in North America.

US Federal List: endangered

CITES: no special status

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: near threatened

  • Cryan, P. 2010. "White-nose syndrome threatens the survival of hibernating bats in North America" (On-line). U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center. Accessed September 16, 2010 at http://www.fort.usgs.gov/WNS/.
  • National Park Service, Wildlife Health Center, 2010. "White-nose syndrome" (On-line). National Park Service, Wildlife Health. Accessed September 16, 2010 at http://www.nature.nps.gov/biology/wildlifehealth/White_Nose_Syndrome.cfm.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National NatureServe Conservation Status

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N3 - Vulnerable

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G3 - Vulnerable

Reasons: Occurs mainly in the cave region of the eastern and central U.S.; highly vulnerable to disturbance; only a few caves contain most of the individuals; as a result of ongoing cave protection efforts, the total population is increasing.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Current Listing Status Summary

Status: Endangered
Date Listed: 04/28/1976
Lead Region:   Great Lakes-Big Rivers Region (Region 3) 
Where Listed:


Population detail:

Population location: entire
Listing status: E

For most current information and documents related to the conservation status and management of Myotis grisescens , see its USFWS Species Profile

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Status

Endangered.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution

Source: Smithsonian's North American Mammals

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
Total population was estimated at 1.5 million in the early 1980s. About 10,000 are thought to occur in Florida in summer, a few hundred in winter (Humphrey 1992). Five gated maternity caves in Oklahoma each include 10,000 or 20,000 bats (Hensley 2003). Since listing, several critical hibernation caves have been gated, leading to stable and growing population in many areas.

Population Trend
Increasing
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Short Term Trend: Relatively stable (=10% change)

Comments: Cave protection efforts have led to recent population increases. By 1991, the rangewide population was stable and perhaps growing, apparently due to successful cave protection efforts (End. Sp. Tech. Bull. 16(6):9; Figg 1991). Since 1981, the maternity colony population in Oklahoma has increased from 56,000 to almost 150,000 (Grigsby et al. 1993, Hensley 2003).

The recovery plan criteria for change from endangered status to threatened status is documentation of permanent protection of 90% of Priority 1 hibernacula and documentation of stable or increasing populations at 75% of Priority 1 maternity caves during a period of five years; recent studies indicate that these criteria have been met (Harvey and Currie 2002).

Global Long Term Trend: Decline of 30-70%

Comments: Abundance declined by at least 50% from the 1960s to the early 1980s (Brady et al. 1982). The number of occupied caves has substantially decreased. In Missouri, 26 of 66 caves used historically by this species and surveyed in 1994 showed no evidence of recent use (see Figg and Bessken 1995). See Layne (1978) for information on decline in Florida.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Threats

Major Threats
Abundance declined by at least 50% from the 1960s to the early 1980s (Brady et al. 1982). The number of occupied caves has substantially decreased. In Missouri, 26 of 66 caves used historically by this species and surveyed in 1994 showed no evidence of recent use. See Layne 1978 for information on decline in Florida.

Cave disturbance has been the major factor in the decline. Cave protection efforts have greatly reduced this threat.

Although there are apparently few current threats, the use of forestry insecticides and crop pesticides in areas adjacent to riparian corridors where gray bats forage may reduce the prey base or kill bats that ingest contaminated insects (Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center). Some maternity and hibernating colonies are susceptible to human disturbance (Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center).

Decline began with cave disturbance associated with saltpeter production during the Civil War. Some of the largest colonies were lost as a result of cave commercialization. Some caves were improperly gated.

The species is especially vulnerable due to its high fidelity to particular favoured caves, and it is very sensitive to disturbance, including the mere presence of humans with lights; disturbance may result in bats moving to less favourable roosting places.

Other threats include pesticides, deforestation, and impoundment of waterways (and subsequent cave inundation).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Degree of Threat: AB

Comments: Cave disturbance has been the major factor in the decline. Cave protection efforts have greatly reduced this threat.

White-nose syndrome has been detected in this species, and this emerging disesase must be regarded as the major threat and one that could cause large, rapid declines.

The use of forestry insecticides and crop pesticides in areas adjacent to riparian corridors where gray bats forage may reduce the prey base or kill bats that ingest contaminated insects (Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center). Some maternity and hibernating colonies are susceptible to human disturbance (Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center).

Decline began with cave disturbance associated with saltpeter production during the Civil War. Some of the largest colonies were lost as a result of cave commercialization. Some caves were improperly gated.

The species is especially vulnerable due to its high fidelity to particular favored caves, and it is very sensitive to disturbance, including the mere presence of humans with lights; disturbance may result in bats moving to less favorable roosting places.

Other threats include pesticides, deforestation, and impoundment of waterways (and subsequent cave inundation).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
Cave protection efforts have led to recent population increases. By 1991, the rangewide population was stable and perhaps growing, apparently due to successful cave protection efforts. Since 1981, the maternity colony population in Oklahoma has increased from 56,000 to almost 150,000 (Hensley 2003).

The recovery plan criteria for change from endangered status to threatened status is documentation of permanent protection of 90% of Priority 1 hibernacula and documentation of stable or increasing populations at 75% of Priority 1 maternity caves during a period of five years; recent studies indicate that these criteria have been met (Harvey and Currie 2002).

The Tennessee Valley Authority sponsored a recovery project that resulted in the protection of two critical maternity sites: the Hambrick and Nickajack caves in Tennessee. Blowing Wind Cave in northern Alabama, the most important summer cave known for gray bats, has been acquired by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and a gate has been placed across the entrance. Fern Cave, the largest known gray bat hibernaculum, has also been purchased by the Fish and Wildlife Service and is being managed for protection of the bats. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service also has acquired and protects additional caves in Alabama. To protect habitat, The Nature Conservancy has established six voluntary protection agreements with private landowners for gray bat maternity sites. The National Park Service restricts human access to six gray bat maternity caves on its lands and monitors them for possible disturbance. The Indiana Bat and Gray Bat Comprehensive Plan contains a detailed list of caves that have been protected or are currently being managed.

Identify all caves used for different stages of the life history. Occupied caves should be protected from human disturbance.

A buffer of undisturbed vegetation should be left around the entrances of caves inhabited by gray bats; wooded travel corridors between roosting and foraging sites should be protected; the use of herbicides and pesticides in areas adjacent to foraging and roost sites should be carefully controlled and monitored for unanticipated adverse effects (Alabama Forestry Commission).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Restoration Potential: The factors that make the gray bat vulnerable also make cave protection feasible. Since the majority of the population utilizes relatively few caves, protection of these sites should aid gray bat recovery (Resetarits, pers. comm., 1982). The ability to control factors such as water pollution, siltation, deforestation, and pesticide use will influence the ability of the gray bat to recover. As of 1992, the potential for recovery was very good. Some caves have had spectacular increases in gray bat populations due to proper gating and signs. In some instances, protecting caves that been abandoned has resulted in re-occupation (Currie, pers. comm., 1992).

