Overview

Distribution

Range Description

This species is endemic to southern and south-western Australia. It was formerly much more widespread. It is currently known from a number of islands: three islands in the Houtman Abrolhos (West Wallabi, East Wallabi, and North, the last being introduced from one of the Wallabi islands and causing vegetation degradation and erosion), Garden Island (near Perth), Middle and North Twin Peak Islands (Archipelago of the Recherche), and Kangaroo Island. Natural subpopulations remain on the mainland at Tutanning, Boyagin, and Perup Nature Reserves, in Fitzgerald River National Park. It has been translocated to several sites, the majority being successful. These include Batalling, Julimar, and Warup Forests, Nambung National Park, and Avon Valley National Park and the adjacent Paruna Sanctuary. Populations have also been introduced to Greenly (c. 1905) and Boston (1971) Islands from Kangaroo Island. Feral populations of this species exist in New Zealand, including Kauwau Island.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Geographic Range

Tammar wallabies are found in Australia, New Zealand, and various islands off the western and southern coast of Australia. (Grzimek, 1990; Nowak, 1991)

Biogeographic Regions: australian (Native )

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Morphology

Physical Description

Significant sexual dimorphism exists between the males and the females of this species, with males growing to be larger. The maximum recorded weight in males is 9.1 kg, while in females it is 6.9 kg. The body length is 59 to 68 cm in males and 52 to 63 cm in females. Both males and females are about 45 cm in height. The tails of males range from 38 to 45 cm and that of females from 33 to 44 cm.

Males have considerably larger forelimbs and wider claws than the females. Macropus eugenii is the smallest species of wallaby. It has a small head and large ears; the tail is long and thick at the base. The hind legs are larger than the forelimbs and specialized for leaping. This species has a gray to yellow belly and red legs. Like all marsupials, the female of this species has a pouch in the skin of the abdomen in which she nurses her young.

Range mass: 4 to 9.1 kg.

Range length: 52 to 68 cm.

Sexual Dimorphism: male larger

Average basal metabolic rate: 7.78 W.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
This species is found in coastal scrub, heath, dry sclerophyll forest, and mallee woodlands (Hinds 2008). It requires open grassy areas for feeding and low dense vegetation for daytime shelter (Hinds 2008).

Systems
  • Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat

These wallabies live in areas of dense vegetation with low trees and bushes, in thickets and around the outskirts of forests.

Terrestrial Biomes: desert or dune ; savanna or grassland ; scrub forest

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Trophic Strategy

Food Habits

Macropus eugenii is an herbivore that specializes on grass. Members of the family Macropodidae have the characteristic ability to move the lower jaw forward and backward, maximizing the shredding effect.

To obtain food, M. eugenii grazes, moving on all four limbs.

Primary Diet: herbivore (Folivore )

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Life Expectancy

Lifespan/Longevity

Average lifespan

Status: captivity:
9.8 years.

Average lifespan

Status: wild:
14.0 years.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

Maximum longevity: 15.1 years (captivity) Observations: In the wild these animals live up to 14 years (Bernhard Grzimek 1990). One specimen lived 15 years in captivity (Richard Weigl 2005).
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Joao Pedro de Magalhaes

Source: AnAge

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

Reproduction

The gestation period of Macropus eugenii lasts 25 to 28 days. Young are born at a rudimentary stage of development. After birth, the joey remains in the pouch for 8 to 9 months until it is physically fully developed. Weaning occurs at about 10 to 11 months. Macropus eugenii has only one offspring per birth; the newborn weighs less than 1 gram. The young reaches sexual maturity at 9 months if it is a female, and 2 years if its a male.

The members of this family have a unique reproductive pattern called embryonic diapause. This phenomenon is also known as "delayed birth" because embryonic development is temporarily posponed until the proper conditions are available. A female that is nursing a joey in her pouch may also have a dormant embryo in its uterus. Then, when the joey stops nursing, the embryo resume its development.

Uterine gestation is very brief, and much of the development of the embryo takes place in the pouch outside of the uterus. The pouch contains the nipples.

The birthing process of Macropus eugenii starts with the newborn leaving the cloaca and freeing itself from the fetal membranes. Instinctively, led by sense of smell and gravity, it makes its way to the pouch. Once in the pouch, the newborn attaches its mouth to a single teat, from which the newborn gets milk high in fat and nutrients.

Male M. eugenii have a long duration of spermatogenesis and a long period of sperm transit in comparison with other mammals. These characteristics lend this species to studies of sperm production.

Average number of offspring: 1.

Range gestation period: 25 to 28 days.

Range weaning age: 10 to 11 months.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female): 9 months.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male): 2 years.

Key Reproductive Features: iteroparous ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); fertilization ; viviparous ; embryonic diapause

Average birth mass: 0.429 g.

Average number of offspring: 1.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male)

Sex: male:
730 days.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)

Sex: female:
274 days.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Evolution and Systematics

Functional Adaptations

Functional adaptation

Tendons store energy: tammar wallaby
 

The tendons of tammar wallaby legs use energy efficiently by taking advantage of elastic energy storage.

