Articles on this page are available in 3 other languages: Chinese (Simplified) (5), Spanish (30), Dutch (1) (learn more)
Overview
Brief Summary
Trusted
Description
Adaptation: Imagine the structural and functional changes involved in transforming the right forelimb of a general mammalian type, such this Hedgehog, Erinaceus europaeus, into that of a cetaceans flipper, such as we find in the Bottle-nosed dolphin, Tursiops truncatus.
Links:
Mammal Species of the World
- Original description: Montagu 1821. Memoirs of the Wernerian Natural History Society, 3:75, pl. 3.
Trusted
Biology
Trusted
Description
Trusted
Comprehensive Description
Description
Trusted
Distribution
-
Müller, Y. (2004). Faune et flore du littoral du Nord, du Pas-de-Calais et de la Belgique: inventaire. [Coastal fauna and flora of the Nord, Pas-de-Calais and Belgium: inventory]. Commission Régionale de Biologie Région Nord Pas-de-Calais: France. 307 pp.
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=9269
-
North-West Atlantic Ocean species (NWARMS)
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=2901
-
Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen: Beheerseenheid Mathematisch Model Noordzee en Schelde-estuarium: Oostende
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=1122
-
Camphuysen, Kees
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=1119
-
Jefferson, T.A., S. Leatherwood and M.A. Webber. 1993. Marine mammals of the world. FAO Species Identification Guide. Rome. 312 p.
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=2986
-
Keller, R.W., S. Leatherwood & S.J. Holt (1982). Indian Ocean Cetacean Survey, Seychelle Islands, April to June 1980. Rep. Int. Whal. Commn 32, 503-513.
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=6208
-
Jan Haelters
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=141792
-
Gordon, D. (Ed.) (2009). New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity. Volume One: Kingdom Animalia. 584 pp
http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=sourcedetails&id=145244
-
Felder, D.L. and D.K. Camp (eds.), Gulf of Mexico–Origins, Waters, and Biota. Biodiversity. Texas A&M Press, College Station, Texas.
http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=sourcedetails&id=145245
-
van der Land, J. (2001). Tetrapoda, in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels, 50: pp. 375-376
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=1406
-
Slijper, E.J. (1938). Die Sammlung rezenter Cetacea des Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique [The collection of recent Cetacea of the Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique]. Bull. Mus. royal d'Hist. Nat. Belg./Med. Kon. Natuurhist. Mus. Belg. 14(10): 1-33
http://www.marinespecies.org/cetacea/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=1619
-
MEDIN (2011). UK checklist of marine species derived from the applications Marine Recorder and UNICORN, version 1.0.
http://www.marinespecies.org/asteroidea/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=149081
-
Guiry, M.D. & Guiry, G.M. (2011). Species.ie version 1.0 World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway (version of 15 March 2010).
http://www.marinespecies.org/ascidiacea/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=149068
-
Borges, P.A.V., Costa, A., Cunha, R., Gabriel, R., Gonçalves, V., Martins, A.F., Melo, I., Parente, M., Raposeiro, P., Rodrigues, P., Santos, R.S., Silva, L., Vieira, P. & Vieira, V. (Eds.) (2010). A list of the terrestrial and marine biota from the Azores. Princípia, Oeiras, 432 pp.
http://www.marinespecies.org/ascidiacea/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=149079
-
Ramos, M. (ed.). 2010. IBERFAUNA. The Iberian Fauna Databank
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=149024
-
Koukouras, Athanasios. (2010). Check-list of marine species from Greece. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Assembled in the framework of the EU FP7 PESI project.
http://www.marinespecies.org/asteroidea/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=142068
-
Gannier, A. (2000). Distribution of cetaceans off Society Islands (French Polynesia) as obtained from dedicated survey Aquat. Mamm. 26(2): 111-126.
http://www.marinespecies.org/cetacea/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=163031
-
Bearzi, G.; Politi, E.; Agazzi, S.; Bruno, S.; Costa, M.; Bonizzoni, S. (2005). Occurrence and present status of coastal dolphins (Delphinus delphis and Tursiops truncatus) in the eastern Ionian Sea Aquat. Conserv. 15(3): 243–257.
http://www.marinespecies.org/cetacea/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=163029
-
Genov, T. et al. (2008). Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Slovenian and adjacent waters (northern Adriatic Sea) Ann., Ser. Hist. Nat. 18(2): 227-244.
http://www.marinespecies.org/cetacea/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=163030
-
Government of Kenya. 2009. State of the Coast Report. Towards Integrated Management of Coastal and Marine Resources in Kenya. National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), Nairobi. 88 pp.
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=164096
Trusted
Range Description
The Fiordland Bottlenose Dolphins comprise a regional subpopulation inhabiting the coastal fiords and bays of Fiordland, a mountainous, rainforest-covered World Heritage Area in the southwest of New Zealand’s South Island. The subpopulation is located at the southern limit of the species’ worldwide range and is genetically and geographically isolated from other coastal New Zealand subpopulations (Tezanos-Pinto et al. 2008). The nearest subpopulation seen regularly in coastal waters is located more than 500 km north in the Marlborough Sounds. Sightings of Tursiops in other South Island areas are uncommon and sporadic.
The subpopulation is subdivided into three discrete local units: one local unit ranges among the smaller fiords and bays of the northern Fiordland coast while two local units reside within the complexes formed by Doubtful and Thompson Sounds, and Dusky and Breaksea Sounds (Williams et al. 1993, Bräger and Schneider 1998, Lusseau and Slooten 2002, Currey et al. 2007, Currey et al. 2008a). These local units are largely isolated from each other, but there have been records of exchange between units (Lusseau et al. 2006), suggesting the units require management as a collective subpopulation.
The Doubtful-Thompson Sound local unit has exhibited a consistent, high degree of site fidelity since 1990 (Currey et al. 2007, Currey et al. 2008b). The Dusky-Breaksea Sound local unit has also shown a high degree of site fidelity in the three years of study to date (Currey et al. 2008a). Members of the Northern Fiordland local unit have a larger distribution, having been photo-identified in Milford Sound, Sutherland Sound, Bligh Sound, George Sound, Caswell Sound, Charles Sound and Lake McKerrow, which connects to the sea (Bräger and Schneider 1998, Lusseau and Slooten 2002, Lusseau 2003b, Boisseau 2004, Currey 2006, Currey 2009).
The minimum extent of occurrence (EOO) of the subpopulation is approximately 450 km², representing the sum of the established home ranges of the local units. A reasonable upper estimate of EOO for the subpopulation is approximately 2,400 km², encompassing the inshore waters of Fiordland and a coastal range that extends 325 km from Puysegur Point, just south of Dusky Sound to Jackson Bay, north of Lake McKerrow and offshore for 5 km.
Trusted
Range Description
Trusted
Geographic Range
Tursiops truncatus typically occupies waters with surface temperatures between 50 and 90 degrees Fahrenheit. Although some bottlenosed dolphins migrate seasonally (for example, populations along the Atlantic coast), they are typically found in tropical, subtropical, and warm temperate waters.
Biogeographic Regions: indian ocean (Native ); atlantic ocean (Native ); pacific ocean (Native ); mediterranean sea (Native )
Other Geographic Terms: cosmopolitan
- Klinowska, M. 1991. Dolphins, Porpoises and Whales of the World. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
- Reynolds, III, J., R. Wells, S. Eide. 2000. The Bottlenosed Dolphin. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
- Reynolds, III, J., R. Wells. 2003. Dolphins, Whales, and Manatees. Gainesville, Florida: University Press of Florida.
- Jefferson, T., M. Webber, R. Pitman. 2008. Marine Mammals of the World. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
Trusted
-
UNESCO-IOC Register of Marine Organisms
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=1318
Trusted
-
North-West Atlantic Ocean species (NWARMS)
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=2901
Trusted
National Distribution
United States
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
Trusted
Global Range: (>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)) Worldwide distribution primarily in coastal and inshore areas of tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions; most common near shore, but occurs also pelagically in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean and some other areas; generally not poleward of 45 degrees latitude except off northwestern Europe (Jefferson et al. 1993).
Trusted
Range
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Physical Description
Bottlenosed dolphins have a fusiform body that lacks many external characteristics of terrestrial mammals, including hair, external ears and hind limbs. A fusiform body reduces turbulence and allows bottlenosed dolphins to cruise underwater at high speeds. Dolphins have front flippers, a dorsal fin and flukes, which are used in swimming. The dorsal fin is tall, curved and set near the middle of the back. These dolphins are typically black to a light gray on their sides, and their bellies are white, sometimes with a slight pink hue. Bottlenosed dolphins are typically 84 to 140 cm at birth, and typically weigh between 14 and 20 kg. Adult males are usually between 244 and 381 cm long, and weigh about 500 kg. Adult females are typically between 228 and 366 cm, and weigh about 250 kg. This sexual dimorphism may be a result of females using energy to achieve sexual maturity at a earlier age than males, while males continue to grow.
As is true of all modern cetaceans, the skulls of bottlenosed dolphins are telescoped; that is, the rostra are elongated and tapered anteriorly and the nostrils are moved dorsally. This allows dolphins to breathe more easily during swimming. Bottlenosed dolphins are homeotherms and endotherms. They use insulation, in the form of blubber, a relatively small surface area due to their large body sizes, and vascular shunts that allow selective cooling of certain organs and tissues to help thermoregulate. Bottlenosed dolphins have a thermoneutral zone of 13 to 28 degrees Celsius. If the temperature of their environment drops below 13 degrees Celsius or rises above 28 degrees Celsius, their metabolic rate increases.
