IUCN threat status:

Not evaluated

Comprehensive Description

Read full entry

Myrmica afghanica HNS , sp. nov.

= M. tibetana HNS : Collingwood 1961: 36, 6w, 1q, Afghanistan, Pashki Nuristan, 6.iv. (sic!), [19]48, leg. K. Paludan, misidentification, not Mayr, 1889: 279 et al.

Material examined. Holotype worker, " Afghanistan , PashkiNuristan , 6.vi. (sic!) 48 , leg. K. Paludan ";

paratypes : 2 workers and 1 queen (dealate, specimen without postpetiole and gaster), same labels as holotype (University Museum Copenhagen).

FIGURES 1-6. M. afghanica HNS (holotype, worker): 1- head, frontal view, 2-alitrunk and waist in profile, 3-alitrunk and waist from above, 4-antennal scape in profile, 5-antennal scape from above, 6- tibia and first tarsal joint of hind leg.

Description

Workers (Figs 1-6): Head long, with parallel sides, straight or very feebly concave occipital margin, and narrowly rounded occipital corners. Anterior clypeal margin prominent and pointed medially. Frontal carinae short, almost straight, not curving outwards to merge with the rugae, which surround antennal sockets. Frons wide, frontal lobes relatively narrow (see indices below). Antennal scape long and slender, very feebly curved at the base, without trace of angle or carina. Alitrunk dorsum feebly convex, metanotal groove very shallow. Propodeal spines short but sharp, projected backwards and upwards (at an angle about 45°). Petiole with long anterior peduncle, in profile petiolar node dorsum broadly rounded and postpetiole sub-globular.

Head dorsum having mostly a relatively coarse, longitudinal rugulosity, only the lateral parts and occiput having reticulation. Frons between frontal carinae level with the eyes with less than 13 rugae. Surfaces between rugae appearing shiny, being at most very finely, superficially sculptured. Promesonotal dorsum mostly longitudinally rugose, only anterior half of pronotum with coarse reticulation; sculpture on propodeal dorsum partly reduced; sides of alitrunk with longitudinal, slightly sinuous rugae. Petiolar and postpetiolar nodes with longitudinally-concentric rugae. Tibiae of hind and middle legs with well developed, pectinate spur. Quite hairy species. Antennal scape and legs with very abundant and long hairs that are almost erect on scape and sub-erect on legs; the longest hairs on antennal scape distinctly longer than maximal diameter of the scape. Body colour light brown to black, appendages yellowish brown.

Measurements (mm) and indices (data for holotype in parenthesis): HL 1.02-1.12 (1.06), HW 0.82-0.88 (0.84), FW 0.35-0.39 (0.36), FLW 0.37-0.40 (0.39), SL 0.82 - 0.86 (0.86), AL 1.42-1.52 (1.50), HTL 0.74-0.82 (0.76), PNW 0.60-0.63 (0.60), PL 0.40-0.41 (0.40), PW 0.23-0.24 (0.24), PH 0.30-0.33 (0.31), PPL 0.32-0.33 (0.33), PPW 0.36 (0.36), PPH 0.36-0.39 (0.36), ESL 0.19-0.23 (0.19), ESD 0.34 (0.34); CI 1.24-1.27 (1.26), FI 0.43-0.44 (0.43), FLI 1.03-1.06 (1.06), SI1 0.75-0.81 (0.81), SI2 0.95-1.02 (1.02), PI1 1.24-1.33 (1.32), PI2 0.47-0.49 (0.49), PPI1 0.85-0.92 (0.92), PPI2 1.00-1.08 (1.00), PPI3 1.50-1.56 (1.50), PPI4 0.41-0.44 (0.43), ESLI 0.23 -0.26 (0.23), ESDI 1.48-1.79 (1.79), HTI 0.45-0.47 (0.45).

Queen (specimen without postpetiole and gaster) (Figs 7-12): Relatively small compared to queens of many Myrmica HNS species but proportionately larger than the workers (about 25% larger on both HW and AL). Otherwise the general features of shape, sculpture and pilosity are very similar to the workers. It differs from the workers by the slightly convex lateral margins of the head, and the following details of the body sculpture: just longitudinal rugae present on the head dorsum and alitrunk with no reticulation; only the petiolar node dorsum has any reticulation. Postpetiole and gaster most probably also very similar to those of workers.

Measurements (mm) and indices: HL 1. 26, HW 1.06, FW 0.45, FLW 0.47, SL 1.00, AL 1.88, HTL 1.00, PL 0.51, PW 0.33, PH 0.43, ESL 0.19, ESD 0.42; CI 1.19, FI 0.42, FLI 1.04, SI1 0.75, SI2 0.94, PI1 1.55, PI2 0.48, ESLI, 0.18, ESDI 2.21, HTI 0.47, AI 1.59, SCI 1.62.

