Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (2) (learn more)

Overview

Brief Summary

Description

"With its long, luxurious fur, which can range in color from dark brown to pale yellow, and its large, coal-black ears, the long-eared myotis is a striking animal. Long-eared myotis prefer roosting in rock outcroppings and dead trees. They feed on a variety of insects, and are often seen hunting in dense vegetation or over small bodies of water. They seem to prefer moths and beetles, and it appears these bats ""turn off"" their echolocation to listen for insects, which they can pluck from trunks and branches by hovering momentarily. Like many bats, but unlike most other small mammals, they have a long life span. Individuals have been known to live for 22 years, although the average is much shorter."

Links:
Mammal Species of the World
Click here for The American Society of Mammalogists species account
  • Original description: Allen, H., 1864.  Monograph of the bats of North America, p. 48. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection, 7(165):1-85.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution

Source: Smithsonian's North American Mammals

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution

Range Description

Southern British Columbia, Southern Alberta, Southern Saskatchewan (Canada) to New Mexico (USA) and Baja California (Mexico) (Simmons 2005).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Geographic Range

The geographic range of Myotis evotis, or long-eared Myotis, includes much of the western United States from the Pacific Coast to the front range of the Rocky Mountains and western Dakotas. The geographic range reaches up into the lower Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Saskatchewan and Alberta and south into central New Mexico and Arizona. Although widespread, M. evotis is not particularly common throughout the majority of its range.

Two subspecies exist: M. e. evotis of the mountains and high plains of the western U.S. and soutwestern Canada, and M. e. pacificus of coastal regions of the Pacific Northwest.

Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native )

  • Manning, R. 1993. Systematics and evolutionary relationships fo the long-eared myotis, Mytois evotis (Chiroptera: vespertilionidae). The Museum, 37: 1-58.
  • Manning, R., J. Jones. 1989. Myotis evotis. Mammalian Species, 329: 1-5. Accessed March 25, 2004 at http://www.science.smith.edu/departments/Biology/VHAYSSEN/msi/..
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National Distribution

Canada

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Year-round

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Year-round

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: (>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)) Western North America, from central British Columbia, southern Alberta, and southern Saskatchewan south along the Pacific Coast to Baja California, east through Montana and Idaho to the western Dakotas, and from Nevada, Utah, Wyoming and Colorado to New Mexico and Arizona. From near sea level along the Pacific Coast to about 2,830 meters in Wyoming (Manning and Jones 1989).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Morphology

Physical Description

Myotis evotis is dull to pale brown or straw colored with black ears and membranes. The ears, ranging between 19 and 22 mm in length, are the longest of any North American Myotis. The tragus is long and slender. The calcar has little to no keel. The auditory bullae are relatively large compared to other Myotis bats. The dentition is 2/3, 1/1, 3/3, 3/3. Total length, observed in a population of South Dakota bats, ranges from 87 to 100 mm.

Myotis evotis exhibits very little sexual dimorphism, with females being a bit larger than males, though only showing slight differences of length in ear and fifth metatarsal.

There is evidence of geographic variation in size. Specimens of M. evotis from British Columbia have larger skulls than those from Washington; Washington bats are more similar to those found further inland.

Myotis evotis morphologically overlaps with Myotis keenii. The two are sympatric in coastal areas of British Columbia and Washington. The geographic variation of M. evotis has made it difficult to distinguish between the two, and in some collections, identification errors have been made. No external features have been identified that clearly seperate the two species. The skull of M. evotis contains a longer tooth row than that of M. keenii. The distance from the last upper pre-molar to the last upper molar is greater than 4.2 mm. Another Myotis species that is difficult to distiguish is Myotis septentrionalis, commonly known as northern long-eared myotis. Longer tooth row and longer ears help distinguish M. evotis.

Range mass: 5 to 8 g.

Range length: 87 to 100 mm.

Average wingspan: 250 mm.

