Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (2) (learn more)
Overview
Brief Summary
Description
Links:
Mammal Species of the World
Click here for The American Society of Mammalogists species account
- Original description: Peale, T.R., 1848. U.S. exploring expeditions 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842 under the command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., Mammalogy and Ornithology, p. 53. Asherman and Co., Philadelphia, 8:1-338.
Trusted
Distribution
Range Description
Trusted
Geographic Range
This pocket mouse can be found in the Great Basin from South British Columbia (Canada), south to eastern California and east to southeast Wyoming and northwest Arizona (Wilson 1993).
Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native )
Trusted
National Distribution
Canada
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
United States
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
Trusted
Global Range: Great Basin, from south-central British Columbia southward to southern California, northern Arizona, and southwestern Wyoming.
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Physical Description
Head and body length: 60-90 mm Tail length: 45-100 mm
The upper parts of its body are a pinkish buff color, which is thinly to heavily overlaid with a blackish color, while the underparts vary from white to buffy. The soft coat of this mouse has no bristles. One molt takes place in late summer. The soles of its hind feet are hairy, and the tail is long and bicolored (Hall 1981).
Its hind limbs are about the same length of its forelimbs, and the Great Basin pocket mouse moves about on all four legs. While the hind legs provide support, the forefeet dig with claws through sand to find seeds (Nowak 1991). These seeds are then placed in fur-lined external cheek pouches, which open alongside its mouth (Britannica 1997).
Average mass: 20.1 g.
Average basal metabolic rate: 0.16 W.
Trusted
Size
Size in North America
Average: 174 mm males; 171 mm females
Range: 160-181 mm males; 160-190 mm females
Weight:
Average: 25.4 g males; 20.5 g females
Range: 21.5-31 g males; 16.5-28.5 g females
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Habitat and Ecology
Primarily solitary. Home range has been estimated at up to 0.40 ha. Primarily a seed eater, but also feeds on insects and some green vegetation in spring/summer. Seeds stored in underground storage chambers. It may forage in grain fields but no significant damage has been noted (Bureau of Land Management, no date). Little above-ground activity occurs in November-March; during this time, long periods of torpor are presumed to alternate with arousal and eating periods. Also may become torpid in summer. It is active within an hour after sunset.
Systems
- Terrestrial
Trusted
Habitat
The Great Basin pocket mouse can be found in shrub/grassland communities of sagebrush, shadscale, greasewood, mountain mahogany, and bitterbrush. Habitats dominated with shrub are useful in vegetative cover, while also providing better and more diverse food resources (Bushey 1987).
Terrestrial Biomes: desert or dune ; savanna or grassland
Trusted
Comments: Arid, sandy short-grass steppes; brushland covered with sagebrush, bitterbrush, and rabbit brush; pinyon-juniper woodland. Usually found in habitats with light-textured, deep soils; also among rocks. Sleeps and rears young in underground burrows.
Trusted
Migration
Non-Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species do not make significant seasonal migrations. Juvenile dispersal is not considered a migration.
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.
Trusted
Trophic Strategy
Food Habits
Its diet consists mostly of seeds of forbs, grasses and shrubs. Along with green vegetation, insects are eaten particularly when they are abundant (Grzimek 1990).
Trusted
Comments: Primarily a seed eater, but also feeds on insects and some green vegetation in spring/summer. Seeds stored in underground storage chambers. May forage in grain fields but no significant damage has been noted (Bureau of Land Management, no date).
Trusted
General Ecology
Primarily solitary. Home range has been estimated at up to 0.40 ha; varies with several factors. Population density may reach 80/ha or more in years with abundant precipitation.
Trusted
Life History and Behavior
Cyclicity
Comments: Little above-ground activity occurs in November-March; during this time, long periods of torpor are presumed to alternate with arousal and eating periods. Also may become torpid in summer. Active within an hour after sunset.
Trusted
Life Expectancy
Lifespan/Longevity
Average lifespan
Status: captivity: 5.8 years.