     
  "Moderate to large macropodids can increase their speed while hopping with little or no increase in energy expenditure. This has been interpreted by some workers as resulting from elastic energy savings in their hindlimb tendons. For this to occur, the muscle fibers must transmit force to their tendons with little or no length change. To test whether this is the case, we made in vivo measurements of muscle fiber length change and tendon force in the lateral gastrocnemius (LG) and plantaris (PL) muscles of tammar wallabies Macropus eugenii as they hopped at different speeds on a treadmill. Muscle fiber length changes were less than +/-0.5 mm in the plantaris and +/-2.2 mm in the lateral gastrocnemius, representing less than 2 % of total fiber length in the plantaris and less than 6 % in the lateral gastrocnemius, with respect to resting length. The length changes of the plantaris fibers suggest that this occurred by means of elastic extension of attached cross-bridges. Much of the length change in the lateral gastrocnemius fibers occurred at low force early in the stance phase, with generally isometric behavior at higher forces. Fiber length changes did not vary significantly with increased hopping speed in either muscle (P>0.05), despite a 1. 6-fold increase in muscle-tendon force between speeds of 2.5 and 6.0 m s-1. Length changes of the PL fibers were only 7+/-4 % and of the LG fibers 34+/-12 % (mean +/- S.D., N=170) of the stretch calculated for their tendons, resulting in little net work by either muscle (plantaris 0.01+/-0.03 J; gastrocnemius -0.04+/-0.30 J; mean +/- s.d. ). In contrast, elastic strain energy stored in the tendons increased with increasing speed and averaged 20-fold greater than the shortening work performed by the two muscles. These results show that an increasing amount of strain energy stored within the hindlimb tendons is usefully recovered at faster steady hopping speeds, without being dissipated by increased stretch of the muscles' fibers. This finding supports the view that tendon elastic saving of energy is an important mechanism by which this species is able to hop at faster speeds with little or no increase in metabolic energy expenditure." (Biewener 1998:1681)
  Learn more about this functional adaptation.
  • Alexander, RM. 1984. Elastic energy stores in running vertebrates. American Zoologist. 24(1): 85-94.
  • Biewener, AA; Baudinette, RV. 1995. In vivo muscle energy storage during steady-speed hopping of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii). Journal of Experimental Biology. 198: 1829-1841.
  • Biewener, AA; Konieczynski, DD; Baudinette, RV. 1998. In vivo muscle force-length behavior during steady speed hopping in tammar wallabies. Journal of Experimental Biology. 201: 1681-1694.
  • Baudinette, RV; Biewener, AA. 1998. Young wallabies get a free ride. Nature. 395: 653-654.
  • Dawson, TJ; Taylor, CR. 1973. Energetic cost of locomotion in kangaroos. Nature. 246: 313-314.
  • Pabst, DA. 1996. Springs in swimming animals. American Zoologist. 36: 723-735.
  • Lehmann JF; Price R; Boswell-Bessette S; Dralle A; Questad K; De Lateur BJ. 1993. Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex foot and Seattle foot versus standard SACH foot. 74: 1225-1231.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© The Biomimicry Institute

Source: AskNature

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Functional adaptation

Milk protects against microbes: tammar wallaby
 

The milk of the tammar wallaby protects newborn wallabies from bacteria and fungi via the antimicrobial AGG01 molecule.

     
  "A newborn wallaby is a tiny, bean-shaped creature, barely more than a fetus. It lacks a developed immune system, relying on compounds in its mother's milk to protect it against pathogens. Now a unique antimicrobial has been discovered in wallaby milk that could be used in hospitals to fight deadly antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

"When born, with a heart but no lungs, tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) crawl into their mother's pouch, where they latch on to milk-bearing teats. 'A huge amount of development happens in the pouch and during that time they just rely on milk,' says Ben Cocks of the Victoria Department of Primary Industries in Melbourne, Australia.

"Cocks has found that the mother's milk contains a molecule that is 100 times more effective against Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli than the most potent form of penicillin. The molecule, called AGG01, also kills four types of Gram-positive bacteria and one type of fungus. The work was presented at the US Biotechnology Industry Organization 2006 meeting in Chicago [April 2006].

"AGG01 was probably lost from placental mammals, whose young have their own immune systems, when they split from marsupials." (New Scientist 2006:16)
  Learn more about this functional adaptation.
  • New Scientist. 2006. Fighting superbugs with milk. New Scientist [Internet], Accessed 4/20/2006.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© The Biomimicry Institute

Source: AskNature

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2008

Assessor/s
Morris, K., Friend, T., Burbidge, A. & van Weenen, J.

Reviewer/s
Lamoreux, J. & Hilton-Taylor, C. (Global Mammal Assessment Team)

Justification
Listed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution, presumed large population, occurrence in a number of protected areas, and because it is unlikely to be declining at nearly the rate required to qualify for listing in a threatened category.