Preserve Selection and Design Considerations: Winter roosts (hibernacula), summer maternity colonies, and bachelor caves should be protected. Migratory (temporary) roosts may also merit protection if they are permanent. Buffer zones of forest should be maintained and forested corridors to prime forage areas over river sand reservoirs protected. Steps should be taken to reduce pollution of waterways, siltation, or use of pesticides near caves (Resetarits, pers. comm., 1982).

Management Requirements: Major management concerns include reducing human disturbance at the cave site. Properly designed physical barriers are critical. Improperly constructed gates can alter the air flow, trap debris, and block the entrance by not allowing enough flight space (Brady et al. 1982). Temperature and humidity are directly related to the number of entrances to a cave. Most hibernating bats require exceptionally cold caves for hibernation and unusually warm caves for summer. Improperly constructed physical barriers can alter the exchange of air with the outside environment, which may cause significant changes in interior temperatures and humidity, causing the bats to abandon the cave (Currie, pers. comm., 1992). Improperly constructed gates may also subject the bats to severe predation as they attempt to pass through the gates (Tuttle 1977). Gray bats have accepted all properly designed gates but will not accept full gates (i.e., gates that completely fill the entrance). Wildlife managers should consult with members of the Gray Bat Recovery Team. Tuttle (1977) and Tuttle and Stevenson (1977) provided details on acceptable types of physical barriers. See also White and Seginak (1987) for information on gate design.

Public education and elimination of trails leading to cave entrances are important (Tuttle 1979, Brady et al. 1982). Signs may be appropriate at caves that are rarely visited or in conjunction with physical barriers. They should be located so that they are visible to people but do not impede flying bats or air flow. Brady et al. (1982) gave suggestions on the wording of signs. Signs may not be appropriate if they would attract people to an entrance that they otherwise would not have seen. Educating the public about the benefits of bats and communicating with local spelunkers and researchers should help reduce unintentional disturbance. Most people do not find caves if there is no trail leading to the entrance. Covering trails or preventing boat access will also reduce human disturbance.

Of importance are restoration of degraded foraging habitat and protection against environmental disturbance. Human disturbance at the cave site is a major cause of population decline (Barbour and Davis 1969, Tuttle 1979). Disturbance at maternity caves can result in thousands of flightless young being dislodged and falling to their deaths (Tuttle 1979). Caves used by nusery colonies should not be entered from late April through at least mid-July, particularly late May through early July (Brady et al. 1982); if a cave must be entered during this period, it should be restricted to a one-hour visit immediately following the evening emergence of adults (Layne 1978). Disturbance during the winter causes partial or complete arousal from hibernation. Brady et al. (1982) pointed out that a number of human disturbances during winter can exhaust the bats' limited energy reserves and result in a high mortality rate. Tuttle (in Brady et al. 1982) found that weight loss among gray bats during the first hour after arousal was 0.48 grams, compared to a normal hibernation loss of 0.01 grams per day.

Pesticides represent a major threat to the gray bat (Clark et al. 1978, 1980, 1982). At least one colony has been destroyed because of pesticide poisoning (Clark 1983). Dieldrin is a daughter product of aldrin and is sprayed in corn fields to control cutworms (larvae of Noctuidae moths; Clark et al. 1978). Bats consume moths with dieldrin and juvenile gray bats receive concentrated amounts through the female's milk. The rapid fat utilization in juveniles because of the stress of flight initiation can cause fatal concentrations in brain tissues (Clark et al. 1978). Dieldrin was banned in 1974, but provisions were made to use existing stocks. Clark et al. (1980) documented deaths in gray bats from heptachlor residues reflecting a change by local farmers from aldrin to heptachlor as stocks of aldrin have become depleted. Guano analyses can be used to identify major contaminants affecting bat populations.

Destruction of food, foraging habitats, and caves is also a management concern. Mayfly larvae are susceptible to aquatic pollution, turbidity, and siltation caused by strip mines in the watershed or farming practices (Fremling 1968, Tuttle 1979). Deforestation of the watershed reduces foraging habitat (LaVal et al. 1977, Tuttle and Stevenson in prep.). Young gray bats use the forest near the cave entrance for cover while perfecting flight abilities (Tuttle 1976). Both juveniles and adults use forested areas for protection from predators, specifically screech owls (Tuttle 1979). Impoundment of waterways has submerged important cave sites and made other caves more accessible to humans (Barbour and Davis 1969, LaVal et al. 1977, Tuttle 1979, Brady et al. 1982).

Natural calamities, such as submersion of the cave during a flood or a natural cave-in, also affect gray bat populations (Tuttle 1979). Flood frequency and magnitude can be affected by channelization and other human activities.

A revised and updated edition of The Indiana Bat and Gray Bat Comprehensive plan is in preparation and may be available by fall of 1992 (Clawson, pers. comm.).

Management Research Needs: Research the effects of habitat disturbance, water pollution, and siltation on food sources and the effects of pesticides and deforestation on population trends.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Protection: Several to many (4-40) occurrences appropriately protected and managed

Comments: The Tennessee Valley Authority sponsored a recovery project that resulted in the protection of two critical maternity sites: the Hambrick and Nickajack caves in Tennessee. Blowing Wind Cave in northern Alabama, the most important summer cave known for gray bats, has been acquired by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and a gate has been placed across the entrance. Fern Cave, the largest known gray bat hibernaculum, has also been purchased by the Fish and Wildlife Service and is being managed for protection of the bats. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service also has acquired and protects additional caves in Alabama. To protect habitat, The Nature Conservancy has established six voluntary protection agreements with private landowners for gray bat maternity sites. The National Park Service restricts human access to six gray bat maternity caves on its lands and monitors them for possible disturbance. The Indiana Bat and Gray Bat Comprehensive Plan contains a detailed list of caves that have been protected or are currently being managed.

Needs: Occupied caves should be protected from human disturbance.

A buffer of undisturbed vegetation should be left around the entrances of caves inhabited by gray bats; wooded travel corridors between roosting and foraging sites should be protected; the use of herbicides and pesticides in areas adjacent to foraging and roost sites should be carefully controlled and monitored for unanticipated adverse effects (Alabama Forestry Commission).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems

Benefits

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

They do not adversely affect humans. Gray Bats are great!

