Overview
Brief Summary
Biology
zooxanthellate
-
UNESCO-IOC Register of Marine Organisms
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=1318
Trusted
Comprehensive Description
Biology: Skeleton
More info
| Author | Skeleton? | Mineral or Organic? | Mineral | Percent Magnesium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cairns, Hoeksema, and van der Land, 1999 | YES | MINERAL | ARAGONITE | |
| Yabe and Sugiyama, 1935 | YES | MINERAL | ARAGONITE | |
| Yabe, Sugiyama, and Eguchi, 1936 | YES | MINERAL | ARAGONITE | |
| Faustino, 1927 | YES | MINERAL | ARAGONITE |
Trusted
Distribution
Range Description
In the Indo-West Pacific, this species is found in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, the southwest and central Indian Ocean, the central Indo-Pacific, tropical Australia, southern Japan and the South China Sea, the oceanic West Pacific.
Trusted
Chagos, Indo-West Pacific, Mauritius, Mozambique, Red Sea, Seychelles, Somalia, South Africa (country)
-
UNESCO-IOC Register of Marine Organisms
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=1318
-
Vine, P. (1986). Red Sea Invertebrates. Immel Publishing, London. 224 pp.
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=5987
-
Sheppard, C.R.C. (1998). Corals of the Indian Ocean: a taxonomic and distribution database for coral reef ecologists
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=6092
-
Fauré, G. (1977). Annotated checklist of the corals in the Mascarene Archipelago, Indian Ocean. Atoll Research Bulletin 203: 1-26
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=5899
-
Best, W.G., G. Faure & M. Pichon (1980). Contribution to the knowledge of the stony corals from the Seychelles and Eastern Africa. Rev. Zool. Afr. 94,3: 600 - 627.
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=6043
-
Schleyer, M.H. (1995). South African coral reef communities. In: Cowan G.I. (ed) Wetlands of South Africa. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria.
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=6220
Trusted
Physical Description
Diagnostic Description
Description
This species is the less common of the two, but is widely distributed. Branches of Seriatopora caliendrum are usually considerably thicker than those of S. hystrix, and may be fairly straight. Calices commonly have hoods, so that on thicker branched colonies there is a very close resemblance to slender Stylophora pistillata from sheltered water. However, calices of Seriatopora caliendrum run in rows and are oval. It is not a common species, but is found on reef slopes between the surface and 25 m deep. It prefers sheltered water, and is more common on back reef than fore reef areas (Sheppard, 1998). Branches do not taper, they may be widely spaced or compact. Corallites tend to have a Stylophora-like hood. Colour: cream or brown. Abundance: uncommon except on some upper reef slopes (Veron, 1986).
-
Veron, J.E.N. & M. Pichon (1976). Scleractinia of Eastern Australia. Part I. Families Thamnasteriidae, Astroceoniidae, Pocilloporidae. Australian Institute of Marine Science Monograph Series. Volume I.
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=5912
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Habitat and Ecology
Habitat and Ecology
Systems
It is found mostly on upper reef slopes. The maximum size is 20 cm across. This species is found to 40 m.
Systems
- Marine
Trusted
Depth range based on 29 specimens in 1 taxon.
Water temperature and chemistry ranges based on 10 samples.
Environmental ranges
Depth range (m): 2 - 13
Temperature range (°C): 25.480 - 28.867
Nitrate (umol/L): 0.119 - 0.528
Salinity (PPS): 34.449 - 35.198
Oxygen (ml/l): 4.606 - 4.663
Phosphate (umol/l): 0.081 - 0.171
Silicate (umol/l): 1.017 - 1.999
Graphical representation
Depth range (m): 2 - 13
Temperature range (°C): 25.480 - 28.867
Nitrate (umol/L): 0.119 - 0.528
Salinity (PPS): 34.449 - 35.198
Oxygen (ml/l): 4.606 - 4.663
Phosphate (umol/l): 0.081 - 0.171
Silicate (umol/l): 1.017 - 1.999
Note: this information has not been validated. Check this *note*. Your feedback is most welcome.
