The following bibliography has been generated by bringing together all references provided by our content partners. There may be duplication.

References

  • Akam, M. 2000. Arthropods: Developmental diversity within a (super) phylum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 97:4438-4441.
  • Andersen, V., & Sardou J. (1994). PYROSOMA-ATLANTICUM (TUNICATA, THALIACEA) - DIEL MIGRATION AND VERTICAL-DISTRIBUTION AS A FUNCTION OF COLONY SIZE. JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH. 16, 337-349.
  • Averof, M. and M. Akam. 1995. Insect-crustacean relationships: Insights from comparative developmental and molecular studies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 347:293-303.
  • Averof, M. and M. Akam. 1995. Hox genes and the diversification of insect and crustacean body plans. Nature 376:420-423.
  • B. Baccetti, R. Dallai, and F. Rosati, “The spermatozoon of Arthropoda. IV. Corrodentia, Mallophaga and Thysanoptera”, Journal of Microscopy, vol. 8, pp. 249 - 260, 1969.
  • Ballard, J. W. O., O. Ballard, G. J. Olsen, D. P. Faith, W. A. Odgers, D. M. Rowell and P. Atkinson. 1992. Evidence from 12S ribosomal RNA sequences that onychophorans are modified arthropods. Science 258:1345-1348.
  • Bitsch, C. and J. Bitsch. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of basal hexapods among the mandibulate arthropods: a cladistics analysis based on comparative morphological characters. Zoologica Scripta 33(6):511-550.
  • Blaxter, M. 2001. Evolutionary biology - Sum of the arthropod parts. Nature 413(6852):121-122.
  • Boore, J.L., D. V. Lavrov, and W.M. Brown. 1998. Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans. Nature 392:667-668.
  • Boore, J.L., T.M. Collins, D. Stanton, L.L Daehler, and W.M. Brown. 1995. Deducing the pattern of arthropod phylogeny from mitochondrial DNA rearrangements. Nature 376:163-165.
  • Briggs, D.E.G., and R.A. Fortey. 1989. The early radiation and relationships of the major arthropod groups. Science 246:241-243.
  • Briggs. D. E. G., R. A. Fortey and M. A. Wills. 1993. How big was the Cambrian explosion? A taxonomic and morphologic comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods. Pages 33-44 in Evolutionary Patterns and Processes (D. R. Lees and D. Edwards, eds.) Linnean Society Symposium, Linnean Society of London.
  • Brusca, R.C. 2000. Unraveling the history of arthropod diversification. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87:13-25.
  • Brusca, Richard C., and Gary J. Brusca. 1990. Invertebrates. xiii + 992
  • Brusca, Richard C., and Gary J. Brusca. 2002. Invertebrates, Second Edition. xx + 936
  • Budd, G. E. 1996. Progress and problems in arthropod phylogeny. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:356-358.
  • Budd, G. E. 1996. The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stem-group. Lethaia 29:1-14.
  • Budd, G. E. 2002. A palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problem. Nature 417:271-275.
  • Butler AJ, Rees T, Beesley P, Bax NJ. 2010. Marine Biodiversity in the Australian Region. PLoS ONE 5(8): e11831. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011831
  • Cameron, S.L., K.B. Miller, C.A. D’Haese, M.F. Whiting, and S.C. Barker. 2004. Mitochondrial genome data alone are not enough to unambiguously resolve the relationships of Entognatha, Insecta and Crustacea sensu lato (Arthropoda). Cladistics 20:534–557.
  • Chen, J. C., L. Ramsköld, and G. Zhou. 1994. Evidence for monophyly and arthropod affinity of cambrian giant predators. Science 263:1304-1308.
  • Coll M, Piroddi C, Steenbeek J, Kaschner K, Ben Rais Lasram F, et al. 2010. The Biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea: Estimates, Patterns, and Threats. PLoS ONE 5(8): e11842. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011842
  • Cook, C. E., , Q. Yue, and M. Akam. 2005. Mitochondrial genomes suggest that hexapods and crustaceans are mutually paraphyletic. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 272(1569):1295-1304.
  • Cook, C. E., M. L. Smith, M. J. Telford, A. Bastianello, and M. Akam. 2001. Hox genes and the phylogeny of the arthropods. Current Biology 11:759-763.
  • Cowles, D., Dyer A., & McFadden M. (2002). Key to Invertebrates Found At or Near The Rosario Beach Marine Laboratory. 2011,
  • D. I. Blagoveshtchensky, “Materialy po faune naruznych parasitov (Arthropoda) zyvotnych kasalinskogo i nekotorych drugich rajonov juznogo Kasakstana. Materialy po vreditelam zyvotnovodstva i fauna preimuscestvenno juznogo Kasakstana, pod red”, Trudy Kasakst. Ak. Nauk, vol. 2, pp. 11 - 84, 1937.