History
  • 1996
    Lower Risk/near threatened
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation Status

Humans have introduced tammar wallabies to islands previously uninhabited by this species. They have also played a part in the alteration of the habitat of M. eugenii. Domestic livestock have reduced the natural grassland vegetation, rendering it inappropriate for occupation by tammars.

Tamar wallabies continue to be shot for commercial purposes or pest control. The use and demand of kangaroo skins for leather products is high, although this species is not singled out for this purpose.

The habitat of M. eugenii may also be threatened by the introduction of new species. Rabbits were first introduced to Australia by European settlers and wreaked havoc ever since. Rabbit populations often reach astounding densities and their consumption of vegetation causes massive destruction to the grasslands. Since their first introduction, rabbits have posed a threat to native fauna, including kangaroos and wallabies.

With increased awareness and publicity, these animals should be protected to a greater degree.

US Federal List: no special status

CITES: no special status

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: least concern

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
Historically it was locally very abundant, but it is now much rarer. It is considered common within its limited habitat by Hinds (2008). In south-western Australia ongoing fox control programs and reintroductions have helped the species increase in number recently. It is still abundant on Kangaroo Island (Hinds 2008).

Population Trend
Unknown
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Threats

Major Threats
This species declined due to a combination of land clearing, impacts of settlers' fires, predation by introduced predators (especially cats and foxes), and hunting by early settlers.

There are no current major threats to Macropus eugenii. Predation by foxes is a threat in parts of its range, and fox control is thought essential for survival on the mainland (A. Burbidge pers. comm.). Inappropriate fire regimes may also be a threat in places. On Kangaroo Island, it is considered to be an agricultural pest.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
This species is known from a number of protected areas. Continued reintroduction programs and fox control programs are important to the conservation of this species. Also important to the species is maintaining an appropriate fire regime within its habitat.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems

Benefits

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

Kangaroos and wallabies damage cereal crops, eat livestock food, drink stock water and destroy fences. The magnitude of their role as agricultural pests was well documented in the early 1980's. In 1983 to 1984, the loss of sheep food due to kangaroo and wallaby consumption led to an opportunity cost that accounted for 51 percent of total agriculural losses. (Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service: Kangaroos; Counting the Cost.)

Negative Impacts: crop pest

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

Macropus eugenii is a very important animal in scientific research. As mentioned earlier, the species is used in studies of human reproduction and sperm production in mammals. Also, according to Russell Jones, M. eugenii is a model animal for studies of the transport of androgens (hormones that stimulate the development of male sex characteristics) to the accessory organs of reproduction. These studies may have profound effects on the field of human developmental biology.

These animals used to be hunted for meat and leather.

Positive Impacts: food ; research and education

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Tammar wallaby

The tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) also known as the dama wallaby or darma wallaby, is a small macropod native to South and Western Australia as well as some nearby islands. It may have been the first macropod to have been seen by a European. Its range was much more extensive in the past but has been severely reduced since European colonisation. Nevertheless, the tammar remains common within its limited range and is listed under Least Concern by the IUCN. It has been introduced to New Zealand and reintroduced to some areas of Australia where it has been previously eradicated. This species is largely gray in colour and is the smallest wallaby. At least three subspecies are known.

The tammar has several notable adaptations, including the ability to retain energy while hopping, colour vision and the ability to drink seawater. It is a nocturnal species and spends nighttime in grassland habitat, and daytime in shrub. It is also very gregarious and has a seasonal, promiscuous mating system. A female tammar can nurse a joey in her pouch while keeping an embryo in her uterus. The tammar is a model species for research on macropods, and on marsupials in general. It is one of many organisms to have had its genome sequenced, which has allowed greater understanding of some immunity-related genes as well as the discovery of new ones.

Contents

Taxonomy and classification

Drawing of tammar wallabies by John Gould (1863).

The tammar wallaby was seen in the Houtman Abrolhos off Western Australia by survivors of the 1628 Batavia shipwreck, and recorded by François Pelsaert in his 1629 Ongeluckige Voyagie.[2]:53 It was first described by French naturalist Anselme Gaëtan Desmarest in 1817, who named it for where it was collected—an island he knew as Ile Eugene in the Nuyts Archipelago off South Australia, but which is now known as St Peter Island. The island's French name was in honour of Eugene Hamelin, Commander of the ship Naturaliste.[3]:333 Its common name is derived from the thickets of the local shrub known as tamma (Allocasuarina campestris) that sheltered it in Western Australia.[4] It is classified together with the kangaroos, wallaroos and larger wallabies in the genus Macropus. Within this, it is placed in the subgenus Notomacropus along with several species of wallaby, all of which have a facial stripe.[5]

Subspecies

The tammar wallabies on Flinders Island were distinguished from Kangaroo Island tammars by their greyer coats and thinner heads. The East and West Wallabi Islands tammars were distinguished from the latter by their smaller size. Island tammars were once thought to be one species.[3]:333

A 1991 examination of the tammar skulls from different parts of the species' range, found that populations can be divided into three distinct groups; one group made of populations from mainland Western Australia, East and West Wallabi Islands, Garden Island and Middle Island; a second group comprising populations from Flinders Island, 19th century mainland Southern Australia and New Zealand; and a third group consisting solely of the Kangaroo Island population.[6]

Tammars at Budapest Zoo

As such, three subspecies of tammar wallaby are classified:[4]

  • M. e. derbianus (Western Australia and nearby islands)
  • M. e. decres (Kangaroo Island)
  • M. e. eugenii (mainland South Australia and New Zealand).

