Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (2) (learn more)
Overview
Brief Summary
Description
Links:
Mammal Species of the World
Click here for The American Society of Mammalogists species account
- Original description: Baird, S.F., 1857 [1858]. Mammals. In Reports of explorations and surveys, to ascertain the most practicable and economical route for a railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, p. 334. Vol. 8, Pt. 1. Mammals. Beverly Tucker Printer, Washington, D.C., 8(1):1-757 + 43 plates.
Trusted
Distribution
Range Description
Trusted
Geographic Range
This species is limited to the high mountain valleys and plateaus in the southern Rocky Mountains, and it is found at elevations of 1,830 to 3,660 m (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Its distribution centers around the Four Corners region where the states of Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona meet (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). The northernmost population of C. gunnisoni is found in South Park, CO, while the southernmost population resides near the Mogollon Mountains in southwestern New Mexico (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973).
Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native )
Trusted
National Distribution
United States
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
Trusted
Global Range: (250-20,000 square km (about 100-8000 square miles)) Range extends from central Colorado to central Arizona, including a small portion of southeastern Utah and much of the northwestern half of New Mexico. The montane and prairie portions of the range are separated by mountain ranges that almost completely limit prairie dog movement between them (USFWS 2008). See Goodwin (1995) for a review of the biogeographic history of prairie dogs.
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Physical Description
Gunnison's prairie dog is a stout-bodied creature whose total length varies from 309 to 373 mm (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Males are larger than females on average, and subspecies differ slightly in color and size (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). The dorsal pelage of these animals is yellowish buff intermixed with blackish hairs, while the top of the head, sides of the cheeks, and eyebrows are noticeably darker than the other portions of the pelage (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Two annual molts occur in these animals-- one in the spring and another in the fall (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). The spring molt begins anteriorly and proceeds posteriorly until the tail hair is renewed (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). In contrast, the winter coat renewal, which is usually complete by mid-September, begins in the posterior region of the body and progresses anteriorly (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Cynomys gunnisoni has a much shorter tail - 39 to 68 mm - than other prairie dogs, and it is uniquely colored (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). The proximal half of the tail is the same color as the dorsal pelage; however, the distal half is grayish with grayish-white hairs appearing at the terminus (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). This character is very useful in differentiating C. gunnisoni from other white-tailed species, which possess pure white hairs on the distal half of their tails (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973).
It should be noted that one of the most interesting physical characteristics of these animals is the placement of their eyes (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Their eyes, positioned on the sides of the head, appear to be adapted for detecting movement over a wide arc, and this allows these prairie dogs to detect predators with greater success (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973).
Average mass: 900 g.
Trusted
Size
Size in North America
Length:
Average: 335 mm males; 325 mm females
Range: 317-390 mm males; 309-338 mm females
Weight:
Average: 816 g males; 644 g females
Range: 460-1,300 g males; 465-750 g females
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Habitat and Ecology
It reproduces slowly, relative to other rodents (Hoogland 2001). Only one litter is produced per year, and only 24% of males copulate as yearlings (Hoogland 2001). All females copulate as yearlings (Hoogland 2001). Seasonal timing of onset of reproduction varies somewhat with latitude, elevation, and year. Gestation lasts about 30 days. Litter size averages about six, but for those females that are successful in weaning offspring, only 3.77 young per female emerge from nursery burrow (Hoogland 2001). The probability of weaning a litter each year is 82% (Hoogland 2001). Parturition occurs in April or early May in northern Arizona (Shalaway and Slobodchikoff 1988). Young stay underground for about one month.
Colonial groups are organized into territories that generally contain one adult male, one or more adult females, non-breeding yearlings, and young of the year; overlap between areas of high use is low between members of neighbouring territories (Travis and Slobodchikoff 1993).
Survivorship is low: only about 50% of females that emerged from burrows as juveniles are alive at the end of their first year, and less than 15% are alive at the end of their second year (Hoogland 2001). Major mortality factors are disease, predation, and disturbance by man. Colonies suffer drastic population declines and are often extirpated during outbreaks of flea-borne sylvatic plague (Rayner 1985).
Feeds on grasses, forbs, sedges, and shrubs. Insects are of minor importance to its diet. Not known to store food in its burrow. It has periods of inactivity during winter, which may last several months; may hibernate in some parts of range.