Sexual Dimorphism: sexes alike; female larger

  • Van Zyll De Jong, C., D. Nagorsen. 1994. A review of the distribution and taxonomy of Myotis keenii and Myotis evotis in British Columbia and the adjacent United States. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 72/6: 1069-1078.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Size

Length: 10 cm

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Size in North America

Length:
Range: 87-100 mm

Weight:
Range: 5-8 g
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution

Source: Smithsonian's North American Mammals

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
Myotis evotis is insectivorous. This bat is found in a wide range of habitats, but is most commonly found in mixed coniferous forests, from humid coastal areas to montane forests. In southern British Columbia, long-eared myotis roost in tree cavities in dense forests. In adapting to forest management in certain areas of British Columbia, they have recently been found to roost in the stumps of clear-cut stands. Long-eared myotis prefer the stumps of ponderosa pine and lodgepole pine in these areas. In the large uninterrupted forests of the Pacific Northwest, M. evotis uses large snags for day roosts. These bats usually prefer snags that reach high into or above the forest canopy. In the badlands of the South Sasketchawan River Valley in Alberta, M. evotis are mostly found roosting in the crevices of sandstone boulders. Other places which function as day roosts are abandoned buildings, cracks in the ground, caves, mines, and loose bark on living and dead trees. (Chruszcz and Barclay, 2002; Chruszcz and Barclay, 2003; Manning and Jones, 1989; Nagorsen and Brigham, 1993; Vonhof and Barclay, 1996; Vonhof and Barclay, 1997; Waldien, Hayes, and Arnett, 2000)

Systems
  • Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat

Myotis evotis is found in a wide range of habitats, but is most commonly found in mixed coniferous forests, from humid coastal areas to montane forests. Elevation ranges from sea level on the Pacific Coast to 2,830 meters in the mountains of Wyoming. The habitat of M. evotis is largely dependent on what the bats use for their day roosts. In southern British Columbia, long-eared myotis roost in tree cavities in dense forests. In adapting to forest management in certain areas of British Columbia, they have recently been found to roost in the stumps of clear-cut stands. Long-eared myotis prefer the stumps of ponderosa pine and lodgepole pine in these areas. In the large uninterrupted forests of the Pacific Northwest, M. evotis uses large snags for day roosts. These bats usually prefer snags that reach high into or above the forest canopy. In the badlands of the South Sasketchawan River Valley in Alberta, M. evotis are mostly found roosting in the crevices of sandstone boulders. Other places which function as day roosts are abandoned buildings, cracks in the ground, caves, mines, and loose bark on living and dead trees.

Range elevation: 0 to 2,830 m.

Habitat Regions: temperate ; terrestrial

Terrestrial Biomes: forest ; rainforest ; scrub forest ; mountains

  • Vonhof, M., R. Barclay. 1997. Use of tree stumps as roosts by the western long-eared bat. Journal of Wildlife Management, 61/3: 974-684.
  • Nagorsen, D., R. Brigham. 1993. Bats of British Columbia. Vancouver: UBC Press.
  • Chruszcz, B., R. Barclay. 2002. Thermoregulatory ecology of a solitary bat, Myotis evotis, roosting in rock crevices. Functional Ecology, 16: 18-26.
  • Chruszcz, B., M. Barclay. 2003. Prolonged foraging bouts of a solitary gleaning/hawking bat, Myotis evotis . Canadian Journal of Zoology, 81: 823-826.
  • Waldien, D., J. Hayes, E. Arnett. 2000. Day-roosts of female long-eared Myotis in Western Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64/3: 785-796.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat Type: Terrestrial

Comments: Mostly forested areas, especially those with broken rock outcrops; also shrubland, over meadows near tall timber, along wooded streams, over reservoirs. Often roosts in buildings, also in hollow trees, mines, caves, fissures, etc. Small maternity colonies of 12-30 individuals have been found in buildings in British Columbia, and a group of adults and young were found in an uninhabited ranch house in Colorado (Barbour and Davis 1969). In northeastern Washington, roosts of reproductive females were in crevices in small basalt rock formations (Rancourt et al. 2005). See Vonhof and Barclay (1996) for information on characterisitcs of roost trees in British Columbia.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Migration

Non-Migrant: No. All populations of this species make significant seasonal migrations.