Evolution

Fossil evidence of the tammar wallaby exists from the late Pleistocene era—remains were found in the Naracoorte Caves.[5] The mainland and island dwelling tammars split from each other 7,000–15,000 years ago,[3]:332 while South Australian and Western Australian split around 50,000 years ago. It is likely that tammars originated in South Australia and developed a resistance to sodium fluoroacetate when they reached Western Australia.[3]:334 Mainland Western tammars appear to be the most resistant to the poison, while those on Kangaroo Island are much more vulnerable.[7] Tammars from New Zealand likely have a similar resistance level as the latter.[3]:334 Tammars from East and West Wallabi Islands and Garden Island, which do not have plants containing sodium fluoroacetate, are less resistant than mainland Western tammars but are more resistant than those from Kangaroo Island.[7]

Population dynamics and conservation

Tammar wallaby on North Island in the Houtman Abrolhos

Since European occupation, tammar wallaby populations on both mainland Australia and some islands have been greatly reduced or even eradicated. The mainland population of tammars have been described as "very plentiful in many parts of the south-west, but rapidly disappearing in the cultivated districts, especially towards the northern end of its range."[8] Clearings made for wheat and sheep caused the population to decline further.[3]:332 Farming activities led to the extinction of the tammar on Flinders Island and St. Peter's Island. Tammars in the Eyre Peninsula and around Adelaide were decimated by battues protecting crops and pastures. As a result, the tammar became extinct in the areas around Adelaide by the 1920s and in the Eyre Peninsula around the 1970s.[3]:332-33

However, tammars from these areas were introduced to Kawau Island in New Zealand over 150 years ago by former South Australian Governor George Grey.[9] Since their introduction to New Zealand, tammars have flourished to the point where their foraging has damaged indigenous plants. Pest control operators have used sodium fluoroacetate pesticides (1080) to control their populations.[10] However, the use of 1080 has been controversial, due to its possible effect on organisms not targeted, including humans. As such, cyanide pellets have been used as an alternative.[11] In 1985, tammars were introduced to the North Island of the Houtman Abrolhos and have made similar impacts on native vegetation. Their numbers have grown up to 450 individuals, but culling efforts appear to have reduced their numbers to 25 individuals by 2008.[12]:82–83 In 2003, the Monarto Zoo temporarily housed 85 tammars from New Zealand before they were reintroduced to the Yorke Peninsula in Innes National Park.[13] Four releases have been made, and a stable wild population of 100–120 animals now exists.[9] Tammars have also been successfully translocated to other areas, such as Nambung National Park and Avon Valley National Park.[1]

The tammar wallaby is listed under Least Concern by the IUCN, due to "its wide distribution, presumed large population, occurrence in a number of protected areas, and because it is unlikely to be declining at nearly the rate required to qualify for listing in a threatened category".[1] However, the fragmentation of its range has led to at least some populations having "high levels of effective inbreeding and increased frequency of morphological abnormalities".[14]

Description

The tammar wallaby is the smallest wallaby species, featuring a small head and large ears with a long tail, thick at the base.[15] In colour, it has dark grey-brown upperparts with paler grey highlights, rufous on the sides of the body and limbs, particularly in males, and pale grey-buff underparts.[4] The tammar wallaby exhibits significant sexual dimorphism, with the maximum recorded weight in males being 9.1 kg (20 lb) and maximum recorded weight in females is 6.9 kg (15 lb). The body length is 59–68 cm (23–27 in) in males and 52–63 cm (20–25 in) in females. Both males and females are about 45 cm (18 in) in height. The tails of males range from 34–45 cm (13–18 in) and those of females from 33–44 cm (13–17 in).[15]

Locomotion

Tammar wallaby in motion

As with most macropods, the tammar wallaby moves around by hopping. This species has a hopping frequency of 3.5 strides per second, with a stride length of 0.8–2.4 m (2.5–8 ft).[16] When hopping, proximal muscles at the knee and hip joints produce most of the power for the jump, which is delivered by the ankle through multi-joint muscles.[17] As it lands back on the ground, the energies of the jump are converted into the strain energy made when its leg tendons stretch.[18] As it leaps back off the ground, the tammar can recover much of this energy for reuse though elastic recoil.[18] As such, a tammar can increase its hopping speed without losing more energy. In fact, the amount of energy stored in the tendons increases with the animal's speed and the weight of the load it is carrying. This is particularly helpful for mothers carrying young.[19] The tammar shares this characteristic with other plains-dwelling macropods like the red kangaroo. By comparison, rock wallabies, such as the yellow-footed rock-wallaby, have decoupled energy saving for greater tendon thickness, which allows them to withstand the forces of hopping on rocky terrain without their tendons rupturing.[20]