Range mass: 260 to 500 kg.
Average mass: 400 kg.
Range length: 228 to 381 cm.
Other Physical Features: endothermic ; homoiothermic; bilateral symmetry
Sexual Dimorphism: male larger
- Reeves, R., B. Stewart, P. Clapham, J. Powell. 2002. Sea Animals of the World. New York: A & C Black Publishers.
Trusted
Size
Size in North America
Range: 2.6-3.4 m
Weight:
Range: 200 kg
Trusted
Type Information
Catalog Number: USNM A16504
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Mammals
Sex/Stage: Male;
Preparation: Skull; Skeleton
Collector(s): U.S.F.C "Fish Hawk"
Year Collected: 1881
Locality: Cherrystone Point, Northampton, Virginia, United States, Chesapeake Bay, North America, North Atlantic Ocean
- Syntype: True, F. W. 1884. Great International Fisheries Exhibition, London, 1883. Catalogue Of The Aquatic Animals Exhibited By The United States National Museum. 16.
Trusted
Catalog Number: USNM A16505
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Mammals
Sex/Stage: Female;
Preparation: Skull; Skeleton; Cast
Collector(s): U.S.F.C. "Fish Hawk"
Year Collected: 1881
Locality: Cherrystone Point, Northampton, Virginia, United States, Chesapeake Bay, North America, North Atlantic Ocean
- Syntype: True, F. W. 1884. Great International Fisheries Exhibition, London, 1883. Catalogue Of The Aquatic Animals Exhibited By The United States National Museum. 16.
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Habitat and Ecology
The Fiordland bottlenose dolphins exhibit many characteristics that appear to reflect constraints imposed by their cold-water habitat. They are physically larger than coastal conspecifics found in warmer waters, with rotund bodies and comparatively shorter flukes, fins and rostrum (Schneider 1999). The dolphins are found in large groups, sometimes comprising an entire local unit, and show strong, long-lasting associations within and between sexes (Lusseau et al. 2003), unlike the fission-fusion societies typical of many other bottlenose dolphin subpopulations (Connor et al. 2000).
The Doubtful-Thompson Sound local unit’s habitat use changes seasonally in apparent response to water temperature (Schneider 1999). Water temperatures in the inner parts of the fiords are cooler than open coast in winter and warmer in summer. In winter, the dolphins avoid the inner regions of the fiord, remaining closer to the open ocean, while in summer the dolphins are found in the inner sections of the fiord where they calve in the warmer waters (Schneider 1999, Haase and Schneider 2001). Seasonal patterns in bottlenose dolphin distribution relating to water temperature are unusual and are typically only observed in subpopulations in cool-temperate latitudes (e.g. Wilson et al. 1997, Ingram and Rogan 2002).
Stable isotope studies of exfoliated skin show that the dolphins are reliant on local productivity, feeding primarily on sub-tidal reef fish (Lusseau and Wing 2006). The dolphins have been shown to dive beyond 200m in the deep waters (max depth 434m) of Doubtful Sound (Schneider 1999).
Systems
- Marine
Trusted
Habitat and Ecology
Bottlenose dolphins are commonly associated with many other cetaceans, including both large whales and other dolphin species (Wells and Scott 1999). Mixed schools with Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins have been found, for instance off China and Taiwan (J. Wang pers. comm.).
Bottlenose dolphins consume a wide variety of prey species, mostly fish and squid (Barros and Odell 1990; Barros and Wells 1998; Blanco et al. 2001; Santos et al. 2001). They sometimes eat shrimps and other crustaceans.
Systems
- Marine
Trusted
Bottlenosed dolphins are found everywhere except polar waters. Deep water bottlenosed dolphins come up to take breaths every 1 to 2 minutes, whereas inshore bottlenosed dolphins take breaths two times per minute. Bottlenosed dolphins have been known, however, to dive deep enough to go 4.5 minutes without taking a breath. Bottlenosed dolphins are found in bays, estuaries, sounds, open shorelines and large, estuarine rivers.
Average depth: 1 m.
Habitat Regions: temperate ; tropical ; saltwater or marine
Aquatic Biomes: pelagic ; coastal ; brackish water
Other Habitat Features: estuarine
- Ridgway, S., S. Harrison. 1999. Handbook of Marine Mammals. London: Academic Press.
Trusted
-
North-West Atlantic Ocean species (NWARMS)
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=2901
Trusted
-
UNESCO-IOC Register of Marine Organisms
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=1318
Trusted
Water temperature and chemistry ranges based on 7761 samples.
Environmental ranges
Depth range (m): 0 - 0
Temperature range (°C): 1.736 - 29.485
Nitrate (umol/L): 0.000 - 23.025
Salinity (PPS): 30.701 - 40.333
Oxygen (ml/l): 4.253 - 7.718
Phosphate (umol/l): 0.048 - 1.582
Silicate (umol/l): 0.399 - 14.997
Graphical representation
Temperature range (°C): 1.736 - 29.485
Nitrate (umol/L): 0.000 - 23.025
Salinity (PPS): 30.701 - 40.333
Oxygen (ml/l): 4.253 - 7.718
Phosphate (umol/l): 0.048 - 1.582
Silicate (umol/l): 0.399 - 14.997
Note: this information has not been validated. Check this *note*. Your feedback is most welcome.
Trusted
Habitat Type: Marine
Comments: Offshore form frequents pelagic waters, especially in tropics. Coastal form usually shoreward of 20 m contour, often in lagoons, bays, river mouths; ascends river in some areas; common near passes connecting large bays with ocean. Young are born in the water.
Trusted
Trusted
Trusted
Migration
Non-Migrant: No. All populations of this species make significant seasonal migrations.
Locally Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).
Locally Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.
Makes regular movements between inshore and offshore areas, and for distances up to 100 km linearly along coast. Much larger movements may occur (Wells et al. 1999), but whether these constitute migrations is uncertain.
Trusted
Trophic Strategy
Food Habits
The diet of bottlenosed dolphins is broad and varies from one place to another. Inshore bottlenosed dolphins typically feed on fish and invertebrates found near the shoreline, while deep water bottlenosed dolphins typically feed on squid and pelagic fish. Bottlenosed dolphins found along the U.S. Atlantic coast typically feed on Atlantic croakers (Micropogonias undulatus), ‘spot’ fish (Leistomomus xanthurus), and silver perch (Bairdiella chrysoura), while dolphins in South Africa typically feed on African massbankers (Trachurus delagoae), olive grunters (Pomadasys olivaceus), and pandora (Pagellus bellotti). Bottlenosed dolphins typically choose prey between 5 and 30 cm in length. They eat between 4.5 and 16 kg per day, depending on the size of the individual and if it is lactating. Most of the time, bottlenosed dolphins feed individually. At times, however, dolphins participate in cooperative feeding with other dolphins, especially when feeding on a school of prey. They have also been known to trap their prey on the shore, stranding themselves in order to feed on stranded prey ("strand feeding"). And in some cases dolphins use echolocation calls to stun their prey. Some bottlenosed dolphins use passive listening rather than echolocation to locate prey. When prey is detected, these dolphins either rush in or alert others of the prey’s presence.
The sharp teeth of these dolphins allow them to grasp prey while the tongue maneuvers prey down the throat. Dolphins teeth are not used to chew and prey is typically swallowed whole. They may break up their prey by shaking it in the air and striking it with their tails, called fish-whacking. Bottlenosed dolphins in Australia may mount a sponge on their rostrum to protect their snouts as they forage on the bottom. They have also been known to follow the boats of fisherman and catch discarded prey or bait.
Animal Foods: fish; mollusks; aquatic crustaceans
Primary Diet: carnivore (Piscivore , Eats non-insect arthropods, Molluscivore )
Trusted
Comments: Very opportunistic feeder; prefers fishes (e.g., mullet), squid, crustaceans, and cephalopods. Sometimes drives fish ashore and comes out of the water in pursuit. Foraging by plunging the head into sandy bottoms has been observed in the Bahamas (Rossbach and Herzing 1997).
Trusted
Associations
Ecosystem Roles
Bottlenosed dolphins feed on small fish and squid. They are hosts for a few species of parasites including the fluke Braunina cordiformis, tapeworms such as Monorygma delphini, roundworms (Anisakis marina), and thorny-headed worms (Corynosoma cetaceum). It has been said that healthy bottlenosed dolphin populations indicate a healthy marine ecosystem.
Ecosystem Impact: keystone species
Commensal/Parasitic Species:
- flukes (Braunina cordiformis)
- tapeworms (Monorygma delphini)
- roundworms (Anisakis marina)
- thorny-headed worms (Corynosoma cetaceum)
Trusted
Predation
The most common predators of bottlenosed dolphins are larger sharks, such as bull (Carcharhinus leucas), tiger (Galeocerdo cuvier), and dusky sharks (Carcharhinus altimus). These sharks prey on smaller dolphins, calves and female dolphins more than larger dolphins. It is not uncommon to observe dolphins with shark bites, demonstrating their survival of an attack. Blubber may provide some protection against predators. Many shark populations have decreased up to 80 percent since 1970, so some populations of dolphins may be experiencing lower predation by sharks. More recently, stingrays have been recognized as causing deaths in bottlenosed dolphin populations.
Known Predators:
- bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas)
- tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier)
- dusky sharks (Carcharhinus altimus)
Trusted
Known prey organisms
Penaeidae
Mugilidae
Actinopterygii
Rajiformes
Archosargus probatocephalus
Based on studies in:
USA: Florida (Estuarine)
This list may not be complete but is based on published studies.
