Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Brazil (South America)
Colombia (South America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
- Forzza, R. C. & et al. 2010. 2010 Lista de espécies Flora do Brasil. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/2010/. http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/100002289
- Molina Rosito, A. 1975. Enumeración de las plantas de Honduras. Ceiba 19(1): 1–118. http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/866
- Standley, P. C. & J. A. Steyermark. 1958. Araceae, in Flora of Guatemala. Fieldiana, Bot. 304–363. http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/899
- Idárraga-Piedrahita, A., R. D. C. Ortiz, R. Callejas Posada & M. Merello. 2011. Flora de Antioquia. Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares, vol. 2. Listado de las Plantas Vasculares del Departamento de Antioquia. Pp. 1-939. http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/100008595
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Barcode data: Philodendron sp. ML-2010
No available public DNA sequences.
Download FASTA File
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Philodendron sp. ML-2010
Public Records: 1
Specimens with Barcodes: 1
Species With Barcodes: 1
Locations of barcode samples
Statistics of barcoding coverage
|Specimen Records:||37||Public Records:||25|
|Specimens with Sequences:||45||Public Species:||9|
|Specimens with Barcodes:||45||Public BINs:||0|
|Species With Barcodes:||10|
Philodendron is a large genus of flowering plants in the Araceae family, consisting of about 900 species according to TROPICOS (a service of the Missouri Botanical Garden). Other sources quote different numbers of species: S.J. Mayo reports about 350-400 formally recognised species, whereas Croat lists about 700. Regardless of number of species, the genus is the second-largest member of the arum family. Taxonomically, the genus Philodendron is still poorly known, with many undescribed species. Many are grown as ornamental and indoor plants. The name derives from the Greek words philo or "love" and dendron or "tree". They are commonly called by their generic name.
Philodendron species can be found in many diverse habitats in the tropical Americas and the West Indies. Most occur in humid tropical forests, but can also be found in swamps and on river banks, roadsides and rock outcrops. They are also found throughout the diverse range of elevations from sea level to over 2000 m above sea level. Species of this genus are often found clambering over other plants, or climbing the trunks of trees with the aid of aerial roots. Philodendrons usually distinguish themselves in their environment by their large numbers compared to other plants, making them a highly noticeable component of the ecosystems in which they are found. They are found in great numbers in road clearings.
Growth habit 
Compared to other genera of the family Araceae, philodendrons have an extremely diverse array of growth methods. The habits of growth can be epiphytic, hemiepiphytic, or rarely terrestrially. Others can show a combination of these growth habits depending on the environment. Hemiepiphytic philodendrons can be classified into two types: primary and secondary hemiepiphytes. A primary hemiepiphytic philodendron starts life high up in the canopy where the seed initially sprouts. The plant then grows as an epiphyte. Once it has reached a sufficient size and age, it will begin producing aerial roots that grow toward the forest floor. Once they reach the forest floor, nutrients can be obtained directly from the soil. In this manner, the plant's strategy is to obtain light early in its life at the expense of nutrients. Some primary epiphytic species have a symbiotic relationship with ants. In these species, the ants' nest is grown amongst the plant's roots, which help keep the nest together. Philodendrons have extrafloral nectaries, glands that secrete nectar to attract the ants. The philodendron, in turn, obtains nutrients from the surrounding ant nest, and the aggressive nature of the ants serves to protect the plant from other insects which would eat it.
Secondary hemiepiphytes start life on the ground or on part of a tree trunk very close to the ground, where the seeds sprout. These philodendrons have their roots in the ground early in their lives. They then begin climbing up a tree and eventually may become completely epithytic, doing away with their subterranean roots. Secondary hemiepiphytes do not always start their lives close to a tree. For these philodendrons, the plant will grow with long internodes along the ground until a tree is found. They find a suitable tree by growing towards darker areas, such as the dark shadow of a tree. This trait is called scototropism. After a tree has been found, the scototropic behavior stops and the philodendron switches to a phototropic growth habit and the internodes shorten and thicken. Usually, however, philodendrons germinate on trees.
The leaves are usually large and imposing, often lobed or deeply cut, and may be more or less pinnate. They can also be oval, spear-shaped, or in many other possible shape variations. The leaves are borne alternately on the stem. An interesting quality of philodendrons is that they do not have a single type of leaf on the same plant. Instead, they have juvenile leaves and adult leaves, which can be drastically different from one another. The leaves of seedling philodendrons are usually heart-shaped. Early in the life of the plant, but after it has matured past the seedling stage, the leaves will have acquired the typical juvenile leaf's shape and size. Later in the philodendron's life, it starts producing adult leaves, a process called metamorphosis. Most philodendrons go through metamorphosis gradually; there is no immediately distinct difference between juvenile and adult leaves. Aside from being typically much bigger than the juvenile leaves, the shape of adult leaves can be significantly different. In fact, considerable taxonomic difficulty has occurred in the past due to these differences, causing juvenile and adult plants to mistakenly be classified as different species. The trigger for the transformation to adult leaves can vary considerably. One possible trigger is the height of the plant. Secondary hemiepiphytes start off on the dark forest floor and climb their way up a tree, displaying their juvenile type leaves along the way. Once they reach a sufficient height, they begin developing adult type leaves. The smaller juvenile leaves are used for the darker forest floor where light is in scarce supply, but once they reach a sufficient height in the canopy the light is bright enough that the bigger adult leaves can serve a useful purpose. Another possible trigger occurs in primary hemiepiphytes. These philodendrons typically send their aerial roots downward. Once their roots have reached the ground below, the plant will begin taking up nutrients from the soil, of which it had been previously deprived. As a result, the plant will quickly morph into its adult leaves and gain in size dramatically. Another interesting quality of philodendrons leaves is they are often quite different in shape and size even between two plants of the same species. As a result of all these different possible leaf shapes, it is often difficult to differentiate natural variations from morphogenesis.
