The Newsfeed for this EOL Taxon Page gathers updates associated with items shown on it, including curator actions and comments from EOL users.

Add a new comment

Newsfeed

  • Profile picture of Caroline Kryder who took this action.

    Caroline Kryder set an older version of "Image" as an exemplar on "Brachypelma smithi (F. O. P.-Cambridge, 1897)".

    10 days ago

  • Profile picture of Caroline Kryder who took this action.
  • Profile picture of Caroline Kryder who took this action.
  • Profile picture of Bob Corrigan who took this action.

    Bob Corrigan added the common name "Goliath birdeater" to "Theraphosa blondi (Latreille, 1804)".

    4 months ago

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn marked an older version of "Biology" as untrusted on the "Brachypelma smithi" page.
    Reasons to untrust: incorrect/misleading

    6 months ago

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn commented on an older version of "Biology":

    As comments. Major source of error is that the natural mating period is in the winter/spring (approx Nov-March). Also age of maturity speculative and most likely an underestimate

    6 months ago

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn commented on an older version of "Biology":

    Again, some information here is not well researched. The mating period is in the winter and spring (approx Nov-March), males will moult to maturity in the previous autumn. The age of maturity is rather speculative, and later maturity of both sexes is common in captive specimens. Also, the urticating hairs will not necessarily cause blindness, this is too sensationalised, but can lead to chronic irritation. Contact with skin normally causes itching for a few hours to a couple of days.

    6 months ago

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn commented on an older version of "Range":

    Though the source (5=Rick West 2005) indeed reports the species ranges inland to the states of Mexico and Morelos, the presence in those states should be considered highly doubtful. I have reviewed museum specimens from many other locations, conducted fieldwork, and contacted other sources of collection localities (including West himself), and see no evidence to support the spurious assertion, so consider their speculative presence in Morelos and Mexico states as unfounded.

    6 months ago

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn commented on an older version of "Geographic Range":

    Only the first part is correct, central pacific coastal mexico, which is mostly scrub-thorn forest. They do NOT occur in rainforest, and they certainly NOT are endemic to USA or Panama. The first cited source is an unreliable webpage, which now is not functional, the second source is a credible reference that only cites the species as endemic to pacific coastal Mexico

    7 months ago

  • Profile picture of Stuart Longhorn who took this action.

    Stuart Longhorn marked an older version of "Geographic Range" as untrusted on the "Brachypelma smithi" page.
    Reasons to untrust: incorrect/misleading

    7 months ago

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!