Habitat and Ecology
Habitat and ecology
The Large Blue occurs locally on dry, open grasslands on limestone and sandy areas. It is one of the larger, more conspicuous blues. The females lay their eggs on different species of thyme (Thymus spp.), and on warmer sites also on Marjoram (Origanum vulgare). The caterpillars feed on the buds and flowers of the foodplant. After a few weeks they leave their foodplant and allow themselves to be taken by workers into the nests of any species of Myrmica ant, although over most of Europe survival is high only with Myrmica sabuleti, which must adopt at least 67% of larvae for a population to persist; in north-east Europe there is some evidence of a host switch to Myrmica lobicornis. The caterpillars feed on the ant grubs, hibernating and pupating there as well. Habitats: dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (20%), dry siliceous grasslands (15%), mesophile grasslands (9%), coniferous woodland (7%), alpine and subalpine grasslands (7%), humid grasslands and tall herb communities (7%), heath and scrub (6%).
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Barcode data: Phengaris arion
No available public DNA sequences.
Download FASTA File
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Phengaris arion
Public Records: 23
Specimens with Barcodes: 37
Species With Barcodes: 1
Barcode data: Maculinea arion
Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species.
See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.
-- end --
Download FASTA File
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Maculinea arion
Public Records: 10
Specimens with Barcodes: 15
Species With Barcodes: 1
IUCN Red List Assessment
Red List Category
Red List Criteria
- Needs updating
- 1994Endangered (E)
- 1990Vulnerable (V)
- 1988Vulnerable (V)
- 1986Vulnerable (V)
- 1983Vulnerable (V)
- "Large blue" redirects here. This can also refer to other species of Maculinea.
The large blue (Phengaris arion, also known as Maculinea arion and Glaucopsyche arion) is species of butterfly in the Lycaenidae family. The species was first defined in 1758 and first discovered in Britain in 1795. In 1979 the species went extinct in Britain but has been successfully reintroduced with new conservation methods Currently large blue is classified as "Near Threatened" on the IUCN red list of threatened species. Today P. arion can be found in Europe, the Caucasus, Armenia, West Siberia, Altai, North-West Kazakhstan and Sichuan.
The large blue can be distinguished by its unique speckled black dots on its wings with a blue background.
The large blue butterfly is well known among the behavioral ecology field as it exhibits a unique parasitic relationship with Myrmica ants, specifically with Myrmica sabuleti. The species also feeds on thyme and marjoram as food plants early on in its life cycle.
- 1 Subspecies
- 2 Description
- 3 Distribution
- 4 Host-Parasite Relationship
- 5 Behavior
- 6 Media
- 7 See also
- 8 External links
- M. a. arion Europe West Siberia, Altai, North-West Kazakhstan
- M. a. delphinatus (Fruhstorfer, 1910) "Dauphine"
- M. a. zara Jachontov, 1935 Caucasus, Armenia
- M. a. buholzeri Rezbanyai, 1978
- M. a. inferna Sibatani, Saigusa & Hirowatari, 1994 Sichuan
Large blue caterpillars are about half an inch (13 millimeters) in length and can live as long as 9 months before they form a chrysalis to become a butterfly. Large blue butterflies have a wingspan of up to 2 inches (50.8 millimeters), and will live for only a few weeks. The wings of the large blue butterfly are speckled with black dots. Compared with a large blue caterpillar, the adult's lifespan is short.
The habitat of the large blue butterfly is largely influenced by location of its food sources. The species requires a combination of abundant amounts of its larval food plant, Thymus drucei and the presence of Myrmica ants in order to survive.
It has also been found that an underlying key factor for the survival of the large blue is site heterogeneity. The butterfly is most abundant in pastures and abandoned areas of diverse vegetation and shrubbery. This preference can be explained by examining the result of a uniform landscape. A constant landscape synchronizes many biological activities including flowering of host plants, adult emergence dates, or larval pressures on the ant colonies. If important biological functions take place at the same times, the population becomes much more susceptible to random unfortunate events such as environmental disasters. Thus traditional farming acts to desynchronize the biological system, and allows for re-colonization of patches that are temporarily untouched. The presence of differing sites and varied ecological structures provides differing microclimates that can make a huge impact on the survival of the large blue butterfly.