- W. M. Kemp, W. H. B. Smith, H. N. McKellar, M. E. Lehman, M. Homer, D. L. Young and H. T. Odum, Energy cost-benefit analysis applied to power plants near Crystal River, Florida. In: Ecosystem Modeling in Theory and Practice: An Introduction with Case His
Trusted
Population Biology
Global Abundance
10,000 to >1,000,000 individuals
Comments: Population in the southeastern Pacific Ocean was estimated to be 588,000 in 1978. NMFS estimated in 1989 that the population off the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the U.S. was 14,000-23,000 (see Nowak 1991).
Trusted
General Ecology
Group size usually less than 10 (coastal form) or 25 (offshore form), though herds of several hundred sometimes are reported offshore. Individuals may segregate by age and sex.
Coastal form apparently has limited home range along segment of coast; for example, resident dolphins in a South Carolina estuary had home ranges over four years that averaged 51.3 square kilometers (95% adaptive kernel method; Gubbins 2002). However, in the Southern California Bight, dolphins are highly mobile within a relatively narrow coastal zone, extending from at least Santa Barbara to Ensenada, Mexico (Defran et al. 1999). Offshore form apparently is less restricted in movements and may move long distances over deep water (e.g., see Wells et al. 1999).
In Florida, mean mortality rate was 19% in first year, up to 3.8% annually thereafter (see IUCN 1991).
Trusted
Life History and Behavior
Behavior
Communication and Perception
Bottlenosed dolphins use sound to communicate with other members of their groups. They use both audible sounds and high frequency echolocation. Each dolphin is believed to possess its own signature whistle and, once it is developed, it is retained for the duration of the dolphin’s life. Kin recognize one another by their whistles and these sounds help maintain group cohesion. Signature whistles develop in calves as young as one month, allowing them to maintain contact with their mother. Surprisingly, the signature whistle of a male calf tends to resemble its mother's more than that of a female calf. The signature whistle also gives the location and emotional state of each dolphin. Bottlenosed dolphins also navigate with echolocation, used to detect bottom topography, prey, and the presence of predators. It is even sometimes used to stun prey. Echolocation calls pass through the melon and intramandibular fat body, which contain acoustic lipids; these structures serve as acoustic lenses to focus sound. The intramandibular fat bodies focus sound to each ear, while the melon is used as a lens to focus outgoing sound.
Bottlenosed dolphins also use vision to perceive their surroundings. Like those of humans, their eyes contain rods and cones, but they are not used in the same way as humans. Cones, for example, are used to provide good acuity when light levels are high. These and other adaptations allow dolphins to use their vision at different times of the day and at different depths.
Communication Channels: visual ; tactile ; acoustic
Other Communication Modes: vibrations
Perception Channels: visual ; acoustic ; echolocation ; vibrations
Trusted
Cyclicity
Life Expectancy
Lifespan/Longevity
Bottlenosed dolphins are threatened by a variety of factors, both natural and of human origin. Natural mortality is due to injury, disease, and predation. Male bottlenosed dolphins typically live about 40 to 45 years and female dolphins can live over 50 years (the oldest female documented lived to be 53 years old). Because in many cases dolphins are found in shallow waters, they encounter many humans and human activities. Recreational fishing gear causes many deaths when dolphins become entangled in nets or swallow fishing hooks. Dolphins are sometimes preyed upon by sharks, although this is may be less of a problem now than in the past due to declining shark populations. One of the largest and most serious threats to bottlenosed dolphins is environmental contamination, caused mainly by the increase of human development along shorelines. Chemicals of human origin find their way into coastal ecosystems through runoff from agriculture, residential, and industrial sources.
Range lifespan
Status: captivity: 53 (high) years.
Average lifespan
Status: captivity: 45 years.
Average lifespan
Status: wild: 25.0 years.
Average lifespan
Status: captivity: 30.0 years.
Average lifespan
Status: wild: 25.0 years.
Average lifespan
Status: wild: 35.0 years.
Average lifespan
Status: wild: 25.0 years.
Trusted
Lifespan, longevity, and ageing
Trusted
Reproduction
Bottlenosed dolphins are polygamous. They engage in mating behavior in either of two ways, in alliances or individually. Males that form alliances look for females that are in estrous. When males find a female in estrous they separate her from her home range for a chance to mate with her. Sometimes they flank the female to prevent access by other males to insure that only they have the opportunity to mate with her. Waiting for a female to become receptive can take several weeks. Some males do not engage in alliances, instead remaining in their home ranges. When an estrous female enters the home range of such a male, he attempts to attract her to mate. During courtship, a male postures by arching his back. He strokes and nuzzles the female, and he may clap his jaws or yelp. Bottlenosed dolphin copulation typically occurs belly-to-belly with both animals facing the same direction, although an animal facing the opposite direction is not uncommon. Intromission lasts only around 10 seconds and involves vigorous pelvis thrusts.
Mating System: polygynandrous (promiscuous) ; cooperative breeder
Female dolphins typically reach sexual maturity between 5 and 10 years of age, while males reach sexual maturity between 8 and 13 years old. Sexual maturity is usually achieved years before reproduction; males that reach sexual maturity at age 10 don’t typically breed until they are at approximately 20 years old. Reproductive seasons vary from region to region. Typically, females ovulate at a particular time of year while males are active throughout the year (but with a peak of testosterone production when females ovulate). Gestation lasts about 12 months and each pregnancy produces one calf. Females nurse their young from nipples on each side of their genital slit until the calf is between 18 and 20 months. Bottlenosed dolphins reproduce every 3 to 6 years, with females usually becoming pregnant soon after their calf is weaned. Calves can be born at any time of the year but with a peak in birthing during warmer months. Females can reproduce well into their late forties.
Breeding interval: Female bottlenosed dolphins breed once every 3 to 6 years.
Breeding season: Breeding may occur throughout the year but is often concentrated in the warmer months.
Average number of offspring: 1.
Average gestation period: 12 months.
Range birth mass: 14 to 20 kg.
Range weaning age: 18 to 20 months.
Average time to independence: 5 years.
Range age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female): 5 to 10 years.
Range age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male): 8 to 13 years.
Key Reproductive Features: iteroparous ; year-round breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); viviparous
Average gestation period: 365 days.
Average number of offspring: 1.
Females provide the bulk of parental investment, investing especially heavily during lactation. Lactation in bottlenosed dolphins typically lasts 18 to 20 months. Lactating females require 88 to 153 cal/kg as opposed to non-lactating females that typically require 34 to 67 cal/kg. Bottlenosed dolphins participate in allomaternal care, that is, all of the females within a group help care for each others' offspring. When a bottlenosed dolphin calf is born, it learns to ride the pressure waves alongside its mother during its first few days. The mother assists the calf to keep it alongside her body. Females also protect calves from predators.
Parental Investment: precocial ; pre-fertilization (Provisioning, Protecting: Female); pre-hatching/birth (Provisioning: Female, Protecting: Female); pre-weaning/fledging (Provisioning: Female, Protecting: Female); pre-independence (Provisioning: Female, Protecting: Female); post-independence association with parents
- Reynolds, III, J., R. Wells, S. Eide. 2000. The Bottlenosed Dolphin. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
- Reynolds, III, J., R. Wells. 2003. Dolphins, Whales, and Manatees. Gainesville, Florida: University Press of Florida.
- Jefferson, T., M. Webber, R. Pitman. 2008. Marine Mammals of the World. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
Trusted
Gestation lasts about 12 months. Produces one young every 2-6 years. Young are closely tended by adults for 1st several months, weaned in 12-18 months or more. Males are sexually mature in 8-12 years, females in 5-12 years; average age of sexual maturity is around 11-12 years; a few live up to at least 40 (males) to 50 (females) years (Leatherwood and Reeves 1983, IUCN 1991).
Trusted
Evolution and Systematics
Functional Adaptations
Functional adaptation
The body of the dolphin has low friction in water by having an optimal length to diameter ratio.
"The streamlined body of optimal shape has a length of 4.5 times its diameter. In this case the surface is smallest relative to the volume. This optimal numerical proportion has not remained a secret from nature: for dolphins (Tursiops gilli) the ratio is close to 5." The author goes on to talk about the Reynolds number and how the shape of the dolphin shows high efficiency: "As a matter of fact, the maximal diameter of the dolphin is slightly back of center. Obviously, the above-mentioned effect was taken into consideration. Experiments have confirmed that this particular shape lowers friction drag in turbulent boundary layers to 65%." (Tributsch 1984: 48)
Learn more about this functional adaptation.
- Tributsch, H. 1984. How life learned to live. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 218 p.