Senses

The tammar has 324 degree peripheral vision and 50 degree binocular vision.[3]:312 It can discriminate black/white gratings of different widths and in different light intensities better than most other small mammals, such as rabbits.[21] It is nevertheless not as good as cat or human. In addition, it appears that the tammar has some colour vision. Its eyes have only the blue sensitive and green sensitive photoreceptor cones; allowing it to see colour in the blue-green band of the colour spectrum, but not higher wavelengths in the red-yellow band. Nevertheless, in the band where it can see colour, it can differentiate between two monochromatic colours as close as 20 nm (2.0×10−8 m).[22] The pinna of the tammar is mobile; allowing it to track sounds from different parts of its surroundings without moving its head. A tammar can point its pinna at a sound source and increase its eardrum's sound pressure by 25–30 dB at 5 kHz.[23] When the pinna moves away from the sound source, the animal's hearing level quickly drops. When born, a tammar's sense of smell is already developed; this allows the newborn to find its mother's pouch by the scent.[24]

Ecology and life history

The tammar is mostly nocturnal.

On Kangaroo Island, tammar wallabies can be found under divaricating bushes. They are mosly nocturnal and send much of the time foraging.[3]:335 Tammars live home ranges which are 42 ha (100 acres) in summer and 16 ha (40 acres) in winter; home ranges being larger in summer can be explained by the need for tammars to spend out more to look for better quaility food in his dry period. Tammar home ranges overlap with those of conspecifics. During the day, tammars stay close to scrub, and move out to more open grassland by nightfall.[3]:335 Tammars have been known to both graze and browse, however it is not as effective doing the latter as it commonly drops leaves when chewing on them.[25]:116 This species sends more time chewing its food then other similarly sized macropods which likely aids digestation.[25]:115–16 Tammars commonly feed on acacia seeds. Other species consumed include heart-leaved poison (Gastrolobium bilobum), small-flowered wallaby grass (Austrodanthonia setacea), and marri (Corymbia calophylla).[4]

Tammar resting

The tammar rests in two different positions: firstly, the "sitting tail forward" position, where the hind legs are outstreached with tail brought forward in between, the body prone and the head above ground; secondly the "lying" position, where animal lays on its side with the head touching the ground. The former is of long duration, and done mostly during the day, while the latter is more brief and done mostly at night.[25]:217–19 Tammars are known to live in stable groups.[26] Gathering in groups lessens the chance of an individual being taken by a predator. As the group increases in size, tammars spend more time foraging, grooming and interacting and less time being vigilant and moving around.[27] Predators of the tammar include dingos, feral cats, red foxes and wedge-tailed eagles. It may also have been preyed upon by the now extinct thylacine. Tammars appear to respond more to the sights than the sounds of predators.[28] When a predator is detected, a tammar will alert conspecifics by thumping its foot.[28] When lost, young tammars are known to emit a coarse screeching call and adult females may respond with a similar call.[26]

Tammars lick their forearms and pant to keep cool in hot winter. They breathe more heavily and lose more water when the temperature is over 30 °C (86 °F). Tammars can't survive in temperatures above 40 °C (104 °F) and must get away from the heat.[29] To prevent themselves from dehydrating, tammars urinate less and reabsorb water from the distal colon, which gives them relatively dry feces. Tammars live on several islands that have no fresh water and must subsist on seawater or the moisture in plants.[3]:335 Their ability to concentrate urine allows them to survive drinking seawater.[30]

Breeding and development

Mother wallaby with young in pouch

The tammar wallaby has a promiscuous mating system.[31] It is a seasonal breeder and births largely occur during late January and early February.[32]:77 After giving birth, females enter estrous and mating ends within four hours.[31] When the breeding season arrives, the male's prostate and bulbourethral gland enlarge and its peripheral testosterone is more concentrated.[33] However, there does not appear to be any seasonal difference in the weight of the testes. Around two weeks before the first birth, the males will begin sniffing the uro-gential openings and pouches of the females to determine their reproductive status.[32]:78 Females allow males to mate with them soon after giving birth. However, a male that attempts to mate with an estrous female may face aggression from other males, which can delay ejaculations.[31] A male can achieve reproductive success by mate-guarding. During the estrous period, males establish a dominance hierarchy and the higher ranking males will try to prevent subordinates from mating with estrous females.[32]:83 Several males have been observed to pursue a single female.[31]

