The Newsfeed for this EOL Taxon Page gathers updates associated with items shown on it, including curator actions and comments from EOL users.

Add a new comment

Newsfeed

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn commented on an older version of Biology:

    As comments. Major source of error is that the natural mating period is in the winter/spring (approx Nov-March). Also age of maturity speculative and most likely an underestimate

    almost 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn commented on an older version of Biology:

    Again, some information here is not well researched. The mating period is in the winter and spring (approx Nov-March), males will moult to maturity in the previous autumn. The age of maturity is rather speculative, and later maturity of both sexes is common in captive specimens. Also, the urticating hairs will not necessarily cause blindness, this is too sensationalised, but can lead to chronic irritation. Contact with skin normally causes itching for a few hours to a couple of days.

    almost 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn commented on an older version of Range:

    Though the source (5=Rick West 2005) indeed reports the species ranges inland to the states of Mexico and Morelos, the presence in those states should be considered highly doubtful. I have reviewed museum specimens from many other locations, conducted fieldwork, and contacted other sources of collection localities (including West himself), and see no evidence to support the spurious assertion, so consider their speculative presence in Morelos and Mexico states as unfounded.

    almost 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn commented on an older version of Geographic Range:

    Only the first part is correct, central pacific coastal mexico, which is mostly scrub-thorn forest. They do NOT occur in rainforest, and they certainly NOT are endemic to USA or Panama. The first cited source is an unreliable webpage, which now is not functional, the second source is a credible reference that only cites the species as endemic to pacific coastal Mexico

    almost 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn marked "Geographic Range" as untrusted on the "Brachypelma smithi" page.
    Reasons to untrust: incorrect/misleading

    almost 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn commented on an older version of Geographic Range:

    This comment was deleted.

    almost 3 years ago • deleted: over 2 years ago

  • Profile picture of Bob Corrigan who took this action.

    Bob Corrigan commented on "Image of Brachypelma smithi":

    Roger, you are made of stronger stuff than I am. Thanks for the photo.

    almost 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Roger Pester who took this action.

    Roger Pester commented on "Image of Brachypelma smithi":

    I have just required one of these beautiful looking tarantulas and this is one lovely looking specimen.Great looking condition and colour.Main is only a inch long at this moment she or he is 2 years old.

    almost 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on an older version of Reproduction:

    There's something wrong with the HTML in this article. It looks like there's an unclosed italics tag somewhere.

    almost 3 years ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz added the English common name "Desert Blond Tarantula" to "Aphonopelma chalcodes Chamberlin, 1940".

    about 3 years ago

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!