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.

The winter range is not known. This species is probably migratory (Banfield 1974).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Trophic Strategy

Food Habits

Myotis evotis is insectivorous. These bats emerge to feed approximately one hour after dark. They prey mainly on moths, but their diet also includes beetles, flies, and spiders. They can take prey from the air (hawk) as well as from surfaces (glean). The ability to incorporate both methods of foraging requires a pattern of flight that is slow and methodical, and which requires more energy compared to the flight patterns of faster-flying bats. Because the methodical flight requires more energy, these bats are forced to forage for prolonged periods. The dual method of foraging also allows for foraging and reproducing in less hospitable climates, due to the access to more than one source of prey. Females can breed in high cool climates, where there is decreased availability of flying insects. Myotis evotis can forage for longer periods because it does not rely on a precise heightened insect activity period. Aerially foraging bats focus on peak times of insect abundance, dusk and dawn. Myotis evotis can forage throughout the night, and not rely on peak foraging windows.

Myotis evotis studied in a montane grassland area was found to feed on the following insect families: Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, Neuroptera, Hymenoptera, Hemiptera and Homoptera. Considered temporal opportunists, M. evotis certainly feed to a large extent on moths. Moths are both gleaned from surfaces or taken in the air and both techniques require a unique method of echolocation. Myotis evotis adjusts its echolocation method to fit the acoustical limitation of each foraging situation. For example, when gleaning insects off a surface, the bat has to deal with interference clutter (surfaces reflecting off with more energy than the prey located on that surface). Myotis evotis uses lower amplitude calls when gleaning, and stops calls just before striking, when it actually uses sounds made by the prey to help coordinate its attack. While taking insects from the air, M. evotis uses techniques such as a feeding buzz, used to constantly monitor the environment, even when enacting the final attack on a prey.

Although once considered an active prey specialist, M. evotis is actually a passive prey specialist. The selectivity for moths in the diet of this species is due to a biased sensory system that has especially acute ability to perceive prey-generated sounds. The short duration, broad-band, frequency modulated echolocation calls used by M. evotis are certainly useful for the gleaning of prey off surfaces; however, evidence indicates that they can glean insects from surfaces without use of echolocation. Myotis evotis has extremely sensitive low frequency hearing and can use prey-generated sounds to detect prey without the use of echolocation. This was revealed by an experiment with a hidden moth where echolocation could not confirm the location of prey, yet the bat was still accurate in attacking. The advantages of gleaners using a variety of sensory cues are many. Because tympanate moths have evolved a sensitivity to and avoidance of echolocation calls, M. evotis, which can locate these moths without use of echolocation calls, are more likely to take such moths than are less adept species of bats.

Animal Foods: insects; terrestrial non-insect arthropods

Primary Diet: carnivore (Insectivore )

  • Faure, P., R. Barclay. 1994. Substrate-gleaning versus aerial-hawking- Plasitcity in the foraging and echolocation behavior of the long-eared bat, Myotis evotis . Journal of Comparative Physiology, 174/5: 651-660.
  • Faure, P., J. Fullard, R. Barclay. 1990. The response of tympanate moths to the echolocation calls of a substrate gleaning bat, Myotis evotis . Journal of Comparative Physiology, 166/6: 843-849.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Insectivorous. Forages over water or among trees. Usually feeds by picking prey from surface of foliage, tree trunks, rocks, or ground; may fly slowly around shrub searching for emerging moths or perhaps nonflying prey. See Manning and Jones (1989).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Associations

