Overview

Distribution

occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National Distribution

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Year-round

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: (20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)) This species is resident in southwestern California (north to Los Angeles County, formerly to Ventura County) and northwestern Baja California, south locally to southern Baja California (including Santa Margarita and Espiritu Santo islands) (AOU 1983), mostly at elevations below 500 meters. The species apparently no longer occurs in Ventura County (California), and its once extensive distribution in Los Angeles County is now reduced to a small portion of the Palos Verdes Peninsula.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Historic Range:
U.S.A. (CA), Mexico

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Size

Length: 11 cm

Weight: 6 grams

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Diagnostic Description

Differs from black-tailed gnatcatcher in being grayer below and having less white on the underside of the tail. Differs from the blue-gray gnatcatcher in having a less conspicuous eye ring and and dull gray rather than more whitish underparts. See Dunn and Garrett (1987) for detailed treatment of field identification of this and other North American gnatcatchers.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Systems
  • Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat Type: Terrestrial

Comments: Habitats include coastal sagebrush and thorn forest, desert brush, and scrub, especially in mesquite and creosote-bush (AOU 1989), on dry coastal slopes, along washes, and on mesas; areas of low plant growth (about 1 meter high). In California, this gnatcatcher occurs in several distinctive subassociations of the coastal sage scrub plant community, especially those dominated by Artemisia californica (Atwood 1992). Generally it avoids crossing even small areas of unsuitable habitat (Atwood 1992). Nests are in shrubs.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Migration

Non-Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species do not make significant seasonal migrations. Juvenile dispersal is not considered a migration.

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Trophic Strategy

Comments: Gleans insects and spiders from foliage and twigs.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population Biology

Number of Occurrences

Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.

Estimated Number of Occurrences: 21 to >300

Comments: Occurrences have not been circumscribed using standardized criteria, but this species certainly is represented by a large number of occurrences (subpopulations), or at least by a substantial number of relatively large occurrences.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Abundance

10,000 - 1,000,000 individuals

Comments: Population in the United States is likely around 3,000 pairs (Atwood and Bontrager 2001). Abundance in Baja California is undetermined, but Atwood (1993) stated that most of the species' population is in central and southern Baja California and that the species is "common" there, and Zink et al. (2000) characterized Baja populations as "dense and continuously distributed throughout the peninsula." Thus the breeding population in Baja California is likely to be much larger than 3,000 pairs.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

Home range may be as small as 0.8 hectares in high quality habitat, as large as 5.6 hectares in inland areas with relatively sparse vegetation (Atwood 1992). Territories generally 1.6 to 4.4 hectares (Atwood 1993).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Life Expectancy

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

Maximum longevity: 8 years (wild)
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Joao Pedro de Magalhaes

Source: AnAge

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

California: breeds from late February through mid-July, with most initial nesting attempts from mid-March through early April; clutch size averages 3.8; incubation by both sexes, about 14 days; nestling period about 16 days; reproductive success often poor due to predation or parasitism by brown-headed cowbird (Atwood 1992).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Barcode data: Polioptila californica

The following is a representative barcode sequence, the centroid of all available sequences for this species. 

 
There are 2 barcode sequences available from BOLD and GenBank.  Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species.  See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.
 
CDAMH086-05|AMNH-DOT4932|Polioptila californica| ---------------------------------------------------------------------GGAATGGTAGGAACTGCCCTA---AGCCTCCTCATCCGAGCAGAACTAGGTCAACCAGGGGCTCTCCTAGGAGAT---GACCAAGTCTACAATGTAATCGTCACAGCCCATGCCTTCGTAATAATTTTCTTCATAGTCATACCAATTATAATCGGCGGATTCGGAAACTGACTAGTCCCCCTAATA---ATTGGAGCCCCCGATATAGCATTCCCCCGAATAAACAACATAAGCTTCTGACTACTCCCTCCCTCATTCCTTCTACTCCTAGCCTCATCCACCGTTGAAGCAGGAGTAGGAACTGGCTGAACAGTGTACCCACCCCTAGCCGGTAACCTCGCCCACGCTGGAGCCTCAGTAGACCTG---GCCATCTTCTCCCTACACCTAGCCGGTATCTCCTCAATTCTTGGAGCAATCAACTTTATTACAACAGCAATCAACATAAAACCCCCTGCCCTATCCCAATACCAAACCCCCCTATTCGTATGATCAGTACTAATTACCGCAGTCCTACTACTACTTTCTCTCCCCGTACTTGCTGCA---GGCATCACCATGCTTCTAACAGACCGTAACCTAAACACCACCTTCTTTGACCCTGCGGGAGGA---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
-- end --

Download FASTA File
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Polioptila californica

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 2
Species: 6
Species With Barcodes: 1

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2009

Assessor/s
BirdLife International

Reviewer/s
Bird, J., Butchart, S.

Contributor/s

Justification
This species has a very large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size is very large, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.