Trusted
Functional adaptation
The blubber of the bottlenose dolphin absorbs heat by acting as a phase change material
"There is substantial evidence to support the classification of the integument, and specifically the blubber layer [of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin], as a phase change material. First, many of the fatty acids found in blubber are classified as phase change materials and have melting points in the range of mammalian body temperatures (Sari, 2003; Sari and Kaygusuz, 2001; Sari et al., 2003; Suppes et al., 2003). Suppes et al. (2003) classified palmitic (C16:0), steric (18:0), oleic (C18:1), linoleic (C18:2), linolenic (C18:3) and arachidic (C20:0) fatty acids as excellent phase change materials. All of these fatty acids have been identified in cetacean blubber (Koopman et al., 1996). Mixtures of these fatty acids yield phase change materials with melting points between 29° and 38°C (Suppes et al., 2003), which include the range of mammalian body temperatures. Second, these fatty acids also satisfy the requirement that the material has a relatively large latent heat plateau, with latent heat values generally greater than 180·J·g–1 (Suppes et al., 2003). Third, their stratification in blubber may be prevented by their containment in adipocytes as well as the highly structured nature of adipocytes in the blubber tissue. Finally, cetaceans are known to have fine vascular control to their appendages and to the periphery of their body (Elsner et al., 1974; Kvadsheim and Folkow, 1997; Ling, 1974; Meagher et al., 2002; Pabst et al., 1999b; Scholander and Schevill, 1955). Intermittent heat loads could be applied to the blubber through shunting of warm blood to the blubber layer, followed by periods of vasoconstriction. Future studies are needed to fully characterize blubber’s potential phase change properties as well as investigate the possible functions that may be associated with such a property." (Dunkin et al., 2005: 1479)
Learn more about this functional adaptation.
- Dunkin RC; McLellan WA; Blum JE; Pabst DA. 2005. The ontogenetic changes in the thermal properties of blubber from Atlantic bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncates. Journal of Experimental Biology. 208(8): 1469-1480.
- Nikoli R; Marinovic-Cincovic M; Gadzuric S; Zsigrai IJ. 2003. New materials for solar thermal storage—solid/ liquid transitions in fatty acid esters. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells. 79: 285-292.
Trusted
Functional adaptation
The members of bottlenose dolphin pods stun prey by emitting low-frequency sound waves.
"More recent, but equally intriguing, is the discovery that dolphins may use not only very high- but also very low-frequency sound to stun their prey. In 2000, Dr. Vincent Janik of St. Andrews University in Scotland was studying bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Scotland's Moray Firth. He announced that they give voice to a distinctive low-frequency braying noise almost exclusively at feeding times. Since dolphins themselves are not sensitive to low sonic frequencies, Janik speculates that the dolphins emit these particular sound waves to stun their prey." (Shuker 2001:23)
Learn more about this functional adaptation.
- Shuker, KPN. 2001. The Hidden Powers of Animals: Uncovering the Secrets of Nature. London: Marshall Editions Ltd. 240 p.
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Molecular Biology
Barcode data: Tursiops truncatus
There are 3 barcode sequences available from BOLD and GenBank. Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species. See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.
-- end --
Download FASTA File
Trusted
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Tursiops truncatus
Public Records: 3
Specimens with Barcodes: 3
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
IUCN Red List Assessment
Red List Category
Red List Criteria
Version
Year Assessed
Assessor/s
Reviewer/s
Contributor/s
Justification
A recent quantitative threat assessment concluded the Fiordland Bottlenose Dolphin subpopulation qualifies as Critically Endangered on the basis of the number of mature individuals and the predicted rate of subpopulation decline over three generations. The subpopulation contained 205 individuals in 2008, of which 123 were mature. Further, a majority of Population Viability Analysis (PVA) model runs (67.6%) indicated a decline of more than 25% over one generation, with a significant number (36.2%) also exhibiting a decline of more than 80% over three generations (Currey et al. 2009).
Trusted
IUCN Red List Assessment
Red List Category
Red List Criteria
Version
Year Assessed
Assessor/s
Reviewer/s
Contributor/s
Justification
History
- 1996Data Deficient(Baillie and Groombridge 1996)
- 1994Insufficiently Known(Groombridge 1994)
Trusted
Bottlenosed dolphins in the United States are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. The goal of this Act is to allow marine species to obtain optimum sustainable population levels keeping in mind the carrying capacity of the habitat. Anyone who removes a marine animal (e.g., a dolphin) without proper procedure faces fines up to $20,000 or periods of incarceration up to one year. Bottlenosed dolphins are also protected under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Bill of 1998 in Australia. This bill is applied to waters up to 200 miles from the shores of Australia. It involves environmental impact assessments, conservation of biodiversity and endangered species as well as management of protected areas. Bottlenosed dolphins are found in most waters and so are protected by many different laws in a large number of countries. Although there are laws that protect bottlenosed dolphins, humans need to become more aware of the way our daily lives affect the livelihood of dolphins. Much of the environmental contamination found in the habitats of bottlenose dolphins are caused by humans. Common pollutants found in the tissues of dolphin are polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), used as dielectric fluids in coolants, lubricators and transformers, and pesticide DDTs (1,1-bis-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethane). Eighty percent of the total amount of these toxins in a female dolphin may be transferred through breast milk to its calf, causing suppression of the immune system or in some cases death. It is one thing to make sure that we are not removing dolphins from their habitats but it is also important to make sure their habitats are not being destroyed by our negligence.
US Federal List: no special status
CITES: appendix i; no special status
State of Michigan List: no special status
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: least concern
Trusted
National NatureServe Conservation Status
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: N4 - Apparently Secure
Trusted
NatureServe Conservation Status
Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure
Reasons: Widespread and common in many areas worldwide.
Trusted
Status
Trusted
U.S. Stocks
There are currently eleven stocks of Tursiops truncatus in U.S. waters, five of which occur in the Gulf of Mexico. The Western North Atlantic Coastal stock is listed under the Marine Mammal Protection Act as "depleted" i.e., below its optimum sustainable population.
- NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources: Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)
- http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/mammals/cetaceans/bottlenosedolphin.htm
Unreviewed
Trends
Population
In 2008, the Fiordland subpopulation was estimated to contain 205 individuals (95% CI: 192–219) of which 123 (95% CI: 108–140) were estimated to be mature (Currey et al. 2009). These estimates were derived using abundance estimates for the three discrete local units that comprise the Fiordland subpopulation’s range:
- Northern Fiordland local unit - 47 individuals (95% CI: 35–63) in 2003 (Boisseau 2003).
- Doubtful-Thompson Sound local unit - 56 individuals (95% CI: 55–57) in 2008 (Currey & Rowe 2008);
- Dusky-Breaksea Sound local unit - 102 individuals (95% CI: 100–104) in 2008 (Currey et al. 2008a);
All estimates were produced using similar capture-recapture analyses of photo-identification data (Williams et al. 1993, Currey et al. 2007). In the case of Doubtful-Thompson Sound and Dusky-Breaksea Sound, capture-recapture analyses were complemented with a complete photo-identification census, yielding identical abundance estimates. A stochastic simulation approach was employed to account for temporal variability since abundance was last directly estimated in Northern Fiordland (Currey et al. 2009). The number of mature individuals was estimated via simulation using the abundance estimate for Fiordland and an estimate that the 60% of the subpopulation was mature (Taylor et al. 2007).
Dolphin abundance has declined by an estimated 34–39% over the 12 years to 2007 for the Doubtful-Thompson Sound local unit (Currey et al. 2007). The key demographic cause of this decline was a reduction in the survival of calves in the first year of life since 2002 (Currey et al. 2008b), coupled with a reduction in recruitment that reflected both reduced calf survival (less than one year old) and a separate reduction in juvenile survival (1–3 years old) prior to 2002 (Currey et al. submitted). The present level of calf survival (0.3750; 95% CI: 0.2080–0.5782) is thought to be the lowest recorded for Bottlenose Dolphins. Further, the reduction in calf survival since 2002 has resulted in a more than 100-fold increase in the risk of extirpation in Doubtful Sound over the next 50 years (from 0.3% of model runs to 41.5%; Currey et al. 2008b).
Population trends have been estimated for the Fiordland subpopulation via population viability analysis (Currey et al. 2009). Stochastic Leslie matrix models were constructed using Fiordland-specific demographic rates (Currey et al. 2008b), accounting for parameter uncertainty as well as demographic and environmental stochasticity (Currey et al. 2009). The results of the models were pooled across four different scenarios that reflected differing levels of calf survival and movement across the local units (see Currey et al. 2009 for details). More than 80% of model runs resulted in subpopulation decline over one generation (88.4%), three generations (84.6%) or five generations (83.2%).
On average, the Fiordland subpopulation was projected to decline by 31.4% over one generation, with the majority of model runs (67.6%) exceeding a decline of 25% (Currey et al. 2009). The Fiordland subpopulation was projected to decline by an average of up to 81.2% over three generations, depending on the level of movement between local units and survival rates of calves and sub-adults (Currey et al. 2009). Across all scenarios, 36.2% of model runs exceeded a decline of 80% and the most frequent model outcomes were within this range (Currey et al. 2009). The average risk of extinction for the Fiordland Bottlenose Dolphin subpopulation was estimated at 10.1% over five generations, and as much as 22.5% depending on the level of movement between local units and survival rates of calves and sub-adults (Currey et al. 2009).
Population Trend
Trusted
Population
U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service surveys have estimated 52,000 bottlenose dolphins in the northern Gulf of Mexico (3,708 [CV=42%] in oceanic waters beyond the shelf edge (Mullin 2006), 25,320 [CV=26%] on the outer continental shelf, 17,602 in coastal waters, and 5,063 in estuaries, bays, and channels – Waring et al. 2008). There are approximately 126,000 off the eastern coast of North America (including 81,588 [CV=17%] in offshore waters and 32,533 (winter) to 43,951 (summer) in coastal waters – Waring et al. 2008). Pacific surveys found 243,500 (CV=29%) in the eastern tropical Pacific (Wade and Gerrodette 1993), 3,215 (CV= 59%) off Hawaii (Barlow 2006), 323 (CV=13%) in coastal California waters (Dudzik et al. 2006), and an average of about 2,000 (CV = 44%) in the offshore waters of California/Oregon/Washington (Barlow and Forney in press). Japanese surveys found 168,000 (CV=26%) in the Northwestern Pacific west of 180ºE, including 36,791 (CV=25%) in Japanese coastal waters (Miyashita 1993). In the eastern Sulu Sea, Dolar et al (2006) estimated 2,628. Approximately 900 bottlenose dolphins were found along 400 km of coastal waters off KwaZulu-Natal (however, many of these may have been T. aduncus - Reyes 1991; Wells and Scott 1999).