Ecosystem Roles

As with all small mammals, the amount of energy M. evotis requires to maintain metabolic function results in considerable impact on ecosystems. With M. evotis needing more energy than most, due to its unique energy-intensive flying patterns, it forages for a longer time and is perhaps more successful at taking prey. Wide distribution is testament to the relative success of M. evotis . This species clearly has a large impact on populations of insects upon which it preys.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Predation

In populations of M. evotis living in a Pacific Northwest forest of clear-cut stumps, possible predators include chipmunks (Eutamias amoenus) and bears (Ursus americanus), in addition to other common small mammal predators. To avoid these predators, M. evotis switches roosts frequently. Switching roosts limits the amount of scent that can build up from constant use. In tree bark roosts, the bats often were found face-up at the bottom of the cavity and were well camouflaged.

In British Columbia, a yellow-bellied racer, Coluber mormon, was established as a predator.

Known Predators:

Anti-predator Adaptations: cryptic

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population Biology

Number of Occurrences

Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.

Estimated Number of Occurrences: 81 to >300

Comments: Occurrence information is not available rangewide. Therefore, the number of occurrences was estimated from natural heritage program data estimates and ranks, and from collection site maps. The Idaho Heritage Program has recorded 33 occurrences (Chuck Harris, pers. comm., 1998). In Oregon, the heritage program has recorded 75 occurrences and estimates that about 50 are extant; no recent surveys (Eleanor Gaines, pers. comm., 1998). Arizona has recorded 11 extant occurrences and estimates 21-100 occurrences. More widespread in Arizona than occurrences indicate, 52 localities were mapped by Hoffmeister (1986). Because it is considered common in Arizona and not a heritage program priority, additional occurrences have not been recorded (Sabra Schwartz, pers. comm., 1998). The Nevada Heritage Program has recorded 62+ extant occurrences in good condition (Carrie Carreno, pers. comm., 1998). Nagorsen and Brigham (1993) mapped approximately 49 collection sites in British Columbia. The South Dakota Heritage Program estimates 6-20 occurrences. The only recent South Dakota surveys have been conducted in the Black Hills (Doug Backlund, pers. comm., 1998). Not tracked in Washington, but the heritage program estimates 21-100 to 101+ occurrences (John Fleckenstein, pers. comm., 1998). Several states have SRANKs of S4, indicating many unthreatened occurrences.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Abundance

10,000 to >1,000,000 individuals

Comments: Abundance information is limited to general comments and colony counts. According to Barbour and Davis (1969), never abundant, but regularly distributed. Appears to be widespread and occurs regularly, if not always commonly, in appropriate habitat (Arizona Game and Fish Department 1993). Considered a widespread but relatively uncommon species in Montana and Oregon (Manning and Jones 1989, Eleanor Gaines, pers. comm., 1998). Tuttle and Taylor (1994) stated that mine colonies are usually in the dozens and mines can be used year round. According to the Arizona Game and Fish Department (1997), females form small maternity colonies in the summer. Roosting and maternity colonies can range from 1 to 30 or 5 to 30 individuals, respectively (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 1997, Nagorsen and Brigham 1993).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

Widespread, not uncommon, but little is known about habits. It has been found foraging with M. VOLANS, Eptesicus fuscus, Lasionycteris noctivagans, and L. CINEREUS.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Behavior

Communication and Perception

Echolocation is essential to M. evotis, as it is through this means that these bats are able to capture their prey. Echolocation can be used in different ways when capturing prey. Changing calls or ceasing calls are both options for capturing prey in different situations. Although echolocation is the main means of capturing prey when “hawking” insects from the air, M. evotis will cease calling and use prey-generated sounds to guide the attack. This ability has many ramifications in feeding behavior, habitat range, and prey selection for M. evotis. Tympanate moths are a primary food source, and these foraging tactics make M. evotis all the more effective at capturing prey in the air or off a surface.