  • Dohle, W. 1997. Are the insects more closely related to the crustaceans than to the myriapods? Entomologia Scandinavica Suppl. 51:7-16.
  • Dunlop, J. A. and C. P. Arango. 2005. Pycnogonid affinities: a review. Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research 43(1):8-21.
  • Edgecombe, G. D. 1998. Devonian terrestrial arthropods from Gondwana. Nature 394:172-175.
  • Edgecombe, G. D. (ed.) 1998. Arthropod fossils and phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Edgecombe, G. D. and L. Ramskold. 1999. Relationships of Cambrian Arachnata and the systematic position of Trilobita. Journal of Paleontology 73:263-287.
  • Edgecombe, G. D., G. D. F. Wilson, D. J. Colgan, M. R. Gray, and G. Cassis. 2000. Arthropod cladistics: Combined analysis of histone H3 and U2 snRNA sequences and morphology. Cladistics 16:155-203.
  • Edgecombe, G.D. and G. Giribet. 2002. Myriapod phylogeny and the relationships of Chilopoda. Pages 143-168 in: Biodiversidad, taxonomía y biogeografía de artrópodos de México: Hacia una síntesis de su conocimiento (J. Llorente Bousquets, J.J. Morrone & H. Ponce Ulloa, Eds.). Prensas de Ciencias, UNAM, Mexico.
  • F. Urbanski, “Arthropoda collected on small mammals in Wielkopolski. National Parc”, Prace. kom. Nauk roln. lesn., vol. 48, pp. 171 - 176, 1979.
  • Fortey, R. A. and R. H. Thomas (eds.) 1998. Arthropod Relationships. Systematics Association Special Volume Series 55. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Friedrich, M. and D. Tautz. 1995. Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 376:165-167.
  • Friedrich, M. and D. Tautz. 2001. Arthropod rDNA phylogeny revisited: a consistency analysis using Monte Carlo simulations. Pages 21-40 in Origin of the Hexapoda. T. Deuve, ed. Annales de la Société entomologique de France 37.
  • Fujikura K, Lindsay D, Kitazato H, Nishida S, Shirayama. 2010. Marine Biodiversity in Japanese Waters. PLoS ONE 5(8): e11836. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011836
  • Garcia-Machado, E., M. Pempera, N. Dennebouy, M. Oliva-Suarez, J. C. Mounolou, and M. Monnerot. 1999. Mitochondrial genes collectively suggest the paraphyly of crustacea with respect to insecta. Journal of Molecular Evolution 49:142-149.
  • Giribet G. and C. Ribera. 2000. A review of arthropod phylogeny: New data based on ribosomal DNA sequences and direct character optimization. Cladistics 16:204-231.
  • Giribet G., G. D. Edgecombe, and W. C. Wheeler. 2001. Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413:157-161.
  • Giribet, G. and C. Ribera. 1998. The position of arthropods in the animal kingdom: A search for a reliable outgroup for internal arthropod phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9:481-488.
  • Gordon DP, Beaumont J, MacDiarmid A, Robertson DA, Ahyong ST. 2010. Marine Biodiversity of Aotearoa New Zealand. PLoS ONE 5(8): e10905. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010905
  • Griffiths CL, Robinson TB, Lange L, Mead A, 2010. Marine Biodiversity in South Africa: An Evaluation of Current States of Knowledge. PLoS ONE 5(8): e12008. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012008
  • Griffiths HJ. 2010. Antarctic Marine Biodiversity ? What Do We Know About the Distribution of Life in the Southern Ocean?. PLoS ONE 5(8): e11683. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011683
  • H. Jakob Hansen, Studies on Arthropoda. III. On the comparative morphology of the appendages of the Arthropoda. B. Crustacea, Insecta, Myriopoda, and Arachnida. Copenhagen, Denmark: , 1930, p. 376.
  • Hassanin, A. 2006. Phylogeny of Arthropoda inferred from mitochondrial sequences: Strategies for limiting the misleading effects of multiple changes in pattern and rates of substitution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38(1):100-116.
  • Hwang, U. W., M. Friedrich, D. Tautz, C. J. Park, and W. Kim. 2001. Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates. Nature 413:154-157.
  • I. Pavlovic, Z. Kulišić, Ć. Milutinovi, and , “Significance of arthropoda in health problems of pheasants which are bred artificially”, Veterinarski Glasnik, vol. 49, pp. 745 - 749, 1995.
  • J. Złotorzycka, “Problemy wspolzaleznosci ewolucji Arthropoda i ich zywicieli”, Wiadomosci Parazytologiczne, vol. 18, no. 2-3, pp. 397 - 414, 1972.
  • J. Brown, The structure and function of the tundra ecosystem, U.S. Tundra Biome 1971 Progress Rept. 1 (1971).