The female tammar conceives a few hours after giving birth and suckles her young in her pouch for the next seven months. Tammars undergo embryonic diapause. For the first five months, the dormant embryo in the uterus can't develop while the young or joey is in the pouch. However, after the antipodean winter solstice in June, the embryo's development does not depend on the absence of the joey and will remain dormant in the uterus until after the summer solstice in December; months after the joey leaves the pouch.[3]:338 Gestation in the tammar lasts 26.5 days. At this time, the female's four mammary glands begin to lactate.[34] The newborn joey climbs into the pouch and suckles the teat of one mammary gland and the lactation of the other glands decline. The joey remains attached to the teat for 100–125 days. After which, it ceases its attachment, but remains in the pouch and continues to suckle at less regular intervals. The joey begins to leave the pouch and eat grass by 200 days. It suckles more forcefully but still less regularly. The joey leaves the pouch permanently after 250 days and is fully weaned at around 300–350 days.[34] Male tammars may live around 11 years while females live for 14 years.[4]

Sudden deaths

In late 1998, about 120–130 tammar wallabies died suddenly in research facilities and zoos in New South Wales and Queensland, perishing less than twelve hours after exhibiting the first symptoms, with most exhibiting no symptoms at all. Post mortem examination revealed haemorrhage of muscle, and abdominal and thoracic organs. The syndrome is known as Tammar Sudden Death Syndrome (TSDS) and the pathogen is an orbivirus of the family Reoviridae. It does not occur south of Sydney. Captive populations of tammar wallabies in New South Wales have subsequently suffered infections in summer months.[35]

Genome

Tammars are easy to keep in captivity.

The genome of a marsupial is of great interest to scientists studying comparative genomics. Marsupials are at a convenient degree of evolutionary divergence from humans; mice are too close and have not developed many different functions, while birds are genetically too remote.[36] The tammar wallaby is a model organism as it is cheap to keep in captivity and easy to handle.[36]

The tammar wallaby's genome consists of 3.6 gigabases and has a short genetic map length of 1172 centimorgans.[37] In 2009, BACs containing T cell receptor (TCR) and immunoglobulin (Ig) genes were physically mapped in tammar wallaby chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).[38] The tammar bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library yielded (BACs) containing key immune genes.[38] This research illustrates that the genomic context of the immune genes has been conserved in marsupials, thus underscoring their importance.[38] In 2011, the tammar wallaby had its full genome sequenced.[39]

