Overview

Distribution

Range Description

Fulica alai is endemic to the Hawaiian Islands (USA), where it is found on all the main islands except Kaho`olawe14. Formerly, it was also absent from Lâna`i, which, along with Kaho`olawe, lacked suitable wetland habitat14. Stragglers reach as far west as Kure in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. It declined dramatically during the 20th century2, although it increased on O`ahu from the mid-1970s to the late 1980s. During this period, highly variable numbers on other islands showed no local trends12. Survey data from 1976 to 2003 reveal short-term population fluctuations, with a long-term slight increase in the overall population14. The current population probably fluctuates between 2,000 and 4,000 individuals, with Kaua`i, O`ahu and Maui supporting 80% of this total5,10,14. Some 30 colonies or concentrations are known1,6.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

endemic to a single state or province

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National Distribution

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Year-round

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: (250-20,000 square km (about 100-8000 square miles)) Hawaiian Islands; reported from all main islands except Lanai and Kahoolawe; most numerous on Oahu, Maui, and Kauai; generally at elevations below 200 m; occasionally individuals wander to the northwestern Hawaiian Islands.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Historic Range:
U.S.A. (HI)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Size

Length: 39 cm

Weight: 724 grams

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Diagnostic Description

Differs from the American coot of mainland North America in being smaller and darker, and by having a more slender bill and larger bulbous frontal shield that is white to pale blue or blood red (vs. typically smaller and maroon or dark brown); also, a hump is visible on the forehead in profile (absent in winter American coots) (Berger 1981, Pratt 1987). A small percentage have a red shield and black bill marking similar to North American race.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
It can be expected on virtually any body of water, including estuaries, marshes and golf course wetlands12. It is typically a species of the coastal plain, usually found below 400 m, however some birds inhabit upland pools above 1,500 m on Kaua`i and montane stock ponds up to 2,000 m on Hawai`i14. Breeding sites are characterised by robust emergent plants interspersed with open, fresh or brackish water, which is usually less than one metre deep. To some extent it is nomadic and irruptive, wandering between islands in response to the availability of water-bodies11. It may nest in any month of the year14.

Systems
  • Terrestrial
  • Freshwater
  • Marine
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Various freshwater and brackish wetlands, including lakes, ponds, reservoirs, irrigation ditches, and marshes where vegetation is interspersed with open shallows. Uses ephemeral wetlands in wet years. Most suitable wetlands are near coast below 200 m elevation. May build false nests and use these for loafing or brooding platforms (Matthews and Moseley 1990). Nest is anchored to clumps of emergent vegetation or occasionally free-floating. Nests where water level is stable (Matthews and Moseley 1990).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Migration

Non-Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species do not make significant seasonal migrations. Juvenile dispersal is not considered a migration.

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Trophic Strategy

Comments: Eats seeds and leaves of aquatic plants, snails, crustaceans, small fishes, tadpoles, and insects; dives for food or forages in mud and sand; prefers to feed near nesting area but may fly long distances when food is locally scarce (Matthews and Moseley 1990).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population Biology

Number of Occurrences

Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.

Estimated Number of Occurrences: 21 - 80

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Abundance

1000 - 2500 individuals

Comments: From 1976 to 1983, numbers ranged from 400 to 2,300 birds with an average of 1,300 (USFWS 1985). In the 1980s, the statewide population probably fluctuated between 2000 and 4000 birds, with 80% of the birds on Kauai, Oahu, and Maui (Engilis and Pratt 1993, Scott et al. 1988).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

Adults are aggressively territorial. Pristine habitat may support up to 24 individuals/ha in nonbreeding season (Matthews and Moseley 1990). Congregates during the summer nonbreeding period. Populations fluctuate with climatic variations (drought periods reduce the amount of suitable habitat) (Engilis and Pratt 1993).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Reproduction

Nests year round, but mostly March-September, apparently triggered by local habitat conditions (e.g., water level); clutch size averages 4-6; incubation lasts 23-27 days; young leave nest soon after hatching (Matthews and Moseley 1990).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Barcode data: Fulica alai

The following is a representative barcode sequence, the centroid of all available sequences for this species. 