Systems
- Terrestrial
Trusted
Habitat
Compared to the habitats of other prairie dog species, the habitat of C. gunnisoni varies greatly with respect to topography and vegetation (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). In addition, the burrow systems of C. gunnisoni are more similar to those of ground squirrels than they are to other species of prairie dogs (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Entrances are usually located on slopes or small hummocks rather than in depressions, which protects the burrows from flooding (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). The older burrow systems are deeper, have more entrances at the surface, and more bifurcations below (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Usually, each burrow contains a single nest composed of dried vegetation, and there is no evidence that C. gunnisoni uses its burrow for food storage (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973).
Terrestrial Biomes: savanna or grassland ; forest
Trusted
Comments: High mountain valleys and plateaus at elevations of 1,830-3,660 meters; open or slightly brushy country, scattered junipers and pines. Mainly in areas with high abundance of native plants in northern Arizona (Slobodchikoff et al. 1989). Burrows usually on slopes or in hummocks.
Trusted
Migration
Non-Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species do not make significant seasonal migrations. Juvenile dispersal is not considered a migration.
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.
Trusted
Trophic Strategy
Food Habits
The masticatory muscles among members of the genus Cynomys are, proportionally, the stoutest and most highly developed among the Nearctic Sciuridae, and the crown height of their cheekteeth equals or exceeds that of all other Nearctic Sciuridae (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). These characteristics reflect the adaptation of Gunnison's prairie dogs to an almost exclusively graminivorous diet (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). In addition, analyses of the stomach contents of Gunnison's prairie dogs have shown that these creatures also eat forbs, sedges, and shrubs (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973).
Trusted
Comments: Diet includes on grasses, forbs, sedges, and shrubs. Insects are of minor importance. This species is not known to store food in its burrow. In Arizona, it feeds mainly on dead grass and seeds in spring and fall, on growing vegetation in summer (Shalaway and Slobodchikoff 1988).
Trusted
Population Biology
Number of Occurrences
Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.
Estimated Number of Occurrences: 81 to >300
Trusted
Global Abundance
100,000 to >1,000,000 individuals
Comments: Population size is very large. In Arizona, each of two colonies studied by Travis et al. (1997) was estimated to include several thousand individuals.
Trusted
General Ecology
Colonies often are smaller than those of other species; may consist of fewer than 50-100 individuals. Colonial groups are organized into territories that generally contain one adult male, one or more adult females, nonbreeding yearlings, and young of the year; overlap between areas of high use is low between members of neighboring territories (Travis and Slobodchikoff, 1993, Can. J. Zool. 71:1186-1192). Hoogland (1999) also described social organization.
Survivorship is low: only about 50 percent of females that emerged from burrows as juveniles are alive at the end of their first year, and less than 15 percent are alive at the end of their second year (Hoogland 2001).
Major mortality factors are disease, predation, and humans. Colonies suffer drastic population declines and are often extirpated during outbreaks of flea-borne sylvatic plague (Rayner 1985; see also papers by Barnes, Cully, and Fitzgerald in Oldemeyer et al. 1993). This species and Cynomys ludovicianus occur at densities up to 10 times higher and are more social than Cynomys leucurus, and thus they are much more susceptible to the fast spread of plague; in fact, C. gunnisoni is perhaps the most susceptible (Cully and Williams 2001).
This prairie dog is an important prey species in fall for migrating raptors in northern New Mexico (Cully 1988).
Trusted
Life History and Behavior
Cyclicity
Comments: Individuals exhibit periods of inactivity during winter, which may last several months; hibernation may occurs in some parts of the range. In northern Arizona, activity occurs mostly March-October (Shalaway and Slobodchikoff 1988). During spring and summer, most activity occurs in early morning and late afternoon (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973).