In the late 1900s Phengaris populations began decreasing drastically throughout Europe with the large blue butterfly being particularly affected. By the 1950s only an estimated 100,000 adults remained in Britain, and by 1978 48% of the UK’s 91 known large blue populations had been lost. Initially experts were completely baffled by the disappearance of large blues as the sites did not appear to have changed. Leading hypotheses targeted collectors, insecticides, and air pollution as factors that led to the butterfly extinction. A large number of projects were conducted to combat these factors, but all were completely unsuccessful. The species became extinct in the Netherlands in 1964, in the UK in 1979 and also in Belgium in 1996. Severe decreases in population have also occurred in Denmark, Germany, France, and Estonia. The succession of extinctions and decreases in population has been characterized as a result of unsuccessful conservation efforts that stemmed from a lack of understanding of the behavior of the butterfly.
Currently the large blue butterfly is classified as critically endangered in Britain as well as being endangered in many areas of Europe. It is a priority species of under the UK Biodiversity Action Plan.
Recent findings have also shown that there is a positive correlation between large blue butterfly conservation success and that of other endangered species. One specific example is the relationship between Myrmica ants, the large blue butterfly, violet seeds, and the violet-feeding butterfly (Boloria euphrosyne). The ants will bring the violet seeds into the nest. The seeds will often germinate in the nest, and the potential for germination increases as the nest becomes deserted. Since large blue butterfly predation can lead to desertion of the nest and B. euphrosyne tend to prefer violets growing on deserted ant nests, the fitness of B. euphrosyne appears to be indirectly affected by the presence of the large blue.
Early ideas of the Phengaris-Myrmica relationship resulted in the construction of a linear relationship between one predator and one host. It was proposed that each species of Phengaris had evolutionary adapted to prey on one specific species of Myrmica with the large blue focusing on M. sabuleti. More recent reports indicate that while each Phengaris species can prey on more than one Myrmica species, that ability varies between species and each butterfly species still prefers a specific ant species. While results are not conclusive, it has been shown that the large blue strongly favors M. sabuleti but has been documented to also prey on M. scabrinodis. Studies have also shown that species of butterfly may exhibit different host preferences depending on the location. For example in Finland, large blue butterflies exclusively fed off M. lonae nests. Due to differing reports and the difficulties involved in these types of studies, the nature of the host-parasite relationship is still inconclusive.
Typical Host Plants
In the UK and in cooler or more mountainous areas in Europe, wild thyme is the food plant, marjoram being used by populations in warmer areas. Fertilized large blue females will lay their eggs only on the buds of wild thyme or marjoram, which young caterpillars feed on exclusively until after the third moult, when they are ready to seek out the appropriate ant nest. At sites where large blues occur, there is usually a high density of such nests. When the caterpillar is ready, it will drop itself off the food-plant and wait to be picked up by a passing red ant, which will then carry it to its nest. Soon after it enters the nest, the caterpillar will seek out the nesting chambers and proceed to eat red-ant eggs and larvae. When winter draws near, the large blue caterpillar begins to hibernate.
Brood Parasitic Behavior
Like many members of the genus Phengaris, large blue butterfly caterpillars exhibit a form of parasitism in which they take advantage of a host species. In this case, the hosts are specific species of the Myrmica ant. By being similar to Myrmica ants physically and chemically and possibly using other forms of mimicry, large blue caterpillars are able to trick the ants into taking them back to the ant nest. Once there, the caterpillar will either become a predator of the ant larvae or beg for food by acting like an ant larvae in what is known as a “cuckoo” strategy. Through much research, it has been well documented that large blue butterflies act as predators in the host nests. Currently, the “cuckoo” method is viewed as a more viable strategy as studies have found more larvae per nest of “cuckoo” butterflies than predator butterflies.
Female Egg-Laying Behavior
Since the parasitic-host relationship between the large blue and the Myrmica is essential for the caterpillar survival, female butterflies must lay eggs in areas where the larvae can be found by ant workers of the correct species. In the past it was unclear if Phengaris butterflies were capable of identifying areas of specific Myrmica species. It was believed that the certain species of Phengaris could detect specific odors to identify Myrmica species. It was also thought that certain species of Phengaris were capable of avoiding overcrowding on food-plants by detecting high egg loads. New studies indicate that female egg-laying is merely attuned to the Myrmica species, and that females do not take other factors into consideration.