Philodendrons also produce cataphylls, which are modified leaves that surround and protect the newly forming leaves. Cataphylls are usually green, leaf-like, and rigid while they are protecting the leaf. In some species, they can even be rather succulent. Once the leaf has been fully formed, the cataphyll usually remains attached where the stem and base of the leaf meet. In philodendrons, cataphylls typically fall into two categories: deciduous and persistent types. A deciduous cataphyll curls away from the leaf once it has formed, eventually turning brown and drying out, and finally falling off the plant, leaving a scar on the stem where it was attached. Deciduous cataphylls are typically found on vining philodendrons, whereas persistent cataphylls are typical of epiphytic philodendrons or appressed climbers. In the latter, the cataphylls are prevented from falling off in a timely manner due to the short internodes of the plant. The cataphylls will remain attached, drying out and becoming nothing more than fibers attached at the nodes. In some philodendrons, the cataphylls build up over time and eventually form a wet mass at the nodes. This may keep emerging roots moist and provide some form of lubrication to new leaves.
Philodendrons have both aerial and subterranean roots. The aerial roots occur in many shapes and sizes and originate from most of the plant's nodes or occasionally from an internode. The size and number of aerial roots per node depends on the presence of a suitable substrate for the roots to attach themselves. Aerial roots serve two primary purposes. They allow the philodendron to attach itself to a tree or other plant, and they allow it to collect water and nutrients. As such, the roots are divided morphologically into these two categories. Aerial roots used for attaching to trees tend to be shorter, more numerous, and sometimes have a layer of root hairs attached; those used for collecting water and nutrients tend to be thicker and longer. These feeder roots tend to attach flush with the substrate to which the philodendron is attached, and make their way directly downwards in search of soil. In general, feeder roots tend to show both positive hydrotropic and negative heliotropic behaviors. Characteristic of roots in philodendrons is the presence of a sclerotic hypodermis, which are cylindrical tubes inside the epidermis that can be one to five cells long. The cells that line the sclerotic hypodermis are elongated and tend to be hardened. Underneath the epidermis is a unique layer of cells in a pattern of long cells followed by short cells.
Extrafloral nectaries 
Some philodendrons have extrafloral nectaries (nectar-producing glands found outside of the flowers). The nectar attracts ants, with which the plant enjoys a protective symbiotic relationship. Nectaries can be found in a variety of locations on the plant, including the stalks, sheaths, lower surfaces of the leaves, and spathes. The nectaries produce a sweet, sticky substance the ants like to eat and which provides an incentive for them to build their nests amongst the roots of the given philodendron. In some cases, the amount of nectar produced can be quite extensive, resulting in the surface becoming entirely covered with it.
Philodendrons can contain as much as 0.7% of oxalates in the form of calcium oxalate crystals as raphides. The risk of death, if even possible, is extremely low if ingested by an average adult, although its consumption is generally considered unhealthy. In general, the calcium oxalate crystals have a very mild effect on humans, and large quantities have to be consumed for symptoms to even appear. Possible symptoms include increased salivation, a sensation of burning of the mouth, swelling of the tongue, stomatitis, dysphagia, an inability to speak, and edema. Cases of mild dermatitis due to contact with the leaves have also been reported, with symptoms including vesiculation and erythema. The chemical derivatives of alkenyl resorcinol are believed to be responsible for the dermatitis in some people. Contact with philodendron oils or fluids with the eyes have also been known to result in conjunctivitis. Fatal poisonings are extremely rare; one case of an infant eating small quantities of a philodendron resulting in hospitalization and death has been reported. This one case study, however, was found to be inconsistent with the findings from a second study. In this study, 127 cases of children ingesting philodendrons were studied, and they found only one child showed symptoms; a 10-month-old had minor upper lip swelling when he chewed on a philodendron leaf. The study also found the symptoms could subside without treatment and that previously reported cases of severe complications were exaggerated.
As to the toxicity of philodendrons in cats, the evidence is conflicting. In one study, 72 cases of cat poisonings were examined, of which 37 resulted in the death of the cat. The symptoms of the poisoned cats included excitability, spasms, seizures, renal failure, and encephalitis. However, in another study, three cats were tube fed Philodendron cordatum and showed no signs of acute poisoning. In this study, two adult cats and one kitten were fed a puréed leaf and water mixture, observed afterward, then euthanized, and finally a necropsy was performed. Dosages of 2.8, 5.6, and 9.1 g/kg were used, with the highest dose administered being considerably more than any house cat could consume. The cats showed none of the symptoms found in past epidemiological studies and appeared normal. Necropsies showed nothing that would suggest toxicity. The past epidemiological studies have been suggested to be wrong, since sick cats may be inclined to eat plants to alleviate their illnesses. If this were the case, then such studies would be incorrectly attributing the sickness of the cats to the philodendrons. The forced feeding study may have failed to show signs of philodendron toxicity because the tube feeding bypassed the mouth and hence minimized the typical signs of irritation.
