The Sordariomycetes is one of the largest classes in the Ascomycota with more than 600 genera and 3000 known species (Kirk et al 2001). It includes most non-lichenized ascomycetes with perithecial (flask-shaped) or less frequently cleistothecial (non-ostiolate) ascomata and inoperculate unitunicate or prototunicate asci (Alexopolous et al 1996).
The term “pyrenomycetes” was used to unite fungi with perithecial ascomata and unitunicate asci (Luttrell 1951). Its use was discontinued based on the placement of perithecial species outside of the clade and the inclusion of species with prototunicate asci (e.g. Corollospora and Ophiostoma), in order to avoid confusion.
Members of the Sordariomycetes are ubiquitous and cosmopolitan and function in virtually all ecosystems as pathogens and endophytes of plants, arthropod and mammalian pathogens, mycoparasites, and saprobes involved in decomposition and nutrient cycling. The most famous members include Cryphonectria parasitica (the causal agent of chestnut blight), Magnaporthe grisea (the cause of rice blast), and Neurospora crassa (the model organism widely used in molecular and genetic studies).
The majority of Sordariomycetes produce perithecial ascomata (Figs 1,2). The shape, size, pigmentation, texture, and position of ascomata were characters used in traditional taxonomy. For example, the position of ascomata in relation to substrates was used in family delimitation of the Diaporthales by Barr (1978), but this classification was not supported by phylogenetic analyses using molecular characters (Castlebury et al 2002, Zhang and Blackwell 2001).
Figs. 1,2. From left to right, Valsella salicis. Longitudinal section of perithecia. © David Farr; Coniochaeta leucoplaca. Longitudinal section of perithecium. © Sabine M. Huhndorf
Nannfeldt (1932) and Luttrell (1951) first applied ontogenetic characters in filamentous ascomycete classification. Although the ontogenetic characters do not always correspond well with molecular phylogenies, they are still informative characters in ordinal level classification within the Sordariomycetes (Samuels and Blackwell 2001). The typical arrangement of asci in the Sordariomycetes is basal or peripheral in a hymenium (Figs 1,2). The presence or absence of an apical ring is an important feature in the Sordariomycetes classification (Fig. 3). Typically, asci of the Sordariomycetes are octosporous (Figs 4,5).
Figs. 3-5. From left to right, Jobellisia luteola. Apical ring of ascus. © Andrew Miller; Coniochaeta leucoplaca . Asci with ascospores; Lasiosphaeria ovina. Ascus with ascospores. © Sabine M. Huhndorf.
The Sordariomycetes is an anamorph-rich class, with significant diversity represented by hyphomycete and coelomycete species. Many species of the Hypocreales, Ophiostomatales, and Chaetosphaeriales have two or more distinguishable anamorphs (synanamorphs) (Figs 6-8). Hyphomycetes occur throughout the class, but coelomycete anamorphs also occur, most notably in the Glomerellaceae and Diaporthales. In common with teleomorph characters, many characters used to delimit anamorph genera (e.g. variations in conidiomata, pigmentation, conidiophore branching, and conidial septation) are homoplasic in the Sordariomycetes. Despite this, recognizable patterns of anamorph morphological characters often allow recognition of phylogenetic groups (Seifert and Gams 2001).
Figs. 6-8. Fusarium solani (teleomorph: Nectria haematococca). From left to right, macroconidia, microconidia, and clamydospores © David Geiser.
Evolution and Systematics
Discussion of Phylogenetic Relationships
In the past two decades, the classification of the Sordariomycetes has changed dramatically. Molecular phylogenetics rejected many traditional classifications especially at the subclass and ordinal levels. In the current classification sensu Hibbett et al (2007), the Sordariomycetes comprises 16 orders in three subclasses (i.e. the Hypocreomycetidae, Sordariomycetidae and Xylariomycetidae). The monophyly of the Sordariomycetes and the three subclasses were highly supported by phylogenetic analyses based on multi-gene sequences (Zhang et al. 2006).
Phylogenetic studies provide a foundation for developing hypotheses on the dynamic process of evolutionary patterns, and an insight into the long and diverse evolution of the nutritional mode/fungal symbioses in the Sordariomycetes.
A synapomorphy of the Sordariomycetes is the perithecial ascoma, which is evolved from the apothecium of ancestral Pezizomycotina (Spatafora et al. 2006). However, taxa in a number of unrelated lineages of the Sordariomycetes have lost ostioles, which is usually associated with the loss of forcible discharge of ascospores (Malloch 1981, Suh and Blackwell 1999). Most members of the Xylariomycetidae and some of the Sordariomycetidae have dark perithecia, amyloid asci, true paraphyses, and periphysate ostioles. These traits may be plesiomorphies in the Sordariomycetes, although the relationships among the three subclasses still are not confidently resolved.
The majority of members of the Sordariomycetes are terrestrial, and life in aquatic habitats is considered a derived character for the class (Samuels and Blackwell 2001). The Diaporthales, Microascales, Sordariales, Xylariales, and Magnaporthaceae contain freshwater species, while most marine species are classified in the Lulworthiales and the Halosphaeriaceae in the Microascales. Most of these fungi break down lignin and cellulose from plant debris in intertidal and subtidal zones, very rarely also in the deep sea. All the major lineages in the Sordariomycetes contain aquatic species (Shearer 1993, Spatafora et al 1998). The move to aquatic environments may have occurred multiple times in the class. The Xylariomycetidae comprises saprophytes and plant pathogens, which are also abundant in the other two subclasses. Therefore, the saprophytic and plant parasitic habits may be the ancestral states of the Sordariomycetes. Most mycoparasites and insect associates are derived from the Hypocreomycetidae, and the Sordariomycetidae is rich in coprophilous taxa.
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Statistics of barcoding coverage
Specimens with Sequences:21305
Specimens with Barcodes:18407
Species With Barcodes:5001
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!