Trusted
Life Expectancy
Lifespan, longevity, and ageing
Trusted
Reproduction
Reproduction
The onset of reproduction is somewhat variable and dependent on latitiude, elevation, and seasonal variation (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Females are capable of reproducing at 1 year of age and bear a single litter per year (average size is 4.78 young) after a 30 day gestation period (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Previous studies have shown that parturition occurs between the months of April and early May (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Young remain underground for about a month after birth (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Consequently, little is known about growth and development during this period (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). During the lactation period newborns nurse from one of five pairs of mammae-- two pectoral and three inguinal (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). After the young begin emerging from the nesting burrow, nursing soon ends, and the offspring must become independent and feed on surrounding vegetation (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). After all the offspring are weaned, the mother leaves them in the nesting burrow and establishes herself in another burrow (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Soon thereafter, the young leave the nesting burrow and disperse to other unoccupied burrows (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Males of this species have a baculum which resembles that of ground squirrels (genus Spermophilus), and therefore, males are often described as spermophile-like (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973).
Average gestation period: 30 days.
Average number of offspring: 4.4.
Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)
Sex: female: 365 days.
Trusted
Only one litter is produced per year, and only about one-fourth of males copulate as yearlings (Hoogland 2001). All females copulate as yearlings (Hoogland 2001). Seasonal timing of onset of reproduction varies somewhat with latitude, elevation, and year. Gestation lasts about 30 days. Litter size averages about 6, but for those females that are successful in weaning offspring, an average of only 3.8 young per female emerge from the nursery burrow (Hoogland 2001). The probability of weaning a litter each year is 82 percent (Hoogland 2001). Parturition occurs in April or early May in northern Arizona (Shalaway and Slobodchikoff 1988). Young stay underground for about 1 month.
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
IUCN Red List Assessment
Red List Category
Red List Criteria
Version
Year Assessed
Assessor/s
Reviewer/s
Justification
History
- 1996Lower Risk/least concern(Baillie and Groombridge 1996)
Trusted
Conservation Status
Most deaths of Gunnison's prairie dogs can be attributed to predators, disease, and disturbance by man (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Predators include such animals as badgers, coyotes, weasels, and several species of raptors, and an occasional pup may be lost to the rattlesnakes that often inhabit the burrow systems of C. gunnisoni (Cully 1991 and Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Concerning disease, C. gunnisoni carries several types of ectoparasites such as fleas and ticks, and these fleas can carry Yersinia pestis - the causative agent of plague - to which both men and Gunnison's prairie dogs are susceptible (Cully 1991 and Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Disturbance by man is without a doubt the greatest danger to C. gunnisoni (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Extermination programs implemented at the turn of the century have greatly reduced the numbers and the range of Gunnison's prairie dog via such methods as drowning or treatments with carbon bisulfide, strychnine, or fluoride compound 1080 (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Fortunately, however, these animals have been given protection in some areas such as the Blue River Reservoir in Gunnison County, CO (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973).
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: least concern
Trusted
National NatureServe Conservation Status
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure
Trusted
NatureServe Conservation Status
Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure
Intrinsic Vulnerability: Moderately vulnerable
Comments: Reproductive rate is low, relative to other rodents, and survivorship is low (Hoogland 2001), but population size of individual colonies nevertheless may increase rapidly from year to year (Travis et al. 1995, Cully 1997).
Environmental Specificity: Moderate. Generalist or community with some key requirements scarce.
Other Considerations: The Great Plains ecosystem evolved with bison, prairie dogs, and fire as major forces/processes; bison and fire are effectively gone, and the prairie dog is vastly reduced. Litke the Black-tailed Pairie Dog, Gunnison's Prairie Dog is a keystone species upon which many other prairie species depend, but now "may be as functionally extinct as the bison" (M. Gilpin, pers. comm. in Miller and Cully 2001). Black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes, G1) is almost completely dependent on prairie dogs for food. Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus, G2), Burrowing Owl (Speotyto cunicularia, G4), Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis, G4), and swift fox (Vulpes velox, G3) are among those animals that are found in greatest numbers on prairie dog towns.
Trusted
Status: Candidate
Date Listed:
Lead Region: Mountain-Prairie Region (Region 6)
Where Listed: central and south-central Colorado, north-central New Mexico
For most current information and documents related to the conservation status and management of Cynomys gunnisoni, see its USFWS Species Profile
Trusted
Trends
Population
It has been considerably reduced in range extent in parts of Colorado and New Mexico. Subspecies C. g. gunnisoni is extirpated over much of its former range (Fitzgerald et al. 1994). Ongoing studies in Arizona indicate it may be extirpated in about 70% of its former range (B. Van Pelt pers. comm.).