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

Insectivorous bats remove millions of insects a night, aiding in the control of these populations. Also, because of their roosting habits, inhabiting a small number of specific caves for long periods of time, these bats produce huge piles of feces on the floors of caves. Historically, this guano was used to make gunpowder during the civil war. Also, native americans used to eat these bats in stews.

Positive Impacts: food ; body parts are source of valuable material; produces fertilizer; controls pest population

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Risks

Stewardship Overview: Stewardship needs include : (1) land protection agreements for important caves (consult U.S. Fish and Wildlife Recovery Plan), (2) gating, fencing, and/or posting of cave entrances (consult U.S. Fish and Wildlife and members of the Gray Bat Recovery Team), (3) protection and restoration of foraging habitat, and (4) monitoring of populations (consult U.S. Fish and Wildlife).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Gray Bat

Myotis grisescens (Gray Bat) once flourished in caves all over the southeastern United States, but due to human disturbance, Gray Bat populations declined severely during the early and mid portion of the 20th century. At one cave alone, the Georgetown Cave in Northwestern Alabama, populations declined from 150,000 Gray Bats to 10,000 by 1969.[2] In 1976, M. grisescens was placed on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s endangered species list and put under the protection of the Endangered Species Act.[3] Gray Bat populations were estimated at approximately 2 million bats around the time they were placed on the Endangered Species list. By the early 1980s populations of Gray Bats dropped to 1.6 million. With conservation efforts in place, in 2002, Gray Bat populations were estimated to have reached 2.3 million bats.[4]

Contents

Population Biology

M. grisescens are the largest members of their genus in the eastern United States. Of all U.S. mammals, Gray Bats are, perhaps, the most cave-dependent.[5]

Description

Gray Bats have uni-colored dark gray fur on their backs that may bleach to a russet or chestnut brown after the molting season (July or August). Unlike in other species of Myotis, where the wing membrane connects to the toe, in M. grisescens, the wing membrane connects to the ankle. Gray Bats typically weigh between 7 and 16 grams.[6] Gray Bats can live up to 17 years, but only about 50% of Gray Bats survive to maturity. Sexual maturity occurs at about age 2.[7] Although an adult Gray Bats forearm measures only about 40–46 mm,[8] Gray Bats with forearm lengths of 39.5 mm (approx. 1.55 in) or less cannot fly.[9] The flight speed of the Gray Bat, M. grisescens, has been calculated at 20.3 km/h (12.61 mph) during migration. While foraging, Gray Bats have been clocked at a flying rate of anywhere between 17 km/h and 39 km/h.[10]

Distribution

Gray Bats live in limestone karst areas in Alabama, northern Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Tennessee, northwestern Florida, western Georgia, southern Kansas, southern Indiana, southern and southwestern Illinois, northeastern Oklahoma, northeastern Mississippi, western Virginia, and possibly western North Carolina.[11] Gray Bats are cave obligate (or cave dependent) bats, meaning that with very few exceptions (in which cave-like conditions are created in man-made structures) Gray Bats only live in caves, not in abandoned barns or other structures as other species of bats are known to do.[12] Less than 5 percent of all available caves are inhabited by Gray Bats.[13] Thus, any disturbance to these cave habitats can be extremely detrimental to Gray Bat populations.

Migration, Hibernation, and Reproduction

Fall migration occurs in approximately the same order as spring emergence, with females departing first (early September for fall migration) and juveniles leaving last (mid-October). Gray Bats may migrate as far as 500 km (310 mi) from summer caves in order to reach hibernation caves.[14] The annual activity period of Gray Bats is April to October, though female Gray Bats enter hibernation in September.[15]

After arriving at winter caves, copulation occurs. Females immediately enter hibernation, while males may remain active for a few more weeks.[16] Males use this extra time before entering hibernation to replenish fat reserves used during breeding.[17] Males begin hibernation by early November. During hibernation, the body temperature of Gray Bats drops close to the ambient temperature, allowing the body to conserve fat. These fat reserves must last the approximately six months of hibernation and spring migration.[18] Adult mortality is especially high during spring migration, as bats that do not have sufficient fat reserves have difficulties surviving the stress and energy-intensive migration period.[19] After copulation, females store sperm in their uteri, ovulating only after they have emerged from hibernation. Gestation in Gray Bats lasts 60 to 70 days, with birth occurring in late May and early June. Gray Bat females give birth to one offspring per clutch (bout of reproduction), thus giving birth to one offspring per year. Therefore, Gray Bats demonstrate an iteroparous life-history strategy. The young clings to the mother for about a week, after which they remain in the maternity colony until they become Volant (are able to fly). Most young take flight by four weeks of age (late June to mid-July).[20]

Molting

Annual molting occurs between early June and early August, during which Gray Bats ingest larger amounts of hair than at other times during the activity season. During grooming, Gray Bats also ingest ectoparasites such as chiggers that live in their fur. Gray Bats are believed to groom extensively before beginning their nightly hunt. They then spend the nighttime hours hunting and digesting.[21]

Cave Characteristics

Although the habitat range of the Gray Bat incorporates much of the southeastern United States,[22] the largest summer colonies of Gray Bats are located within the Guntersville Reservoir. This reservoir, found in northeastern Alabama, contains the Sauta (formerly Blowing Wind) and Hambrick caves which can accommodate over 100,000 Gray Bats.[23] Gray Bats use caves differently at different times of the year. For example, populations of Gray Bats tend to cluster in caves known as hibernacula to prepare for winter hibernation. In contrast, their populations disperse during the spring to establish sexually segregated colonies.[24] Females form maternity colonies (also known as summer maternity roosts) while males aggregate in non-maternity, or bachelor colonies. These bachelor colonies also house yearlings of both sexes.[25] Gray Bats also utilize a third type of cave, the dispersal cave, which they inhabit only during migration.[26] For their hibernacula, Gray Bats prefer deep, cool caves with average temperatures ranging from 5 to 11 °C. Multiple entrances and good airflow comprise the other characteristics that Gray Bats find desirable. Winter hibernacula are already cold when Gray Bats begin arriving in September. Summer caves are usually located along rivers and have temperatures that range from 14 to 25 °C.[27] Summer caves typically contain structural heat traps (including domed ceilings, small chambers, and porous rock surfaces) that capture the metabolic heat from the clustered Gray Bats, allowing the nursery populations to succeed. Preferred summer colony caves are within 1 km of a body of water and are rarely further than 4 km away from a lake or major river.[28] The average roosting density of Gray Bats is 1828 bats/m².[29]

