Overview
Distribution
National Distribution
United States
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
Trusted
Global Range: (<100-250 square km (less than about 40-100 square miles)) Historical range: San Bernardino and San Jacinto valleys from Cajon Wash north of San Bernardino in San Bernardino County to Vallevista and Menifee valleys in Riverside County, California (Grinnell 1922, Lidicker 1960, Hall 1981), encompassing at least 130,587 hectares of suitable habitat (USFWS 2000). The largest remaining populations are along Santa Ana River, Lytle and Cajon washes, and the San Jacinto River; smaller populations are restricted to City Creek, Etiwanda alluvial fan and wash, Reiche Canyon, and south Bloomington (USFWS 2000). The total area occupied in 1997 was at least 6576 hectares (USFWS 2000).
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Comments: Alluvial sage scrub on alluvial fans, flood plains, along washes, in adjacent upland areas, and in areas with historic braided stream channels; these habitats characterized by sand, loam, sandy loam, or gravelly soils. Prefers the more open early and intermediate phases of alluvial sage scrub, but mature sage scrub is important as refugia during floods (McKernan 1993, 1997, USFWS 2000).
Trusted
Migration
Non-Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species do not make significant seasonal migrations. Juvenile dispersal is not considered a migration.
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).
Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.
Trusted
Population Biology
Number of Occurrences
Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.
Estimated Number of Occurrences: 6 - 20
Comments: Reported from more than 25 localities (Lidicker 1960, McKernan 1993); in 1997 known from seven major locations (McKernan 1997, cited in USFWS 2000; McKernan 1993; Steve Montgomery, SJM Biological Consultants, in litt., 1992; Rey-Vizgirdas 1994; Dudek and Associates 1994; Steve Myers, Tierra Madre Biological Consultants, in litt., 1994, USFWS 1998), of which four locations included the majority of the population (the others are small remnant populations). There are other occurrences of small, scattered populations in areas that are highly fragmented by urban and/or agricultural development (USFWS 2000).
Trusted
Global Abundance
Unknown
Comments: Total population size is unknown. The highest densities occur in the Santa Ana River Wash and Cajon Wash (McKernan 1996). Actual densities not known; female home ranges (which overlap only slightly) for this species in other regions range from 0.31 to 1.6 hectares (USFWS 2000). In 1997 occupied about 6576 hectares of habitat (USFWS 2000).
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
National NatureServe Conservation Status
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: N1 - Critically Imperiled
Trusted
NatureServe Conservation Status
Rounded Global Status Rank: T1 - Critically Imperiled
Reasons: Small, much reduced and fragmented range in southern California; only seven areas support the majority of the extant population; declining due to ongoing destruction, alteration and fragmentation of alluvial scrub habitat, resulting from human activities.
Trusted
Status: Endangered
Date Listed: 01/27/1998
Lead Region: California/Nevada Region (Region 8)
Where Listed:
Population detail:
Population location: entire
Listing status: E
For most current information and documents related to the conservation status and management of Dipodomys merriami parvus , see its USFWS Species Profile
Trusted
Trends
Global Short Term Trend: Decline of 10-30%
Comments: Has declined dramatically. Historic range has been reduced by about 96 percent; reduced from 25 historic locations to 7 currently occupied sites (USFWS 1998, USFWS 2000). Habitat loss and fragmentation is continuing (USFWS 2000).
Trusted
Threats
Degree of Threat: A : Very threatened throughout its range communities directly exploited or their composition and structure irreversibly threatened by man-made forces, including exotic species
Comments: Habitat has been and continues to be destroyed and fragmented by human activities (urbanization, agriculture, water projects, gravel mining) (USFWS 2000). Most of the suitable habitat remaining in the areas occupied by the largest populations is threatened by sand and gravel mining, flood control projects, excavation of borrow pits, urban development, and/or off-highway vehicle use; threats in some areas are imminent/ongoing (USFWS 1998). Seven Oaks Dam is expected to permanently alter the fluvial deposition regime of the Santa Ana River, allowing a change to unsuitable habitat conditions (more suitable for Dipodomys agilis) and eventually significantly reducing kangaroo rat populations in that area. Overall, 54 percent of the remaining flood plain habitat is proposed for development in the foreseeable future (USFWS 1998). Predation by feral cats has been recorded, but this is not known to be a significant threat.
Trusted
Management
Global Protection: Few (1-3) occurrences appropriately protected and managed
Comments: USFWS (2000) is proposing that critical habitat areas be designated, encompassing 22,423 hectares in total. About 567 hectares of alluvial scrub habitat is protected or in the process of being protected, but the vast majority of habitat is threatened. About 90% of habitat is privately owned; the rest is managed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, San Bernardino County Flood District, and the County of San Bernardino. A multi-species plan for rare species has been proposed for the San Bernardino Valley, but it has not been fully developed or implemented, and the protection that would be afforded the kangaroo rat is unknown. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has not claimed jurisdiction over enough habitat to afford a significant degree of protection along the Santa Ana River. A preserve at Etiwanda includes only 2 hectares of suitable habitat.
Trusted
Wikipedia
San Bernardino kangaroo rat
| This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (April 2010) |
The San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat,Dipodomys merriami parvus, is a species of rodent in the Heteromyidae family. It is one of 19 recognized subspecies of Merriam's Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami) that are spread throughout the arid regions of the southwestern United States and Mexico. Like D. merriami, the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat has the diagnostic trait of having four toes on its hind legs. Additionally, because of its geographic isolation, it has become the most highly differentiated subspecies of D. merriami.