Population Trend
Trusted
Global Short Term Trend: Relatively stable to decline of 30%
Comments: Relative to the large decline from historical levels, populations may have been more stable in some states in recent decades (USFWS 2006).
Global Long Term Trend: Decline of 30-70%
Comments: Populations in all states within the range have declined significantly compared to historical levels (USFWS 2006).
Between 1916 and 1961, range-wide historical habitat occupied by the Gunnison's prairie dog declined from approximately 97,000 square kilometers to approximately 4,064 square kilometers (USFWS 2008). Between 1916 and the present, habitat occupied by Gunnison's prairie dog throughout its range declined from approximately 97,000 square kilometers to 1,360-2,000 square kilometers (USFWS 2008). This represents a range-wide decline of greater than 95 percent.
Recent data indicate that approximately 3.6 percent of potential Gunnison's prairie dog habitat is occupied in the montane portion of the range, as compared to 18.3 percent occupancy in the prairie portion of the range (USFWS 2008).
In Arizona, Wagner et al. (2006) found that most Gunnison's prairie dog colonies identified as active in initial surveys (1987, 1990-1994, 1998) did not persist to the time of recent surveys in 2000 and 2001; just 82 (30%) of the 270 colonies identified in the initial surveys were still active.
Trusted
Threats
Threats
USFWS (2006) found that a petition to list this species as threatened or endangered did not present substantial scientific information indicating that a listing may be warranted under any pertinent threat factors. USFWS acknowledged that sylvatic plague has been and continues to be the primary mortality factor for Gunnison's prairie dog, especially at specific sites, but concluded that the impact that this disease has had on the overall status of the species is unclear.
This species reproduces slowly relative to other rodents, and survivorship is low (Hoogland 2001).
Trusted
Degree of Threat: B : Moderately threatened throughout its range, communities provide natural resources that when exploited alter the composition and structure of the community over the long-term, but are apparently recoverable
Comments: USFWS (2008) concluded that "of all the factors affecting Gunnison's prairie dog populations, sylvatic plague is the most significant." Sylvatic plague is an often-fatal bacterial disease that is generally transmitted among rodents by fleas. It is not native to North America and was first detected in Gunnison's prairie dog in New Mexico in 1938 (Link 1955). Plague epizootics can severely reduce or extirpate populations within a short time frame (3 to 10 years) (Lechleitner et al. 1962, 1968; Fitzgerald and Lechleitner 1974; Rayor 1985; Cully et al. 1997; USFWS 2008). Major populations are separated from each other by mountain ranges and large rivers, which preclude repopulation after plague epizootics (USFWS 2008). Habitat loss and degradation, shooting, and inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms, were not regarded by USFWS (2008) as significant threats. Although poisoning of Gunnison's prairie dogs and the effects of climate change in the montane portion of the range were regarded as issues important to monitor, USFWS (2008) concluded that aside from plague "no other natural or manmade factors are a significant threat to this species, at this time, throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
Plague is primarily a bacterial disease of rodents, often spread through flea bites or contact with the tissues of infected individuals. It has a long history in Asia and has been present in the United States since 1900.
"Flea-born plague occurs in regular outbreaks and causes population declines and extirpations. Because the disease has only been present within the species' range for approximately 70 years, there has been very little time for resistance to evolve. It is believed that prairie dogs are highly susceptible to plague because of high population densities, abundant flea vectors, and uniformly low resistance. Partial or complete recovery following population reductions due to plague have been reported for both white-tailed and black-tailed prairie dogs, but little to no recovery to previous levels has been noted in montane Gunnison's prairie dog colony die-offs, even after long periods of time."
"The landscape in the montane portion of the Gunnison's prairie dog range is characterized by fewer, smaller, and more isolated colonies with minimal to no metapopulation structure. These factors make the prairie dogs in this habitat highly susceptible to plague-related declines. Gunnison's prairie dogs also commonly forage outside of their home territory which may contribute to the communicability of plague.
"Gunnison's prairie dog populations in the moister montane areas have been widely and severely affected by plague. This may be due in part to higher levels of spring moisture which increases flea numbers, and in turn, plague outbreaks. Although documented population declines due to plague also occur in the drier prairie portions of the Gunnison's prairie dog range, evidence shows that many of these populations recover more rapidly from plague outbreaks probably due to the availability of nearby colonizers.