Total abundance in the Mediterranean is unknown but thought to be in the low 10,000s based on observed densities in areas that have been surveyed (Bearzi and Fortuna 2006). Surveys in the northwestern Mediterranean estimated 7,654 (CV=45%) present (Forcada et al. 2004). An estimated 584 (CV=28%) occur in the Alboran Sea (Cañadas and Hammond 2006). Mediterranean bottlenose dolphins exhibit population structure, based on toxicology and diet (Borrell et al. 2005) and genetics (Natoli et al. 2005).
The total population size in the Black Sea is unknown. However, there are recent abundance estimates for parts of the range suggesting that population size is at least several thousands (Birkun 2006).
Preliminary estimates from the late 1980s indicate about 1,000 dolphins occur around the Faroe Islands (Sigurjónsson et al. 1989; Sigurjónsson and Gunnlaugsson 1990, Bloch and Mikkelsen 2000). Estimates of inshore bottlenose dolphins along the European Atlantic coasts total at least 610 individuals (Liret et al. 1998; Wilson et al. 1999; Grellier and Wilson 2003; Evans et al. 2002; Ingram 2000; White and Webb 1995, Baines et al. 2002; Gaspar 2003). A wide-scale survey in 2005 of western European continental shelf waters including the western Baltic, North Sea and Atlantic margin as far as southern Spain estimated that there were 12,600 bottlenose dolphins in this area (CV=27%, P. Hammond pers. comm..). Minimum estimates exist for other small areas around the world: for example, 122 (95% CI = 114-140) off Belize (Kerr et al. 2005) and 66 in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand (Hase and Schneider 2001).
Population Trend
Trusted
Global Short Term Trend: Relatively stable (=10% change)
Comments: Local declines have occurred but overall relatively stable.
Trusted
Threats
The Fiordland Bottlenose Dolphins are known to be exposed to:
- disturbance and boat strikes associated with boat-based tourism in Milford and Doubtful Sounds;
- increased freshwater discharge into Doubtful Sound from hydroelectric power generation;
- reduced prey availability caused by environmental degradation and overfishing throughout Fiordland.
Given that the effects of these threats are largely indirect, their influence on population trends is technically challenging to quantify. However, the cumulative impact appears likely to result in ongoing population declines within the Doubtful-Thompson Sound local unit (Currey et al. 2008b, Currey et al. 2009).
Tourism in Fiordland is increasing (Lusseau and Higham 2004). Tour boats have been demonstrated to have direct impacts on the behaviour of dolphins in Doubtful Sound, increasing the dive interval of both males and females (Lusseau 2003c), as well as disturbing resting and socialising behaviours, resulting in increased travelling (Lusseau 2003a). Tourism also appears to have influenced the residency patterns of the northern Fiordland Bottlenose Dolphins, with the dolphins avoiding the fiord entirely when tour boat activity is at its peak (Lusseau 2005). In both Milford and Doubtful Sounds, dolphins have been observed with scars from boat strikes and in one case, a calf was killed by a boat strike (Lusseau et al. 2002, Boisseau 2003). This evidence led the International Whaling Commission Scientific Committee to issue a consensus statement that whale watching and vessel traffic have a significant impact on this subpopulation (IWC Scientific Committee report 2006).
In response to these observed impacts, in 2006 a voluntary code of practice was established for tour boats in Milford and Doubtful Sounds to improve boat behaviour around the dolphins. This was formalised into a Code of Management for Doubtful Sound in January 2008, including Dolphin Protection Zones (DPZs) in which vessel activity is limited. These zones extend 200m out from shore in regions of the fiord that include some of the local unit’s most frequently used habitats (Lusseau and Higham 2004, Lusseau et al. 2006). The Code of Management is voluntary at present, and of unknown efficacy. Non-compliance with the Marine Mammals Protection Act 1978 (i.e. excessive boat speeds, unsafe approaches to dolphin groups) has been frequently observed in Fiordland in the past (Lusseau 2003a, 2006), and voluntary codes of practice appear to be of limited effectiveness in other locations (Scarpaci et al. 2003, Scarpaci et al. 2004, Whitt and Read 2006, Wiley et al. 2008). Given these factors, the negative effects of boat-based tourism are therefore likely to continue in Milford and Doubtful Sounds.
The isolation of the Dusky-Breaksea local unit ensures that these dolphins are presently exposed to fewer tour boat interactions than neighbouring local units. However, as tourism activities have increased in the most accessible parts of Fiordland, they have begun to spill over to more remote regions, such as Dusky Sound. Large vessels and helicopters now regularly visit for multi-day hunting, fishing and sightseeing trips. The impacts (if any) from these activities are presently unclear, although the effects observed elsewhere in Fiordland suggest impacts are likely to occur, or may already be occurring.
In addition to tour boat activity, the Doubtful-Thompson Sound local unit is subject to the effects of freshwater discharge from the Lake Manapouri hydroelectric power station tailrace. The tailrace discharge into Deep Cove, Doubtful Sound, is c. 450-510 cumecs (cubic metres per second), two to three times larger than the mean inflow from precipitation, and results in a distinct low-salinity layer significantly deeper than found in neighbouring fiords (Gibbs et al. 2000, Gibbs 2001). The low-salinity layer shows significant seasonal temperature variation, from 14–16°C in summer to 8-10°C in winter at a depth of 1 m (and occasionally freezing over in winter), while the underlying marine waters maintain a relatively constant 13–15°C year round at 25 m (Gibbs 2001, Peake et al. 2001).
A marked reduction in calf survival observed in the Doubtful-Thompson Sound local unit, from 0.8621 (95% CI: 0.6851–0.9473) to 0.3750 (95% CI: 0.2080–0.5782) coincided with the opening of a second tailrace tunnel for the hydroelectric power station (Currey et al. 2008b). That the second tailrace increased the mean discharge only marginally (9.7% greater between 2002 and 2007 than between 1969 and 2001, but only 2.7% greater than between 1972 and 2001; Merdian Energy unpublished data) has been used to argue that it was not the cause (DuFresne and Mattlin 2009). Circumstantial evidence suggesting an impact of increased freshwater input includes four times higher severity of skin lesions in the Doubtful-Thompson Sound local unit than in the Dusky-Breaksea Sound local unit, smaller calves and more restricted calving season in Doubtful-Thompson Sound, and a less clear seasonal pattern of habitat use in Dusky-Breaksea sound (Rowe et al. 2008), all of which are consistent with increased exposure to cold fresh water. The additional freshwater has had other ecological effects, altering sub-tidal community structure within Doubtful Sound, resulting in declines in species richness (Boyle et al. 2001, Tallis et al. 2004, Rutger and Wing 2006).
Historical fishing practices have also affected Fiordland’s marine environment, resulting in significant declines in fish abundance throughout Fiordland (Beentjes and Carbines 2005). This was one of the main reasons for the establishment of eight new marine reserves in Fiordland in 2005, with two of the new reserves created in Doubtful-Thompson Sound and a further two in Dusky-Breaksea Sound. The cumulative effects of historical fishing practices and altered community structure on the resident dolphins may be significant, given that they rely on productivity from within the fiord (Lusseau and Wing 2006).
In addition to anthropogenic threats, the Fiordland Bottlenose Dolphins face the inherent risks associated with small subpopulation size and residing at the edge of the species’ range. Small subpopulation size increases vulnerability to stochastic effects such as demographic stochasticity, environmental stochasticity, catastrophes and genetic deterioration (Caughley 1994, Hedrick et al. 1996), all of which can result in increased extinction risk, even in the absence of further human impacts. Residing at the southern-most limit of the species’ range may also have significant implications for subpopulation viability. If the habitat is marginal, it may result in increased energetic costs – a factor that may help to explain the apparent energy limitation observed among females in Doubtful-Thompson Sound (Lusseau 2003c). Further, there is the risk that in time, the subpopulation’s existing range may be rendered suboptimal by climate change.
Trusted
The only Mediterranean area with quantitative historical information is the northern Adriatic Sea, where bottlenose dolphins likely have declined by at least 50% over the past 50 years, largely as a consequence of historical killing in extermination campaigns to reduce competition for fish, followed by habitat degradation and overfishing. The extermination campaigns were conducted until the early 1960s (Bearzi et al. 2004; Bearzi and Fortuna 2006). For the north-western Mediterranean, the available information suggests similar trends (Bearzi and Fortuna 2006).
Drive fisheries have been reported from the Faroe Islands and Japan. Up to 308 are taken annually in the Faroe Islands drive fishery (dating back to 1803), often with long-finned pilot whales (Reyes 1991; Bloch 1998). Drive and harpoon fisheries in Japan catch bottlenose dolphins for human consumption and to remove perceived competition with commercial fisheries (Wells and Scott 1999). Average catch from 1995-2004 was 594 per annum (Kasuya 2007).