Female Phengaris lay eggs on specific plants such as thymus. After about 3 weeks, larvae hatch to feed on the seeds and flowers of the plant. The caterpillar will stay in the vicinity of its food-plant until its 4th instar when it will drop to the ground. From there the caterpillar will adopt various strategies to be found by Myrmica ants. Several caterpillar species of Phengaris such as P. rebeli and P. alcon will secrete pheromones that are unique to their respective hosts. The purpose of such behavior is to mimic the pheromones of ant larvae that will become workers in the future. By successfully mimicking ant larvae, the caterpillars are taken back to the host nest and fed by the ants. Originally it was thought that the large blue butterfly behaves differently in that some believe it either secretes a poor pheromone mimic, or does not secrete one at all. Today it has been determined that it still secretes semio-chemicals as a form of chemical mimicry to gain acceptance into the host ant nest. Large blue caterpillars will sometimes follow ant trails or move away from the food-plant during peak-foraging time to expose themselves specifically to Myrmica and not other ants This results in workers generally ignoring the caterpillar once in the nest because it does not attract attention. The methods in which large blue caterpillars interact with the host ants are not yet known.
Behavior in the Host Nest
While most Phengaris caterpillars behave similarly prior to entering the host ant nest, once adopted by a host ant species, Phengaris butterflies adopt one of two strategies. The first more commonly studied strategy is called the “cuckoo strategy”. The cuckoo strategy has been studied extensively in P. rebeli and consists of continued interaction between the Phengaris caterpillar and the host Myrmica ants. Once in the nest, the caterpillar will use acoustic mimicry in order to further confuse the ants and hide its true identity. The large blue larvae uses the cuckoo strategy stay in close quarters with the ants and continually emit a noise very similar to that of a queen ant in order to survive. By mimicking a queen, Phengaris species that employ the cuckoo strategy are fed by the worker ants and are given preferential treatment over the ant larvae. Cuckoo strategy users become such superior members of the nest that the ants will kill their own larvae to feed to the caterpillar and will rescue the caterpillar first in the face of danger.
Unlike other members of the Phengaris genus, the large blue butterfly becomes a predator once it is in the ant nest. It feeds on the ant pupae while continuing to act as member of the Myrmica species. Even if they execute mimicry, mortality rates for the large blue within the nest are high. One explanation is that each species of Phengaris is most suited for a specific species of Myrmica. Caterpillars that are adopted by an unfamiliar species of ant are often killed and eaten. Even if they are matched with the correct host, many large blue butterflies are unable to survive. If the mimicry is not perfect and the ants become suspicious, death is highly likely. Also ants in nests without a consistent supply of food are much more likely to identify the large blue as an intruder. It has been found that large blue caterpillars are most likely to be attacked during the first 10 days after being adopted by the host ants. This is due to the fact that in this time the caterpillars become larger than the size range of the Myrmica ant larvae.
Even once Phengaris butterflies have infiltrated the host nest, they continue to hide their identity as caterpillars and will go further in their act of deception. There have been many studies documenting the use of acoustic communication in ants, and it has been found that members of the Phengaris genus exploit this behavior. For example, P. rebeli is able to mimic the unique sound of the queen in order to elevate its status in the nest. It has been shown that this mimicry can be so effective, that worker ants will rescue the P. rebeli over their own pupae in times of danger. Previously it had been thought that only the species that displayed the “cuckoo” strategy utilized acoustic mimicry. In studies, it was proven that the large blue also uses acoustic mimicry and is capable of replicating the queen’s sound as well as P. rebeli. The sound was so similar, that the sounds of the two caterpillars differed more than each did compared to the sound of the queen. It has been shown that the different Myrmica species utilize distinct semio-chemicals to distinguish themselves, but they use very similar acoustic commands once in the nest. Members of the Phengaris genus including large blue employ an extremely effective combination of mimicries. Large blue butterflies first utilize chemical mimicry to gain access to the nest and then use acoustic mimicry to elevate their status among the ants.
Lab studies and applications
Laboratory studies have shown that large blue butterflies predate the largest of the ant larvae first. This evolved tactic maximizes efficiency not only because the largest larvae provide the most substance by volume, but also because it prevents the larvae pupating and becoming inaccessible prey. Furthermore, it allows more newly hatched larvae time to grow bigger. While in the nest, large blue caterpillars acquire 99% of their final biomass, growing from an average of 1.3 mg to 173 mg. Results from laboratories estimate that 230 large larvae and a minimum of 354 Myrmica workers are needed to ensure the survival of one butterfly, however such a large nest is very rarely found in the wild. This supports findings that large blue butterflies are extremely capable of withstanding starvation. This becomes extremely beneficial in situations when the ants desert the colony and leave the caterpillar behind. Large blue butterflies have been known to be capable of migrating to new nests once the original is deserted. In many cases, a nearby colony with a fresh brood will populate the nest allowing the surviving large blues to parasitize multiple Myrmica colonies.