Other forms of communication or uses for echolocation for M. evotis are not completely known. Other echolocating bats have been found to actually use echolocation as a means of communication with each other. Myotis lucifugus was observed to use echolocation in identifying roosts, mating sites, hibernation sites and feeding areas. Other bats have been found to react aggressively to echolocation calls of conspecifics thus maintaining spacing between individuals. Echolocation can also facilitate mother-young recognition.

Although reports in the literature are absent, we may infer that mothers and their young use some tactile communication. It is also likely that this type of communication occurs between mates. Chemical communication has not been reported for these animals.

Communication Channels: visual ; tactile ; acoustic

Perception Channels: visual ; acoustic ; ultrasound ; echolocation

  • Faure, P., R. Barclay. 1992. The sensory basis of prey detection by the long-eared bat, Myotis evotis, and the consequences for prey selection. Animal Behavior, 44/1: 31-39.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Cyclicity

Comments: Reportedly emerges late in evening to feed, though other authors report earlier emergence (see Manning and Jones 1989).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life Expectancy

Lifespan/Longevity

The lifespan of these animals has been reported as a maximum of 22 years in the wild. It is unlikely that most individuals live that long.

Range lifespan

Status: wild:
22 (high) years.

Average lifespan

Sex: male

Status: wild:
2.2 years.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

Maximum longevity: 22 years (wild)
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Joao Pedro de Magalhaes

Source: AnAge

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

Reproduction

Mating systems for M. evotis are relatively unkown. Although some similarities to other Myotis species can be inferred, actual data for M. evotis do not exist.

Most species of the genus for which there are data appear to be polygynandrous. Myotis myotis mating involves the females from different colonies traveling several miles to male roost sites. Little is observed in male behavior in attracting females. Reproduction in Myotis lucifugus involves copulation and insemination prior to hibernation. The sperm are then stored in the uterus until spring.

Mating System: polygynandrous (promiscuous)

Records of M. evotis reproduction are very incomplete. Most data are either based upon anecdotal accounts or museum specimens. The young are born in late spring/early summer. Lactating females have been collected in July and August. Myotis evotis reproduces once per year, and females may form maternity colonies of 5 to 30 individuals in the summer (colonies may contain a few males), or they can remain solitary.

The young are born naked with sharp milk teeth. Size of the neonates ranges around 7 to 8 cm, with a weight of around 1 to 1.5 grams.

A study of reproducing females in Alberta produced some interesting data on roost differences between pregnant and lactating females. Pregnant females roost in horizontal rock crevices, which are closer to the surface, warm rapidly, and have a higher mean daytime temperature. Pregnant females can maintain a higher body temperature at a lower cost to them by roosting in a warmer place. The horizontal surface rock crevices cool very quickly, however the bats spend these cool hours foraging. When they return to the cold roost, they drop into torpor until passively warmed by the ambient temperature, thus saving more energy for use towards fetal development.

Females who had given birth to young used deeper vertical rock crevices, which maintain a higher overall temperature. Juveniles that are left in the roost while the mother forages can not effectively maintain their high body temperatures. Vertical rock crevices fluctuate less in temperature, keeping the juveniles warmer and more stable.

Breeding interval: Myotis evotis breeds once per year.

Breeding season: Mating occurs in autumn or early winter.

Range number of offspring: 1 to 1.

Range gestation period: 40 to 60 days.

Key Reproductive Features: iteroparous ; seasonal breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); fertilization ; viviparous ; sperm-storing

Average birth mass: 1.22 g.

Average number of offspring: 1.

Parental investment is not well known for M. evotis. Lactating females choose a roost that is suitable for the young, which can not yet thermoregulate. Maternity roosts are often made up of several to several dozen individuals. The roost differs from that chosen while pregnant. Length of lactation and parental care has not been reported. The role of males in parental care has not been reported, but, as in most bats, it is likely that parental care is provided solely by the female, who nurses, protects, and grooms the altricial offspring.