  • J. L. Cloudsley-Thompson, “Adaptations of Arthropoda to arid environments”, Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 20, no. 192, pp. 261 - 283, 1975.
  • J. M. Doby et al., “Morphology and taxonomy of parasitic arthropoda”, in 4th International Congress of Parasitology, 1978, vol. Warsaw, Poland., pp. 169 - 172.
  • Janzen, J.-W. 2002. Arthropods in Baltic Amber. Ampyx-Verlag, Halle (Saale).
  • Kusche, K. and T. Burmester. 2001. Diplopod hemocyanin sequence and the phylogenetic position of the Myriapoda. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:1566-1573.
  • L. D. Harris and L. Paur, A quantitative food web analysis of a shortgrass community, Technical Report No. 154, Grassland Biome. U.S. International Biological Program (1972), from p. 17.
  • Lauterbach, K.E. 1988. The position of presumed Crustacea from the upper Cambrian in the phylogenetic system of the Mandibulata Arthropoda. Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Hamburg 30:409-468.
  • Lebrato, M., & Jones D. O. B. (2009). Mass deposition event of Pyrosoma atlanticum carcasses off Ivory Coast (West Africa). LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY. 54, 1197-1209.
  • MacNaughton, R. B, J. M. Cole, R. W. Dalrymple, S. J. Braddy, D. E. G. Briggs, and T. D. Lukie. 2002. First steps on land: Arthropod trackways in Cambrian-Ordovician eolian sandstone, southeastern Ontario, Canada. Geology 30:391-394.
  • Mallatt, J., J. R. Garey, and J. W. Shultz. 2004. Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (31)1:178-191.
  • Martinez ND (1991) Artifacts or attributes? Effects of resolution on the Little Rock Lake food web. Ecol Monogr 61:367–392
  • Metaxas A, Kelly NE, 2010. Do Larval Supply and Recruitment Vary among Chemosynthetic Environments of the Deep Sea?. PLoS ONE 5(7): e11646. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011646
  • Myers, P., R. Espinosa, C. S. Parr, T. Jones, G. S. Hammond, and T. A. Dewey. 2006. The Animal Diversity Web (online). Accessed February 16, 2011 at http://animaldiversity.org. http://www.animaldiversity.org
  • Müller, K. J. and D. Walossek. 1985. A remarkable arthropod fauna from the Upper Cambrian "Orsten" of Sweden. Transactions Royal Society Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 76:161-172.
  • N. J. H. Campbell and S. C. Barker, “An unprecedented major rearrangement in an arthropod mitochondrial genome”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1786 - 1787, 1998.
  • Negrisolo, E., A. Minelli, and G. Valle. 2004. The mitochondrial genome of the house centipede Scutigera and the monophyly versus paraphyly of myriapods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21:770-780.
  • Osorio, D., M. Averof, and J. P. Bacon. 1995. Arthropod evolution: great brains, beautiful bodies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:449-454.
  • Panganiban, G. A. Sebring, L. Nagy, and S. Carroll. 1995. The development of crustacean limbs and the evolution of arthropods. Science 270:1363-1366.
  • Paulus, H. F. 2000. Phylogeny of the Myriapoda-Crustacea-Insecta: a new attempt using photoreceptor structure. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 38:189-208.
  • Peel, A. D., A. D. Chipman, and M. Akam. 2005. Arthropod segmentation: Beyond the Drosophila paradigm. Nature Reviews Genetics 6(12):905-916.
  • Pisani, D., L.L. Polig, M. Lyons-Weiler, and S. B. Hedges. 2004. The colonization of land animals: molecular phylogeny and divergence times among arthropods. BMC Biol. 2(1).
  • Polis GA (1991) Complex desert food webs: an empirical critique of food web theory. Am Nat 138:123–155
  • R. A. Ringuelet, “Aceros e insectos parásitos, nuevos para la fauna argentina”, Arthropoda, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 116, 1947.
  • R. G. Beutel and S. N. Gorb, “Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny”, Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, vol. 39, pp. 177 - 207, 2001.
  • R. H. Green and B. L. Munday, “Parasites of Tasmanian native and feral fauna. Part 1. Arthropoda”, Records of the Queen Victoria Museum, vol. 41, pp. 1 - 16, 1971.
  • R. L. Palma, P. M. Lovis, and C. Tither, “An annotated list of primary types of the phyla Arthropoda (except Crustacea) and Tardigrada held in the National Museum of New Zealand”, National Museum of New Zealand Miscellaneous Series, vol. 20, pp. 1 - 49, 1989.
  • Regier, J. C. and J. W. Shultz. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of the major arthropod groups indicates polyphyly of crustaceans and a new hypothesis for the origin of hexapods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14:902-913.
  • Regier, J. C. and J. W. Shultz. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of arthropods and the significance of the Cambrian "explosion" for molecular systematics. American Zoologist 38:918-928.