Some philodendrons are, however, known to be toxic to mice and rats. In one study, 100 mg of Philodendron cordatum leaves suspended in distilled water were fed to six mice. Three of the mice died. The same experiment was done with 100 mg of P. cordatum stems on three mice and none of them died. Leaves and flowers of Philodendron sagittifolium were also orally administered in 100-mg doses to the mice. Three mice were used for each of the leaves and flowers; none of the mice died. A similar experiment was done on rats with the leaves and stems of P. cordatum, but instead of oral administration of the dose, it was injected intraperitoneally using 3 g of plant extract from either the leaves or stems. Six rats were injected with the leaf extract and five of them died. Eight rats were injected with the stem extract and two of them died.
When philodendrons are ready to reproduce, they will produce an inflorescence which consists of a leaf-like hood called a spathe within which is enclosed a tube-like structure called a spadix. Depending on the species, a single inflorescence can be produced or a cluster of up to 11 inflorescences can be produced at a single time on short peduncles. The spathe tends to be waxy and is usually bicolored. In some philodendrons, the colour of the base of the spathe contrasts in colour with the upper part, and in others, the inner and outer surfaces of the spathe differ in coloration. The paler colour tends to be either white or green, and the darker usually red or crimson. Pelargonidin is the predominant pigment causing the red coloration in the spathes. The upper portion of the spathe is called the limb or blade, while the lower portion is called the convolute tube or chamber due to its tubular structure at the base. The spadix is more often than not white and shorter than the spathe. On the spadix are found fertile female, fertile male, and sterile male flowers. The fertile male and female flowers are separated on the spadix by a sterile zone or staminodal region composed of sterile male flowers. This barrier of sterile male flowers ensures fertile male flowers do not fertilize the female flowers. The arrangement tends to be vertical, with fertile male flowers at the top of the spadix followed by sterile male flowers, and fertile female flowers very close to the bottom in the region known as the spathe tube or chamber. In some philodendrons, an additional region of sterile male flowers is found at the very top of the spadix. The fertile female flowers are often not receptive to fertilization when the fertile males are producing pollen, which again prevents self-pollination. The pollen itself is thread-like and appears to project out from the region where the fertile male flowers are located.
Sexual reproduction is achieved by means of beetles, with many philodendron species requiring the presence of a specific beetle species to achieve pollination. The reverse is not always the case, as many beetle species will pollinate more than one philodendron species. These same beetles could also pollinate other genera outside of philodendron, as well as outside of the family Araceae. The pollinating beetles are males and members of the subfamily Rutelinae and Dynastinae, and to date the only beetles seen to pollinate the inflorescence are in the genera Cyclocephala or Erioscelis. Other smaller types of beetles in the genus Neelia visit the inflorescences, as well, but they are not believed to be involved in pollinating philodendrons. To attract the beetles, the sterile male flowers give off pheromones to attract the male beetles, usually at dusk. This process, female anthesis, is followed by male anthesis, in which the pollen is produced. Female anthesis typically lasts up to two days, and includes the gradual opening of the spathe to allow the beetles to enter. Some evidence suggest the timing of opening of the spathe is dependent on light levels, where cloudy, darker days result in the spathe opening up earlier than on clear days. During female anthesis, the spadix will project forward at roughly 45° relative to the spathe.
The spathe provides a safe breeding area for the beetles. As such, the male beetles are often followed by female beetles with the intent of mating with the males within the spathe. The philodendrons benefit from this symbiotic relationship because the males will eventually leave the spathe covered in pollen and repeat the process at another philodendron, pollinating it in the process and thus providing philodendrons a means of sexual reproduction. In addition to gaining a safe location to mate, the male beetles may benefit from having a central location, because it allows them to broadcast to females that they are willing and able to mate. Females which see a male beetle headed for a philodendron flower know he does so with intention of mating, and females which are sexually receptive and need to mate know that they can find males if they follow the pheromones produced by the philodendron flowers. As a result, the male beetles benefit from this relationship with the philodendrons because they do not have to produce pheromones to attract females, since the philodendrons do it for them. Additionally, male beetles benefit because they are ensured of mating with only sexually receptive females, which is not necessarily certain otherwise. In doing so, the philodendron provides male beetles a more efficient way to find females than what they could achieve on their own. Interestingly, pheromones produced by the philodendrons may be similar to those produced by female beetles when they wish to attract males to mate. Also, the pheromones have a sweet, fruity smell in many species and no noticeable smell for others. In addition to the reproductive benefits to beetles, the philodendrons provide food in two forms. Pollen from the fertile male flowers is eaten by the beetles throughout the night. Secondly, the sterile male flowers consumed by the beetles are rich in lipids.