History
  • 2008
    Least Concern
  • 2004
    Least Concern
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National NatureServe Conservation Status

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N2 - Imperiled

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G4 - Apparently Secure

Reasons: Has declined in range and abundance at the northern end of the range in southern California, due mainly to loss and fragmentation of habitat by urban/residential development; in Baja California, where the vast majority of the global population occurs, the species is common and not significantly threatened.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Current Listing Status Summary

Status: Threatened
Date Listed: 03/30/1993
Lead Region:   California/Nevada Region (Region 8) 
Where Listed:


Population detail:

Population location: entire
Listing status: T

For most current information and documents related to the conservation status and management of Polioptila californica, see its USFWS Species Profile

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Short Term Trend: Relatively stable to decline of 30%

Global Long Term Trend: Increase of 10-25% to decline of 50%

Comments: Substantial habitat has been eliminated in southern California, whereas relatively little habitat has been lost in Baja California, except in the north. The most optimistic assessment of habitat loss is southern California concluded that current coastal sage scrub habitat (as of the early 1990s) was 66 percent of the historical level (Michael Brandman Associates 1991, cited by Atwood and Bontrager 2001). In contrast, Westman (1981) stated that coastal sage scrub in southern California had been reduced to 10-15 percent of its former extent by the early 1980s. Atwood and Bontrager (2001) interpreted avilable information as indicating that about 70-90 percent of the original habitat in southern California had been eliminated. Atwood and Bontrager (2001) cited an unpublished 1993 USFWS report stating that habitat loss in southern California was 33 percent since 1993. Because most of the gnatcatcher's habitat is in Baja California, the range-wide long-term trend is at worst a moderate decline.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Degree of Threat: A : Very threatened throughout its range communities directly exploited or their composition and structure irreversibly threatened by man-made forces, including exotic species

Comments: Remaining populations in southern California are highly fragmented by urban development, which has destroyed much coastal sage scrub habitat. Intense housing development and construction or expansion of transportation corridors in Orange, Riverside, and San Diego counties, California, threaten remaining large tracts of habitat (Atwood 1992, Small 1994). However, "given the scope of conservation measures currently being undertaken in coastal southern California, prognosis for the species' continued persistence is good" (Atwood and Bontrager 2001).


With increased habitat fragmentation, parasitism by the brown-headed cowbirds has become a threat (Atwood 1992).

Wildfires periodically eliminate (temporarily) significant areas of gnatcatcher habitat (Small 1994).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Biological Research Needs: See Atwood and Bontrager (2001).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Protection: Few (1-3) occurrences appropriately protected and managed

Comments: USFWS (2007) designated as critical habitat approximately 79,846 hectares of habitat in San Diego, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, and Ventura counties, California. Small populations are found in some publicly owned preserves (Willick and Patten 1992) and certain military bases (e.g., Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base) (Steinitz et al. 1996). This species is an element in a large number of habitat conservation plans.

Needs: Protection of intact habitat of sufficient size to support viable populations is urgently needed, but this is difficult and expensive because of the high human demand for land in coastal southern California.

Mechanical and manual removal of invasive exotic plants is an important aspect of habitat restoration in some cases (Atwood and Bontrager 2001).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

California Gnatcatcher

The California Gnatcatcher, Polioptila californica, is a small 10.8 cm (4.25 inches) long insectivorous bird which frequents dense coastal sage scrub growth. This species was recently split from the similar Black-tailed Gnatcatcher of the Sonoran and Chihuahuan deserts. This bird is often solitary, but joins with other birds in winter flocks.

Contents

Appearance

The male California Gnatcatcher is dusky gray overall, distinguished only by its black crown and thin black beak. It has a long, thin black tail with narrow white tips and edges on the underside of the tail feathers. However, the male loses its plumage colors by winter, and obtains a plumage color like the females. The female is similar to the male, but with a blue-gray instead of a black crown.

In its range from coastal Southern California south through Baja California and Baja California Sur, this inconspicuous non-migratory resident is most often seen flitting hastily into undergrowth, or heard giving its call, which sounds like a kitten's mew (a rising and falling zeeeeer, zeeeeer).

Diet

The California Gnatcatcher's diet consists of small insects and spiders.

Habitat

In the northern part of its range (Southern California) this species, Polioptila californica, was listed as Threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in 1993 due to increasing development in its habitat, coastal sage scrub (current loss of coastal sage scrub in U.S is estimated at 70 to 90 percent (Atwood 1991, [1])). Critical Habitat designation under the Endangered Species Act is on hold pending court-ordered review. This species is especially vulnerable as a metapopulation due to its small populations in a limited habitat often live in the prime land to be developed for housing and commerce that can be easily isolated and reduced in size.

Though some of its habitat has been saved in national forests and state parks, its population has been severely fragmented. There are, however, ongoing efforts to preserve more open land in Southern California to help ensure that this species will not disappear from its former range. California Gnatcatchers are a focal species in many regional habitat conservation planning efforts.

Ecology and reproduction

Monogamous pairs care for their brood of 3-5 eggs in cone-shaped nests; Brown-headed cowbirds are parasites on their nests, laying eggs in their nests.[2]

See also

References

  • Atwood, J.L., and D.R. Bontrager. 2001. California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica). In The Birds of North America, No. 574 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA.
  • Mock, P. 2004. California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica). In The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan: a strategy for protecting and managing coastal scrub and chaparral habitats and associated birds in California. California Partners in Flight. http://www.prbo.org/calpif/htmldocs/scrub/californa_gnatcatcher.html
  • Mock, P.J. 2004. California Gnatcatcher. Pages 430-433 In P. Unitt. San Diego County Bird Atlas. San Diego Natural History Museum No. 39. Ibis Publishing Co. Vista, CA.
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: This species formerly was included in P. melanura (AOU 1989, Atwood 1988, 1991). Although morphological studies have led to the recognition of various subspecies (e.g., Atwood 1991, Mellink and Rea 1994), these have been controversial. Moreover, range-wide genetic analyses (Zink et al. 2000) indicate that northern populations of P. californica are not differentiated from southern populations and that the pattern of genetic variation is inconsistent with the recognition of proposed subspecies.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!