 
There are 2 barcode sequences available from BOLD and GenBank.  Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species.  See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.
 
SIBHI093-11|USNM 643402|Fulica alai| ------------------------------------------CTCTACTTAATTTTCGGAGCCTGAGCCGGCATAATCGGCACCGCCCTC---AGCCTGCTTATTCGAGCAGAATTAGGACAACCAGGCACCCTCCTAGGAGAC---GACCAAATTTACAATGTAATCGTCACCGCCCACGCCTTTGTAATAATTTTCTTTATAGTAATACCAATCATAATCGGAGGTTTCGGCAACTGACTAGTACCTCTCATA---ATCGGAGCCCCAGACATAGCATTTCCCCGCATAAATAACATAAGCTTCTGACTCCTCCCCCCCTCCTTCCTACTACTCCTAGCATCATCCACAGTAGAAGCAGGAGCAGGCACAGGATGAACAGTTTACCCCCCACTAGCCGGCAACCTAGCACATGCAGGCGCTTCAGTTGACCTA---GCCATCTTCTCCCTCCACTTAGCGGGCGTCTCATCTATCCTAGGCGCCATCAATTTTATTACAACTGCCATCAACATAAAACCACCCGCCCTATCCCAATACCAAACTCCCCTATTCGTATGATCCGTCCTTATCACCGCTGTTCTACTATTACTGTCCCTCCCTGTCCTTGCCGCC---GGCATTACTATACTACTAACCGACCGAAACCTAAATACCACATTCTTCGACCCAGCTGGAGGAGGCGACCCTATCCTATACCAACATCTCTTCTGATTTTTCGGACACCCAGAAGTCTATATCCTAATTCTC------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
-- end --

Download FASTA File
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Fulica alai

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 2
Species: 2
Species With Barcodes: 1

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
VU
Vulnerable

Red List Criteria
D2

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2008

Assessor/s
BirdLife International

Reviewer/s
Taylor, J., Butchart, S.

Contributor/s
Baker, P., Baker, H., Lepson, J., Morin, M., Pimm, S., Reed, M., Fretz, S., VanderWerf, E., Donaldson, P., Camp, R.

Justification
Although able to take advantage of most waterbodies, this species is listed as Vulnerable because its range is very small and susceptible to stochastic events and human activities, given that its wetland habitat is scattered and limited in area, and that only a small number of concentrations are known.

History
  • 2007
    Vulnerable
  • 2006
    Vulnerable
  • 2004
    Vulnerable
  • 2000
    Vulnerable
  • 1996
    Vulnerable
  • 1994
    Vulnerable
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National NatureServe Conservation Status

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N2 - Imperiled

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G2 - Imperiled

Reasons: Small range on several of the Hawaiian Islands; population is low (a few thousand) and variable; habitat has been much reduced, and threats of further loss due to development are increasing.

Other Considerations: Listed as endangered by the USFWS and the Hawaii State Department of Land and Natural Resources. Current reproduction rates are adequate to maintain species' numbers. Coots can coexist with and possibly benefit from some human activity such as man-made wetlands (e.g., taro fields and golf course ponds).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Current Listing Status Summary

Status: Endangered
Date Listed: 10/13/1970
Lead Region:   Pacific Region (Region 1) 
Where Listed:


Population detail:

Population location: entire
Listing status: E

For most current information and documents related to the conservation status and management of Fulica alai, see its USFWS Species Profile

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
The current population is thought to fluctuate between 2,000 and 4,000 birds (Pratt 1987; Engilis and Pratt 1993).

