Overview

Comprehensive Description

Characteristics

Aenictus is characterized by the following derived traits (Bolton 2003):
  • Spiracle of abdominal segment III (postpetiole) at or behind midlength of tergite
  • Abdominal segment IV (first gastral) constricted behind the presclerites, forming a neck
  • Pygidium very small, reduced to a narrow U-shaped sclerite
  • Postpygidial gland large
  • Male without presclerites on abdominal segment IV
  • Male with abdominal segment VI enlarged
  • Male tergite VII mostly overlapped and concealed by tergite VI so that only a small portion of VII is visible, internalized portion of tergite VII desclerotized

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Diagnostic Description

Aenictus Shuckard, 1840: 266.

 

Typhlatta Smith, 1857: 79 (synonym of Aenictus by Forel, 1890: ciii; removed from synonymy as subgenus of Aenictus by Wheeler,1930: 198; synonym of Aenictus by Wilson, 1964: 444).

 

Diagnosis. Workers of Aenictus may be separated from other Australian ants by their moderately small size (less than about 4 mm), lack of eyes, long slender bodies and long legs. They are superficially similar to some myrmicines but differ in lacking the frontal lobes and in having the antennal sockets completely visible when viewed from the front (myrmicines have frontal lobes that are expanded towards the sides of the head and partly cover the antennal sockets). Some of the smaller, paler species are also similar to Leptanilla workers, but differ in being larger and only ten segments in the antennae rather than 12, and lacking a flexible promesonotal suture.

 

Males of Aenictus can be separated from those of other Australian ants by the exposed antennal sockets and lack of a postpetiole (the gaster is smooth and lacks a constriction between the first and second segments).

 

Key to Species of Australian Aenictus based on workers

 

1. A ridge (parafrontal ridge) present on the front of the head starting between the antennal and mandibular insertions and extending posteriorly; head capsule varying from smooth posteriorly and weakly punctate between the frontal carinae and above the mandibular insertions to completely punctuate ...................... 2

 

- Area between antennal and mandibular insertions smooth or at most slightly angular but never ridged (parafrontal ridge absent); head capsule entirely smooth ........................................................................... 4

 

2. Pronotum with large smooth areas dorsally and laterally, other areas micro-reticulate............. philiporum

 

- Pronotum entirely sculptured with dense micro-reticulations ....................................................................3

 

3. Scape relatively long (SI> 107)...................................................................................................... nesiotis

 

Scape relatively short (SI <103)........................................................................................................ aratus

 

4. Head with large pale patches near the posterolateral corners; subpetiolar process generally absent but sometimes present as a slight carina................................................................................................. diclops

 

Head essentially uniform in colour; subpetiolar process large and rectangular .........................................5

 

5. Scape relatively long (SI> 89)........................................................................................................ prolixus

 

Scape relatively short (SI <91) .................................................................................................................. 6

 

6. Body larger (HW> 0.62mm); sculpturing on pronotum extending posteriorly onto the main pronotal body .......................................................................................................................................................... acerbus

 

- Body smaller (HW <0.62mm); sculpturing on pronotum limited to the anterior sections around the collar, the main body of pronotum smooth................................................................................................. turneri

License not applicable

Shattuck, S. O.

Source: Plazi.org

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Barcode

Locations of barcode samples

Collection Sites: world map showing specimen collection locations for Aenictus
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Statistics of barcoding coverage

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) Stats
                                                             
Specimen Records:10
Specimens with Sequences:10
Specimens with Barcodes:10
Public Records:9
Species:7
Species With Barcodes:7
  
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Barcode data

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Aenictus

The army ant genus Aenictus is an enigmatic group known from Africa, tropical Asia, and Queensland. There are some 100 species presently recognized, though many other names are applied at the rank of subspecies. This group has in the past been classified as the tribe Aenictini in the former subfamily "Dorylinae", or even as its own subfamily Aenictinae.

Very little is known about the biology and behavior of these ants aside from the recognition that they do appear to be "army ants" in the broad sense (foraging via "raids", and no permanent nest site), and that they are closely related to the genus Dorylus, these two genera comprising the sister taxon to the New World Ecitonini.

Contents

Species

A. powersi worker
A. laeviceps queen and worker
A. congolensis queen and worker

References

Further reading

  • Wheeler, William M. (1930): Philippine ants of the genus Aenictus with descriptions of the females of two species. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 38: 193-212. PDF
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!