Cuckoo vs. Predatory Strategies
To this day, scientists are unsure why there are multiple strategies of behavior within the host nest, but a number of studies have been conducted in order to determine the effectiveness of each. The cuckoo strategy has been shown to result in six times more butterflies per nest than the predatory strategy. While this seems to indicate a dominance of the cuckoo strategy, there are other factors to consider. Since the cuckoo caterpillars remain in close vicinity of the ants, they must secrete chemicals that are almost identical to the host species in order to survive. This explains why cuckoo strategy users are more likely to be predated by the host colony when adopted by a non-primary host than predatory strategy users. Current data seems to support the idea that cuckoo strategy users depend on a specific species of Myrmica ant while predatory Phengaris are more versatile overall but still perform better with a specific species.
The Queen Effect
It has been found that large blue butterflies are three times less likely to survive in nests that have queen ants present. This discovery has been explained with a theory called the “queen effect”. In most Myrmica nests, the queen ant will lay two main batches of eggs, and the females that hatch from these eggs will either become workers or virgin queens. Whether these females become workers or virgin queens is dependent on the status of the queen in the nest. If the queen dies, worker ants will have the largest of the female larvae transition into virgin queens. If the queen is present and healthy, she will influence the nurse workers to neglect, starve and bite the female larvae which results in restricted growth and aids in the transition to workers. This indicates that Phengaris butterflies must maintain a strict balance between mimicking the queen in the presence of workers and appearing to be a worker to avoid the queen.
- Eeles, Peter. "Large Blue". Retrieved 15 November 2013.
- "Large Blue (Phengaris (Maculinea) arion)". Retrieved 15 November 2013.
- "Phegaris arion". Retrieved 15 November 2013.
- "Large Blue Butterflies".
- Muggleton, John; Brian Benham (1975). "Isolation and the decline of the large blue butterfly (Maculinea arion) in Great Britain". Biological Conservation 7 (2): 119–128. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(75)90051-8.
- Wynhoff, Irma (1998). "The recent distribution of the European Maculinea species". Journal of Insect Conservation 2: 15–27.
- Spitzer, L.; J. Benes; J. Dandova; V. Jaskova; M. Konvicka (2009). "The Large Blue butterﬂy, Phengaris [Maculinea] arion, as a conservation umbrella on a landscape scale: The case of the Czech Carpathians". Ecological Indicators 9: 1056–1063. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.12.006.
- Hanski, L. (1999). Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Davies, Z.G.; R.J. Wilson, S. Coles, C.D. Thomas, (2006). "Changing habitat associations of a thermally constrained species, the silver-spotted skipper butterﬂy, in response to climate warming". Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 247–256. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01044.x.
- Thomas, J.A. (1980). "Why did the large blue become extinct in Britain?". Oryx 15: 243–247. doi:10.1017/s0030605300024625.
- Thomas, J.A. (1995). "The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of large blue butterfly". Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies: 180–197.
- Thomas, J.A. (1991). Rare species conservation: case studies of European Butterflies. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publication.
- Fox, R.; M.S. Warren, T.M. Brereton, D.B. Roy, A. Robinson (2011). "A new red list of British butterflies". Insect Conservation and Diversity 4. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00117.x.
- Guillem, R.M. (2012). "Corrigendum to "Using chemo-taxonomy of host ants to help conserve the large blue butterfly"". Biol. Conserv. 148: 39–43.
- Randle, Z.; D.J. Simcox, K. Schronrogge, J.C. Wardlaw, J.A. Thomas (2005). "Myrmica ants as keystone species and Maculinea arionas an indicator of rare niches in UKgrasslands".
- Witek, Magdalena; EWA B. ĝLIWIēSKA1 , PIOTR SKÓRKA2 , PIOTR NOWICKI1 , MARTA WANTUCH1 , VLADIMÍR VRABEC3 , JOSEF SETTELE4 and MICHAL WOYCIECHOWSKI (2008). "Host ant specificity of large blue butterflies Phengaris (Maculinea) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inhabiting humid grasslands in East-central Europe". European Journal of Entomology 105: 871–877. doi:10.14411/eje.2008.115.