Water temperature and chemistry ranges based on 10 samples.
Environmental ranges
Depth range (m): 2 - 13
Temperature range (°C): 25.480 - 28.867
Nitrate (umol/L): 0.119 - 0.528
Salinity (PPS): 34.449 - 35.198
Oxygen (ml/l): 4.606 - 4.663
Phosphate (umol/l): 0.081 - 0.171
Silicate (umol/l): 1.017 - 1.999
Graphical representation
Depth range (m): 2 - 13
Temperature range (°C): 25.480 - 28.867
Nitrate (umol/L): 0.119 - 0.528
Salinity (PPS): 34.449 - 35.198
Oxygen (ml/l): 4.606 - 4.663
Phosphate (umol/l): 0.081 - 0.171
Silicate (umol/l): 1.017 - 1.999
Note: this information has not been validated. Check this *note*. Your feedback is most welcome.
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Molecular Biology
Barcode data: Seriatopora caliendrum
The following is a representative barcode sequence, the centroid of all available sequences for this species.

There are 2 barcode sequences available from BOLD and GenBank. Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species. See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.
Download FASTA File
There are 2 barcode sequences available from BOLD and GenBank. Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species. See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.
ATTCGATGGGTTTTTTCAACCAATCATAAAGATATCGGTAGTTTGTATCTAATTTTTGGTGGGGGTGCTGGTTTAATCGGGACGGCRTTT---AGTATGCTTATACGACTCGAGCTTTCTGCGCCCGGAGCGATGTTAGGAGAT---GATCATCTTTATAATGTAATTGTTACAGCACATGCTTTTATTATGATTTTTTTTTTGGTTATGCCRGTTATGATTGGGGGGYTTGGTAATTGATTGGTCCCATTA---TATATTGGGGCGCCGGATATGGCGTTTCCCCGACTAAACAATATTAGTTTTTGACTYTTGCCCCCTGCGCTTTTTTTATTATTAGGCTCTGCTTTTATTGAACAAGGGGCGGGGACGGGGTGAACAGTTTATCCTCCTCTTGCTAGTATTCAAGCACACTCCGGAGGTTCGGTTGATATG---GTTATTTTTAGTCTTCATTTAGCTGGGGTTTCTTCTATTTTAGGTGCTATAAACTTTATTACTACAATTTTAAATATGCGAGCCCCGGGTGTGTCTTTTAATAAACTACCTTTATTTGTTTGATCTATTTTAATAACAGCTTTTTTATTGCTTTTATCTTTACCTGTTTTAGCTGGT---GCTATTACTATGTTGTTAACAGATAGAAACTTTAATACGACTTTTTTCGATCCAGCGGGTGGCGGGGACCCAATATTATTTCAGCATCTATTTTGATTCTTTGGGCATCCAGAAGTTTATATTTTAATTTTGCCTGGTTTTGGTATGATTTCTCAAATAATCCCGACTTTTGTTGCTAAAAAA---CAAGTTTTCGGGTATTTAGGAATGGTTTATGCCATGCTTTCTATTGGGCTTCTGGGATTTATTGTTTGAGCTCATCATATGTTTACTGTTGGGATGGATGTAGATACAAGAGCATATTTTACTGCTGCTACTATGRTTATTGCTGTGCCAACTGGGATTAAAGTTTTTAGTTGGTTG---GCAACT
-- end --
-- end --
Download FASTA File
Trusted
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Seriatopora caliendrum
Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 2
Specimens with Barcodes: 3
Species With Barcodes: 1
Public Records: 2
Specimens with Barcodes: 3
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Genomic DNA is available from 1 specimen with morphological vouchers housed at Queensland Museum
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
IUCN Red List Assessment
Red List Category
NT
Near Threatened
Red List Criteria
Version
3.1
Year Assessed
2008
Assessor/s
Hoeksema, B., Rogers, A. & Quibilan, M.