Foraging Activity

Gray Bats forage over water, including streams and reservoirs, where they consume night-flying insects most of which have aquatic larval stages.[30] and in the riparian forests nearby these water sources.[31] M. grisescens activity tends to be concentrated over slower moving water or quiet pools than areas of fast moving water. Foraging usually occurs below treetop height but above 2m.[32] Gray Bats tend to fly downstream more often than upstream, suggesting a potential preference for wider sections typical of downstream sections as opposed to upstream portions (with a tendency to be narrower). M. grisescens tend to forage over extensive ranges, averaging 12.5 km but ranging from 2.5 km to 35.4 km.[33] While Gray Bats have been shown to forage in small groups when prey is abundant, especially during the early hours of the night, when prey is scarce, Gray Bats can become territorial. Territories tend to be controlled by reproductive females. These females seem to claim the same territory year after year.[34]

Diet

Gray Bats consume a variety of insects including Coleoptera (beetles), Diptera (flies), Ephemeroptera (mayflies, of which Gray Bats consume at least six species), Lepidoptera (moths), Neuroptera (net-winged insects), Trichoptera (caddis flies),[35] and Plecoptera (stoneflies).[36] Juveniles have a tendency to forage more in woodlands and eat more Coleopterans than adults, perhaps they provide a greater energy reward per unit of capture effort.[37] For example, Coleopterans provide 1900-2800 calories/g wet weight versus 800-1400 calories/g wet weight for ephemopterans. M. grisescens juveniles also eat a less diverse diet than adults, possibly because juveniles are more dependent on high concentrations of prey or swarming prey.[38] Gray Bats are believed to be part opportunists, and part selective eaters. (Outside of captivity, Gray Bats are limited by the sporadic emergences of potential prey. When prey emerges, there is only an abundance of a few taxa at any given time. The available taxa change based on the time of night, the month, and the time during the activity season.) In their natural habitats, Gray Bats appear to attack any moving target that is of appropriate size,[39] consistent with Optimal Foraging Theory that predicts palatable insects of an appropriate size should be eaten when encountered.[40] In captivity, under controlled laboratory conditions, however, insectivorous bats used echolocation to discriminate heavily among potential prey based on shape and texture of a target. This lack of discrimination may be because of the rapid flight of bats and the short range at which prey can be detected using echolocation, allowing bats only a fraction of a second after detection to capture prey. However, Gray Bats are believed to discriminate somewhat between insects when foraging in their natural habitat, consuming higher numbers of Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, and in some populations Trichoptera, than their proportional prevalence would have otherwise indicated without selective foraging.[41] Because of this tendency to select prey while being largely opportunistic, Gray Bats have been dubbed ‘selective opportunists’.[42] Scientists believe that food moves quickly through the digestive tract of M. grisescens, with feces being purged from the body within 1–2 hours prior to ingestion.[43]

Energy expenditure and growth

Gray Bats, as is the case in other organisms, acquire and use energy for growth and maintenance of their bodies before reaching sexual maturity, at which point much of their energy expenditure is devoted to reproductive processes. Gray Bats prefer caves located near appropriate foraging sites to reduce the energy costs of flying long distances to find food.[44] Gray Bats roost in large colonies to reduce the cost of temperature regulation on the individual .[45] Female bats must maintain relatively high body temperatures in comparison to the cooler temperatures of the cave during lactation, requiring large amounts of energy. During the peak lactation period, when young are roughly 20–30 days old, females may spend as many as 7 hours a night feeding. Because of the high energy demands on the females, larger roosts are more beneficial so that all may share the burden of maintaining body temperature.[46] The formation of large colonies does at some point, however, have a negative trade-off. As the size of the colony increases, intraspecific competition for food resources increase, forcing an individual to forage over a larger range. This increased foraging range will lead to greater energy expenditure, potentially reducing growth in Gray Bat juveniles.[47] The distance a Gray Bat travels from the roosting area to foraging area has been shown to be negatively correlated to the average weight of Gray Bats (the longer the distance the bat must fly in order to forage, the less the bat will weight), lending support to the idea that long flights are energetically costly.[48]

Factors leading to population decline

The tendency of Gray Bats to form large colonies made the Gray Bat especially vulnerable to population decline due to both intentional and unintentional human disturbance.[49] While Gray Bat habitat locations were always ‘patchy,’ Gray Bat habitats have become increasingly more isolated and fragmented with human perturbation.[50] Suspected factors contributing to species decline include impoundment of waterways (the creation of dams, which causes flooding in former bat caves), cave commercialization, natural flooding, pesticides, water pollution and siltation, and local deforestation.[51] All North American bat species classified as endangered or threatened by the US. Fish and Wildlife service are cave dwelling species.[52] Of these species, the Gray Bat congregates in larger numbers at fewer winter hibernacula than any other North American bat. Approximately 95% of Gray Bats hibernate in 11 winter hibernacula, with 31% hibernating in a single cave located in northern Alabama.[53] Because of their high population densities in appropriate habitats, Gray Bats serve as an important indicator species for conservation efforts.

Pesticide Use

Pesticide use and manufacturing have been one of the most prevalently studied contributions to population decline of M. grisescens. One such study focused on Gray Bat populations of the Tennessee River area of northern Alabama where scientists and conservators noted a higher than normal Gray Bat mortality. In this area, since 1947, large amounts of DDTR (DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane), DDD, and DDE) flowed through waterways from the DDT manufacturing site located on the Redstone Arsenal near Huntsville, Alabama down to the habitat area of M. grisescens, where heavycontamination of the local biota has occurred.[54] Lethal chemical concentrations of DDT in the brains of adult bats are about 1.5 times higher than in juveniles. Because M. grisescens feed on many types of insects with aquatic larval stages, it is believed that this food source may be the root of the chemical concentrations.[55] Many of the bats tested in different studies were juveniles not able to fly, and thus were likely to have only consumed milk. After concentration through lactation, a few parts per million in prey of the adult Gray Bat would cause mortality in these juveniles. Under conditions of rapid fat utilization, such as migratory stress or initiation of flight by juveniles, residue mobilization of harmful chemicals may occur, causing mortality.[56] Other pesticides linked with Gray Bat population decline include dieldrin and dieldrin’s parent compound aldrin, which have also increased mortality in other bat species.[57] Even though the manufacture of DDT ceased in 1970 and the manufacture of dieldrin and aldrin in October 1974, heavy contamination of the biota persisted. Recently, however, guano samples from various habitats indicate a decline in certain detrimental chemicals. For example, guano from Cave Springs cave shows a decline of 41% in DDE (a compound related to DDT) between 1976 and 1985 and guano from Key Cave shows a decline of 67% for the same time period. However, it is unknown how long these chemicals will remain in concentrations that will cause harm to wildlife.[58]