References

  1. ^ a b c Morris, K.; Friend, T.; Burbidge, A; van Weenen, J. (2008). Macropus eugenii. In: IUCN 2008. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 28 December 2008. Database entry includes justification for why this species is of least concern
  2. ^ Pearson, M. (2005). Great Southern Land: The maritime exploration of Terra Australis. Department of the Environment and Heritage, Government of Australia. ISBN 0-642-55185-5. http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage/publications/about/pubs/great-southern-land.pdf. Retrieved 21 December 2007. 
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Tyndale-Biscoe, Hugh (2005). Life of Marsupials. CSIRO Publishing. ISBN 0-643-06257-2. 
  4. ^ a b c d e "Tammar Wallaby". Western Australia Department of Environment and Conservation. http://www.dec.wa.gov.au/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_download/gid,133/Itemid,/. Retrieved 12 June 2011. 
  5. ^ a b Dawson, L.; Flannery, T. (1985). "Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Status of Living and Fossil Kangaroos and Wallabies of the Genus Macropus Shaw (Macropodidae: Marsupialia), with a New Subgeneric Name for the Larger Wallabies". Australian Journal of Zoology 33 (4): 473–98. doi:10.1071/ZO9850473. 
  6. ^ Poole, W. E.; Wood, J. T.; Simms, N. G. (1991). "Distribution of the Tammar and relationships of populations as determined by cranial morphometrics". Wildlife Research 18 (5): 625–39. doi:10.1071/WR9910625. 
  7. ^ a b Oliver, A. J. (1979). "Fluoroacetate Tolerance, a Genetic Marker in Some Australian Mammals". Australian Journal of Zoology 27 (3): 363–72. doi:10.1071/ZO9790363. 
  8. ^ Shortridge, G. C. (1909). "An Account of the Geographical Distribution of the Marsupials and Monotremes of South-West Australia, having special reference to the specimens collected during the Balston Expedition of 1904–1907". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 79 (4): 803–48. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1910.tb06974.x. 
  9. ^ a b "'Extinct' wallaby goes back on show". ABC News. 14 February 2012. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-02-14/wallabies-mainland-tammar-warrawong/3828346. Retrieved 14 February 2012. 
  10. ^ Warburton, B. (1990). "Control of Bennett's and Tammar Wallabies in New Zealand Using Compound 1080 Gel on Foliage Baits". Australian Wildlife Research 17 (5): 541–46. doi:10.1071/WR9900541. 
  11. ^ Shapiro, L.; Ross, J.; Adams, P.; Keyzer, R.; Hix, S.; MacMorran, D.; Cunningham, C.; Eason, C. (2011). "Effectiveness of cyanide pellets for control of dama wallabies (Macropus eugenii)". New Zealand Journal of Ecology 35 (3): 287–90. ISSN 01106465. http://www.newzealandecology.org/nzje/new_issues/NZJEcol35_3_287.pdf. 
  12. ^ "Wallabies — Culling". Minutes of the Western Australian Legislative Council, Tuesday 19 February 2008. http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard/hansard.nsf/0/BC97B320B74018D1C825758A001A99C2/$File/C37%20S1%2020080219%20All.pdf. Retrieved 22 January 2012. 
  13. ^ "Tammar Wallaby Reintroduction: To breed and reintroduce tamar wallabies into their former range in Australia". World Association of Zoos and Aquariums. http://www.waza.org/en/site/conservation/waza-conservation-projects/overview/tamar-wallaby-reintroduction. Retrieved 10 January 2012. 
  14. ^ Miller, E. J.; Eldridge, M. D. B.; Morris, K. D.; Zenger, K. R.; Herbert, C. A.. "Genetic consequences of isolation: island tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) populations and the conservation of threatened species". Conservation Genetics 12 (6): 1619–31. doi:10.1007/s10592-011-0265-2. 
  15. ^ a b Labiano-Abello, A. M. "Macropus eugenii Tammar wallaby". Animal Diversity Web, University of Michigan. http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Macropus_eugenii.html. Retrieved 12 June 2011. 
  16. ^ Baudinette, R.V.; Gannon, B. J.; Runciman, W.B.; Wells, S.; Love, J. B. (1987). "Do cardiorespiratory frequencies show entrainment with hopping in the tammar wallaby?". Journal of Experimental Biology 129 (1): 251–63. PMID 3585241. http://jeb.biologists.org/content/129/1/251.full.pdf. 
  17. ^ McGowan, C. P.; Baudinette, R.V.; Biewener, A. A. (2005). "Joint work and power associated with acceleration and deceleration in tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii)". Journal of Experimental Biology 208 (1): 41–53. doi:10.1242/jeb.01305. PMID 15601876. http://jeb.biologists.org/content/208/1/41.full.pdf. 
  18. ^ a b Biewener, A. A; Baudinette, R. V. (1995). "In vivo muscle force and elastic energy storage during steady-speed hopping of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii)". Journal of Experimental Biology 198 (9): 1829–41. PMID 9319738. http://jeb.biologists.org/content/198/9/1829.full.pdf. 
  19. ^ Baudinette, R. V; Biewener, A. A (1998). "Young wallabies get a free ride". Nature 296: 653–54. doi:10.1038/27111. 
  20. ^ McGowan, C. P.; Baudinette, R. V.; Biewener, A. A. (2008). "Differential design for hopping in two species of wallabies". Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 150 (2): 151–58. PMID 16861021. http://www.sci.uidaho.edu/McGowanLab/pubs/McGowan_CBP%202008.pdf. 
  21. ^ Hemmi, J. M.; Mark, R. F. (1998). "Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and retinal magnification in a marsupial, the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii)". Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 183 (3): 379–87. PMID 9763704. 
  22. ^ Hemmi, J. M. (1999). "Dichromatic colour vision in an Australian marsupial, the tammar wallaby". Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 185 (6): 509–15. doi:10.1007/s003590050411. 