Reviewer/s
Livingstone, S., Polidoro, B. & Smith, J. (Global Marine Species Assessment)
Contributor/s
Justification
The most important known threat for this species is extensive reduction of coral reef habitat due to a combination of threats. Specific population trends are unknown but population reduction can be inferred from estimated habitat loss (Wilkinson 2004). It is widespread and uncommon throughout its range and therefore is likely to be more resilient to habitat loss and reef degradation because of an assumed large effective population size that is highly connected and/or stable with enhanced genetic variability. Therefore, the estimated habitat loss of 21% from reefs already destroyed within its range is the best inference of population reduction since it may survive in coral reefs already at the critical stage of degradation (Wilkinson 2004). This inference of population reduction over three generation lengths (15 years) does not meet the threshold of a threat category. However, since this population reduction estimate is close to a threatened threshold, and because this species is moderately susceptible to a number of threats, it is likely to be one of the species lost on some reefs currently at the critical stage of degradation and therefore is Near Threatened. Predicted threats from climate change and ocean acidification make it important to reassess this species in 10 years or sooner, particularly if the species is actually observed to disappear from reefs currently at the critical stage of reef degradation.
Trusted
Trends
Population
Population
Population Trend
This species is uncommon and locally common.
There is no species specific population information available for this species. However, there is evidence that overall coral reef habitat has declined, and this is used as a proxy for population decline for this species. This species is more resilient to some of the threats faced by corals and therefore population decline is estimated using the percentage of destroyed reefs only (Wilkinson 2004). We assume that most, if not all, mature individuals will be removed from a destroyed reef and that on average, the number of individuals on reefs are equal across its range and proportional to the percentage of destroyed reefs. Reef losses throughout the species' range have been estimated over three generations, two in the past and one projected into the future.
The age of first maturity of most reef building corals is typically three to eight years (Wallace 1999) and therefore we assume that average age of mature individuals is greater than eight years. Furthermore, based on average sizes and growth rates, we assume that average generation length is 10 years, unless otherwise stated. Total longevity is not known, but likely to be more than ten years. Therefore any population decline rates for the Red List assessment are measured over at least 30 years. Follow the link below for further details on population decline and generation length estimates.
There is no species specific population information available for this species. However, there is evidence that overall coral reef habitat has declined, and this is used as a proxy for population decline for this species. This species is more resilient to some of the threats faced by corals and therefore population decline is estimated using the percentage of destroyed reefs only (Wilkinson 2004). We assume that most, if not all, mature individuals will be removed from a destroyed reef and that on average, the number of individuals on reefs are equal across its range and proportional to the percentage of destroyed reefs. Reef losses throughout the species' range have been estimated over three generations, two in the past and one projected into the future.
The age of first maturity of most reef building corals is typically three to eight years (Wallace 1999) and therefore we assume that average age of mature individuals is greater than eight years. Furthermore, based on average sizes and growth rates, we assume that average generation length is 10 years, unless otherwise stated. Total longevity is not known, but likely to be more than ten years. Therefore any population decline rates for the Red List assessment are measured over at least 30 years. Follow the link below for further details on population decline and generation length estimates.
Population Trend
Unknown
Trusted
Threats
Major Threats
The total number of corals (live and raw) exported for this species in 2005 was 656.
In general, the major threat to corals is global climate change, in particular, temperature extremes leading to bleaching and increased susceptibility to disease, increased severity of ENSO events and storms, and ocean acidification.
Coral disease has emerged as a serious threat to coral reefs worldwide and a major cause of reef deterioration (Weil et al. 2006). The numbers of diseases and coral species affected, as well as the distribution of diseases have all increased dramatically within the last decade (Porter et al. 2001, Green and Bruckner 2000, Sutherland et al. 2004, Weil 2004). Coral disease epizootics have resulted in significant losses of coral cover and were implicated in the dramatic decline of acroporids in the Florida Keys (Aronson and Precht 2001, Porter et al. 2001, Patterson et al. 2002). In the Indo-Pacific, disease is also on the rise with disease outbreaks recently reported from the Great Barrier Reef (Willis et al. 2004), Marshall Islands (Jacobson 2006) and the northwestern Hawaiian Islands (Aeby 2006). Increased coral disease levels on the GBR were correlated with increased ocean temperatures (Willis et al. 2007) supporting the prediction that disease levels will be increasing with higher sea surface temperatures. Escalating anthropogenic stressors combined with the threats associated with global climate change of increases in coral disease, frequency and duration of coral bleaching and ocean acidification place coral reefs in the Indo-Pacific at high risk of collapse.