Population Trend
Unknown
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Short Term Trend: Relatively stable (=10% change)

Comments: USFWS (1990) categorized the status as "stable." Establishment of wildlife refuges (e.g., in Hanalei Valley, Kauai, along Huleia River, Kauai; Kakahaia, Molokai; Pearl Harbor, Oahu, and James Campbell National Wildlife Refuge, Oahu) has enabled the population to attain some degree of stabilization, though numbers fluctuate.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Threats

Major Threats
Throughout its range, wetlands have been destroyed by drainage for cultivation and developments2,4,9 such as hotels, housing areas, golf courses, shopping centres, landfill sites, military installations, roads and industrial sites14. Some water-bodies have become overgrown by introduced plants1,8. On O`ahu, artificial wetlands associated with sugarcane plantations have disappeared as these industries have declined on the island4. However, this has had no detectable effect on the population, based on survey data12. Introduced predators are an additional threat1,5. These include the black rat Rattus rattus, brown rat Rattus norwegicus, domestic cat and dog, small Asian mongoose Herpestes javanicus and Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis12. H. javanicus is known to take the eggs, young birds and nesting adults of wetland bird species14. Predation appears to be a serious problem on golf courses, where F. alai is abundant12. The species may be poisoned by insecticides and herbicides used to treat water channels on agricultural land and golf courses2,4, although research is required to confirm this potential threat and its severity. Outbreaks of avian botulism have caused high mortality in several areas1,7,8,13.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Degree of Threat: A : Very threatened throughout its range communities directly exploited or their composition and structure irreversibly threatened by man-made forces, including exotic species

Comments: Decline has been due to loss of both natural and cultivated wetlands such as taro fields; this habitat loss has resulted from commercial and residential development, sugarcane cultivation, and encroachment of non-native wetland plants. Predation by introduced mammals (mongoose, rats, cats, dogs) may have contributed to the decline. A large portion of the population is not breeding (Scott et al. 1988). Habitat loss/degradation due to coastal development is an ongoing concern.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
Conservation Actions Underway
Hunting was prohibited in 1939, and the species has been fully protected by US law since 197012. Several key wetland areas have been, or are being, acquired as refuges or sanctuaries, and other areas are protected by cooperative agreements. Predator control has been effective in increasing the productivity of many wetland species at Kanaha pond, Maui1.

Conservation Actions Proposed
Study breeding seasonality and local movements3. Determine the relative importance of threats12. Investigate whether herbicides and insecticides used on golf courses pose a serious threat to the species. Manage habitats, e.g. prevent ponds from drying out, or becoming overgrown by alien plants and create nesting islands inaccessible to introduced predators1,3,5,8. Carry out predator control12. Increase the area of protected wetlands12. Where botulism is a problem, remove carcasses, manage water-levels and quality, treat sick birds and discourage or move healthy birds from affected areas7.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Biological Research Needs: Further investigation into optimal and subobtimal habitat needed, along with more studies on the effects of introduced predators and water pollution.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Protection: Few to several (1-12) occurrences appropriately protected and managed

Comments: Eight sites, including nesting areas, are protected in federal national wildlife refuges; 2 sites are in state sanctuaries.

Needs: Make additions to James Campbell NWR; include Kealia wetlands on Maui in the National Wildlife Refuge system; manage Kawainui Marsh on Oahu for waterbirds; create wetland habitat at Mana on Kauai (USFWS 1990). Engilis and Pratt (1993) stated that populations could be increased with an increase in properly managed wetlands and control of mammalian predators.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Hawaiian Coot

The Hawaiian Coot or ʻalae keʻokeʻo (Fulica alai) is a species of bird in the rail family, Rallidae, that is endemic to Hawaiʻi.[2] It is similar to the American coot at 33–40.6 cm (13–16.0 in) in length and weighing around 700 g (1.5 lb). Its natural habitats are freshwater lakes, freshwater marshes, coastal saline lagoons, and water storage areas. The bird is was federally listed in October 1970 as an endangered species [3] and is considered both endemic and endangered by the state of Hawaii. It is threatened by habitat loss and introduced predators such as the small Asian mongoose.[1] The Makalawena Marsh on the Big Island of Hawaiʻi has been listed as a National Natural Landmark to preserve one of its last nesting areas.[4]

Contents

Endangered Species Listing

The Hawaiian coot was federally listed in October 1970 as an endangered species [5] and is considered both endemic and endangered by the state of Hawaii [6]. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service's 5-year review, conducted in 2010, found that none of the four criteria established for delisting or downlisting of the species had been meet [7]. The delisting/downlisting criteria include protection and management of core and supporting wetlands, a population size greater than 2000 birds for five consecutive years, and multiple self sustaining populations throughout the Hawaiian Islands.