"After assessing the best available science, the Service has concluded that the Gunnison's prairie dog is not in danger of extinction or likely to become endangered throughout all of its range; however, within the montane habitat in central and south-central Colorado and north-central New Mexico, the species is likely to become threatened or endangered within the foreseeable future due to plague. Based on the continued presence of plague and its effects and the average to maximum life span of Gunnison's prairie dogs, the foreseeable future has been determined to be the year 2042."
Trusted
Management
Conservation Actions
More information is needed on the impacts of disease, specifically sylvatic plague, and on population status and trends (USFWS 2006).
Trusted
Restoration Potential: Davidson et al. (1999) discussed a reintroduction onto a former colony in New Mexico.
Management Requirements: Benefits from management of grasslands to favor native species (Slobodchikoff et al. 1989).
See Oldemeyer et al. (1994) for information on the management of prairie dog complexes for the reintroduction of black-footed ferret.
Management Research Needs: See Miller et al. (in Oldemeyer et al. 1993) for a list of questions for management and research, related to ferret reintroduction, in priority order in each category of disease, habitat management, population dynamics, and public relations.
Biological Research Needs: More information is needed on the impacts of disease, specifically sylvatic plague, and on population status and trends (USFWS 2006).
More information is needed on the impacts of fragmentation and isolation with regard to persistence of prairie dog populations and on the magnitude of the potential threat posed by increasing oil and gas development (USFWS 2008).
Trusted
Global Protection: Unknown whether any occurrences are appropriately protected and managed
Comments: USFWS (2008) determined that approximately 22 percent of the potential habitat occurs on private lands, 12 percent on State lands, 17 percent on Federal lands, and 49 percent on Tribal lands/Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA).
Needs: Protect existing colonies from poisoning. Protect several acres/colony.
Trusted
Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems
Benefits
Economic Importance for Humans: Negative
Cynomys gunnisoni is considered an agricultural pest and economically deleterious because of its tendency to burrow in lands used for farming (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973).
Trusted
Economic Importance for Humans: Positive
Although C. gunnisoni is primarily a graminivorous species, it has been known to consume small quantities of insects such as grasshoppers and beetles (Pizzimenti and Hoffmann 1973). Therefore, it may play a role in the maintenance of insect populations in certain farming communities and help reduce insect-related crop damage.
Trusted
Risks
Species Impact: Reintroduction of prairie dogs had no observable influence on the resident small mammal and plant connunities in the short-term, but their influences may be more evident over the long-term (Davidson et al. 1999).
Trusted
Wikipedia
Gunnison's prairie dog
Gunnison's prairie dog (Cynomys gunnisoni) is one of five species of the prairie dog. This species belongs to the squirrel family of rodents, and are predominantly related to the North American and Eurasian ground squirrels. Gunnison’s prairie dogs are primarily distributed in the Four Corners region of the United States.
Contents |
Physical description
Gunnison’s prairie dogs are 12 to 14 inches (30 to 37 centimeters) in length and have tails that measure 1.25 to 2.25 inches (3 to 6 centimeters). This species weighs from 1.5 to 2.5 lbs (0.5 to 1 kg). On average, males are larger in size than females. Gunnison's prairie dogs have 22 teeth, and five 5 pairs of mammary glands.[2]
The Gunnison’s prairie dog, C. gunnisoni, is the only prairie dog species that has 40 chromosomes. The other four species, black-tailed, white-tailed, Utah, and Mexican prairie dogs, have 50 chromosomes.[3] Their coats are yellow-toned buff merged with black-colored hairs. The upper head, sides of the cheek, and eyebrows are distinctly darker than the rest of the body. Their tails are mostly white with grayish-white ends and the tips are light gray.