Parental Investment: no parental involvement; altricial ; pre-fertilization (Protecting: Female); pre-hatching/birth (Provisioning: Female, Protecting: Female); pre-weaning/fledging (Provisioning: Female, Protecting: Female); pre-independence (Provisioning: Female)

  • Nagorsen, D., R. Brigham. 1993. Bats of British Columbia. Vancouver: UBC Press.
  • Chruszcz, B., R. Barclay. 2002. Thermoregulatory ecology of a solitary bat, Myotis evotis, roosting in rock crevices. Functional Ecology, 16: 18-26.
  • Manning, R. 1993. Systematics and evolutionary relationships fo the long-eared myotis, Mytois evotis (Chiroptera: vespertilionidae). The Museum, 37: 1-58.
  • Manning, R., J. Jones. 1989. Myotis evotis. Mammalian Species, 329: 1-5. Accessed March 25, 2004 at http://www.science.smith.edu/departments/Biology/VHAYSSEN/msi/..
  • Waldien, D., J. Hayes, E. Arnett. 2000. Day-roosts of female long-eared Myotis in Western Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64/3: 785-796.
  • Zahn, A., B. Dippel. 1997. Male roosting habits and mating behaviour of Myotis myotis . Journal of Zoology, 243: 659-674.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Litter size is 1. Births have been recorded in mid-July in western Washington. Young and lactating females were recorded in late July in New Mexico. Female and newborn young were recorded in late June in California. Male young-of-year about adult size were observed in early August in South Dakota.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Myotis evotis

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 0
Species: 3
Species With Barcodes: 1

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2008

Assessor/s
Arroyo-Cabrales, J. & Ticul Alvarez Castaneda, S.

Reviewer/s
Medellín, R. (Chiroptera Red List Authority) & Schipper, J. (Global Mammal Assessment Team)

Contributor/s

Justification
This species is listed as Least Concern in because of its wide distribution, presumed common population, occurrence in a number of protected areas, and because it is unlikely to be declining at nearly the rate required to qualify for listing in a threatened category.

History
  • 1996
    Lower Risk/least concern
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation Status

Myotis evotis is a previous candidate 2 species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. It has no formal federal status, but is recognized as state sensitive in many areas of the western U.S.

Temperate North American bats are now threatened by a fungal disease called “white-nose syndrome.” This disease has devastated eastern North American bat populations at hibernation sites since 2007. The fungus, Geomyces destructans, grows best in cold, humid conditions that are typical of many bat hibernacula. The fungus grows on, and in some cases invades, the bodies of hibernating bats and seems to result in disturbance from hibernation, causing a debilitating loss of important metabolic resources and mass deaths. Mortality rates at some hibernation sites have been as high as 90%. While there are currently no reports of Myotis evotis mortalities as a result of white-nose syndrome, the disease continues to expand its range in North America.

US Federal List: no special status

CITES: no special status

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: least concern

  • Cryan, P. 2010. "White-nose syndrome threatens the survival of hibernating bats in North America" (On-line). U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center. Accessed September 16, 2010 at http://www.fort.usgs.gov/WNS/.
  • National Park Service, Wildlife Health Center, 2010. "White-nose syndrome" (On-line). National Park Service, Wildlife Health. Accessed September 16, 2010 at http://www.nature.nps.gov/biology/wildlifehealth/White_Nose_Syndrome.cfm.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National NatureServe Conservation Status

Canada

Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure

Reasons: Widespread distribution in western North America; over 100 occurrences rangewide; apparently occurs regularly in low numbers across range; through much of range considered moderately to not very threatened.