The male beetles will stay overnight in the spathe, eating and mating throughout the night due to the benefits provided by the spathe and spadix. Typically, five to 12 beetles will be within the spathe throughout the night. Rarely, cases of 200 beetles at a time have been observed and almost always the beetles are of the same species. Another interesting feature of this symbiotic relationship, less well understood, is the series of events in which the spadix begins to heat up prior to the spathe opening up for the beetles. This process is known as thermogenesis. By the time the spathe is open and the beetles have arrived, the spadix is usually quite hot; up to around 46°C in some species, but usually around 35°C. The thermogenesis coincides with the arrival of the beetles and appears to increase their presence. The maximum temperature reached by the spadix remains about 20°C higher than the outside ambient temperature. The time dependence of the temperature can vary from species to species. In some species, the temperature of the spadix will peak on the arrival of the beetles, then decrease, and finally increase reaching a maximum once again when the philodendron is ready for the beetles to leave. Other species, though, only show a maximum temperature on the arrival of the beetles, which remains roughly constant for about a day, and then steadily decreases. A few species will show three peaks in temperature during the flowering. The increased temperature increases the metabolism of the beetles, causing them to move about more within the spathe and increasing the likelihood they will be sufficiently coated with pollen. A sticky resin is also produced in drops attached to the spadix which help to keep the pollen attached to the beetles. This resin producing quality is unique to Philodendron and Monstera, as other genera of Araceae do not produce it on their spadices. The resin is also found on the stems, leaves, and roots of philodendrons. Its color can be red, orange, yellow, or colorless when it is first produced. Yet, over time, it will turn brown as it is exposed to air. Also, some evidence suggests the thermogenesis triggers the beetles to mate. It also appears to distribute the pheromones into the air. The reason for the spadix being held at 45° relative to the spathe may be to maximize the heat's ability to waft the pheromones into the air. Oxidizing stored carbohydrates and lipids has been found to be the energy source fot thermogenesis. The part of the spadix that heats up is the sterile zone. As it heats up, carbohydrates are used, but once the spadix has reached its maximum temperature, lipids are oxidized. The lipids are not first converted to carbohydrates, but rather are directly oxidized. The thermogenic reaction is triggered when concentrations of acetosalicytic acid form in the sterile zone. The acid sets off the mitochondria in the cells that make up the sterile zone to switch to an electron transport chain called the cyanide-resistant pathway, which results in the production of heat. Philodendrons consume oxygen during thermogenesis. The rate at which oxygen is used is remarkably high, close to that of hummingbirds and sphinx moths. The spadix has been shown to generate infrared radiation. As the beetles home in on the inflorescence, they first move in a zig-zag pattern until they get reasonably close, when they switch to a straight-line path. The beetles may be using scent to find the inflorescence when they are far away, but once within range, they find it by means of the infrared radiation. This would account for the two different types of paths the beetles follow.
Once female anthesis is nearing its end and the female flowers have been pollinated, the spathe will be fully open and male anthesis begins. In the beginning of male anthesis, the fertile male flowers complete the process of producing the pollen and the female flowers become unreceptive to further pollination. Additionally, the spadix moves from its 45° position and presses up flush to the spathe. Towards the end of male anthesis, the spathe begins to close from the bottom, working its way up and forcing the beetles to move up and across the upper region of the spathe, where the fertile male flowers are located. In doing so, the philodendron controls when the beetles come and when they leave and forces them to rub against the top of the spadix where the pollen is located as they exit, thus ensuring they are well-coated with pollen. One would expect the beetles to stay indefinitely if they could due to the very favorable conditions the inflorescence provides. After male anthesis, the males will go off and find another philodendron undergoing female anthesis, so will pollinate the female flowers with the pollen it had collected from its previous night of mating.
Botanically, the fruit produced is a berry. The berries develop later in the season; berry development time varies from species to species from a few weeks to a year, although most philodendrons take a few months. The spathe will enlarge to hold the maturing berries. Once the fruit are mature, the spathe will begin to open again, but this time it will break off at the base and fall to the forest floor. Additionally, the berries are edible, although they contain calcium oxalate crystals, and have a taste akin to bananas.
The color of the berries can vary depending on the species, but most produce a white berry with slight tones of green. Some produce orange berries and others yellow berries, though. Still others will produce berries that start off white, but then change to another color with time. Philodendrons that produce orange berries tend to be members of the section Calostigma. Contained within the berries are the seeds which are extremely small compared to other members of the Araceae family. The berries often give off odors to attract animals to eat and disperse them. For example, Philodendron alliodorum berries are known to emit an odor similar to that of garlic. The animals that distribute the seeds depends on the species, but some possible dispersers include bats and monkeys. Insects also may be responsible for dispersing seeds, as beetles and wasps have been seen feeding on philodendron berries.
Philodendrons exhibit extremely few physical reproductive barriers to prevent hybridization, but very few natural hybrids are found in nature. This may be because philodendrons have many geographic and time barriers to prevent any such cross pollination. For example, its rare for more than one philodendron species to be flowering at the same time or to be pollinated by the same species of beetles. The beetles have also been observed to be selective to the height of the plant they pollinate, which would serve as an additional preventive measure to make hybrids less likely. Because of these outside barriers, philodendrons may not have had to evolve physical mechanisms to prevent cross-pollination. Hybrids in nature are only rarely reported. When found, these hybrids often can show remarkable genetic relationships. Crosses between two philodendrons in different sections can occur successfully.