Etymology. This species is named after Afghanistan where it is probably endemic.

Distribution and ecology. We cannot find Pashki Nuristan, but the most probable locality is Nurestan (34°56' N, 70°22' E) located in a river valley of the Hindu Kush, about 60 km north of Jaelaelaebad and 120 km northeast of Kabul. If we are correct and M afghanica HNS is a member of the rubra HNS species-group (see below), then it might be distributed more widely in the Hindu Kush mountains of Afghanistan, northwards into the adjacent territories of Tadzhikistan and the western slopes of the Pamirs. On the other hand, it could be a true Himalayan endemic belonging to the smythiesii-group HNS (see below) either with a restricted local distribution or perhaps also living on the lower slopes of the Karakorum in Pakistan and northwest India. Nothing is known about its ecology but if we have truly identified the type locality, then it probably lives at lower altitudes (1000-2000m) where it is should be associated with river valleys.

FIGURES 7-12. M. afghanica HNS (paratype, queen): 7-head, frontal view, 8- alitrunk and waist in profile, 9-alitrunk and waist from above, 10-antennal scape in profile, 11-antennal scape from above, 12-tibia and first tarsal joint of hind leg.

Taxonomic position and discussion. Until the features of the males of M. afghanica HNS are described it is impossible to place it, with any certainty, in known Myrmica HNS speciesgroups(see Radchenko and Elmes 2001). Based on the female castes M. afghanica HNS could belong to either the rubra-group HNS or the smythiesii-group HNS . It is most similar to the species of the dshungarica-complex HNS of the rubra HNS species-group, which are distributed in Central Asia, and therefore, like M. tenuispina HNS , it might have invaded Afghanistan from the north. On the other hand if it belongs to the smythiesii-group HNS it is probably a true endemic of the region.

Workers and queens of the species in the rubra- HNS and smythiesii-groups HNS are characterized by a long and slender antennal scape, which is gently curved at the base without any angle or carina, by their short, almost straight frontal carinae and wide frons (FI> 0.40) and quite narrow frontal lobes (FLI <1.15). Males from these groups are characterized by a quite long antennal scape, but the scape of rubra-group HNS males is even longer than that of the smythiesii-group HNS (Radchenko and Elmes 2001). Workers and queens are relatively small, like many other species in the rubra-group HNS .

With the current knowledge M. afghanica HNS can no longer be confused with M. tibetana HNS despite M. tibetana HNS being placed in the rubra-group HNS by Radchenko (1994a). We considered this earlier opinion wrong and proposed that M. tibetana HNS characterizes its own species-group(Radchenko and Elmes 2001) because it appears to have more in common with species from the scabrinodis-group HNS rather than species from either the rubra- HNS or smythiesii-groups HNS . For example, workers of the species belonging to the tibetana-group HNS are characterized by frontal carinae curved at their anterior third and frontal lobes that are relatively wide and sub-square (FLI> 1.30 versus <1.15), features typically seen in scabrinodis-group HNS species. Also the males of tibetana-group HNS species have a short antennal scape like those of the scabrinodis-group HNS . However, the scabrinodis-group HNS clearly differs from the tibetana-group HNS by its S-shaped frontal carinae that are curved from their midlength.

If M. afghanica HNS is a member of the dshungarica-complex HNS (i.e. M. dshungarica HNS , M. juglandeti HNS , M. ferganensis HNS and M. kryzhanovskii HNS which mainly live in the Tien-Shan and Pamir Mountains - see Radchenko 1994a) then it most resembles M. kryzhanovskii HNS . Both have long and abundant standing hairs on the legs and antennal scape but M. afghanica HNS differs from M. kryzhanovskii HNS by its prominent and medially-pointed anterior clypeal margin, by much shorter propodeal spines (ESLI 0.23-0.26 versus> 0.30) and by a relatively coarser longitudinal rugosity on the head dorsum (frons between frontal carinae level with the eyes with less than 13 rugae versus more than 15 in M. kryzhanovskii HNS ).

The other three species have much less abundant and shorter hairs on their legs and antennal scapes. M. afghanica HNS also differs from M. dshungarica HNS by the parallel sides of its head, as opposed to convex sides, by a much longer petiolar peduncle and by the distinctly concave anterior surface and rounded dorsum of the petiolar node, versus the steep anterior surface and distinctly flattened dorsum of the petiolar node seen in M. dshungarica HNS . M. afghanica's HNS prominent and pointed anteromedian clypeal margin well separates it from both M. juglandeti HNS and M. ferganensis HNS , which have less prominent and broadly-rounded anteromedian clypeal margins (see also Arnoldi 1976; Tarbinsky 1976; Radchenko 1994b).

Trusted

Public Domain

MagnoliaPress via Plazi

Source: Plazi.org

Belongs to 0 communities

This taxon hasn't been featured in any communities yet.

Learn more about Communities

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!