Trusted
Lifespan, longevity, and ageing
Trusted
Reproduction
Reproduction
From about late April to early August, males are in breeding condition, while females show the first sign of estrus in April. Early June is probably when breeding occurs at its peak. Pregnancies then occur from May to July. Gestation lasts 21 to 25 days. When there is an abundance of food, females have an average of two litters per year. Some have even been found to have three litters. Otherwise, an average of 1.1 litters is produced. Litters vary from three to eight mice. Juveniles born early in the season are able to breed themselves by late summer (Nowak 1991).
Average birth mass: 1.5 g.
Average gestation period: 24 days.
Average number of offspring: 4.8.
Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)
Sex: female: 100 days.
Trusted
Reproductively active spring-summer. Gestation probably lasts about 21-28 days; 0-3 litters/year, varies with precipitation. Number of fetuses/female ranges from 2 to 8 (average about 5). Young are weaned in about 3 weeks.
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Molecular Biology
Barcode data: Perognathus parvus
There is 1 barcode sequence available from BOLD and GenBank. Below is the sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species. See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen. Other sequences that do not yet meet barcode criteria may also be available.
-- end --
Download FASTA File
Trusted
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Perognathus parvus
Public Records: 1
Species: 3
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
IUCN Red List Assessment
Red List Category
Red List Criteria
Version
Year Assessed
Assessor/s
Reviewer/s
Justification
History
- 1996Lower Risk/least concern
Trusted
Conservation Status
Great Basin pocket mice are common and not endangered (Grzimek 1990). Because they are able to retreat to underground burrows, these mice are not in much immediate danger from fires in sagebrush and bunch grass habitats. However, fires reduce food resources and vegetative cover, making the mice more susceptible to predators (Bushey 1987).
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: least concern
Trusted
National NatureServe Conservation Status
Canada
Rounded National Status Rank: N2 - Imperiled
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure
Trusted
Trends
Population
Population Trend
Trusted
Threats
Threats
Trusted
Management
Conservation Actions
Trusted
Wikipedia
Great Basin Pocket Mouse
The Great Basin Pocket Mouse (Perognathus parvus) is a species of rodent in the Heteromyidae family.[2][3][4][5] It is found in British Columbia in Canada and the western United States.[1]
Contents |
Taxonomy
There are several subspecies of P. parvus. Sulentich[6] and Genoways and Brown[2] classify the yellow-eared pocket mouse as P. p. xanthonus Grinell, a subspecies of the Great pocket mouse. However, Jones and others[4] classify the yellow-eared pocket mouse as a distinct species, P. xanthonotus (Grinnell).
Distribution
The Great Basin Pocket Mouse occurs in the Columbia River Basin and the Great Basin and adjacent lands. It is distributed from south-central British Columbia and eastern Washington south to southeastern California, Nevada and northern Arizona, and east to southeastern Montana and Wyoming.[7][8] Distribution of subspecies is:[2][3]
- Perognathus parvus bullatus: (Durrant and Lee) – central and east-central Utah
- P. p. clarus (Goldman) – extreme southwestern Montana; southeastern Idaho; extreme north-central Utah; extreme southwestern Wyoming
- P. p. columbianus (Merriam) – central and southern Washington
- P. p. idahoensis (Goldman) – south-central Idaho
- P. p. laingi (Anderson) – south-central British Columbia
- P. p. lordi (Gray) – extreme south-central Bristish Columbia; central and eastern Washington; northwestern Idaho
- P. p. mollipilosus (Coues)[2][3] – south-central Oregon; north-central and northeastern California
- P. p. olivaceus (Merriam) – most of Nevada; eastern California; extreme southeastern Oregon; southern Idaho; western Colorado; the most widely distributed subspecies
- P. p. parvus (Peale)[3] – southeastern Washington; central and eastern Oregon
- P. p. trumbullensis (Benson) – southern Colorado; northern Arizona