Philodendrons can be grown outdoors in mild climates in shady spots. They thrive in moist soils with high organic matter. In milder climates, they can be grown in pots of soil or in the case of Philodendron oxycardium in containers of water. Indoors plants thrive at temperatures between 15 and 18°C and can survive at lower light levels than other house plants. Although philodendrons can survive in dark places, they much prefer bright lights. Wiping the leaves off with water will remove any dust and insects. Plants in pots with good root systems will benefit from a weak fertilizer solution every other week.
New plants can be grown by taking stem cuttings with at least two joints. Cuttings then can be rooted in pots of sand and peat moss mixtures. These pots are placed in greenhouses with bottom heat of 21-24°C. During the rooting, cuttings should be kept out of direct sunlight. Once rooted, the plants can be transplanted to larger pots or directly outside in milder climates. Stem cuttings, particularly from trailing varieties, can be rooted in water. In four to five weeks, the plant should develop roots and can be transferred to pots.
Hybridizing philodendrons is extremely easy if flowering plants are available, because they have very few barriers to prevent hybridization. However, some aspects of making crosses can make philodendron hybridization more difficult. Philodendrons often flower at different times and the time when the spathe opens up varies from plant to plant. The pollen and the inflorescence both have short lives, which means a large collection of philodendrons is necessary if crossbreeding is to be done successfully. The pollen life can be extended to a few weeks by storing it in film canisters in a refrigerator. Artificial pollination is usually achieved by first mixing the pollen with water. A window is then cut into the spathe and the water-pollen mixture is rubbed on the fertile female flowers. The entire spathe is then covered in a plastic bag so the water-pollen mixture does not dry out; the bag is removed a few days later. If the inflorescence has not been fertilized, it will fall off, usually within a few weeks.
The resins produced during the flowering of Monstera and Philodendron are known to be used by Trigona bees in the construction of their nests. Native Indians from South America use the resin from the bees' nests to make their blowguns air- and watertight.
Though they contain calcium oxalate crystals, the berries of some species are eaten by the locals. For example, Philodendron bipinnatifidum white sweet berries are known to be used. Additionally, the aerial roots are also used for rope in this particular species.
Also, in the making of a particular recipe for curare by the Amazonian Taiwanos, the leaves and stems of an unknown philodendron species are used. The leaves and stems are mixed with the bark of Vochysia ferruginea and with some parts of a species in the genus Strychnos.
Yet another use of philodendrons is for catching fish. A tribe in the Colombian Amazon is known to use Philodendron craspedodromum to add poison to the water, temporarily stunning the fish, which rise up to the surface, where they can be easily scooped up. To add the poison to the water, the leaves are cut into pieces and tied together to form bundles, which are allowed to ferment for a few days. The bundles are crushed and added to the water into which the poison will dissipate. Although the toxicity of Philodendron craspedodromum is not fully known, active ingredients in the poisoning of the fish possibly are coumarins formed during the fermentation process.
Some philodendrons are also used for ceremonial purposes. Among the Kubeo tribe, native to Colombia, Philodendron insigne is used by witch doctors to treat ill patients. They use the juice of the spathe to stain their hands red, since many such tribes view the color red as a sign of power.
Philodendrons are known to have been collected from the wild as early as 1644 by Georg Marcgraf, but the first partly successful scientific attempt to collect and classify the genus was done by Charles Plumier. Plumier collected approximately six species from the islands of Martinique, Hispaniola, and St. Thomas. Since then, many exploration attempts have been made to collect new species by others. These include those by N.J. Jacquin who collected new species in the West Indies, Colombia, and Venezuela. At this time in history, the names of the philodendrons they were discovering were being published with the genus name Arum, since most aroids were considered to belong to this same genus. The genus Philodendron had not yet been created. Throughout the late 17th, 18th century, and early 19th centuries, many plants were removed from the genus Arum and placed into newly created genera in an attempt to improve the classification. Heinrich Wilhelm Schott addressed the problem of providing improved taxonomy and created the genus Philodendron and described it in 1829. The genus was first spelled as 'Philodendrum', but in 1832, Schott published a system for classifying plants in the family Araceae titled Meletemata Botanica in which he provided a method of classifying philodendrons based on flowering characteristics. In 1856, Schott published a revision of his previous work titled Synopsis aroidearum, and then published his final work Prodromus Systematis Aroidearum in 1860, in which he provided even more details about the classification of Philodendron and described 135 species.
Modern classification 
Philodendron are usually extremely distinctive and not usually confused with other genera, although a few exceptions in the genera Anthurium and Homalomena resemble Philodendron. The genus Philodendron is subdivided into several sections and subsections:
Section Baursia, section Philopsammos, section Philodendron (subsections Achyropodium, Canniphyllium, Macrolonchium, Philodendron, Platypodium, Psoropodium and Solenosterigma), section Calostigma (subsections Bulaoana, Eucardium, Glossophyllum, Macrobelium and Oligocarpidium), section Tritomophyllum, section Schizophyllum, section Polytomium, section Macrogyniumand section Camptogynium.
