IUCN threat status:

Endangered (EN)

Comprehensive Description

Read full entry

[[ The northern river shark Glyphis sp. C ]]

The northern river shark Glyphis sp. C (see Fig. 2) is a cryptic carcharhinid that was previously known from only three specimens from the Fly River in Papua New Guinea and five specimens from the Adelaide and East Alligator rivers in the Northern Territory of Australia (Taniuchi et al. 1991; Compagno & Niem 1998; Larson 2000).

Only two species of Glyphis ZBK have been recorded in Australian river systems, these being Glyphis sp. A and C , however, the number of congeners that exist worldwide is uncertain, with a lack of specimens hindering the formal description of three of the four or five species within the genus, i.e. Glyphis sp. A , Glyphis sp. B and Glyphis sp. C . The genus is distinguished by a second dorsal fin height between one half and three fifths that of the first (Last & Stevens 1994), and the possession of non-crescentic, longitudinal precaudal pits (Compagno & Niem 1998). Glyphis sp. C is differentiated from Glyphis sp. A and B by a lower vertebral count (147-148 cf 198-217) and lower diplospondylous caudal centra (65-68 cf 85-93) (Compagno & Niem 1998).

In June 2002, a single specimen of Glyphis sp. C was collected by one of the authors whilst sampling for barramundi Lates calcarifer (Bloch , 1790) in a macrotidal mangrove system north of Derby (Doctors Creek) (Morgan et al. 2004). This capture was previously reported by Pogonoski and Pollard (2003) as being from the Fitzroy River. As a consequence of this enigmatic occurrence, funding was sought from Environment Australia to establish whether this endangered (as listed in the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999), or critically endangered (as listed in Pogonoski & Pollard 2003) species, is well represented in the area.

Materials and Methods

In June 2003, seven sites were sampled in macrotidal mangrove areas in King Sound including, and adjacent to, Doctors Creek (Fig. 1), using a selection of monofilament gill nets and baited lines. Three sites in the lower Fitzroy River (the nearest major river system) were also sampled. On each sampling occasion the salinity and temperature were recorded. Habitat parameters such as tidal movement, water clarity (secchi) and depth were also collected.

The total length (TL) (mm), weight (g), and height of the first and second dorsal fins (mm) were recorded for each specimen. In addition, six specimens were X-rayed and one was dissected to determine their vertebral count. In males, maturation was determined by the development and level of calcification of the claspers, while the maturity of the largest female specimen was determined via dissection, using the criteria described by Conrath (2004), relating to the condition of ova in the ovary, and the developmental stage of the oviduct.

Results

Distribution and habitat. In addition to the first specimen caught in 2002 (WAM P.32597.001) (Morgan et al. 2002; Morgan et al. 2004), six Glyphis sp. C were captured from two of the seven macrotidal marine sites sampled (WAM P.32598.001, WAM P.32599.001, WAM P.32600.001 four individuals) (Table 1, Figs. 1 & 2). None was captured in the Fitzroy River. The original specimen, a semi-mature male measuring 994 mm TL (Table 1, Fig. 3), was captured at the entrance of a small tributary in the northern branch of Doctors Creek. A further two specimens (WAM P.32598.001, WAM P.32599.001) were captured at this site during this study, with the remaining four being captured at the mouth of another small tributary approximately 20 km south of the mouth of Doctors Creek (Fig. 1). Both sites were macrotidal (with tidal movements of up to 10 m twice daily), dominated by mangroves and had salinities between 32.0 and 36.6 parts per thousand (ppt). Water temperatures at the collection sites were between 22 and 23°C. Sites were typified by low water clarity with secchi depths of only 3 to 4 cm. All specimens were captured during the outgoing tide.

Morphology. Of the seven Glyphis sp. C collected, five were male, ranging in length from 906 to 1418 mm TL, and weighed between 5150 and 18640 g, while the two female specimens were 957 and 1350 mm TL, and weighed 5970 and 16830 g, respectively (Table 1). The mean ratio of the height of the second dorsal fin to the first dorsal fin of the six specimens collected during 2003 was 0.62 (± 0.01 S.E.), and ranged from 0.58 to 0.66; their mean eye diameter was 0.87 % (± 0.04 S.E.) of total length, and ranged from 0.77 to 1.03 %. Only the largest male (1418 mm TL) was mature (claspers fully calcified), while the largest females were immature. The 994 mm TL specimen collected in 2002 had semicalcified claspers, indicating that maturation had not yet been obtained.