The Gunnison’s prairie dogs go through two yearly periodic moults during spring and fall. In spring, the shedding begins from the head to the rear tail. The process is reversed in the winter, it starts from the tail and proceeds to head.[4]
A distinguishing physical trait of the prairie dog is the placement of the eyes. They are situated on the sides of their heads, giving them a wide peripheral range of sight. This allows them to spot predators more easily and react as quickly as possible.[5]
Nutrition
The Gunnison’s prairie dog typically feeds during the day, when they are most active.[6] Their diet usually consists grasses, herbs, and leaves.[7] During the spring, they feed on newly grown shrubs. In the summer, they mainly consume seeds. Food is scare in winter and fall. During these months, they feed on stems and roots, and stored food accumulated in the warmer months. While most prairie dogs are typically herbivores, some eat insects.[4]
Habitat
Three-quarters of the population of Gunnison's prairie dogs are located in Arizona and New Mexico.[6] They can be found in high desert, grasslands, meadows, hillsides, broad alluvial valleys and floodplains. They are often found in shrubs, such as rabbitbrush, sagebrush, and saltbrush. This species of prairie dogs resides in habitats ranging from 6,000-10,000 feet in altitude, although they have been recorded at altitudes as high as 12,000 feet.[8]
The sagebrush ecosystem is dependent on these animals. As a result of the Gunnison’s prairie dogs burrowing, the soil is freshened, organic matter is added, and increased water penetration is able to occur. Their burrowing also creates habitats and exposes food sources for other creatures.
Social structure
Gunnison’s prairie dogs live in colonies of up to several hundred individuals. Each colony is subdivided into smaller territories occupied by communal groups or solitary individuals.[9] These communities of prairie dogs vary from two to 19 individuals and may be composed of a single male/single female, single male/multiple females, or multiple males/multiple females.[9] Arrangement of the communities or social groups may be linked with the distribution of food resources. The territories inhabited by the Gunnison’s prairie dog are defended by social groups, and violent behavior is common toward other animals who are not members. These prairie dogs often feed in feebly defended peripheral sections of territories that belong to other groups, but when members from different groups meet in these common feeding areas, conflicts can arise, with one prairie dog chasing the other back to its territory.[10]
Behavior
All prairie dogs, including the Gunnison’s prairie dog are diurnal.[6] This means they exert the most activity in the early morning and late afternoon. During warm weather, the highest activity levels occur at about 9 a.m., and from 2 p.m. to about an hour before the sun sets. When the temperature starts to cool, they become more active during the day. When it snows or rains, the prairie dogs will stay underground.
Their above-ground activities include making social contact, being aware of their surroundings and predators, grooming, burrowing, etc. Their main activity above ground is feeding. Although Gunnison’s prairie dogs are considered to be less social than black-tailed prairie dogs, they are considered to be more social than the white-tailed prairie dogs. Studies have shown female Gunnison's prairie dogs are far more likely to engage in friendly social contact with other prairie dogs, and males are more likely to create conflict.
With exception of two species, the black-tailed and Mexican, prairie dogs hibernate. During the winter, the Gunnison's prairie dog stays underground for long periods of time without food or water, using physiological adaptations to control their metabolism. Their bodies also rely on their stored body fat during hibernation. After hibernation, they become active again around March or April. This species is most active during the months of April through October.
Communication
The Gunnison’s prairie dog communicates through forms of physical contact, such as cuddling and kissing, and through vocalization, such as a warning bark. Their vocal communication is the foundation to their survival and structure of their community. Their system of vocal communication is complex and may be one of the most advanced forms of communication of all natural animal languages.[3] Con Slobodchikoff, a Northern Arizona University biology professor, has been a researching the behavior of prairie dogs for 20 years, and states prairie dogs “have one of the most advanced forms of natural language known to science.”
The bark is a combination of one or two high-pitched audible syllables, with the second syllable lower and deeper.[11] Prairie dogs have a unique sound to identify each of various predators.[12] They also have different barks for warning and “all-clear” signals. Researchers and experts have been able to classify up to 11 distinct warning calls the prairie dog uses to communicate.[13] Also, females with offspring are more likely to give off a warning bark than males.
The warning signal is their primary source of survival because it alerts the other prairie dogs to nearby danger. It can last for up to 30 minutes and can be heard nearly a mile away. As danger approaches, the intensity of the signal increases, and it ends after the prairie dog has entered its safe haven.
Studies have also shown prairie dogs can distinguish between the different colors of clothing people wear, and between people expressing threatening and nonthreatening behavior.