- P. p. yakimensis (Broadbooks)[2][3] – south-central Washington
The yellow-eared pocket mouse occurs on the eastern slope of the Tehachapi Mountains in Kern County, California.[3][8] It is not certain whether its distribution is disjunct or joins that of P. parvus olivaceus.[2]
Plant communities
The Great Basin Pocket Mouse occupies steppes and open, arid shrublands and woodlands. It most commonly occurs in sagebrush (Artemisia spp.), shadscale (Atriplex confertifolia), and other desert shrublands, and in pinyon-juniper (Pinus-Juniperus spp.) woodland. On the eastern slope of the Cascade Range and the Sierra Nevada, it occurs in ponderosa pine (P. ponderosa) and Jeffrey pine (P. jefferyi) woodlands.[2] Riparian zones may have larger concentrations of Great Basin Pocket Mice than upland areas.[9][10]
Timing of major life events
In late fall and winter, Great Basin Pocket Mice remain in their burrows in a state of torpor.[11][12] They emerge from their burrows and mate in early spring.[8][11][12] Males emerge slightly before females. In south-central Washington, Great Basin Pocket Mice emerged from March to April.[13] Prebreeding enlargement of ovaries and testes begins in winter in the complete darkness of the burrow. Following emergence from the burrow, the lengthening photoperiod of spring apparently triggers final enlargement and development of gonads for breeding.[14] Access to succulent green vegetation in spring may enhance reproductive success of females. Captive female Great Basin Pocket Mice from eastern Washington fed lettuce and seeds had significantly larger ovaries than control females fed only seeds. Great Basin Pocket Mice remain reproductively active through summer. Females produce one or two litters per year. Most first litters are delivered in May and second litters in August.[8][15] Reports of average litter size have ranged from 3.9 in south-central Washington[15] to 5.6 in Nevada.[16] First-litter subadults first leave the natal burrow in early summer; subadults from the second litter first emerge in fall. In a 2-year study in south-central Washington, first-litter subadults first emerged in June, and second-litter subadults first emerged in October (1974) and November (1975).[13]
As it signals the beginning of the breeding season, photoperiod may often signal its end. In the laboratory, an artificial short day-long night summer photoperiod caused gonadal shrinkage in Great Basin Pocket Mice. A favorable diet apparently overrides this effect, however, extending the breeding season. In nature, Great Basin Pocket Mice remain reproductively active through fall in years of favorable plant production. Juveniles typically breed in their second year, but first-litter individuals may first reach breeding condition before winter when plant productivity is high.[14]
Great Basin Pocket Mice occupy open, arid terrain. They seek friable soil of a variety of textures for burrowing.[17][18][19]
Home ranges of 7,060 to 9,630 square feet (656–895 sq m) have been reported for Great Basin Pocket Mice in British Columbia. Males may have larger home ranges than females. Average home ranges reported from south-central Washington are 23,030 square feet (2,140 sq m) and 33,640 square feet (3,125 sq m) for adult males and 15,564 square feet (1,446 sq m) for adult females.[15] In big sagebrush habitat on the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon, home ranges of adult males were significantly greater (p < 0.001) than home ranges of females. Reproductively active adult males had significantly (p < 0.05) larger home ranges than adult males with unenlarged testes. In black greasewood (Sarcobatus vermiculatus) habitat, however, there were no significant differences between male and female home ranges or between home ranges of reproductive and nonreproductive adult males.[20]
Cover requirements
Great Basin Pocket Mice are nocturnal and use burrows for daytime cover. They also use burrows during periods of winter and summer torpor.[8][15][21][22] The winter burrow consists of a 3- to 6-foot- (0.9–1.8 m-) deep tunnel leading to a chamber lined with dry vegetation. The summer burrow is shallow. Except for mothers with young, the burrow is occupied by a single individual.[8]
Food habits