Human Disturbance

Direct human disturbance and vandalism is the major factor leading to population decline in Gray Bats. During the 1960s, bats were killed for entertainment purposes as they emerged from caves or were caught to be used for pranks. Many property-owners attempted to exterminate entire colonies due to unsubstantiated fears that the bats may be carrying rabies.[59] Bats that roost within 100m inside the cave and only 2m above the cave floor are especially prone to vandalism and high-intensity disturbance. Bats that roost in higher ceilings or further inside the cave are less prone to direct destruction. One study showed that caves with ceiling heights greater than 15 m above the floor were virtually protected from spelunkers.[60] Even without direct destruction, human visitation to caves can cause adverse effects on Gray Bat populations. Each human entry into a cave causes all bats within range of light or sound to at least partially arouse from hibernation.[61] Arousal of Gray Bats while they are hibernating can cause them to use up energy, lowering their energy reserves. Because these reserves must sustain the bats through hibernation and spring migration, if the bat runs out of reserves, it may leave the cave too soon, decreasing its chances of survival.[62] Each disturbance during hibernation is estimated to use energy that otherwise could sustain a Gray Bat through 10–30 days of undisturbed hibernation.[63] When flightless young are present in June and July, females escaping a predator or other disturbance may drop their young in the panic, leading to increased juvenile mortality.[64]

Cave Gating

Many factors play an important role in determining a viable habitat for M. grisescens. Among these are the natural characteristics of the cave entrance, physical features of the cave, and surface climate.[65] These contributing factors play an especially important role in determining the internal conditions that foster cave fauna. Because the Gray Bat is a cave dwelling species, its range is limited to caves whose internal conditions are favorable. Human intervention has caused a precipitous decline in the number of suitable caves for the Gray Bat.[66] Thus, in order to maximize the Gray Bat’s range, the United States government is funding cave gating programs. Cave gating is an accepted method in protecting cave dwelling species as it limits the impact of human disturbance upon internal cave conditions. In constructing internal cave gates, several key parameters were implemented to minimize changes in the airflow through the cave and the ability of the bats to either access or leave the cave. With these limitations in mind, the internal cave gating was placed 5 to 15 meters in advance of historically critical roost areas. In addition, a 15 cm clearance between bars of the gating was allowed to ensure unobstructed flight into and out of the cave.[67] Early cave gating methods that did not account for these factors frequently led to cave abandonment. In assessing the proficiency of cave gating, two metrics were established: population dynamics before and after the construction of cave gate and initiation of emergence from the cave.[68] Population estimates were derived from the accumulation of bat guano. More guano indicated the presence of a larger population. In manipulating the emergence of Gray Bats from the caves under study, infrared light sources were used. Observations of the frequency of emergence of the bats from open caves and gated caves confirm that gating is not an impediment.[69] Gated entrances, however, have provided new opportunities for natural predators of Gray Bats. Because gates sometimes require the bats to fly slower, as well as providing hunting perches to predators within reach of emerging bats, natural predation may be increased by cave gating.[70]

Protecting Populations

In their 1982 Gray Bat Recover Plan, the US Fish and Wildlife Service laid out steps to stop decline of Gray Bat populations and preserve Gray Bat habitats. In this plan, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service proposed purchasing the caves where Gray Bats are known to live, and at these locations reducing human access to prevent human disturbance. To reduce human impact on Gray Bat populations, gating, fencing, signposting, and surveillance by law enforcement may be utilized. Because Gray Bats use different caves depending on the season, efforts should be focused seasonally. Rivers, reservoir shorelines, and forests should be left intact near Gray Bat caves to allow for adequate foraging. Any activity occurring within a 25 km radius of a major Gray Bat cave, such as pesticide use, herbicide use, clearing, or any activity that may result in siltation should be carefully considered and revised if necessary. Government officials and landowners of property with Gray Bat caves should be educated about Gray Bats and potentially harmful activities. Finally, the US Fish and Wildlife Service recognized the need for continuing research from the scientific community to further understand human impact on this vulnerable species.[71]

Endangered Status

After 37 years without a single documented Gray Bat within the state boundaries of Mississippi, on September 20, 2004, a male Gray Bat was discovered in Tishomingo County in northeastern Mississippi, 42 km south of the last known location of M. grisescens before their decline and disappearance within the state of Mississippi. (Before this 2004 discovery, the only known Gray Bats lived at a site known as Chalk Mine, located in the northeastern portion of the county. Gray Bats had last been documented at Chalk Mine in 1967.) Extensive human disturbance, including the presence of trash, smoke, and graffiti, is believed to have affected the use of the Chalk Mine by bats. While the discovery of this bat is deemed as a positive sign by conservationists, it is possible that the bat was not from a Mississippi M. grisescens population. The closest known Gray Bat maternal colony, located at Blowing Springs Cave, Alabama, is 90 km northeast of where the 2004 Gray Bat was found, but because Gray Bats are known to forage over extensive areas, it is possible that this bat belonged to the Blowing Springs Cave colony.[72] In the western portion of the range of M. grisescens, from 1978 to 2002, M. grisescens populations at 21 of 48 (44%) maternity caves showed a significantly increasing trend, 17 (35%) had no trend, and 10 (21%) were decreasing. A study in 2003 that attempted a species-wide assessment in Gray Bat summer cave populations. This study found that of 76 maternity colonies, 3 (4%) were increasing, 66 (87%) had no discernable trends, and 7 (9%) had decreasing trends.[73] The Endangered Species Act requires that 90% of the most important hibernacula be protected and that populations at 75% of the most important maternity colonies be stable or increasing over a period of 5 years for the Gray Bat to be down-listed from endangered to threatened status. Because the range of the Gray Bat is so vast, and sampling techniques so varied and incomplete (thus data is somewhat unreliable when attempting to do species-wide census), Gray Bats are unlikely to be downgraded any time soon.[74] However, Gray Bat populations do appear to be increasing with stringent conservation efforts and educational programs, making the future of the Gray Bat far brighter today than when it came under the protection of the Endangered Species Act 35 years ago.