Other Considerations: What constitutes an occurrence may vary among natural heritage programs. Some programs may consider roost sites as an occurrence and other may use any collection record. Standardized EO Specifications need to be developed.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
Elevation ranges from sea level on the Pacific Coast to 2,830 meters in the mountains of Wyoming.
M. evotis is either solitary or roosts in colonies of up to 30 individuals. Both sexes use a variety of roost sites. In the Pacific Northwest, the variety of female roost sites exceeds that of any other bats in that area. In forest populations, these bats usually roost in large snags in canopy gaps, or else in stumps in clear-cut areas. These bats are thought to migrate short distances between summer and winter ranges, although winter ranges for long-eared myotis are unreported. (Manning and Jones, 1989; Vonhof and Barclay, 1996; Waldien, Hayes, and Arnett, 2000).

Population Trend
Stable
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Short Term Trend: Relatively stable (=10% change)

Comments: Specific trend information is not available. However, South Dakota Heritage Program staff stated that the trend in that state is unknown but probably stable (Doug Backlund, pers. comm., 1998). The Oregon, Arizona, and Nevada heritage programs reported populations as stable (Eleanor Gaines, Sabra Schwartz, Carrie Carreno, pers. comm., 1998). Appears to be stable in Washington and probably rangewide (John Fleckenstein, pers. comm., 1998).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Threats

Major Threats
Habitat loss. May be affected by the closure of abandoned mines without surveys, recreational caving, some forest management practices and activities that impact cliff faces or rock outcrops.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Degree of Threat: BC

Comments: Maternity colonies, hibernacula, and roosts are vulnerable to disturbance and destruction (Doug Backlund, pers. comm., 1998, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 1997). Special precautions should be taken when mine and cave surveys are conducted during breeding periods and winter hibernation. Disturbance of breeding colonies can cause young to lose their grasp and fall to their death. Disturbance during hibernation can cause bats to use up stored fat reserves and starve to death.
Cutting of large snags is of particular concern in Arizona. Roosts under exfoliating bark may be relatively short-lived resources (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 1997). May be affected by the closure of abandoned (unsurveyed) mines, recreational caving, some forestry management practices, and activities (such as highway construction, water impoundments, blasting of cliffs for avalanche control) that impact cliff faces or rock outcrops (Western Bat Working Group 1998). May also be threatened by regional insecticide applications (John Fleckenstein, pers. comm., 1998). According to heritage program staff, not very threatened in Nevada and Washington and moderately threatened in South Dakota and Oregon (Carrie Carreno, John Fleckenstein, Doug Backlund, and Eleanor Gaines, pers. comm., 1998).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
The species is included inside the Mexican regulation for species conservation NOM-59-SEMARNAT-2001 (Arroyo-Cabrales pers. comm.). It occurs in several protected areas.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Protection: Unknown whether any occurrences are appropriately protected and managed

Comments: Unknown.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems

Benefits

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

M. evotis is a known carrier of rabies.

Negative Impacts: injures humans (bites or stings, causes disease in humans , carries human disease)

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

As an insectivore, M. evotis has some effect on insect pest control.

Positive Impacts: controls pest population

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Long-eared Myotis

The Long-eared Myotis (Myotis evotis) is a species of vesper bat. It can be found in western Canada, the western United States, and Baja California in Mexico.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b Arroyo-Cabrales, J. & Ticul Alvarez Castaneda, S. (2008). "Myotis evotis". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2. International Union for Conservation of Nature. http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/14157. Retrieved 08 February 2010. 
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Miller's Myotis

Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: van Zyll de Jong and Nagorsen (1994) provisionally interpreted the very close morphologically similarity between M. keenii and M. evotis in British Columbia and the adjacent northwestern United States as overlapping intraspecific variation rather than intergradation between the taxa; they noted the need for molecular data to resolve the situation.

A phylogenetic study based on mtDNA data, sequence divergence between M. evotis and the leibii group was small (2.9%) and within the intraspecific range. Further sampling of M. evotis is necessary to establish the level of divergence between M. evotis, as well as other long-eared Myotis, and the leibii group (Rodriguez and Ammerman 2004).

M. milleri in Baja California is treated as a distinct species in Wilson and Reeder (1993) but is included in M. evotis by Wilson and Reeder (2005).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!