- Sielezniew, Marcin; Anna M. Stankiewicz (2008). "Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) not necessary for the survival of the population of Phengaris (Maculinea) arion (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in eastern Poland: Lower host-ant specificity or evidence for geographical variation of an endangered social parasite?". European Journal of Entomology 105: 637–641. doi:10.14411/eje.2008.086.
- "Large Blue Butterflies". Retrieved 15 November 2013.
- Sielezniew, Marcin; Dario Patricelli, Izabela Dziekańska, Francesca Barbero, Simona Bonelli, Luca Pietro Casacci , Magdalena Witek & Emilio Balletto (2010). "The First Record of Myrmica lonae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as a Host of the Socially Parasitic Large Blue Butterfly Phengaris (Maculinea)* arion(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)". Sociobiology 56: 465–475.
- Thomas, Jeremy; Karsten Schönrogge, Simona Bonelli, Francesca Barbero and Emilio Balletto (2010). "Corruption of ant acoustical signals by mimetic social parasites". Communicative and Integrative Biology 3 (2): 169–171. doi:10.4161/cib.3.2.10603. PMC 2889977. PMID 20585513.
- Pech, Pavel; Zdenek Fric; Martin Konvicka; Jan Zrzavy (2004). "Phylogeny of Maculinea blues (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) based on morphological and ecological characters: evolution of parasitic myrmecophily". Cladistics 20 (4): 362–375. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00031.x.
- Als, Thomas; Roger Vila, Nikolai P. Kandul, David R. Nash, Shen-Horn Yen, Yu-Feng Hsu, André A. Mignault, Jacobus J. Boomsma & Naomi E. Pierce (2004). "The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in large blue butterflies". Nature 432: 386–390. doi:10.1038/nature03020.
- Thomas, J.A.; G.W. Elmes (2001). "Food–plant niche selection rather than the presence of ant nests explains oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous butterfly genus Maculinea". Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 471–477. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1398.
- Thomas, J.A.; D.J. Simcox, J.C. Wardlaw, G.W. Elmes, M.E. Hochberg and R.T. Clarke (1997). "Effects of latitude, altitude and climate on the habitat and conservation of the endangered butterﬂy Maculinea arion and its Myrmica ant hosts". Journal of Insect Conservation 2: 39–46.
- Thomas, J.A.; J.C. Wardlaw (1990). "The effect of queen ants on the survival of Maculinea arion larvae in Myrmica ant nests". Oecologia 85: 87–91. doi:10.1007/bf00317347.
- Thomas, J. (2002). "Larval niche selection and evening exposure enhance adoption of a predacious social parasite, Maculinea arion (large blue butterfly), by Myrmica ants". Oecologia 132 (4): 531–537. doi:10.1007/s00442-002-1002-9.
- DeVries, P.J.; R.B. Cocroft, J.A. Thomas (1993). "Comparison of acoustical signals in Maculinea butterfly caterpillars and their obligate host Myrmica ants". Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 49: 229–238. doi:10.1006/bijl.1993.1033.
- Cobb, Matthew (2009). "Caterpillars make noises like ants". J. Exp. Biol. 212.
- Settele, Josef; Francesca Barbero, Martin Musche, Jeremy A. Thomas and Karsten Schönrogge (2011). "Singing the blues: from experimental biology to conservation application". J. Exp. Biol. 214: 1407–1410. doi:10.1242/jeb.035329.
- Barbero, Francesca; Jeremy A Thomas; Simona Bonelli; Emilio Balletto; Karsten Schönrogge (2009). Science 323: 782–785. doi:10.1126/science.1163583. Missing or empty
- Thomas, J.A. (1992). "The capacity of a Myrmica ant nest to support a predacious species of Maculinea butterfly". Oecologia 91: 101–109. doi:10.1007/BF00317247.
- Thomas, Jeremy; Josef Settele (2004). "Evolutionary biology: Butterfly mimics of ants". Nature 432: 283–284. Bibcode:2004Natur.432..283T. doi:10.1038/432283a.
- Reader's Digest, The Wildlife Year, p 190, ISBN 0-276-42012-8.
- Gimenez Dixon (1996). "Maculinea arion". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Retrieved May 9, 2006.