Vertebral counts ranged between 140 and 151, with a mean of 146 (± 1.53 S.E.) (Table 1). Fusion of vertebrae and spinal deformation was present in the first specimen caught (Fig. 3) and also in the largest male and largest female collected during June 2003. A count (total) of the number of diplospondylous caudal centra for all the specimens ranged from 64 to 70.

Diet. X-rays revealed that the stomachs of three of the five specimens contained forktailed catfishes (likely Arius graeffei Kner and Steindachner ZBK , 1867), identifiable by their barbed spines and distinctive head shield of the upper skull. The stomach of the dissected female contained a large piece of threadfin salmon Polydactylus macrochir ( Guenther , 1867).

Discussion

The results of this study suggest that the tidal creeks of King Sound, including Doctors Creek, may be an important habitat for the (critically) endangered Glyphis sp. C , with these specimens representing almost half of all those known. Although this rarity may reflect a paucity of ichthyological exploration of the remote Kimberley region of Western Australia, it should be noted that the species was not encountered during an elasmobranch survey of 160 sites throughout 39 river/creek systems of northern Australia, including 12 river/creek systems in the Kimberley (Thorburn et al. 2003). This species, as its common name implies, was previously only known from riverine habitats with salinities ranging from 2 to 26 ppt (Larson 2000). During this study, however, it was only encountered in macrotidal marine conditions (32 to 36.6 ppt). Additionally, this species was not captured during an extensive study of the fish fauna at 70 sites in the freshwaters of the Fitzroy River (Morgan et al. 2002, 2004), which drains into King Sound, has a catchment of almost 90 000 km2 and has the highest recorded runoff of any river in Western Australia (Anon. 1993, Storey 1998). Furthermore, studies of Kimberley rivers by Allen (1975), Hutchins (1977, 1981) and Allen and Leggett (1990) did not record Glyphis sp. C .

Glyphis sp. C collected in Western Australia have both a wider range in total vertebral count (i.e. 140-151 cf 147-148) and number of diplospondylous caudal centra (i.e. 64-70 cf 65-68) than that previously reported by Compagno & Niem (1998). The extension in range of total vertebrae and diplospondylous caudal centra can most likely be attributed to the few specimens upon which previous counts were made. The length range of the animals captured, combined with maturity data suggest that they attain sexual maturity when>1350 mm TL, at least, for females, and between 1191 and 1418 mm TL for males (Table 1). The original specimen collected in 2002 (994 mm TL), although shorter than the second largest male collected in June 2003, was found to be semi-mature. This maturity at a shorter length is likely to be attributed to its severe deformity, and the length may not be representative for an animal of similar age.

The occurrence of spinal deformations in three of the seven specimens collected from King Sound may also provide insight into the size of the Glyphis sp. C population in King Sound. Heupal et al. (1999) reports that spinal deformities in elasmobranchs are rare, with only a few cases of individuals of several species noted. The cause of the deformities is often unknown, but Heupal et al. (1999) attributes them to parasitic infection, arthritis, injury, disease, tumours, malnutrition or genetic abnormality. Considering the high occurrence of this deformity, with almost half of those collected from King Sound possessing some degree of vertebral fusing, it is possible that the malformations are caused by a genetic abnormality, indicative of inbreeding within a small gene pool. Skeletal deformities as a result of inbreeding have been observed in hatchery reared fishes (Tave 1986), and other vertebrates, including humans (Jones 1996).

Glyphis sp. C possesses at least several morphological characters that may be reflective of this species persistence in the highly turbid macrotidal environment of King Sound, and indeed the rivers of the Northern Territory and Papua New Guinea. These include: a reduced eye (an average of 0.87 % of the total length) which is approximately half the eye diameter of the bull shark Carcharhinus leucas (Carcharhinidae) (Taniuchi et al. 1991), a species known to enter freshwater rivers including the Fitzroy River (Thorburn et al. 2003); the occurrence of a large number of sensory ampullae covering the head (Fig. 4), which would compensate for any lack in visual capacity that this species may encounter while foraging in turbid waters; and the possession of large pectoral fins (and second dorsal fin) would assist in the motility and stability of this species in the shallow rapid flowing waters of King Sound (and rivers).

The feeder creeks of King Sound, and in particular those of the macrotidal Doctors Creek and Fitzroy River mouth, may be an important refuge for Glyphis sp. C . Furthermore, molecular data need to be collected in order to determine their population structure within King Sound, and the relationship of this population with those elsewhere in the Australian-New Guinean region.

Trusted

Public Domain

MagnoliaPress via Plazi

Source: Plazi.org

Belongs to 0 communities

This taxon hasn't been featured in any communities yet.

Learn more about Communities

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!