Great Basin Pocket Mice consume primarily seeds, but eat some green vegetation.[11][12] Prior to production of seeds, they also consume insects.[23] Great Basin Pocket Mice do not use free water,[24] they metabolize water from food.[8] Pocket Mice (Perognathus spp.) and other heteromyids are scatterhoarders, caching seeds in shallow depressions and covering the seeds with soil. The seeds are primarily those of grass species, and some preferred forb species. Indian ricegrass (Oryzopsis hymenoides),[25] cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), Russian-thistle (Salsola kali),[15] antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata), pigweed (Amaranthus spp.), and mustard (Brassica spp.)[8] seeds are important Great Basin Pocket Mouse food items. In productive years, cheatgrass seeds formed a major portion of the diet of Great Basin Pocket Mice in southeastern Washington.[15]
Seeds of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) were not used by Great Basin pocket mice in Lassen County, California, and areas with heavy medusahead invasion were avoided.[25]
Estimated seed intake of a Great Basin Pocket Mouse is from 4% to 10% of total body weight daily. Assuming a wholly cheatgrass diet, an individual requires 870 to 1,000 seeds per day in spring and summer, and about 750 seeds per day in fall. Estimated daily maintenance energy requirement ranges from a winter low of 2.4 kilocalories (males) and 2.6 kilocalories (females) to a high of 7.0 kilocalories (males) and 6.6 kilocalories (females) in spring. A total of about 1.8 to 2.1 ounces (50–60 g) of seed must be cached to meet the winter energy requirement.[15] To conserve energy when food is scarce in summer, Great Basin pocket mice often enter a state of torpor that lasts a few hours.[13][15]
Great Basin Pocket Mice are fairly successful at finding buried seed caches, even those buried by other individuals. In a laboratory experiment, Great Basin Pocket Mice found Indian ricegrass seeds 17.5% of the time when researchers cached seeds 1.3 centimeters below ground; 42.5% of the time when seeds were cached 0.6 centimeter below ground; and 100% of the time when seeds were scattered on the soil surface.[26]
Predators
Owls (Tytonidae and Strigidae),[8] including Northern Saw-whet Owls (Aegolius acadicus)[9] and Burrowing Owls (Speotyto cunicularia)[27] hawks (Accipitridae),[8] coyotes (Canis latrans),[28][29] foxes (Vulpes and Urocyon spp.), weasels and skunks (Mustelidae), and snakes[8] prey on Great Basin Pocket Mice.
References
This article incorporates public domain material from the United States Department of Agriculture document "Perognathus parvus".
- ^ a b c Linzey, A.V. & NatureServe (Hammerson, G.) (2008). Perognathus parvus. In: IUCN 2008. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 22 January 2009. Database entry includes a brief justification of why this species is of least concern
- ^ a b c d e f g Williams, Daniel F.; Genoways, Hugh H.; Braun, Janet K. 1993. Taxonomy. In: Genoways, Hugh H.; Brown, James H., eds. Biology of the Heteromyidae. Special Publication No. 10. The American Society of Mammalogists: 38–196
- ^ a b c d e f Hall, E. Raymond. 1981. The mammals of North America. 2nd ed. Volume I. New York: John Wiley & Sons
- ^ a b Jones, J. Knox, Jr.; Hoffmann, Robert S.; Rice, Dale W.; 1992. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers No. 146. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University, The Museum.
- ^ Hafner, John C.; Hafner, Mark S. 1983. Evolutionary relationships of Heteromyid rodents. Great Basin Naturalist. 7: 3–29
- ^ Sulentich, J. M. 1983. The systematics and evolution of the Perognathus parvus species group in southern California. Long Beach, CA: California State University.
- ^ Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Whitaker, John O., Jr. 1980. National Audubon Society field guide to North American mammals. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc
- ^ a b Cannings, Richard J. 1987. The breeding biology of northern saw-whet owls in southern British Columbia. In: Nero, Robert W.; Clark, Richard J.; Knapton, Richard J.; Hamre, R. H., eds. Biology and conservation of northern forest owls: Symposium proceedings; 1987 February 3–7; Winnipeg, MB. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-142. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 193–198.