Contents |
Physical description
The San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat follows the same body plan as Dipodomys merriami and other kangaroo rat species: large hind feet for jumping, long tail for balance while jumping, cheek pouches for foraging, and so on. Its body is about 95 millimeters (mm) (3.7 inches (in))long, with a total length of 230-235mm (9-9.3 in). Its body color is weakly yellow with a heavy overwash of dusky brown. The tail stripes are medium to dark brown, with dark brown tail hairs and foot pads. Its flanks and cheeks are dusky.
D. m. parvus is substantially darker and smaller than the other two D. merriami subspecies that live in Southern California (Dipodomys merriami merriami and Dipodomys merriami collinus). This marked adaptation to its habitat has lead Lidicker to say that "it seems likely to have achieved nearly species rank." (Lidicker 1960)
Habitat
In most heteromyids, soil texture is a primary factor in determining species distributions. (Brown and Harney, 1993) The range of D. m. parvus is isolated from members of D. m. merriami at the northernmost extent of their range by 8-13 kilometers (km) (5–8 miles (mi)) of unsuitable habitat, indicating possible past intergradation of the two subspecies.
San Bernardino Kangaroo Rats inhabit places with sandy loam substrates, characteristic of alluvial fans and flood plains, where they are able to dig small, simple burrows. Plantlife in such areas is typically dominated by chaparral and sage scrub. These alluvial scrub habitats can be classified as pioneer, intermediate, and mature, in order of decreased frequency of flooding and increased density of plants. Of these subsections of this particular habitat, D. m. parvus is most populous in intermediate alluvial scrub.
D. m. parvus is found unequally distributed between seven isolated locations. The four smallest remnant populations reside near City Creek, Etiwanda, Reche Canyon, and South Bloomington. The largest populations with the most area of suitable habitat are located near the Santa Ana River, Lytle and Cajon Creek, and the San Jacinto River.
The historical range of D. m. parvus encompassed roughly 128,000 hectares (ha) (320,000 acres (ac)); by the 1930s the its range had been reduced to roughly 11,200 ha (28,000 ac). As of 1998, its range is approximated at only 1,299 ha (3,247 ac).
Man-made threats
According to the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), D. m. parvus is threatened by "habitat destruction, degradation, and fragmentation by sand and gravel mining, flood control projects, urban development, vandalism, and inadequate regulatory mechanisms."
While sand and gravel mining and urban development have direct impact upon the habitat, flood control projects such as dams, levees, and berms indirectly change the habitat by preventing flooding. Curtailed flooding in these habitats will cause succession of the preferred 'intermediate' alluvial scrub habitat to 'mature' habitat, as removal and deposition of sand that would normally come with flooding has ceased. Furthermore, in areas with sufficient soil moisture, shrub densities will exceed the sparse to moderate densities where this subspecies lives. (Hanes et al. 1989, McKernan 1997)
Areas that are affected include the Santa Ana River, Lytle and Cajon Creek, and the San Jacinto River.
Urban development, in addition to directly destroying habitat, brings with it domesticated cats, a documented predator of the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat. The likelihood of predation increases as the interface between natural and urban habitats is increased.
Failed government regulation
The FWS notes several points of inadequate regulation at the time of publication (1998):
1) Lead agencies made choices detrimental to D. m. parvus under California Environmental Quality Act and National Environmental Policy Act,
2) California Environmental Quality Act rulings are subject to overriding social or economic decisions,
3) California's Natural Community Conservation Planning program, which is responsible for conserving alluvial scrub, is a voluntary program which San Bernardino and Riverside counties had not joined,
4) The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 requires that the parts of the D. m. parvus range used for mining undergo land rehabilitation; however, this will not likely have a beneficial effect on the species due to the changed topology and hydrology,
5) The Bureau of Land Management set aside three areas along the Santa Ana River for preservation of federally listed species such as D. m. parvus, the Santa Ana River Woolly Star (Eriastrum densifolium ssp. sanctorum), the Slender-Horned Spineflower, and the California Gnatcatcher. However, these areas are also allotted for potential water conservation projects such as percolation basins, and the areas allotted for the federally listed species seldom overlap with the range of D. m. parvus.
6) Finally, the Clean Water Act does not provide for conservation of threatened animals, and while projects executed under that act require a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, that agency has "allowed projects to proceed without their overview" within their jurisdiction.
Other threats
In addition to predation, the isolated ranges and small populations of D. m. parvus makes increased mortality rates more likely. Reduction in habitat size and species isolation leads to population loss "greater than expected from habitat loss alone," and this trend is well documented for rodents and other vertebrates. (Soule´ et al. 1992, Andren 1994, Bolger et al. 1997)
Isolated populations, being restricted to relatively small local areas, are more subject to extirpation from natural or manmade events, such as floods or drought. Due to their small population, they may also lose genetic variability and experience inbreeding depression. Isolation of groups is increased by the construction of railroad tracks, roads, and flood control channels.
Extirpation from flooding is becoming more likely as urban development pushes the remaining populations to the active flood plain. Due to the engineering of these allotted flood areas, the frequency and severity of flooding makes them uninhabitable. Likewise, in the areas where flooding has been diverted, the canopy density of the brush has increased beyond suitable levels for D. m. parvus.
References
Fish and Wildlife Service Emergency Rule to List the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat as
Endangered, "Federal Register, Vol. 63". http://www.fws.gov/policy/library/1998/98-2011.pdf. Retrieved 2010-04-08.
Trusted
Names and Taxonomy
Taxonomy
Comments: Regarded as a small, well-differentiated subspecies.
Trusted
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!