Typically, the inflorescence is of great importance in determining the species of a given philodendron, since it tends to be less variable than the leaves. The genus Philodendron could be classified further by means of differentiating them based on the pattern of thermogenesis observed, although this is not currently used.
Selected species 
- Philodendron acutatum Schott
- Philodendron adamantinum Mart. ex Schott
- Philodendron alliodorum Croat & Grayum
- Philodendron auriculatum Standl. & L. O. Williams
- Philodendron bipennifolium Schott
- Philodendron bipinnatifidum Schott ex Endl. - tree philodendron
- Philodendron chimboanum Engl.
- Philodendron consanguineum Schott - rascagarganta
- Philodendron cordatum (Vell.) Kunth
- Philodendron crassinervium Lindl.
- Philodendron cruentospathum Madison
- Philodendron davidsonii Croat
- Philodendron devansayeanum L. Linden
- Philodendron domesticum G. S. Bunting
- Philodendron ensifolium Croat & Grayum
- Philodendron erubescens K. Koch & Augustin
- Philodendron eximium Schott
- Philodendron fragrantissimum (Hook.) G. Don in Sweet
- Philodendron ferrugineum Croat
- Philodendron giganteum Schott - giant philodendron
- Philodendron gigasCroat
- Philodendron gloriosum André
- Philodendron gualeanum Engl.
- Philodendron hastatum K. Koch & Sello - silver philodendron, also known incorrectly as Philodendron glaucophyllum
- Philodendron hederaceum (Jacq.) Schott - vilevine, heartleaf philodendron, velvet-leaved philodendron
- Philodendron herbaceum Croat & Grayum
- Philodendron hooveri Croat & Grayum
- Philodendron imbe Schott ex Endl. - philodendron
- Philodendron jacquinii Schott
- Philodendron lacerum (Jacq.) Schott
- Philodendron lingulatum (L.) K. Koch - treelover
- Philodendron mamei André
- Philodendron marginatum Urban - Puerto Rico philodendron
- Philodendron martianum Engl.
- Philodendron mayoii Symon Mayo
- Philodendron maximum K. Krause
- Philodendron melanochrysum Linden & André
- Philodendron microstictum Standl. & L. O. Williams
- Philodendron musifolium Engl.
- Philodendron nanegalense Engl.
- Philodendron opacum Croat & Grayum
- Philodendron ornatum Schott
- Philodendron pachycaule K. Krause
- Philodendron panduriforme (Kunth) Kunth
- Philodendron pedatum (Hook.) Kunth
- Philodendron pinnatifidum (Jacq.) Schott
- Philodendron pogonocaule Madison
- Philodendron quitense Engl.
- Philodendron radiatum Schott
- Philodendron recurvifolium Schott
- Philodendron renauxii Reitz
- Philodendron riparium Engl.
- Philodendron robustum Schott
- Philodendron rugosum Bogner & G.S.Bunting
- Philodendron sagittifolium Liebm.
- Philodendron santa leopoldina Liebm.
- Philodendron speciosum Schott
- Philodendron sphalerum Schott
- Philodendron squamiferum Poepp.
- Philodendron standleyi Grayum
- Philodendron tripartitum (Jacq.) Schott
- Philodendron validinervium Engl.
- Philodendron ventricosum Madison
- Philodendron verrucosum L. Mathieu ex Schott
- Philodendron victoriae G.S. Bunting
- Philodendron warscewiczii K. Koch & C. D. Bouché
- Philodendron wendlandii Schott
- Philodendron xanadu Croat, Mayo & J. Boos
- Mayo 1990, p. 37
- Croat 1997, p. 312
- Gonçalves & Mayo 2000, p. 483
- Croat & Yu 2006, p. 892
- Croat, Mora & Kirkman 2007, p. 322
- Foxcroft, Richardson & Wilson 2008, p. 44
- Croat 1985, p. 252
- Yu 1994, pp. 222–223
- Gibernau et al. 2008, p. 689
- Ray 1990, pp. 1599–1609
- Bell & Bryan 2008, p. 26
- Orihuela & Waechter 2010, pp. 119–122
- Croat 1985, pp. 253–254
- French 1987, pp. 891–903
- Blüthgen et al. 2000, pp. 229–240
- Frohne & Pfänder 2005, pp. 73–74
- McIntire, Guest & Porterfield 1990
- Mrvos, Dean & Krenzelok 1991, p. 490
- Greer 1961
- Sellers et al. 1978, pp. 92–96
- Der Marderosian, Giller & Roia Jr. 1976, pp. 939–953
- Chouteau, Barabé & Gibernauy 2006, p. 818
- Barabé, Gibernau & Forest 2002, p. 80
- Gibernau et al. 1999, p. 1135
- Gibernau et al. 1999, p. 1141
- Gottsberger & Silberbauer-Gottsberger 1991, p. 26
- Seymour & Gibernau 2008, pp. 1353–1354
- Nagy, Odell & Seymour 1972, p. 1195
- Gibernau & Barabé 2000, pp. 685–689
- Barabé, Gibernau & Forest 2002, p. 81
- Gonçalves 1997, p. 500
- Vieira & Izar 1999, pp. 75–82
- Gorchov et al. 1995, p. 240
- Gibernau et al. 2002, pp. 1017–1023
- Swithinbank 2005, p. 97
- Philodendron | Botany .com
- McColley & Miller 1965, pp. 411–412
- Mayo 1991, p. 624
- Murphy & Breed 2008, p. 40
- Richard-Hansen, Bello & Vié 1998, p. 547
- Plowman 1969, p. 110
- Plowman 1969, p. 111
- Mayo 1990, pp. 38–39
- Sakuragui 2001, p. 102
- Mayo 1990, pp. 45–49
- Schott 1832
- Schott 1856
- Schott 1860
- Gauthier, Barabé & Bruneau 2008, pp. 13–27
- Croat 1997, p. 311–704
- Gibernau & Barabé 2000, p. 688
- Barabé, Denis; Gibernau, Marc; Forest, Félix (May 2002). "Zonal thermogenetic dynamics of two species of Philodendron from two different subgenera (Araceae)". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 139 (1): 79–86. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00040.x.