Taxonomy

The first reference to a coot in the Hawaiian Islands was by Andrew Bloxam, who saw it, although he did not collect a specimen, while in the islands in 1825 as the naturalist on board HMS Blonde. He mistook it for the Eurasian Coot, Fulica atra. It is now considered either to be a separate species, Fulica alai, or a subspecies of the American Coot, Fulica americana alai.[8]

Population size

On Oahu, Maui, Molokai and Kaua’i, the Hawaiian coot was previously abundant in coastal brackish and fresh-water ponds, streams, and marshes [9]; however, the first censuses conducted in the 1950s and 1960s detected fewer than 1,000 birds statewide [10]. Since the 1960s, the interannual population size has fluctuated from less than 1,000 birds to over 3,000, and appears to be gradually increasing. Biannual surveys conducted by the Hawaiian Department of Land and Natural Resource’s Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) found that between 1998 and 2003 the inter-island coot population averaged 2,100 birds, ranging between 1,500 and 3,000 birds [11]. Recent surveys estimated winter populations fluctuating around 1,500 birds and a summer population fluctuating around 2,000 birds [12].

Gallery

References

  1. ^ a b BirdLife International (2008). "Fulica alai". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2. International Union for Conservation of Nature. http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/143927. Retrieved 31 January 2010. 
  2. ^ "ʻAlae keʻokeʻo or Hawaiian Coot". Hawaii’s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy. State of Hawaiʻi. 2005-10-01. http://www.state.hi.us/dlnr/dofaw/cwcs/files/NAAT%20final%20CWCS/Chapters/Terrestrial%20Fact%20Sheets/Waterbirds/hawaiian%20coot%20NAAT%20final2%20!.pdf. 
  3. ^ United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1970. Conservation of Endangered Species and other Fish or Wildlife: United States List of Endangered Native Fish and Wildlife. Federal Registry 35: 16047-16048.
  4. ^ Makalawena Marsh on National Park Service web site
  5. ^ United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1970. Conservation of Endangered Species and other Fish or Wildlife: United States List of Endangered Native Fish and Wildlife Federal Registry 35: 16047-16048.
  6. ^ Mitchell, C., C. Ogura, D.W. Meadows, A. Kane, L. Strommer, S. Fretz, D. Leonard, and A. McClung. 2005. Hawaii’s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy. Department of Land and Natural Resources. Honolulu, Hawai‘i.
  7. ^ United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. Hawaiian Coot or ‘alae ke’oke’o (Fulica alai) 5-Year Review Summary and Evaluation. USFWS Pacific Island Fish and Wildlife Office, Honolulu, HI, 11 pp.
  8. ^ Olson, Storrs L. (1996), "The contribution of the voyage of H.M.S. Blonde to Hawaiin ornithology", Archives of Natural History 23 (1): 1–42, http://si-pddr.si.edu/dspace/bitstream/10088/8385/1/VZ_269_Blonde_in_Hawaii.pdf 
  9. ^ Schwartz, C.W. and E.R. Schwartz. 1952. The Hawaiian Coot. The Auk 69: 446-449.
  10. ^ United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds, Second Draft of Second Revision, Portland, Oregon, 155 pp. Available online at <http://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/recovery-plans.html>
  11. ^ United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds, Second Draft of Second Revision, Portland, Oregon, 155 pp. Available online at <http://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/recovery-plans.html>.
  12. ^ United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. Hawaiian Coot or ‘alae ke’oke’o (Fulica alai) 5-Year Review Summary and Evaluation. USFWS Pacific Island Fish and Wildlife Office, Honolulu, HI, 11 pp.
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: Formerly included as a subspecies of F. americana. Regarded as a distinct species by AOU (1993), following Pratt (1987) and Pratt et al. (1987).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!