References

  1. ^ Arroyo-Cabrales, J. & Timm, R. (2008). "Myotis grisescens". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2. International Union for Conservation of Nature. http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/14132. Retrieved 27 January 2010. 
  2. ^ Bagley, F.M., D.R. Clark Jr., W.W. Johnson. (1987). “Northern Alabama Colonies of the Endangered Gray Bat Myotis grisescens: Organochlorine Contamination and Mortality.” Biological Conservation 43: 213-225. <http://www.sciencedirect.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V5X-48XKF3G-1XH-1&_cdi=5798&_user=655052&_pii=0006320788901140&_origin=search&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F1988&_sk=999569996&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlz-zSkWA&md5=115e4f7e5a1bb9106f7fbae6a66c712f&ie=/sdarticle.pdf>.
  3. ^ Sasse, D.B., R.L. Clawson, M.J. Harvey, S.L.Hensley (2007). “Status of Populations of the Endangered Gray Bat in the Western Portion of its Range.” Southeastern Naturaust 6(1): 165-172. <http://content.ebscohost.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pdf19_22/pdf/2007/HQ2/01Mar07/24958962.pdf?T=P&P=AN&K=24958962&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHX8kSeqLc4yNfsOLCmr0mep7ZSsa24Sq%2BWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMOXf8km549%2BB7LH4S7errgAA&D=eih>.
  4. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  5. ^ Brady, J., T. Kunz, M. Tuttle, Ph.D., D. Wilson (July 1982). Gray Bat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Life Service. <http://ntis.library.gatech.edu.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/gtonly/2006-23/PB2006113907.pdf>.
  6. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  7. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  8. ^ Brady, J., T. Kunz, M. Tuttle, Ph.D., D. Wilson (July 1982). Gray Bat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Life Service. <http://ntis.library.gatech.edu.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/gtonly/2006-23/PB2006113907.pdf>.
  9. ^ Best, T.L., B.A.Milam, T.D. Haas, W.S.Cvilikas, L.R. Saidak (1997). “Variation in diet of the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” Journal of Mammalogy 78 (2): 569-584. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=01-28-2016&FMT=7&DID=12724246&RQT=309>.
  10. ^ R.K. LaVal, R.L. Clawson, M.L. LaVal, and W. Claire (1977). “Foraging Behavior and Nocturnal Activity Patterns of Missouri Bats, with Emphais on the Endangered Species Myotis grisescens and Myotis sodalist.” Journal of Mammalogy 58(4): 592-599. <http://www.jstor.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/openurl?volume=58&date=1977&spage=592&issn=00222372&issue=4>.
  11. ^ “Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species. Updated: September 14, 2010. Accessed: April 16, 2010. <http://www.fws.gov/midwest/Endangered/mammals/grbat_fc.html>.
  12. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  13. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  14. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  15. ^ Best, T.L., B.A.Milam, T.D. Haas, W.S.Cvilikas, L.R. Saidak (1997). “Variation in diet of the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” Journal of Mammalogy 78 (2): 569-584. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=01-28-2016&FMT=7&DID=12724246&RQT=309>.
  16. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  17. ^ Brady, J., T. Kunz, M. Tuttle, Ph.D., D. Wilson (July 1982). Gray Bat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Life Service. <http://ntis.library.gatech.edu.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/gtonly/2006-23/PB2006113907.pdf>.
  18. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  19. ^ Brady, J., T. Kunz, M. Tuttle, Ph.D., D. Wilson (July 1982). Gray Bat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Life Service. <http://ntis.library.gatech.edu.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/gtonly/2006-23/PB2006113907.pdf>.
  20. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  21. ^ Best, T.L., B.A.Milam, T.D. Haas, W.S.Cvilikas, L.R. Saidak (1997). “Variation in diet of the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” Journal of Mammalogy 78 (2): 569-584. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=01-28-2016&FMT=7&DID=12724246&RQT=309>.
  22. ^ Sherman, A.R., C.O. Martin (2006). “Rediscovery of the Gray Bat (Myotis Grisescens) in Northeastern Mississippi.” Southwestern Naturalist 51(3): 418-420. <http://www.bioone.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/doi/full/10.1894/0038-4909%282006%2951%5B418%3AROTGBM%5D2.0.CO%3B2>.
  23. ^ Best, T.L., B.A.Milam, T.D. Haas, W.S.Cvilikas, L.R. Saidak (1997). “Variation in diet of the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” Journal of Mammalogy 78 (2): 569-584. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=01-28-2016&FMT=7&DID=12724246&RQT=309>.
  24. ^ Sherman, A.R., C.O. Martin (2006). “Rediscovery of the Gray Bat (Myotis Grisescens) in Northeastern Mississippi.” Southwestern Naturalist 51(3): 418-420. <http://www.bioone.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/doi/full/10.1894/0038-4909%282006%2951%5B418%3AROTGBM%5D2.0.CO%3B2>.
  25. ^ Sasse, D.B., R.L. Clawson, M.J. Harvey, S.L.Hensley (2007). “Status of Populations of the Endangered Gray Bat in the Western Portion of its Range.” Southeastern Naturaust 6(1): 165-172. <http://content.ebscohost.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pdf19_22/pdf/2007/HQ2/01Mar07/24958962.pdf?T=P&P=AN&K=24958962&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHX8kSeqLc4yNfsOLCmr0mep7ZSsa24Sq%2BWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMOXf8km549%2BB7LH4S7errgAA&D=eih>.
  26. ^ V. Brack Jr. and R.K. LaVal (2006). “Diet of the Gray Myotis (Myotis grisescens): variability and consistency, opportunism, and selectivity.” Journal of Mammalogy 87(1): 7-18. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdweb?did=1000187651&Fmt=4&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&>.
  27. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  28. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  29. ^ Sherman, A.R., C.O. Martin (2006). “Rediscovery of the Gray Bat (Myotis Grisescens) in Northeastern Mississippi.” Southwestern Naturalist 51(3): 418-420. <http://www.bioone.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/doi/full/10.1894/0038-4909%282006%2951%5B418%3AROTGBM%5D2.0.CO%3B2>.
  30. ^ Best, T.L., B.A.Milam, T.D. Haas, W.S.Cvilikas, L.R. Saidak (1997). “Variation in diet of the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” Journal of Mammalogy 78 (2): 569-584. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=01-28-2016&FMT=7&DID=12724246&RQT=309>.
  31. ^ V. Brack Jr. and R.K. LaVal (2006). “Diet of the Gray Myotis (Myotis grisescens): variability and consistency, opportunism, and selectivity.” Journal of Mammalogy 87(1): 7-18. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdweb?did=1000187651&Fmt=4&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&>.