Breeding and life span
The Gunnison’s prairie dog mating season begins in mid-March and lasts until mid-May. A female is able to reproduce at the age of one year. When food availability is scarce during the mating season, they may wait another year before breeding. Females engage in sexual intercourse for a single day during the mating season, and can mate with approximately five males, depending on the population density of their habitat. Gestation lasts, on average, 30 days.[9] Females produce one litter per year of four to five pups.[14]
Once the pups are born, the mother Gunnison’s prairie dog nurses the pups for about 30 to 40 days. During this time, the young pups remain safely in the nesting burrow located underground. Towards the end of lactation, the young are able to come out above ground; they must learn how to separate themselves from their mothers and survive on their own. As soon as the mother is done caring her young, she relocates herself to another burrow, leaving her now-independent young behind. Not too long after, they scatter to other vacant burrows.[4] A high percentage of female Gunnison’s prairie dogs settle close to their birth territories for their entire lifetimes, whereas a significantly low percentage of the males stay close to their birth territories for longer than one year.[9]
The life span of a Gunnison’s prairie dog is generally three to five years in the wild, but they can live up to eight years of age.
The population of the Gunnison’s prairie dog is declining drastically due to three major factors: shootings, plague cycles, and poisoning.[9] Many concerned groups of people are requesting that the Gunnison’s Prairie Dog be listed under the federal Endangered Species Act.[15]
Predators and disease
Predators include badgers, wolves, coyotes, bobcats, black-footed ferrets, weasels, golden eagles and large hawks.[6] Humans also affect prairie dog populations; for example, some ranchers implement poisoning programs to eliminate them.
Plague (disease), caused by Yersinia pestis and transmitted via fleas, can wipe out a numerous individuals of the prairie dog populations.
Notes
- ^ Linzey, A. V. & NatureServe (Mabee, T., Cannings, S. & Hammerson, G.) (2008). Cynomys gunnisoni. In: IUCN 2008. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 6 January 2009.
- ^ "Gunnison's prairie dog". Sevilleta LTER. http://www.sevilleta.unm.edu/data/species/mammal/sevilleta/profile/gunnison-prairie-dog.html. Retrieved 2008-11-15.
- ^ a b "Gunnison's Prairie Dog". Prairie Dog Coalition. http://www.prairiedogcoalition.org/pd-gunnisons-prairie-dog.php. Retrieved 2008-11-21.
- ^ a b c "Cynomys gunnisoni". Animal Diversity Web. http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Cynomys_gunnisoni.html. Retrieved 2008-11-17.
- ^ "Gunnison's Prairie Dog". U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/mammals/GunnisonPrairieDog. Retrieved 2008-11-15.
- ^ a b c d "Prairie Dogs". Encyclopædia Britannica. http://search.eb.com/eb/article-9061181. Retrieved 2008-11-17.
- ^ "Wildlife Gunnison's Prairie Dog". National Diversity Information Source. http://www.ndis.nrel.colostate.edu/wildlifespx.asp?SpCode=050127. Retrieved 2008-11-21.
- ^ "Gunnison's prairie dog". Sagebushsea. http://www.sagebrushsea.org/sp_gn_prairie_dog.htm. Retrieved 2008-11-18.
- ^ a b c d e "Utah Gunnison's Prairie Dog and White-Tailed Prairie Dog Conservation Plan". Prairie Dog Coalition. http://wildlife.utah.gov/furbearer/pdf/prairie_dog_plan.pdf. Retrieved 2008-11-23.
- ^ "Gunnison's prairie dog Cynomys gunnisoni". Native Ecosystems. http://www.nativeecosystems.org/species/gunnisons-prairie-dog/index_html. Retrieved 2008-11-19.[dead link]
- ^ "Prairie Dog Language?". John Pratt. http://www.johnpratt.com/items/docs/lds/meridian/2005/prairie_dog.html. Retrieved 2008-11-21.
- ^ "Prairie Dogs". DesertUSA. http://www.desertusa.com/dec96/du_pdogs.html. Retrieved 2008-11-21.
- ^ "About Prairie Dogs". City of Boulder, Colorado. http://www.bouldercolorado.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1689&Itemid=1607. Retrieved 2008-11-14.
- ^ "Gunnison's and White-tailed Prairie Dogs in Trouble Says National Wildlife Federation Report". Environmental Defense Fund. http://www.edf.org/pressrelease.cfm?contentID=2475. Retrieved 2008-11-21.