- Bell, Adrian D.; Bryan, Alan (2008). Plant Form: An Illustrated Guide to Flowering Plant Morphology. Timber Press. ISBN 0-88192-850-X.
- Blüthgen, Nico; Verhaagh, Manfred; Goitía, William; Jaffé, Klaus; Morawetz, Wilfried; Barthlott, Wilhelm (2000). "How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew". Oecologia (Springer-Verlag) 125 (2): 229–240. doi:10.1007/s004420000449.
- Bown, Deni (2000). Aroids: Plants of the Arum Family [ILLUSTRATED]. Timber Press. ISBN 0-88192-485-7.
- Chouteau, Mathieu; Barabé, Denis; Gibernau, Marc (2006). "A Comparative Study of Inflorescence Characters and Pollen-Ovule Ratios Among the Genera Philodendron and Anthurium (Araceae)". International Journal of Plant Sciences (The University of Chicago) 167 (4): 817–829.
- Croat, Thomas B. (1985). "Collecting and Preparing Specimens of Araceae". Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden (Missouri Botanical Garden Press) 72 (2): 252–258.
- Croat, Thomas B. (1997). "A Revision of Philodendron Subgenus Philodendron (Araceae) for Mexico and Central America". Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden (Missouri Botanical Garden Press) 84 (3): 311–704.
- Croat, Thomas B.; Yu, Guoqin (30 October 2006). "Four New Species of Philodendron (Araceae) from South America". Willdenowia (Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum, Berlin-Dahlem) 36 (2): 885–894.
- Croat, Thomas B.; Mora, Marcela; Kirkman, Ryan W. (2007). "Philodendron scherberichii (Araceae), a new endemic species from a high mountain forest in southwestern Colombia". Willdenowia 37: 319–322.
- Dart, Richard C. (15 December 2003). Medical Toxicology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 0-7817-2845-2.
- Der Marderosian, Ara H.; Giller, Fredrick B.; Roia Jr., Frank C. (July 1976). "Phytochemical and Toxicological Screening of Household Ornamental Plants Potentially Toxic to Humans". Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 1 (6): 939–953. doi:10.1080/15287397609529396.
- Foxcroft, Llewellyn C.; Richardson, David M.; Wilson, John R. U. (2008). "Ornamental Plants as Invasive Aliens: Problems and Solutions in Kruger National Park, South Africa". Environmental Management (Springer) 41 (1): 32–51. doi:10.1007/s00267-007-9027-9. PMID 17943344.
- French, J. C. (June 1987). "Systematic Occurrence of a Sclerotic Hypodermis in Roots of Araceae". American Journal of Botany (Botanical Society of America) 74 (6): 891–903.
- Frohne, Dietrich; Pfänder, Hans Jürgen (2005). Poisonous Plants: A Handbook for Doctors, Pharmacists, Toxicologists, Biologists, and Veterinarians (2nd ed.). Manson Publishing. ISBN 1-874545-94-4.
- Gauthier, Marie-Pierre L.; Barabé, Denis; Bruneau, Anne (2008). "Molecular phylogeny of the genus Philodendron (Araceae): delimitation and infrageneric classification". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 156 (1): 13–27. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00733.x.
- Gibernau, Marc; Barabé, Denis; Cerdan, Philippe; Dejean, Alain (November 1999). "Beetle Pollination of Philodendron solimoesense (Araceae) in French Guiana". International Journal of Plant Sciences (The University of Chicago Press) 160 (6): 1135–1143.
- Gibernau, Marc; Barabé, Denis (2000). "Thermogenesis in three Philodendron species (Araceae) of French Guiana". Canadian Journal of Botany 78 (5): 685–689. doi:10.1139/cjb-78-5-685.
- Gibernau, Marc; Albre, Jérôme; Dejean, Alain; Barabé, Denis (November 2002). "Seed Predation in Philodendron solimoesense (Araceae) by Chalcid Wasps (Hymenoptera)". International Journal of Plant Sciences (The University of Chicago Press) 163 (6): 1017–1023.
- Gibernau, Marc; Orivel, Jérome; Dejean, Alain; Delabie, Jacques; Barabé, Denis (2008). "Flowering as a key factor in ant–Philodendron interactions". Journal of Tropical Ecology (Cambridge University Press) 24: 689–692. doi:10.1017/S0266467408005488.