  23. ^ Coles, R. B.; Guppy, A. (1986). "Biophysical Aspects of Directional Hearing in the Tammar Wallaby, Macropus Eugenii". Journal of Experimental Biology 121 (1): 371–94. http://jeb.biologists.org/content/121/1/371.full.pdf. 
  24. ^ Schneider, N. Y.; Fletcher, T. P.; Shaw, G.; Renfree; M. B. (2009). "The olfactory system of the tammar wallaby is developed at birth and directs the neonate to its mother's pouch odours". Reproduction 138 (5): 849–57. doi:10.1530/REP-09-0145. PMID 19638443. 
  25. ^ a b c Lentle, R. G. (1998). Feeding strategies of the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii Desmarest) (Ph.D. thesis). Massey University. http://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/2869. 
  26. ^ a b Russell, E. M. (1984). "Social behaviour and social organization of marsupials". Mammal Review 14 (3): 101–54. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.1984.tb00343.x. 
  27. ^ Blumstein, D. T.; Evans, C. S.; Daniel, J. C. (1999). "An experimental study of behavioural group size effects in tammar wallabies, Macropus eugenii". Animal Behaviour 58 (2): 351–60. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1156. ISSN 00033472. PMID 10458887. 
  28. ^ a b Blumstein, D. T.; Daniel, J. C.; Griffin, A. S.; Evans, C. S. (2000). "Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators". Behavioral Ecology 11 (5): 528–35. doi:10.1093/beheco/11.5.528. 
  29. ^ Dawson, T. J.; Denny, M. J, S.; Hulbert, A. J. (1969). "Thermal balance of the macropodid marsupial Macropus eugenii (Desmarest)". Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry 31 (4): 645–53. doi:10.1016/0010-406X(69)90065-6. 
  30. ^ Hum, I. D.; Dunning, A. (1979). "Nitrogen and electrolyte balance in the wallabies Thylogale thetis and Macropus eugenii when given saline drinking water". Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology 63 (1): 135–39. doi:10.1016/0300-9629(79)90639-X. 
  31. ^ a b c d Rudd, C. D. (1994). "Sexual behaviour of male and female tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) at post-partum oestrus". Journal of Zoology 232 (1): 151–62. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb01565.x. 
  32. ^ a b c Coulson, G.; Eldridge, M. (2010). Macropods: The Biology of Kangaroos, Wallabies and Rat-Kangaroos. CSIRO Publishing. ISBN 0-643-09662-0. 
  33. ^ Inns, R. W. (1982). "Seasonal changes in the accessory reproductive system and plasma testosterone levels of the male tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii, in the wild". Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 66 (2): 675–80. doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0660675. 
  34. ^ a b Trott, J. F.; Simpson, K. J.; Moyle, R. L. C.; Hearn, C. M.; Shaw, G.; Nicholas, K. R.; Renfree, M. B. (2003). "Maternal regulation of milk composition, milk production, and pouch young development during lactation in the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii)". Biology of Reproduction 68 (3): 929–36. PMID 12604644. http://www.biolreprod.org/content/68/3/929.full.pdf. 
  35. ^ Kirkland, P. D. (2005). "Epidemic Viral Diseases in Wildlife". Microbiology Australia 26 (2): 82–85. ISSN 1324-4272. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=haCr7ztxTrwC&pg=PA82&dq=Tammar+Wallaby#v=onepage&q=Tammar%20Wallaby&f=false. 
  36. ^ a b Marshall Graves, J. A. (2002). "Comparative Genomics: Kangaroo genetics leap ahead". Heredity 89 (6): 406–07. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800191. 
  37. ^ Marshall Graves, J. A; Wakefield, M. J.; Renfree, M. B.; Cooper, D. W.; Speed, T.; Lindblad-Toh, K.; Lander, E. S.; Wilson, R. K. (2003). "Proposal to sequence the genome of the model marsupial Macropus eugenii (Tammar Wallaby)". National Human Genome Research Institute. pp. 1–3. http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/Sequencing/SeqProposals/WallabySEQ.pdf. Retrieved 13 June 2011. 
  38. ^ a b c Sanderson, C. E.; Belov, K.; Deakin, J. E. (2009). "Physical mapping of immune genes in the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii)". Cytogenet Genome Res 127 (1): 21–25. doi:10.1159/000260372. 
  39. ^ Renfree M. B.; Papenfuss, A. T.; Deakin, J. E.; Lindsay, J.; Heider, T.; Belov, K.; Rens, W.; Waters, P. D.; Pharo, E. A.; Shaw, G.; Wong, E. S.; Lefèvre, C. M.; Nicholas, K. R.; Kuroki, Y.; Wakefield, M. J.; Zenger, K. R.; Wang, C.; Ferguson-Smith, M.; Nicholas, F. W.; Hickford, D.; Yu, H.; Short, K. R.; Siddle, H. V.; Frankenberg, S. R.; Chew, K. Y.; Menzies, B. R.; Stringer, J. M.; Suzuki, S.; Hore, T. A.; Delbridge, M. L.; Mohammadi, A.; Schneider, N. Y.; Hu, Y.; O'Hara, W.; Al Nadaf, S.; Wu, C.; Feng, Z. P.; Cocks, B. G.; Wang, J.; Flicek, P.; Searle, S. M.; Fairley, S.; Beal, K.; Herrero, J.; Carone, D. M.; Suzuki, Y.; Sugano, S.; Toyoda, A.; Sakaki, Y.; Kondo, S.; Nishida, Y.; Tatsumoto, S.; Mandiou, I.; Hsu, A.; McColl, K. A.; Lansdell, B.; Weinstock, G.; Kuczek, E.; McGrath, A.; Wilson, P.; Men, A.; Hazar-Rethinam, M.; Hall, A.; Davis, J.; Wood, D.; Williams, S.; Sundaravadanam, Y.; Muzny, D. M.; Jhangiani, S. N.; Lewis, L. R.; Morgan, M. B.; Okwuonu, G. O.; Ruiz, S. J.; Santibanez, J.; Nazareth, L.; Cree, A.; Fowler, G.; Kovar, C. L.; Dinh, H. H.; Joshi, V.; Jing, C.; Lara, F.; Thornton, R.; Chen, L.; Deng, J.; Liu, Y.; Shen, J. Y.; Song, X. Z.; Edson, J.; Troon, C.; Thomas, D.; Stephens, A.; Yapa, L.; Levchenko, T.; Gibbs, R. A.; Cooper, D. W.; Speed, T. P.; Fujiyama, A.; Marshall Graves, J. A.; O'Neill, R. J.; Pask, A. J.; Forrest, S. M.; Worley, K. C. (2011). "Genome sequence of an Australian kangaroo, Macropus eugenii, provides insight into the evolution of mammalian reproduction and development.". Genome Biology 12 (8): R81. doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-8-r81. PMC 3277949. PMID 21854559. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3277949. 
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!