The Black Sea subspecies has had extensive directed takes for commercial products (Kleinenberg 1956; Tomilin 1957; Buckland et al. 1992), including takes of at least 24,000-28,000 during 1946-1983 in the Black Sea off Turkey. However, the total number of dolphins killed was certainly much greater (probably by tens of thousands) as figures do not include, or only partially include, catch statistics from other Black Sea countries (Birkun 2006).
Live capture of common bottlenose dolphins for public display, research, and military applications have occurred in several parts of the species' range. Worldwide estimates of removal are unavailable, but more than 1,500 were caught in United States, Mexican, and Bahamian waters through 1980 (Leatherwood and Reeves 1982; Fisher and Reeves 2005). Some live-capture removals continue in other countries including Cuba where at least 238 were captured in 1986-2004 (Van Waerebeek et al. 2006), the Solomon Islands, Japan, and China (Wells and Scott 1999; R.S. Wells pers. comm.). Live-capture removal of Black Sea bottlenose dolphins, including mortality during capture operations, is estimated at 1,000-2,000 since the early 1960s. Live-captures continue in the Russian Federation, with 10-20 animals taken annually from a small area in the Kerch Strait, Russia (Birkun 2002a, 2006). According to CITES statistics, at least 92 individuals were removed from the Black Sea region during 1990-1999 (Reeves et al. 2003), and Russia reportedly has exported at least 66 for travelling shows since 1997 (Fisher and Reeves 2005).
Incidental catches of common bottlenose dolphins are known from throughout the species’ range, in gillnets, driftnets, purse seines, trawls, long-lines, and on hook-and-line gear used in commercial and recreational fisheries, but the level of mortality is often poorly documented (Wells and Scott 1999). Gillnet and purse-seine fisheries off Peru take an unknown number annually. An estimated 42 common bottlenose dolphins were taken and landed at Cerro Azul, a Peruvian port, in 1994; while an annual gillnet fisheries bycatch of 227 animals was estimated for the Gulf of Guayaquil, Ecuador, also in 1994 (Van Waerebeek et al. 1997). The estimated annual incidental mortality in the eastern tropical Pacific fishery for tuna ranged up to almost 200, but the mortality has declined to less than 10 since 1998 (M. Scott pers. comm.). Incidental catches in Chinese fisheries reach several hundred per year (Yang et al. 1999). Coastal gillnets and shark drift gillnets in the mid-Atlantic region of the US take on average 66 annually (Waring et al. 2008). They are taken incidentally in gillnets in Sri Lanka (Ilangakoon 1997). Taiwanese coastal and distant water longline fisheries for tuna and sharks take bottlenose dolphins incidentally (for the latter, the origin of the animals is unknown), as do a variety of gillnets, including driftnets (Wang and Yang 2002; J. Wang pers. comm.).
Annual Black Sea bottlenose dolphin incidental mortality in bottom-set gillnets from 1946 through the 1980s is roughly estimated in the hundreds. The scale of this mortality almost certainly increased in the 1990s-2000s owing to the rapid expansion of illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (Birkun 2006). According to Öztürk (1999) at least 200-300 bottlenose dolphins per year may be taken incidentally in Turkish fisheries in a variety of fishing nets, especially bottom-set gill nets.
Common bottlenose dolphins in coastal areas are exposed to a wide variety of threats in addition to direct and indirect takes. Threats that are cause for concern include: 1) the toxic effects of xenobiotic chemicals; 2) reduced prey availability caused by environmental degradation and overfishing (Pauly et al. 1998; Jackson et al. 2001); 3) direct and indirect disturbance and harassment (e.g. boat traffic and commercial dolphin watching and interactive programs); 4) marine construction and demolition and 5) other forms of habitat destruction and degradation (including anthropogenic noise). Although these and other threats are technically challenging to quantify by comparison with takes, their cumulative impact is likely to result in longitudinal population declines. Lack of historical data in many cases hampers understanding of long term trends, possibly resulting in shifting baselines. The contribution of anthropogenic factors to an increasing number of Unusual Mortality Events involving bottlenose dolphins remains to be determined (Spradlin et al. 2005).
Environmental contaminants likely impact health and reproductive success of the common bottlenose dolphins in parts of its range. Lahvis et al. (1995) correlated concentrations of PCBs and DDT in the blood of inshore bottlenose dolphins with decline in immune system function. Males in some areas such as Florida accumulate levels of PCBs more than an order of magnitude greater than the threshold for adverse health effects identified by Kannan et al. (2000) (Wells et al. 2005). A risk assessment relative to PCB burdens suggested elevated probabilities of first-born mortality at several sites in the U.S. (Schwacke et al. 2002; Wells et al. 2005).
Bottlenose dolphins sometimes forage around fish-farm cages or take fish from gillnets (e.g., Reeves et al. 2001; Read et al. 2003), commercial trawling gear, crab traps, or recreational fishing gear (Wells and Scott 1999). This can result in incidental mortality through entanglement and ingestion of fishing gear.
Trusted
Degree of Threat: C : Not very threatened throughout its range, communities often provide natural resources that when exploited alter the composition and structure over the short-term, or communities are self-protecting because they are unsuitable for other uses
Comments: Incurs low to moderate levels of direct exploitation and incidental take in fisheries (Leatherwood and Reeves 1983, Jefferson et al. 1993). See Duignan et al. (1996) for information on recurrent epizootics of morbillivirus infections in the western Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico.
Trusted
Trusted
Management
Conservation Actions
Given the three Fiordland local units are subject to different types and levels of impact, they require different management interventions specific to each location.
The Doubtful-Thompson local unit shows behavioural and demographic evidence of impacts associated with interactions with tour boats and freshwater discharge from a hydroelectric power station (Lusseau et al. 2006, Currey et al. 2008b). These impacts are present throughout much of the range of this local unit. Reducing and effectively regulating freshwater discharge and tour boat activity, especially at times and in locations where the local unit is most susceptible to disturbance would help to reduce these impacts (Lusseau and Higham 2004, Currey et al. 2008b).
The Northern Fiordland local unit is subject to intense tour boat activity in part of its range (Milford Sound) and apparently responds by vacating the fiord over the hours of the day and seasons of the year when tour boat activity reaches its peak (Lusseau 2005). Minimising tour boat interactions in Milford Sound in combination with an assessment of impacts outside the fiord would help to reduce risk for this local unit.
The Dusky-Breaksea local unit is presently exposed to fewer tour boat interactions than neighbouring local units, however this is changing. Increasing tourism activity (Lusseau and Higham 2004), coupled with possible historical effects of prey depletion (Beentjes and Carbines 2005), suggest that this local unit may be vulnerable in the future. Precautionary management of tourism and further assessment to ascertain any additional sources of impact are appropriate actions for this local unit.
While is it important to identify the issues faced by each local unit, it is also vital to consider the cumulative effects of these impacts and the resulting consequences for each local unit. Potential impacts have the potential to interact, with effects that may either mitigate or exacerbate overall impacts. This has two key consequences for subpopulation management: increasing ambiguity as to which particular activities are impacting on the subpopulation and potentially increasing the risk to the subpopulation (Thompson et al. 2000). Management of the Fiordland bottlenose dolphins should consider all potential sources of impact when deciding on the appropriate management regime for each separate impact. A comprehensive management approach that addresses the conservation requirements of each individual local unit should provide the best chance of ensuring the survival of the Fiordland bottlenose dolphins.
Trusted
Conservation Actions
The bottlenose dolphin has been afforded special protected status under Annex II of the European Union’s Habitats Directive. Commercial hunting of Black Sea cetaceans including bottlenose dolphins was banned in 1966 in the former USSR, Bulgaria and Romania, and in 1983 in Turkey.
Trusted
Conservation
Trusted
Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems
Benefits
Economic Importance for Humans: Negative
There are no known adverse effects of Tursiops truncatus on humans.
Trusted
Economic Importance for Humans: Positive
Humans receive a considerable amount of economic gain from bottlenosed dolphins. They are often used in captivity to swim with humans and perform. Dolphins are used in tours in which participants are educated about the lives of dolphins and encouraged to preserve their livelihood and habitat. Bottlenosed dolphins have also been known to fish cooperatively with humans, letting Brazilian fishermen, for example, know when and where to drop their nets. Bottlenosed dolphins are even used for research by the U.S. Navy on echolocation and thermoregulation. These research dolphins have also helped navy divers to find submerged objects in the ocean. Research on bottlenosed dolphins has contributed substantially to our understanding of social communication and behavior and the nature of intelligence.
Positive Impacts: ecotourism ; research and education
Trusted
Economic Uses
Comments: Most commonly displayed cetacean in marine aquaria. Historically has been harvested for meat, leather, oil, and meal. Today the main directed fishery is in Japanese waters, producing meat for human consumption; limited direct take occurs in many other parts of the range (IUCN 1991). Blamed for damage to fisheries and fishing gear in many areas (see IUCN 1991 for examples), but claims of damage are not always adequately substantiated.
Trusted
Risks
IUCN Red List Category
-
IUCN (2008) Cetacean update of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=125373
Trusted
Wikipedia
Common bottlenose dolphin
Tursiops truncatus, commonly known as the common bottlenose dolphin or more commonly the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (and in older literature simply as the bottlenose dolphin, a term now applied to the genus), is the most well-known species from the family Delphinidae.