- Gonçalves, Eduardo G. (1997). "A New Species of Philodendron (Araceae) from Central Brazil". Kew Bulletin (Springer) 52 (2): 499–502.
- Gonçalves, Eduardo G.; Mayo, Simon J. (2000). "Philodendron venustifoliatum (Araceae): A New Species from Brazil". Kew Bulletin (Springer) 55 (2): 483–486.
- Gorchov, David L.; Cornejo, Fernando; Ascorra, Cesar F.; Jaramillo, Margarita (November 1995). "Dietary Overlap between Frugivorous Birds and Bats in the Peruvian Amazon". Oikos (Blackwell Publishing) 74 (2): 235–250.
- Gottsberger, Gerhard; Silberbauer-Gottsberger, Ilse (March 1991). "Olfactory and Visual Attraction of Erioscelis emarginata (Cyclocephalini, Dynastinae) to the Inflorescences of Philodendron selloum (Araceae)". Biotropica (The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation) 23 (1): 23–28.
- Greer, M. J. (1961). "Plant Poisonings in Cats". Modern Veterinary Practice.
- Kramer, Jack (1974). Philodendrons. Scribner. ISBN 0-684-13698-8.
- Mayo, S. J. (1990). "History and Infrageneric Nomenclature of Philodendron (Araceae)". Kew Bulletin (Springer) 45 (1): 37–71.
- Mayo, S. J. (1991). "A Revision of Philodendron Subgenus Meconostigma (Araceae)". Kew Bulletin (Springer) 46 (4): 601–681.
- McColley, R. H.; Miller, H. N. (1965). "Philodendron improvement through hybridization". Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 78: 409–415.
- McIntire, Matilda S.; Guest, James R.; Porterfield, John F. (1990). "Philodendron - an infant death". Journal of Toxicology - Clinical Toxicology 28 (2): 177–183. doi:10.3109/15563659008993490.
- Mrvos, Rita; Dean, Bonnie S.; Krenzelok, Edward P. (1991). "Philodendron/dieffenbachia ingestions: are they a problem?". Journal of Toxicology - Clinical Toxicology 29 (4): 485–491. doi:10.3109/15563659109025745.
- Murphy, Christina M.; Breed, Michael D. (2008). "Nectar and Resin Robbing in Stingless Bees". American Entomologist 54 (1): 36–44.
- Nagy, Kenneth A.; Odell, Daniel K.; Seymour, Roger S. (15 December 1972). "Temperature Regulation by the Inflorescence of Philodendron". Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 178 (4066): 1195–1197. doi:10.1126/science.178.4066.1195. PMID 17748981.
- Orihuela, Rodrigo Leonel Lozano; Waechter, Jorge Luiz (2010). "Host size and abundance of hemiepiphytes in a subtropical stand of Brazilian Atlantic Forest". Journal of Tropical Ecology (Cambridge University Press) 26 (1): 119–122. doi:10.1017/S0266467409990496.
- Pierce, J. H. (1970). "Encephalitis Signs from Philodendron Leaf". Modern Veterinary Practice.
- Plowman (1969). "Folk Uses of New World Aroids". Economic Botany (Springer) 23 (2): 97–122.
- Ray, Thomas S. (December 1990). "Metamorphosis in the Araceae". American Journal of Botany (Botanical Society of America) 77 (12): 1599–1609.
- Richard-Hansen, Cécile; Bello, Natalia; Vié, Jean-Christophe (October 1998). "Tool use by a red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus) towards a two-toed sloth (Choloepus didactylus)". Primates 39 (4): 545–548. doi:10.1007/BF02557575.
- Sakuragui, Cássia M. (2001). "Two New Species of Philodendron (Araceae) from Brazil". Novon (Missouri Botanical Garden Press) 11 (1): 102–104. ISSN 10553177.
- Schott, Heinrich Wilhelm (1832). Meletemata Botanica.
- Schott, Heinrich Wilhelm (1856). Synopsis aroidearum.
- Schott, Heinrich Wilhelm (1860). Prodromus Systematis Aroidearum.
- Sellers, Sarah J.; King, Maralee; Aronson, Carl E.; Der Marderosian, Ara H. (April 1978). "Toxicologic assessment of Philodendron oxycardium Schott (Araceae) in domestic cats". Veterinary and Human Toxicology 20 (2): 92–96. ISSN 0145-6296.
- Seymour, Roger S.; Gibernau, Marc (2008). "Respiration of thermogenic inflorescences of Philodendron melinonii: natural pattern and responses to experimental temperatures". Journal of Experimental Botany 59 (6): 1353–1362. doi:10.1093/jxb/ern042.
- Spoerke Jr., David G.; Smolinske, Susan C. (3 July 1990). Toxicity of Houseplants (1st ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-6655-0.
- Swithinbank, Anne (1 January 2005). Conservatory Gardener. New Line Books. ISBN 1-57717-195-0.
- Vieira, Emerson M.; Izar, Patrícia (1999). "Interactions between aroids and arboreal mammals in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest". Plant Ecology (Kluwer Academic Publishers) 145 (1): 75–82. doi:10.1023/A:1009859810148.
- Yu, Douglas W. (June 1994). "The Structural Role of Epiphytes in Ant Gardens". Biotropica (The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation) 26 (2): 222–226.
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!