  32. ^ R.K. LaVal, R.L. Clawson, M.L. LaVal, and W. Claire (1977). “Foraging Behavior and Nocturnal Activity Patterns of Missouri Bats, with Emphais on the Endangered Species Myotis grisescens and Myotis sodalist.” Journal of Mammalogy 58(4): 592-599. <http://www.jstor.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/openurl?volume=58&date=1977&spage=592&issn=00222372&issue=4>.
  33. ^ R.K. LaVal, R.L. Clawson, M.L. LaVal, and W. Claire (1977). “Foraging Behavior and Nocturnal Activity Patterns of Missouri Bats, with Emphais on the Endangered Species Myotis grisescens and Myotis sodalist.” Journal of Mammalogy 58(4): 592-599. <http://www.jstor.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/openurl?volume=58&date=1977&spage=592&issn=00222372&issue=4>.
  34. ^ Brady, J., T. Kunz, M. Tuttle, Ph.D., D. Wilson (July 1982). Gray Bat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Life Service. <http://ntis.library.gatech.edu.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/gtonly/2006-23/PB2006113907.pdf>.
  35. ^ Best, T.L., B.A.Milam, T.D. Haas, W.S.Cvilikas, L.R. Saidak (1997). “Variation in diet of the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” Journal of Mammalogy 78 (2): 569-584. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=01-28-2016&FMT=7&DID=12724246&RQT=309>.
  36. ^ V. Brack Jr. and R.K. LaVal (2006). “Diet of the Gray Myotis (Myotis grisescens): variability and consistency, opportunism, and selectivity.” Journal of Mammalogy 87(1): 7-18. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdweb?did=1000187651&Fmt=4&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&>.
  37. ^ V. Brack Jr. and R.K. LaVal (2006). “Diet of the Gray Myotis (Myotis grisescens): variability and consistency, opportunism, and selectivity.” Journal of Mammalogy 87(1): 7-18. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdweb?did=1000187651&Fmt=4&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&>.
  38. ^ V. Brack Jr. and R.K. LaVal (2006). “Diet of the Gray Myotis (Myotis grisescens): variability and consistency, opportunism, and selectivity.” Journal of Mammalogy 87(1): 7-18. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdweb?did=1000187651&Fmt=4&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&>.
  39. ^ Best, T.L., B.A.Milam, T.D. Haas, W.S.Cvilikas, L.R. Saidak (1997). “Variation in diet of the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” Journal of Mammalogy 78 (2): 569-584. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=01-28-2016&FMT=7&DID=12724246&RQT=309>.
  40. ^ V. Brack Jr. and R.K. LaVal (2006). “Diet of the Gray Myotis (Myotis grisescens): variability and consistency, opportunism, and selectivity.” Journal of Mammalogy 87(1): 7-18. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdweb?did=1000187651&Fmt=4&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&>.
  41. ^ Best, T.L., B.A.Milam, T.D. Haas, W.S.Cvilikas, L.R. Saidak (1997). “Variation in diet of the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” Journal of Mammalogy 78 (2): 569-584. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=01-28-2016&FMT=7&DID=12724246&RQT=309>.
  42. ^ V. Brack Jr. and R.K. LaVal (2006). “Diet of the Gray Myotis (Myotis grisescens): variability and consistency, opportunism, and selectivity.” Journal of Mammalogy 87(1): 7-18. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdweb?did=1000187651&Fmt=4&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&>.
  43. ^ Best, T.L., B.A.Milam, T.D. Haas, W.S.Cvilikas, L.R. Saidak (1997). “Variation in diet of the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” Journal of Mammalogy 78 (2): 569-584. <http://proquest.umi.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=01-28-2016&FMT=7&DID=12724246&RQT=309>.
  44. ^ Tuttle, M. D. (1976). "Population ecology of the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens): Factors influencing growth and survival or newly volant young." Ecology 57(3): 587-595. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1936443>.
  45. ^ Hamilton, W. J., W. M. Gilbert, F. H. Heppner, and R. Planck (1967). “Starling roost dispersal and a hypothetical mechanism regulating rhythmic animal movement to and from dispersal centers.” Ecology 48: 825-833. <http://www.jstor.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/openurl?volume=48&date=1967&spage=825&issn=00129658&issue=5>.
  46. ^ Brady, J., T. Kunz, M. Tuttle, Ph.D., D. Wilson (July 1982). Gray Bat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Life Service. <http://ntis.library.gatech.edu.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/gtonly/2006-23/PB2006113907.pdf>.
  47. ^ Hamilton, W. J., W. M. Gilbert, F. H. Heppner, and R. Planck (1967). “Starling roost dispersal and a hypothetical mechanism regulating rhythmic animal movement to and from dispersal centers.” Ecology 48: 825-833. <http://www.jstor.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/openurl?volume=48&date=1967&spage=825&issn=00129658&issue=5>.
  48. ^ Tuttle, M. D. (1976). "Population ecology of the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens): Factors influencing growth and survival or newly volant young." Ecology 57(3): 587-595. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1936443>.
  49. ^ Sherman, A.R., C.O. Martin (2006). “Rediscovery of the Gray Bat (Myotis Grisescens) in Northeastern Mississippi.” Southwestern Naturalist 51(3): 418-420. <http://www.bioone.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/doi/full/10.1894/0038-4909%282006%2951%5B418%3AROTGBM%5D2.0.CO%3B2>.
  50. ^ Brady, J., T. Kunz, M. Tuttle, Ph.D., D. Wilson (July 1982). Gray Bat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Life Service. <http://ntis.library.gatech.edu.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/gtonly/2006-23/PB2006113907.pdf>.
  51. ^ Sherman, A.R., C.O. Martin (2006). “Rediscovery of the Gray Bat (Myotis Grisescens) in Northeastern Mississippi.” Southwestern Naturalist 51(3): 418-420. <http://www.bioone.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/doi/full/10.1894/0038-4909%282006%2951%5B418%3AROTGBM%5D2.0.CO%3B2>.
  52. ^ “Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species. Updated: September 14, 2010. Accessed: April 16, 2010. <http://www.fws.gov/midwest/Endangered/mammals/grbat_fc.html>.
  53. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  54. ^ Bagley, F.M., D.R. Clark Jr., W.W. Johnson. (1987). “Northern Alabama Colonies of the Endangered Gray Bat Myotis grisescens: Organochlorine Contamination and Mortality.” Biological Conservation 43: 213-225. <http://www.sciencedirect.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V5X-48XKF3G-1XH-1&_cdi=5798&_user=655052&_pii=0006320788901140&_origin=search&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F1988&_sk=999569996&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlz-zSkWA&md5=115e4f7e5a1bb9106f7fbae6a66c712f&ie=/sdarticle.pdf>.