  • Regier, J. C. and J. W. Shultz. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of Myriapoda (Arthropoda) using two nuclear protein-encoding genes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 132:469-486.
  • Regier, J. C. and J. W. Shultz. 2001. Elongation factor-2: A useful gene for arthropod phylogenetics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20:136-148.
  • Regier, J. C., H. M. Wilson, and J. W. Shultz. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of Myriapoda using three nuclear protein-coding genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 34(1):147-158.
  • Regier, J. C., J. W. Shultz, A. Zwick, A. Hussey, B. Ball, R. Wetzer, J. W. Martin, and C. W. Cunningham. 2010. Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08742
  • Regier, J. C., J. W. Shultz, and R. E. Kambic. 2005. Pancrustacean phylogeny: hexapods are terrestrial crustaceans and maxillopods are not monophyletic. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 272(1561):395-401.
  • Richter, S. 2002. The Tetraconata concept: hexapod-crustacean relationships and the phylogeny of Crustacea. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 2:217-237.
  • Rota-Stabellia, O. and M. J. Telford. 2008. A multi criterion approach for the selection of optimal outgroups in phylogeny: Recovering some support for Mandibulata over Myriochelata using mitogenomics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48(1):103-111.
  • Scholtz, G. 2001. Evolution of developmental patterns in arthropods - the analysis of gene expression and its bearing on morphology and phylogenetics. Zoology 103:99-111.
  • Schram, F. R. and R. A. Jenner. 2001. The origin of Hexapoda: a crustacean perspective. Pages 243-264 in Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Origin of the Hexapoda. T. Deuve, ed. Annales de la Société entomologique de France 37.
  • Shear, W. A. and J. Kukalová-Peck. 1990. The ecology of paleozoic terrestrial arthropods: the fossil evidence. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68:1807–1834.
  • Shultz, J. W. and J. C. Regier. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of arthropods using two nuclear protein-coding genes supports a crustacean , hexapod clade. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 267:1011-1019.
  • Steven Vogel. 2003. Comparative Biomechanics: Life's Physical World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 580 p.
  • Strausfeld N. J. 1998. Crusteacean-insect relationships: The use of brain characters to derive phylogeny amongst segmented invertebrates. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 52:186-206.
  • Stys, P., and J. Zrzavy. 1994. Phylogeny and classification of extant Arthropoda: Review of hypotheses and nomenclature. European Journal of Entomology 91:257-275.
  • Telford, M. J. and R. H. Thomas. 1995. Demise of the Atelocerata? Nature 376:123-124.
  • Telford, M. J., Bourlat S. J., Economou A., Papillon D., & Rota-Stabelli O. (2008). The evolution of the Ecdysozoa. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 363(1496), 1529 - 1537.
  • Timmermans, M. J. T. N., D. Roelofs, J. Marien, and N. M. van Straalen. 2008. Revealing pancrustacean relationships: Phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal protein genes places Collembola (springtails) in a monophyletic Hexapoda and reinforces the discrepancy between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2008, 8:83. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-83
  • V. Olmos and G. Muñoz, “Current state of knowledge of eumetazoan parasites of chilean freshwater ecosystems”, Gayana, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 122 - 139, 2006.
  • W. Eichler, “Arthropoda. Insecta. Phthiraptera I. Mallophaga.”, in Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. III. Insecta. 7b Phthiraptera, vol. 5, H. G. Bronns Leipzig: Verlagegesellschaft Geost & Portig K.G., 1963, p. 291.
  • Waggoner, B. M. 1996. Phylogenetic Hypotheses of the Relationships of Arthropods to Precambrian and Cambrian Problematic Fossil Taxa. Systematic Biology 45:190-222.
  • Waloszek, D. and J. A. Dunlop. 2002. A larval sea spider (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) from the Upper Cambrian 'Orsten' of Sweden, and the phylogenetic position of pycnogonids. Palaeontology 45:421-446.
  • Waloszek, D. and K. J. Müller. 1990. Upper Cambrian stem-lineage crustaceans and their bearing upon the monophyletic origin of Crustacea and the position of Agnostus. Lethaia 23:409-427.
  • Weygoldt, P. 1998. Evolution and systematics of the Chelicerata. Experimental and Applied Acarology 22:63-79.
  • Wheeler, W.C. and C.Y. Hayashi. 1998. The phylogeny of the extant chelicerate orders. Cladistics 14:173-192.
  • Wheeler, W.C., P. Cartwright, and C.Y. Hayashi. 1993. Arthropod phylogeny: A combined approach. Cladistics 9:1-39.
  • WoRMS (2014). Arthropoda. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1065
  • Zrzavy, J. and P. Stys. 1997. The basic body plan of arthropods: Insights from evolutionary morphology and developmental biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 10:353-367.

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!