Common bottlenose dolphins are the most familiar dolphins due to the wide exposure they receive in captivity in marine parks and dolphinaria, and in movies and television programs.[3] T. truncatus is the largest species of the beaked dolphins.[4] They inhabit temperate and tropical oceans throughout the world, and are absent only from polar waters.[3][4][5][6][7] All bottlenose dolphins were previously known as T. truncatus, but recently the genus has been split into two, T. truncatus and T. aduncus.[6][7] Although this species has been traditionally called the bottlenose dolphin,[8][9] many authors have used the name common bottlenose dolphin for this species since a second bottlenose dolphins species, the Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin, was described.[1][10][11] The dolphins inhabit warm and temperate seas worldwide. Considerable genetic variation has been described among members of this species, even between neighboring populations, and so many experts believe multiple species may be included within T. truncatus.[8][10]
Contents |
Description
The common bottlenose dolphin is grey in color and may be between 2 and 4 m (6.6 and 13 ft) long, and weigh between 150 and 650 kg (330 and 1,400 lb).[9] Males are generally larger and heavier than females. In most parts of the world the adult's length is between 2.5 and 3.5 m (8.2 and 11 ft) with weight ranges between 200 and 500 kg (440 and 1,100 lb).[4][10] Newborn calves are between 0.8 and 1.4 m (2 ft 7 in and 4 ft 7 in) long and weigh between 15 and 30 kg (33 and 66 lb).[10] The dolphins have a short and well-defined snout that looks like an old-fashioned gin bottle, which is the source for their common name.[12] Like all whales and dolphins, though, the snout is not a functional nose, which has evolved instead into the blowhole on the top of their heads. Their necks are more flexible than other dolphins' due to five of their seven vertebrae not being fused together as is seen in other dolphin species.[13]
Behavior
Common bottlenose dolphins live in groups called pods that typically number about 15 individuals, but group size varies from pairs of dolphins to over 100 or even occasionally over 1000 animals for short periods of time.[10] Their diets consist mainly of eels, squid, shrimp and wide variety of fishes.[1][5] They do not chew their food, instead they swallow it whole. Dolphin groups often work as a team to harvest schools of fish, but they also hunt individually. Dolphins search for prey primarily using echolocation, which is similar to sonar. They emit clicking sounds and listen for the return echos to determine the location and shape of nearby items, including potential prey.[14] Dolphins also use sound for communication, including squeaks and whistles emitted from the blowhole and sounds emitted through body language, such as leaping from the water and slapping their tails on the water. Their heads contain an oily substance that acts as an acoustic lens, as well as protecting the brain case.
Distribution
T. truncatus can be found in the warm and temperate tropical oceans worldwide.[15] Some bottlenose populations live closer to the shore (inshore populations) and others live further out to sea (offshore populations). Generally, offshore populations are larger, darker, and have proportionally shorter fins and beaks. Offshore poulations can migrate up to 4,200 km (2,600 mi) in a season, but inshore populations tend to move less. However, some inshore populations make long migrations in response to El Niño southern oscillation events.[10]
Intelligence
T. truncatus has a bigger brain than humans.[16] Numerous investigations of bottlenose dolphin intelligence include tests of mimicry, use of artificial language, object categorization, and self-recognition.[17][18][19][20][21][22] This intelligence has driven considerable interaction with humans. Common bottlenose dolphins are popular in aquarium shows and television programs such as Flipper.[23] They have also been trained for military uses such as locating sea mines or detecting and marking enemy divers, as for example in the U.S. Navy Marine Mammal Program.[24][25] In some areas they cooperate with local fishermen by driving fish toward the fishermen and eating the fish that escape the fishermen's nets.[26]
Other human interactions
Some interactions with humans are harmful to the dolphins. In the town of Taiji, Japan, up to 2,300 are hunted for food annually.[27] Also, the dolphins are sometimes killed inadvertently as a bycatch of tuna fishing.[28][29]
Conservation
The North Sea, Baltic, Mediterranean and Black Sea populations of the common bottlenose dolphin are listed on Appendix II[30] of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) of the Bonn Convention), since they have an unfavorable conservation status or would benefit significantly from international cooperation organized by tailored agreements.[31]
The species is covered by the Agreement on Small Cetaceans of the Baltic, North East Atlantic, Irish and North Seas (ASCOBANS), the Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans in the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Contiguous Atlantic Area (ACCOBAMS), the Memorandum of Understanding for the Conservation of Cetaceans and Their Habitats in the Pacific Islands Region,[32] and the Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Conservation of the Manatee and Small Cetaceans of Western Africa and Macaronesia.[33]
See also
References
- ^ a b c Wells, R. and Scott, M. (2002). "Bottlenose Dolphins". In Perrin, W.; Wursig, B. and Thewissen, J. Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. Academic Press. pp. 122–127. ISBN 0-12-551340-2.
- ^ Hammond, P.S., Bearzi, G., Bjørge, A., Forney, K., Karczmarski, L., Kasuya, T., Perrin, W.F., Scott, M.D., Wang, J.Y., Wells, R.S. & Wilson, B. (2008). Tursiops truncatus. In: IUCN 2008. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Retrieved 7 October 2008.
- ^ a b Leatherwood, S., & Reeves, R. (1990). The Bottlenose Dolphin. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc., ISBN 0-12-440280-1
- ^ a b c Jenkins, J. (2009) Tursiops truncatus. Animal Diversity Web.
- ^ a b Anonymous. (2002) Bottlenose Dolphin. Retrieved January 17, 2009, from Sea World Web: http://www.seaworld.org/infobooks/Bottlenose/
- ^ a b Hammond, P., Bearzi, G., Bjørge, A., Forney, K., Karczmarski, L., Kasuya, T., et al. (2008). Tursiops truncatus. Retrieved January 17, 2009, from IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: http://www.iucnredlist.org
- ^ a b Klinowska, M. (1991). Dolphins, Porpoises and Whales of the World: The IUCN Red Data Book. Gland, Switzerland, U.K.: IUCN, ISBN 2880329361
- ^ a b Mead, J. G.; Brownell, R. L., Jr. (2005). "Order Cetacea". In Wilson, D. E.; Reeder, D. M. Mammal Species of the World (3rd ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 723–743. ISBN 978-0-8018-8221-0. OCLC 62265494.
- ^ a b American Cetacean Society Fact Sheet – Bottlenose Dolphin
- ^ a b c d e f Shirihai, H. and Jarrett, B. (2006). Whales Dolphins and Other Marine Mammals of the World. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. pp. 155–158. ISBN 0-691-12757-3.
- ^ Reeves, R.; Stewart, B.; Clapham, P.; Powell, J. (2002). National Audubon Society Guide to Marine Mammals of the World. New York: A.A. Knopf. pp. 362–365. ISBN 0-375-41141-0.
- ^ Tursiops truncatus, Bottlenose Dolphin. MarineBio.org.
- ^ Wells, R.S. (2006). American Cetacean Society Fact Sheet: Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).
- ^ Au, Whitlow (1993). The Sonar of Dolphins. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 038797835 Check
|isbn=value (help). - ^ Scott, M., & Chivers, S. (1990). "Distribution and Herd Structure of Bottlenose Dolphins in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean", pp. 387–402 in S. Leatherwood, & R. Reeves, The Bottlenose Dolphin, San Diego: Academic Press, Inc., ISBN 0-12-440280-1
- ^ Marino, Lori; Connor, Richard C.; Fordyce, R. Ewan; Herman, Louis M.; Hof, Patrick R.; Lefebvre, Louis; Lusseau, David; McCowan, Brenda et al. (2007). "Cetaceans Have Complex Brains for Complex Cognition". PLoS Biology 5 (5): e139. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050139. PMC 1868071. PMID 17503965.
- ^ Reiss, Diana; McCowan, Brenda (September 1993). "Spontaneous Vocal Mimicry and Production by Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): Evidence for Vocal Learning". J Comp Psychol 107 (3): 301–12. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.107.3.301. PMID 8375147.
- ^ "The Dolphin Institute — Behavioral Mimicry". Retrieved 2008-08-31.
- ^ Herman, L. (2002). "Language Learning". In Perrin, W.; Wursig, B. and Thewissen, J. Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. Academic Press. pp. 685–689. ISBN 0-12-551340-2.
- ^ "The Dolphin Institute — Understanding Language". Retrieved 2008-09-31.
- ^ "Intelligence and Humans". wiu.edu. Retrieved 2008-08-11.
- ^ Marten, K. & Psarakos, S. (2006). "Evidence of Self-awareness in the Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)". In Parker, S. T., Mitchell, R. & Boccia, M. Self-awareness in Animals and Humans: Developmental Perspectives. Cambridge University Press. pp. 361–379. ISBN 0521025915. Retrieved 2008-10-04.
- ^ "American Cetacean Society — Bottlenose Dolphin". Archived from the original on 2008-07-25. Retrieved 2008-08-31.
- ^ "U.S. Navy Marine Mammal Program Web Site". U.S. Navy Marine Mammal Program. Retrieved 2000-01-18.
- ^ "Dolphins Deployed as Undersea Agents in Iraq". National Geographic. Retrieved 2009-01-18.
- ^ "Bottlenose Dolphin". Archived from the original on 2008-04-21. Retrieved 2008-08-11.
- ^ "Save Japan Dolphins". Retrieved 2008-09-30.
- ^ Kenyon, P. (2004-11-08). "Dining with the dolphin hunters". BBC News. Retrieved 2008-09-30.
- ^ "The Dolphin Institute — Threats to the Bottlenose Dolphin and Other Marine Mammals". Retrieved 2008-09-30.
- ^ "Appendix II" of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). As amended by the Conference of the Parties to the Bonn Convention in 1985, 1988, 1991, 1994, 1997, 1999, 2002, 2005 and 2008. Effective: 5 March 2009.