- ^ "Protection sought for Gunnison's prairie dog". Animal Defense League of Arizona. http://www.adlaz.org/gunnisonrelease.html. Retrieved 2008-11-13.
References
- "Data : Species : Mammal : Gunnison Prairie Dog - Cynomys gunnisoni". Seviletta LTER Data. 15 November 2008; link updated 25 April 2010 <http://sev.lternet.edu/projects.php?rtheme=&mentor=Davidson%2C+Ana&keyword=&submit1=Search>.
- “Field Guide to North American Mammals.” National Audubon Society. 6th ed. 2001
- "GUNNISON'S PRAIRIE DOG Cynomis Gunnisoni". 15 November 2008 <http://www.sagebrushsea.org/sp_gn_prairie_dog.htm>.
- "Gunnison's Prairie Dog Cynomys gunnisoni ". Center for Native Ecosystems. 15 November 2008 <http://www.nativeecosystems.org/species/gunnisons-prairie-dog/index_html/>.
- "Gunnison's Prairie Dog Cynomys gunnisoni ". Colorado Division of Wildlife. 15 November 2008 <http://ndis.nrel.colostate.edu/wildlifespx.asp?SpCode=050127>.
- "Gunnison's Prairie Dog (Cynomys gunnisoni)". Prairie Dog Coalition. 15 November 2008 <http://www.prairiedogcoalition.org/pd-gunnisons-prairie-dog.php>.
- "GUNNISON'S PRAIRIE DOG". U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 15 November 2008 <http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/mammals/GunnisonPrairieDog/>.
- Landesman, Nathan. "Cynomys gunnisoni Gunnison's prairie dog". University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. 15 November 2008 <http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Cynomys_gunnisoni.html>.
- Lupis, S. G., K. D. Bunnell, T. A. Black, and T. A. Messmer. 2007. Utah Gunnison’s prairie dog and white-tailed prairie dog conservation plan: Draft #5. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Salt Lake City, Utah. 15 November 2008 <http://wildlife.utah.gov/furbearer/pdf/prairie_dog_plan.pdf>
- "Prairie dog." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 15 November 2008 <http://search.eb.com/eb/article-9061181>.
- “Prairie Dogs”. DesertUSA. 17 November 2008 <http://www.desertusa.com/dec96/du_pdogs.html>.
- "PROTECTION SOUGHT FOR GUNNISON'S PRAIRIE DOG". Animal Defense League of Arizona. 15 November 2008 <http://www.adlaz.org/gunnisonrelease.html>.
- Taylor, Mark. "BLM and DOW Drag Feet on Gunnison Prairie Dog Relocations ". RMAD Press Release. 15 November 2008 <http://www.rmad.org/gunnisonpdog.html>.
- "Vlaamse Prairiehonden Vereniging" < http://www.prairiehond.eu>.
Unreviewed
Names and Taxonomy
Taxonomy
Comments: Researchers have come to different conclusions regarding the taxonomic status of the two nominal subspecies (gunnisoni and zuniensis). Pizzimenti (1975) examined variation in cranial and external characteristics and suggested that C. cunnisoni begregarded as a montypic species. Hoffmeister (1986) questioned Pizzimenti's analyses and conclusions, and he stated that "it appears there are size and proportional differences between prairie dogs that can be called C. g. gunnisoni and C. g. zuniensis, but the area of intergradation between the two may need redefining." Hoffmeister (1986) also stated that "some workers may prefer to regarded this subspecies [C. g. zuniensis] as indistinguishable from C. g. gunnisoni." Unpublished research by Hafner (cited by USFWS 2008) indicates that the distribution of mtDNA haplotype lineages supports past geographic isolation, followed by limited mixing in regions coincident with the recognized borders of the two purported subspecies. USFWS (2008) avoided the subspecies issue and instead distinguished "montane" and "prairie" populations whose distributions are essentially the same as those of the subspecies gunnisoni and zuniensis, respectively.
Based on information from two colonies 13 kilometers apart in Arizona, Travis et al. (1997) determined that this species exhibits low within-population genetic diversity and significant differentiation between colonies.
Trusted
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!