  55. ^ Bagley, F.M., D.R. Clark Jr., W.W. Johnson. (1987). “Northern Alabama Colonies of the Endangered Gray Bat Myotis grisescens: Organochlorine Contamination and Mortality.” Biological Conservation 43: 213-225. <http://www.sciencedirect.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V5X-48XKF3G-1XH-1&_cdi=5798&_user=655052&_pii=0006320788901140&_origin=search&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F1988&_sk=999569996&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlz-zSkWA&md5=115e4f7e5a1bb9106f7fbae6a66c712f&ie=/sdarticle.pdf>.
  56. ^ Sasse, D.B., R.L. Clawson, M.J. Harvey, S.L.Hensley (2007). “Status of Populations of the Endangered Gray Bat in the Western Portion of its Range.” Southeastern Naturaust 6(1): 165-172. <http://content.ebscohost.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pdf19_22/pdf/2007/HQ2/01Mar07/24958962.pdf?T=P&P=AN&K=24958962&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHX8kSeqLc4yNfsOLCmr0mep7ZSsa24Sq%2BWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMOXf8km549%2BB7LH4S7errgAA&D=eih>.
  57. ^ Sasse, D.B., R.L. Clawson, M.J. Harvey, S.L.Hensley (2007). “Status of Populations of the Endangered Gray Bat in the Western Portion of its Range.” Southeastern Naturaust 6(1): 165-172. <http://content.ebscohost.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pdf19_22/pdf/2007/HQ2/01Mar07/24958962.pdf?T=P&P=AN&K=24958962&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHX8kSeqLc4yNfsOLCmr0mep7ZSsa24Sq%2BWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMOXf8km549%2BB7LH4S7errgAA&D=eih>.
  58. ^ Bagley, F.M., D.R. Clark Jr., W.W. Johnson. (1987). “Northern Alabama Colonies of the Endangered Gray Bat Myotis grisescens: Organochlorine Contamination and Mortality.” Biological Conservation 43: 213-225. <http://www.sciencedirect.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V5X-48XKF3G-1XH-1&_cdi=5798&_user=655052&_pii=0006320788901140&_origin=search&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F1988&_sk=999569996&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlz-zSkWA&md5=115e4f7e5a1bb9106f7fbae6a66c712f&ie=/sdarticle.pdf>.
  59. ^ Tuttle, M. D. (1979). “Status, Causes of Decline, and Management of Endangered Gray Bats”. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 43(1): 1-17. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3800631>.
  60. ^ Tuttle, M. D. (1979). “Status, Causes of Decline, and Management of Endangered Gray Bats”. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 43(1): 1-17. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3800631>.
  61. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  62. ^ Mitchell, W.A. & C.O. Martin (May 2002). “Cave- and Crevice-Dwelling Bats on USACE Projects: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” < http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/si25.pdf>.
  63. ^ Brady, J., T. Kunz, M. Tuttle, Ph.D., D. Wilson (July 1982). Gray Bat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Life Service. <http://ntis.library.gatech.edu.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/gtonly/2006-23/PB2006113907.pdf>.
  64. ^ Sasse, D.B., R.L. Clawson, M.J. Harvey, S.L.Hensley (2007). “Status of Populations of the Endangered Gray Bat in the Western Portion of its Range.” Southeastern Naturaust 6(1): 165-172. <http://content.ebscohost.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pdf19_22/pdf/2007/HQ2/01Mar07/24958962.pdf?T=P&P=AN&K=24958962&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHX8kSeqLc4yNfsOLCmr0mep7ZSsa24Sq%2BWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMOXf8km549%2BB7LH4S7errgAA&D=eih>.
  65. ^ Martin, K. W., D. M. Leslie, et al. (2006). "Impacts of passage manipulation on cave climate: Conservation implications for cave-dwelling bats." Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(1): 137-143. <http://content.ebscohost.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pdf18_21/pdf/2006/WLS/01Mar06/21034851.pdf?T=P&P=AN&K=21034851&S=R&D=eih&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHr7ESeqa44yNfsOLCmr0mepq5Sr6m4SraWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMOXf8km549%2BB7LHjgO3p8gAA>.
  66. ^ Martin, K. W., D. M. Leslie, et al. (2003). "Internal cave gating for protection of colonies of the endangered Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens)." Acta Chiropterologica 5(1): 143-150. <http://www.rsu.edu/faculty/FacultyWebs/KMartin/Martin.pdf>.
  67. ^ Martin, K. W., D. M. Leslie, et al. (2003). "Internal cave gating for protection of colonies of the endangered Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens)." Acta Chiropterologica 5(1): 143-150. <http://www.rsu.edu/faculty/FacultyWebs/KMartin/Martin.pdf>.
  68. ^ Martin, K. W., D. M. Leslie, et al. (2003). "Internal cave gating for protection of colonies of the endangered Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens)." Acta Chiropterologica 5(1): 143-150. <http://www.rsu.edu/faculty/FacultyWebs/KMartin/Martin.pdf>.
  69. ^ Martin, K. W., D. M. Leslie, et al. (2003). "Internal cave gating for protection of colonies of the endangered Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens)." Acta Chiropterologica 5(1): 143-150. <http://www.rsu.edu/faculty/FacultyWebs/KMartin/Martin.pdf>.
  70. ^ White, D. H. & J. T. Seginak. (1987). “Cave Gate Designs for Use in Protecting Endangered Bats.” Wildlife Society Bulletin. 15(3): 445-449. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3782556>.
  71. ^ Brady, J., T. Kunz, M. Tuttle, Ph.D., D. Wilson (July 1982). Gray Bat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Life Service. <http://ntis.library.gatech.edu.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/gtonly/2006-23/PB2006113907.pdf>.
  72. ^ Clark, D.R., R.K. LaVal, D.M.Swineford (1978). “Dieldrin-Induced Mortality in an Endangered Species, the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens).” Science 199(4335): 1357-1359. <http://www.jstor.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/openurl?volume=199&date=1978&spage=1357&issn=00368075&issue=4335>.
  73. ^ Sherman, A.R., C.O. Martin (2006). “Rediscovery of the Gray Bat (Myotis Grisescens) in Northeastern Mississippi.” Southwestern Naturalist 51(3): 418-420. <http://www.bioone.org.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/doi/full/10.1894/0038-4909%282006%2951%5B418%3AROTGBM%5D2.0.CO%3B2>.
  74. ^ Sasse, D.B., R.L. Clawson, M.J. Harvey, S.L.Hensley (2007). “Status of Populations of the Endangered Gray Bat in the Western Portion of its Range.” Southeastern Naturaust 6(1): 165-172. <http://content.ebscohost.com.www.library.gatech.edu:2048/pdf19_22/pdf/2007/HQ2/01Mar07/24958962.pdf?T=P&P=AN&K=24958962&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHX8kSeqLc4yNfsOLCmr0mep7ZSsa24Sq%2BWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMOXf8km549%2BB7LH4S7errgAA&D=eih>.
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: Monotypic (Decher and Choate 1995).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!