- ^ Convention on Migratory Species page on the common bottlenose dolphin. Cms.int (2000-02-18). Retrieved on 2013-04-01.
- ^ Pacific Cetaceans MoU. Pacificcetaceans.org. Retrieved on 2013-04-01.
- ^ Western African Aquatic Mammals MoU. Cms.int (2008-10-03). Retrieved on 2013-04-01.
Further reading
- Heptner, V. G.; Nasimovich, A. A; Bannikov, Andrei Grigorevich; Hoffmann, Robert S, Mammals of the Soviet Union, Volume II, part 3 (1996). Washington, D.C. : Smithsonian Institution Libraries and National Science Foundation
- Ryan, C., Rongan, E. and Cross, T. 2010. The use of Cork Harbour by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus (Montagu, 1821)) Ir Nat. J. 31: 1 – 9.
- Berrow, S.D. 2009. Winter distribution of Bottle-nosed Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus (Montagu)) in the inner Shannon Estuary. Ir. Nat. J. 30: 35 – 39.
Unreviewed
Hiapo
Hiapo (c. November 13, 1983 – February 25, 2004) was a male Atlantic bottlenose dolphin, who along with a companion female dolphin named Elele, as well as tankmates Phoenix and Akeakamai, were the subjects of Louis Herman's animal language studies at the Kewalo Basin Marine Mammal Laboratory in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. The most well known paper is the original work described in Herman, Richards, & Wolz (1984). Hiapo was also the subject of many other scientific studies of dolphin cognition and sensory abilities.
Physically identifying features of Hiapo included a five o'clock shadow on his throat, also sometimes described as the outline of a handsome dolphin tuxedo, a dorsal fin that drooped to the left, and a particularly large fluke and tail. In the Hawaiian language, Hiapo means first born son.
Contents |
See also
Notes
- ^ Vorsino, Mary (February 26, 2004). "Last dolphin dies at marine laboratory". starbulletin.com. Honolulu Star-Bulletin. http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/02/26/news/story3.html. Retrieved June 24, 2012.
References
Media and Press Appearances
- Hiapo can be seen in: National Geographic's Dolphins with Robin Williams, BBC's Wildlife on One's Dolphins: Deep Thinkers with David Attenborough, ABC's Touched by a Dolphin with Sharon Lawrence, The Discoverers IMAX, Dolphins IMAX, and NOVA.
Unreviewed
Akeakamai
Akeakamai (c. 1976 – November 22, 2003) was a female Atlantic bottlenose dolphin, which, along with a companion female dolphin named Phoenix, as well as tankmates Elele and Hiapo, were the subjects of Louis Herman's animal language studies at the Kewalo Basin Marine Mammal Laboratory in Honolulu, Hawaii. The most well-known paper is the original work described in Herman, Richards, & Wolz (1984). Akeakamai was also the subject of many other scientific studies of dolphin cognition and sensory abilities.
Physically identifying features of Akeakamai included a straight eyeline, a half-circle-shaped notch in the right side of her tail fluke, a small "Eiffel Tower"-shaped mark above her right eye, a thin notch in the side of her upper mouth, and a particularly wide melon. She also had characteristic in-air whistle calls, including an unusual high-low-high whistle that was well below typical signature whistle frequencies. In the Hawaiian language, Akeakamai means "philosophy", or "lover (ake) of wisdom (akamai)". Akeakamai was also inserted as a character in David Brin's science fiction novel Startide Rising.
Akeakamai died of cancer on November 2, 2003.[1]
Contents |
See also
Notes
- ^ a b Save, Mike. "Lawsuit sparked by dolphin deaths reviewed last month". hawaii.edu. http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/uhtoday/spring2007/mikesave/dolphinstory.html. Retrieved June 24, 2012.
References
Media and Press Appearances
- Akeakamai can be seen in: National Geographic's Dolphins with Robin Williams, BBC's Wildlife on One's Dolphins: Deep Thinkers with David Attenborough, ABC's Touched by a Dolphin with Sharon Lawrence, The Discoverers IMAX, Dolphins IMAX, and NOVA.
Scientific References
- Cowan, R. (2003). Short-term memory for behavior in bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Unpublished Masters thesis. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
- Herman, L. M. (2002). Exploring the cognitive world of the bottlenosed dolphin. In M. Bekoff, C. Allen & G. Burghardt (Eds.) The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition. pp. 275–283. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Herman, L. M. (2002). Vocal, social, and self-imitation by bottlenosed dolphins. In C. Nehaniv & K. Dautenhahn (Eds.). Imitation in Animals and Artifacts. pp. 63–108. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press
- Mercado, E. III, Killebrew, D.A., Pack, A.A., Macha, I.V.B., Herman, L.M. (2000). Generalization of 'same-different' classification abilities in bottlenosed dolphins. Behavioural Processes, 50, 79-94.
- Herman, L.M., Abinchandani, S.L., Elhajj, A.E., Herman, E.Y.K., Sanchez, J.L., & Pack, A.A. (2000). Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referential character of the human pointing journal. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113(4), 347-364.
- Braslau-Schneck, S. (1994). Innovative Behaviors and Synchronization in Bottlenosed Dolphins. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
- Herman, L.M., Pack, A.A. & Wood, A. M. (1994). Bottlenosed Dolphins Can Generalize Rules and Develop Abstract Concepts. Marine Mammal Science, 10, 70-80.
- Herman, L.M., Kuczaj, S. A. II, & Holder, M. D. (1993). Responses to Anomalous Gestural Sequences by a Language-Trained Dolphin: Evidence for Processing of Semantic Relations and Syntactic Information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 122, 184-194.
- Herman, L. M., Pack A. A. & Morrel-Samuels, P. (1993). Representational and conceptual skills of dolphins. In H. R. Roitblat, L. M. Herman & P. Nachtigall (Eds) : Language and Communication: Comparative Perspectives, 273-298. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Holder, M. D., Herman, L. M. & Kuczaj, S. III (1993). A bottlenosed dolphin's responses to anomalous gestural sequences expressed within an artificial gestural language. In H. R. Roitblat, L. M. Herman & P. Nachtigall (Eds): Language and Communication: Comparative Perspectives, 299-308. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Morrel-Samuels, P. & Herman, L. M. (1993). Cognitive factors affecting comprehension of gesture language signs: A brief comparison of dolphins and humans. In H. R. Roitblat, L. M. Herman & P. Nachtigall (Eds): Language and Communication: Comparative Perspectives, 211-222. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Prince, C. G. (1993). Conjunctive Rule Comprehension in a Bottlenosed Dolphin. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
- Herman, L. M. (1990). Cognitive performance of dolphins in visually guided tasks. In J. A. Thomas and R. A. Kastelein (Eds.), Sensory abilities of cetaceans: Laboratory and field evidence, (pp. 455–462). New York: Plenum.
- Herman, L. M., Morrel Samuels, P. (1990). Knowledge acquisition and asymmetries between language comprehension and production: Dolphins and apes as a general model for animals. In M. Bekoff & D. Jamieson (Eds.), Interpretation and explanation in the study of behavior: Vol 1: Interpretation, intentionality, and commumication, 283-312. Boulder: Westview Press.
- Herman, L. M., Morrel-Samuels, P. and Pack, A. A. (1990). Bottlenosed dolphin and human recognition of veridical and degraded video displays of an artificial gestural language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 215-230.
- Shyan, M. R. and Herman, L. M. (1987). Determinants of recognition of gestural signs in an artificial language by Atlantic bottle-nosed dolphins (Tursiops turncatus) and humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101, 112-125.
- Herman, L. M. (1987). Receptive competences of language-trained animals. In J. S. Rosenblatt, C. Beer, M. C. Busnel, & P. J. B. Slater (Eds.), Advances in the Study of Behavior. Vol. 17, 1-60. Petaluma, CA: Academic Press.
- Herman, L. M., Richards, D. G. & Wolz, J. P. (1984). Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins. Cognition, 16, 129-219.
- Herman, L. M. and Forestell, P. H. (1985). Reporting presence or absence of named objects by a language-trained dolphin. Neuroscience and Bioehavioral Reviews, 9, 667-691.
Unreviewed
Names and Taxonomy
Taxonomy
Comments: Certain populations (e.g., subspecies gillii) have been regarded as distinct species by some authors, but most authors regard Tursiops as comprising a single, geographically variable species (Jones et al. 1992; Mead and Brownell, in Wilson and Reeder 1993) or two species (worldwide T. truncatus and Indian Ocean T. aduncus) (Rice 1998; Mead and Brownell, in Wilson and Reeder 2005).
LeDuc et al. (1999) used cytochrome b gene sequences to examine phylogenetic relationships among delphinids and found that Tursiops aduncus of the Indo-Pacific is distinct from Tursiops truncatus and moreover may be the sister species of Stenella frontalis; the genera Tursiops and Stenella as presently construed apear to be polyphyletic. Further taxonomic work is needed to resolve the relationships within the Delphininae before taxonomic revisions are made, other than recognizing T. aduncus as a distinct species.
Two forms are recognized, coastal and offshore. An offshore form exists between the 200- and 2000-m isobaths in distinct Gulf of Mexico and western North Atlantic stocks, whereas one or more coastal forms inhabit the waters inshore (Wells et al. 1999).
An opinion of the ICZN conserved the specific name truncatus and suppressed nesernack (see Mead and Brownell, in Wilson and Reeder 1993). See IUCN (1991) for further discussion of taxonomy.
Trusted