Localized threats to corals include fisheries, human development (industry, settlement, tourism, and transportation), changes in native species dynamics (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), invasive species (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), dynamite fishing, chemical fishing, pollution from agriculture and industry, domestic pollution, sedimentation, and human recreation and tourism activities.
The severity of these combined threats to the global population of each individual species is not known.
In general, the major threat to corals is global climate change, in particular, temperature extremes leading to bleaching and increased susceptibility to disease, increased severity of ENSO events and storms, and ocean acidification.
Coral disease has emerged as a serious threat to coral reefs worldwide and a major cause of reef deterioration (Weil et al. 2006). The numbers of diseases and coral species affected, as well as the distribution of diseases have all increased dramatically within the last decade (Porter et al. 2001, Green and Bruckner 2000, Sutherland et al. 2004, Weil 2004). Coral disease epizootics have resulted in significant losses of coral cover and were implicated in the dramatic decline of acroporids in the Florida Keys (Aronson and Precht 2001, Porter et al. 2001, Patterson et al. 2002). In the Indo-Pacific, disease is also on the rise with disease outbreaks recently reported from the Great Barrier Reef (Willis et al. 2004), Marshall Islands (Jacobson 2006) and the northwestern Hawaiian Islands (Aeby 2006). Increased coral disease levels on the GBR were correlated with increased ocean temperatures (Willis et al. 2007) supporting the prediction that disease levels will be increasing with higher sea surface temperatures. Escalating anthropogenic stressors combined with the threats associated with global climate change of increases in coral disease, frequency and duration of coral bleaching and ocean acidification place coral reefs in the Indo-Pacific at high risk of collapse.
Localized threats to corals include fisheries, human development (industry, settlement, tourism, and transportation), changes in native species dynamics (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), invasive species (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), dynamite fishing, chemical fishing, pollution from agriculture and industry, domestic pollution, sedimentation, and human recreation and tourism activities.
The severity of these combined threats to the global population of each individual species is not known.
Trusted
Management
Conservation Actions
Conservation Actions
All corals are listed on CITES Appendix II. Parts of the species’ range fall within Marine Protected Areas.
Recommended measures for conserving this species include research in taxonomy, population, abundance and trends, ecology and habitat status, threats and resilience to threats, restoration action; identification, establishment and management of new protected areas; expansion of protected areas; recovery management; and disease, pathogen and parasite management. Artificial propagation and techniques such as cryo-preservation of gametes may become important for conserving coral biodiversity.
Having timely access to national-level trade data for CITES analysis reports would be valuable for monitoring trends this species. The species is targeted by collectors for the aquarium trade and fisheries management is required for the species, e.g., MPAs, quotas, size limits, etc. Consideration of the suitability of species for aquaria should also be included as part of fisheries management, and population surveys should be carried out to monitor the effects of harvesting. Recommended conservation measures include population surveys to monitor the effects of collecting for the aquarium trade, especially in Indonesia.
Recommended measures for conserving this species include research in taxonomy, population, abundance and trends, ecology and habitat status, threats and resilience to threats, restoration action; identification, establishment and management of new protected areas; expansion of protected areas; recovery management; and disease, pathogen and parasite management. Artificial propagation and techniques such as cryo-preservation of gametes may become important for conserving coral biodiversity.
Having timely access to national-level trade data for CITES analysis reports would be valuable for monitoring trends this species. The species is targeted by collectors for the aquarium trade and fisheries management is required for the species, e.g., MPAs, quotas, size limits, etc. Consideration of the suitability of species for aquaria should also be included as part of fisheries management, and population surveys should be carried out to monitor the effects of harvesting. Recommended conservation measures include population surveys to monitor the effects of collecting for the aquarium trade, especially in Indonesia.
Trusted