- ^ Clary, Warren P.; Medin, Dean E. 1992. Vegetation, breeding bird, and small mammal biomass in two high-elevation sagebrush riparian habitats. In: Clary, Warren P.; McArthur, E. Durant; Bedunah, Don; Wambolt, Carl L., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on ecology and management of riparian shrub communities; 1991 May 29–31; Sun Valley, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-289. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 100–110
- ^ a b c O'Farrell, Michael J. 1978. Home range dynamics of rodents in a sagebrush community. Journal of Mammalogy. 59(4): 657–668
- ^ a b c O'Farrell, Thomas P.; Olson, Richard J.; Gilbert, Richard O.; Hedlund, John D. 1975. A population of Great Basin Pocket Mice, Perognathus parvus, in the shrub-steppe of south-central Washington. Ecological Monographs. 45: 1–28
- ^ a b c Hedlund, J. D.; Rogers, L. E. 1980. Great Basin Pocket Mice (Perognathus parvus) in the vicinity of radioactive waste management areas. Northwest Science. 54(2): 153–159
- ^ a b Kenagy, G. J.; Barnes, B. M. (1984). "Environmental and endogenous control of reproductive function in the Great Basin pocket mouse Perognathus parvus". Biology of Reproduction 31 (4): 637–645. doi:10.1095/biolreprod31.4.637. PMID 6509135. http://users.iab.uaf.edu/~brian_barnes/publications/1984kenagy_barnes.pdf.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Schreiber, R. Kent. 1978. Bioengergetics of the Great Basin Pocket Mouse, Perognathus parvus. Acta Theriologica. 23(32): 469–487
- ^ Hall, E. Raymond. 1946. Mammals of Nevada. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
- ^ Black, Hal L.; Frischknecht, Neil C. 1971. Relative abundance of mice on seeded sagebrush-grass range in relation to grazing. Res. Note INT-147. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station
- ^ Hedlund, J. D.; Rickard, W. H. 1981. Wildfire and the short-term response of small mammals inhabiting a sagebrush-bunchgrass community. Murrelet. 62: 10–14
- ^ Verner, Jared; Boss, Allan S., tech. coords. 1980. California wildlife and their habitats: western Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-37. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station
- ^ Feldhamer, George A. 1979. Home range relationships of three rodent species in southeast Oregon. Murrelet. 60: 50–57
- ^ Maser, Chris; Thomas, Jack Ward; Anderson, Ralph G. 1984. Wildlife habitats in managed rangelands--the Great Basin of southeastern Oregon: The relat. of terrestrial vertebrates to plant communities: Part 2. Appendices. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-172. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station; Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management
- ^ McAdoo, J. Kent; Klebenow, Donald A. 1979. Native faunal relationships in sagebrush ecosystems. In: The sagebrush ecosystem: a symposium: Proceedings; 1978 April; Logan, UT. Logan, UT: Utah State University, College of Natural Resources: 50–61
- ^ Dunigan, P. F. X., Jr.; Lei, W.; Rickard, W. H. 1980. Pocket mouse population response to winter precipitation and drought. Northwest Science. 54(4): 289–295
- ^ Price, M. V.; Brown, J. H. 1983. Patterns of morphology and resource use in North American desert rodent communities. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs. 7: 117–134
- ^ a b Longland, William S. 1994. Seed use by desert granivores. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., compilers. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18–22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 233–237
- ^ Johnson, Terrell K.; Jorgensen, Clive D. 1981. Ability of desert rodents to find buried seeds. Journal of Range Management. 34(4): 312–314
- ^ Henny, Charles J.; Blus, Lawrence J. 1981. Artificial burrows provide new insight into burrowing owl nesting biology. Raptor Research. 15(3): 82–85.
- ^ Edwards, Loren Lee. 1975. Home range of the coyote in southern Idaho. Pocatello, ID: Idaho State University, Thesis
- ^ Springer, Joseph Tucker. 1982. Movement patterns of coyotes in south central Washington. Journal of Wildlife Management. 46(1): 191–200
Trusted
Names and Taxonomy
Taxonomy
Comments: Perognathus xanthonotus is here regarded as a subspecies of P. parvus. Williams et al. (1993) and Jones et al. (1997) concluded that xanthonotus does not warrant recognition as a distinct species. Patton (in Wilson and Reeder 2005) included xanthonotus as a subspecies of P. parvus.
See Best (1994) for a key to the species of Perognathus.
Trusted
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!



